Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1080-vs-quadro-p2000%23gaming
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q vs Quadro P2000 Graphics cards Comparison
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q and Quadro P2000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q and Quadro P2000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
Check Price
Quadro P2000
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance.
Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q here:
GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q Laptops
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q | Quadro P2000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
|
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000.
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 — in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q and Quadro P2000 are build with Pascal architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q is 25 MHz higher, than Quadro P2000.
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q and Quadro P2000 are manufactured by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q is 2992 MHz higher, than Quadro P2000.
Game benchmarks
| Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 39% more, than Quadro P2000. |
||
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 39% more, than Quadro P2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q. |
||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro P2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro P2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro P2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than Quadro P2000. |
||
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Fortnite is 31% more, than Quadro P2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Quadro P2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro P2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro P2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 97% more, than Quadro P2000. |
||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than Quadro P2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 48% more, than Quadro P2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro P2000. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q | Quadro P2000 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | N17E-G3 Max-Q | GP106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2017 | 6 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1101 — 1290 MHz | 1076 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1278 — 1468 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 234. 9 |
94.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | 3,031 gflops |
| Length | 201 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | 140.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | — | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| VR Ready | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1. 2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.19 kh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
|
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile
- Quadro P2000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Quadro P2000 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q vs Tesla M60
- GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q vs FirePro W8100
- Quadro P2000 vs Tesla M60
- Quadro P2000 vs FirePro W8100
Page not found
Page not found
We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/video/geforce-gtx-1080-protiv-quadro-p2000%23gaming
Popular video card comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular video cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular
processor comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular processors
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 comparison which is better?
| General information | |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. |
|
| 38.2%
2.5% (7%) better than |
35.7% |
|
Architecture |
|
| Pascal | Pascal |
|
Codename |
|
| GP106 | GP104 |
|
Type |
|
| For workstations | Desktop |
|
Exit price |
|
| $585
-14 $ (-2.3%) better than |
$599 |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 1024 | 2560
1536 (150%) better than |
|
Core clock |
|
| 1076MHz | 1607 MHz
At 531 MHz (49.3%) better than |
|
Boost frequency |
|
| 1480 MHz | 1733 MHz
At 253 MHz (17. |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 4.400 million | 7.200 million |
|
Process |
|
| 16 nm | 16 nm |
|
Interface |
|
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power indicates the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 75 W
-105 W (-58.3%) better than |
180 W |
|
Length |
|
| 201 mm | 26.7 cm |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| no | 8-pin |
|
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
|
Multi Monitor |
|
| n/a | + |
|
SLI support |
|
| n/a | + |
|
3D Vision |
|
| n/a | + |
|
GPU Boost |
|
| n/a | 3.0 |
|
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies. |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
| + | + |
|
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
|
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously. |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Maximum temperature |
|
| n/a | 94 °C |
|
Recommended power supply |
|
| n/a | 500 Watt |
|
Multi-monitor support |
|
| no data | 1 |
|
Ansel |
|
|
Virtual Reality |
|
| n/a | + |
|
Decred / DCR (Decred) |
|
| n/a | 3. 09 Gh/s |
|
Siacoin / SC (Sia) |
|
| n/a | 2.28 Gh/s |
|
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) |
|
| n/a | 1 Sol/s |
|
Tire |
|
| n/a | PCIe 3.0 |
|
ShadowWorks |
|
| no data | + |
|
Thickness |
|
| n/a | 2 slots |
|
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
| n/a | 2560 |
|
Height |
|
| n/a | 11.1 cm |
|
Video Connectors |
|
| 4x DisplayPort | DP 1. 42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
|
DirectX |
|
| 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
|
Floating point performance |
|
| 3.031 gflops | 8.873 gflops |
|
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
| n/a | 27.63 Mh/s |
The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. 
1%) better than 
For example, for the development and design of neural networks. | Memory | |
|
Memory type |
|
| GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
|
Maximum memory A large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures, |
|
| 5 GB | 8 GB
3 GB (60%) better than |
|
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. | |
