Phenom ii 925: AMD Phenom II X4 925 Specs

Phenom II X4 925 [in 3 benchmarks]


AMD
Phenom II X4 925

Buy

  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD Phenom II X4 925 sales on May 2009 at a recommended price of $160. This is Deneb architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2800 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket AM3 processor with a TDP of 95 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at


2.18%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


Phenom II
X4 925

vs


EPYC
7h22

General info


Phenom II X4 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating 1886
Value for money 4.81
Market segment Desktop processor
Architecture codename Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date May 2009 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $160 of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price $31 (0.2x MSRP) of 18494 (Xeon Platinum 8280M)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs


Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores 4 (Quad-Core)
Threads 4
Boost clock speed 2.8 GHz of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache 6 MB (shared) of 32 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography 45 nm of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size 258 mm2
Number of transistors 758 million of 9900000 (Ryzen 9 7950X)
64 bit support +
Windows 11 compatibility

Compatibility


Information on Phenom II X4 925 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket AM3
Thermal design power (TDP) 95 Watt of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Memory specs


Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 925’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types DDR3 of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)

Benchmark performance


Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Phenom II X4 925. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


Phenom II X4 925
2.18

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 69%


Phenom II X4 925
2196

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


Phenom II X4 925
380

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


Phenom II X4 925
1294


Mining hashrates


Cryptocurrency mining performance of Phenom II X4 925. Usually measured in megahashes per second.


Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 3.2 Mh/s  

Relative perfomance


Overall Phenom II X4 925 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.



Intel Core i5-650
100. 92


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
100.46


AMD Athlon II X4 640
100.46


AMD Phenom II X4 925
100


Intel Pentium G4400TE
99.54


AMD A8-3820
99.54


Intel Pentium G3460
99.54

Intel equivalent


We believe that the nearest equivalent to Phenom II X4 925 from Intel is Pentium G4400TE, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our rating.


Pentium
G4400TE


Compare


Here are some closest Intel rivals to Phenom II X4 925:


Intel Core i5-650
100. 92


Intel Celeron G3930TE
100.92


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
100.46


AMD Phenom II X4 925
100


Intel Pentium G3460
99.54


Intel Pentium G4400TE
99.54


Intel Celeron G3900
99.08

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


Athlon II
X4 640


Compare


A8
3820


Compare


Core i5
650


Compare


Core i3
3220


Compare


Athlon II
X3 425e


Compare


Athlon II
X4 635


Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Phenom II X4 925 according to our statistics.


GeForce GTX
750 Ti

5.8%


GeForce GTS
450

5.5%


GeForce GTX
550 Ti

4.9%


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

4.7%


GeForce GTX
650

3.7%


GeForce GT
730

3.2%


GeForce GT
1030

2.8%


GeForce GTS
250

2. 6%


Radeon RX
550

2.5%


GeForce GT
710

2.5%

User rating


Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/phenom-ii-x4-925%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 7
3700X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










Phenom II X4 925 [in 3 benchmarks]

AMD
Phenom II X4 925

  • Interface
  • Core frequency
  • Video memory size
  • Memory type
  • Memory frequency
  • Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD Phenom II X4 925 sales in May 2009at a suggested price of $160. This is a desktop processor based on the Deneb architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 45 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2800 MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket AM3 processor with a TDP of 95W. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

2.18%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


Phenom II
X4 925

vs


EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of Phenom II X4 925, as well as sales start time and cost at that time. 9(13 years ago) The price at the time of release $ 160 (Core i7-870) price now 31 $ (0. 2x) out of 18494 (Xeon Platinum 8280M)

Value for money

To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Features

Phenom II X4 925 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment it is necessary to consider the results of the tests.

) 45 nm

5.

Depending on the motherboard, a higher memory frequency may be supported.

of 12288 (Core 2 QUAD Q9550)
CASH 3rd level 6 MB (total) of 32 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
out of 5 (Apple M1)
Crystal size 258 mm 2
RAM DDR3 of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600x)

Tests in benchmark

These are the results of the Phenom II X4 925 non-gaming benchmarks. The total score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.


Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 925
2.18

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

Phenom II X4 925
2196

GeekBench 5 Single Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Phenom II X4 925
380

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Phenom II X4 925
1294


Mining hashrates

Phenom II X4 925 performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 3.2 Mh/s

Relative capacity

Overall Phenom II X4 925 performance compared to its nearest competitor desktop processors.


Intel Core i5-650
100.92

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
100.46

AMD Athlon II X4 640
100.46

AMD Phenom II X4 925
100

Intel Pentium G4400TE
99.54

AMD A8-3820
99.54

Intel Pentium G3460
99.54

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Phenom II X4 925 from Intel is Pentium G4400TE, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our rating.


Pentium
G4400TE

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the Phenom II X4 925:

Intel Core i5-650
100. 92

Intel Celeron G3930TE
100.92

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
100.46

AMD Phenom II X4 925
100

Intel Pentium G3460
99.54

Intel Pentium G4400TE
99.54

Intel Celeron G3900
99.08

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.


Athlon II
X4 640

Compare


A8
3820

Compare


Core i5
650

Compare


Athlon II
X3 425e

Compare


Core i3
3220

Compare


Athlon II
X4 635

Compare

Recommended video cards

According to our statistics these video cards are most often used with Phenom II X4 925:


GeForce GTX
750 Ti

5. 8%


GeForce GTS
450

5.5%


GeForce GTX
550 Ti

4.9%


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

4.7%


GeForce GTX
650

3.7%


GeForce GT
730

3.2%


GeForce GT
1030

2.8%


GeForce GTS
250

2.6%


Radeon RX
550

2.5%


GeForce GT
710

2.5%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.