R9 270x crossfire vs rx 580: Access denied | www.game-debate.com used Cloudflare to restrict access

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs MSI Radeon RX 580: What is the difference?

46points

AMD Radeon R9 270X

53points

MSI Radeon RX 580

MSI HawkMSI Gaming OCPowerColor OCVTX3D X-EditionPowerColor Devil

Comparison winner

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon R9 270X

MSI Radeon RX 580

Why is AMD Radeon R9 270X better than MSI Radeon RX 580?

• 2 more DVI outputs?
  2vs0

Why is MSI Radeon RX 580 better than AMD Radeon R9 270X?

• 207MHz faster GPU clock speed?
  1257MHzvs1050MHz
• 3.61 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
  6.17 TFLOPSvs2.56 TFLOPS
• 10.9 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  42.9 GPixel/svs32 GPixel/s
• 30W lower TDP?
  150Wvs180W
• 600MHz faster memory clock speed?
  2000MHzvs1400MHz
• 2400MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
  8000MHzvs5600MHz
• 113 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
  193 GTexels/svs80 GTexels/s
• 4x more VRAM?
  8GBvs2GB

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Gigabyte Radeon RX 6500 XT Gaming OC

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon R7 370

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon R9 390

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 560

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon R9 290

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Radeon R9 270X

1 User reviews

AMD Radeon R9 270X

7. 0/10

1 User reviews

MSI Radeon RX 580

1 User reviews

MSI Radeon RX 580

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

7.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

6.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Fan noise

3.0/10

1 votes

6.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1050MHz

1257MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1050MHz

1340MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

32 GPixel/s

42.9 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

2.56 TFLOPS

6.17 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

80 GTexels/s

193 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1400MHz

2000MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

5600MHz

8000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

179GB/s

256GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon R9 270X

✖MSI Radeon RX 580

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon R9 270X

✔MSI Radeon RX 580

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI Radeon RX 580)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon R9 270X

✖MSI Radeon RX 580

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon R9 270X

✔MSI Radeon RX 580

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon R9 270X

✖MSI Radeon RX 580

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI Radeon RX 580)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon R9 270X

✔MSI Radeon RX 580

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 270X)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

What Is CrossFire & List Of CrossFire Compatible Cards

If you want a multi-GPU setup, you should know what AMD CrossFire is. Here is the ultimate guide to AMD CrossFire, including all CrossFire compatible GPUs.

By Branko Gapo

October 26, 2021

The concept of a multi-GPU setup was all the rage in the 2000s. AMD wasn’t willing to be left behind, so they released CrossFire.

Since that time, the list of CrossFire compatible cards has grown exponentially but the technology itself ultimately hit a wall. Read on to find out what CrossFire is and what exactly went wrong.

The dream of having multiple graphics cards hooked into one PC and utilizing the power of those cards at the same time seemed like a crazy idea. In 2004, NVIDIA was the first company to market this idea with their SLI (Scalable Link Interface) technology. AMD soon followed suit in 2005.

However, the drawbacks of both technologies persisted and ultimately led to their demise. This sequence of events was caused by two main factors: that the two graphics cards needed to be specifically optimized by the game developers and, more importantly, the fact that these technologies never delivered anywhere near double the performance.

Before looking at what happened later, let’s start at the beginning.

Table of ContentsShow

What Is AMD CrossFire?

The CrossFire technology operates in the same way as NVIDIA’s SLI: it pairs up two (or more) graphics cards in order to produce a single output. This means the image you see on your screen is created using multiple GPUs.

The cards are typically set up in a master-slave configuration, which means one card will have the position of a “master” while the others will have the position of “slave”. The master card is in charge of receiving the output from the slave card(s) and meshing it together into a coherent output.

There are two main operational modes for dual graphics card setups: Alternate Frame Rendering (AFR) and Split Frame Rendering (SFR).

As its name suggests, AFR assigns one card to produce one frame and the other card to produce the next frame, and so on. In the two-GPU configuration, the master card will, for example, process every odd frame while the slave processes every even frame.

In theory, this should make rendering the image happen more quickly and smoothly. However, due to connectivity and lag issues, users were often faced with micro-stuttering and, unfortunately, worse performances than those of a single graphics card.

SFR operates similarly in that it divides the workload between the cards, but it does so differently. It assigns each card a part of the screen to render and then relies on the master card to combine the images and display the correct output. Usually, the master card will work on the upmost part of the screen while the slave card works on the rest.

The biggest advantage Crossfire has over SLI is that it can use cards that aren’t the exact same model or from the same manufacturer. However, the cards need to be from the same series so, for example, an HD 5750 card could be successfully configured to run with an HD 5770,

AMD Hybrid CrossFireX

With such a cool name, you might think this technology has to be something good. It’s about as cool as the rest of the CrossFire technology, which, unfortunately, isn’t saying much.

In effect, Hybrid CrossFireX enables multi-GPU support for different types of graphics cards. For example, it allows a motherboard-integrated graphics card to link up with a discrete GPU.

In 2012, AMD apparently decided to step away from this great name and changed it to something simpler: AMD Dual Graphics. This technology allowed the company’s APUs to be linked with its GPUs.

What Happened And What’s Next For AMD CrossFire?

Despite the original promise of doubling graphical performance, it quickly became clear that the technology simply wouldn’t be able to fulfill that ambition. With each new generation of graphics cards, gamers hoped that those promises would finally be realized and they would be able to double their PC’s performance.

AMD’s GPUs slumped hard in the mid-2010s and fell behind in their battle with NVIDIA. It’s likely that, had CrossFire been able to fulfill its promise, things might have gone differently, but we will never truly know.

In all honesty, we can’t say that CrossFire was the only reason for AMD’s decline. After all, its chief competitor’s SLI technology didn’t fare significantly better.

However, NVIDIA gave its tech a boost and came up with NVLink, which still didn’t deliver doubled performance but was vastly superior to both SLI and CrossFire.

In contrast, AMD pretty much abandoned its dream of creating a viable multi-GPU technology and quietly retired CrossFire in 2017. Although its support via DirectX11 continued, AMD moved on to the ‘Multi GPU’ name or mGPU.

List Of CrossFire Compatible Cards

Below is a full list of all CrossFire-compatible AMD cards. Keep in mind that you can combine two cards from the same series.

• Radeon RX Vega 64
• Radeon RX Vega 56
• Radeon RX 590
• Radeon RX 580
• Radeon RX 570
• Radeon RX 560
• Radeon RX 480
• Radeon RX 470
• Radeon RX 460
• Radeon R9 380X
• Radeon R9 295X2
• Radeon R9 290
• Radeon R9 280X
• Radeon R9 280
• Radeon R9 270X
• Radeon R9 270
• Radeon R7 265
• Radeon R7 260X
• Radeon R7 260
• Radeon R7 250X
• Radeon R7 250
• Radeon R7 240
• Radeon HD 7970
• Radeon HD 7950
• Radeon HD 7870
• Radeon HD 7850
• Radeon HD 7770
• Radeon HD 7750
• Radeon HD 6990
• Radeon HD 6970
• Radeon HD 6950
• Radeon HD 6870
• Radeon HD 6850
• Radeon HD 6790
• Radeon HD 6770
• Radeon HD 6750
• Radeon HD 5970
• Radeon HD 5870
• Radeon HD 5850
• Radeon HD 5830
• Radeon HD 5770
• Radeon HD 5750
• Radeon HD 4870 X2
• Radeon HD 4850 X2
• Radeon HD 4890
• Radeon HD 4870
• Radeon HD 4850
• Radeon HD 4830
• Radeon HD 4770
• Radeon HD 4670
• Radeon HD 4650
• Radeon HD 4550
• Radeon HD 4350
• Radeon HD 3870 X2
• Radeon HD 3870
• Radeon HD 3850 X2
• Radeon HD 3850
• Radeon HD 3650
• Radeon HD 3470
• Radeon HD 3450

What Are NVIDIA CUDA Cores And How Do They Help PC Gaming?

Related Topics
Tags

• AMD

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon HD 7950


Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, Geekbench — OpenCL.

AMD Radeon R9 270X

Buy on Amazon


vs

AMD Radeon HD 7950

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1315.678 vs 1177.395
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.356 vs 5.685
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.314 vs 69.23
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 vs 7988
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 vs 7988































Launch date	8 October 2013 vs 31 January 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt vs 300 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	63.896 vs 63.74
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1315. 678 vs 1177.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.356 vs 5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	85.314 vs 69.23
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8068 vs 7988
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3706 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8068 vs 7988
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3706 vs 3699

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950

• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 89. 6 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s
• Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 315.389
• Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 1932 vs 1772




























Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	89.6 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	2,867 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
Maximum memory size	3 GB vs 2 GB
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	343.81 vs 315.389
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3350
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	1932 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950





































CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63. 896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1315.678 1177.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	85. 314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	315.389 343.81
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2











































Name	AMD Radeon R9 270X	AMD Radeon HD 7950
PassMark — G3D Mark	4923
PassMark — G2D Mark	611
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	63.896	63.74
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1315.678	1177.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.356	5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	85.314	69.23
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	315.389	343.81
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8068	7988
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3706	3699
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3359
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8068	7988
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3706	3699
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3359
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	1772	1932
Geekbench — OpenCL		82144

Compare specifications (specs)




























































































































	AMD Radeon R9 270X	AMD Radeon HD 7950
Architecture	GCN 1. 0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Curacao	Tahiti
Design	AMD Radeon R9 200 Series	AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series
Launch date	8 October 2013	31 January 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$449
Place in performance rating	321	398
Price now	$399
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	16. 05
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1250 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,688 gflops	2,867 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	1792
Stream Processors	1280	1792
Texture fill rate	84 GTexel / s	89.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt	300 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	4,313 million
Compute units		28
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
Bus support	PCIe 3. 0	PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2 x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
Length		267 mm
DirectX	12	11
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	179. 2 GB/s	240 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Memory clock speed		1250 MHz
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
PowerTune
ZeroCore

Radeon RX 580 vs Radeon R9 270X


Radeon RX 580 vs Radeon R9 270X




1. Home
2. VGA Benchmarks
3. Radeon RX 580 vs Radeon R9 270X

• Radeon RX 580

  209%

• Radeon R9 270X

  100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 580

109% higher gaming performance.

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Supports FreeSync

Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports TrueAudio

Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Radeon R9 270X

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports Mantle

Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

---

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 580

The Radeon RX 580 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (6 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration

	Radeon RX 580		Radeon R9 270X
GPU Name	Ellesmere (Ellesmere XT)	vs	Curacao (Curacao XT)
Fab Process	14 nm	vs	28 nm
Die Size	232 mm²	vs	212 mm²
Transistors	5,700 million	vs	2,800 million
Shaders	2304	vs	1280
Compute Units	36	vs	20
Core clock	1120 MHz	vs	1000 MHz
ROPs	32	vs	32
TMUs	144	vs	80

Memory Configuration

	Radeon RX 580		Radeon R9 270X
Memory Type	GDDR5	vs	GDDR5
Bus Width	256 bit	vs	256 bit
Memory Speed	2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective	vs	1400 MHz 5600 MHz effective
Memory Size	8192 Mb	vs	2048 Mb

Additional details

	Radeon RX 580		Radeon R9 270X
TDP	150 watts	vs	180 watts
Release Date	1 Apr 2017	vs	8 Oct 2013

• Radeon RX 580

  40. 50 GP/s

• Radeon R9 270X

  32.00 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

• Radeon RX 580

  182.30 GT/s

• Radeon R9 270X

  80.00 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

• Radeon RX 580

  256.00 GB/s

• Radeon R9 270X

  179.00 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

• Radeon RX 580

  5834.00 GFLOPs

• Radeon R9 270X

  2560.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• Radeon RX 580

  89

• Radeon R9 270X

  42

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• Radeon RX 580

  63

• Radeon R9 270X

  27

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• Radeon RX 580

  61

• Radeon R9 270X

  28

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• Radeon RX 580

  46

• Radeon R9 270X

  21

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• Radeon RX 580

  31

• Radeon R9 270X

  22

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• Radeon RX 580

  26

• Radeon R9 270X

  11

FPS (higher is better)

	VS
Radeon RX 580		GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

	VS
Radeon RX 580		GeForce GTX 1060

	VS
Radeon R9 270X		Radeon RX 550

	VS
Radeon R9 270X		Radeon R9 370X

	VS
Radeon RX 5500		GeForce GTX 1660

	VS
GeForce GTX 1660		Radeon R9 Nano

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

log 20. 19:22:03

#0 checking url part for id 5061 +0s … 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5062 +0s … 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5060 +0s … 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:27:01 +0200 +0s … 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.052s … 0.052s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 002s … 0.054s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.054s

#8 composed specs +0s … 0.054s

#9 did output specs +0s … 0.054s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.054s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 5061 +0.04s … 0.094s

#12 got single benchmarks 5061 +0s … 0.094s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 5062 +0.008s … 0.102s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.103s

#15 got single benchmarks 5062 +0.01s … 0.113s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.116s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.118s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.118s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.118s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.118s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.118s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.118s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 5060 +0s … 0.118s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.118s

#25 got single benchmarks 5060 +0.006s … 0.124s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.124s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.124s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.125s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.125s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.126s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.126s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.126s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.126s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.126s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.126s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.127s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.127s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.127s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.127s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.127s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.128s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.128s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.128s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.128s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.128s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.129s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.129s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.129s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.129s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.129s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.13s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.13s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.13s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.13s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.13s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.131s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.131s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.131s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.131s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.132s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.133s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.133s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.133s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.133s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.133s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.134s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.134s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.134s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.134s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.134s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.135s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.135s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.135s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.135s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.135s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.136s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0. 001s … 0.136s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.137s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.138s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.138s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.139s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.139s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.14s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.14s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.141s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.141s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.141s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.142s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.142s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.143s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.143s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.143s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.144s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.144s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.144s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.144s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.144s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.146s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.146s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.146s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.147s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.147s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.147s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.147s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.148s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.148s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.149s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.149s

#123 min, max, avg, median took s +0s … 0.15s

#124 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.15s

#125 Got 462 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s … 0.17s

#126 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.17s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.171s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.171s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.171s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#243 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#266 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#277 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#297 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#300 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#301 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#302 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#306 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#307 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#309 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#312 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#317 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#320 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#323 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#325 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#326 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#328 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#331 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#336 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#342 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#343 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#344 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#345 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#347 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#351 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.175s

#357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#359 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#367 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#368 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#370 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.175s

#371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#374 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#379 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#381 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.175s

#385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#389 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#390 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.175s

#399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#404 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#410 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.176s

#413 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#414 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#415 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#416 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#422 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#425 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.176s

#427 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#436 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#437 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#440 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.176s

#441 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#444 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#448 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#450 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.176s

#455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#457 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#459 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#460 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.176s

#461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.177s

#469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#480 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.177s

#483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#484 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#487 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#490 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#491 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#492 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#493 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#494 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#495 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#496 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.177s

#497 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#498 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#499 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#500 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#501 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#502 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#503 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#504 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#505 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.178s

#506 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s … 0.184s

#507 benchmarks composed for output. +0.066s … 0.25s

#508 calculated avg scores. +0s … 0.25s

#509 return log +0.001s … 0.251s

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon RX 580X

VS

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and AMD Radeon RX 580X in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results.
It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

AMD Radeon R9 270X

AMD Radeon RX 580X

General Information

203

Place in performance rating

132

36.84

Value for money (0-100)

no data

GCN 1.0

Architecture

GCN 4.0

Curacao

Code name

Polaris 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

8 October 2013

Release date

11 April 2018

$199

Launch price (MSRP)

no data

$150

Price now

no data

reference

Design

no data

Technical Specifications

1280

Pipelines

2304

no data

Core clock speed

1257 MHz

1050 MHz

Boost Clock

1340 MHz

2,800 million

Transistor count

5,700 million

28 nm

Manufacturing process technology

14 nm

180 Watt

Power consumption (TDP)

185 Watt

84. 00

Texture fill rate

193.0

2,688 gflops

Floating-point performance

6,175 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 3.0 x16

Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

no data

Length

241 mm

2 x 6-pin

Supplementary power connectors

1x 8-pin

PCIe 3.0

Bus support

no data

RAM Frequency and Speed

GDDR5

Memory type

GDDR5

2 GB

Maximum RAM amount

8 GB

256 Bit

Memory bus width

256 Bit

no data

Memory clock speed

8000 MHz

179.2 GB/s

Memory bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

—

Shared memory

no data

Port and Display Support

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Display Connectors

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

+

Eyefinity

no data

+

HDMI

no data

+

DisplayPort support

no data

Technologies

+

AppAcceleration

no data

+

CrossFire

no data

+

FreeSync

no data

+

HD3D

no data

+

LiquidVR

no data

+

TressFX

no data

+

TrueAudio

no data

+

DDMA audio

no data

+

UVD

no data

API support

DirectX® 12

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4. 6

OpenGL

4.6

+

Vulkan

no data

Popular comparisons with these video cards

1.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. Intel UHD Graphics 630
2.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
3.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon RX 550
4.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
5.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
6.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
7.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon 620

0026 2 vs 0

Why is MSI Radeon RX 580 better than AMD Radeon R9 270X?

• GPU frequency 207MHz higher?
  1257MHz vs 1050MHz
• 3. 61 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
  6.17 TFLOPS vs 2.56 TFLOPS
• 10.9 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  42.9 GPixel/s vs 32 GPixel/s
• 30W below TDP?
  150W vs 180W
• 600MHz faster memory speed?
  2000MHz vs 1400MHz
• 2400MHz higher effective clock speed?
  8000MHz vs 5600MHz
• 113 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
  193 GTexels/s vs 80 GTexels/s
• 4x more VRAM?
  8GB vs 2GB

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon R9 270X

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

270X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon R7 370

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

AMD Radeon R9 270x

VS

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

MSI Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon R9 390 9000

AMD Radeon Radeon Radeon 270004 vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 560

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

AMD Radeon R9 270X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

MSI Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti3 AMD 9002 Laptop00228 10. 0 /10

1 Reviews Users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

10.0 /10

1 VOTES 9000 9000 9000 9028 / 10

1 Votes

10.0 /10

1 Votes

003

Fan noise

3.0 /10

1 Votes

6.0 /10

1 VOTES

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 VOTES 9000 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1050MHz

1257MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.Turbo GPU

1050MHz

1340MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

32 GPixel/s

42.9 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4. flops

2.56 TFLOPS

6.17 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

80 GTexels/s

193 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1400MHz

2000MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

5600MHz

8000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

179GB/s

256GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

256bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. versions of GDDR memory

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Radeon R9 270X

✖MSI Radeon RX 580

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon R9 270X

✔MSI Radeon RX 580

The video card has the ability to connect multiple displays. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (MSI Radeon RX 580)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon R9 270X

✖MSI Radeon RX 580

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon R9 270X

✔MSI Radeon RX 580

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8. supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon R9270X

✖MSI Radeon RX 580

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (MSI Radeon RX 580)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon R9 270X

✔MSI Radeon RX 580

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI version 3

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9 270X)

HDMI 2.0

New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003

Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon RX 580X. Comparative characteristics and benchmarks of video cards

VS

AMD Radeon R9 270X

AMD Radeon RX 580X

General information

The general information section of the video card comparison list contains information on the release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between AMD Radeon R9270X and AMD Radeon RX 580X. Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.

258

Position in the performance rating

174

36.84

Cost ratio

No data

GCN

003

Polaris 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

8 October 2013 (8 YEARS AGO)

Date of Output

11 APRIL 2018 (3 YEARS AGO)

$ 199000 9000 9000 9000 9000 $ 327 (1.6x MSRP)

Actual price

$ 191

Reference

Design

No data

6.66

The cost and quality ratio

63.70

9000 Curacao XT

GPU Code Name

Polaris 20

Desktop

Market Segment

Desktop

Specifications

and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part contained in the ranking of video cards.

1280

Conveyors

2304

No data

Frequency of the nucleus

1257 MHZ

1050 MHZ

Acceleration

1340 MHZ

2. 800 Million

0004 9000 28 Nm 9000 9000 9000 nm

180 Watt

Power consumption (TDP)

185 Watt

84.00

Number of texels processed in 1 second

9270X and AMD Radeon RX 580X. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

PCIe 3.0 X16

Interface

PCIE 3.0 X16

No data

length

241 mm

2 x 6-PIN

1x 8-pin

PCIe 3.0

Bus support

N/A

Memory (frequency and overclocking)

Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between AMD Radeon R9 270X and AMD Radeon RX 580X:

GDDR5

256 Bit

Memory bus width

256 Bit

No data

Memory frequency

8000 MHz

179. 2 GB/S

Memorial capacity

256.0 GB/S

—

DECARITED memory

No data 9,0003

Support for ports and displays

Let’s find out the difference in the ports that are equipped with the AMD Radeon R9 270x and 270x and 3 AMD Radeon RX 580X. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Display connections

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

+

EYEFINITY

No data

+

HDMI

+

+

DisplayPort Support

No data

Technologies

Let’s see what is the difference. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.

+

AppAcceleration

n.a.

1

CrossFire

n.a.0003

+

HD3D

No data

1

Liquidvr

No data

—

PowerTune

—

ZeroCore

n.a.

+

DDMA audio

n.a.0004 UVD

N/A

API support

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon RX 580X is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

DirectX® 12

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

+

Vulkan n/a

Vulkan n/a

0003

5.1

Shader Model

No data

1.2

OpenCl

No data

—

MANTLE

9000 Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards

one.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon RX 550
2.		AMD Radeon R9270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
3.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. Intel UHD Graphics 630
four.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
5.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon RX 550X
6.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
7.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
eight.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
9.		AMD Radeon R9270X vs. Intel HD Graphics 520
ten.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon 620
eleven.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon RX 570
12.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs. AMD Radeon RX 580X
13.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. Intel UHD Graphics 620
fourteen.		AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
fifteen.		AMD Radeon R9270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Comparison of AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 270X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 270X video cards according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan ( Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)

versus

AMD Radeon R9 270X

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)

• Newer graphics card, release date difference 3 year(s) 6 month3(s) 9025 28% more: 1340 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 2297. 1x more texture speed: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 84 GTexel / s
• 80% more shader processors: 2304 vs 1280 914 nm vs 28 nm — Graphics Score about 98% higher: 3510 vs 1772

Release date	18 April 2017 vs 8 October 2013
Boost core clock	1340 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texturing speed	192.96 GTexel/s vs 84 GTexel/s
Number of shaders	2304 vs 1280
Process	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8GB vs 2GB
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	3510 vs 1772

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon R9 270X

• 433. 5 times greater floating point performance: 2,688 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
• Approximately 3% less power consumption: 180 Watt vs 185 Watt

Floating point performance	2.688 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt vs 185 Watt

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X

3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)	AMD Radeon R9 270X
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	3510	1772
PassMark — G3D Mark		4923
PassMark — G2D Mark		611
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		63.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1315.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		85.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		315.389
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		8068
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)		3706
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)		3350
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		8068
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)		3706
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)		3350

Performance comparison

conveyors

	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)	AMD Radeon R9 270X
Architecture	GCN 4. 0	GCN 1.0
Codename	Polaris 20	Curacao
Design	Radeon RX 500 Series	AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Generation GCN	4th Gen
Issue date	April 18, 2017	October 8, 2013
Price at first issue date	$301.69	$199
Place in the ranking	320	321
Price now	$169. 99	$399
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	62.57	16.05
Boost core clock	1340 MHz	1050 MHz
Number of Compute	36
Core frequency	1257 MHz
Floating point performance	6.2 TFLOPs	2.688 gflops
Process	14nm	28nm
Number of shaders	2304	1280
Pixel fill rate	42. 88GP/s
Render output units	32
Stream Processors	2304	1280
Texturing Speed ​​	192.96 GTexel/s	84 GTexel/s
Texture Units	144
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	180 Watt
Number of transistors	5,700 million	2,800 million
Video connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA
DisplayPort support
Support Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
CrossFire without bridge
Interface	MXM-B (3. 0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Notebook size	large
Recommended power supply	500 Watt
Tire		PCIe 3.0
Additional power connectors		2 x 6-pin
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulcan
Maximum memory size	8GB	2GB
Memory Bandwidth	256 GB/s	179. 2 GB/s
Memory bus width	256bit	256 Bit
Memory frequency	8000MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
4K h364 Decode
4K h364 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
App Acceleration
CrossFire
FreeSync
h365/HEVC Decode
h365/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
DDMA audio
HD3D
TressFX

AMD Radeon RX 580 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 comparison which is better?

Home / AMD Radeon RX 580 VS AMD Radeon R9 390

AMD Radeon RX 580

89%

Devicelist

VS

AMD Radeon R9

52%

9000 specifications of AMD Radeon RX 580 and AMD Radeon R9 390 and compiled a list of benefits and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparison winner

Value for money

55.1% 20.9% (61.1%) better than vs 34.2%

Release price

$229 -100$ (-30.4%) better than vs 329 $

Boost frequency

1340 MHz At 340 MHz (34%) better than vs 1000 MHz

Process

14 nm -14 nm (-50%) better than vs 28 nm

Power Demand (TDP)

185 W -90 W (-32.7%) better than vs 275 W

Memory frequency

8000 MHz At 7000 MHz (700%) better than vs 1000 MHz

Advantage AMD Radeon R9 390

Number of shaders

2560 256 (11. 1%) better than vs 2304

Memory bus width

512 bits 256 bits (100%) better than vs 256 bit

Memory bandwidth

384 128 (50%) better than vs 256

General information
Value for money The sum of all the benefits of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
55.1% 20.9% (61.1%) better than	34.2%
Architecture
GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Codename
Polaris 20	Grenada
Type
Desktop	Desktop
Release price
$229 -100 $ (-30. 4%) better than	329 $
Number of shaders
2304	2560 256 (11.1%) better than
Core clock
1257MHz	n/a
Boost frequency
1340 MHz At 340 MHz (34%) better than	1000 MHz
Number of transistors
5.700 million	6.200 million
Process
14 nm -14 nm (-50%) better than	28 nm
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
185W -90 W (-32.7%) better than	275 W
Length
241 mm	275 mm
Additional power connectors
1x 8-pin	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
n/a	+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
n/a	0.95 Gh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
n/a	1 Sol/s
Tire
n/a	PCIe 3.0
Design
n/a	reference
CrossFire without bridge
n/a	+
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
n/a	—
Eyefinity
n/a	+
Number of Eyefinity monitors
n/a	6
HDMI
DisplayPort ready
FreeSync
n/a	+
PowerTune
n/a	+
TrueAudio
n/a	+
VCE
n/a	+
Audio DDMA
n/a	+
OpenCL
n/a	2. 0
Mantle
n/a	+
Video connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DirectX
12 (12_0)	DirectX® 12
Floating point performance
6.175 gflops	5.120 gflops
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
n/a	29.26 Mh/s
CrossFire
n/a	+

Benchmark

Memory
Type of memory
GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
8 GB	n/a
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.
256bit	512 bit 256 bits (100%) better than
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
8000 MHz At 7000 MHz (700%) better than	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth The greater the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.
256	384 128 (50%) better than

Comparison of AMD Radeon R7 370 and AMD Radeon R9 270

Comparison of AMD Radeon R7 370 and AMD Radeon R9 270 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API Support, Memory, Technology Support. Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 370

VS

AMD Radeon R9 270

Advantages

Reasons select AMD Radeon R7 370

• Reverse, difference in production dates 1 YEAR (S) 7 MontH (S)
• 5% more core clock in Boost mode: 975 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Approximately 36% less power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 2x the maximum memory size(s): 4 GB vs 2 GB
• in the PassMark benchmark — G3D Mark is about 6% more: 4453 vs 4213
• About 17% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 86561 vs 74175
• About 30% more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.514 vs 55.721
• DesktopBench5 benchmark — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 18% more: 1506.404 vs 1282.039
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop performance — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 23% more: 7.267 vs 5.927
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 25% more: 116.279 vs 93.116
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 37% more: 359.237 vs 261.843
• 2.1 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7102 vs 3448
• 2.1 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7102 vs 3448 902 4453 vs 4213 Geekbench — OpenCL 86561 vs 74175 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 72.514 vs 55.721 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames /s) 1506. 404 vs 1282.039 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.267 vs 5.927 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.279 vs 93.116 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 359.237 vs 261.843 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7102 vs 3448 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3699 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3347 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7102 vs 3448 These video cards are often used for cryptocurrency mining, respectively, they are subjected to “overclocking” and firmware modification in PROM. Therefore, we remind you that “overclocking”, like any other interference with the normal operation of the device, may lead to the removal of the warranty. Find similar graphics card0901 575 Geekbench — OpenCL GPU 1 86561 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) GPU 1 72.514

  55.721

  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

  90

  02

  GPU 1 7.267 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) GPU 1 116.279

  93.116

  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s ) GPU 1 359.237

  261.843

  GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) GPU 1 7102 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) GPU 1 3707 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) GPU 1 3359 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) GPU 1 7102 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) GPU 1 3707 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) GPU 1 3359 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1506.404 1282.039 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.267 5.927 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.279 93.116 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 359.237 261.843 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7102 3448 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3699 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3347 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7102 3448 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3699 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359

  On this page below there are links to download the latest free drivers for the AMD Radeon R7 370 graphics card, which is part of the Radeon R7 300 series. The installation files are taken from the official website and are suitable for: Windows 7, 10, 8, 8.1 32/64 -bit (x86/x64).

  For the convenience of selecting the necessary files, the version of your Windows and its bit depth («bit depth») are indicated below.

  Your computer is running on:

  Download (153.5 MB / version 16.8.2 (Crimson Edition 16.8.2 Hotfix) / release date 08/12/2016)
  Memorial type GDDR5 GDDR5 Separated memory 0

  PASE, reviews and real reviews video card AMD Radeon R7 370, which is part of the Radeon R7 300 series. The installation files are taken from the official website and are suitable for: Windows 7, 10, 8, 8.

  1 32/64-bit (x86/x64).

  For the convenience of selecting the files you need, the version of your Windows and its bit depth (“bit depth”) are listed below.

  Your computer is running on:

  Download (153.5 MB / version 16.8.2 (Crimson Edition 16.8.2 Hotfix) / release date 08/12/2016)

  For Windows 7 32-bit

  Download (239.8 MB / version 16.8 .2 (Crimson Edition 16.8.2 Hotfix) / release date 08/12/2016)

  For Windows 7 64-bit

  Download (134.8 MB / version 16.8.2 (Crimson Edition 16.8.2 Hotfix) / release date 08/12/2016 )

  For Windows 10 32-bit

  Download (208.24 MB / version 16.8.2 (Crimson Edition 16.8.2 Hotfix) / release date 08/12/2016)

  For Windows 10 64-bit

  Download (205 MB / version 14.4 (Catalyst Software Suite) / release date 04/25/2014)

  For Windows 8 32-bit

  Download (260 MB / version 14.4 (Catalyst Software Suite) / release date 04/25/2014)

  For Windows 8 64-bit

  Download (154. 21 MB / version 16.8.2 (Crimson Edition 16.8.2 Hotfix) / release date 08/12/2016)

  For Windows 8.1 32-bit

  Download (239.88 MB / version 16.8.2 (Crimson Edition 16.8.2 Hotfix) / release date 08/12/2016)

  For Windows 8.1 64-bit

  Help with the search? Please like or vote!

  MSI continues to please its fans with more and more variety of the rather successful MSI GAMING line designed for real gamers who are not averse to while away another evening with the next novelty of the gaming industry.

  This time we’ll talk about the MSI Radeon R7 370 GAMING 4G , which compares favorably with a proprietary cooler and factory overclocking. It is a version of the AMD Radeon R7 370, the main characteristics of which you can find in the ASUS STRIX R7 370 review. Recall that, in essence, the AMD Radeon R7 370 is nothing more than a modified AMD Radeon R7 265 with support for new technologies and increased clock speeds. frequencies. Let’s take a closer look at what other features the new product from MSI stands out against the background of other modifications of this video accelerator.