R9 255 vs gt 630: GeForce GT 630 vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

GeForce GT 630 vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 630
Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 255 OEM
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Mantle
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends Radeon R9 255 OEM

Based on theoretical specifications.

Core Configuration
GeForce GT 630 Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU Name GF108 (GF108-400-A1) vs Cape Verde (Cape Verde PRX)
Fab Process 40 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 116 mm² vs 123 mm²
Transistors 585 million vs 1,500 million
Shaders 96 vs 512
Compute Units 2 vs 8
Core clock 810 MHz vs 900 MHz
ROPs 4 vs 16
TMUs 16 vs 32

Memory Configuration
GeForce GT 630 Radeon R9 255 OEM
Memory Type DDR3 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 128 bit
Memory Speed 900 MHz


1800 MHz effective
vs 1150 MHz


4600 MHz effective
Memory Size 1024 Mb vs 2048 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GT 630 Radeon R9 255 OEM
TDP 65 watts vs 65 watts
Release Date 15 May 2012 vs 21 Dec 2013
  • GeForce GT 630

    3. 24 GP/s

  • Radeon R9 255 OEM

    14.40 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GT 630

    13.00 GT/s

  • Radeon R9 255 OEM

    28.80 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GT 630

    28.80 GB/s

  • Radeon R9 255 OEM

    73.60 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GT 630

    311.00 GFLOPs

  • Radeon R9 255 OEM

    921.60 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

VS
GeForce GT 630 GeForce GT 720
VS
GeForce GT 630 Radeon HD 8470D IGP
VS
Radeon R9 255 OEM GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
VS
Radeon R9 255 OEM Radeon R7 250X
VS
Radeon R7 360E GeForce GTX 750 v2
VS
GeForce GTX 750 v2 Radeon R7 360

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM








Nvidia GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GT 630 on one side and AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 96 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0,8 GHz, its lithography is 40 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 512 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0,9 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GT 630

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q2 2012

Q4 2013
Model number

GF108-400-A1

Cape Verde PRX
GPU name

GF108

Cape Verde
Architecture

Fermi

GCN 1. 0
Generation

GeForce 600

Volcanic Islands R9 200
Lithography

40 nm

28 nm
Transistors

585.000.000

1.500.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

810 MHz

900 MHz
GPU boost clock

810 MHz

930 MHz
Memory frequency

900 MHz

1.150 MHz
Effective memory speed

1,8 GB/s

4,6 GB/s
Memory size

1 GB

2 GB
Memory type

DDR3

GDDR5
Memory bus

128 Bit

128 Bit
Memory bandwidth

28,8 GB/s

73,6 GB/s
TDP

65 W

65 W
Suggested PSU 250W ATX Power Supply 250W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology


Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA

1x DVI
1x HDMI
2x mini-DisplayPort


Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

2

8
Shading units (cuda cores)

96

512
TMUs

16

32
ROPs

4

16
Cache memory

256 KB

256 KB
Pixel fillrate

3,2 GP/s

14,9 GP/s
Texture fillrate

13,0 GT/s

29,8 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

311 GFLOPS

952,3 GFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

25,9 GFLOPS

59,5 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

952,3
Nvidia GeForce GT 630

311

The difference is 206%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GT 630MNvidia GeForce GT 635Nvidia GeForce GT 635M

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GT 630 AMD equivalentAMD Radeon R9 255 OEM Nvidia equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.