Rx580 vs gtx1050ti: AMD RX 580 vs Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti

AMD RX 580 vs Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti

YouTube*NEW*

About

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	174 EFps	252 EFps	Much Better CSGO EFps. +45%
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	44 EFps	59 EFps	Much Better GTAV EFps. +34%
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	46 EFps	79 EFps	Much Better Overwatch EFps. +72%
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	43 EFps	70 EFps	Much Better PUBG EFps. +63%
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	54 EFps	84 EFps	Much Better Fortnite EFps. +56%

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 1,889,913 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

1,036,829 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 35% MSI(1462 3351)
Worst Bench: 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 29%

Great: 35%

SPEED RANK: 147^th / 688

853,084 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 60% Gigabyte(1458 22F1)
Worst Bench: 47% PowerColor(148C 2378)

Poor: 47%

Great: 60%

SPEED RANK: 99^th / 688


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		30. 9 %			54.7 %	Much faster effective speed. +77%


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	37.6 fps	65.1 fps	Much better lighting effects. +73%
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	41.5 fps	62.5 fps	Much better reflection handling. +51%
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	37.8 fps	64 fps	Much faster multi rendering. +69%
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	39. 2 fps	72.4 fps	Hugely faster NBody calculation. +85%


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	44.1 fps	72.4 fps	Much better peak lighting effects. +64%
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	48.1 fps	66.7 fps	Much better peak reflection handling. +39%
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	38.9 fps	68 fps	Much faster peak multi rendering. +75%
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	43. 4 fps	79.9 fps	Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. +84%

Market Share

Based on 55,710,100 GPUs tested.

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	2.16 %	Much higher market share. +54%	1.4 %
Value Value For Money	63.8 %	Better value. +28%	49.8 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	79 %	+4%	76 %
Price Price (score)	$115	Much cheaper. +56%	$260


Age Newest	71 Months	66 Months	Slightly more recent. +7%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	41.7 fps	99.5 fps	Hugely better peak texture detail. +139%
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	29.1 fps	49.2 fps	Much faster peak complex splatting. +69%
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	38.2 fps	88 fps	Hugely better texture detail. +130%
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	26.7 fps	46.5 fps	Much faster complex splatting. +74%

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. ^{[Oct ’16 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. ^{[Apr ’17 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Asus PRIME A320M-K (630)

bin bin (544)

Dell OptiPlex 7010 (480)

Dell XPS 8930 (461)

Gigabyte B450M DS3H (454)

Asus h210M-K (436)

MSI h210M PRO-VD (MS-7996) (355)

Gigabyte B450M DS3H (8,913)

Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (6,887)

Asus PRIME B450M-A (6,646)

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (5,147)

Asrock B450M Pro4 (4,898)

Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (3,572)

Asus PRIME A320M-K (3,471)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.

Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.

Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

— Download and run UserBenchmark.

— CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.

— GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.

— Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.

— RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.

— SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.

— Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.

— Identify the strongest components in your PC.

— See speed test results from other users.

— Compare your components to the current market leaders.

— Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.

— Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated



Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti



Nvidia RTX 3070



Nvidia RTX 3050



Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)



Nvidia RTX 3080



Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)



Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)



Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB



Nvidia RTX 2060



AMD RX 6600-XT



AMD RX 5600-XT



Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD RX 570 vs Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

Watch Gameplay

CSGO

Dust 2 1080p Max 174 EFps 233 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+34%

GTAV

Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 44 EFps 53 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+20%

Overwatch

Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 46 EFps 68 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+48%

PUBG

M249 Training 1080p Max 43 EFps 57 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+33%

Fortnite

UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 54 EFps 61 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+13%

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 1,452,779 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

1,036,829 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 35% MSI(1462 3351)
Worst Bench: 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 29%

Great: 35%

SPEED RANK: 147^th / 688

415,950 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 38% MSI(1462 341B)

Poor: 38%

Great: 52%

SPEED RANK: 116^th / 688

Effective 3D Speed

Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 30. 9 % 46.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+50%

Lighting

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 37.6 fps 54.6 fps Much better lighting effects.
+45%

Reflection

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 41.5 fps 59 fps Much better reflection handling.
+42%

MRender

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 37.8 fps 59.3 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+57%

Gravity

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 39. 2 fps 61.2 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+56%

Lighting

Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 44.1 fps 62.6 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+42%

Reflection

High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 48.1 fps 63.1 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+31%

MRender

Render target array GShader (Sphere) 38.9 fps 61.7 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+59%

Gravity

NBody particle system (Galaxy) 43. 4 fps 67.7 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+56%

Market Share

Based on 55,710,100 GPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days) 2.16 % Hugely higher market share.
+123% 0.97 %

Value

Value For Money 63.8 % 84.2 % Much better value.
+32%

User Rating

UBM User Rating 79 % More popular.
+18% 67 %

Price

Price (score) $115 Cheaper.
+12% $130

Age

Newest 71 Months 66 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%

Parallax

Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 41.7 fps 86.5 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+107%

Splatting

Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 29.1 fps 46.2 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+59%

Parallax

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 38.2 fps 77 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+102%

Splatting

Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 26.7 fps 43.7 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+64%

ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. ^{[Oct ’16 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is based on the second generation Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series. The RX 570 is around 10% faster than its predecessor, the RX 470. With 2048 cores, it is a cut down version of the RX 580 which is $30 more expensive and around 20% faster. At $130, the RX 570 offers superb value to gamers on a very tight budget. By dropping detail levels slightly below maximum the RX 570 can deliver 60 EFps in most of today’s popular games. If at all possible, we would suggest spending around $50 more for the 30% faster 8GB RX 590 which can comfortably hold 60+ EFps at 1080p with maximum details. ^{[Nov ’19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Asus PRIME A320M-K (630)

bin bin (544)

Dell OptiPlex 7010 (480)

Dell XPS 8930 (461)

Gigabyte B450M DS3H (454)

Asus h210M-K (436)

MSI h210M PRO-VD (MS-7996) (355)

Gigabyte B450M DS3H (6,700)

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (4,411)

Asus PRIME A320M-K (4,205)

Asrock B450M Pro4 (3,251)

Asus PRIME B450M-A (3,176)

Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H (2,885)

Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (2,869)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.

Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.

Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

— Download and run UserBenchmark.

— CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.

— GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.

— Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.

— RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.

— SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.

— Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.

— Identify the strongest components in your PC.

— See speed test results from other users.

— Compare your components to the current market leaders.

— Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.

— Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated



Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti



Nvidia RTX 3070



Nvidia RTX 3050



Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)



Nvidia RTX 3080



Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)



Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)



Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB



Nvidia RTX 2060



AMD RX 6600-XT



AMD RX 5600-XT



Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD RX 590 vs Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

Watch Gameplay

CSGO

Dust 2 1080p Max 174 EFps 270 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+55%

GTAV

Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 44 EFps 64 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+45%

Overwatch

Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 46 EFps 85 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+85%

PUBG

M249 Training 1080p Max 43 EFps 79 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+84%

Fortnite

UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 54 EFps 92 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+70%

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 1,156,581 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

1,036,829 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 35% MSI(1462 3351)
Worst Bench: 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 29%

Great: 35%

SPEED RANK: 147^th / 688

119,752 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 65% MSI(1462 C411)
Worst Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)

Poor: 52%

Great: 65%

SPEED RANK: 90^th / 688

Effective 3D Speed

Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 30. 9 % 60 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+94%

Lighting

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 37.6 fps 71.1 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+89%

Reflection

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 41.5 fps 68.5 fps Much better reflection handling.
+65%

MRender

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 37.8 fps 68.2 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+80%

Gravity

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 39. 2 fps 80.1 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+104%

Lighting

Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 44.1 fps 78.1 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+77%

Reflection

High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 48.1 fps 70.9 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+47%

MRender

Render target array GShader (Sphere) 38.9 fps 71.7 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+84%

Gravity

NBody particle system (Galaxy) 43. 4 fps 87.7 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+102%

Market Share

Based on 55,710,100 GPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days) 2.16 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,100% 0.18 %

Value

Value For Money 63.8 % 71.1 % Better value.
+12%

User Rating

UBM User Rating 79 % +1% 78 %

Price

Price (score) $115 Much cheaper.
+43% $200

Age

Newest 71 Months 47 Months Much more recent.
+34%

Parallax

Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 41.7 fps 111 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+166%

Splatting

Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 29.1 fps 54.1 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+86%

Parallax

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 38.2 fps 99.2 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+160%

Splatting

Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 26.7 fps 52.5 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+97%

ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. ^{[Oct ’16 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. ^{[Nov ’19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Asus PRIME A320M-K (630)

bin bin (544)

Dell OptiPlex 7010 (480)

Dell XPS 8930 (461)

Gigabyte B450M DS3H (454)

Asus h210M-K (436)

MSI h210M PRO-VD (MS-7996) (355)

Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (1,628)

Gigabyte B450M DS3H (1,581)

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (1,205)

Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H (1,147)

Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (1,129)

Asrock B450M Pro4 (811)

Asus PRIME B450M-A (783)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.

Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.

Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

— Download and run UserBenchmark.

— CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.

— GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.

— Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.