AMD Athlon 200GE vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Athlon 200GE vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Athlon 200GE | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen | Zen | ||||||
| Core name | Raven Ridge | Raven Ridge | ||||||
| Family | Athlon 200 | Ryzen 3 2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
YD200GC6M2OFB, |
YD2200C5M4MFB, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2018 | Q1 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 950.000.000 |
4.950.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 3,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2666 |
DDR4-2933 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 39,74 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 35 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 550W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Raven) | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Raven) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 3 | 8 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 684 GFLOPS | 1. 126 GFLOPS |
||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 95°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
||||||
| Security |
— |
Enhanced Virus Protection, |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 247 | 419 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 955 | 1. 694 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 120 | 140 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 360 | 585 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 769 | 953 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.060 | 3.637 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.810 | 2.047 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 4.147 | 6.766 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.628 | 3.922 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
7. 137 |
10.594 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
88,06 GFLOPS | 174,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
204 pts / W | 163 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 3 2200G has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Athlon 200GE is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
419 1.694 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
247 955 |
In single core, the difference is 70%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 77%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
140 585 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
120 360 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 63%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
953 3.637 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
769 2.060 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 77%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
2.047 6.766 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
1.810 4.147 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 63%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
3.922 10.594 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
3.628 7.137 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
4.  1519.301 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
3.740 6.747 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
3.451 7.420 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
3.201 6.145 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
On Mac OS X:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
4.211 12.142 |
| AMD Athlon 200GE |
4.  6819.717 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 25%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Equivalence:
AMD Athlon 200GE Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 3 2200G Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GEAMD Ryzen 3 2200U
AMD Athlon 200GE vs. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Athlon 200GE
The AMD Athlon 200GE operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads.
It run at 3.20 GHz base 3.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 (LGA 1331) CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Raven Ridge (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q3/2018
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.65 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 (LGA 1331) CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Raven Ridge (Zen) Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q1/2018
AMD Athlon 200GE
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Compare Detail
3. 20 GHz |
Frequency | 3.50 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.65 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics |
GPU |
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
4. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| AM4 (LGA 1331) | Socket | AM4 (LGA 1331) |
| 35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q3/2018 | Release date | Q1/2018 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.
5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.