R9 fury vs 1060: R9 FURY vs GTX 1060 6GB Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-4790K vs i7-6700K)

11 июля, 2022

AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060: What is the difference?

45points

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

54points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Why is AMD Radeon R9 Fury better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060?

  • 3.31 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    7.17 TFLOPSvs3.85 TFLOPS
  • 103.5 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    224 GTexels/svs120.5 GTexels/s
  • 319.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    512GB/svs192.2GB/s
  • 3904bit wider memory bus width?
    4096bitvs192bit
  • 2304 more shading units?
    3584vs1280
  • 4500million more transistors?
    8900 millionvs4400 million
  • 144 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
    224vs80
  • 0.8 newer version of OpenCL?
    2vs1. 2

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 better than AMD Radeon R9 Fury?

  • 506MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1506MHzvs1000MHz
  • 8.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    72.3 GPixel/svs64 GPixel/s
  • 155W lower TDP?
    120Wvs275W
  • 1502MHz faster memory clock speed?
    2002MHzvs500MHz
  • 7008MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    8008MHzvs1000MHz
  • 1.5x more VRAM?
    6GBvs4GB
  • Supports ray tracing?
  • 12nm smaller semiconductor size?
    16nmvs28nm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

Asus R9 Nano

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

AMD Radeon RX 590

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

AMD Radeon R9 290X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

AMD Radeon RX 470

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

Asus Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Manli GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

0 User reviews

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

7.3/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

7.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

7.0/10

3 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

7.0/10

3 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

 

7.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

7.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1000MHz

1506MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 Fury)

1708MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

64 GPixel/s

72.3 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

7.17 TFLOPS

3.85 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

224 GTexels/s

120.5 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

500MHz

2002MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

1000MHz

8008MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

512GB/s

192.2GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

4096bit

192bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 Fury)

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon R9 Fury

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon R9 Fury

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 Fury)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon R9 Fury

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon R9 Fury

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon R9 Fury

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 Fury)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon R9 Fury

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 1.4

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon R9 Fury Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon R9 Fury you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 Fury will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Radeon R9 Fury

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Radeon R9 Fury
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 275 Watt
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 6.144 MB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
 

Check Price
  • Radeon R9 Fury has 129% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 Fury.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 Fury — with GCN 1.2.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 Fury — by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 7500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 Fury.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 50−55 50−55
ultra / 1080p 35−40 30−35
QHD / 1440p 27−30 27−30
4K / 2160p 16−18 14−16
low / 720p 80−85 75−80
medium / 1080p 60−65 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 4% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
high / 1080p 80−85 75−80
ultra / 1080p 70−75 70−75
QHD / 1440p 55−60 55−60
4K / 2160p 30−33 27−30
low / 720p 130−140 130−140
medium / 1080p 90−95 85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Battlefield 5 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 230−240 230−240
QHD / 1440p 150−160 150−160
4K / 2160p 100−110 100−110
high / 768p 220−230 220−230
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p 70−75 70−75
medium / 1080p 50−55 50−55
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 110−120 110−120
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 65−70 65−70
ultra / 1080p 60−65 60−65
QHD / 1440p 40−45 40−45
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 100−110 100−110
medium / 1080p 70−75 65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Far Cry 5 is 1% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
high / 1080p 95−100 90−95
ultra / 1080p 75−80 70−75
QHD / 1440p 45−50 45−50
4K / 2160p 21−24 21−24
low / 720p 220−230 220−230
medium / 1080p 150−160 140−150
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
high / 1080p 90−95 85−90
ultra / 1080p 70−75 65−70
QHD / 1440p 50−55 50−55
4K / 2160p 35−40 30−35
low / 720p 140−150 130−140
medium / 1080p 95−100 90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
low / 768p 160−170 160−170
medium / 768p 150−160 150−160
high / 1080p 100−110 95−100
ultra / 1080p 50−55 45−50
QHD / 1440p 40−45 40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
high / 1080p 40−45 35−40
ultra / 1080p 30−35 30−35
QHD / 1440p 24−27 24−27
4K / 2160p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 95−100 95−100
medium / 1080p 55−60 50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Metro Exodus is 4% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p 80−85 75−80
ultra / 1080p 60−65 55−60
4K / 2160p 18−20 18−20
low / 720p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 90−95 85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
high / 1080p 35−40 35−40
ultra / 1080p 24−27 24−27
QHD / 1440p 18−20 16−18
4K / 2160p 12−14 10−12
low / 720p 95−100 95−100
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p 190−200 180−190
medium / 768p 130−140 120−130
high / 1080p 75−80 70−75
ultra / 1080p 40−45 40−45
4K / 2160p 27−30 24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
low / 768p 130−140 120−130
ultra / 1080p 65−70 65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Radeon R9 Fury
Architecture Pascal GCN 1.2
Code name GP106 Fiji
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 19 July 2016 16 June 2015
Pipelines 1280 3584
Core clock speed 1506 MHz
Boost Clock 1708 MHz 1000 MHz
Transistor count 4,400 million 8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 136. 7 224.0
Floating-point performance 4,375 gflops 7,168 gflops
Length 250 mm
Memory bus width 192 Bit 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 500 MHz
Memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s 512 GB/s
Shared memory — —
G-SYNC support +
VR Ready +
DirectX 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 2. 0
Vulkan 1.2.131 +
CUDA 6.1
G-SYNC +
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 800 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
Mantle +
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Compute units 56
AppAcceleration +
High bandwidth memory (HBM) +
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
FRTC +
 

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1070 mobile
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • Radeon R9 Fury vs GeForce GTX 1070 mobile
  • Radeon R9 Fury vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon R9 FURY X
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon Pro Duo
  • Radeon R9 Fury vs Radeon R9 FURY X
  • Radeon R9 Fury vs Radeon Pro Duo

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2 on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 8192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 1280 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 16 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q2 2015

Q3 2016
Model number

Fiji XT

GP106-400-A1
GPU name

Fiji

GP106
Architecture

GCN 3. 0

Pascal
Generation

Pirate Islands R9 300

GeForce 10
Lithography

28 nm

16 nm
Transistors

8.900.000.000

4.400.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

1,05 GHz

1,51 GHz
GPU boost clock

1,05 GHz

1,71 GHz
Memory frequency

500 MHz

2.002 MHz
Effective memory speed

1 GB/s

8 GB/s
Memory size

8 GB

6 GB
Memory type

HBM

GDDR5
Memory bus

8192 Bit

192 Bit
Memory bandwidth

1. 024,0 GB/s

192,2 GB/s
TDP

200 W

120 W
Suggested PSU 600W ATX Power Supply 400W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

—

—
Outputs

1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort

1x DVI
1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

128

10
Shading units (cuda cores)

8.192

1.280
TMUs

512

80
ROPs

128

48
Cache memory

4 MB

1,5 MB
Pixel fillrate

134,4 GP/s

82,0 GP/s
Texture fillrate

537,6 GT/s

136,7 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

17,2 TFLOPS

4,4 TFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2

17.204
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

4.375

The difference is 293%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X2 Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 FURY


GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 FURY


  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 FURY

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    100%

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    136%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 FURY
36% higher gaming performance.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports TrueAudio
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends Radeon R9 FURY

The Radeon R9 FURY is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (22 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 FURY
GPU Name TU107 () vs Fiji (Fiji PRO)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 0 mm² vs 596 mm²
Transistors unknown vs 8,900 million
Shaders 896 vs 3584
Compute Units 14 vs 56
Core clock 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 64
TMUs 56 vs 224

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 FURY
Memory Type GDDR5 vs HBM
Bus Width 128 bit vs 4096 bit
Memory Speed 2000 MHz

8000 MHz effective		 vs 500 MHz

1000 MHz effective
Memory Size 4096 Mb vs 4096 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 FURY
TDP 0 watts vs 275 watts
Release Date 30 Apr 2019 vs 10 Jul 2015

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    53. 28 GP/s

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    64.00 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    93.24 GT/s

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    224.00 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    128.00 GB/s

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    512.00 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    2984.00 GFLOPs

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    7168.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    52

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    48

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    53

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    66

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    62

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    76

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    48

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    81

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    55

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    72

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    77

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    92

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    22

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    36

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    56

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    57

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    42

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    51

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    54

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    95

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    51

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    58

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    32

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    38

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    39

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    52

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    42

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    53

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    31

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    53

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    38

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    55

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    49

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    70

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    17

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    38

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    40

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    27

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    36

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    39

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    71

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650

    35

  • Radeon R9 FURY

    48

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 570
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
VS
Radeon R9 FURY Radeon RX 5500
VS
Radeon R9 FURY GeForce GTX 1660
VS
Radeon RX 5500 XT GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GeForce GTX 1060, Radeon RX 480 czy Radeon R9 Fury — Test porównawczy

1. GeForce GTX 1060, Radeon RX 480 czy Radeon R9 Fury — Test porównawczy
2. Konstrukcje wykorzystane na potrzeby testów
3. Platforma testowa, metodologia
4. Wydajność — 3DMark Fire Strike / 3DMark Time Spy / Valley Benchmark
5. Wydajność — Battlefield 1 / Crysis 3 / Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
6. Wydajność — Gears of War 4 / Metro: Last Light Redux / Project CARS
7. Wydajność — Rise of the Tomb Raider / The Witcher 3 / Titanfall 2
8. Podkręcanie: maksymalny stabilny zegar GPU i VRAM
9. Podkręcanie: przyrost wydajności w grach
10. Temperatury, kultura pracy i zużycie energii
11. Podsumowanie

Mogłoby się wydawać, że sytuacja w średnim segmencie kart grafiki jest dość klarowna. Mamy bowiem dwa modele od dwóch różnych producentów, AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB oraz Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, które cechuje zbliżona cena i równie podobne osiągi. Konstrukcja Zielonych przeważnie notuje lekką przewagę w grach pod DX 11, ale jej rywal zza miedzy nadrabia po przejściu na nowsze środowisko, DX 12. I summa summarum panuje impas, prowadzący do wyborów opartych wyłącznie o preferencje. Niemniej jednak w cenie ok. 1400 — 1500 zł można aktualnie dostać jeszcze jeden akcelerator, AMD Radeon R9 Fury. To bliski flagowcowi produkt ubiegłej generacji, mający co prawda jedynie 4 GB pamięci, jednak zrealizowanej w ultraszybkiej technologii HBM. Według suchych danych technicznych model R9 Fury powinien rozjechać obydwa wywołane średniaki niczym walec — ale teoria to jedno, zaś praktyka drugie. Sprawdźmy zatem, jak to wygląda w rzeczywistości.

Niniejszy artykuł jest pierwszym testem kart grafiki opartym na nowej procedurze, uwzględniającej tytuły w środowisku DirectX 12. 

AMD Radeon R9 Fury zadebiutował na początku III kwartału 2015 roku, jako nieco tańsza alternatywa dla topowego wówczas (i de facto wciąż) akceleratora Czerwonych, R9 Fury X. Rzeczony model osiągnięto poprzez wyłączenie 8 z 64 dostępnych bloków obliczeniowych w układzie Fiji, będącym skądinąd jedną z największych struktur krzemowych w procesie technologicznym 28 nm — 8,9 mld tranzystorów na powierzchni 596 mm2. Tym sposobem narodziła się karta oferująca 3584 procesory strumieniowe, 224 jednostki teksturujące oraz 64 jednostki rasteryzujące. Oczywiście do tego doszły wspomniane już przeze mnie pośrednio cztery stosy pamięci HBM o pojemności 1 GB oraz szerokości magistrali 1024-bit każdy, co sumarycznie zapewniło 4 GB pamięci na 4096-bitowej szynie, osiągającej imponującą przepustowość 512 GB/s. Patrząc na powyższe dane naprawdę można odnieść wrażenie, że zarówno RX 480, jak i GTX 1060 prezentują się niezwykle blado. Niemniej skomplikowany i gęsty rdzeń Fiji ma też swoje wady. Największą z nich jest przywiązanie do stosunkowo niskich taktowań, choć nie można zarazem zapomnieć o szalenie wysokim TDP wynoszącym aż 275 W. Dla porównania, GTX 1060 emituje tylko 120 W energii cieplnej, zaś RX 480 — 150 W.





















  Sapphire

R9 Fury

Nitro		 XFX

RX 480

GTR Black		 Zotac

GTX 1060

AMP!
Proces technologiczny 28 nm 14 nm FinFET 16 nm FinFET
Architektura GCN 1. 2 Polaris (GCN 1.3) Pascal
Rozmiar rdzenia 596 mm2 232 mm2 200 mm2
GPU Fiji PRO Ellesmere XT GP106-400
Liczba tranzystorów 8,9 miliarda 5,7 milarda 4,4 milarda
SM/CU 56 36 10
SPU 3584 2304 1280
TMU 224 144 80
ROP 64 32 48
Typ i ilość VRAM 4GB HBM 8GB GDDR5 6GB GDDR5
Zegar bazowy 1050 MHz 1120 MHz 1557 MHz
Zegar Boost nd. 1338 MHz 1771 MHz
Rzeczywisty zegar pamięci 500 MHz 2000 MHz 2000 MHz
Efektywny zegar pamięci 1000 MHz 8000 MHz 8000 MHz
Magistrala danych 4096-bit 256-bit 192-bit
Przepustowość pamięci 512 GB/s 256 GB/s 192 GB/s
TDP 275 W 150 W 120 W
Złącza zasilania 2x 8-pin 1x 8-pin 1x 6-pin
Cena ok. 1450 zł ok. 1300 zł ok. 1350 zł

Rozszerzając kwestię taktowań — jako, iż R9 Fury nie był nigdy dostępny w wersji referencyjnej, AMD mogło tylko sugerować pewne wartości swym partnerom. Wypożyczony na potrzeby niniejszego testu Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro ma zegar rdzenia równy ledwie 1050 MHz, co prawdę powiedziawszy i tak jest wartością wysoką jak na chip Fiji. Pamięci zaś pracują z rzeczywistą częstotliwością 500 MHz, aczkolwiek to akurat przy modułach HBM nie ma to większego znaczenia, bowiem przepustowość dalej pozostaje poza zasięgiem dzisiejszych rywali. Jak taktowanie chipu wygląda na tle nowszych średniaków, zwłaszcza GTX 1060, widać w powyższej tabeli. A pamiętajcie przy tym, że 1771 MHz w trybie Boost podawane dla Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 to wartość minimalna, która w praktyce rośnie do okolic 1900 MHz. Potwierdził to przeprowadzony w przeszłości test tego modelu. Co więcej, nawet niesłynący z bardzo wysokich taktowań RX 480 «tyka» zauważalnie szybciej od R9 Fury. Już teraz mogę zdradzić, że prezentowany XFX Radeon RX 480 GTR Black Edition swobodnie utrzymuje deklarowane 1338 MHz. Cały dzisiejszy pojedynek zapowiada się więc bardzo emocjonująco, zwłaszcza, iż po raz pierwszy korzystam z nowej procedury testowej dla kart grafiki, uwzględniającej szereg nowych gier — także takich opartych na DX 12.  

  • Spodobało Ci się? Podziel się ze znajomymi!

  • Udostępnij

  • Tweetnij

  • Skomentuj

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review, Benchmark, & Architecture Drill-Down vs. GTX 980 Ti | GamersNexus

Cooling Solutions

The EVGA 980 Ti Hybrid is the key differentiator for this benchmark. Both the Fury X and 980 Ti Hybrid utilize CLCs for thermal dissipation, but execute their cooling solutions in a markedly different fashion.

In the case of the R9 Fury X, AMD liquid cools its GPU, high-bandwidth memory (VRAM), and VRM with a Cooler Master CLC, defined here. The EVGA GTX 980 Ti Hybrid uses an Asetek-sourced CLC to cool the GPU, but combines (see: “hybrid”) a blower fan and alloy heatsink for VRM and VRAM cooling.

Cooler Master’s CLC uses FEP tubes – more rigid and plastic in design, but capable of insulating liquid for lower thermals – while Asetek’s solution deploys rubber tubing. FEP tubes are less pliable than the rubber alternative and the internal teflon coating can crack when kinked or bent with a great enough force. Unlike the EVGA / Asetek solution, this is not coupled with a more traditional on-card air cooler. The EVGA unit is still considerably quieter and cooler than a 980 Ti reference cooler and, given its reliance on liquid, deserves to be checked for whine in a similar fashion to AMD’s Fury X.

AMD R9 Fury X Cooling Design and Impact on Power

AMD’s R9 Fury X utilizes a Cooler Master CLC for its GPU cooling. No board partner modifications are permitted with the Fury X – they’re all entirely regulated by AMD.

The video card itself is roughly 7.5” in length, though the somewhat stiff FEP tubing restricts tube bending to a point of adding an effective 1” to card length. Underneath a user-serviceable shroud rests the Cooler Master pump, situated atop a copper coldplate using standard liquid cooling methodology. A copper coldplate extends into the pump block, where microfins are cooled by liquid pumped through a lower channel.

FEP tubing employs a plastic inner lining that reduces loss of liquid through interface permeation and evaporation, but – as with all technologies – comes with a few downsides. Bending the tubes beyond their minimum bend radius can cause the plastic to crack, meaning liquid loss over time that will contribute to overheating and early death of the GPU. Installing the radiator must be done with great care to ensure that the tubes aren’t tweaked in any particular direction. For comparative purposes, many of the most popular CLCs on the market are made by Asetek (including Corsair’s, NZXT’s, the EVGA Hybrid, and others), who use a thick rubber wall that offers more flexibility and an easier install. It’s our understanding that the cost of Asetek hardware is greater than what’s made by Cooler Master, likely an indication of AMD’s choice to opt for the FEP solution.

The radiator uses a bulked-up liquid chamber to ensure longevity of the cooling solution with a back-up supply of liquid. This combined with AMD’s installation requirements, make for a somewhat irritating install process in some enclosures. It is strongly advised by AMD to install the radiator with the tubes at the lower side of the radiator, a difficult task at times given the inflexibility of the FEP tubing.

Unlike EVGA’s Hybrid, AMD’s R9 Fury X completely ditches on-card fans. The Fury X uses only the CLC and radiator + fan setup, using liquid to cool the VRM and VRAM; competing CLC-cooled solutions still utilize a VRM/VRAM fan with the GPU coldplate.

Using a CLC helps keep temperatures down, obviously, but has some more important value-adds that aren’t necessarily as obvious. Keeping the transistors at lower operating temperatures will ensure less power leakage and ensure longer lifespan of internal components. The liquid-cooled transistors’ reduced power leakage goes hand-in-hand with AMD’s attempt at a smaller power envelope overall, keeping the R9 Fury X under 300W.

If it weren’t for radiator install restrictions – like in situations where a user might already have a CPU CLC – I’d say that liquid-cooled high-end video cards were assuredly the way of the future. For the most part, our team does feel this is true for the current “Big GPU” architecture, but it’s also not entirely necessary if enclosure cooling is efficient enough. Reducing the thermal footprint is good for the entire system, it’s just that not every case allows a second radiator.

Radeon R9 Fury X Thermals at Equilibrium

Note: We use a Z97 platform for thermal testing, but an X99 platform for game testing.

This thermal chart shows the temperatures (dT over ambient of 21C) at equilibrium. This is the highest average we collected during thermal benchmarking. See page 1 for test methodology in greater depth.

The R9 Fury X is substantially cooler than its air-cooled AMD counterparts – a marked improvement over AMD’s 90C+ recent past. NVidia’s combination of lower TDP and Asetek CLC make for a substantially cooler load temperature.

It is worth noting that AMD’s increased thermals are likely tied to the company’s decision to cool its HBM and VRM with liquid, which will feed more heat into the closed system.

Radeon R9 Fury X Thermals over Time vs. 980 Ti over Time

Again, we’re using dT over A for these charts. The thermals shown are over time, providing greater insight to the burn-in time and time required to meet equilibrium for each solution. We only recently started producing these charts, so everything featured is from the Hybrid review. The reference 980 Ti is also shown at clock-for-clock (C4C) ratings against the Hybrid.

AMD’s R9 Fury X takes a little longer to warm-up, meaning it’s cooling less aggressively during the first few minutes, but continues gaining temperatures throughout the test. Part of this is probably tied to warming of the memory and VRM. Thermals equalize toward the 16-minute mark (1000s). This isn’t inherently bad – it just means the cooler doesn’t attack thermals as powerfully as the nVidia solution, which should help with noise control.

R9 Fury X Pump Frequency & Noise Levels

This was discussed more heavily in our separate frequency spectrum analysis article, and we’ll leave the in-depth test methodology and analysis over there. The short of this topic is as follows:

  • AMD has acknowledged a high-pitched whine output from the pump of its R9 Fury X CLCs.

  • AMD has done everything short of a recall, promising an immediate resolution for the next batches of retail cards. Our retail cards did not have the fix.

  • We do not think the high-frequency output is a viable reason to withhold purchase, though other elements (discussed later) could be. The frequency is irritating, but mostly inaudible in a case.

The below charts show our findings:

 

 

As seen here, the EVGA Hybrid CLC emits a similarly audible whine, but is of a deeper nature. AMD’s whine pierces the 20KHz range, which becomes separately audible over other PC noise emissions. Both have a similar dB level, and AMD actually has a slight dB advantage, but the less spiky nVidia frequencies are less noticeable given the more “camouflaged” spectrum.

AMD R9 Fury X Power Draw

Note: We use a Z97 platform for power draw and thermal testing, but an X99 platform for game FPS testing.

Our power draw analysis is defined in the methodology section. The below chart shows peak system power draw (averaged at equilibrium to eliminate outliers) when under a gaming load.

The Fury X still runs hotter than its direct competition – 379W for the Fury X vs. 353.5W for the 980 Ti (peak system load) – but is measurably better than previous AMD attempts. CrossFire Fury X cards requires a massive 663W when loaded with real-world applications, making for the hottest configuration on our chart. The SLI 980 Ti cards require a still-immense ~589W, though stand low enough to require a slightly smaller PSU.

« Prev Next »

more memory bandwidth?
512GB/s vs 192.2GB/s

  • 3904bit wider memory bus?
    4096bit vs 192bit
  • 2304 more stream processors?
    3584 vs 1280
  • 4500million more transistors?
    8900 million vs 4400 million
  • 144 more texture units (TMUs)?
    224 vs 80
  • 0.8 newer version of OpenCL?
    2 vs 1.2

    • Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 better than AMD Radeon R9 Fury?

    • GPU frequency 506MHz higher?
      1506MHz vs 1000MHz
    • 8.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      72.3 GPixel/s vs 64 GPixel/s
    • 155W below TDP?
      120W vs 275W
    • 1502MHz faster memory speed?
      2002MHz vs 500MHz
    • 7008MHz higher effective clock speed?
      8008MHz vs 1000MHz
    • 1. 5x more VRAM?
      6GB vs 4GB
    • Supports ray tracing?
    • Smaller 12nm semiconductors?
      16nm vs 28nm

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    AMD Radeon R9Fury

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 580

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 580

    AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    vs

    Asus R9 Nano

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 590

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 30003 Radeon R4 AMD

    LaptopFury

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 290X

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    AMD Radeon 90 Rx 570Fury

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 470

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop

    AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    vs

    Asus Radeon RX 550

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    vs

    Manli GeForce GTX 16500133 Functions

    The price ratio

    reviews is not

    7. 3 /10

    3 Votes

    reviews yet

    7.0 /10 9000

    3 VOTES

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

    Reviews are not yet

    7.0 /10

    3 Votes

    Fan noise

    reviews yet not

    7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 /10

    3 Votes

    Reliability

    Reviews not yet

    7.0 /10

    3 VOTES

    1. TACT Frequency GP

    1000MHZ

    1506MHz

    9000 ) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9 Fury)

    1708MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    64 GPixel/s

    72.3 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4. flops

    7.17 TFLOPS

    3.85 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    224 GTexels/s

    120.5 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    500MHz

    2002MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    1000MHz

    8008MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    512GB/s

    192.2GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    4096bit

    192bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5. GDDR memory versions

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9 Fury)

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improves performance.

    6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

    ✖AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU temperature at boot

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9 Fury)

    Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9Fury)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔AMD Radeon R9 Fury

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI version 3

    HDMI 1.4

    HDMI 2.0

    Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    GPU memory frequency

    This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

    2002MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    500MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326. 6 MHz

    FLOPS

    A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

    3.79TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    7.4TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    Turbo GPU

    If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
    Show all

    1708 MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    Texture size

    A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
    Show all

    120.5 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    224 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    Architecture name

    Pascal

    GCN 3.0

    Graphic processor name

    GP106

    Fiji

    Demeded Memory

    from which the device stores or reads information.

    192.2GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    512GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    Effective memory speed

    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
    Show all

    8008 MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    1000MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    RAM

    6 GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    4 GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    GDDR Memory Versions

    Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
    Show all

    5

    Average: 4. 5

    Average: 4.5

    Memory bus width

    A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
    Show all

    192bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    4096bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    Heat dissipation (TDP)

    Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
    Show all

    120W

    Average: 140.4W

    275W

    Average: 140. 4W

    Process

    The small size of semiconductors means that this is a new generation chip.

    16 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    Number of transistors

    The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

    4400 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    8900 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    PCIe version

    Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
    Show all

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    Width

    250mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    191mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    Height

    111.2mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    DirectX

    Used in demanding games for enhanced graphics

    12

    max 12. 2

    Average: 11.1

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    OpenCL version

    Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
    Show all

    1.2

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    2

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    opengl version

    Later versions provide better game graphics

    4.5

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    4.6

    max 4. 6

    Average: 4

    Shader model version

    6.4

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    6.3

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    version VULKAN

    1.2

    1.2

    version CUDA

    6.1

    No data

    HDMI Output

    9000 They can transmit video and audio to the display.
    Full display

    Yes

    Yes

    DisplayPort

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

    3

    Average: 2

    3

    Average: 2

    DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI

    one

    Mean: 1. 4

    Mean: 1.4

    Number of HDMI connectors

    The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
    Show all

    one

    Average: 1.1

    one

    Average: 1.1

    HDMI

    Yes

    Yes

    Passmark score

    10047

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    9480

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

    74947

    max 1

    Average: 80042. 3

    78830

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    10818

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    22913

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

    12560

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    14288

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU score

    16942

    max 57937

    Average: 18799. 9

    17192

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    3DMark Vantage Performance Score

    42843

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    41198

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

    230475

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    max 533357

    Average: 372425.7

    Unigine Heaven 3.0 test score

    8909

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks

    45

    max 202

    Average: 62. 4

    max 202

    Average: 62.4

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03

    45

    max 202

    Average: 64

    max 202

    Average: 64

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Siemens NX

    6

    max 212

    Average: 14

    max 212

    Average: 14

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01

    63

    max 232

    Average: 121.3

    max 232

    Average: 121.3

    SPECviewperf 12 score — Showcase

    63

    max 175

    Average: 108. 4

    max 175

    Average: 108.4

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical

    31

    max 107

    Average: 39.6

    max 107

    Average: 39.6

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01

    31

    max 107

    Average: 39

    max 107

    Average: 39

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya

    101

    max 177

    Average: 129.8

    max 177

    Average: 129.8

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04

    101

    max 180

    Average: 132. 8

    max 180

    Average: 132.8

    SPECviewperf 12 — Energy score

    6

    max 25

    Average: 9.7

    max 25

    Average: 9.7

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01

    6

    max 21

    Average: 10.7

    max 21

    Average: 10.7

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — Creo

    34

    max 153

    Average: 49.5

    max 153

    Average: 49.5

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01

    34

    max 153

    Average: 52. 5

    max 153

    Average: 52.5

    SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04

    fifty

    max 189

    Average: 91.5

    max 189

    Average: 91.5

    SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia

    fifty

    max 189

    Average: 88.6

    max 189

    Average: 88.6

    Agony — final system requirements for demonic horror announced

    Platforms:

    PS4
    ONE
    PC

    Categories:

    Interesting
    Industry
    Updates

    Tags:

    Agony
    Madmind Studio

    Source

    Games in material

    • Comments
    • Forum

    • Midnight Club Los Angeles

      04. 10.2022 07:48 from
      dozensnake

    • Anime (Japanese animation)

      04.10.2022 07:34 from
      water

    • Xbox Series X [Xbox Scarlett]

      04.10.2022 07:28 from
      JonBonjovy

    • Final Fantasy XIV

      04.10.2022 06:59from
      LimeNox

    • Best series

      04.10.2022 06:43 from
      mokujin

    Formed by the former developers of Tom Clancy’s The Division and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt , the Polish team Madmind Studio has published the final system requirements for the PC version of their debut game, demonic horror Agony , which tells about the attempt of the soul of a dead person to get out of hell.

    Minimum configuration for low settings at 30 fps:

    • Processor: Intel Core i3 at 3.20 GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 955 at 3.2 GHz
    • RAM: 8 GB
    • Hard disk: 17 GB
    • Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2 GB or Radeon R9 280
    • DirectX 11 compatible
    • OS: 64-bit Windows 7, 8 or 10

    Recommended configuration for ultra-high settings at 60 fps:

    • Processor: Intel Core i5-8400 or AMD Ryzen 5 1600
    • RAM: 16 GB
    • Hard disk: 17 GB
    • Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB or Radeon RX 580
    • DirectX 11 compatible
    • OS: 64-bit Windows 7, 8 or 10

    On all announced platforms Agony will appear on March 30th.

    See also : State of Decay 2 gets a 4K singleplayer demo .

    Subscribe to our Telegram channel, where we publish what does not fall into the news feed, and follow us online:

    Telegram channel

    Google News

    Yandex
    News

    Yandex Zen

    Latest news

    • 03. 10.2022
      The owner of items from the Google Stadia booth put them up for auction

    • 03.10.2022
      Valve Partner: Over 1 Million Steam Deck Units Sold

    • 03.10.2022
      Insiders: Tilda Swinton and Peter Stormare may return in the sequel to the film «Constantine»

    • 03.10.2022
      Fandom acquires GameSpot, Metacritic, GameFAQs and other gaming resources

    • 03.