AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: What is the difference?
46points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
48points
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 1600X better than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G?
- 1.5x faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.6GHzvs4 x 3.6GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12vs8 - 1MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs2MB - 12MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs4MB - 64GB larger maximum memory amount?
128GBvs64GB - 1.6MB/core more L3 cache per core?
2.6MB/corevs1MB/core - Has FMA4?
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2400G better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X?
- 533MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs2400MHz - 30W lower TDP?
65Wvs95W - 256KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs128KB - Has integrated graphics?
- Supports ECC memory?
- Has NX bit?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
Intel Core i5-7600K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
AMD A8-5600K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
AMD A8-5500
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel Core i5-7600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
Intel Core i5-7500
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
AMD A10-7850K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel Core i7-4790K
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
0 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
0. 0/10
0 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
2 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
8.5/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
10.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
No reviews yet
7.5/10
2 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
7.0/10
2 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
9.0/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
9.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.6GHz
4 x 3.6GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2. CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.9GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0. 5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2.6MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2400MHz
2933MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
43.71GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1. uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 5 1600X: performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2400G with 4-cores against the 3.6 GHz Ryzen 5 1600X with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G
51
Ryzen 5 1600X
52
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Ryzen 5 2400G
23
Ryzen 5 1600X
35
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Ryzen 5 2400G
45
Ryzen 5 1600X
41
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Ryzen 5 2400G
43
Ryzen 5 1600X
45
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 1600X and 2400G
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than the Ryzen 5 1600X – 65 vs 95 Watt
- Newer — released 10-months later
- Includes an integrated GPU Radeon RX Vega 11
- Around 3.
97 GB/s (10%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size
- Has 2 more physical cores
- 3% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+8%
1024
Ryzen 5 1600X
945
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
4840
Ryzen 5 1600X
+34%
6473
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
2174
Ryzen 5 1600X
+1%
2202
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
8757
Ryzen 5 1600X
+49%
13040
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
923
Ryzen 5 1600X
+8%
997
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
3597
Ryzen 5 1600X
+65%
5930
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 5 1600X
General
Vendor | AMD | AMD |
Released | February 12, 2018 | April 11, 2017 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Raven Ridge | Zen |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Integrated GPU | Radeon RX Vega 11 | No |
Performance
Cores | 4 | 6 |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Base Frequency | 3.![]() |
3.6 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 36x | 36x |
L1 Cache | 128K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 4MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Transistors | 4.9 billions | 4.8 billions |
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
TDP | 65 W | 95 W |
Max. temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | — |
GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | — |
GPU Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | — |
Shading Units | 704 | — |
TMUs | 44 | — |
ROPs | 8 | — |
Execution Units | 11 | — |
TGP | 65 W | — |
Max.![]() |
3840×2160 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Ryzen 5 2400G
1.746 TFLOPS
Ryzen 5 1600X
n/a
Memory support
Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
Official site | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G official page | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 24 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Ryzen 5 2400G
2 (40%)
Ryzen 5 1600X
3 (60%)
Total votes: 5
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G or Ryzen 5 2400G
2.
Apple M1 or AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X or Ryzen 5 2400G?
Name
Message
Promotion
Ryzen 5 3400G Review: CPU + Vega Graphics
As part of the big Zen 2 Ryzen processor launch, AMD released two Ryzen 3000 parts that include a graphics component. The new Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen 5 3400G APUs are straightforward upgrades compared to the models they replace, starting at $99 and $149 respectively.
AMD is using the Zen+ architecture, meaning these APUs are manufactured using the 12nm process, which offers improved clock speeds and thermals. The R5 3400G gets a cooler upgrade out of the box with the Wraith Spire, while the 3200G keeps the base Wraith Stealth. The 3400G also does away with the thermal paste interface material and it’s soldered just like the big boy chips.
The 3400G CPU cores have been overclocked by 8% from 3.9 GHz to 4.2 GHz, while the Vega 11 graphics engine comes clocked at 1.4 GHz, a 12% boost from the 2400G. The price sticker has also received a slight discount with the R5 3400G starting at $149, or $20 lower than the 2400G at launch.
Ryzen 3 2200G | Ryzen 5 2400G | Ryzen 3 3200G | Ryzen 5 3400G | |
Launch Price | $99 | $169 | $99 | $149 |
Cores/Threads | 4/4 | 4/8 | 4/4 | 4/8 |
Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Cache | 4MB | 4MB | 6MB | 6MB |
GPU | Vega 8 @ 1100 MHz | Vega 11 @ 1250 MHz | Vega 8 @ 1250 MHz | Vega 11 @ 1400 MHz |
TDP | 65W | 65W | 65W | 65W |
For testing this new APU we’re using the MSI B450 Carbon Gaming with 16GB of DDR4-3200 memory. We won’t be covering the APU from every angle like we did with the 2200G and 2400G as most of the information such as memory scaling is still relevant.
For now we want to see how different the 3400G is to the 2400G, and what kind of value proposition is on the table considering the Ryzen R5 3600 starts at just $200 and there’s also the previous-gen 1600 and 2600 parts which can be found for even less — sans graphics, of course.
Application Benchmarks
The Cinebench R20 multi-core test shows the 3400G providing an 9% performance uplift from the 2400G model, largely due to that 8% increase in clock speed, and partly due to the improved IPC of Zen+. It’s worth noting that the R5 3600 is 81% faster in this test while only costing 33% more, though it does lack integrated graphics. We’ll discuss more about that later.
We see a ~10% improvement in single core performance thanks to the frequency boost and upgrade to Zen+. This placed the 3400G on par with the R5 2600X and this time the R5 3600 was just 15% faster as it’s not able to put those extra cores to work in this test.
Memory bandwidth performance is much the same, Zen+ improves memory latency but as you can see in terms of bandwidth both sustained a transfer speed of 36 GB/s.
The 3400G was 10% faster than the 2400G in the 7-Zip compression test and while that’s a decent little bump in a world where 6-core processors are now commonplace it doesn’t look that impressive.
AMD’s SMT implementation is very efficient when it comes to decompression work in 7-zip. As a result the 3400G beats the Core i7-7700K and wasn’t a great deal slower than the 6-core/6-thread 9600K.
We’ve tested Premiere using two configurations: one with the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, the standard graphics card used for testing CPUs, and then one using the intergrtated Vega 11 graphics for GPU acceleration.
With a highly capable discrete graphics card the 3400G is actually very impressive in this test, completing the render in just 629 seconds. However, without a graphics card it took 1762 seconds and that’s not so great, if you were going to use this processor for video editing and encoding, buying an entry-level graphics card would be the way to go, or better yet just buy the R5 3600 and pair that with an entry-level graphics card.
The 3400G was only 4% faster than the 2400G in the Corona benchmark and while that made both much faster than the Core i5-7600K, they were slower than everything else.
Similar margins are seen in the Blender Open Data benchmark, this time the 3400G offered a 6% performance boost over the 2400G and both trailed the 7700K.
Power Consumption
When it comes to power consumption the 3400G still sips power, pushing total consumption 10% higher than that of the 2400G and that meant system usage was 10% lower than what we saw with the 7600K.
Moving on to operating temperatures we see that the 3400G peaked at 58 degrees using the Wraith Spire box cooler when running the Blender test. Out of the box it sustained an operating frequency of 3950 MHz and when enabling PBO + AutoOC in the Ryzen Master software that didn’t change.
When testing with F1 2019 the 3400G ran much cooler despite the Vega 11 graphics now being in use, here the CPU peaked at just 45 degrees and ran at 4025 MHz. Enabling PBO + AutoOC pushed the operating temperature up to 48 degrees and this time we did get a 100 MHz bump to the operating frequency.
Gaming Benchmarks (with add-in GeForce GPU)
Before testing the integrated GPU, let’s take a quick look at how the 3400G stacks up to other CPUs when comparing gaming performance without a GPU limitation.
At 1080p it’s faster than the Core i5-7600K and not a great deal slower than the 6-core/12-thread R5 1600, moreover it provided an 11% boost over the 2400G. The 3400G is even more competitive at 1440p, situating itself between the R5 1600 and 1600X, not bad for budget processor.
Performance in Battlefield V was respectable. For example, the 3400G mimicked the 1% low performance of the Core i7-7700K while the average was only slightly down on the R5 1600. This time the 3400G was up to 10% faster than the 2400G.
We found a similar result when testing with The Division 2, here the 3400G offers a 7% performance increase over the 2400G while trailing the R5 1600 by a 10% margin. The 3400G is still 8% faster than the 2400G at 1440p, but now it’s able to close in on the 1% low performance of the R5 1600 and 1600X.
We see a pretty impressive result in Far Cry. At first you might think the 17% performance uplift over the 2400G is a mistake, but we assure you it’s not. The improved cache and memory latency of the Zen+ architecture gives the 3400G a big advantage in Far Cry New Dawn, enough to match the R5 1600X.
The margin comes down a little at 1440p, but even so the 3400G was still 12% faster than the 2400G and once again matched the R5 1600X.
Gaming with the Integrated Vega 11 Graphics
Our first test shows a mere 5% improvement in performance over the 2400G. The good news is that the game was highly playable at 1080p, pushing well over 60 fps at all times.
Next up we have Rainbow Six Siege and here the 3400G was up to 8% faster though both APUs performed very well, rendering over 60 fps, even at 1080p. Of course, we’re using the lowest possible graphics quality preset, but for integrated graphics, that’s still impressive.
Fortnite also plays well at 1080p but unfortunately the 3400G offered no real performance gain over the older 2400G in this title.
We see something similar in Far Cry New Dawn, despite the CPU side of the 3400G being much more punchy in this title, the Vega 11 overclock doesn’t help here.
Next to no difference is seen in Strange Brigade, the 3400G provided a few extra frames but that was it.
Same goes for F1 2019. The 3400G is only good for a few extra frames, but the game was playable even at 1080p.
World of Tanks sees a 14% performance improvement when upgrading to the 3400G. This is a title that benefits from the Zen+ improvements but isn’t heavily GPU bound when using the integrated graphics, so it’s a rare situation where the improved CPU performance can be utilized in-game with the Vega 11 graphics.
Who Is It For?
When AMD released the first Zen-based APUs in February of last year it was an exciting time for these products to hit shelves. At the time graphics card pricing was heavily inflated due to mining demand, even if you were prepared to spend three or four times more than you should, shelves were empty to get you a new GPU.
The 2400G and 2200G gave gamers on a budget an alternative. The APUs would let you play games, albeit with low quality visuals, but they gave you the ability to play and then upgrade to a discrete graphics card later. Today though, we have no such issue. The second-hand graphics card market is thriving and you can buy a new Radeon RX 570 for as little as $130 and that will enable a vastly superior gaming experience. It’s like comparing chalk and cheese.
The Ryzen 5 3400G will set you back $149, meaning the APU option remains relatively cheap for those buying new hardware, but we feel in today’s market it will be relegated to be a niche product.
If your primary interest is gaming, a Ryzen 3 1200 for $65 new with an RX 570 for $130 or a second-hand model for $60, will be a significantly better gaming combo. Comparing to ‘new’ pricing, for just 30% more you’ll see over 200% more performance. But if you’re willing to shop used on the graphics card, the combo will be cheaper than just buying the 3400G.
For heavy productivity work, the 3400G isn’t a cost effective option either. Instead you’re better off with the Ryzen 5 1600 for $105 and pair it with a dirt-cheap discrete graphics card. You’ll be able to get something with the $45 leftover.
If all you want is a basic PC for office-type work, then the 3400G is suitable. Likewise, if you’re building a compact home theater PC and gaming isn’t the focus, the 3400G is a really nice option, too. Beyond that, you’re better off with other alternatives as we just mentioned. The previous-gen 2400G can also be had for $100 right now and considering the the 3400G was never 50% faster, we’d probably just get the 2400G and pocket the extra cash, save that for a better graphics card in the future if gaming is at all in your plans.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- AMD Ryzen 5 3400G on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X on Amazon, Google Express
- Intel Core i5-9400F on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600X on Amazon, Google Express
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon, Google Express
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Google Express
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review: The Best Blend of CPU and GPU Performance We’ve Ever Seen
This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.
For the past 11 months, AMD has steadily pushed its Ryzen family of CPUs into the market, beginning with the Ryzen 7 1800X. Up until now, all of AMD’s Ryzen CPUs have lacked the integrated graphics component that defined the company’s midrange consumer products from the 2011 launch of Llano through last year’s Bristol Ridge.
The new Raven Ridge parts launching today break with the old product families entirely, combining AMD’s latest Ryzen architecture with an integrated version of its latest Vega GPU. These new cores will replace the Ryzen 5 1400 and Ryzen 3 1200 going forward. Here’s how the new 2200G and 2400G compare with these processors:
There’s more variation between the two CPUs than we’d typically expect for two products in the same family based on the same architecture. The 2400G (See on Amazon) is clocked 1.12x higher than the 1400, with a latency-reducing 4×0 configuration that should help improve game performance. L3 cache is only half the size, however, and the number of PCI Express lanes attached to the PCIe slot has fallen from x16 to x8. This last is unlikely to have any serious impact on GPU performance; single-GPU configurations don’t tax the PCI Express subsystem very much.
AMD’s own testing found little difference between a 4×0 configuration, where all four cores in a single CCX are active, and a 2×2 configuration, where two cores in two CCXs are active. The 2×2 option offers a larger L3, while the 4×0 has lower latency. Opting for a 4×0 configuration allowed AMD to reduce Raven Ridge’s die size, and the higher CPU clocks are intended to compensate for the smaller L3 cache. The new Ryzen APUs have a die ~210mm sq, compared with 213mm sq for an eight-core Ryzen 7 CPU.
AMD also notes it has transitioned to a revised CPU package and a traditional nonmetallic TIM for the 2400G and 2200G. The company also credits its new CPU packaging for allowing it to officially support DDR4-2933, “the highest official memory clock of any consumer processor.” That’s an important facet of the conversation, given AMD’s GPUs have historically been quite dependent on RAM clocks to hit peak performance. Raven Ridge also implements a tweaked version of Precision Boost, (Precision Boost 2, natch), which the company believes will allow the CPU to hit and sustain its boost clocks more often. The new APU’s CPU + GPU topology is shown below:
The bus topology suggests AMD’s Ryzen-derived APUs will continue to benefit from higher-clocked memory. AMD’s Infinity Fabric’s bandwidth is pegged to RAM clock; the controller runs at 1/2 DRAM clock speed. Higher RAM bandwidth = higher Infinity Fabric performance.
Improvements to Precision Boost
Ryzen’s original Precision Boost algorithm tracked workloads across cores, but picked its maximum frequency based on the total number of active CPUs, as opposed to the characteristics of the workload. In some cases, 3-4 cores (6-8 threads) were active, even though the total amount of work was small and there was no reason to use the lower “all core” boost settings in lieu of the higher-clocked boost available when 1-2 cores were active.
Precision Boost 2 gives the CPU more headroom to hold a higher clock when more cores are loaded. In the event the CPU does hit one of its predefined limits and needs to throttle down, this process now happens more gradually.
These changes are meant to allow the Ryzen 5 2400G and 2200G to hit higher performance targets without relying solely on higher clock speeds.
AMD’s Integrated Vega GPU
The 2400G and 2200G are both based on AMD’s Vega GPU. The Radeon 5 2400G has a top GPU clock of 1250MHz and a 704:44:16 configuration, while the 2200G clocks up to 1100MHz and uses a 512:32:16 configuration. While we don’t have a Carrizo for a direct comparison, the highest-end GPU configuration AMD has previously shipped would be A12-9800, which used a 512:32:8 configuration and topped out at 1.1GHz.
Vega 11 is a substantial upgrade, offering higher clocks, more cores, additional texture mapping units, and 2x the ROPs. All told, the performance improvements should be substantial.
Sizing Up The Competition
If you’ve followed Ryzen’s debut over the past 12 months, you’ve probably got a pretty good idea how this is likely to go. Intel’s decision to push six-core chips all the way down below $200 means AMD’s 4C/8T 2400G ($169) will be head-to-head against the 6C/6T Core i5-8400 ($189). The four extra threads from SMT will help, but Intel’s CPUs also typically enjoy a modest IPC advantage over their AMD counterparts.
At first glance, this seems like merely a continuation of the status quo over the past eight years. Ever since Llano, AMD has marketed and sold APUs as superior GPU solutions compared with Intel’s integrated products. But Ryzen isn’t Bulldozer. Back then, buying an AMD APU meant accepting CPU performance that only averaged a bit more than half of what Intel could offer. Today, AMD is on much stronger ground.
While we don’t have any other Core i5s on hand to include here, the Core i5-8400 is the only real competitor. 7th generation Core i5’s, like the Core i5-7400, top out at 3.5GHz and offer just four cores. The combination of SMT and a higher all-core Turbo clock would give the 2400G an edge against that CPU.
Love Gaming In The Time Of Cholera Cryptocurrency
The GPU market is badly overheated at the moment, with even entry-level GPUs sometimes selling for 1.5x – 2x over MSRP. With prices that high, there’s a potential case to be made for the 2200G and 2400G as the most affordable graphics solutions currently on the market. At 704:44:16, the Vega 11 inside the Radeon 2400G isn’t far off the Radeon RX 460 (896:56:16). Granted, there’s a significant memory bandwidth gap — 51. 2GB/s of shared bandwidth for the 2400G, versus 112GB/s of dedicated bandwidth for the RX 460 — but moving to DDR4 for its APUs gives AMD a much-needed bandwidth boost.
We’ll be watching the Ryzen 5 2400G to see how it performs overall, and whether it’s up to serving as a “good enough” gaming solution until the market cools off.
Test Configuration
Both our AMD and Intel testbeds used 16GB of Geil DDR4-3200 and a fully patched and updated version of Windows 10 Fall Creators Update. The Core i5-8400 testbed used an Asus Prime Z370-A motherboard, while the AMD system uses a B350I Pro AC. For those worried about GPU capabilities on previous boards, AMD reports nearly all Ryzen board shipped to date are outfitted with at least one on-board GPU output. It’s always smart to check the capabilities of the platform you’re looking to buy, but the 2400G should be drop-in compatible with all the motherboards on the market, once UEFI updates are available. We’ll cover general CPU benchmarks first, before moving on to the game side of things.
Game Configurations:
Our game benchmarks are between the Core i5-8400 and the Ryzen 5 2400G, but there are a few points to touch on before we hit the numbers. First, several of the games we typically test using DirectX 12 — Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation, Hitman, and Rise of the Tomb Raider — have all been tested using DirectX 11 in this review. While AMD’s GPU architectures have tended to favor DX12, this does not appear to be the case for Vega 11, at least not right now. This wasn’t unique to AMD; Intel’s integrated performance slightly favored DX11 as well.
Our preferred resolution for these results was 1080p, but only if the game was capable of running on Vega 11 at a 30fps minimum threshold. When Vega 11 could not hold 30fps @ 1080p on the game’s lowest detail settings, we dropped to 720p and tested again. In some cases, we’ve included results at 1080p and 720p (Medium Detail) to illustrate some of the tradeoffs Vega 11 owners could make depending on whether they wish to emphasize higher resolutions or higher frame rates.
We also tested the Intel Core i5-8400 at a significantly lower resolution in Shadow of Mordor, for reasons that will become apparent.
AMD’s Vega 11 Delivers a Brutal Gaming Beatdown
Watching the Core i5-8400’s UHD 630 try to take on Vega 11 was like watching a time-traveling Uwe Boll trying to box Muhammed Ali in his prime. It’s less a fight and more an examination of whether it’s possible to hit someone so hard, so fast, they actually fuse hydrogen.
AMD’s Vega 11 plays games. Intel’s Core i5-8400 plays slideshows.
Is it good enough to serve as a holdover until GPU prices come down? That’s always going to depend, at least somewhat, on what you can afford to buy in the first place — but if cash is tight, the 2400G gives you some gaming performance now, while you wait. The UHD 630 can’t even meet this modest level of performance. The x8 PCIe link isn’t going to hit the performance of any midrange card. It may not even ding a higher-end model, at least not materially.
On the CPU side of things, Intel’s Core i5-8400 is more than a match for the Ryzen 5 2400G. Margins vary depending on the test, but if you’re only trying to maximize your CPU performance, the 2400G isn’t the best option on the market. The Ryzen 5 1600, at $189, would be a much stronger competitor for the Core i5-8400.
AMD’s pre-Ryzen APU family asked customers to accept a CPU core barely more than 50 percent the speed of an equivalent Intel CPU in exchange for modestly faster integrated graphics. The Ryzen 5 2400G asks for far less CPU performance and offers graphics performance in an entirely different league. With the GPU market so badly overheated, the Ryzen 5 2400G may even be the most cost-effective solution you can buy today, especially since there’s nothing stopping anyone from pairing it with a higher-end GPU down the line.
In aggregate, it’s the finest APU AMD has ever built, and a great kick-off for 2018.
Now Read: DDR4 Scaling and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: Do Higher Clocks Boost Performance?
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G vs.
Intel and Nvidia
Last year was an amazing one for AMD, with the company releasing a slew of extremely successful new CPUs based on the Zen architecture. This year is getting off to a decent start as well—with a new line of Ryzen CPUs with integrated Vega graphics processors (the R3 2200G and R5 2400G) being launched earlier this week. In this article, we will look at how well these freshly released processors fare against Intel’s integrated graphics, Nvidia’s low-budget GT 1030, and AMD’s own earlier APU integrated graphics.
Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G specifications. Source: Techspot.
R3 2200G and R5 2400G vs. Intel iGPU, Nvidia GT 1030
First of all, the main comparison—does AMD hold the integrated GPU crown? Recently, AMD has started moving away from their APU brand, which is in its essence was a CPU with an integrated GPU. These new Ryzen+Vega solutions are not being marketed as APUs—but instead just as AMD Ryzen CPUs with Vega graphics.
According to Steven Walton’s benchmarks from Techspot/HardwareUnboxed, the UHD integrated graphics solutions from Intel are still a fair margin behind the integrated graphics solutions of AMD. In fact, the new R5 2400G (which features Radeon Vega 11 graphics) gets frame rates that are comparable to the performance delivered by an Intel Pentium G4560 with a separate Nvidia GT 1030 installed:
In Fortnite, at 1280×720 resolution with medium quality settings, the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G is able to hold at least 70 FPS over 99% of the time. That is comparable to the Intel+Nvidia combo and over 3 times as fast as Intel’s iGPU performance. Source: Techspot.
One of the most successful games of 2017, PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds, performs relatively poorly on AMD’s Ryzen+Vega solutions. At 1280×720 resolution with lowest quality settings, the Intel+Nvidia combo is the only solution out of these that is able to hold an average of over 60 FPS. The Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G are still at least 2 times as fast as what Intel’s iGPU offers—with poor, but relatively playable performance. On an Intel iGPU, the game is likely to be unplayable. Source: Techspot.
In Overwatch, at 1280×720 resolution with medium quality settings, the Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G offer great performance, holding over 80 FPS more than 99% of the time, comparable to that of the Intel+Nvidia combo. In comparison, Intel’s iGPU solutions offer arguably unplayable performance. Source: Techspot.
In terms of performance, the Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G offer mostly playable performance on the more popular titles, at least at 1280×720 and lower quality settings. One really impressive performance stat here is how the R3 2200G (costing just around $100) single-handedly tackles Overwatch, likely due to the fact that Overwatch is a well-optimized game—which makes the R3 2200G a realistic choice for budget builders whose primary or only demanding game is Overwatch (for those interested in higher quality settings and/or higher resolutions, check out our big guide article on building a PC for Overwatch).
Integrated graphics have never been especially successful in running more advanced and visually complex games at respectable frame rates, even at the lowest possible settings and resolutions. With the Ryzen G-series, AMD aims to change that; and so far, it seems that they are coming up with relatively viable solutions.
In GTA V, at 1280×720 resolution with low quality settings, the Ryzen G-series CPUs achieved totally playable performance, even leaving headroom for increasing the settings. Source: Tom’s Hardware.
In The Witcher 3, the result is again impressive. At 720p resolution with low quality settings, the R5 2400G and R3 2200G hover around 40 and 50 average FPS, respectively, leaving room for increasing the settings and/or resolution in case of locked 30 FPS gameplay. Source: Tom’s Hardware.
If you are interested in a more recent (and highly demanding) title, then the Ryzen 5 2400G with an overclocked CPU and iGPU is able to hold 30-40 FPS at 1920×1080 with low-medium settings in Assassin’s Creed: Origins.
Conclusion
These Ryzen+Vega processors have been long in the making, and they’re finally here, offering a lot of potential performance for not a lot of money. The R5 2400G ($170) offers basically the same performance as a dual-core hyper-threaded Intel Pentium G4560 and Nvidia GT 1030 combo ($70+$90). To AMD’s benefit, the R5 2400G is a 4-core/8-thread part, offering much more in terms of both CPU-intensive tasks and “future-proofing”.
Another benefit of a unified CPU and GPU design comes into play with small form-factor PCs, including both Micro ATX and Mini ITX builds. If you want an Home Theater PC for your living room TV that could do many things, from playing lower-profile games to streaming from your main rig, the single-chip design is much more desirable as it will make the box much smaller, especially when using a pico-PSU.
A tiny 150 W pico-PSU designed for Mini ITX form factor PCs.
The G4560+GT 1030 combo is a more typical solution, however, and may be more preferable to those who only want a cheap gaming rig, and are uninterested in possible future overclocking or smaller form factors. An Intel Pentium processor with a GT 1030 will also do fine with cheaper memory, whereas AMD’s Zen architecture still heavily depends on higher RAM speeds. 2933 MHz RAM seems optimal for highest performance on the new R5 2400G and even the R3 2200G, but that is usually only available in higher memory quantities and so costs much more than a cheap DDR4 stick. This is especially noticeable with the recent RAM price hikes.
However, it seems more viable to get a decent CPU with an iGPU and then add in a new graphics card down the line—than it is to get a very cheap CPU with a cheap GPU, the latter having to be sold or recycled when it is upgrade time, and the older/lower-tier CPU likely bottlenecking any new GPU. Each set-up has its pros and cons, but for budget builders the CPU+iGPU choice (particularly with one of these new AMD G-series chips) currently edges out today’s ultra-low-power graphics cards, in terms of value and upgrade potential.
Sources:
- TechEpiphany YouTube channel
- Techspot
- Tom’s Hardware
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen | Zen | ||||||
Core name | Summit Ridge | Raven Ridge | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 5 1000 | Ryzen 5 2000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | YD160XBCAEWOF, YD160XBCM6IAE |
YD2400C5M4MFB, YD2400C5FBBOX |
||||||
Release date | Q1 2017 | Q1 2018 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 4.![]() |
4.950.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,0 GHz | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 16 MB | 16 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR4-2933 | ||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 39,74 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 24 | 12 | ||||||
TDP | 95 W | 65 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | ||||||
GPU cores | — | 11 | ||||||
GPU shading units | — | 704 | ||||||
GPU base clock | — | 300 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | — | 1250 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | — | 1.![]() |
||||||
Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 95°C | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 403 | 423 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 3.179 | 2.272 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 162 | 154 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.232 | 820 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.![]() |
1.006 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 7.081 | 4.827 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.176 | 2.153 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 13.005 | 8.735 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.345 | 3.958 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
20.509 | 11.738 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
253,9 GFLOPS | 165,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
216 pts / W | 181 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
403 3.179 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
423 2.272 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 40%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
162 1. ![]() |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
154 820 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 50%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
1.029 7. ![]() |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
1.006 4.827 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
2. ![]() 13.005 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
2.153 8.735 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 49%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
4.345 20. ![]() |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
3.958 11.738 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 75%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
4.249 19.092 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4.160 12.101 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 58%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
4.540 21.479 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4. ![]() 14.684 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 46%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 2400G Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 5 1600X:
performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Which is better: 4-core AMD Ryzen 5 2400G at 3. 6 GHz or Ryzen 5 1600X with 6 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Ryzen 5 2400G
51
Ryzen 5 1600x
52
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei
9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
RYZEN 5 2400G
23
Ryzen 5 1600x
35
Energy efficiency
Energy consumption chip
Ryzen 5 2400G
45
Ryzen 5 1600x
9000 41
Rating Nanoreview rating Nanoreviev
Ryzen 5 2400G
43
Ryzen 5 1600X
45
Key differences
What are the main differences between 1600X and 2400G
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- 32% lower than Ryzen 5 1600X peak power consumption — 65 vs 95 Watts
- 10 months later than rival
- Has an integrated graphics accelerator Radeon RX0 03 12 GB/s (10%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Has 12MB more L3 cache
- Has 2 physical cores more than
- 3% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4 GHz vs 3.
9 GHz)
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+8%
1024
Ryzen 5 1600X
945
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
0X 60 2 Ryzen 1
+34%
6473
Passmark CPU (single core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
2174
Ryzen 5 1600X
+1%
2202
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
8757
Ryzen 5 1600X
+49%
13040
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
923
Ryzen 5 1600X
+8%
997
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
3597
Ryzen 5 1600X
+65%
5930
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 5 1600X full technical specifications list
General information
Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Release date | February 12, 2018 | April 11, 2017 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Raven Ridge | Zen |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Integrated graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | No |
Performance
Cores | 4 | 6 |
Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
Frequency | 3.![]() |
3.6 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 36x | 36x |
Level 1 cache | 128KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 512KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 4MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
Number of transistors | 4.9 billion | 4.8 billion |
Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 95 W |
Critical temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
Integrated graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | — |
GPU frequency | 300 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1250 MHz | — |
Shader blocks | 704 | — |
TMUs | 44 | — |
ROPs | 8 | — |
Computer units | 11 | — |
TGP | 65 W | — |
Max.![]() |
3840×2160 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Ryzen 5 2400G
1.746 Teraflopse
Ryzen 5 1600x
N/D
Memory Support
Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
ECC support | Yes | Yes |
Other
Official website | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G website | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 12 | 24 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Ryzen 5 2400G
2 (40%)
Ryzen 5 1600X
3 (60%)
Total votes: 5
Competitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 5 2400G
2.
Apple M1 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X or Ryzen 5 2400G?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 5 1600: 9 performance comparison0001
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Which is better: 4-core AMD Ryzen 5 2400G at 3.6 GHz or Ryzen 5 1600 with 6 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Ryzen 5 2400G
51
Ryzen 5 1600
49
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei
Ryzen 5 24000 9000 23
Ryzen 5 1600
32
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption chip
Ryzen 5 2400g
45
Ryzen 5 1600
44
REARVIEW
Final rating
Key differences
What are the main differences between 1600 and 2400G
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Launched 10 months later than rival
- Integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics accelerator
- 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (3.
9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz)
- 3.97 GB/s (10%) higher maximum bandwidth memory
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Has 12MB more L3 cache
- Has 2 physical cores more
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+14%
1024
Ryzen 5 1600
902
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
0 60 2 4840
+30%
6269
Passmark CPU (single core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+4%
2174
Ryzen 5 1600
2090
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
8757
Ryzen 5 1600
+42%
12399
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
923
Ryzen 5 1600
+2%
939
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
3597
Ryzen 5 1600
+42%
5111
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 5 1600 full technical specifications list
General information
Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Release date | February 12, 2018 | April 11, 2017 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Raven Ridge | Zen |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Integrated graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | No |
Performance
Cores | 4 | 6 |
Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
Frequency | 3.![]() |
3.2 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 36x | 32x |
Level 1 cache | 128KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 512KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 4MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
Number of transistors | 4.9 billion | 4.8 billion |
Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
Critical temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
Integrated graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | — |
GPU frequency | 300 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1250 MHz | — |
Shader blocks | 704 | — |
TMUs | 44 | — |
ROPs | 8 | — |
Computer units | 11 | — |
TGP | 65 W | — |
Max.![]() |
3840×2160 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Ryzen 5 2400G
1.746 Teraflops
Ryzen 5 1600
N/D
Memory Support
Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | |
Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB | |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 | |
Max. bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s | |
ECC support | Yes | Yes |
Other
Official site | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G website | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 website |
PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 12 | 20 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Ryzen 5 2400G
8 (47. 1%)
Ryzen 5 1600
9 (52.9%)
Total votes: 17
Competitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 5 5600G
2.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600
3.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 5600X
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 2600
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 5 2400G?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: What is the difference?
12 vs 8
3MB vs 2MB
16MB vs 4MB
128GB vs 64GB
2.6MB/core vs 1MB/core
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2400G better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X?
- 533MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 2400MHz - 30W below TDP?
65W vs 95W - 256KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 128KB - Does it have integrated graphics?
- Supports memory troubleshooting code?
- Has NX bit?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD RYZEN 5 2400G
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
VS
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
9000.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 AMD AMD AMD AMD Ryzen 5 5 1600x
VS
Intel Core i5-7600K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
VS
AMD A8-5600K
AMD RYSE 5G0002 VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
VS
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD
AMD RYZENE
AMD A8-5500
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
VS
AMD Phenom II X4
AMD Ryzen 5 2400000 VS 9000 VS 9000 AMD AMD AMD Pro 2400GE
AMD RYZEN 5 1600X
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD RYZEN 5 2400G
VS
Intel Core i5-7600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
9000 VS
Intel Core INTEL Core INTL Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
VS
AMD A10-7850K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
Intel Core I7-4790K
0023 Reviews of users
General rating
AMD RYZEN 5 1600X
0 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
0. 0 /10
0 Reviews Ryzen 5 2400G
8.5 /10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Games
Reviews yet not
7.5 /10
2 Votes
performance
9000 9000
2 2 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
9.0 /10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
No reviews yet
0003
9.0 /10
2 VOTES
performance
1. Squamous of the central processor
6 x 3.6GHZ
4 x 3.6GHZ
The central processor speed shows how many processing cycles per second can perform the processor, taking into account all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2.6MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2400MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
43.71GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5. Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
This test measures CPU performance using multithreading.
2nd PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through digital rights management (DRM) technology .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Specifications and Reviews / Overclockers.
ua
- News
- Specifications
- Reviews
- Processors
- Motherboards
- Memory
- Video cards
- Cooling systems
- Enclosures
- Power supplies
- Accumulators
- Peripherals
- Systems
- Notebooks
- Games
- Analytics 90T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3.
73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2.
26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2.
8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760Kathlon X4 750Kathlon X4 740athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8-5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3650A6-3600A6-3500A4-3400A4-3300PHEL0T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3.
73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2.
26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2.
8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370)Celeron 333 (Slot 1)Celeron 300A (S370)Celeron 300A (Slot 1)Celeron 300Celeron 266
Up to 10 processors can be selected simultaneously
by holding CtrlAMD Ryzen 5 2400G processor reviews:
- Examining the Overclocking Potential of Five Ryzen 5 2400Gs
- AMD APU Raven Ridge. Studying the overclocking potential and performance of Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G
- U.A. | EN
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: What is the difference?
56points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
48points
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparison Winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 1600 better than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G?
- 33.
33% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.2GHz vs 4 x 3.6GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - 1MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 2MB - 32.22% higher PassMark score?
12398 vs 9377 - 12MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 4MB - 192KB more L1 cache?
576KB vs 384KB - 7.86% higher PassMark score (single)?
2086 vs 1934 - 1.67MB/core more L3 cache per core?
2.67MB/core vs 1MB/core
- 266MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 2667MHz - 0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.9GHz vs 3.6GHz - Does it have integrated graphics?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
9000 VS
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500u
9000 AMD Ryzen 5 2400000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS AMD 2400GE
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 9000 9000
VS
AMD Ryzen 5000 AMD 5600g 9000 AMD 5600g 9000 AMD0002 AMD RYZEN 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 3200g
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 AMD 1600
VS
Intel Core i5-9400f
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
VS
Intel Core I3-10100000 AMD Ry0003
VS
Intel Core i5-7600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 2200g
AMD Ryzen 5 16
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
VS
Intel Core i7-4790k
Comparison0003
AMD RYZEN 5 1600
10.
0 /10
1 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
2 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
8.5 /10
2 Reviews of users 9000
The price ratio
7.0 /10
1 Votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
10.0 /10
1 votes
7.5 /10
2 Votes
performance
10.0.0 /10
1 Votes
7.0 /10
2 Votes
9000.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 /
1 Votes
9.0 /10
2 Votes
Energy efficiency
10.0 /10
1 Votes
9.0 /10
2 Votes
EXPROMEN0024
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.2GHz
4 x 3.6GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multi-tasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.6GHz
3.9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2.67MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2667MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
42.7GB/s
43.71GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
310.8seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
948.6seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.
Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM) technology .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
The first generation of fermented baked milk made a lot of noise. And the second did not turn to kefir, I should note. IMHO comparison 9The 2469 AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X were obvious. These processors have a lot in common, but there is a difference and it is tricky and lies in the details. Which we will now quickly analyze.
AMD Ryzen 1600X processor provided by Kiev-IT store. AMD Ryzen 2600X processor provided by MSI. I also express my gratitude to the MotoStuff store for providing the Zhiyun Smooth 4 stabilizer for shooting.
1. Package
2. Positioning
3. Specifications
4. Testing
5. Ryzen 5 1600X/2600X Results
6.
Prices in stores6.1. AMD Ryzen 5 1600X (Ukraine)
6.2. AMD Ryzen 5 1600X (Russia)
6.3. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (Ukraine)
6.4. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (Russia)
Package contents
I’ll start right away with the differences. The most important thing for me personally is not even the price, but the equipment. The first generation of AMD Ryzen X sometimes had a rather modest set. Ryzen 1600X, Ryzen 1700X and Ryzen 1800X came without a cooler at all.
The calculation was that these multi-core monsters would be bought separately for cooling, after all, the stock rustlers do not look very good against the background of increased frequencies.
It was a mistake. By the second generation of Ryzen, AMD sobered up, drank activated charcoal with pickle and added coolers to the processors.
And what more! In the case of the Ryzen 5 2600X, we get Wraith Spire, for the Ryzen 7 2700 we get Wraith Spire RGB, and for the 2700X we get Wraith Prism. If anything, they are all produced by Cooler Master.
It’s funny that the Ryzen 5 2600X comes with the same cooler that came with the Ryzen 5 1600 (no X, yes). That does not change the very fact of its existence. It is not necessary, as in the case of the 1600X, to buy additional air separately, neither for the first time, if the money is running out, nor for the second. The Wraith Spire is quite capable of pulling out the stock frequencies and boost, and even a slight overclocking will pull it out, while remaining not very loud.
Positioning
Next — prices. The positioning of the processors is similar, but the pricing policy is much more interesting. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is available on Rozetka for 7260 UAH/$268, and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is available for 4416 UAH/$163. The difference is, sorry, 100 ever-crunchy.
In other stores, the gap will be smaller, for 2600X you will need to pay from 6000 hryvnia / $ 221, and for 1600X — from 4100 hryvnia / $ 151 (just in the same Kiev-IT).
Specifications
Relevance tax, last year’s discount, everything affected, but the result is the same. It is important now to find out the difference in characteristics. To do this, I call on a comparison plate from the wilds of Euclidean geometry!
Designation AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Ryzen 5 2600X Package µOPGA-1331 µOPGA-1331 Part number YD160XBCAEWOF+/YD160XBCM6IAE+ YD260XBCM6IAF Process 14 nm 12 nm Socket Socket AM4 Socket AM4 Core name Summit Ridge Pinnacle Ridge Stepping B1 B2 Chip size 213 mm² 213 mm² Announcement March 16, 2017 April 13, 2018 Launch April 11, 2017 April 19, 2018 Launch price $249 $229 Series Ryzen Ryzen 2gen Manufacturer GlobalFoundries GlobalFoundries Technology CMOS CMOS Architecture Zen Zen+ Number of transistors 4,800,000,000 4,800,000,000 Number of cores 6 6 Number of threads 12 12 Base frequency 3600 MHz 3600 MHz Multiplier 36 36 Turbo frequency 4 GHz 2 cores, 3. 7 GHz 4 cores
4.2 GHz all cores L1 cache 576KB 576KB L1D cache 192KB 192KB L1I cache 384KB 384KB L2 cache 3.072KB 3.072KB L3 cache 16.384KB 16.384KB Memory support DDR4-2666 DDR4-2933 Maximum RAM 64GB 64GB Number of RAM channels 2 2 Maximum PCIe lanes 24 (4 per chipset) 24 (4 per chipset) PCIe configuration 1×16 + 1×4 2×8 + 1×4
1×16 + 1×4 2×8 + 1×4
PCIe version 3.0 3.0 AVX support Yes, 1/2 Yes, 1/2 Support for AMD-V Yes Yes AMD-VI support Yes Yes Additional overclocking technologies XFR, SenseMI XFR 2, Precision Boost 2, SenseMI ECC support Yes Yes Additional features Advanced Vector Extensions, Advanced Vector Extensions 2, Advanced Encryption Standard Instruction Set Extension Advanced Vector Extensions, Advanced Vector Extensions 2, Advanced Encryption Standard Instruction Set Extension Support for AES instructions Yes Yes TDP 95W 95 W Differences are highlighted in fat.
There aren’t many of them, but they do exist. The main thing is the price. I didn’t think that the R6 1600X was more expensive than the 2600X at launch, given the current state of affairs. Of course, the Ryzen 5 1600 bestseller with its $219 at the start of sales is a little far away, but still. Stepping — of course, the R5 2600X is an updated R5 1600X. R5 3600X should be new generation and stepping will be reset.
In terms of frequencies, the base frequencies are the same for both processors, but the boost for the 2600X is seriously pumped. 4.2 GHz for all cores is not for you to compete with the G4560, not to test the Athlon 200GE in PUBG and not to drive the corn ficus up to 5 GHz. However, this is provided by support for XFR 2, Precision Boost 2. The R5 1600X does not have the latter at all, and only the first version has the first.
The frequencies obviously increased due to AMD’s transition to the 12nm process technology. True, it is quite cunning, and information slipped through the network that there are still the same 14 nm, it’s just that GlobalFoundries marks it through a known place.
However, the increase in frequencies while maintaining the TDP 95W hints that there is still progress.
In terms of memory compatibility, Ryzen 2gen is much better in principle, although stability has increased in the first generation after a bunch of BIOS updates. Nevertheless, +333 MHz at the maximum official DDR4 frequency is a nice little thing.
Testing
Test bench looks like this
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600X (manual overclock to 3850 MHz)
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (manual overclock to 4100 MHz)
- Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
- Cooler MSI FROZR L
- GeIL EVO X ROG Certified RAM (3133 MHz)
- MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X 6GB Video Card
- SSD XPG GAMMIX S5 512GB
- Transcend MTE110S 512 GB SSD
- Case MSI MAG Pylon
In short, AMD Ryzen 5 2600X compared to Ryzen 5 1600X turned out to be:
- 8% faster in Cinebench R15 Single-Core
- 9% faster in Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
- is 5.
8% faster in GeekBench 3
- is 5.2% faster in VRAY
- 7% faster in World of Tanks enCore
- 8% faster in CS:GO
- is 8% faster in GTA V
- is 2% faster in Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
For a more or less equal fight, I did not increase the voltages, and took the most stable frequency indicators. And if with the Ryzen 5 1600X I recommend to play with overclocking right away and try to take the maximum, then I don’t recommend driving the 2600X in general. And all because of XFR 2 and Precision Boost 2.
AMD has done a very good job on auto overclocking, so most of the time 4.2 GHz all cores and for a short period of time will be better than 4.1 GHz all cores all the time. In the mode without manual overclocking, it will not be difficult to see a 2600X lead of up to 15% or more, especially on a turret like the MSI Core Frozr L. This is most pleasant in single-thread, because it brings the second generation of Ryzen very close to the fierce overprice from Intel .
.. Core i7-8700K, if anything, $450. For the same 6/12, and without stock cooling.
As for the temperatures, the processors have parity here… if the R5 2600X didn’t have a stock cooler. The latter is able to cool the pebble so well that in games you can count on the inclusion of auto-acceleration. Looking at our test bench, the temperatures of both stones are approximately the same, 71 degrees Celsius in the AIDA64 stress test. But then another bad case got caught, the details are in the review here.
Ryzen 5 1600X/2600X Summary
The last thing I love in the world is a confrontation that ends on an equal note. Yes, the Ryzen 5 2600X is noticeably faster and more stable, with or without manual overclocking. Yes, the Ryzen 5 2600X has a nice stock cooler that costs $40 on Amazon. Yes, better memory. But the prices… Lord, the gap of $100 won’t even be covered by a cooler.
My position is this. If you are building a new PC all at once, take the 2600X, X470 Gaming Plus and don’t blow your mustache, then you can also install the third generation Ryzen.