Quadro k2000 vs 4000: Quadro 4000 vs Quadro K2000 Graphics cards Comparison

Quadro 4000 vs Quadro K2000 Graphics cards Comparison

When comparing Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro 4000

Check Price

Quadro K2000

Check Price

Main Specs

  Quadro 4000 Quadro K2000
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 51 Watt
Interface PCIe 2. 0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • Quadro 4000 has 178% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro 4000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2000 — with Kepler.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 479 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
  • Quadro 4000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000 — by 28 nm process technology.
  • Quadro 4000 is 39 mm longer, than Quadro K2000.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 1192 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 6−7 7−8
ultra / 1080p 4−5 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 16−18 16−18
medium / 1080p 8−9 9−10
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p 12−14 12−14
ultra / 1080p 10−11 10−12
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 24−27 24−27
medium / 1080p 12−14 12−14
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
high / 1080p 45−50 45−50
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 130−140 140−150
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 50−55 55−60
QHD / 1440p 27−30 30−35
4K / 2160p 27−30 27−30
high / 768p 80−85 85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p 55−60 55−60
ultra / 1080p 18−20 21−24
medium / 1080p 45−50 45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p 80−85 80−85
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 30−35 35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p 8−9 9−10
ultra / 1080p 7−8 8−9
4K / 2160p 3−4 4−5
low / 720p 18−20 20−22
medium / 1080p 9−10 9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p 14−16 14−16
ultra / 1080p 10−11 10−12
low / 720p 60−65 60−65
medium / 1080p 21−24 24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Fortnite is 3% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p 12−14 12−14
ultra / 1080p 10−12 10−12
QHD / 1440p 1−2 1−2
low / 720p 24−27 27−30
medium / 1080p 14−16 14−16
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p 50−55 55−60
medium / 768p 45−50 45−50
high / 1080p 12−14 12−14
ultra / 1080p 6−7 7−8
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p 5−6 5−6
ultra / 1080p 3−4 3−4
4K / 2160p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 12−14 12−14
medium / 1080p 6−7 7−8
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p 95−100 95−100
high / 1080p 90−95 90−95
ultra / 1080p 80−85 80−85
medium / 1080p 90−95 90−95
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p 16−18 16−18
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 30−35 30−35
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p 7−8 7−8
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 12−14 12−14
medium / 1080p 10−12 10−12
Quadro 4000 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p 24−27 27−30
medium / 768p 16−18 18−20
high / 1080p 9−10 10−11
ultra / 1080p 6−7 6−7
4K / 2160p 6−7 6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p 85−90 85−90
medium / 768p 45−50 45−50
ultra / 1080p 18−20 20−22
high / 768p 35−40 35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro 4000.

Full Specs

  Quadro 4000 Quadro K2000
Architecture Fermi Kepler
Code name GF100 GK107
Type Workstation Workstation
Release date 2 November 2010 1 March 2013
Pipelines 256 384
Core clock speed 475 MHz 954 MHz
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 15. 20 30.53
Floating-point performance 486.4 gflops 732.7 gflops
Length 241 mm 202 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2808 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 89.86 GB/s 64 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 1.2
Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
CUDA 2.0 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 44 Mh/s 24 Mh/s
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • Quadro 4000 vs Radeon HD 7870M
  • Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
  • Quadro K2000 vs Radeon HD 7870M
  • Quadro K2000 vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
  • Quadro 4000 vs GeForce GT 755M
  • Quadro 4000 vs Radeon E8860
  • Quadro K2000 vs GeForce GT 755M
  • Quadro K2000 vs Radeon E8860

Nvidia Quadro 4000 vs Nvidia Quadro K2000: What is the difference?

27points

Nvidia Quadro 4000

30points

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia Quadro 4000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

Why is Nvidia Quadro 4000 better than Nvidia Quadro K2000?

  • 25. 9GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    89.9GB/svs64GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus width?
    256bitvs128bit
  • 1830million more transistors?
    3100 millionvs1270 million
  • 16 more render output units (ROPs)?
    32vs16
  • 282 higher PassMark (G3D) result?
    1917vs1635

Why is Nvidia Quadro K2000 better than Nvidia Quadro 4000?

  • 479MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    954MHzvs475MHz
  • 0.25 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    0.73 TFLOPSvs0.49 TFLOPS
  • 91W lower TDP?
    51Wvs142W
  • 298MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1000MHzvs702MHz
  • 1192MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    4000MHzvs2808MHz
  • 15.3 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    30.5 GTexels/svs15.2 GTexels/s
  • 128 more shading units?
    384vs256
  • 12nm smaller semiconductor size?
    28nmvs40nm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro K4000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro P5000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia Quadro 2000

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia Quadro M2000

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro M6000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro 2000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro M4000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia Quadro K2000D

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro 600

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

475MHz

954MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

7.6 GPixel/s

7.63 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

0.49 TFLOPS

0.73 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

15.2 GTexels/s

30.5 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

702MHz

1000MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

2808MHz

4000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2. maximum memory bandwidth

89.9GB/s

64GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia Quadro 4000

✔Nvidia Quadro K2000

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Nvidia Quadro 4000

✔Nvidia Quadro K2000

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5. DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000


Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Buy on Amazon


vs

NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 810 MHz
  • Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 80 Watt



Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 810 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt vs 80 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

  • Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 51. 84 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
  • Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 4000 MHz
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 2700 vs 1562
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 420 vs 379
  • Around 44% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 5875 vs 4071
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.451 vs 14.327
  • Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 427.88 vs 265.424
  • Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.898 vs 1.078
  • Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.742 vs 15.009
  • Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.898 vs 37.514
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2446
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1631
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1974
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2446
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1631
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1974




















Texture fill rate 51.84 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,244 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5616 MHz vs 4000 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark 2700 vs 1562
PassMark — G2D Mark 420 vs 379
Geekbench — OpenCL 5875 vs 4071
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.451 vs 14.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 427.88 vs 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.898 vs 1.078
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 23.742 vs 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 61.898 vs 37.514
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3798 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3651 vs 1631
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3321 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3798 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3651 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3321 vs 1974

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000















PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

14.327

18.451

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

265.424

427.88

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

15.009

23.742

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

37.514

61.898

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


















Name NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark — G3D Mark 1562 2700
PassMark — G2D Mark 379 420
Geekbench — OpenCL 4071 5875
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.327 18.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 265.424 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.078 1.898
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.009 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 37.514 61.898
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2446 3798
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 1631 3651
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1974 3321
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2446 3798
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 1631 3651
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1974 3321
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 0 817

Compare specifications (specs)





























NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK107 GK106
Launch date 1 March 2013 1 March 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $599 $1,269
Place in performance rating 1097 779
Price now $164. 99 $225.65
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 11.74 14.81
Core clock speed 954 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops 1,244 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 768
Texture fill rate 30. 53 GTexel / s 51.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 2,540 million
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 202 mm 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
DirectX 12. 0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 134.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 5616 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K4000 GPU Comparison

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000 3 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 140

$ 82.71
significantly less expensive

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

8 %

60%
significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS

4 FPS
significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

2 FPS
significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

114 FPS

109 FPS
significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

5 FPS

2 FPS
significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000 and the Quadro K4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Geekbench (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

5,210

70%
significantly higher Geekbench (CUDA) score

Geekbench (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

3,574

74%
significantly higher Geekbench (Metal) score

Geekbench (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6,816

67%
significantly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score

Geekbench (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6,504

75%
significantly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

3 GiB

49%
significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

192 Bit

49%
significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

135 GB/s

110%
significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

56%
significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

8 Gigapixels/s

13 Gigapixels/s

69%
significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

31 Gigatexels/s

52 Gigatexels/s

69%
significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

100%
significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64

100%
significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

24

49%
significantly more render output processors

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

339th
of 526

283rd
of 526

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

March 2013

March 2013

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11. 0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.5


Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K4000 benchmarks

For gaming, the Quadro K4000 graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000 in our tests.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro K4000 has significantly more memory with 3 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn’t directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro K2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Quadro K4000 at 80 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K4000 is faster than the Quadro K2000.

Latest posts

How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022

How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022

Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022

Popular GPU Comparisons

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs AMD FirePro W4100.

GPU Comparison Specs & Benchmark

VS

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

AMD FirePro W4100

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro K2000  vs  AMD FirePro W4100.

532

Place in performance rating

534

12.99

Value for money (0-100)

6.55

Kepler

Architecture

GCN

GK107

Code name

Cape Verde

Workstation

Type

Workstation

1 March 2013 (8 years ago)

Release date

2 October 2015 (6 years ago)

$599

Launch price (MSRP)

no data

$1172 (2x MSRP)

Price now

$212

0.23

Value for money

4.56

GK107

GPU code name

Cape Verde

Workstation

Market segment

Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro K2000  vs  AMD FirePro W4100 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384

Pipelines

512

954 MHz

Core clock speed

630 MHz

1,270 million

Transistor count

1,500 million

28 nm

Manufacturing process technology

28 nm

51 Watt

Power consumption (TDP)

50 Watt

30.53

Texture fill rate

20.16

732.7 gflops

Floating-point performance

645.1 gflops

384

Pipelines / CUDA cores

512

1,270 million

Number of transistors

1,500 million

51 Watt

Thermal design power (TDP)

400 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16

Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

202 mm

Length

171 mm

None

Supplementary power connectors

None

no data

Bus support

PCIe 3.0

no data

Form factor

low profile / half length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs AMD FirePro W4100.

GDDR5

Memory type

GDDR5

2 GB

Maximum RAM amount

2 GB

128 Bit

Memory bus width

128 Bit

4000 MHz

Memory clock speed

4000 MHz

64 GB/s

Memory bandwidth

72 GB/s

no data

Shared memory

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What’s the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs AMD FirePro W4100.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

no data

Dual-link DVI support

1

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data

AppAcceleration

+

no data

PowerPlay

+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and AMD FirePro W4100 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

+

Vulkan

1.2.131

no data

Shader Model

5.1

no data

OpenCL

1.2

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 versus AMD FirePro W4100 performance benchmarks comparison

Popular comparisons containing this graphics cards

1. NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs. AMD FirePro W4100
2. NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs. AMD FirePro W4100
3. NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs. NVIDIA Quadro P520
4. NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
5. AMD Cypress vs. AMD FirePro W4100
6. AMD Baffin vs. AMD FirePro W4100
7. NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs. AMD Radeon HD 7660G
8. NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs. AMD Radeon 540X
9. AMD Cedar vs. AMD FirePro W4100
10. AMD Tonga vs. AMD FirePro W4100
11. NVIDIA NVS 810 vs. AMD FirePro W4100
12. AMD Radeon HD 8400 vs. NVIDIA Quadro K2000
13. AMD Bonaire vs. AMD FirePro W4100
14. AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs. NVIDIA Quadro K2000
15. AMD Cayman vs. AMD FirePro W4100

VGA Bios Collection: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 1024 MB

  • VGA BIOS Collection
  • Quadro 4000
  • NVIDIA Quadro 4000
  • NVIDIA Quadro 4000 1024 MB BIOS

Warning: You are viewing an unverified BIOS file.

This upload has not been verified by us in any way (like we do for the entries listed under the ‘AMD’, ‘ATI’ and ‘NVIDIA’ sections).
Please exercise caution when flashing it to your graphics card, and always have a backup.

Filename: 163865.rom
VBIOS Version: 70.06.3F.00.01
UEFI Supported: No
BIOS Build date: 2011-06-24 00:00:00
Date added: 2014-11-02 15:20:31
VBIOS Size: 59 KB
MD5 Hash: 1a368aa0eac41ecc6232f30e737ddfac
SHA1 Hash: 0e68a83b300abd3ed6751761cfa78c253c8572f0
Same Bios: PNY Quadro 2000, Leadtek Quadro K2000, HP Quadro K2000, Lenovo Quadro 2000

Placeholder picture (may not match the card exactly)

View all Quadro 2000 specs in our GPU Database

GPU Device Id: 0x10DE 0x0DD8
Version: 70. 06.3F.00.01
GF106 P1232 QS VGA BIOS
Copyright (C) 1996-2011 NVIDIA Corp.
GF106 Board — 12320500
Connectors
1x DVI-I
2x DisplayPort
Fan Speed
Min: 30%
Max: 100%
Memory Support
GDDR5, Samsung
GDDR5, Unknown
GDDR5, Hynix
Performance Level 0
Core Clk: 51.00 MHz
Mem Clk: 68.00 MHz
Shader Clk: 101.00 MHz
Voltage: 0.8500 V
Performance Level 1
Core Clk: 405.00 MHz
Mem Clk: 162.00 MHz
Shader Clk: 810.00 MHz
Voltage: by ASIC (0.8625 V — 0.8875 V)
Performance Level 3
Core Clk: 626.00 MHz
Mem Clk: 652.00 MHz
Shader Clk: 1251.00 MHz
Voltage: by ASIC (0.8625 V — 0.9750 V)
User Voltage limit: below 1.0250 V
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Model: Quadro 4000
Device Id: 10DE 0DD8
Subsystem Id: 10DE 084A
Interface: PCI-E
Memory Size: 1024 MB
GPU Clock: 626 MHz
Memory Clock: 652 MHz
Memory Type: GDDR5

NVIDIA, Quadro 4000, NVIDIA Quadro 2000,

Download Now
or Find compatible BIOS

Oct 3rd, 2022 16:40 CEST
change timezone

Sign in / Register

  • NVIDIA GeForce 517. 48 WHQL
  • AMD Radeon 22.9.2 Beta
  • Intel
    IGP 101.3430
    /
    Arc 101.3430


  • by
    Ferather

    5 headphones into windows 10 (11)


  • by
    WhiteNoise

    GPUs: what is enough? (34)


  • by
    WhiteNoise

    Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 ?? (15)


  • by
    Arco

    Want to upgrade, but not sure to what and in what order. (1)


  • by
    windwhirl

    TPU’s WCG/BOINC Team (34091)


  • by
    Lenne

    TPU’s Nostalgic Hardware Club (15344)


  • by
    Bill_Bright

    Setup Gigabit fiber over a direct MOCA 2. 5 connection? (9)


  • by
    freeagent

    Ryzen Owners Zen Garden (4587)


  • by
    robot zombie

    What are you playing? (16130)


  • by
    INSTG8R

    Upgrade to 5600X or 5800X3D — gaming purpose 1440P/144HZ (12)

  • AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Review — Impressive 16-core Powerhouse
  • Asus Prime AP201 Review
  • AMD Ryzen 5 7600X Review — Affordable Zen 4 for Gaming
  • AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Review — The Best Zen 4 for Gaming
  • Intel Arc A750 & A770 Unboxing & Preview
  • Red Dead Redemption 2: DLSS vs. FSR 2.0 Comparison Review
  • ASRock NUC BOX-1260P Barebones Mini-PC (Intel Alder Lake) Review
  • Upcoming Hardware Launches 2022 (Updated Aug 2022)
  • Gigabyte Z690I AORUS Ultra Plus DDR4 Review
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review — Creator Might, Priced Right
  • EVGA Announces Cancelation of NVIDIA Next-gen Graphics Cards Plans, Officially Terminates NVIDIA Partnership
    (535)
  • NVIDIA Project Beyond GTC Keynote Address: Expect the Expected (RTX 4090)
    (332)
  • Intel 13th Gen Core «Raptor Lake» Desktop Processors Launched: +15% ST, +41% MT Uplift
    (167)
  • NVIDIA AD103 and AD104 Chips Powering RTX 4080 Series Detailed
    (152)
  • Microsoft Unveils the Windows 11 2022 Update, Available Today
    (135)
  • Key Slides from Intel 13th Gen «Raptor Lake» Launch Presentation Leak
    (125)
  • Google Calls it Quits on Game Streaming, Shutting Down Stadia
    (124)
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU-Z Benched, Falls Short of Core i7-12700K in ST, Probably Due to Temperature Throttling
    (123)

Nvidia Quadro 4000 vs Nvidia Quadro K2000: What is the difference?

27 BALLLA

NVIDIA QUADRO 4000

30 BALLLA

NVIDIA QUADRO K2000

VS

54 Facts compared to

NVIDIA QUADRO 4000 9000 K2000 9000

more than nvidia Qu

  • 25. 9GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    89.9GB/s vs 64GB/s
  • 128bit wider memory bus?
    256bit vs 128bit
  • 1830million more transistors?
    3100M vs 1270M
  • 16 more ROPs?
    32 vs 16
  • 282 higher PassMark (G3D) score?
    1917 vs 1635

  • GPU frequency 479MHz higher?
    954MHz vs 475MHz
  • 0.25 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
    0.73 TFLOPS vs 0.49 TFLOPS
  • 91W below TDP?
    51W vs 142W
  • 298MHz faster memory speed?
    1000MHz vs 702MHz
  • 1192MHz higher effective clock speed?
    4000MHz vs 2808MHz
  • 15.3 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
    30.5 GTexels/s vs 15.2 GTexels/s
  • 128 more stream processors?
    384 vs 256
  • Are 12nm semiconductors smaller?
    28nm vs 40nm

Which comparisons are the most popular?

NVIDIA QUADRO 4000

VS

NVIDIA Q4000

NVIDIA Q2000

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 750 TI

NVIDIA QUADRO 4000

VS

9000 NVIDI0003

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia Quadro 2000

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs AMD Radeon Pro

0003

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro M6000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Nvidia Quadro 4000

vs

Nvidia Quadro 2000

Nvidia Quadro K2000

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming0003

2. turbo GPU

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

7.6 GPixel/s

7.63 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

0.49 TFLOPS

0.73 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

15.2 GTexels/s

30.5 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

702MHz

1000MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs imaging units

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

2808MHz

4000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

89.9GB/s

64GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1. DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Nvidia Quadro 4000

✔Nvidia Quadro K2000

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Nvidia Quadro 4000

✔Nvidia Quadro K2000

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1. has HDMI output

✖Nvidia Quadro 4000

✖Nvidia Quadro K2000

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

2.HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

3rd HDMI version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 4000)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro K2000)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort 9 outputs0003

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6. outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

Comparison of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

  • Newer graphics card, release date difference 5 year(s) 8 month(s) 90 5% more core frequency 90 527 90 527 MHz vs 954 MHz
  • 7287.9 ​​times more texture speed: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
  • 6 times more shader processors: 2304 vs 384 912 nm vs 28 nm 19.7 times greater: 80254 vs 4071
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 19.7 times greater: 282.628 vs 14.327
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 — Surface Ocean Desktop Benchmark (Frames/s) 12.8 times bigger: 3403.106 vs 265.424
  • 22.9x better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 24.719 vs 1.078
  • 9.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark 26.9 times more: 136.919 vs 15.009
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark 26.9 times more: 1010.818 vs 37.514
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8.3 times a) more: 20206 vs 2446
  • About 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3714 vs 1631
  • About 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3359 vs 1974
  • 9002 8.3x greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 20206 vs 2446

  • 2.3x greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3714 vs 1631
  • Performance in GFXBenchmark 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) about 70% more: 3359vs 1974
Issue date 13 November 2018 vs 1 March 2013
Core clock 1005 MHz vs 954 MHz
Texturing speed 222. 5 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel/s
Number of shaders 2304 vs 384
Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 8GB vs 2GB
Geekbench — OpenCL 80254 vs 4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 282.628 vs 14.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3403.106 vs 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.719 vs 1.078
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 136.919 vs 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1010.818 vs 37.514
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20206 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20206 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 1631
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 1974

reasons to select NVIDIA QUADRO K2000

  • at 3.1 times less energy consumption: 51 WATT VS 160 WATT
  • Memory frequency by 2.5 times more: 4000 MHZ VS 1625 MHZ (13000 MHZ EFFECTIVE)
  • 9049

    Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt vs 160 Watt Memory frequency 4000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
    GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

    Geekbench — OpenCL
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    282.628
    14.327
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    3403.106
    265.424
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    24. 719
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    136.919
    15.009
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    1010.818
    37.514
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
    Geekbench — OpenCL 80254 4071
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 282.628 14.327
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3403.106 265.424
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.719 1.078
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 136.919 15.009
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1010.818 37.514
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20206 2446
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3714 1631
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 1974
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20206 2446
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3714 1631
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 1974
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 7843 0
    PassMark — G3D Mark 1562
    PassMark — G2D Mark 379

    Feature comparison

    NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
    Architecture Turing Kepler
    Codename TU104 GK107
    Generation GCN Quadro RTX
    Issue date November 13, 2018 March 1, 2013
    Price at first issue date $899 $599
    Place in the rating 89 1097
    Type Desktop Workstation
    Price now $164. 99
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 11.74
    Core clock in Boost mode 1545 MHz
    Core clock 1005 MHz 954MHz
    Process 12nm 28nm
    Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 222.5GFLOPS
    Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 14.24TFLOPS
    Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7. 119 TFLOPS
    Number of shaders 2304 384
    Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
    Render output units 64
    Texturing speed 222.5 GTexel/s 30.53 GTexel/s
    Texture Units 144
    Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 51 Watt
    Number of transistors 13600 million 1,270 million
    Floating point performance 732. 7 gflops
    Video connectors 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Length 9.5 inches (241 mm) 202 mm
    Additional power connectors 1x 8-pin None
    DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
    OpenCL 1.2
    OpenGL 4. 6 4.6
    Shader Model 6.4
    Vulcan
    Maximum memory size 8GB 2GB
    Memory bandwidth 416.0 GB/s 64 GB/s
    Memory bus width 256bit 128 Bit
    Memory frequency 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) 4000 MHz
    Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

    Nvidia quadro k2200 driver windows 10 64 bit

    This is a reference driver that can be installed on supported NVIDIA notebook GPUs. However, please note that your notebook original equipment manufacturer (OEM) provides certified drivers for your specific notebook on their website. NVIDIA recommends that you check with your notebook OEM about recommended software updates for your notebook. OEMs may not provide technical support for issues that arise from the use of this driver.

    Quadro K6000, Quadro K5200, Quadro K5000, Quadro K4000, Quadro K4200, Quadro K2200, Quadro K2000, Quadro K2000D, Quadro K620, Quadro K600, Quadro K420, Quadro 6000, Quadro 5000, Quadro 4000, Quadro 200 Quadro 600, Quadro 410, Quadro 400 9Quadro K5100M, Quadro K5000M, Quadro K4100M, Quadro K4000M, Quadro K3100M, Quadro K2100M, Quadro K3000M, Quadro K2000M, Quadro K1100M, Quadro K1000M, Quadro K510, Quadro K51

    Quadro CX, Quadro FX 370, Quadro FX 370 Low Profile, Quadro FX 380, Quadro FX 380 Low Profile, Quadro FX 570, Quadro FX 580, Quadro FX 580 FX 1700, Quadro FX 1800, Quadro FX 3700, Quadro FX 3800, Quadro FX 4600, Quadro FX 4700 X2, Quadro FX 4800, Quadro FX 5600, Quadro FX 5800

    Quadro FX Series (Notebooks):

    Quadro FX 3800M Quadro FX 3700M Quadro FX 3600M Quadro FX 2800M Quadro FX 2700M Quadro FX 1800M Quadro FX 1700M , Quadro FX 570M, Quadro FX 380M, Quadro FX 370M, Quadro FX 360M FX 880M, Quadro FX 2800M, Quadro FX 3600M

    Quadro NVS 290, Quadro NVS 295, NVS 510, NVS 315, NVS 310, NVS 300, Quadro NVS 420, Quadro NVS 450 , NVS 3100M, NVS 2100M, Quadro NVS 320M, Quadro NVS 160M, Quadro NVS 150M, Quadro NVS 140M, Quadro NVS 135M, Quadro NVS 130M 300, Quadro NVS 420, Quadro NVS 450

    NVS Series (Notebooks):

    NVS 5400M, NVS 5200M, NVS 5100M, NVS 4200M, NVS 3100M, NVS 2100M, Quadro NVS 320M, QuadroM5 NVS 140M, Quadro NVS 135M, Quadro NVS 130M

    Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release Windows 10 R352

    Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release Windows 10 R352

    Version: R352 U3 (353. 62) WHQL
    Release Date: 2015.7.29
    Operating System : Windows 10 64-bit1442 235.71 MB

    New in this driver:

    New in R352 branch:

    Quadro M6000, Quadro K6000, Quadro K5200, Quadro K5000, Quadro K4000 Quadro K4200 Quadro K2200 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D Quadro K1200 Quadro K620 Quadro K600 Quadro K420 Quadro 6000 Quadro 5000 Quadro 4000 Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000D Quadro 600 Quadro 410

    (Notebooks): 9Release 375 is from the ‘Optimal Drivers for Enterprise’ [ODE] branch. ODE branches are dedicated to relatively long term stability for ISV certification, OEMs, and Enterprise customers.

    Release version R375 U5 includes:

    For Quadro Notebook:
    This is a reference driver that can be installed on supported NVIDIA notebook GPUs. However, please note that your notebook original equipment manufacturer (OEM) provides certified drivers for your specific notebook on their website. NVIDIA recommends that you check with your notebook OEM about recommended software updates for your notebook. OEMs may not provide technical support for issues that arise from the use of this driver.

    Before downloading this driver:
    Please check to make sure that your notebook has a supported GPU (refer to theProducts Supportedtab below).

    Quadro GP100, Quadro P6000, Quadro P5000, Quadro P4000, Quadro P2000, Quadro P1000, Quadro P600, Quadro P400, Quadro M6000 24GB, Quadro M6000, Quadro M5000, Quadro M4000, Quadro M2000, Quadro K0, Quadro K5020 , Quadro K4000 Quadro K4200 Quadro K2200 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D Quadro K1200 Quadro K620 Quadro K600 Quadro K420 Quadro 6000 Quadro 50000003

    Quadro Series (Notebooks):

    Quadro P5000 Quadro P4000 Quadro P3000 Quadro M2200 Quadro M1200 Quadro M620 Quadro M5500 Quadro M5000M Quadro M4000M Quadro M3000M Quadro K5100M, Quadro K5000M, Quadro K4100M, Quadro K4000M, Quadro K3100M, Quadro K2200M, Quadro K2100M, Quadro K3000M, Quadro K2000M, Quadro K1100M, Quadro K1000M, Quadro K620 QuaM, Quadro K610M, QuadroM0,510 Quadro 5000M, Quadro 4000M, Quadro 3000M, Quadro 2000M

    Quadro Blade/Embedded Series :

    Quadro M5000 SE, Quadro M3000 SE, Quadro K3100M, Quadro 500M, Quadro 1000M, Quadro 3000M, Quadro 4000M

    NVS 510, NVS 315, NVS 310

    Quadro NVS Series (Notebooks)

    NVS 5400M, NVS 5200M, NVS 4200M

    Quadro Plex Series:

    Quadro Sync Series:

    Quadro Sync II, Quadro Sync, Quadro G-Sync II, Quadro G-Sync I

    4 Video Source

    The NVIDIA graphics driver cannot be installed. Causes and solution

    How to install NVIDIA GEFORCE drivers correctly

    QUADRO K2200 graphics card

    Unable to proceed with NVIDIA installation — solution

    How to install drivers on Windows 10 | Video card nvidia quad K2000

    NVIDIA graphics card driver not installed. solution 100{f93da0a36f3d82cb85c48a2456ab85c5442d1026dc9f4351d9fb2eeade79e93e} WORKING METHOD ON WINDOWS 10 2021

    How to update driver on Nvidia Quadro. Workstation assembly 8

    How to properly install drivers for NVIDIA 2022 video cards

    Download NVIDIA drivers from the official website and install

    Old video card in a new PC? We install the old drivers on Windows 10

    share or save to yourself:

    Article «Testing of professional video cards NVIDIA and AMD in Popular Continents ) 2013 (July-August)


    Testing NVIDIA and AMD professional graphics cards in popular professional applications

    Introduction

    Our laboratory is one of the few dedicated to testing not only gaming, but also professional accelerators. However, over the past few years, we have had to pay attention exclusively to professional solutions manufactured by NVIDIA, and AMD of a similar purpose remained in the shadows.

    But the quality of our reviews practically did not suffer. The fact is that the professional graphics AMD is not particularly popular, the share of this company in the corresponding market segment has fluctuated around 15% over the past few years (and in Russia in general it is about 5%), that is, it is many times inferior to the share of NVIDIA. And this situation did not arise out of nowhere. The professional segment, which requires special treatment, turned out to be practically lost for AMD because the company did not pay enough attention to the dialogue with professional users, hoping that its video cards will sell themselves due to the excellent combination of cost and performance. But in the world of cards for high-performance graphics workstations, this approach is ineffective.

    The main factors for professional graphics are high performance in CAD/CAM systems and excellent support. And with this, the affairs of the AMD were far from being the best. The company did not actively cooperate with the developers of professional software packages, which led to the lack of necessary optimizations in the drivers. As a result, on the one hand, the performance suffered, and on the other hand, there were problems with the certification of the company’s solutions.

    Now the situation is gradually changing. AMD not only updated the corresponding line by moving it to the modern Southern Islands base, but also began to actively interact with developers of CAD / CAM systems, adding specific optimizations and functions to professional drivers.

    However, this review owes its appearance not only to this. Over the past time, NVIDIA has significantly increased its portfolio of new generation professional accelerators based on the Kepler architecture. Unlike AMD , which has so far focused on performance cards, NVIDIA is now able to offer a wide variety of CAD and simulation hardware solutions.

    As a result, we can present an extensive comparative testing of professional graphics cards, including AMD FirePro W8000 , AMD FirePro W7000 , NVIDIA Quadro K5000 , NVIDIA Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000 1714 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 . In other words, we will compare CAD/CAM cards from both manufacturers in the price range from $170 to $1800. This will help to correctly interpret the data obtained in practice.

    How we tested

    We tested professional graphics cards using a workstation based on the fastest Intel Core i7-39 six-core desktop processor to date70X Extreme Edition clocked at 3.5 GHz. In addition, the test platform used a motherboard based on the Intel X79 Express chipset and 16 GB of high-speed DDR3-1867 SDRAM.

    Drivers:

    • AMD FirePro Display Driver 9.003.3.3;
    • AMD 3ds Max 2010 and 3ds Max 2011 performance plugin;
    • NVIDIA Quadro/NVS/Tesla/GRID Desktop Driver Release 320.00;
    • NVIDIA 3ds Max Performance Driver 13.00.04.

    Video cards were tested at 1920×1200 with Vsync turned off. In this case, tests specially developed by the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPECviewperf 11.0) were used. The charts below show test scores. However, a larger value always indicates better performance.

    Performance

    Since its inception, the SPECviewperf synthetic benchmark has become the de facto industry standard for primary evaluation of graphics workstation performance. Simulating fairly primitive operations, this test shows the «pure geometric» performance of accelerators when working through OpenGL, which is determined by both hardware features and the quality of driver optimization. A feature of this test is the transfer to the graphics driver of pre-formed OpenGL sequences of commands that set the rotation of complex models that are typical for certain professional applications.

    The scripts built into SPECviewperf of the eleventh version we use simulate the user’s activity in projection windows in the following professional applications (the names of the corresponding tests are given in brackets): (ensight-04), Maya (maya-03), Pro/ENGINEER (proe-05), SOLIDWORKS (sw-03), SiemensTeamcenterVisualizationMockup (tcvis-02), and SiemensNX (snx-01).

    Synthetic tests put NVIDIA’s professional accelerators in higher positions than AMD FirePro series cards. In fact, judging by the results of SPECviewperf, the performance of the FirePro W8000 and W7000 is only at the level of the Quadro K2000 , which somewhat contradicts their positioning. Moreover, AMD cards belonging to different price categories and based on different chips demonstrate very close performance indicators in many scenarios. This is due to the peculiarities of the SPECviewperf test, which generates a rather primitive command stream that creates a load mainly on GPU raster operations units and practically does not involve shader processors. Modern versions of CAD / CAM packages are gradually moving away from such rendering mechanisms, and in reality, the shader domain of professional accelerators is starting to play an increasingly important role. By the way, this is what she herself says AMD , justifying the not-so-best performance of the new FirePro in SPECviewperf. In other words, this benchmark cannot be the ultimate truth and does not replace testing in applications.

    Meanwhile, despite all its shortcomings, the SPECviewperf 11.0 test allows you to find out what effect the inclusion of full-screen anti-aliasing (FSAA) has on performance. The graphs below illustrate the change in the results of standard tests included in SPECviewperf when various FSAA modes are activated.

    The difference in the behavior of professional accelerators from different manufacturers when full-screen anti-aliasing modes are activated is curious. NVIDIA cards behave quite naturally: their performance decreases as the complexity of anti-aliasing increases. But 3D accelerators of the FirePro series often demonstrate approximately the same performance at different levels of anti-aliasing. In addition, they do not support anti-aliasing modes, starting with sixteen times. All this suggests that driver 9The 1713 FirePro W-series shares a lot of code with the Catalyst game driver. Indeed, the behavior of the FirePro in SPECviewperf is more typical for gaming graphics cards than for professional ones.

    In other words, NVIDIA is optimizing its own software for professional OpenGL as a whole, while AMD seems to focus on performance in separate packages, inheriting the implementation of many functions from the game driver engine. Both approaches have the right to life, but it should be borne in mind that in any highly specialized and individually developed programs that require high speed in OpenGL, with maps FirePro potentially has more problems than Quadro series products.

    Power consumption

    In terms of power consumption of professional video accelerators in the same price category, the Quadro series solutions seem to be significantly more economical. A system with Quadro K5000 consumes less than FirePro W8000 equivalent platform, and Quadro K4000 requires less than 9 W of power.1713 FirePro W7000 , 34W. The energy efficiency of the Quadro series is not hidden by NVIDIA itself, ranking it among the advantages of new solutions. Actually, nothing else was expected: the characteristics of the GPU used in the cards of the Quadro series are far from the maximum possible, and the boards themselves do without connecting a couple of additional power cables.

    The boards of the FirePro series are quite similar in design to gaming accelerators. Therefore, it turns out that their level of heat dissipation and power consumption is not much different from the cards of the Radeon HD series. Thus, workstations using AMD solutions will be hotter and noisier than their counterparts that use family 9 professional graphics cards.1713 Quadro .

    Conclusions

    NVIDIA is a leader in the professional graphics accelerator market. And this is no coincidence. As we have seen from our own experience, this manufacturer can provide very high-quality adaptation of its own architectures to the needs of professional users working in three-dimensional engineering packages for design, modeling and design. Thanks to NVIDIA’s comprehensive approach to driver and hardware optimization, we once again have a balanced line of professional video cards of different prices, offering different levels of performance.

    AMD cannot boast of such a solid strategy yet. Unfortunately, our laboratory did not wait for the mid-range model FirePro W5000 from this manufacturer, but what we saw on the example of FirePro W7000 and W8000 is somewhat discouraging. These two graphics cards, which cost almost twice as much, often show very close speeds in real professional applications. As a result, the FirePro W8000, which, based on the price, should compete with Quadro K5000 , according to its data, frankly, does not shine. But the FirePro W7000 often shows higher performance than the Quadro K4000 belonging to the same price category. And that makes the FirePro W7000 a fairly attractive mid-range professional card. However, if you are looking for higher performance in the upper price segment, the Quadro K5000 should be your choice. Of course, we cannot fail to note desire AMD to gain a foothold in the market of professional video accelerators. However, in order for the FirePro series to earn its rightful place in a wide range of professional workstations, more significant efforts are obviously needed. The overall optimization of the OpenGL driver for AMD professional graphics accelerators is still not very good, as evidenced by the results of synthetic tests. And besides, AMD does not yet pay due attention to the heat dissipation and power consumption of its products, and according to these parameters, accelerators 9The 1713 FirePro is significantly outperformed by the Quadro . Another advantage of the strategy chosen by NVIDIA is that the company also has low-cost professional cards built on the most modern Kepler architecture in its lineup, which fully support all the latest graphics technologies. While AMD’s in the lower price segment relies on the implementation of discounted video cards of past generations, NVIDIA brings to the market very attractive solutions like Quadro K2000 and Quadro K600 . Such inexpensive professional accelerators are able to attract attention, first of all, with a very favorable combination of price and performance.

    Thus, the NVIDIA Quadro line of accelerators of 2013, which is based on the most modern Kepler architecture, remains a traditionally solid offer for the market of professional graphics stations. Accelerators of the FirePro W series, with which the company AMD plans to improve its market position, they have good prospects only in the middle price segment.

    Ilya Gavrichenkov
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Abridged version of the review published on the website of the company
    F-Center (www.fcenter.ru)

    NVIDIA Quadro K2000 – review. Benchmarks and Specifications

    The NVIDIA Quadro K2000 graphics card (GPU) is ranked 443 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. Runs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 with a minimum clock speed of 954 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. The RAM size is 2 GB GB with a clock speed of 4000 MHz and a bandwidth of 64 GB/s.

    The power consumption of NVIDIA Quadro K2000 is 51 Watt and the process technology is only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.

    Let’s take a closer look at the most important features of the NVIDIA Quadro K2000. To have an idea of ​​which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.

    3.9
    From 18
    Hitesti Grade

    Popular video cards

    Most viewed

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

    Intel UHD Graphics 630

    Intel UHD Graphics 600

    NVIDIA Quadro T1000

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

    NVIDIA GeForce MX330

    Intel HD Graphics 530

    Intel UHD Graphics 620

    Intel HD Graphics 4600

    Intel HD Graphics 520

    Buy here:

    AliExpress

    General information

    The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.

    Performance Rating Position: 532
    Value for money: 12.99
    Architecture: Kepler
    Code name: GK107
    Type: Workstation
    Release date: March 1, 2013 (8 years ago)
    Starting price: $599
    Current price: $1172 (2x MSRP)
    Value for money: 0.23
    GPU Code Name: GK107
    Market segment: Workstation

    Specifications

    This is important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 graphics card. The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).

    Conveyors: 384
    Core Clock: 954 MHz
    Number of transistors: 1,270 million
    Process: 28nm
    Power consumption (TDP): 51 Watt
    Number of texels processed in 1 second: 30.53
    Floating point: 732.7 gflops
    Pipelines / CUDA cores: 384
    Number of transistors: 1,270 million
    Estimated heat output: 51 Watt

    Dimensions, connectors and compatibility

    There are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes today, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.

    Interface: PCIe 2.0 x16
    Length: 202 mm
    Additional power: None

    Memory (frequency and overclocking)

    Internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA Quadro K2000 + turbo overclocking option.

    Memory type: GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount: 2GB
    Memory bus width: 128 Bit
    Memory frequency: 4000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s

    Port and display support

    As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.

    Display connections: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

    API Support

    All NVIDIA Quadro K2000 supported APIs are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.

    DirectX: 12 (11_0)
    OpenGL: 4.6
    Vulkan: +

    Overall gaming performance

    All tests are based on FPS. Let’s see how NVIDIA Quadro K2000 ranked in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).

    Select games
    Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed ​​HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed ​​PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Death Stranding (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    F1 2020 (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Gears Tactics (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Doom Eternal (2020)

    low

    1280×720

    med.

    1920×1080

    high

    1920×1080

    ultra

    1920×1080

    QHD

    2560×1440

    4K

    3840×2160

    Description
    5 Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
    May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
    30 Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more
    40 Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
    60 Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more
    May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
    ? Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene.
    Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category.
    The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value.

    AMD equivalent

    AMD FirePro W4100

    Compare

    NVIDIA Quadro K2000 in benchmark results

    Benchmarks help determine performance in standard NVIDIA Quadro K2000 benchmarks. We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.

    Overall performance in benchmarks

    NVIDIA Quadro M520

    NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

    NVIDIA Quadro K2000

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

    AMD Radeon E8860

    Passmark is an excellent benchmark that is updated regularly and shows relevant graphics card performance information.

    NVIDIA Quadro M520

    NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

    NVIDIA Quadro K2000

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

    AMD Radeon E8860

    This test gives the best estimate of GPU performance. It provides highly accurate results.

    NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

    NVIDIA Quadro K2000

    NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

    3.