AMD FX-8370 vs AMD Phenom II X4 965: What is the difference?
34points
AMD FX-8370
22points
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Comparison winner
vs
63 facts in comparison
AMD FX-8370
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Why is AMD FX-8370 better than AMD Phenom II X4 965?
- 2.35x faster CPU speed?
8 x 4GHzvs4 x 3.4GHz - 533MHz higher ram speed?
1866MHzvs1333MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8vs4 - 13nm smaller semiconductor size?
32nmvs45nm - 6MB bigger L2 cache?
8MBvs2MB - 2.1x higher PassMark result?
9049vs4306 - 2MB bigger L3 cache?
8MBvs6MB - 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/corevs0.5MB/core
Why is AMD Phenom II X4 965 better than AMD FX-8370?
- Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 128KB bigger L1 cache?
512KBvs384KB - 0.
5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
1.5MB/corevs1MB/core
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i5-3330
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD Athlon II X2 270
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
AMD FX-8370
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD FX-4100
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD FX-8370
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD FX-4300
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
Intel Core i3-2120
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Phenom II X4 965
vs
AMD FX-4100
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD FX-8370
0 User reviews
AMD FX-8370
0.
0/10
0 User reviews
AMD Phenom II X4 965
1 User reviews
AMD Phenom II X4 965
10.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
9.0/10
1 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
8.0/10
1 votes
Performance
CPU speed
8 x 4GHz
4 x 3.4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.3GHz
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Phenom II X4 965
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
1MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(AMD Phenom II X4 965)
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1866MHz
1333MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
21.3GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
5.4GT/s
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✖AMD FX-8370
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD FX-8370
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔AMD FX-8370
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD FX-8370
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD FX-8370
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Phenom II X4 965
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD FX-8370
✖AMD Phenom II X4 965
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD FX-8370 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD FX-8370
The AMD FX-8370 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 4.15 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2014
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 (LGA 1331) CPU socket.
This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 24 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Cezanne (Zen 3) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2021
AMD FX-8370
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Compare Detail
| 4.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.90 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 6 |
| 4.30 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.40 GHz |
| 4.15 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.20 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU |
AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir) |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 32 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | 12 | |
Max. displays |
3 | |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | 3.00 MB |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 3.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 24 | |
| 32 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 (LGA 1331) |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q2/2021 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.
5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| AMD FX-8370 | AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | |
| 125 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
AMD FX-8370 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600: What is the difference?
34 BALLLA
AMD FX-8370
52 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Winter when comparing
VS
63 facts compared to 9000 Is 8370 better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600?
- 1.
57x higher CPU speed?
8 x 4GHz vs 6 x 3.4GHz - 5MB more L2 cache?
8MB vs 3MB - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.3GHz vs 3.9GHz - 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.5MB/core - 7.3 higher performance per watt?
88.0 vs 80.7 - Has FMA4?
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600 better than AMD FX-8370?
- 1067MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 1866MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - 34°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
95°C vs 61°C - Semiconductor size 20nm smaller?
12nm vs 32nm - 45.95% higher PassMark score?
13207 vs 9049 - 60W below TDP?
65W vs 125W - 8MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 8MB - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD FX-8370
VS
AMD FX-8350
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD FX-63000 VS 9000 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD FX-8370
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AMD FX-8370
VS
AMD Ryzen 5,000 9000 AMDEN 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700x
AMD FX-8370
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
AMD FX -8370
000 AMD FX -837
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD FX-8370
VS
AMD FX-4100
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen AMD -8370
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
AMD FX-8370
AMD Phenom II X4
9000 Ry
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD FX-8370
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 2200G
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Comers 8370
0 Reviews of users
AMD FX-8370
0.
0 /10
0 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
4 Users
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
10.0 /10
4 Reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
Reviews are not
10.0 /10
4 Votes
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
10.0 /10
4 Votes
performance
reviews yet there are no
10.0 /10
4 Votes
Reliability
003
reviews yet there is no
10.0 /10
4 Votes
Energy efficiency
Reviews are not
10.0 /10
9000 4 Votes
Code
Code
8 x 4GHz
6 x 3.4GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.3GHz
3.9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
1MB/core
2.67MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(AMD FX-8370)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
295.1seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender result (classroom)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of graphics processing unit (GPU) power for non-graphics computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
Memory
RAM speed
1866MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
43.
71GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
5.4GT/s
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption.
It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD RYZEN 5 2600)
The bus is responsible for the data transfer between different components of the computer or device
Functions
Uses a multi-plate of
✖AMD FX-8370
✔AMD RYZEN 5 2600
Multiplying technology (such as Hyperthreing from Intel or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads.
Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD FX-8370
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD FX-8370
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price Comparison
Which CPUs are better?
Comparison of AMD FX-8370 and AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8370 and AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-8370
versus
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD FX-8370
- Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 902.9 cores 902.9 more run more applications at the same time: 8 vs 6
- About 30% more clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- A newer process of manufacturing the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- L2 cache is 2.
7 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access - L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in PassMark — Single about 9% more thread mark: 1630 vs 1500
- About 63% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6158 vs 3776
- About 13% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 576 vs 509
- About 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 2794 vs 2230
- 2.1 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.994 vs 4.711 9002 about 35% more in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 21.936 vs 16.192
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining benchmark (mHash/s) about 40% more: 7.236 vs 5.182
| Issue date | September 2014 vs December 2010 |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Maximum frequency | 4. 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| Process | 32nm SOI vs 45nm |
| Level 2 cache | 8 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1630 vs 1500 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6158 vs 3776 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 576 vs 509 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2794 vs 2230 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9. 994 vs 4.711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.936 vs 16.192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.236 vs 5.182 |
Reasons to choose AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
- 2x larger L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
| Level 1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 384 KB |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD FX-8370
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
| Name | AMD FX-8370 | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1630 | 1500 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6158 | 3776 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 576 | 509 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2794 | 2230 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3124 | 0 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
9.994 | 4.711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.936 | 16.192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.413 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.025 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.236 | 5.182 |
Feature comparison
| AMD FX-8370 | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Vishera | Thuban |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| Issue date | September 2014 | December 2010 |
| OPN PIB | FD8370FRHKHBX | |
| Place in the rating | 1713 | 2099 |
| Price now | $129. 99 |
|
| Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 20.46 | |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 4 GHz | |
| Crystal area | 315 mm | 346 mm |
| Level 1 cache | 384KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 8MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 8MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Process | 32nm SOI | 45nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 61.
|