GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super Graphics cards Comparison
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 Super. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 Super. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Check Price
GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 175 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 42% more power consumption, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce RTX 2060 Super — with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is 11 MHz higher, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super.
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce RTX 2060 Super — by 12 nm process technology.
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super is 219 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce RTX 2060 Super is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 3% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
high / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
low / 720p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 1080p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 Super have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 Super have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 Super have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 Super have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 3% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
high / 1080p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 270−280 | 260−270 |
medium / 1080p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
high / 1080p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
low / 720p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
medium / 1080p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
high / 1080p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 Super have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 1080p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
low / 768p | 290−300 | 280−290 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
high / 1080p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. | ||
low / 768p | 350−400 | 280−290 |
ultra / 1080p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in World of Tanks is 28% more, than GeForce RTX 2060 Super. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
Code name | GP102 | Turing TU106 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 28 February 2017 | 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2176 |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 1470 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1600 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 10,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 354. 4 | 224.4 |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Length | 10.5″ (26.7 cm) | 229 mm |
Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | + |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1. 2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.76 kh/s | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 1427 Mh/s | |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 4.6 Gh/s | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 35 Mh/s | |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 630 Sol/s | |
GPU Boost | 3.0 | |
Siacoin / SC (Sia) | 2.96 Gh/s | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2080
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI mobile
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GeForce RTX 2080
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI mobile
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Quadro P3000 mobile
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Quadro P3000 mobile
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super: What is the difference?
62points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
73points
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Comparison winner
vs
54 facts in comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super?
- 3. 42 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
10.6 TFLOPSvs7.18 TFLOPS - 24.6 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
130.2 GPixel/svs105.6 GPixel/s - 107.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
332 GTexels/svs224.4 GTexels/s - 37.5% more VRAM?
11GBvs8GB - 36GB/s more memory bandwidth?
484GB/svs448GB/s - 96bit wider memory bus width?
352bitvs256bit - 1408 more shading units?
3584vs2176 - 1200million more transistors?
12000 millionvs10800 million
Why is Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti?
- 45W lower TDP?
175Wvs220W - 374MHz faster memory clock speed?
1750MHzvs1376MHz - 2992MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
14000MHzvs11008MHz - Supports ray tracing?
- 4nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs16nm - 1 higher version of GDDR memory?
6vs5 - Supports DLSS?
- 1 more DVI outputs?
1vs0
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Asus Turbo GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual OC 12GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
1 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
1 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
10.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
9.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Fan noise
10.0/10
1 votes
7.0/10
1 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1480MHz
1470MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1582MHz
1650MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3. pixel rate
130.2 GPixel/s
105.6 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
10.6 TFLOPS
7.18 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
332 GTexels/s
224.4 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1376MHz
1750MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
11008MHz
14000MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
484GB/s
448GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
352bit
256bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
RTX 2060 SUPER VS GTX 1080 Ti — WHICH ONE WORTH BUYING? • Epic Game Tech
Table of Contents
What’s up guys welcome back. Today we have quite a few video cards to choose from. And even more exciting ones to come. But is the newest always the best one for your pocket?
Well, today I will be benchmarking and comparing two $400 us dollars graphics cards – RTX 2060 Super witch is based on Turing architecture.
As well as a GTX 1080 Ti witch is based on Pascal architecture and it was or even is one of the best video cards released. I will run through 10 games and a few 3DMark benchmarks so you could have a better picture and decide which one suits best for your needs.
Specifications
At first, let’s compare the specifications of both cards. So, I have an RTX 2060 Super Windforce OC 8G from a Gigabyte. It’s quite a basic two fan model with a 1680MHz core clock, GDDR6 14000MHz memory and 8GB of VRAM.
As for GTX 1080 Ti, it’s a decent model called GameRock from Palit. It features 1670Mhz core clock and 1708MHz in OC mode. As well as older GDDR5X memory clocked at 11000MHz and 11GB of VRAM.
I’ve tested both of these paired with an i7-9700kf CPU, Z370 motherboard, and 32 GB of ram. In case you are curious how RTX 2060 Super performs paired with a Ryzen 5 3600 processor, you can check it in our $1000 Gaming PC Build post.
Benchmarks
All right, enough about specs and lest have a look into benchmarks.
Firstly, we have a 3DMark Fire Strike benchmark. Both cards got quite nice scores, but we have a noticeable difference of around 16% to 1080 Ti favor.
In a more intensive DirectX 12 Time Spy benchmark the difference is smaller, but still, 1080 ti got 11% better score.
Let’s switch to gaming since this is what we are interested in the most.
First up we have Fortnite. And with both cards you can play at 144hz having in mind I’ve used all settings on Epic. Looking at the average frame rate GTX 1080 Ti was 12% faster, but the difference is quite minimal in 1% lows.
And the performance of both GPUs was identical in CSGO. Both of them ensure super high-refresh-rate gameplay and would be capable of handling a 240hz monitor.
Next up we have one more popular battle royale game Apex Legends. GTX 1080 Ti provides a better average and 1% lows frame rate performance getting 12% and 9% more FPS than 2060 super.
But in general, both cards gave really smooth experience, and both of them suitable for a high refresh rate gaming.
League of Legends. With the highest settings in both cases I’ve got over 250 fps on average and over 180 fps as 1% lows.
Another less demanding game Rocket League. And as expected, you can easily game on a 240hz monitor, since we get more FPS than we actually need. But worth noting, comparing the average frame rate, GTX 1080 Ti was 16% faster here.
In GTA V we have a really nice FPS number on both GPUs even when using the highest settings. But 1080 Ti is taking a lead by 14% on average FPS and 20% better performance in 1% lows.
You could bring down a few settings on an RTX 2060 Super in order to achieve stable 144 fps or more, but basically, any of these two are capable of running high refresh rate sessions when gaming.
Let’s have a look at more demanding titles such as Shadow of The Tomb Raider. I’ve got 15% better result in average fps with 1080 Ti, but 1% lows were 12% better on the 2060 Super side.
Nothing to worry about since both video cards performed way above the 60 fps line here.
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is another CPU and GPU-heavy title. On 1080p using Ultra settings both performed well and made it to desired 60 frames. 1% lows were identical, but GTX 1080 Ti gave around 20% better performance in average fps.
Next up we have Hitman 2. And we have barely a few fps difference in performance. So both GPU’s managed to hit over 100 fps on average. Though GTX 1080 Ti was unbeatable in 1% lows territory with 83 fps while 2060 Super managed to hit only 41 fps here.
Far Cry New Dawn is the last title I’ve tested. Similar to Hitman 2, I’ve got over 100 fps on average on both GPUs and both of them performed quite similar. And so we have just a few FPS difference.
10 Games Average
So, it’s time to wrap up our results. And so, on average GTX 1080 Ti was around 9% faster than RTX 2060 Super. On the other hand, 2060 Super managed to get a better FPS in a few older titles, but in general, it got outperformed by GTX 1080 Ti, at least in games I’ve tested.
Well, RTX 2060 Super might have better drivers support for upcoming new games and so the difference might shrink in upcoming years. As-well you would get a warranty when buying this new card.
But on the other hand, GTX 1080 Ti is still a hell of a beast, managed to provide a better gaming experience and having in mind it has more VRAM, it will stay for a while among the best performing graphics cards for sure.
As always, you will find links to both GPUs in the description below.
So, the main pros and cons of both of these cards.
Pros & Cons
RTX 2060 Super – Pros
- New card warranty
- Possibly better drivers support
- Dedicated cores for ray tracing acceleration
RTX 2060 Super – Cons
- 9% lower gaming performance compared to GTX 1080 Ti @ 1080p
- 3GB less VRAM (8GB vs 11 GB)
GTX 1080 Ti – Pros
- 9 % better gaming performance out of 10 games tested. (Actually, 12% faster if we remove CSGO and League of Legends from the equation)
- 11 GB of VRAM (versus 8 GB of VRAM on 2060 Super)
GTX 1080 Ti – Cons
- The used video cards have no warranty
- More power draw than 2060 Super (so you might need a better power supply)
So after RTX 2060 Super VS GTX 1080 Ti battle, it’s up to you to decide which one to choose for your gaming rig. And I hope I managed to provide valuable insights and benchmarks in order to make it easier for you.
So what you think of these two graphics cards? Which one would you choose?
Also, in case you have any doubts or have any questions just leave your comments below and I will get back to you guys.
Thank you so much for stopping by and if you enjoyed this article, do not forget to visit our YouTube channel and subscribe since you will be able to stay updated on new upcoming PC Builds and PC component reviews.
And see you soon.
Links to Amazon
RTX 2060 Super (Gigabyte) – https://geni.us/t5okVQA
RTX 3060 (EVGA) – https://geni.us/BxXfP15
Disclosure: EpicGameTech gets a small commission when you purchase something via our Amazon links. It doesn’t cost you anything extra since that comes from Amazon’s end. So, please be aware, the links provided to Amazon are affiliate links.
GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
60 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti . |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
13% higher gaming performance. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (66 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | TU106 (TU106-410-A1) | vs | GP102 (GP102-350-K1-A1) | |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 16 nm | |
Die Size | 445 mm² | vs | 471 mm² | |
Transistors | 10,800 million | vs | 12,000 million | |
Shaders | 2176 | vs | 3584 | |
Compute Units | 34 | vs | 28 | |
Core clock | 1470 MHz | vs | 1480 MHz | |
ROPs | 64 | vs | 88 | |
TMUs | 136 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5X | |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 352 bit | |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
vs | 1376 MHz 11008 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 11264 Mb |
Additional details
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 160 watts | vs | 220 watts | |
Release Date | 9 Jul 2019 | vs | UNRELEASED |
GigaPixels — higher is better
GigaTexels — higher is better
GB/s — higher is better
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | Radeon RX 5700 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
VS | ||
GeForce RTX 2080 Super | TITAN V |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
RTX 2060 Super vs GTX 1080Ti ⚙️
0x1011.998MH/s195W0.062MH/W
Allium12.373MH/s216W0.057MH/W
Argon2d-dyn224.874KH/s231W0.973KH/W
Argon2d250912.077KH/s275W3.317KH/W
Argon2d409640.697KH/s250W0.163KH/W
Astralhash15.441MH/s173W0.089MH/W
Autolykos291.047MH/s177W0.514MH/W
BCD33.827MH/s198W0.171MH/W
BMW5121513.796MH/s132W11.468MH/W
BeamHashII36. 97H/s273W0.135H/W
BeamHashIII25.78H/s176W0.146H/W
Blake (14r)1.841GH/s113W0.016GH/W
Blake (2b)1.769GH/s133W0.013GH/W
Blake (2b-BTCC)1700.985MH/s130W13.085MH/W
Blake (2s)5.098GH/s283W0.018GH/W
Blake (2s-Kadena)1.229GH/s206W0.006GH/W
C1141.141MH/s192W0.214MH/W
CNReverseWaltz996.15H/s160W6.226H/W
Chukwa91.032KH/s247W0. 369KH/W
Chukwa232.403KH/s247W0.131KH/W
ChukwaWRKZ130.553KH/s245W0.533KH/W
Cortex0.07H/s134W0.001H/W
CryptoNight0.873KH/s102W0.009KH/W
CryptoNightAlloy403.66H/s129W3.129H/W
CryptoNightArto690.928H/s189W3.656H/W
CryptoNightConceal1764.467H/s142W12.426H/W
CryptoNightFast1670.22H/s166W10.062H/W
CryptoNightGPU2310H/s177W13.051H/W
CryptoNightHaven1053. 5H/s139W7.579H/W
CryptoNightHeavy1055.25H/s171W6.171H/W
CryptoNightHeavyX405.097H/s147W2.756H/W
CryptoNightLiteV71.89KH/s125W0.015KH/W
CryptoNightR882.7H/s171W5.162H/W
CryptoNightSaber1011.72H/s181W5.59H/W
CryptoNightStelliteV4888.715H/s145W6.129H/W
CryptoNightStelliteV51354.338H/s148W9.151H/W
CryptoNightTalleo0.008MH/s133W0MH/W
CryptoNightTurtle7.466KH/s152W0. 049KH/W
CryptoNightUPX230.26KH/s140W0.216KH/W
CryptoNightV70.907KH/s133W0.007KH/W
CryptoNightV8880.06H/s162W5.432H/W
CryptoNightWOW875.67H/s—W—H/W
CryptoNightZLS1150.7H/s152W7.57H/W
Cuckaroo29S7.307H/s159W0.046H/W
Cuckaroo29b4.803H/s200W0.024H/W
CuckooBFC176.71H/s189W0.935H/W
CuckooCycle7.85H/s195W0.04H/W
Darkcoin2.143GH/s250W0. 009GH/W
Dedal10.259MH/s227W0.045MH/W
Eaglesong0.836GH/s129W0.006GH/W
Equihash0.697KH/s241W0.003KH/W
Equihash(125,4)52.04H/s234W0.222H/W
Equihash(144,5)71.5H/s251W0.285H/W
Equihash(150,5)38.12H/s244W0.156H/W
Equihash(192,7)39H/s226W0.173H/W
Equihash(210,9)326H/s243W1.342H/W
Equihash(96,5)28.685KH/s249W0.115KH/W
Equihash+Scrypt35. 696KH/s253W0.141KH/W
EquihashBTCZ70.5H/s185W0.381H/W
EquihashBTG72H/s240W0.3H/W
EquihashSAFE72H/s248W0.29H/W
EquihashZEL72H/s192W0.375H/W
Etchash50.676MH/s224W0.226MH/W
Ethash45.676MH/s210W0.218MH/W
FiroPoW24.812MH/s191W0.13MH/W
Globalhash38.283MH/s156W0.245MH/W
Groestl0.055GH/s118W0GH/W
HMQ17256. 189MH/s201W0.031MH/W
Handshake0.405GH/s209W0.002GH/W
HeavyHash457.16MH/s194W2.356MH/W
Hex20.304MH/s174W0.117MH/W
HoneyComb0.524MH/s71W0.007MH/W
Jeonghash7.625MH/s154W0.05MH/W
KAWPOW22.131MH/s278W0.08MH/W
Keccak1.266GH/s250W0.005GH/W
Keccak-C1.274GH/s253W0.005GH/W
LBRY0.427GH/s157W0.003GH/W
Lyra2REv259. 399MH/s200W0.297MH/W
Lyra2REv356.67MH/s179W0.317MH/W
Lyra2vc0ban52.738MH/s211W0.25MH/W
Lyra2z3.733MH/s119W0.031MH/W
MTP4.061MH/s216W0.019MH/W
Myr-Groestl0.062GH/s71W0.001GH/W
NIST50.055GH/s191W0GH/W
NeoScrypt1.502MH/s247W0.006MH/W
Octopus14.286MH/s191W0.075MH/W
PHI161244.63MH/s261W0.171MH/W
PHI210. 529MH/s196W0.054MH/W
Padihash0.262MH/s61W0.004MH/W
Pascal0.007GH/s—W—GH/W
Pawelhash7.382MH/s182W0.041MH/W
ProgPow20.832MH/s209W0.1MH/W
ProgPowSERO21.717MH/s184W0.118MH/W
ProgPowZ21.723MH/s280W0.078MH/W
Quark0.023GH/s154W0GH/W
Qubit0.021GH/s172W0GH/W
RandomKEVA828.1H/s151W5.484H/W
RandomSFX822. 936H/s174W4.73H/W
RandomX936.467H/s197W4.754H/W
SHA-256csm350.665MH/s70W5.009MH/W
ScryptSIPC799.7KH/s150W5.331KH/W
Skein0.88GH/s207W0.004GH/W
Skein2525.467MH/s255W2.061MH/W
Skunkhash57.359MH/s125W0.459MH/W
SonoA1.813MH/s247W0.007MH/W
Tellor0GH/s187W0GH/W
Tensority0.005KH/s182W0KH/W
TimeTravel1042. 909MH/s274W0.157MH/W
Tribus137.467MH/s211W0.652MH/W
Ubqhash41.428MH/s191W0.217MH/W
X11k1.994MH/s170W0.012MH/W
X1311.373MH/s172W0.066MH/W
X1511.279MH/s241W0.047MH/W
X16R18.348MH/s256W0.072MH/W
X16RT38.929MH/s184W0.212MH/W
X16RTVEIL11.15MH/s209W0.053MH/W
X16Rv234.226MH/s188W0.182MH/W
X16S31. 337MH/s170W0.184MH/W
X1727.516MH/s243W0.113MH/W
X17R10.129MH/s186W0.054MH/W
X180.262MH/s79W0.003MH/W
X21S20.885MH/s178W0.117MH/W
X22i16.772MH/s187W0.09MH/W
X25X6.911MH/s250W0.028MH/W
X3317.124MH/s271W0.063MH/W
Xevan5.499MH/s242W0.023MH/W
Zhash75.667H/s212W0.357H/W
bitcash7.614MH/s152W0. 05MH/W
cuckARoo24201.66H/s298W0.677H/W
cuckARoo297.534H/s178W0.042H/W
cuckARood294.85H/s252W0.019H/W
cuckARoom294.2H/s217W0.019H/W
cuckARooz294.55H/s201W0.023H/W
cuckAToo311.405H/s160W0.009H/W
cuckAToo320.546H/s180W0.003H/W
cuckoo7.67MH/s220W0.035MH/W
vProgPow10.385MH/s249W0.042MH/W
How Does the GTX 1080 Ti Stack Up in 2020?
Today we’re taking a look back at the mighty GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, the previous-gen Nvidia flagship that has become somewhat of an iconic GPU, and for good reason. We were impressed with what Nvidia managed to achieve at the time, and while cost per frame wasn’t great — a given with high-end flagships — the 1080 Ti was designed to enable a level of performance never seen before and it accomplished just that.
Compared to AMD’s flagship at the time, the Radeon R9 Fury X, the GTX 1080 Ti was an incredible 60% faster at 4K and up to 30% faster than the original GTX 1080. This level of performance was made possible by a staggering 3584 CUDA cores, 17% more than the previous generation’s Titan part, that were also clocked almost 50% higher.
For roughly 18 months the GTX 1080 Ti was the most powerful GeForce GPU on the market, but the fondness high-end gamers seemed to have for this GPU was only magnified when Nvidia showed it the door with the GeForce RTX 20 series.
These days we may have digested the GeForce RTX series as the top offering in Nvidia’s lineup, but when the RTX 2080 launched in late 2018, it did so at the same $700 price point as the GTX 1080 Ti while offering no real performance advantage. You may not recall this, but Nvidia also made the Founders Edition version the only you could buy initially for an extra $100. Ray tracing and DLSS made their debut as promising technology that you couldn’t use.
By that point the GTX 1080 Ti was being sold for about $600, so even at the base MSRP, gamers were asked to dish out at least 20% more money for an RTX 2080 and there was no evidence that you were getting anything for that extra investment. This had many prospective buyers actively hunting the remaining discounted GTX 1080 Ti stock, and once that dried up, the used market became a popular target. For a while you could see people selling their GTX 1080 Ti’s for as little as $400, which in hindsight was a steal at the time.
Even today, over three years after release, the GTX 1080 Ti is going for about $500 on the second-hand market. The inevitable question thus is, how does the old Pascal GPU compare to modern $400 — $500 GPUs? That’s exaclty what we’re going to find out with a comprehensive 35 game benchmark.
As usual, all testing has been conducted using our Core i9-9900K GPU test system clocked at 5 GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 memory. We’re covering 1080p and 1440p resolutions in over thirty titles with the respective performance breakdowns after discussing some of the more interesting game results.
Benchmark Time
First up we have Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and despite using DirectX 12, the GTX 1080 Ti is still able to get the better of the RTX 2070 Super and 5700 XT, though it has to be said performance is comparable. As an unfortunate side note, we had some issues completing testing with the RTX 2080, however the 2070 Super and RTX 2080 are fairly evenly matched, not quite as similar as the RTX 2060 Super and RTX 2070, but there’s really not much more in it.
All in all, the old 1080 Ti is killing it here with high refresh rate performance at 1440p.
Ghost Recon Breakpoint at 1440p sees the GTX 1080 Ti and 2070 Super very evenly matched. This is also what you’d typically expect to see given the 2070 Super is similar to an RTX 2080.
We had expected the 1080 Ti to drop off with this newer Vulkan implementation, but it seems Nvidia has optimized the Pascal GPU properly here. Again, a strong result for the aging flagship GPU.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider was released just before the Turing GPUs, so it’s still well optimized for Pascal. The GTX 1080 Ti delivers comparable performance to the RTX 2070 Super and this time also the 5700 XT. Using the highest in-game quality settings you’re looking at well over 60 fps at all times when gaming at 1440p.
The Gears 5 results are interesting as we see a situation where the GTX 1080 Ti and its many more cores is able to comfortably beat the RTX 2070 Super. Here we’re looking at a 14% performance boost at 1440p, taking us from 80 fps to just over 90 fps.
Control has been heavily optimized for the Turing architecture (it’s one of the few ray traced/DLSS titles available) and as a result the GTX 1080 Ti suffers only delivering comparable performance to that of the RTX 2070 and 5700 XT. It’s hardly poor performance, but with some optimization work the GTX 1080 Ti could certainly do better here.
The GTX 1080 Ti does very well in Metro Exodus, beating the RTX 2070 Super by a convincing 10% margin. This also placed it ahead of the 5700 XT which does well in this title with HairWorks disabled. Impressively at 1440p we’re looking at over 90 fps at all times in our benchmark pass, so great stuff from the 1080 Ti.
Resident Evil 3 is another game where the GTX 1080 Ti does well, delivering well over 90 fps at all times to beat the 2070 Super by a 9% margin and the 5700 XT by a 17% margin. This really is excellent performance at 1440p in one of the newest titles we have.
Next up we have Doom Eternal and this is a good example of Nvidia prioritizing the Turing architecture. Even so the GTX 1080 Ti hardly makes out poorly with an average of 126 fps at 1440p and while that meant it was 13% slower than the 2070 Super, it was still 6% faster than the 5700 XT.
Playing Fortnite with the new DX12 mode sees the GTX 1080 Ti deliver comparable performance to that of the 2070 Super, so just over 100 fps on average at 1440p. This is excellent performance and with competitive esports quality settings you’ll see frame rates far exceed the refresh rate of high speed panels.
Now this is an interesting set of results, testing with PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds sees the GTX 1080 Ti beat the 2070 Super by a 12% margin, pushing up over 140 fps. The Pascal flagship was a whopping 36% faster than the 5700 XT, though it has to be said PUBG isn’t a particularly AMD friendly title.
Not unlike what we just saw in PUBG and even earlier Gears 5, the 1080 Ti is notably faster than the 2070 Super in Borderlands 3, particularly at 1440p when comparing 1% low data. The GTX 1080 Ti is on par with the 5700 XT which performs really well in this title.
Battlefield V using the DX12 API we have the GTX 1080 Ti matching the performance output of the 5700 XT and 2070 Super. That’s solid performance at 1440p given we’re looking at over 100 fps on average.
Performance Summary
As you might have expected, the GTX 1080 Ti is still a bit of a beast, even by today’s standards. Based on that dozen game sample it looked very competitive with the RTX 2070 Super and a little faster than the 5700 XT, but before we close the book on the benchmarks, let’s take a look at the 35 game breakdown.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs. GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Well, it’s very competitive with the RTX 2070 Super indeed. Overcoming it by a small 2% margin overall… as always anything under 5% we deem a draw. It’s interesting to see where the core heavy Pascal GPU shines such as World of Tanks, Gears 5, PUBG, War Thunder, and so on.
It’s also interesting to see which games are optimized for Turing such as Control, Doom Eternal, Apex Legends, Rainbow Six Siege, Youngblood and Strange Brigade. For the most part though, when the GTX 1080 Ti was slower, it wasn’t a great deal slower.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs. Radeon RX 5700 XT
Moving on to the breakdown with the Radeon RX 5700 XT, overall the GTX 1080 Ti was 11% faster at 1440p. That’s not a dramatic difference but it’s starting to get up there and we do see gains of almost 40% in some titles. If you look at this comparison from the perspective of old $700 GPU vs. new $400 GPU, that’s not a bad look for AMD. But for those shopping second-hand, you can see why the GTX 1080 Ti is still a compelling option.
Great Old Timer
Undoubtedly the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti still looks to be a very solid GPU in 2020, offering very similar performance to the RTX 2070 Super. In other words, it’s up there competing with a new GPU with a $500 asking price. That’s about 30% cheaper than where it started, so a depreciation rate of 10% per year.
But that still doesn’t make it a good buy today. What would you expect to pay for a 3 year old graphics card that delivers comparable performance to a modern $500 GPU, or about 10% more performance than a $400 model? Assuming you only have eyes for the green team, we’d say at least a $100 discount is in order for shopping second-hand. Ideally you’d want it $150 off, putting the GTX 1080 Ti at $350 and we have seen some go for that price in the past.
However, having recently put together a massive 80 GPU used buying guide, we were surprised to find the average selling price of used GTX 1080 Ti’s at $475. Bizarrely, people are spending over $500 on used GTX 1080 Ti cards on eBay and in rather large volumes. It makes no sense to purchase a 1080 Ti at that kind of price, of course. A new RTX 2070 Super for $500 is better, or you can save some money and get a well cooled Radeon RX 5700 XT that is only marginally slower.
Our two-pronged conclusion is that current owners of the GTX 1080 Ti can rejoice, especially if you’ve had yours for a long time, it’s still an amazing GPU that you won’t have to replace unless high refresh 4K gaming is what you’re strictly after. For prospective buyers, second-hand GTX 1080 Ti’s are hard pass at anything over $350 considering that in the near future more Turing optimized games like Doom Eternal and Control won’t run as smoothly on Pascal. We suspect with the next-gen Nvidia GPUs not that far away, Pascal could age quite noticeably over the next year.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
- Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon
- GeForce RTX 2080 Super on Amazon
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950X on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 9 3700X on Amazon
0026
1750MHz vs 1376MHz
14000MHz vs 11008MHz
69°C vs 84°C
12nm vs 16nm
6 vs 5
Why is Zotac GTX 1080 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super?
- 4. 16 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
11.34 TFLOPS vs 7.18 TFLOPS - 33.6 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? higher number of textured pixels?
354.4 GTexels/s vs 224.4 GTexels/s - 37.5% more VRAM?
11GB vs 8GB - 36.4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
484.4GB/s vs 448GB/s - 96bit wider memory bus?
352bit vs 256bit - 1408 more stream processors?
3584 vs 2176 - 1200million more transistors?
12000 million vs 10800 million
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Zotac GTX
3
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Asus Turbo GeForce RTX 2060
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
90 Radeon RX 90 XT6 vs
0003
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
0003
ZOTAC GTX 1080 TI
0 Reviews of Users
ZotAC GTX 1080 TI
0. 0.0260 /10
0 Reviews of Users
Functions
Refract
9000 3
reviews are not yet
Games
10.0 /10
1 Votes
reviews yet not
performance
10.0 9.0 9.0 /10
1 Votes
reviews not yet
RIGHT FAN
7.0 /10
1 VOTES
Reviews are not
Reliability
10.0 /10 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 VOTS
No reviews yet
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1470MHz
1481MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.turbo GPU
1650MHz
1582MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
105.6 GPixel/s
139. 2 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
7.18 TFLOPS
11.34 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
224.4 GTexels/s
354.4 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1750MHz
1376MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
14000MHz
11008MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
448GB/s
484.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4. memory bus width
256bit
352bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5.versions of GDDR memory
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✖Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.GPU Temperature at Boot
Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✖Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Zotac GTX 1080 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI 3.Version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
Mini DisplayPort 6.outs
Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
Price match
Cancel
Which graphic cards are better?
Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti which is better?
General information | |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
0.76023392%
0.51130688% (205.4%) better than |
0.248 |
Architecture |
|
Turing | Pascal |
Codename |
|
TU106 | GP102 |
Type |
|
Desktop | Desktop |
Release price |
|
$399
-300 $ (-42.9%) better than |
$699 |
Number of shaders |
|
2176 | 3584
1408 (64.7%) better than |
Core clock |
|
1470 MHz | 1481 MHz
11 MHz (0.7%) better than |
Boost frequency |
|
1650 MHz
At 68 MHz (4. 3%) better than |
1582 MHz |
Number of transistors |
|
10.800 million | 11.800 million |
Process |
|
12 nm
-4 nm (-25%) better than |
16 nm |
Interface |
|
PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
175W
-75 W (-30%) better than |
250 W |
Length |
|
229 mm | 26.7 cm |
Additional power connectors |
|
1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
G-SYNC 9 support0003 NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
Multi Monitor |
|
+ | n/a |
SLI support |
|
n/a | + |
3D Vision |
|
n/a | + |
GPU Boost |
|
n/a | + |
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies. |
|
+ | n/a |
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
+ | + |
CUDA The presence of the CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
Maximum temperature |
|
n/a | 91 °C |
Recommended power supply |
|
n/a | 600 Watt |
Multi-monitor support |
|
n/a | 1 |
Ansel |
|
Virtual Reality |
|
n/a | + |
Decred / DCR (Decred) |
|
n/a | 4.6 Gh/s |
Siacoin / SC (Sia) |
|
n/a | 2.96 Gh/s |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) |
|
n/a | 1 Sol/s |
Video connectors |
|
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DirectX |
|
12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Floating point performance |
|
n/a | 11. 340 gflops |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
n/a | 35 Mh/s |
Memory | |
Memory type |
|
GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
8GB | 11 GB
3 GB (37.5%) better than |
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
256 bit | 352 bit
96 bits (37.5%) better than |
Shared memory |
|
— | — |
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
14000 MHz
At 2992 MHz (27.2%) better than |
11008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM the PC can use. |
|
448 | 484.4
36.4 (8.1%) better than |
ASUS |
|||||
DG1-4G | DG1-4G | DG1-4G | 2048Mb LPDDR4X | PCI-E 3.0 x16 (x4) | 22-07-2021 |
GeForce GTX 1050 | CERBERUS-GTX1050-O2G | GeForce GTX 1050 | 2048Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 27-04-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1050 | DUAL-GTX1050-O2G-V2 | GeForce GTX 1050 | 2048Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 16-05-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | CERBERUS-GTX1050TI-A4G | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 4096Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 19-04-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | CERBERUS-GTX1050TI-O4G | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 4096Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 21-05-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | PH-GTX1050TI-4G | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 4096Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 05-09-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | ROG STRIX-GTX1050TI-4G-GAMING | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 4096Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 10-05-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1060 | DUAL-GTX1060-6G | GeForce GTX 1060 | 6144Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 29-05-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1060 | EX-GTX1060-6G | GeForce GTX 1060 | 6144Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 29-08-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1060 | EX-GTX1060-O6G | GeForce GTX 1060 | 6144Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 21-08-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1060 | PH-GTX1060-3G | GeForce GTX 1060 | 3072Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 13-02-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | CERBERUS-GTX1070TI-A8G | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 8192Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 05-06-2018 |
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | TUF-GTX1650S-O4G-GAMING | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 4096Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 11-02-2020 |
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | DUAL-GTX1660S-O6G-EVO | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 11-11-2019 |
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | TUF 3-GTX1660S-O6G-GAMING | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 09-12-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | DUAL-RTX2060-A6G | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 22-04-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | DUAL-RTX2060-O6G | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 19-07-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | PH-RTX2060-6G | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 10-06-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | ROG-STRIX-RTX2060-6G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 12-08-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | ROG-STRIX-RTX2060-O6G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 21-02-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | TUF-RTX2060-O6G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 01-07-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | TURBO-RTX2060-6G | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 29-07-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | ROG-STRIX-RTX2060S-O8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 27-12-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | DUAL-RTX2070-A8G | GeForce RTX 2070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 15-01-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | DUAL-RTX2070-O8G | GeForce RTX 2070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 08-01-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | ROG-STRIX-RTX2070-8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 15-04-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | ROG-STRIX-RTX2070-A8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 18-12-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | ROG-STRIX-RTX2070-O8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 05-11-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | TURBO-RTX2070-8G | GeForce RTX 2070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 16-05-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | DUAL-RTX2080-8G | GeForce RTX 2080 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 21-05-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | DUAL-RTX2080-A8G | GeForce RTX 2080 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 28-12-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | DUAL-RTX2080-O8G | GeForce RTX 2080 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 05-10-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | ROG-STRIX-RTX2080-8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2080 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 05-04-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | ROG-STRIX-RTX2080-O8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2080 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 09-11-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | TURBO-RTX2080-8G | GeForce RTX 2080 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 24-12-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | DUAL-RTX2080TI-11G | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 11264Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 05-08-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | DUAL-RTX2080TI-A11G | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 11264Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 27-03-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | ROG-STRIX-RTX2080TI-A11G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 11264Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 04-06-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | ROG-STRIX-RTX2080TI-O11G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 11264Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 26-10-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | TURBO-RTX2080TI-11G | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 11264Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 03-05-2019 |
GeForce RTX 3060 | ROG-STRIX-RTX3060-O12G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3060 | 12288Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 25-02-2021 |
GeForce RTX 3060 | TUF-RTX3060-012G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3060 | 12288Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 12-04-2021 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TUF-RTX3060TI-O8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 11-02-2021 |
GeForce RTX 3070 | ROG-STRIX-RTX3070-O8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 19-11-2020 |
GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX3070-O8G-NOCTUA | GeForce RTX 3070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 24-02-2022 |
GeForce RTX 3080 | TUF-RTX3080-O10G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3080 | 10240Mb GDDR6X | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 28-10-2020 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | ROG-STRIX-RTX3080Ti-O12G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 12288Mb GDDR6X | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 26-07-2021 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | TUF-RTX3080Ti-O12G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 12288Mb GDDR6X | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 22-06-2021 |
GeForce RTX 3090 | TUF-RTX3090-O24G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3090 | 24576Mb GDDR6X | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 10-11-2020 |
Radeon RX 5500XT | DUAL-RX5500XT-O8G-EVO | Radeon RX 5500 XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 (x8) | 28-04-2020 |
Radeon RX 5500XT | ROG-STRIX-RX5500XT-O8G-GAMING | Radeon RX 5500 XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 (x8) | 22-01-2020 |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | ROG-STRIX-RX5600XT-O6G-GAMING | Radeon RX 5600 XT | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 18-02-2020 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | DUAL-RX5700XT-O8G-EVO | Radeon RX 5700XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 06-08-2020 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | ROG-STRIX-RX5700XT-O8G-GAMING | Radeon RX 5700XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 04-11-2019 |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | DUAL-RX6600XT-O8G | Radeon RX 6600 XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 02-11-2021 |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | ROG-STRIX-RX6600XT-O8G-GAMING | Radeon RX 6600 XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 17-09-2021 |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | ROG-STRIX-RX6700XT-O12G-GAMING | Radeon RX 6700XT | 12288Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 12-07-2021 |
Radeon RX 6800 | TUF-RX6800-O16G-GAMING | Radeon RX 6800 | 16384Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 06-04-2021 |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | TUF-RX6800XT-O16G-GAMING | Radeon RX 6800 XT | 16384Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 24-02-2021 |
Radeon RX Vega 56 | ROG-STRIX-RXVEGA56-O8G-GAMING | Radeon RX Vega 56 | 8192Mb HBM2 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 18-01-2018 |
ROG-STRIX-RTX3050-O8G-GAMING | GeForce RTX 3050 | ROG-STRIX-RTX3050-O8G-GAMING | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 (x8) | 12-08-2022 |
TUF-RX6500XT-O4G-GAMING | Radeon RX 6500 XT | TUF-RX6500XT-O4G-GAMING | 4096 GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 (x4) | 08-04-2022 |
GIGABYTE |
|||||
GeForce GTX 1650 | GV-N1650GAMING OC-4GD | GeForce GTX 1650 | 4096Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 25-06-2019 |
GeForce GTX 1660 | GV-N1660OC-6GD | GeForce GTX 1660 | 6144Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 09-04-2019 |
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GV-N166SGAMING OC-6GD | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 15-11-2019 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GV-N166TWF2OC-6GD | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 20-03-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | GV-N2060GAMINGOC PRO-6GD | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 05-03-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GV-N206SGAMING OC-8GC | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 19-08-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GV-N206SWF2OC-8GD | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 09-09-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | GV-N208SGAMING OC-8GC | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 17-04-2020 |
GeForce RTX 3050 | GV-N3050GAMING OC-8GD | GeForce RTX 3050 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 (x8) | 18-02-2022 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GV-N306TEAGLE OC-8GD | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 15-12-2020 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GV-N306TGAMINGOC PRO-8GD | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 01-12-2020 |
GeForce RTX 3070 | GV-N3070GAMING OC-8GD | GeForce RTX 3070 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 03-11-2020 |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | GV-N307TGAMING OC-8GD | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 8192Mb GDDR6X | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 25-06-2021 |
Radeon RX 5500XT | GV-R55XTGAMING OC-8GD | Radeon RX 5500 XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 (x8) | 19-12-2019 |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | GV-R56XTGAMING OC-6GD | Radeon RX 5600 XT | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 31-01-2020 |
Inno3D |
|||||
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER iChill X3 ULTRA | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 26-02-2020 |
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ICHILL BLACK | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 09-04-2020 |
MSI |
|||||
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X TRIO | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 11264Mb GDDR5X | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 05-01-2018 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS 6G OC | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 01-03-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 11264Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 23-01-2019 |
Radeon RX 570 | Radeon RX 570 MECH 2 8G OC | Radeon RX 570 | 8192Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 15-07-2019 |
Radeon RX 580 | Radeon RX 580 MECH 2 8G OC | Radeon RX 580 | 8192Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 09-08-2018 |
Palit |
|||||
GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 KalmX | GeForce GTX 1650 | 4096Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 01-07-2020 |
GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1650 StormX OC | GeForce GTX 1650 | 4096Mb GDDR5 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 27-04-2019 |
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER StormX OC | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 4096Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 16-12-2019 |
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Gaming Pro OC | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 05-11-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 28-05-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GP OC | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3. 0 x16 | 30-08-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER JS | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 09-07-2019 |
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2080 GR | GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 3.0 x16 | 25-11-2019 |
GeForce RTX 3050 | GeForce RTX 3050 Dual OC | GeForce RTX 3050 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 (x8) | 08-02-2022 |
GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce RTX 3060 StormX | GeForce RTX 3060 | 12288Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 13-12-2021 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock OC | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 12288Mb GDDR6X | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 26-08-2021 |
PowerColor |
|||||
Radeon RX 5500XT | AXRX 5500 XT 8GBD6-DHR/OC | Radeon RX 5500 XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 (x8) | 04-02-2020 |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | AXRX 5600XT 6GBD6-3DHR/OC | Radeon RX 5600 XT | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 25-05-2020 |
Radeon RX 5700 | AXRX 5700 8GBD6-3DHR/OC | Radeon RX 5700 | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 02-10-2019 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | AXRX 5700 XT 8GBD6-3DHE/OC | Radeon RX 5700XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 08-10-2019 |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | AXRX 6700XT 12GBD6-3DHL | Radeon RX 6700XT | 12288Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 01-04-2021 |
Sapphire |
|||||
Radeon RX 5600 XT | PULSE RX 5600XT 6G | Radeon RX 5600 XT | 6144Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4. 0 x16 | 28-01-2020 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | PULSE RX 5700XT 8G | Radeon RX 5700XT | 8192Mb GDDR6 | PCI-E 4.0 x16 | 22-08-2019 |
Overview of the video card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X 8G
After the launch of the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, the video cards of this line immediately found themselves in the optimal gaming configurations, still remaining an excellent solution for such systems. A good balance of features, increased memory and a reasonable price — a suitable set for those who are ready to spend a reasonable amount for comfortable performance even in heavy games. There are more than three dozen different modifications of the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER on the market, there are plenty to choose from. Today we have a review of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X 8G — a model with a very long name and a three-fan cooler, which turned out to be in the top of the popularity of series adapters on hotline.ua. What is so attractive about her?
GIGABYTE offers several modifications of the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER at once. This is the top version of AORUS with a massive three-slot cooling system and an infinite number of video outputs, several GAMING three-fan adapters in versions with black and white protective covers, as well as WINDFORCE starter modifications with a pair of fans.
Since the announcement of the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER line, the Taiwanese manufacturer has modified its adapters, offering various revisions of outwardly similar models, which, however, have certain differences in layout and circuitry. We tested the latest modification of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X 8G (Rev. 2.0).
The video card is equipped with a three-fan cooling system and is also factory overclocked. Instead of the recommended formula of 1470/1650 MHz, the GPU received an average acceleration value of 1710 MHz at a similar base frequency. The adapter is also equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory running at an effective 14,000 MHz.
Zmist
- 1 Design and layout
- 2 In operation
- 3 Overclocking
- 4 Test bench configuration
- 5 performance 1080p and 1440p
- 6 DLSS 2.0
- 7 working moments
Design and layout
As we have already noted, GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 Super Gaming OC 3X 8G, a three -welfare cooler of the Family Family Kuler.
The modification of the cooler in this case has a three-section radiator block, the segments of which are united by four heat pipes. Sufficiently large dimensions of the adapter allow the use of cassettes of aluminum plates with a significant total dissipation area.
To accelerate the transfer of heat from the GPU to the heatsink, the heatpipes are designed to be in direct contact with the GPU die.
The radiator block is blown by three 80mm axial fans with a specific impeller shape to increase airflow.
Another feature that allows, according to the manufacturer, to increase the efficiency of blowing is the Alternate Spinning technology, which involves the rotation of the central fan in the opposite direction, relative to the side ones. The developers claim that in this way it is possible to improve the laminarity of the generated air flows, avoiding the occurrence of local turbulence zones.
The video card has an original PCB 222 mm long. A 6-phase circuit is used for the GPU power stabilizer, two more serve the GDDR6 memory chips. One of the features of the revision 2.0 adapter is that the power elements are placed closer to the interface panel, that is, to the right of the GPU.
Additional cooling is provided for VRM assemblies and all memory chips. The sole plate used for these purposes is also connected to the main radiator unit.
The total length of the GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X 8G graphics card is 280mm. This is not an unnecessarily large adapter, but before buying it is still worth making sure that there is enough free space in the case to install the device. Especially in cases where the system is assembled in an age case with baskets for drives.
The developers made good use of the adapter’s reduced PCB length feature. The free space was occupied by larger aluminum radiator fins, thereby increasing the total dissipation area. At the exit point of the heat pipes from the radiator cassette, traces of soldering can be observed, which improves contact between the elements.
One 8-pin connector is provided for connecting the auxiliary power supply. Considering the declared thermal package of the GeForce RXT 2060 SUPER at 175 W, such a connector is quite enough for the normal mode and even moderate overclocking of the video card. The additional connector and PCI-E x16 slot can provide up to 225W, so there is still some headroom.
The manufacturer recommends using power supplies with a power of 550 W or more for a system with GeForce RXT 2060 SUPER.
The video card has an auxiliary power indicator. If the power cable is not connected, when the PC is turned on, a bright white LED lights up in the area of the 8-pin connector, which you will surely pay attention to. The manufacturer also reports a mode with LED flickering when applying “improper power”, without disclosing details. Let’s assume that we are talking about a significant deviation of the supplied voltage in the presence of problems with the PSU.
In addition to the functional video card, there is also a decorative backlight. The GIGABYTE logo is illuminated on the top edge, which will be well read through the transparent side wall of the case.
RGB Fusion 2.0 is used to control the lighting. The utility allows you to select a specific glow mode. The proposed list is not very large. Sequential color cycle, static backlight, pulsing, single and double flash are available. In addition, you can use the Intelligent mode in which the color marking (green-yellow-red) will depend either on the temperature of the GPU, or on the degree of loading of the GPU, or even on the speed of the fans of the video card cooling system. The last option, perhaps, we are faced with for the first time. Not that it is a function of necessity, but the possibility itself is something new.
The application also allows you to configure the illumination of devices that support the RGB Fusion protocol. In our case, it was possible to change the glow of the memory modules, even taking into account the fact that the motherboard of the test stand was from another vendor. In addition, this did not prevent meticulously adjusting the effects. Any individual LED on each module of the two-channel kit could be accessed.
The reverse side of the video card is covered with an aluminum plate. The metal plate is used as an additional reinforcing structure, as well as protection against mechanical damage. At the same time, there is no contact with the elements on the reverse side of the PCB; it does not take part in their cooling.
The GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X 8G interface panel has four video outputs — three DisplayPort 1.4 and a full-sized HDMI 2.0b. A significant part of the metal plate is occupied by a grill for the output of heated air.
In progress
Video card supports hybrid cooling mode. At rest, the cooling fans stop, and accordingly the adapter itself works silently. We did not expect anything else from a device of this level with similar dimensions.
The efficiency of the heatsink design is enough to keep the GPU temperature at 47-49C. In our case, the measurements were carried out on an open stand at 25C indoors.
Under load, the temperature of the GPU increased up to 70C with a fan speed of ~1800 rpm. Typical values in games were 66-68C and 1400-1600 rpm. According to the given algorithm, the fans start to rotate when the chip warms up to 59C, that is, we have a certain margin to eliminate frequent start / stop cycles, even in poorly ventilated cases.
The noise level during gaming sessions is below average. The video card is definitely not silent, but in a closed case it will not raise questions in this regard.
As you can see in the screenshot, under load the GPU dynamically accelerated up to 1980 MHz.
Overclocking
To configure the video card settings, the manufacturer suggests using the proprietary AORUS Engine application.
The utility allows you to monitor the status and change the key parameters of the adapter. In particular, for the video card in question, Power Limit can be increased to 108%, and the temperature limit can be increased to 88C. The video card also allows you to increase the supply voltage to the GPU by 100 mV.
In the mode of automatic selection of operating parameters, after a 10-minute tuning, the platform offered to additionally increase the operating frequency of the GPU by almost 90 MHz.
During the experiments, the base clock frequency of the chip was increased from 1470 to 1600 MHz, while the average acceleration value increased proportionally — from 1710 MHz to 1840 MHz. Micron memory chips were not very pliable, allowing you to increase the effective frequency to 15,800 (1975) MHz.
After overclocking, the GPU dynamically accelerated up to 2120 MHz, however, in games, the values often varied between 1980-2050 MHz. The figures are not record-breaking, but generally typical for tuned GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER models with original PCB and cooling designs.
Test bench configuration
Processor | Intel Core i7-8700K (6/12; 3.7/4.7 GHz) | Intel, www.intel.com |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS X Hero (Intel Z370) | ASUS, www.asus.ua |
RAM | HyperX Predator RGB DDR4-3600 16 GB (HX436C17PB3AK2/16) | HyperX, www.hyperxgaming.com |
Accumulator | Kingston KC2500 1TB (SKC2500M8/1000G) | Kingston Technology, www.kingston.com |
Power supply | Thermaltake Toughpower Grand TPG-1200M | Thermaltake, www. thermaltakeusa.com |
Monitor | Acer Predator XB271HK (27″, 3840×2160) | Acer, www.acer.ua |
1080p and 1440p performance
We explored the capabilities of the GeForce RXT 2060 SUPER 8 GB in detail during the first acquaintance with the adapters of the line. In fact, the SUPER version is on average 10-15% more productive than the classic GeForce RTX 2060 6 GB model.
Fast modification provides very comfortable fps in 9 resolution modes2737 1920×1080 and high graphics quality settings. Under such conditions, in many games, the graphics card offers noticeably more than 60 fps, allowing owners of monitors with a higher refresh rate to experience the benefits of such a purchase.
If we compare the performance of the GeForce RXT 2060 SUPER with those of the GeForce GTX 1660 6 GB, then, as we can see, at Full HD resolution, the difference in performance ranges from 50 to 75%. That is, we are talking about devices of fundamentally different classes, even without taking into account the additional features of GeForce RTX. For those who are thinking about upgrading Pascal-based mid-range solutions, we recall that the GeForce GTX 1660 is about 20% faster than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which means that the difference in fps when switching from the latter to the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER will be almost twofold.
GeForce RXT 2060 SUPER is not lost when upscaling to 2560×1440 . In such cases, the increased memory capacity to 8 GB with increased bandwidth helps a lot. Of course, the image quality in this mode needs to be selected more carefully, but in many projects, even at the maximum number of frames / s, it remains quite comfortable.
The TU106 SUPER modification often has an advantage over the Radeon RX 5700. Quantitative indicators indicate that the accelerated version of the Radeon RX 5700 XT is more likely to be able to provide slightly more frames per second in a direct comparison in classic scene rendering. However, NVIDIA solutions have additional «arguments of persuasion». Yes, yes, we are talking about hardware blocks for rendering ray tracing and tensor cores for vector calculations.
The transition from being a supported feature in the spec to a very practical option is a bit slower than we’d like, but we’re on the cusp of a big change. Next-generation game consoles, which will soon be introduced, will receive support for ray tracing, which should predetermine the success of hybrid rendering, or at least guarantee increased attention from developers to this technology. NVIDIA is all set to develop its direction in the PC segment. We hope that AMD will also join the process with the release of the next generation of Radeon.
DLSS 2.0
As for tensor cores, they already have applications. In the context of games, this is primarily the implementation of anti-aliasing technology with deep learning algorithms — DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling). Here, artificial intelligence (AI) models are used, for the processing of which tensor cores are needed. NVIDIA has been working on DLSS since 2016. The first generation of the architecture had certain resolution limitations, and the final results in terms of picture quality did not always meet expectations. For the sake of performance, it was often necessary to sacrifice the clarity and detail of the picture.
This year’s release of DLSS 2.0 offers fundamental changes, improving performance, removing resolution limits and allowing you to find a balance between image quality and performance. Using reduced resolution data and motion vectors passed through a convolutional autoencoder, it is possible to restore the image in high resolution and with good detail. Unlike the first generation, DLSS 2.0 does not need to create a deep learning network for each game. A universal solution is applied here, which will facilitate the use of technology.
A new version of DLSS with partial rendering and quality image scaling based on pretrained neural network data is already in use in Control, Deliver Us The Moon, MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries and Wolfenstein: Youngblood. The sensational Death Stranding has recently joined this set. It was in it that we decided to test such possibilities.
The game supports DLSS 2.0, allowing you to use two modes with increased quality (Quality) and increased performance (Performance). The final results are pleasantly surprising. Activating DLSS in any case significantly increases the number of frames / s, allowing even on the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER to get very comfortable fps values for playing in 4K.
At this resolution, when using the DLSS Performance preset, performance increased by 76% — from 46 to 81 fps. At the same time, the clarity of the picture remains at a very good level. If you look closely, you can find minimal simplifications, but in dynamics they are almost indistinguishable. If you use the Quality mode, then the picture quality becomes almost better than the original with TAA anti-aliasing. At the same time, we get a performance increase of 37%, having more than 60 frames / s in 4K mode with maximum graphics quality.
When using DLSS 2.0, the amount of used local video card memory was also reduced by about 600-800 MB. This is good news for owners of the classic GeForce RTX 2060 6 GB, which in such cases turns out to be suitable for 4K mode.
At lower resolutions, the cumulative performance gain is slightly lower than at 3840×2160, but these are still significant numbers. Here you can already adjust the frame rate / s, taking into account the refresh rate of the monitor used.
In general, the first tests of DLSS 2.0 leave a very pleasant impression. The technology can significantly improve gaming performance. At the same time, the quality not only does not suffer, but can even improve when using the appropriate mode. I would like to see more projects with DLSS 2.0, especially those that support ray tracing. The hybrid rendering method usually drops the number of frames / s noticeably, and DLSS in this case could be used as a compensator for the performance degradation.