Phenom fx 8370 vs ryzen: AMD FX-8370 vs Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-8370 vs AMD Phenom II X4 965: What is the difference?

34points

AMD FX-8370

22points

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Comparison winner

vs

63 facts in comparison

AMD FX-8370

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Why is AMD FX-8370 better than AMD Phenom II X4 965?

  • 2.35x faster CPU speed?
    8 x 4GHzvs4 x 3.4GHz
  • 533MHz higher ram speed?
    1866MHzvs1333MHz
  • 4 more CPU threads?
    8vs4
  • 13nm smaller semiconductor size?
    32nmvs45nm
  • 6MB bigger L2 cache?
    8MBvs2MB
  • 2.1x higher PassMark result?
    9049vs4306
  • 2MB bigger L3 cache?
    8MBvs6MB
  • 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    1MB/corevs0.5MB/core

Why is AMD Phenom II X4 965 better than AMD FX-8370?

  • Has an unlocked multiplier?
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    512KBvs384KB
  • 0. 5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
    1.5MB/corevs1MB/core

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD FX-8350

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

Intel Core i5-3330

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

AMD Athlon II X2 270

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

AMD FX-6300

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

Intel Core i3-3220

AMD FX-8370

vs

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD FX-4100

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD FX-8370

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

AMD FX-4300

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD Phenom II X4 955

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

Intel Core i3-2120

AMD FX-8370

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Phenom II X4 965

vs

AMD FX-4100

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-8370

0 User reviews

AMD FX-8370

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

AMD Phenom II X4 965

1 User reviews

AMD Phenom II X4 965

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

9.0/10

1 votes

Energy efficiency

No reviews yet

 

8.0/10

1 votes

Performance

CPU speed

8 x 4GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

turbo clock speed

4.3GHz

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

Has an unlocked multiplier

✖AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Phenom II X4 965

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

L2 core

1MB/core

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

L3 core

1MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Benchmarks

PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Integrated graphics

GPU clock speed

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

GPU turbo

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

GPU execution units

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.

supported displays

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.

DirectX version

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

OpenGL version

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

OpenCL version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

texture mapping units (TMUs)

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

render output units (ROPs)

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

RAM speed

1866MHz

1333MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

21.3GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-8370

✖AMD Phenom II X4 965

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Features

uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-8370

✖AMD Phenom II X4 965

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

Has AES

✔AMD FX-8370

✖AMD Phenom II X4 965

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8370

✖AMD Phenom II X4 965

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8370

✖AMD Phenom II X4 965

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Phenom II X4 965

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8370

✖AMD Phenom II X4 965

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Phenom II X4 965)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD FX-8370 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD FX-8370

The AMD FX-8370 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 4.15 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2014

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 (LGA 1331) CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 24 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Cezanne (Zen 3) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2021

AMD FX-8370

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Compare Detail

4.00 GHz Frequency 3.90 GHz
8 Cores 6
4.30 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 4.40 GHz
4.15 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 4.20 GHz
No Hyperthreading Yes
Yes Overclocking Yes
normal Core Architecture normal
no iGPU GPU

AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir)

No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
32 nm Technology 7 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
DirectX Version 12
Max. displays 3
DDR3-1866 Memory DDR4-3200
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
Yes ECC No
L2 Cache 3.00 MB
8.00 MB L3 Cache 16.00 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 24
32 nm Technology 7 nm
AM3+ Socket AM4 (LGA 1331)
125 W TDP 65 W
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Q3/2014 Release date Q2/2021

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD FX-8370 AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
125 W Max TDP 65 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

AMD FX-8370 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600: What is the difference?

34 BALLLA

AMD FX-8370

52 BALLLA

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Winter when comparing

VS

63 facts compared to 9000 Is 8370 better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

  • 1. 57x higher CPU speed?
    8 x 4GHz vs 6 x 3.4GHz
  • 5MB more L2 cache?
    8MB vs 3MB
  • 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    4.3GHz vs 3.9GHz
  • 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    1MB/core vs 0.5MB/core
  • 7.3 higher performance per watt?
    88.0 vs 80.7
  • Has FMA4?

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600 better than AMD FX-8370?

  • 1067MHz higher RAM speed?
    2933MHz vs 1866MHz
  • 4 more CPU threads?
    12 vs 8
  • 34°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
    95°C vs 61°C
  • Semiconductor size 20nm smaller?
    12nm vs 32nm
  • 45.95% higher PassMark score?
    13207 vs 9049
  • 60W below TDP?
    65W vs 125W
  • 8MB more L3 cache?
    16MB vs 8MB
  • 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
    3 vs 2

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD FX-8370

VS

AMD FX-8350

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

AMD FX-63000 VS 9000 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD FX-8370

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 3700x

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 4500

AMD FX-8370

VS

AMD Ryzen 5,000 9000 AMDEN 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5700x

AMD FX-8370

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600g

AMD FX -8370

000 AMD FX -837

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

VS

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD FX-8370

VS

AMD FX-4100

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen AMD -8370

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

AMD FX-8370

AMD Phenom II X4

9000 Ry

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AMD FX-8370

VS

AMD RYZEN 3 2200G

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Comers 8370

0 Reviews of users

AMD FX-8370

0. 0 /10

0 Reviews of users

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

4 Users

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

10.0 /10

4 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

Reviews are not

10.0 /10

4 Votes

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

10.0 /10

4 Votes

performance

reviews yet there are no

10.0 /10

4 Votes

Reliability

003

reviews yet there is no

10.0 /10

4 Votes

Energy efficiency

Reviews are not

10.0 /10

9000 4 Votes

Code

Code

8 x 4GHz

6 x 3.4GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

turbo clock speed

4.3GHz

3.9GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

Has an unlocked multiplier

✖AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L2 core

1MB/core

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

L3 core

1MB/core

2.67MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Geotagging

PassMark result

This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.

PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

295.1seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Integrated graphics

OpenCL version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of graphics processing unit (GPU) power for non-graphics computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

Memory

RAM speed

1866MHz

2933MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

43. 71GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

DDR version

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

bus baud rate

5.4GT/s

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

Supports memory recovery code

✖AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD RYZEN 5 2600)

The bus is responsible for the data transfer between different components of the computer or device

Functions

Uses a multi-plate of

✖AMD FX-8370

✔AMD RYZEN 5 2600

Multiplying technology (such as Hyperthreing from Intel or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

Has AES

✔AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

version of SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8370

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8370

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.

interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price Comparison

Which CPUs are better?

Comparison of AMD FX-8370 and AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8370 and AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-8370

versus

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8370

  • Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 902.9 cores 902.9 more run more applications at the same time: 8 vs 6
  • About 30% more clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • A newer process of manufacturing the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
  • L2 cache is 2. 7 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • Performance in PassMark — Single about 9% more thread mark: 1630 vs 1500
  • About 63% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6158 vs 3776
  • About 13% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 576 vs 509
  • About 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 2794 vs 2230
  • 2.1 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.994 vs 4.711 9002 about 35% more in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 21.936 vs 16.192
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining benchmark (mHash/s) about 40% more: 7.236 vs 5.182
Issue date September 2014 vs December 2010
Number of cores 8 vs 6
Maximum frequency 4. 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
Process 32nm SOI vs 45nm
Level 2 cache 8 MB vs 512 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared)
PassMark — Single thread mark 1630 vs 1500
PassMark — CPU mark 6158 vs 3776
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 576 vs 509
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2794 vs 2230
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9. 994 vs 4.711
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.936 vs 16.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.236 vs 5.182

Reasons to choose AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE

  • 2x larger L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
Level 1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 384 KB

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-8370
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
21.936
16.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name AMD FX-8370 AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
PassMark — Single thread mark 1630 1500
PassMark — CPU mark 6158 3776
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 576 509
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2794 2230
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3124 0
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.994 4.711
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.936 16.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.413
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.236 5.182

Feature comparison

AMD FX-8370 AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Architecture name Vishera Thuban
Family AMD FX-Series Processors
Issue date September 2014 December 2010
OPN PIB FD8370FRHKHBX
Place in the rating 1713 2099
Price now $129. 99
Series AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 20.46
Applicability Desktop Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 4 GHz
Crystal area 315 mm 346 mm
Level 1 cache 384KB 128 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 8MB 512 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 8MB 6144 KB (shared)
Process 32nm SOI 45nm
Maximum core temperature 61.

2023 © All rights reserved