AMD Radeon R9 380 vs AMD Radeon RX 470: What is the difference?
47points
AMD Radeon R9 380
44points
AMD Radeon RX 470
Comparison winner
vs
54 facts in comparison
AMD Radeon R9 380
AMD Radeon RX 470
Why is AMD Radeon R9 380 better than AMD Radeon RX 470?
- 2 more DVI outputs?
2vs0 - 2 more displays supported?
6vs4 - 21.5mm narrower?
221mmvs242.5mm
Why is AMD Radeon RX 470 better than AMD Radeon R9 380?
- 1.46 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
4.94 TFLOPSvs3.48 TFLOPS - 7.6 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
38.6 GPixel/svs31 GPixel/s - 70W lower TDP?
120Wvs190W - 275MHz faster memory clock speed?
1650MHzvs1375MHz - 1100MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
6600MHzvs5500MHz - 45. 4 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
154.4 GTexels/svs109 GTexels/s - 2x more VRAM?
4GBvs2GB - 35.2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
211.2GB/svs176GB/s
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
MSI Radeon RX 550 Aero ITX 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
AMD Radeon R9 380X
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Gigabyte Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 SC Ultra Gaming
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Radeon R9 380
1 User reviews
AMD Radeon R9 380
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
AMD Radeon RX 470
2 User reviews
AMD Radeon RX 470
8.5/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.0/10
1 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Gaming
9.0/10
1 votes
8.0/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Fan noise
10.0/10
1 votes
7.0/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
970MHz
926MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 380)
1206MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.pixel rate
31 GPixel/s
38.6 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
3.48 TFLOPS
4.94 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
109 GTexels/s
154.4 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1375MHz
1650MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
5500MHz
6600MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
176GB/s
211.2GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
256bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Radeon R9 380
✖AMD Radeon RX 470
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔AMD Radeon R9 380
✔AMD Radeon RX 470
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 470)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon R9 380
✖AMD Radeon RX 470
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔AMD Radeon R9 380
✔AMD Radeon RX 470
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon R9 380
✖AMD Radeon RX 470
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 470)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon R9 380
✔AMD Radeon RX 470
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 380)
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R9 380)
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
Radeon RX 470 vs Radeon R9 380
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- Radeon RX 470 vs Radeon R9 380
-
Radeon RX 470
135%
-
Radeon R9 380
100%
Relative performance
-
Radeon RX 470
167%
-
Radeon R9 380
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 470 |
67% higher gaming performance. |
70 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 380 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 380 |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 470
The Radeon RX 470 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (42 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
Radeon RX 470 | Radeon R9 380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | Ellesmere (Ellesmere PRO) | vs | Antigua (Antigua PRO) | |
Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm | |
Die Size | 232 mm² | vs | 366 mm² | |
Transistors | 5,700 million | vs | 5,000 million | |
Shaders | 2048 | vs | 1792 | |
Compute Units | 32 | vs | 28 | |
Core clock | 926 MHz | vs | 970 MHz | |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 | |
TMUs | 128 | vs | 112 |
Memory Configuration
Radeon RX 470 | Radeon R9 380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit | |
Memory Speed | 1650 MHz 6600 MHz effective |
vs | 1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
Radeon RX 470 | Radeon R9 380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 120 watts | vs | 190 watts | |
Release Date | 29 Jun 2016 | vs | 18 Jun 2015 |
-
Radeon RX 470
38. 60 GP/s
-
Radeon R9 380
31.04 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 470
154.40 GT/s
-
Radeon R9 380
108.60 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 470
211.20 GB/s
-
Radeon R9 380
176.00 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 470
4940.00 GFLOPs
-
Radeon R9 380
3476.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 470
16690
-
Radeon R9 380
12280
Points (higher is better)
DX11, Max Detail, 2xMSAA 16xAF
-
Radeon RX 470
119
-
Radeon R9 380
74
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA
-
Radeon RX 470
51
-
Radeon R9 380
37
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait
-
Radeon RX 470
53
-
Radeon R9 380
35
FPS (higher is better)
OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx
-
Radeon RX 470
84
-
Radeon R9 380
36
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Settings
-
Radeon RX 470
58
-
Radeon R9 380
46
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 470
76
-
Radeon R9 380
54
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF
-
Radeon RX 470
66
-
Radeon R9 380
47
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 470
63
-
Radeon R9 380
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 470
68
-
Radeon R9 380
46
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 470
49
-
Radeon R9 380
37
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Details
-
Radeon RX 470
68
-
Radeon R9 380
52
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF
-
Radeon RX 470
52
-
Radeon R9 380
43
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF
-
Radeon RX 470
65
-
Radeon R9 380
51
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Detail, 2xMSAA 16xAF
-
Radeon RX 470
74
-
Radeon R9 380
51
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA
-
Radeon RX 470
32
-
Radeon R9 380
28
FPS (higher is better)
High Quality Mode, 8 millon samples, 2xMSAA, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 470
46
-
Radeon R9 380
7
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait
-
Radeon RX 470
36
-
Radeon R9 380
25
FPS (higher is better)
OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx
-
Radeon RX 470
55
-
Radeon R9 380
26
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Settings
-
Radeon RX 470
39
-
Radeon R9 380
32
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 470
51
-
Radeon R9 380
40
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF
-
Radeon RX 470
47
-
Radeon R9 380
36
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Detail
-
Radeon RX 470
67
-
Radeon R9 380
54
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 470
44
-
Radeon R9 380
32
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 470
48
-
Radeon R9 380
31
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 470
36
-
Radeon R9 380
28
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Details
-
Radeon RX 470
50
-
Radeon R9 380
38
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF
-
Radeon RX 470
37
-
Radeon R9 380
33
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF
-
Radeon RX 470
44
-
Radeon R9 380
34
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Detail, 2xMSAA 16xAF
-
Radeon RX 470
31
-
Radeon R9 380
28
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA
-
Radeon RX 470
19
-
Radeon R9 380
14
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait
-
Radeon RX 470
15
-
Radeon R9 380
7
FPS (higher is better)
OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx
-
Radeon RX 470
27
-
Radeon R9 380
7
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Settings
-
Radeon RX 470
21
-
Radeon R9 380
9
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 470
25
-
Radeon R9 380
16
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF
-
Radeon RX 470
25
-
Radeon R9 380
14
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Detail
-
Radeon RX 470
34
-
Radeon R9 380
20
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 470
21
-
Radeon R9 380
12
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 470
30
-
Radeon R9 380
21
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 470
22
-
Radeon R9 380
14
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF
-
Radeon RX 470
21
-
Radeon R9 380
15
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF
-
Radeon RX 470
22
-
Radeon R9 380
14
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Detail
-
Radeon RX 470
19
-
Radeon R9 380
9
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
Radeon RX 470 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 470 | Radeon RX 570 |
VS | ||
Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 285 |
VS | ||
Radeon R9 380 | GeForce GTX 770 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 580 2048SP | Radeon RX 580X |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Radeon RX 470 vs Radeon R9 380
Radeon RX 470 vs Radeon R9 380 — Th200
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Specifications
- Benchmarks
- Key Differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Graphics card
Graphics card
Introduction
We compared two GPUs: the AMD Radeon RX 470 versus the AMD Radeon R9 380. On this page you will learn about the key differences between graphics cards and find out which has the best specs and performance.
The AMD Radeon RX 470 is a graphics card of the Arctic Islands (RX 400) generation based on the GCN 4.0 architecture, launched on Aug 4th, 2016. It comes with 4 Gb of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1650 MHz, requires 1x 6-pin power connectors and consumes up to 120 Watts.
The AMD Radeon R9 380 is a graphics card of the Pirate Islands (R9 300) generation based on the GCN 3. 0 architecture, launched on Jun 18th, 2015. It comes with 2 Gb of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1375 MHz, requires 2x 6-pin power connectors and consumes up to 190 Watts.
Specifications
Graphics Card
Name
AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon R9 380
Release Date
Aug 4th, 2016
Jun 18th, 2015
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Graphics Processor
Die Size
232 mm²
366 mm²
Memory
Bandwidth
211.2 GB/s
176.0 GB/s
Theoretical Performance
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
31.04 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
FP16 (half) performance
4.940 TFLOPS (1:1)
3.476 TFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance
4.940 TFLOPS
3.476 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance
308.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
217.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Clock Speeds
Base Clock
926 MHz
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
Memory Clock
1650 MHz
1375 MHz
Render Config
Shading Units
2048
1792
Texture Units
128
112
Raster Units
32
32
Compute Units
32
28
Graphics Features
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_0)
OpenGL
4. 6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
Board Design
TDP
120W
190W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Benchmarks
3DMark Graphics
3DMark is a computer benchmarking tool created and developed by UL, to measure the performance of computer hardware. Running 3DMark produces a 3DMark score, with higher numbers indicating better performance.
AMD Radeon RX 470
+31%
AMD Radeon R9 380
Blender bmw27
Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own Benchmark, which is widely used to determining the rendering performance of processors and graphics cards. Benchmark measures the time needed to render bmw27 scene.
AMD Radeon RX 470
+39%
AMD Radeon R9 380
Th200 RP
Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures raw power of the components and gives score, with higher number indicating better performance.
AMD Radeon RX 470
+32%
AMD Radeon R9 380
Key Differences
Why is AMD Radeon RX 470 better than AMD Radeon R9 380?
Newer — released 1 year later
Has 32% better performance
Consumes up to 37% less energy — 120 Watts versus 190 Watts
More modern manufacturing process — 14 nm versus 28 nm
Has 2 Gb more memory
Has 20% higher bandwidth — 211.2 GB/s versus 176.0 GB/s
Has 25% higher pixel rate — 38.59 GPixel/s versus 31.04 GPixel/s
Has 43% higher texture rate — 154.4 GTexel/s versus 108.6 GTexel/s
Has 16 more texture units
Has 256 more shading units
Has 4 more compute units
Conclusion
Which is better Radeon RX 470 or Radeon R9 380?
The Radeon RX 470 delivers 32% better performance, consumes up to 37% less energy and holds 2 Gb more memory. Based on our research Radeon RX 470 is more powerful than Radeon R9 380.
What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX 470?
The Radeon RX 5300 is AMD’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX 470. It is 4% more powerful, uses 17% less energy, and holds 1 Gb more memory.
What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX 470?
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX 470. It is 6% more powerful, uses 17% less energy, and holds same amount of memory.
How does Radeon RX 470 perform compared to Radeon R9 380 and other graphics cards?
Relative performance
Global performance
Desktop performance
GPU Compare | Graphics Card Comparison
The Radeon RX 470 will run 98% of the top 10,000 PC games. It will also run 79% of these games at the recommended or best experience levels.
- Manufacturer
-
AMD - Generation
- 8 generations old
- Category
-
Enthusiast - Dedicated RAM
-
4. 0 GB - DirectX
-
12 - Rank
-
89th percentile of AMD GPUs - Rank in Power
-
54th of AMD GPUs - Rank in Popularity
-
24th of AMD GPUs
Can the Radeon RX 470 run the Top PC games? You can see a GPU comparison by choosing another video card. How many games can your GPU run?
Radeon RX 470
|
Radeon RX 6950 XT
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Rank | Game |
|
|
1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 |
|
|
2 |
Grand Theft Auto V |
|
|
3 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II |
|
|
4 |
VALORANT |
|
|
5 |
Call of Duty: Warzone |
|
|
6 |
Elden Ring |
|
|
7 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 |
|
|
8 |
FIFA 23 |
|
|
9 |
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered |
|
|
10 |
ARK: Survival Evolved |
|
|
11 |
Fortnite |
|
|
12 |
Minecraft |
|
|
13 |
God of War |
|
|
14 |
Apex Legends |
|
|
15 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive |
|
|
16 |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla |
|
|
17 |
Forza Horizon 5 |
|
|
18 |
League of Legends |
|
|
19 |
The Sims 4 |
|
|
20 |
Slime Rancher 2 |
|
|
21 |
FIFA 22 |
|
|
22 |
Genshin Impact |
|
|
23 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt |
|
|
24 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS |
|
|
25 |
Far Cry 6 |
|
|
26 |
WARZONE |
|
|
27 |
Battlefield 2042 |
|
|
28 |
Phasmophobia |
|
|
29 |
Dying Light 2 Stay Human |
|
|
30 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare |
|
|
31 |
1982 |
|
|
32 |
Sea of Thieves |
|
|
33 |
Battlefield 1 |
|
|
34 |
Grand Theft Auto IV |
|
|
35 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops II |
|
|
36 |
Call of Duty: WW2 |
|
|
37 |
Forza Horizon 4 |
|
|
38 |
PAYDAY 2 |
|
|
39 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey |
|
|
40 |
Assassin’s Creed: Origins |
|
|
41 |
NotGTAV |
|
|
42 |
Hogwarts Legacy |
|
|
43 |
Rust |
|
|
44 |
GTA 5 Thor Mod |
|
|
45 |
Slime Rancher |
|
|
46 |
Battlefield 4 |
|
|
47 |
Assassin’s Creed IV Black Flag |
|
|
48 |
Fallout 4 |
|
|
49 |
Destiny 2 |
|
|
50 |
Overwatch |
|
|
51 |
Rocket League |
|
|
52 |
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege |
|
|
53 |
Deathloop |
|
|
54 |
Assassin’s Creed Unity |
|
|
55 |
Gloomhaven |
|
|
56 |
The Forest |
|
|
57 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 |
|
|
58 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 |
|
|
59 |
Far Cry 5 |
|
|
60 |
Far Cry 3 |
|
|
61 |
Forza Horizon 3 |
|
|
62 |
Fortnite: Battle Royale |
|
|
63 |
Devil May Cry 5 |
|
|
64 |
Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout |
|
|
65 |
Battlefield 5 |
|
|
66 |
Euro Truck Simulator 2 |
|
|
67 |
Far Cry 4 |
|
|
68 |
GTA 5 Premium Online Edition |
|
|
69 |
PUBG Lite |
|
|
70 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops III |
|
|
71 |
Team Fortress 2 |
|
|
72 |
Dark Souls 3 |
|
|
73 |
Dota 2 |
|
|
74 |
Roblox |
|
|
75 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim |
|
|
76 |
Escape from Tarkov |
|
|
77 |
CS:GO — Operation Riptide |
|
|
78 |
Halo Infinite |
|
|
79 |
SEKIRO: SHADOWS DIE TWICE |
|
|
80 |
Overwatch 2 |
|
|
81 |
Batman: Arkham Knight |
|
|
82 |
Age of Empires 4 |
|
|
83 |
Dying Light |
|
|
84 |
Guild Wars 2 |
|
|
85 |
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas |
|
|
86 |
GUNDAM EVOLUTION |
|
|
87 |
Detroit: Become Human |
|
|
88 |
Assassin’s Creed III |
|
|
89 |
Assassin’s Creed Rogue |
|
|
90 |
Left 4 Dead 2 |
|
|
91 |
Dead by Daylight |
|
|
92 |
Watch Dogs 2 |
|
|
93 |
Assassin’s Creed II |
|
|
94 |
Assassin’s Creed |
|
|
95 |
eFootball 2022 |
|
|
96 |
Assassin’s Creed Syndicate |
|
|
97 |
Terraria |
|
|
98 |
Stray |
|
|
99 |
War Thunder |
|
|
100 |
Tekken 7 |
|
|
AMD
NVIDIA
Intel
Rank | GPU |
---|---|
AMD Radeon R9 380 vs.
AMD Radeon RX 580
Currency:
AUDBGNBRLCADCHFCNYCZKDKKEURGBPHKDHRKHUFIDRILSINRISKJPYKRWMXNMYRNOKNZDPHPPLNRONRUBSEKSGDTHBTRYUSDZAR
USD
Electricity Price:
$0.10/kWh
Select a miner
Aisen A1 Pro
Aladdin L2 (30TH)
Aladdin Miner (16TH)
Alpha Miner GPU-200
AMD Radeon HD 7990
AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD Radeon R9 290
AMD Radeon R9 380
AMD Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
AMD Radeon RX 460
AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon RX 480
AMD Radeon RX 560
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon RX 5700
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Radeon VII
Antminer S9-Hydro
ASICminer 8 Nano
ASICminer 8 Nano 44Th/s
ASICminer 8 Nano Compact
ASICminer 8 Nano Pro
ASICminer 8 Nano S 58TH
ASICminer Equihash 40K
ASICminer Zeon
Baikal BK-D
Baikal BK-G28
Baikal BK-N240
Baikal BK-N70
Baikal BK-X
Baikal Giant N
Baikal Giant N+
Baikal Giant X10
Baikal Giant-B
Baikal Giant+ A2000
Bitcoin Gold 2400 h/s mining rig
Bitfily Snow Panther A1
Bitfily Snow Panther B1
Bitfily Snow Panther B1+
Bitmain Antminer A3
Bitmain Antminer B3
Bitmain Antminer B7
Bitmain Antminer D3
Bitmain Antminer D5
Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh)
Bitmain Antminer DR3
Bitmain Antminer DR5
Bitmain Antminer E3
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2. 4GH)
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1.13TH)
Bitmain Antminer L3+
Bitmain Antminer L3++
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5GH)
Bitmain Antminer R4
Bitmain Antminer S1
Bitmain Antminer S11
Bitmain Antminer S15
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100TH)
Bitmain Antminer S3
Bitmain Antminer S4
Bitmain Antminer S5
Bitmain Antminer S7
Bitmain Antminer S9 13.5 TH/s
Bitmain Antminer S9 14 TH/s
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE
Bitmain Antminer S9i
Bitmain Antminer S9j 14.5 TH/s
Bitmain Antminer S9k
Bitmain Antminer T15
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40TH)
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64TH)
Bitmain Antminer T17e (53TH)
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84TH)
Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro (145Th)
Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro (158Th)
Bitmain Antminer T9+
Bitmain Antminer V9
Bitmain Antminer X3
Bitmain Antminer Z11
Bitmain Antminer Z11E
Bitmain Antminer Z11J
Bitmain Antminer Z15
Bitmain Antminer Z15e
Bitmain Antminer Z9
Bitmain Antminer Z9 mini
BITTECH L-One
BITTECH NS
BITTECH One
BITTECH One Mini
BITTECH One S
Bolon Miner B11
BW-L21
Canaan Avalon 6
Canaan AvalonMiner 1041
Canaan AvalonMiner 1041F
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro
Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro
Canaan AvalonMiner 1246
Canaan AvalonMiner 741
Canaan AvalonMiner 761
Canaan AvalonMiner 821
Canaan AvalonMiner 841
Canaan AvalonMiner 911
Canaan AvalonMiner 921
Dayun Zig Z1
Dayun Zig Z1 Pro
Dayun Zig Z1+
Ebang Ebit E10
Ebang Ebit E10D
Ebang Ebit E11
Ebang Ebit E11+
Ebang Ebit E11++
Ebang Ebit E12
Ebang Ebit E12+
Ebang Ebit E9. 2
Ebang Ebit E9.3
Ebang Ebit E9+ 9T
Ebang Ebit E9i
Ethereum miner 168 mh/s
Ethereum miner 172 mh/s
Ethereum miner 180 mh/s
Ethereum mining rig 220 mh/s
Ethereum mining rig 230mh/s
Ethereum mining rig 80mh/s
FFMiner Decred D18
FFMiner DS19
FusionSilicon X1 Miner
FusionSilicon X7 Miner
FusionSilicon X7+
GMO miner B2
GMO miner B3
Goldshell CK Lite
Goldshell CK5
Goldshell CK6
Goldshell HS Lite
Goldshell HS-BOX
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Goldshell HS3
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell HS5
Goldshell KD Lite
Goldshell KD Max
Goldshell KD-BOX
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Goldshell KD2
Goldshell KD5
Goldshell KD6
Goldshell LB Lite
Goldshell LB-BOX
Goldshell LB1
Goldshell LT Lite
Goldshell LT5
Goldshell LT5 Pro
Goldshell LT6
Goldshell Mini-DOGE
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Goldshell SC-BOX
Goldshell ST-BOX
Halong Mining DragonMint B29
Halong Mining DragonMint B52
Halong Mining DragonMint T1
Halong Mining DragonMint X1
Halong Mining DragonMint X2
Holic h32
Hummer Miner Mars h2
iBeLink BM-K1
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
iBeLink BM-K1+
iBeLink BM-N1
iBeLink BM-S1
iBeLink BM-S1 Max
iBeLink DM11G
iBeLink DM22G
iBeLink DM56G
iBeLink DSM6T
iBeLink DSM7T
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster 365MH/s
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster 432MH/s
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster 485MH/s
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH Miner 500MH/s
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH Miner 720MH/s
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH Miner 1. 5 GH/s
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH Miner 2 GH/s
Innosilicon A4 Dominator
Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
Innosilicon A5 DashMaster
Innosilicon A5+ DashMaster
Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster
Innosilicon A6+ LTCMaster
Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster
Innosilicon A8+ CryptoMaster
Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster
Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
Innosilicon A9+ ZMaster
Innosilicon A9++ ZMaster
Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster
Innosilicon D9+ DecredMaster
Innosilicon G32 1800
Innosilicon G32 500
Innosilicon G32 Mini
Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+
Innosilicon T3 (Terminator 3) 43T
Innosilicon T3 (Terminator 3) 50T
Innosilicon T3+ (Terminator 3 Plus) 52T
Innosilicon T3+ 57T
Innosilicon T3+ 67T
Innosilicon Terminator 2 (T2)
Innosilicon Terminator 3 (T3) 39T
iPollo B1
iPollo B1L
iPollo B2
iPollo G1
iPollo G1 Mini
iPollo V1
iPollo V1 Classic
iPollo V1 Mini
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Jasminer X4
Jasminer X4 BRICK
Jasminer X4-1U
Jasminer X4-C 1U
Jasminer X4-Q
MicroBT Whatsminer D1
MicroBT Whatsminer DCR
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S (72T)
MicroBT Whatsminer M20V1 (48T)
MicroBT Whatsminer M20V2 (58T)
MicroBT Whatsminer M21
MicroBT Whatsminer M21S
MicroBT Whatsminer M3
MicroBT Whatsminer M30S
MicroBT Whatsminer M30S+
MicroBT Whatsminer M30S++
MicroBT Whatsminer M31S
MicroBT Whatsminer M31S+
MicroBT Whatsminer M32
MicroBT Whatsminer M32S
MicroBT Whatsminer M3v2
MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
MicroBT Whatsminer M40
MicroBT Whatsminer M50
MicroBT Whatsminer M50S
Monero miner 4230 h/s
Monero miner 5600 h/s
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIA GTX 770
NVIDIA P106-100
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA Titan Xp
Obelisk DCR1
Obelisk GRN1
Obelisk GRN1 Immersion
Obelisk GRN1 Mini
Obelisk SC1
Obelisk SC1 Dual
Obelisk SC1 Immersion
Obelisk SC1 Slim
PandaMiner B3 Mute
PandaMiner B3 Pro
PandaMiner B5 Plus
PandaMiner B7 Pro
Pantech SX6
PinIdea DR-100
PinIdea DR2
PinIdea DR3
PinIdea RR-200
PinIdea RR-210
Snow Leopard
Spondoolies SPx36
Spondoolies-Tech SP10 Dawson
Spondoolies-Tech SP30 Yukon
Spondoolies-Tech SP31 Yukon
StrongU Hornbill H8
StrongU STU-U1
StrongU STU-U1+
StrongU STU-U1++
StrongU STU-U2
StrongU STU-U6
StrongU STU-U8
StrongU STU-U8 Pro
Todek Toddminer C1
Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
Zcash (ZEC) miner
Zcash (ZEC) miner
Zcash (ZEC) mining rig
Zcash (ZEC) mining rig 4400 h/s
vs
Select a miner
Aisen A1 Pro
Aladdin L2 (30TH)
Aladdin Miner (16TH)
Alpha Miner GPU-200
AMD Radeon HD 7990
AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD Radeon R9 290
AMD Radeon R9 380
AMD Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
AMD Radeon RX 460
AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon RX 480
AMD Radeon RX 560
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon RX 5700
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Radeon VII
Antminer S9-Hydro
ASICminer 8 Nano
ASICminer 8 Nano 44Th/s
ASICminer 8 Nano Compact
ASICminer 8 Nano Pro
ASICminer 8 Nano S 58TH
ASICminer Equihash 40K
ASICminer Zeon
Baikal BK-D
Baikal BK-G28
Baikal BK-N240
Baikal BK-N70
Baikal BK-X
Baikal Giant N
Baikal Giant N+
Baikal Giant X10
Baikal Giant-B
Baikal Giant+ A2000
Bitcoin Gold 2400 h/s mining rig
Bitfily Snow Panther A1
Bitfily Snow Panther B1
Bitfily Snow Panther B1+
Bitmain Antminer A3
Bitmain Antminer B3
Bitmain Antminer B7
Bitmain Antminer D3
Bitmain Antminer D5
Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh)
Bitmain Antminer DR3
Bitmain Antminer DR5
Bitmain Antminer E3
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2. 4GH)
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1.13TH)
Bitmain Antminer L3+
Bitmain Antminer L3++
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5GH)
Bitmain Antminer R4
Bitmain Antminer S1
Bitmain Antminer S11
Bitmain Antminer S15
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73TH)
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd (198Th)
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90TH)
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100TH)
Bitmain Antminer S3
Bitmain Antminer S4
Bitmain Antminer S5
Bitmain Antminer S7
Bitmain Antminer S9 13.5 TH/s
Bitmain Antminer S9 14 TH/s
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE
Bitmain Antminer S9i
Bitmain Antminer S9j 14.5 TH/s
Bitmain Antminer S9k
Bitmain Antminer T15
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40TH)
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64TH)
Bitmain Antminer T17e (53TH)
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84TH)
Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro (145Th)
Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro (158Th)
Bitmain Antminer T9+
Bitmain Antminer V9
Bitmain Antminer X3
Bitmain Antminer Z11
Bitmain Antminer Z11E
Bitmain Antminer Z11J
Bitmain Antminer Z15
Bitmain Antminer Z15e
Bitmain Antminer Z9
Bitmain Antminer Z9 mini
BITTECH L-One
BITTECH NS
BITTECH One
BITTECH One Mini
BITTECH One S
Bolon Miner B11
BW-L21
Canaan Avalon 6
Canaan AvalonMiner 1041
Canaan AvalonMiner 1041F
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro
Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro
Canaan AvalonMiner 1246
Canaan AvalonMiner 741
Canaan AvalonMiner 761
Canaan AvalonMiner 821
Canaan AvalonMiner 841
Canaan AvalonMiner 911
Canaan AvalonMiner 921
Dayun Zig Z1
Dayun Zig Z1 Pro
Dayun Zig Z1+
Ebang Ebit E10
Ebang Ebit E10D
Ebang Ebit E11
Ebang Ebit E11+
Ebang Ebit E11++
Ebang Ebit E12
Ebang Ebit E12+
Ebang Ebit E9. 2
Ebang Ebit E9.3
Ebang Ebit E9+ 9T
Ebang Ebit E9i
Ethereum miner 168 mh/s
Ethereum miner 172 mh/s
Ethereum miner 180 mh/s
Ethereum mining rig 220 mh/s
Ethereum mining rig 230mh/s
Ethereum mining rig 80mh/s
FFMiner Decred D18
FFMiner DS19
FusionSilicon X1 Miner
FusionSilicon X7 Miner
FusionSilicon X7+
GMO miner B2
GMO miner B3
Goldshell CK Lite
Goldshell CK5
Goldshell CK6
Goldshell HS Lite
Goldshell HS-BOX
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Goldshell HS3
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell HS5
Goldshell KD Lite
Goldshell KD Max
Goldshell KD-BOX
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Goldshell KD2
Goldshell KD5
Goldshell KD6
Goldshell LB Lite
Goldshell LB-BOX
Goldshell LB1
Goldshell LT Lite
Goldshell LT5
Goldshell LT5 Pro
Goldshell LT6
Goldshell Mini-DOGE
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Goldshell SC-BOX
Goldshell ST-BOX
Halong Mining DragonMint B29
Halong Mining DragonMint B52
Halong Mining DragonMint T1
Halong Mining DragonMint X1
Halong Mining DragonMint X2
Holic h32
Hummer Miner Mars h2
iBeLink BM-K1
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
iBeLink BM-K1+
iBeLink BM-N1
iBeLink BM-S1
iBeLink BM-S1 Max
iBeLink DM11G
iBeLink DM22G
iBeLink DM56G
iBeLink DSM6T
iBeLink DSM7T
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster 365MH/s
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster 432MH/s
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster 485MH/s
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH Miner 500MH/s
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH Miner 720MH/s
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH Miner 1. 5 GH/s
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH Miner 2 GH/s
Innosilicon A4 Dominator
Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
Innosilicon A5 DashMaster
Innosilicon A5+ DashMaster
Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster
Innosilicon A6+ LTCMaster
Innosilicon A8 CryptoMaster
Innosilicon A8+ CryptoMaster
Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster
Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
Innosilicon A9+ ZMaster
Innosilicon A9++ ZMaster
Innosilicon D9 DecredMaster
Innosilicon D9+ DecredMaster
Innosilicon G32 1800
Innosilicon G32 500
Innosilicon G32 Mini
Innosilicon S11 SiaMaster
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+
Innosilicon T3 (Terminator 3) 43T
Innosilicon T3 (Terminator 3) 50T
Innosilicon T3+ (Terminator 3 Plus) 52T
Innosilicon T3+ 57T
Innosilicon T3+ 67T
Innosilicon Terminator 2 (T2)
Innosilicon Terminator 3 (T3) 39T
iPollo B1
iPollo B1L
iPollo B2
iPollo G1
iPollo G1 Mini
iPollo V1
iPollo V1 Classic
iPollo V1 Mini
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Jasminer X4
Jasminer X4 BRICK
Jasminer X4-1U
Jasminer X4-C 1U
Jasminer X4-Q
MicroBT Whatsminer D1
MicroBT Whatsminer DCR
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S (72T)
MicroBT Whatsminer M20V1 (48T)
MicroBT Whatsminer M20V2 (58T)
MicroBT Whatsminer M21
MicroBT Whatsminer M21S
MicroBT Whatsminer M3
MicroBT Whatsminer M30S
MicroBT Whatsminer M30S+
MicroBT Whatsminer M30S++
MicroBT Whatsminer M31S
MicroBT Whatsminer M31S+
MicroBT Whatsminer M32
MicroBT Whatsminer M32S
MicroBT Whatsminer M3v2
MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
MicroBT Whatsminer M40
MicroBT Whatsminer M50
MicroBT Whatsminer M50S
Monero miner 4230 h/s
Monero miner 5600 h/s
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIA GTX 770
NVIDIA P106-100
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA Titan Xp
Obelisk DCR1
Obelisk GRN1
Obelisk GRN1 Immersion
Obelisk GRN1 Mini
Obelisk SC1
Obelisk SC1 Dual
Obelisk SC1 Immersion
Obelisk SC1 Slim
PandaMiner B3 Mute
PandaMiner B3 Pro
PandaMiner B5 Plus
PandaMiner B7 Pro
Pantech SX6
PinIdea DR-100
PinIdea DR2
PinIdea DR3
PinIdea RR-200
PinIdea RR-210
Snow Leopard
Spondoolies SPx36
Spondoolies-Tech SP10 Dawson
Spondoolies-Tech SP30 Yukon
Spondoolies-Tech SP31 Yukon
StrongU Hornbill H8
StrongU STU-U1
StrongU STU-U1+
StrongU STU-U1++
StrongU STU-U2
StrongU STU-U6
StrongU STU-U8
StrongU STU-U8 Pro
Todek Toddminer C1
Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
Zcash (ZEC) miner
Zcash (ZEC) miner
Zcash (ZEC) mining rig
Zcash (ZEC) mining rig 4400 h/s
Ethash, Equihash, NeoScrypt, Lyra2REv2, CryptoNightV7, CryptoNight, Blake (14r), LBRY, Pascal, X11Gost, TimeTravel10 |
Algorithms |
Ethash, CryptoNightV7, PHI1612, NeoScrypt, Equihash, Xevan, TimeTravel10, Lyra2REv2, Groestl, NIST5, Blake (14r), CryptoNight, LBRY, Pascal, X11Gost |
---|---|---|
Bytecoin, EthereumPoW, QuarkChain, Verge-Lyra2REv2, Monacoin, Callisto, Feathercoin, Trezarcoin, Etho, Hush, Horizen, Zcash, Komodo, GoByte, EtherGem, Expanse, LBRY, Decred |
Minable Coins |
EthereumPoW, QuarkChain, Callisto, GroestlCoin, Bytecoin, Etho, EtherGem, Hush, Horizen, Zcash, Komodo, Verge-Lyra2REv2, Monacoin, Feathercoin, Expanse, Trezarcoin, LBRY, GoByte, Decred |
CryptoNightEthashLyra2REv2NeoScryptEquihashLBRYBlake (14r) | The Best Algorithm | EthashGroestlCryptoNightEquihashLyra2REv2NeoScryptLBRYBlake (14r) |
490 H/s | Hash Rate | 26 MH/s |
160 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
$0. 00/d | Revenue | $0.09/d |
$0.38/d | Electricity Cost | $0.36/d |
($0.38)/d | Profitability | ($0.27)/d |
Payback |
ETHW |
|
No offers for this product |
Buy Options |
Available Newegg Price: $169.99 Payback: never Buy now
Available Newegg Price: $189.99 Payback: never Buy now
Out Of Stock Newegg Price: $132.99 Payback: never Buy now See All Offers |
AMD Radeon RX 470 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X
|
|
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X
Comparaison des caractéristiques techniques entre les cartes graphiques, avec AMD Radeon RX 470 d’un côté et AMD Radeon R9 380X de l’autre. La première est dédiée au secteur ordinateur de bureau, elle possède 2048 unités d’ombrage, une fréquence maximale de 1,2 GHz, sa lithographie est de 14 nm. La seconde est employée sur le segment ordinateur de bureau, elle dispose de 2048 unités d’ombrage, une fréquence maximale de 1,0 GHz, sa lithographie est de 28 nm. Le tableau suivant permet aussi de comparer la fréquence maximale, le nombre d’unités d’ombrage (si indiqué), d’unités d’exécution, la quantité de mémoire cache, la capacité maximale de mémoire, la largeur du bus mémoire, la date de première diffusion, le nombre de lignes PCIe, les valeurs obtenues dans différents benchmarks.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
Cette page contient des références aux produits d’un ou de plusieurs de nos annonceurs. Nous pouvons recevoir une compensation lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers ces produits. Pour une explication de notre politique publicitaire, veuillez visiter cette page.
Caractéristiques :
Carte graphique | AMD Radeon RX 470 | AMD Radeon R9 380X | ||||||
Marché (principal) | Ordinateur de bureau | Ordinateur de bureau | ||||||
Date de lancement | Q3 2016 | Q4 2015 | ||||||
Numéro de modèle | 215-0876204, Polaris 10 PRO | 215-0877016, Antigua XT | ||||||
Nom du GPU | Ellesmere | Antigua | ||||||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 | ||||||
Génération | Arctic Islands RX 400 | Pirate Islands R9 300 | ||||||
Lithographie | 14 nm | 28 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 5. 700.000.000 | 5.000.000.000 | ||||||
Interface du bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||||
GPU, cadence de base | 926 MHz | 970 MHz | ||||||
GPU, cadence maxi | 1,21 GHz | 970 MHz | ||||||
Fréquence de la mémoire | 1.650 MHz | 1.425 MHz | ||||||
Vitesse effective de la mémoire | 6,6 GB/s | 5,7 GB/s | ||||||
Taille de la mémoire | 4 GB | 4 GB | ||||||
Type de la mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | ||||||
Bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit | ||||||
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211,2 GB/s | 182,4 GB/s | ||||||
PDT | 120 W | 190 W | ||||||
Alimentation système recommandée | Alimentation PC de 300W | Alimentation PC de 450W | ||||||
Technologie multicartes | — | — | ||||||
Sorties |
1x HDMI |
2x DVI |
||||||
Cœurs (unités de calcul, SM, SMX) | 32 | 32 | ||||||
Unités d’ombrage | 2. 048 | 2.048 | ||||||
TMUs | 128 | 128 | ||||||
ROPs | 32 | 32 | ||||||
Mémoire cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | ||||||
Taux de remplissage des pixels | 38,6 GP/s | 31,0 GP/s | ||||||
Débit de filtrage | 154,4 GT/s | 124,2 GT/s | ||||||
Performance FP16 (moitié) | 4,9 TFLOPS | 4,0 TFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP32 (simple) | 4,9 TFLOPS | 4,0 TFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP64 (double) | 308,7 GFLOPS | 248,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
Prix : pour des raisons techniques, nous ne pouvons pas afficher pour le moment un prix de moins de 24 heures, ou un prix en temps réel. C’est pourquoi on préfère pour l’instant ne pas faire apparaître de prix. Il faut vous référer aux boutiques en ligne respectives pour connaître le dernier prix, ainsi que la disponibilité.
On peut ainsi mieux comparer quelles sont les différences techniques entre les deux cartes graphiques.
Performances :
Comparaison des performances entre les deux processeurs, pour cela on considère les résultats générés sur des logiciels de benchmarks tels que Geekbench 4.
Performance FP32 en GFLOPS | |
---|---|
AMD Radeon RX 470 |
4.940 |
AMD Radeon R9 380X |
3.973 |
La différence est de 24%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces cartes graphiques, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Le format à virgule flottante simple précision, également appelé FP32, est un format de numéro pour ordinateur qui occupe en général 32 bits dans la mémoire du PC. Cela représente une large plage dynamique de valeurs numérique qui emploie une virgule flottante.
Voir aussi :
AMD Radeon RX 470D
AMD Radeon R9 380AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM
Équivalence :
AMD Radeon RX 470 équivalent NvidiaAMD Radeon R9 380X équivalent Nvidia
Avertissement :
Lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers divers marchands sur ce site et que vous effectuez un achat, cela peut avoir pour résultat que ce site gagne une commission. Les programmes d’affiliation et les affiliations incluent, mais sans se limiter à, eBay Partner Network.
En tant que Partenaire Amazon, je réalise un bénéfice sur les achats remplissant les conditions requises.
Cette page comprend des liens d’affiliation pour lesquels l’administrateur de GadgetVersus peux gagner une commission sans frais supplémentaires si vous effectuez un achat. Ces liens sont indiqués à l’aide du hashtag #pub.
Information :
Nous n’assumons aucune responsabilité pour les données affichées sur notre site. S’il vous plaît utiliser à vos risques. Une partie ou la totalité de ces données peut être périmée ou obsolète, veuillez vous référez à la page technique sur le site du fabricant respectif pour trouver les dernières informations à jour concernant les spécificités de ce produit.
AMD Radeon R9 380 vs AMD Radeon RX 470: What is the difference?
47 BALLLA
AMD Radeon R9 380
44 Ballla
AMD Radeon RX 470
Winter when comparing
VS
54 facts compared to
AMD Radeon R9 380 9000 Is 380 better than AMD Radeon RX 470?
- 2 more DVI outputs?
2 vs 0 - Supports 2 more displays?
6 vs 4 - 21. 5mm narrower?
221mm vs 242.5mm
- 1.46 TFLOPS over FLOPS?
4.94 TFLOPS vs 3.48 TFLOPS - 7.6 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
38.6 GPixel/s vs 31 GPixel/s - 70W below TDP?
120W vs 190W - 275MHz faster memory speed?
1650MHz vs 1375MHz - 1100MHz higher effective clock speed?
6600MHz vs 5500MHz - 45.4 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
154.4 GTexels/s vs 109 GTexels/s - 2x more VRAM?
4GB vs 2GB - 35.2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
211.2GB/s vs 176GB/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon RX 470
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1050380
VS
MSI GEFORCE GTX 1050 TI OC
AMD Radeon RX 470
VS
AMD Radeon RX 560
AMD Radeon R9 380
VS 9000 470
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
AMD Radeon R9 380X
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
AMD Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Gigabyte Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
0004 8. 5 /10
2 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
8.0 /10
1 Votes
/10 9000 /10
1 Votes
8.0 /10
2 Votes
003
Fan noise
10.0 /10
1 Votes
7.0 /10
2 Votes
Reliability
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
970MHz
926MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.turbo GPU
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9380)
1206MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
31 GPixel/s
38. 6 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
3.48 TFLOPS
4.94 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
109 GTexels/s
154.4 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1375MHz
1650MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
5500MHz
6600MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
176GB/s
211.2GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4. memory bus width
256bit
256bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5.versions of GDDR memory
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Radeon R9 380
✖AMD Radeon RX 470
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔AMD Radeon R9 380
✔AMD Radeon RX 470
The video card has the ability to connect multiple displays. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5. GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 470)
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon R9 380
✖AMD Radeon RX 470
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔AMD Radeon R9 380
✔AMD Radeon RX 470
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon R9380
✖AMD Radeon RX 470
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 470)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon R9 380
✔AMD Radeon RX 470
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9 380)
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices such as game consoles and TVs at the same time.
HDMI version 3
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R9 380)
HDMI 2.0
New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003
Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
Price Match
Cancel
Which graphics cards are better?
AMD Radeon R9 380 vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (mobile) comparison, which is better?
General information | |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
48.7%
12.5% (34.5%) better than |
36.2% |
Architecture |
|
GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Codename |
|
Antigua | Ellesmere |
Type |
|
Desktop | For laptops |
Release price |
|
$199
-350.99 $ (-63.8%) better than |
$549.99 |
Number of shaders |
|
1792 | 2048
256 (14.3%) better than |
Core clock |
|
n/a | 926 MHz |
Boost frequency |
|
970 MHz | 1074 MHz
104 MHz (10. 7%) better than |
Number of transistors |
|
5.000 million | 5.700 million |
Process |
|
28 nm | 14 nm
-14 nm (-50%) better than |
Interface |
|
PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
190W | 85 W
-105 W (-55.3%) better than |
Length |
|
221 mm | n/a |
Additional power connectors |
|
2 x 6-pin | n/a |
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). |
|
+ | n/a |
Decred / DCR (Decred) |
|
0.66 Gh/s | n/a |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) |
|
1 Sol/s | n/a |
Bus |
|
PCIe 3.0 | n/a |
Design |
|
reference | n/a |
Number of Compute conveyors |
|
28 | n/a |
CrossFire without bridge |
|
+ | n/a |
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
|
— | n/a |
Eyefinity |
|
+ | n/a |
Number of Eyefinity Monitors |
|
6 | n/a |
HDMI |
|
DisplayPort ready |
|
FRTC |
|
+ | n/a |
FreeSync |
|
+ | + |
HD3D |
|
+ | n/a |
LiquidVR |
|
+ | n/a |
PowerTune |
|
+ | n/a |
TrueAudio |
|
+ | n/a |
ZeroCore |
|
+ | n/a |
VCE |
|
+ | n/a |
Audio DDMA |
|
+ | n/a |
OpenCL |
|
2. 0 | n/a |
Mantle |
|
+ | n/a |
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready |
|
n/a | + |
Form factor |
|
full height / full length / dual slot | n/a |
Video connectors |
|
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DirectX |
|
DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Floating point performance |
|
3.476 gflops | 4.399 gflops |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
18 Mh/s | n/a |
CrossFire |
|
+ | n/a |
Memory | |
Memory type |
|
GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
4 GB | 8 GB
4 GB (100%) better than |
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games. |
|
256 bit | 256 bit |
Shared memory |
|
— | — |
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
970 MHz | 7000 MHz
At 6030 MHz (621.6%) better than |
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
182.4 | 224
41.6 (22.8%) better than |
Compare AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 380X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 380X video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Technical specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
versus
AMD Radeon R9 380X
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Newer graphics card, 8 month(s) difference in release dates:
- more core frequencies in Boost mode 1206 MHz vs 970 MHz
- 24% faster texturing speed: 154. 4 GTexel / s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Approximately 58% less power consumption: 120 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 6.8 times more memory frequency: 6600 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Approximately 30% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 8096 vs 6210
- About 9% more performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 730 vs 667
- About 3% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 9685
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase benchmark Offscreen (Fps) about 3% more: 9983 vs 9685
- Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score about 20% better: 3668 vs 3058
Release date | 4 August 2016 vs 19 November 2015 |
Boost core clock | 1206 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texturing speed | 154. 4 GTexel/s vs 124.2 GTexel/s |
Process | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Memory frequency | 6600 MHz vs 970 MHz |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 8096 vs 6210 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 730 vs 667 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 9685 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 9685 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 3668 vs 3058 |
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon R9 380X
- 810. 8 times more floating point performance: 3,973 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan benchmark performance vs approx. 2443
- GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 2x more performance: 3361 vs 1674
- About 52% more GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) performance: 3717 vs 2443
- Benchmark performance GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) x2: 3361 vs 1674
Floating point performance | 3.973 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 1674 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380X
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|||
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 380X |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 8096 | 6210 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 730 | 667 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 39085 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1823.32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.929 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 9685 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 9685 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 3668 | 3058 |
Feature comparison
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 380X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | GCN 4. 0 | GCN 3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Codename | Ellesmere | Antigua | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Generation GCN | 4th Gen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue date | 4 August 2016 | November 19, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price at first issue date | $179 | $229 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Place in the rating | 231 | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price now | $109. 99 | $528.44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type | Desktop | Desktop | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 100.00 | 15.61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boost core clock | 1206 MHz | 970MHz | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Compute | 32 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core clock | 926 MHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Floating point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 3.973 gflops | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Process | 14nm | 28nm | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shaders | 2048 | 2048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stream Processors | 2048 | 2048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texturing speed | 154. 4 GTexel/s | 124.2 GTexel/s | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 190 Watt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 5,000 million | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DisplayPort support | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dual-link DVI support | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HDMI | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VGA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eyefinity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Eyefinity Displays | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CrossFire without bridge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Length | 241 mm | 221 mm | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recommended power supply | 450 Watt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tire | PCIe 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DirectX | 12 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OpenCL | 2. 0 | 2.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vulcan | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mantle | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum memory size | 4GB | 4GB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memory bus width | 256bit | 64bit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memory frequency | 6600MHz | 970MHz | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shared memory | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4K h364 Decode | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4K h364 Encode | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMD Eyefinity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CrossFire | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DisplayPort 1. 3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FreeSync | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h365/HEVC Decode | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h365/HEVC Encode | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HDMI 2.0b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HDMI 4K Support | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PowerTune | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TrueAudio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ZeroCore | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DDMA audio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FRTC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HD3D | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LiquidVR |
GCN ARCHITECTURE | 4th generation |
COMPUTER UNITS | 32 computing units |
STREAM PROCESSORS | 2048 |
CLOCK (BOOSTER/BASE) | 1206 MHz / 926 MHz |
PEAK | Up to 4. 9 teraflops |
MEMORY CLOCK (MHz) | 1650 |
MEMORY BANDWIDTH | 211 GB/s |
MEMORY INTERFACE | 256 bit |
MEMORY TYPE | GDDR5 |
TYPICAL POWER CONSUMPTION OF THE | 120 W |
AMD FREESYNC™ TECHNOLOGY | Yes |
DIRECTX® 12 SUPPORT | Yes |
VULKAN™ SUPPORT | Yes |
VIRTUAL ULTRA HIGH RESOLUTION | Yes |
HDMI VERSION | 2.0 |
DISPLAYPORT VERSION | compatible with 1.4 HDR |
AMD EYEFINITY TECHNOLOGY (MAXIMUM NUMBER OF MONITORS) | Up to 6 monitors with DisplayPort MST hub |
Manufacturers
Many companies have started serial production of this video card, the most famous of them are: Gigabyte, MSI, XFX, Asus, PowerColor. All of them are somewhat different and have their own distinctive features.
ASUS
Asus version will please the user with factory overclocking of the processor, it can work in two modes «OS» and «Gaming». The first with a frequency of up to 1270 MHz, the second up to 1250 MHz. The memory frequency is 1650 MHz, while the effective frequency is 6600 MHz. The manufacturer claims that this model is 25% faster than its predecessor — Radeon R9380. The video card is assembled on an Asus corporate design printed circuit board. There is a power subsystem consisting of six phases. Five for graphics GPU, one for memory needs. There is also a six-pin connector so that additional power can be supplied to the device. The card is cooled using the DirectCU II system, which consists of an aluminum heatsink and a pair of fans that turn off when the device temperature is low, as well as several heat pipes.
PowerColor
PowerColor has similar graphics card specifications, but GDDR5 video memory in combination with a seven-phase power system and an eight-pin connector should in theory have a slightly better overclocking potential. The card’s memory has a frequency response of 1750 MHz, while the effective one is 7000 MHz. The cooling system is also quite good, especially if you take into account the massive radiator, as well as the special shape of the blades used in the fan.
MSI
MSI presents 4 types of card. They are divided into two lines: Gaming and Gaming X. Both lines have cards with 4 and 8 GB, respectively. The GPU of the Gaming line operates at frequencies not exceeding 1230 MHz, and the memory is about 6600 MHz. Gaming X is represented by overclocking the GPU within 1254 MHz, as well as memory at 6700 MHz. All cards have a 6-phase power subsystem, as well as an eight-pin connector for it. The card is cooled using Twin Frozr VI technology.
Gigabyte
Gigabyte has only shown the 4 GB model so far. The GPU is brought up to 1230 MHz, the memory is at 6600 MHz. The structure of the power subsystem: 6 + 1 — phases, eight-pin connector. The card is cooled using «WindForce 2X». In addition, there is an intensifying plate and backlight.
XFX
«XFX» demonstrates 4 variations of «RX 470» at once. And all have only 4 GB of memory. 4+1 phase and six-pin connector are the distinguishing features of the power system. Models differ only in quantity often, however, one model has a special cooling system built in.
The most powerful model «Radeon RX 470 RS Black Limited Edition» has a 1280 MHz processor and 7000 MHz memory.
Performance and benchmarks RX 470
To begin with, let’s compare the 4 and 8 GB versions of the video card with each other, and then consider their performance compared to other analogues.
With such a comparison, it is important to take into account that regardless of the amount of memory, its frequency in both variations will be identical, namely 6600 MHz. The same data bus is 256 bits.
And so, let’s go through the games on which the testing took place. All games were set to maximum graphics with all additional textures in both 1080p and 4K resolutions.
Total War: Warhammer
At 1080p, the 8 GB model delivers 69 frames, while its smaller 4 GB brethren gets 65 frames.
Things are much worse at 4K. 8 GB has 24 frames, while 4 GB has 22 frames. However, it is understandable. If you want to play in such high resolution — take two RX 470.
DOOM (2016)
At 1080p, the 8 GB model produces 87 frames, while the 4 GB model produces 84.
At 4K, the result is 29 and 27 frames, respectively.
GTA V
At 1080p, the 8 GB model produces 81 fps, while the 4 GB model achieves 76 fps.
At 4K, the result is 29 and 25 frames, respectively.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
At 1080p, the 8 GB variation has 52 frames, while the 4 GB variation has 49.
At 4K, 8 GB has 24 frames, while 4 GB has only 22.
Total
As we can see, the difference between the 4 and 8 GB versions is not so significant and averages 3-5 fps.
Comparison of Radeon RX 470 with analogs
Consider the capabilities of the «RX 470» in comparison with its closest competitors using specific examples.
Batman: Arkham Knight
Video card | FPS |
Radeon RX 480 8GB | 45.8 — 71.5 |
Radeon R9290 4GB | 44.2 — 65 |
Radeon RX 470 4GB | 41 – 66.2 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 47 – 73 |
GeForce GTX 970 4GB | 43 – 69 |
Battlefield 4
Video card | FPS |
Radeon RX 480 8GB | 34 — 48.4 |
Radeon R9 290 4GB | 41.2 — 52.2 |
Radeon RX 470 4GB | 31. 8 — 43.9 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 54.2 — 69.4 |
GeForce GTX 970 4GB | 45 — 58.4 |
However, after overclocking, the RX 470 improves its performance by 15% and reaches the level of the RX 480.
Fallout 4
Video card | FPS |
Radeon RX 480 8GB | 38.8 — 49.4 |
Radeon R9 290 4GB | 39.4 — 49.7 |
Radeon RX 470 4GB | 37 – 45 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 43 – 56.1 |
GeForce GTX 970 4GB | 41.4 — 51.9 |
After overclocking, «RX 470» also goes to the level of RX 480.0537
When overclocking the RX 470, it even beats the 480 by 3-4%.
Applicability and output
Among graphics cards under $300, the «RX 470» performs well and is one of the leading models, especially considering that it is often significantly cheaper than its counterparts for the same power. This is especially true for rivals from Nvidia. A distinctive feature of the card is its overclocking potential, which even an ordinary user can unleash.
For whom and for what purpose is this video card suitable? Of course, it is primarily aimed at gamers, but high technical performance allows it to be successfully used in the field of 3D modeling and video rendering.