Intel Core i7-6700K vs Pentium D 3.40GHz
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i7-6700K vs Pentium D 3.40GHz
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80662I76700K
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 547,777 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
3,788 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 38% Base clock 3.4 GHz
Worst Bench: 18% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 18%
Great: 38%
SPEED RANK: 1203rd / 1368
|
Gaming 32% Sail boat |
Desktop 36% Jet ski |
Workstation 21% Surfboard |
543,989 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4. 6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72%
Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 166th / 1368
|
Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier |
Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier |
Workstation 68% Battle cruiser |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
32.2 % | 81.8 % | Hugely faster effective speed. +154% |
| Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
55.5 Pts | 88.7 Pts | Much lower memory latency. +60% |
|||
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
27.8 Pts | 121 Pts | Hugely faster single-core speed. +335% |
|||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
53.3 Pts | 228 Pts | Hugely faster dual-core speed. +328% |
|||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
54.5 Pts | 405 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +643% |
|||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
55 Pts | 623 Pts | Insanely faster octa-core speed. +1,033% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency |
67 Pts | 96. 3 Pts |
Much lower OC memory latency. +44% |
|||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
30.7 Pts | 137 Pts | Hugely faster OC single-core speed. +346% |
|||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
60.8 Pts | 264 Pts | Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +334% |
|||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
60.6 Pts | 468 Pts | Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +672% |
|||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
60.6 Pts | 728 Pts | Insanely faster OC octa-core speed. +1,101% |
Market Share
Based on 56,286,518 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0 % | 1.07 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
|||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
50 % | 78 % | Much more popular. +56% |
| Age Newest |
105+ Months | 87 Months | More recent. +17% |
|||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
60.8 Pts | 734 Pts | Insanely faster OC 64-core speed. +1,107% |
|||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
55.2 Pts | 635 Pts | Insanely faster 64-core speed. +1,050% |
ADVERTISEMENT
The Core i7-6700K is Intel’s latest «Skylake» flagship processor. It replaces the hugely successful i7-4790K and takes the crown as the fastest mainstream consumer CPU available. Comparing performance and specs between the 4790K and 6700K shows that the configuration is largely unchanged (same base clocks, cores, threads) but the improved manufacturing process (14nm) brings a small reduction in TDP and a performance improvement of 8%; almost exactly the same jump as between the Ivy Bridge 3770K and Haswell 4770K.
Owners of any unlocked-K Intel CPU from Sandy Bridge or onwards still have no real reason to upgrade as the performance improvements are largely academic but the i7-6700K will be the CPU of choice for the vast majority of top end PC builds in 2015. [Aug ’15 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- Dell OptiPlex 745 (11)
- bin bin (8)
- Dell OptiPlex GX620 (7)
- Gbt___ AWRDACPI (7)
- Dell DXP051 (6)
- Intel D945GTP (5)
- HP Compaq dc7600 Convertible Minitower (5)
- Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (3,305)
- Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (2,349)
- Asus Z170-A (1,907)
- MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) (1,236)
- Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 (1,129)
- MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) (864)
- Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER (860)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i7-13700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Intel Core i7-6500U vs Pentium D 3.
00GHz
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
▲
54628
▼
2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.5 GHz, Skylake.
Release date ≈ Q4 2015.
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 112,479 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
4,280 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Base clock 3 GHz
Worst Bench: 15% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 15%
Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 1266th / 1368
|
Gaming 30% Raft |
Desktop 33% Sail boat |
Workstation 19% Surfboard |
108,199 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% Base clock 2.
6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37%
Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 661st / 1368
|
Gaming 54% Yacht |
Desktop 60% Destroyer |
Workstation 39% Jet ski |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
29.6 % | 54 % | Hugely faster effective speed. +82% |
| Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
52 Pts | 71.7 Pts | Much lower memory latency. +38% |
|||
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
23.6 Pts | 77.1 Pts | Hugely faster single-core speed. +227% |
|||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
43.9 Pts | 138 Pts | Hugely faster dual-core speed. +214% |
|||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
44.6 Pts | 211 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +373% |
|||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
45.2 Pts | 216 Pts | Hugely faster octa-core speed. +378% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency |
65. 5 Pts |
84.6 Pts | Lower OC memory latency. +29% |
|||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
26.9 Pts | 92.4 Pts | Hugely faster OC single-core speed. +243% |
|||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
53.2 Pts | 167 Pts | Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +214% |
|||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
53.2 Pts | 253 Pts | Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +376% |
|||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
53.3 Pts | 252 Pts | Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +373% |
Market Share
Based on 56,286,518 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0 % | 0.19 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
|||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
50 % | 54 % | Slightly more popular. +8% |
| Age Newest |
106+ Months | 84+ Months | More recent. +21% |
|||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
53.2 Pts | 253 Pts | Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +376% |
|||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
45.3 Pts | 216 Pts | Hugely faster 64-core speed. +377% |
ADVERTISEMENT
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- Gigabyte GA-G41MT-S2PT (8)
- Dell OptiPlex 745 (8)
- Asus P5LD2 (7)
- Dell DM061 (6)
- Dell Dimension 9100 (4)
- Dell OptiPlex GX620 (4)
- Asus P5B (4)
- Dell Inspiron 5559 (648)
- HP Pavilion Notebook (533)
- HP Notebook (297)
- HP ENVY Notebook (260)
- HP Spectre x360 Convertible (186)
- Lenovo 80NT (180)
- HP ProBook 450 G3 (176)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i7-13700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Comparison of Intel Core i7-975 and Intel Pentium D 820
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-975 and Intel Pentium D 820 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Core i7-975
versus
Intel Pentium D 820
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-975
- Newer processor, release date difference 4 year(s) 1 month(s)
- CPU unlocked, easily unlocked overclock
- 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- About 29% more clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- About 6% more maximum core temperature: 67.
9°C vs 64.1°C power consumption: 45 nm vs 90 nm - 9.1 times larger L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- 3.4 times greater performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 606 vs 179
- 7.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2380 vs 307
| Release date | June 2009 vs May 2005 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 67. 9°C vs 64.1°C |
| Process | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 28 KB |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 606 vs 179 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2380 vs 307 |
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium D 820
- L2 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 37% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 130 Watt
9004
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-975
CPU 2: Intel Pentium D 820
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-975 | Intel Pentium D 820 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1510 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3366 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 606 | 179 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2380 | 307 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
1.084 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 63.217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.858 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.196 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i7-975 | Intel Pentium D 820 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Bloomfield | Smithfield |
| Production date | June 2009 | May 2005 |
| Price at first issue date | $476 | |
| Place in the ranking | 1986 | 2713 |
| Price now | $179. 99 |
|
| Processor Number | i7-975 | 820 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 10.04 | |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 33 GHz |
2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 6.4 GT/s QPI | 800 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 263 mm2 | 206 mm2 |
| System bus (FSB) | 1333MHz | 800 MHz |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 28KB |
| Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2048KB |
| Level 3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Process | 45nm | 90nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 67. 9°C |
64.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of QPI Links | 1 | |
| Number of threads | 8 | 2 |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 230 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Permissible core voltage | 0. 800V-1.375V |
1.200V-1.400V |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 3 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors per configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 42. 5mm x 45.0mm |
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCLGA1366 | PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | 32-bit |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Parity FSB | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Compare Intel Core i7-1185G7E and Intel Pentium D 945
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-1185G7E and Intel Pentium D 945 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technologies, Virtualization .
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Core i7-1185G7E
versus
Intel Pentium D 945
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-1185G7E
- 2 more cores, able to run more applications at the same time: 4 GHz vs 2
- approx. vs 3.4 GHz
- Approximately 58% higher maximum core temperature: 100C vs 63.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows the processor to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 10 nm SuperFin vs 65 nm
- 6.3 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 4. |
| Maximum core temperature | 100C vs 63.4°C |
| Process | 10nm SuperFin vs 65nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium D 945
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-1185G7E
CPU 2: Intel Pentium D 945
| Name | Intel Core i7-1185G7E | Intel Pentium D 945 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2549 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 9980 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 220 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 389 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i7-1185G7E | Intel Pentium D 945 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Tiger Lake | Presler |
| Production date | Q3’20 | |
| Price at first issue date | $431 | |
| Place in the ranking | 441 | 2697 |
| Processor Number | i7-1185G7E | 945 |
| Series | 11th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Application | Embedded | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1. |
3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s | 800 MHz FSB |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB | |
| Process | 10nm SuperFin | 65nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100C | 63.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.40 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Operating Temperature Range | 0°C to 100°C | |
| Crystal area | 162 mm2 | |
| Level 1 cache | 28KB | |
| Level 2 cache | 4096KB | |
| Number of transistors | 376 million | |
| Permissible core voltage | 1. |
|
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 64GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Device ID | 0x9A49 | |
| Number of execution units | 96 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.35 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 4 | |
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12. |
|
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Configurable TDP-down | 12 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 28 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.80 GHz | |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 46. |
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCBGA1449 | PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel SSE4. |