Ryzen 2600 vs 2700x: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs 7 2700X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs 7 2700X

28 May20|Techpowerup

Intel Core i5-10400F Review — Six …
6 % FarC5 5%, BFV 8%, SotTR 3%, Civ6 17%, ACO 7%, MetroEx 2%, Sekiro 6%, Wolf2 9% Rage2 1%, Witcher3 1%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus

Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki…
7 % Hitm2 9%, TWarW2 3%, GTAV 8%, SotTR 9%
14 Nov19|PCGamer

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
5 % Hitm2 9%, FarC5 5%, TWarW2 8%, SotTR 5%, ACO 10%, MetroEx 4%, MESoW 1%, Divis2 4% StrangeB 0%
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency
76.3 Pts +1% 75.6 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
110 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+6%
104 Pts
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
214 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+8%
199 Pts
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
405 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+10%
369 Pts
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
729 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+14%
637 Pts
Memory

OC Memory Latency
88. 1 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5%
83.9 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Mixed Speed
123 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+8%
114 Pts
2-Core

OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
241 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+8%
224 Pts
4-Core

OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
475 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+9%
437 Pts
8-Core

OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
900 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+24%
728 Pts
Age

Newest
52 Months 52 Months
TDP

Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores

CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads

CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography

Manufacturing process
12 nm 12 nm
Base Clock

Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock

Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
3.9 GHz
64-Core

OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1385 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+42%
972 Pts
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1169 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+38%
848 Pts
Series

CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen+
Socket

Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics

Integrated Graphics
None None

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: What is the difference?

52points

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

51points

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600 better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X?

  • 10°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    95°Cvs85°C
  • 40W lower TDP?
    65Wvs105W
  • 0. 67MB/core more L3 cache per core?
    2.67MB/corevs2MB/core

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700X better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

  • 45.1% faster CPU speed?
    8 x 3.7GHzvs6 x 3.4GHz
  • 4 more CPU threads?
    16vs12
  • 1MB bigger L2 cache?
    4MBvs3MB
  • 33.44% higher PassMark result?
    17623vs13207
  • 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    4.3GHzvs3.9GHz
  • 192KB bigger L1 cache?
    768KBvs576KB
  • 8.12% higher PassMark result (single)?
    2437vs2254
  • 44.41% higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
    3951vs2736

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

Intel Core i9-9900K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

Intel Core i3-10100F

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

4 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

10. 0/10

4 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

2 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

9.0/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

4 votes

8.5/10

2 votes

Gaming

10.0/10

4 votes

8.0/10

2 votes

Performance

10.0/10

4 votes

8.0/10

2 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

4 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Energy efficiency

10.0/10

4 votes

7.5/10

2 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.4GHz

8 x 3.7GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.9GHz

4.3GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

2.67MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

2933MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

43.71GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

295.1seconds

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 5 2600: performance comparison

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X with 8-cores against the 3.4 GHz Ryzen 5 2600 with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 7 2700X

57

Ryzen 5 2600

54

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 7 2700X

48

Ryzen 5 2600

35

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 7 2700X

46

Ryzen 5 2600

50

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 7 2700X

53

Ryzen 5 2600

47

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 2600 and 2700X

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz)

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600

  • Consumes up to 38% less energy than the Ryzen 7 2700X – 65 vs 105 Watt
  • Newer — released 5-months later
  • More than 10° C higher critical temperature

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 7 2700X
+10%

1102

Ryzen 5 2600

1004

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 7 2700X
+43%

10072

Ryzen 5 2600

7037

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 7 2700X
+9%

2430

Ryzen 5 2600

2233

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 7 2700X
+33%

17442

Ryzen 5 2600

13159

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 7 2700X
+3%

1064

Ryzen 5 2600

1035

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 7 2700X
+30%

7338

Ryzen 5 2600

5623

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600

General

Vendor AMD AMD
Released April 19, 2018 September 11, 2018
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen+ Zen+
Socket AM4 AM4
Integrated GPU No No

Performance

Cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Base Frequency 3. 7 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4.3 GHz 3.9 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 37x 34x
L1 Cache 96K (per core) 96K (per core)
L2 Cache 512K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes
Transistors 4.8 billions 4.8 billions
Fabrication process 12 nm 12 nm
TDP 105 W 65 W
Max. temperature 85°C 95°C

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-2933
Memory Size 64 GB 64 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes
Official site AMD Ryzen 7 2700X official page AMD Ryzen 5 2600 official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 7 2700X

46 (68.7%)

Ryzen 5 2600

21 (31.3%)

Total votes: 67

Сompetitors

1.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

2.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

3.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

4.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600

5.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

6.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

7.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i5 10400F

8.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

9.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 or Ryzen 7 2700X?

Name

Message

Promotion

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Destiny 2 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Destiny 2

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X


Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 7 2700X

Multi-Thread Performance

13503 Pts

16960 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2008 Pts

2190 Pts

Destiny 2

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X in Destiny 2 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 7 2700X


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

102. 5 FPS

1080p

110.0 FPS

1440p

88.0 FPS

1440p

94.4 FPS

2160p

44.3 FPS

2160p

47.6 FPS

w1440p

70.8 FPS

w1440p

75.9 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

160.9 FPS

1080p

170.7 FPS

1440p

141.5 FPS

1440p

150.1 FPS

2160p

78.8 FPS

2160p

83.8 FPS

w1440p

117.7 FPS

w1440p

124.8 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

219. 2 FPS

1080p

231.4 FPS

1440p

194.9 FPS

1440p

205.8 FPS

2160p

113.3 FPS

2160p

120.1 FPS

w1440p

164.5 FPS

w1440p

173.7 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

336.0 FPS

1080p

352.8 FPS

1440p

301.9 FPS

1440p

317.2 FPS

2160p

182.4 FPS

2160p

192.5 FPS

w1440p

258.3 FPS

w1440p

271.6 FPS

Ryzen 5 2600
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
Ryzen 7 2700X
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
Ryzen 5 2600 Ryzen 7 2700X
Codename Zen Zen
Generation Ryzen 5
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Ryzen 7
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# YD2600BBM6IAF unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released Apr 2018 Apr 2018
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
Ryzen 5 2600 Ryzen 7 2700X
Cache L1 96K (per core) 96K (per core)
Cache L2 512K (per core) 512K (per core)
Cache L3 16MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
Ryzen 5 2600 Ryzen 7 2700X
# of Cores 6 8
# of Threads 12 16
Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
SMP # CPUs 1 1
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features
Ryzen 5 2600 Ryzen 7 2700X
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Notes
Ryzen 5 2600 Ryzen 7 2700X
This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
Ryzen 5 2600 Ryzen 7 2700X
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3. 4 GHz 3.7 GHz
Multiplier 34.0x 37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
TDP 65 W 105 W
Turbo Clock up to 3.9 GHz up to 4.35 GHz
Voltage unknown variable
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
Ryzen 5 2600 Ryzen 7 2700X
Die Size 192 mm² 192 mm²
Foundry GlobalFoundries GlobalFoundries
Package µOPGA-1331 µOPGA-1331
Process Size 12 nm 12 nm
Socket AMD Socket AM4 AMD Socket AM4
Transistors 4800 million 4800 million
tCaseMax unknown unknown

Share Your Comments 0

Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X


Cpu Benchmark with benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
3.40 GHz Frequency 3.70 GHz
3.90 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 4.30 GHz
3.70 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 3.85 GHz
6 Cores 8
Yes Hyperthreading ? Yes
Yes Overclocking ? Yes
normal Core architecture normal
no iGPU GPU no iGPU
DirectX Version
Max. displays
DDR4-2933 Memory DDR4-2933
2 Memory channels 2
Max. Memory
Yes ECC Yes
L2 Cache
16. 00 MB L3 Cache 16.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
20 PCIe lanes 20
12 nm Technology 12 nm
AM4 Socket AM4
65 W TDP 105 W
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Q2/2018 Release date Q2/2018
show more detail show more detail

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Benchmark. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Benchmark’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible

Popular Comparision

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — Cpu Benchmark Specs & Test

4.1 of 41 rating(s)

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X & Ryzen 5 2600X Review

This might be surprising, but it’s been more than a year since we tested AMD’s original Ryzen CPU series based on the 14nm Zen architecture, a launch that represented a clean slate for AMD and wound up being a huge success, especially among value-oriented system builders. After seeing several processor generations from AMD that couldn’t keep up with rival Intel chips, it’s been great to have more competition in the CPU sector and it raises the question of whether we can expect similar results from the new Zen+ architecture.

Based on the 12nm process, AMD sent us its new Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X processors for testing. The company tells us that Zen+ offers a reduction in cache latency (anywhere from 13% up to 34%), an 11% reduction in DRAM latency, IPC improvements of approximately 3%, and improved memory support for greater frequencies. So that all sounds good.

In addition to all of that, being that Zen+ is based on the Globalfoundries 12LP process (LP for «Leading Performance»), you can reportedly expect these chips to handle higher frequencies and offer improved power consumption. AMD says this new process provides transistor performance that is 10-15% better than the previously used process. In short, we are seeing a 300MHz increase in clock speed up to 4.3GHz, a 50mV reduction in core voltage, and a possible all-core overclock of around 4.2GHz.

AMD has announced four 2nd-gen Ryzen CPUs so far, and today we are testing the X models. The non-X 2600 and 2700 are available, but AMD forbid us testing them in time for today’s release. So we’ve pre-ordered those models and will have a proper review of them shortly.












  Ryzen 7 2700X Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600X Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP $330 $300 $230 $200
Cores / Threads 8 / 16 8 / 16 6 / 12 6 / 12
Base Frequency 3. 7 GHz 3.2 GHz 3.6 GHz 3.4 GHz
Boost Frequency 4.3 GHz 4.1 GHz 4.2 GHz 3.9 GHz
L2 Cache 4MB 4MB 3MB 3MB
L3 Cache 16MB 16MB 16MB 16MB
Memory Config Dual-Channel
Max Mem Support DDR4-2933
TDP 105 W 65 W 95 W 65 W
Box cooler AMD Prism RGB AMD Spire RGB AMD Spire AMD Stealth

Things worth noting from the table above is that the 2700X is an 8-core/16-thread CPU with a 3.7 GHz base and a 4.3 GHz max boost frequency. The 2600X is a 6-core/12-thread CPU that operates 100 MHz lower for the base and boost clocks.

The 2700X costs $330 and the 2600X just $230. So that means the 2700X is coming in well under the 1800X and 1700X launch prices, matching the 1700. The 2600X sits between the launch price of the 1600X and 1600, so AMD looks as though they’re going to continue to be extremely competitive on pricing.

Those are the highlights and while there are more things we could talk about, such as XFR2 or SenseMI Technology, we’re going to skip over that for now and discuss our testing methods before jumping right into the results.

Testing Notes

For testing the new second-gen Ryzen CPUs, we’re primarily using the Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate, but we’ve also double checked the results using the Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7. Both boards worked flawlessly. The memory of choice is G.Skill’s SniperX DDR4-3400 CL16 and I’ve merely loaded the XMP profile. All testing has been conducted with the box coolers unless specified otherwise and this goes for all CPUs benchmarked in this article. For the unlocked Intel K processors the Corsair h210i v2 was used.

The first-gen Ryzen CPUs which include the Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 5 1600 have been tested on the Asrock X370 Taichi using G.Skill’s FlareX DDR4-3200 CL14 memory. Unfortunately, I didn’t have more time to include additional first-gen Ryzen CPUs to the results, but these two parts will give us a good idea of what we’re looking at in terms of gains for the newer processors.

All of the data has been updated for this review, meaning it’s all fresh and has been gathered in the past two weeks, so I couldn’t simply just carry over the 1600X or 1700 data from previous tests, those need to be retested. All testing was done with the latest drivers, Windows updates, motherboard BIOS updates, game and application updates.

Throughout the testing we’ll be looking at stock out of the box performance as well as overclocking. The first-gen Ryzen CPUs have been overclocked to 4GHz, while I was able to get the 2600X stable at 4. 1GHz and the 2700X at 4.2GHz. I should note that it was difficult getting my 2700X stable at 4.2GHz.

Hitting 4.2GHz on all cores wasn’t easy and it required 1.4 volts to pass our hour-long Blender stress test. For this overclock I used the Corsair h250i Pro. The 2600X failed the stress test at 4.2GHz, forcing our chip down to 4.1GHz which was disappointing, but maybe we got a bad chip, time will tell. Also remember nothing is guaranteed with overclocking and as we put this article together we don’t know if these are good or bad overclocks. AMD suggests that overclocks are now in the range of 4.2GHz, but we’re taking that with a grain of salt until there is more data.

Still, the good news is that our 2600X was stable at 4.1GHz using the Wraith Spire box cooler and I’ll include temperatures at the end of the review. Due to time constraints, as mentioned before, we did run out of time for testing and including as many first-gen Ryzen CPUs as we’d have liked to. We also didn’t have time to overclock the Skylake-X CPUs, but is something we’ll do in a future article.

That’s about everything, time to get into the benchmarks.

Benchmarks

Before we get into the application and gaming benchmarks, here’s a quick look at memory bandwidth performance. Despite using slightly faster DDR4-3400 memory, the second-gen Ryzen CPUs are comparable to the original parts with a throughput of around 39GB/s.

Overclocked memory bandwidth remains much the same but I’ll likely explore memory scaling performance in greater detail during a future article.

Above are Cinebench R15’s results and here we see some really nice gains. Please note that we don’t report the absolute best score but rather the average of six back to back runs and the 2700X does deliver slightly better results with an upgraded cooler.

The 2700X improves on the 1800X’s single thread score by 11%, though just 8% for the multi-threaded score, but that was enough to edge out the Core i7-7820X. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 5 2600X looks impressive compared to the non-X 1600, and although it only matched the single-thread score of the 7800X, it was 7% faster for the multi-threaded test.

The 2700X is a beast when overclocked, producing a multi-threaded score of 1879pts or 7% faster than a 1800X that is maxed out at 4GHz. It also beat the 5.2GHz 8700K by a convincing 13% margin. The 2600X on the other hand was less impressive, improving on its stock score by just 4%.

The Ryzen 7 2700X was 10% faster than the 1800X for the PCMark 10 video editing test and this placed it roughly on part with the 7700K and ahead of the 7820X and 8600K. The 2600X managed to match the R7 1800X and i7-7800X, though it was only slightly faster than the R5 1600.

Overclocked, the 2700X was 6% faster in this test while the 2600X was just 3% faster. It’s already looking like overclocking the Ryzen 5 2600X is going to be a waste of time.

The Ryzen 7 2700X dominated the PCMark 10 physics benchmark with a score of 20985pts, once again 10% faster than the 1800X. This time the 2600X was 15% faster than the 1600 which is an impressive gain, though of course the margin will be reduced compared to the 1600X.

Overclocked, both the 2700X and 2600X eke out a little extra performance, though in this test it’s hardly worth getting excited over.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700: What is the difference?

52 BALLLA

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

57 Ballla

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Winter when comparing

VS

64 Facts compared to 9000 Is 2600 better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700?

  • 0.67MB/core more L3 cache per core?
    2.67MB/core vs 2MB/core
  • Has NX bit?

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700 better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600?

  • 25.49% faster CPU speed?
    8 x 3.2GHz vs 6 x 3.4GHz
  • 4 more CPU threads?
    16 vs 12
  • 1MB more L2 cache?
    4MB vs 3MB
  • 19.27% ​​higher PassMark score?
    15752 vs 13207
  • 192KB more L1 cache?
    768KB vs 576KB
  • 19% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
    6243 vs 5246
  • 26. 02% higher Cinebench R20 score (multi-core)?
    3448 vs 2736
  • 7.75% higher Cinebench R20 result (single core)?
    403 vs 374

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD RYZEN 7 2700

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x 9000 AMD Ryzen AMD Ryzen AMD Ryzen AMD

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD RYZEN 5 5500U

AMD Ryzen 7 22 22 20004 AMD RYZEN 7 2700X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

VS

Intel Core i5-9400f

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 9000 VS AMD RYZEN 5000 VS AMD 3400G

AMD RYZEN 7 2700

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 9000

17000 AMD RYZEN 7,000 AMD Ryzen 7 5 2600

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 4500u

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

VS

Intel Core i7-7700k

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

VS

VS Core

AMD Ry 7 27000 AMD RYUT RY 7 27000 AMD Ry

Intel Core i5-9400f

Complexation prices

cheaper

users reviews

total rating

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

4 Reviews of users

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

9,0003

004

10. 0 /10

4 reviews of users

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

2 Reviews of users

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

10.0 /10

2 Reviews of Users

9009

10.0 /10

4 Votes

10.0 /10

2 Votes

Games

10.0 /10

4 VOTES

10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 /10

2 Votes

performance

10.0 /10

4 Votes

10.0 /10

2 Votes

Reliability

10.0 /10 9000

VOTES

/10

2 Votes

Energy Efficiency

10.0 /10

4 VOTES

/10

2 VOTES

performance

1. Squealing of the central processor

6 x 3.4GHz

8 x 3.2GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.9GHz

4.1GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2.67MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

2933MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

43.71GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4. Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory debug code

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This benchmark measures CPU performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Result Cinebench R20 (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

295.1seconds

243.7seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

750.9seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700

processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. TrustZone enabled

✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600

✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) .

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600:

performance comparison

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Which is better: 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700 at 3. 2 GHz or Ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores at 3.4 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 12nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one kernel

Ryzen 7 2700

53

Ryzen 5 2600

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei

Ryzen 7 2,000 9000 9000 are involved 43

Ryzen 5 2600

35

Energy Efficiency

Chip Energy Efficiency

RYZEN 7 2700

49

Ryzen 5 2600

50

Rating NanoreView

Final rating of the processor

RYZEN 7 2700

Ryzen 5 2600

9000 47

Key differences

What are the main differences between 2600 and 2700

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700

  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 5% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 1 GHz vs 3.9GHz)

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600

  • Launched 5 months later than rival

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Ryzen 7 2700
+4%

1049

Ryzen 5 2600

1004

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Ryzen 7 2700
+26%

8871

Ryzen 5 2600

7037

Passmark CPU (Single Core)

Ryzen 7 2700

2179

Ryzen 5 2600
+2%

2233

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Ryzen 7 2700
+18%

15593

Ryzen 5 2600

13159

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Ryzen 7 2700

0zen 50 60 60
+3%

1035

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Ryzen 7 2700
+20%

6773

Ryzen 5 2600

5623

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 5 2600 Full Specs List

General information

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Release date 19April 2018 September 11, 2018
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen+ Zen+
Socket AM4 AM4
Integrated graphics No No

Performance

Cores 8 6
Number of threads 16 12
Frequency 3. 2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.1 GHz 3.9 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 34x
Level 1 cache 96KB (per core) 96KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 512KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 16MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier Yes Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors 4.8 billion 4.8 billion
Process 12 nanometers 12 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 65 W
Critical temperature 95°C 95°C

Memory support

Memory type DDR4-2933 DDR4-2933
Max. size 64 GB 64 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC support Yes Yes

Other

Official site AMD Ryzen 7 website 2700 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 website
PCI Express version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 20 20

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Ryzen 7 2700

76 (70.4%)

Ryzen 5 2600

32 (29.6%)

Total votes: 108

Competitors

1.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 2600

2.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen 5 2600

3.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 5 2600

4.
Intel Core i5 10400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600

5.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Ryzen 5 2600

6.
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G vs Ryzen 5 2600

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Ryzen 5 2600

68.1 (+2.5%)

Ryzen 7 2700

66.4

Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. Ryzen 7

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Ryzen 5 2600

63.2 (+3.6%)

Ryzen 7 2700

60.9

Demanding games and tasks

Ryzen 5 2600

48

Ryzen 7 2700

48.7 (+1.4%)

Extreme

Ryzen 5 2600

16. 3

Ryzen 7 2700

20.4 (+20.1%)

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

1040

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

1057 (+1.6%)

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

7555

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

8947 (+15. 6%)

Cinebench R20 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

374

403 403 (+7.2%) Core

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

2736

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

3448 (+20.6%)

Cinebench R15 Single Core

9000 Cinebench R15 Multi Core

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

1310

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

1529 (+14.3%)

Geekbench 5 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

977 (+3.4%)

AMD RYZEN

944

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

5351

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

6252 (+14.4%)

Blender 2.81 BMW27 9000 9000

omd Ryzen 5000 9000

000 AMD Ryzen

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

231

Geekbench 3 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

4280

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

4400 (+2.7%)

Geekbench 3 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

21714

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

23660 (+8.2%)

Cinebench R11.

5

AMD RYZEN 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Cinebench R111.5 AMD 5 2600

13.92

AMD RYZEN 7 2700

16.8 (+17.1%)

Passmark

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

13219

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

15716 (+15.9%)

of the characteristics of

. , so the tables may be missing information or missing existing features.

Main

Manufacturer AMD AMD
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. No data No data
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2020 09-2020
Model Official name.
Cores The number of physical cores. 6 8
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 12 16
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard).
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 3.8 No data
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. No data No data
Instructions
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. No data No data
Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. No data No data
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. No data No data
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.

RAM

Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. No data No data
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.
RAM bandwidth
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

PCI

configuration options

PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. No data No data
PCI
Number of PCI lanes No data

Data Protection

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

Decoration

Dimensions No data No data
Supported sockets No data No data
Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

Which is better

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

  • On average, gaming performance is 1% better.
  • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 2%.
  • Price lower by $110
  • Base clock higher by 0.2 GHz.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

  • Faster and 4% better in complex multi-threaded applications.
  • The number of physical cores is 2 more.
  • The number of threads is 4 more.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 7 2700 processors (Pinnacle Ridge) testing multi-core processors for the AM4 platform. We also tested the older representatives of the Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 lines at the same time, but mentioned that both have peculiar “poor relatives”, which actually differ from them only in clock speeds and price. The latter makes the Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 7 2700 even a little more interesting from a budget-conscious buyer’s point of view, since, unlike Intel, AMD favorably overclocks any processor in the Ryzen family, so different frequencies are just different

by default frequencies, but in practice they can become the same. Most buyers are, of course, not ready to engage in “manual tuning”, but everyone has a desire to save money. Especially when you can save money due to only quantitative, but not qualitative differences: after all, both the top-end Ryzen 7 2700X and the slightly cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 are eight-core processors for the same mass platform. And the Ryzen 5 2600, like the Ryzen 5 2600X, is equipped with six dual-threaded cores — but in his case, the savings are even more relevant, since it is he, paired with the «old» Ryzen 5 1600, that is the cheapest solution with a «wheel formula» 6/12, competing in this parameter with the more expensive Intel Core i7 for the «second version» LGA1151.

The only question that remains to be clarified is how the performance compares in new pairs and whether there are any other “hidden bonuses” at a lower frequency (at least this should have a beneficial effect on power consumption — namely, it is for us in older models like times and did not like it). Well, you also need to compare the «younger» processors with other solutions on the market.

Test stand configuration

Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 7 2700 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Core name Pinnacle Ridge Pinnacle Ridge Pinnacle Ridge Pinnacle Ridge
Production technology 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm
Core frequency, GHz 3. 4/3.9 3.6/4.2 3.2/4.1 3.7/4.3
Number of cores/threads 6/12 6/12 8/16 8/16
L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 384/192 384/192 512/256 512/256
L2 cache, KB 6×512 6×512 8×512 8×512
L3 cache, MiB 16 16 16 16
RAM 2×DDR4-2933 2×DDR4-2933 2×DDR4-2933 2×DDR4-2993
TDP, W 65 95 65 105
Number of PCIe 3.0 lanes 20 20 20 20
Price

ask prices

ask prices

ask prices

ask prices

This is what the new 2000 series looks like when finished. It is easy to see that, in addition to the frequency, the requirements for the cooling system have also decreased — obviously not from scratch 🙂 What happens in practice with energy consumption — we will definitely check it.

Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AMD Ryzen 5 1600X AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
Core name Raven Ridge

Summit Ridge Summit Ridge Summit Ridge
Production technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm
Core frequency, GHz 3.6/3.9 3.2/3.6 3.6/4.0 3.6/4.0
Number of cores/threads 4/8 6/12 6/12 8/16
L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 256/128 384/192 384/192 512/256
L2 cache, KB 4×512 6×512 6×512 8×512
L3 cache, MiB 4 16 16 16
RAM 2×DDR4-2933 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666
TDP, W 65 65 95 95
Number of PCIe 3. 0 lanes 12 20 20 20
Price

ask prices

ask prices

ask prices

ask prices

We used a couple of models of the previous line last time, and today we decided to expand this list to four models, adding to it not only the Ryzen 5 1600, but also the Ryzen 5 2400G. The latter, we recall, is an APU — and with a very productive (in its class) graphics core. True, you have to pay for everything: in these models there is only one CCX, i.e. strictly no more than four processor cores. Accordingly, the performance of the 2400G should be noticeably different from the 2600, although both belong to the Ryzen 5 line. But the savings opportunities (both in monetary terms and in terms of size and / or power consumption) are higher in this case. Accordingly, it makes sense to compare all the pluses and minuses in practice, and using the 2400G in the most interesting version: without a discrete video card. It is clear that for games these are radically different layouts, but today we decided once again to do without them.

Processor Intel Core i3-8350K Intel Core i5-8400 Intel Core i5-8600K Intel Core i7-8700K
Core name Coffee Lake Coffee Lake Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Production technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm
Core frequency, GHz 4.0 2.8/4.0 3.6/4.3 3.7/4.7
Number of cores/threads 4/4 6/6 6/6 6/12
L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 128/128 192/192 192/192 192/192
L2 cache, KB 4×256 6×256 6×256 6×256
L3 cache, MiB 8 9 9 12
RAM 2×DDR4-2400 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666
TDP, W 91 65 95 95
Number of PCIe 3. 0 lanes 16 16 16 16
Price

ask prices

ask prices

ask prices

ask prices

But «expanded and deepened» in the direction of inexpensive models, the list of used Intel processors. There will be four of them — as in the last article, but the place of a couple of models for LGA2066 will be taken by the Core i5-8400 (the cheapest six-core Intel) and … Core i3-8350K, which, in fact, has to compete directly in retail not only with Ryzen 5 2400G, but also with Ryzen 5 1600/2600. And the presence of an integrated video core does not quite save the situation: after all, the UHD Graphics 630, by today’s standards, has not only too low performance in gaming applications, but also limited multimedia capabilities. As a result, even for simple viewing of video in modern formats or for connecting high-resolution monitors, many buyers prefer to purchase at least an inexpensive discrete plug. In addition, the i3-8350K is also interesting from the point of view that (as we saw in our time) in normal mode, it is almost identical to the Core i5-7600K, i.e. the best Core i5 «generations» up to the seventh inclusive. A lot of them have been sold over the past years, and many owners are already interested in the question: what can you get when switching to new platforms for money comparable to the initial costs? In the case of Intel, everything is simple and clear: two more cores of comparable architecture. But Ryzen 5 can also be considered as a possible upgrade option, this is about the same price class.

All processors, except (as already mentioned) Ryzen 5 2400G were tested together with the GeForce GTX 1070 video card. Ryzen (for five out of eight processors, it is also already full-time, and we did not test the “thousanders” according to the current version of the methodology with lower frequencies).

Test methodology

The methodology is described in detail in a separate article. Here we briefly recall that it is based on the following four pillars:

  • iXBT.com performance measurement method based on 2017 real world applications
  • Methodology for Measuring Power Consumption in Processor Testing
  • How to Monitor Power, Temperature, and Processor Load During Testing
  • 2017 Sample Game Performance Measurement Methodology

Detailed results for all tests are available as a complete results spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel 97-2003). Directly in the articles, we use already processed data. This is especially true for application tests, where everything is normalized relative to the reference system (AMD FX-8350 with 16 GB of memory, GeForce GTX 1070 graphics card and Corsair Force LE 960 GB SSD) and grouped by computer application areas.

With this material, we seem to be completing the use of the 2017 version of the test method, since the new one is almost ready. For the same reason, it was decided to do without gaming tests — how they behave on the GeForce GTX 1070 together with the tested processors is understandable, and what will change in newer projects, we will study a little later.

iXBT Application Benchmark 2017

In principle, the Ryzen 7 2700 is already enough to slightly overtake the Core i7-8700K, but it is just as slightly behind the previous «flagship» AMD — which can be considered the rationale for the existence of the 2700X 🙂 Well As for cheaper models, the situation is even more favorable for the new line: Ryzen 5 2600 not only outperforms any Core i5, but is practically equivalent to the “old” 1600X, and this calls into question the need for a 2600X. And it is clearly seen that further attempts to save on performance are already fraught: after all, APUs and “clean” CPUs of the Ryzen 5 family differ more in technical characteristics than six- and eight-core models.

Nothing changes in rendering for Ryzen 5, but Ryzen 7 looks a little less convincing: in fact, only one model for AM4 can compete with the older Core i7-8700K (which once again hints that it’s not always possible to compare only the number of different cores). right). However, the Ryzen 7 2700 looks good for its price, and the speed can be increased manually if desired — which distinguishes it from, for example, the Core i7-8700.

The degree of multithreading utilization by these programs is lower than in the previous two cases — which plays into the hands of Ryzen 5: the 2600X almost caught up with the 2700. And let’s focus on the fact that in the older pair of new processors for AM4, the performance differs much more than in the younger one. In fact, this is no coincidence — and below we will show why.

«Multi-core» is needed even less, so «per thread» performance is extremely important. And in this case, as we already wrote, there are no special improvements in the “restyled” Ryzen — they still lag behind Intel processors in such conditions. Even the already known problems with one of the Photoshop filters inherent in the latest generation Core i3 and Core i5 still do not let them noticeably lag behind, for example, the Ryzen 5 2400G in the overall standings, and the Core i7 turn out to be the undisputed leaders. On the other hand, the new AMD processors are slightly faster than their immediate predecessors — and that’s enough.

Once again, we see that, despite the success of the new AMD architecture, it still cannot directly compete with Intel developments — a certain head start is required in the number of cores (or, at least, computation threads). But since the company can provide it at the current price level, everything is in order from the point of view of the buyer.

And the work with memory has also practically not changed, so the state of affairs has not changed radically either. By the way, let’s again pay attention to the big difference in the 2700/2700X pair and the small one in the 2600/2600X.

However, some internal architecture optimizations were carried out. And they led to funny effects — the Ryzen 5 2600 is already enough to overtake any Intel processors for the «new» LGA1151, the 2600X does this with the «last year» series of processors for AM4, and the new Ryzen 7 is simply . .. the fastest in the class . It is in its own way — since, for example, the Core i7-7820X is even faster. But this is a completely different story — and not always with a happy ending.

What can you say about performance in the end? Firstly, the spread in the Ryzen 5 family is very large — APUs and CPUs differ radically: the former compete with the Core i3 at best, which is not bad, but the latter convincingly overtake the Core i5. Secondly, it’s hard to say that “X is only slightly faster than without X”: in the Ryzen 7 line, the difference cannot be called insignificant. On the other hand, there is a «third»: Ryzen 7 2700 still looks great. And perhaps not only in terms of performance…

Energy consumption and energy efficiency

The picture is even more mixed with energy consumption. Ryzen 5 2600X, as we have already noted, is not only faster than 1600X, but also hotter — but this does not apply to Ryzen 5 2600: it is identical to 1600. Our copy of Ryzen 7 2700X turned out to be very voracious — but 2700 is more economical than even 2600, not just 2600X.

This is especially evident if you pay attention to the «net» consumption of processors. For example, it is clearly visible that at minimal loads, the new «without X» behave like last year’s Ryzen. But the «X» models, even in this case, began to work worse. Moreover, inspired by the results of the new younger members of the family, we also retested the Ryzen 7 2700X (and what if this is a consequence of “finishing” the firmware of the board or something like that) — he did not feel better.

Performance, however, is also different for everyone, so it’s better to evaluate everything as a whole. And it is clear that for Intel processors, for example, the “energy efficiency” introduced in this way is largely a characteristic of the platform: the results of different processors and even different models, but of the same family, are always close. But for AM4, the spread of values ​​was large before, but the new processors only increased it. And you can’t just write it off for different instances — both X’s turned out to be worse than the old models, and both X’s were better. That is, in the first, the company clearly squeezed out all the juice, forcing the processors to give their best, operating at the highest possible frequency — a kind of «factory overclocking» (which, however, is not unique on the modern market). But the amount of «run-up» is probably related to specific instances — to the great horror of the company’s partners, who are forced to focus on the worst cases in final products. And for users, there is nothing good in such instability. Moreover, last year AMD had the opportunity to more or less flexibly sort the crystals, sending the “worst” ones to Ryzen 3 (as a result, our 1300X copy, recall, had an “energy efficiency” of only 1.05 points, which is much worse than all the other tested processors of this architecture) , and the “best” on Ryzen 7 (especially on the most expensive 1800X, which, as we observed in our time, not only worked a little faster than the 1700X, but also consumed a little less). In the same year, the freedom of maneuver was greatly reduced. On the one hand, junior quad-core models now simply make sense to do on completely different crystals. On the other hand, the “best” ones are needed for multi-chip models (Epyc or Ryzen Threadripper), and the “regular” Ryzen 7 also fell in price. Nothing criminal, of course, but that’s it. And it would be nice to see all the processors of the new family have the same “energy efficiency” as the Ryzen 7 2700, or at least close to that.

Total

If in the previous article we had complaints about the new Pinnacle Ridge family in terms of high power consumption, now they can probably be replaced by a complaint about the «lack of stability» of this indicator. On the other hand, it makes the choice of a particular processor more interesting and multivariate than when building a system based on Intel processors, adding some luck factor — which is exactly what many people like: it allows you not to get bored. And if you’re lucky, you’ll also save a lot of money.

And one more small remark concerns the «hole» between the 2400G and 2600 — despite the fact that both processors belong to the Ryzen 5 family, but are very different in terms of functionality and performance. To some extent, the predicted Ryzen 5 2500X will be an intermediate solution, but this quad-core model without graphics and at a price comparable to the 2400G does not look very promising — even despite 16 MiB of cache and «full-width» PCIe 3.0 x16 (recall, that all APUs have only eight PCIe lanes). In the end, the Ryzen 5 2600 also has it — not much more expensive, but with six cores. A year ago, such a distribution of processors by families did not raise any special questions, but now … Maybe it’s time to «devalue» all quad-core models to Ryzen 3 and, for example, Athlon? 🙂

Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 — Destiny 2 with GTX 1660 Ti performance comparison

GTX 1660 Ti with

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Destiny 2

GTX 1660 Ti with

AMD Ryzen 5 2600


Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 5 2600

Multi-Thread Performance

15033 Pts

13503 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2011 Pts

2006

2239

Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in Destiny 2 using GTX 1660 Ti — CPU performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 5 2600


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

119. 4 FPS

1080p

116.5 FPS

1440p

102.4 FPS

1440p

100.0 FPS

2160p

51.6 FPS

2160p

50.4 FPS

w1440p

82.4 FPS

w1440p

80.4 FPS

High quality
Approval Frames per second
1080p

182.8 FPS

1080p

179.1 FPS

1440p

160.7 FPS

1440p

157.6 FPS

2160p

89.8 FPS

2160p

88.0 FPS

w1440p

133. 8 FPS

w1440p

131.1 FPS

Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

246.3 FPS

1080p

241.7 FPS

1440p

219.1 FPS

1440p

215.1 FPS

2160p

128.1 FPS

2160p

125.7 FPS

w1440p

185.2 FPS

w1440p

181.7 FPS

Low quality
Resolution FPS
1080p

373.2 FPS

1080p

367.0 FPS

1440p

335. 8 FPS

1440p

330.3 FPS

2160p

204.6 FPS

2160p

201.0 FPS

w1440p

288.1 FPS

w1440p

283.1 FPS

Ryzen 7 2700
  • Ryzen 7 2700 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
  • Ryzen 7 2700 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Ryzen 5 2600
  • In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with a higher number of cores and a lower core frequency.

Compare Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 specifications

Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Architecture
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600
Codename Zen Zen
Generation Ryzen 7
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Ryzen 5
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# YD2700BBM88AF YD2600BBM6IAF
Production Status Active Active
Released Apr 2018 Apr 2018
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cache
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600
Cache L1 96K (per core) 96K (per core)
Cache L2 512K (per core) 512K (per core)
Cache L3 16MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cores
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600
# of Cores 8 6
# of Threads 16 12
Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
SMP # CPUs 1 1
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Features
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Notes
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600
This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3. 2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Multiplier 32.0x 34.0x
Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
TDP 65W 65W
Turbo Clock up to 4.1 GHz up to 3.9 GHz
Voltage variable unknown
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Physical
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 5 2600
Die Size 192 mm² 192 mm²
Foundry GlobalFoundries GlobalFoundries
Package µOPGA-1331 µOPGA-1331
Process Size 12 nm 12 nm
Socket AMD Socket AM4 AMD Socket AM4
Transistors 4800 million 4800 million
tCaseMax unknown unknown

Share your comments 0

Compare Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed ​​

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs.

Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 3.90 GHz base 3.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to CPU socket AM4 This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on a single chip, supports 2 to support DDR4-2933 RAM and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 20. Tjunction is kept below 95°C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) architecture is advanced beyond 12 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q2/2018

Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i5-10400F runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.30 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to LGA 1200 CPU socket This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, the Comet Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2020

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i5-10400F

Compare Details

Frequency 2. 90 GHz
6 Cores 6
3.90GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.30 GHz
3.70GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.00 GHz
Yes Hyper Threading Yes
Yes Overclocking No.
normal Basic architecture normal
no iGPU GPU no iGPU
no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
12nm Technology 14nm
no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
DirectX Version
Max. displays
DDR4-2933 memory size DDR4-2666
2 Memory channels 2
Maximum memory
Yes ECC No.
L2 Cache
16.00MB L3 Cache 12.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
20 PCIe lanes 16
12nm Technology 14nm
AM4 Connector LGA 1200
65 W TDP 65W
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2018 Release date Q2/2020

Show more details

Show more details

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Blender 2.

81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019of the year. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only be computed efficiently using either a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU).