AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?
52points
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
51points
Intel Core i7-4790K
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-4790K
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 27.5% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.4GHzvs4 x 4GHz - 1333MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs1600MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12vs8 - 20.96°C higher maximum operating temperature?
95°Cvs74.04°C - 10nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs22nm - 2MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs1MB - 1.63x higher PassMark result?
13207vs8089 - 23W lower TDP?
65Wvs88W
Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600?
- 0.
5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.4GHzvs3.9GHz - Has integrated graphics?
- 10.2% higher PassMark result (single)?
2484vs2254 - 9.89% higher Cinebench R20 (single) result?
411vs374 - 10.56% higher single-core Geekbench 5 result?
1068vs966
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-4930K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i3-10100F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel Core i3-10100F
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
4 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
10.
0/10
4 User reviews
Intel Core i7-4790K
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-4790K
9.5/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
4 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
4 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
4 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
4 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.4GHz
4 x 4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.9GHz
4.4GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2.67MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
295.1seconds
423.2seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
1320.7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
124%
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
100%
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
107%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
156%
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 56% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-4790K |
| 7% higher single threaded performance. |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD Ryzen 5 2600. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SMT | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 |
||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| HTT | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
| Boost 2.0 | ||||
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen+ | vs | Intel_Haswell | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Zen | vs | Haswell | |
| Release Date | Mar 2018 | vs | May 2014 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 12 | vs | 8 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Intel HD 4600 |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 16384 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 1150 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | ||
| Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 177mm² | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 4000 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 3900 MHz | vs | 4400 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 88 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
4290 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
4928 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
27376 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
21504 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 — Red Dead Redemption 2 with R9 390 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
R9 390 with
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.
00GHz
Red Dead Redemption 2
R9 390 with
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
i7-4790K
Ryzen 5 2600
Multi-Thread Performance
11183 Pts
13503 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2530 Pts
2008 Pts
Red Dead Redemption 2
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 in Red Dead Redemption 2 using R9 390 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-4790K
Ryzen 5 2600
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
27.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
24.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
22.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
19.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
14.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
12.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
19.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
17. |
2 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
51.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
46.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
43.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
39.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
28.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
26.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
38.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
34.7 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
75.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
69.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
64.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
58.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
43.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
39.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
57. |
| w1440p |
52.1 FPS |
4 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
124.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
113.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
106.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
97.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
73.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
67.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
95.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
87.1 FPS |
i7-4790K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i7-4790K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present.
It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 2600
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 specifications
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Architecture
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Haswell | Zen |
| Generation | Core i7 (Haswell) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | YD2600BBM6IAF |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | May 2014 | Apr 2018 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cache
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cores
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Features
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.0x | 34.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 88 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.4 GHz | up to 3.9 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Physical
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | 177 mm² | 192 mm² |
| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | 1400 million | 4800 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share Your Comments 93
Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on one side and the Intel Core i7-4790K on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-4790K | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Devil’s Canyon | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 2000 | Core i7-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | YD2600BBM6IAF | BX80646I74790K, CM8064601710501, SR219 |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q2 2014 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,4 GHz | 4,0 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 4,4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 88 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1250 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 74°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 438 | 473 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 3. 542 |
2.444 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 161 | 173 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.384 | 836 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.022 | 964 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 8.126 | 5.090 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.243 | 2.459 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 13.215 | 8.047 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.441 | 4.928 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
20. 954 |
15.801 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
267,1 GFLOPS | 267,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
322 pts / W | 180 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-4790K is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
438 3.542 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
473 2.444 |
In single core, the difference is -7%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
161 1.384 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
173 836 |
In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 66%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
1.022 8.126 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
964 5.090 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 60%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
2.243 13.215 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
2.459 8.047 |
In single core, the difference is -9%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 64%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.441 20.954 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
4.928 15.801 |
In single core, the difference is -10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.570 20.707 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
5.354 17.597 |
In single core, the difference is -15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
5.836 19.848 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.361 13.960 |
In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 42%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.  21319.017 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K |
4.923 16.431 |
In single core, the difference is -14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-4790K AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i7-4790Intel Core i7-4790S
Intel Core i7-4790K vs.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Intel Core i7-4790K
The Intel Core i7-4790K operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 88 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Devils Canyon S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM.
The product was launched on Q4/2019
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Compare Detail
| 4.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.60 GHz |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.40 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
GPU | no iGPU |
| 1.25 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 22 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
| 1.25 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 11.1 | DirectX Version | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| Memory | DDR4-2666 | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
8. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
| LGA 1150 | Socket | AM4 |
| 88 W | TDP | 65 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q2/2014 | Release date | Q4/2019 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.
5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.
The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| Intel Core i7-4790K | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF | |
| 88 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
i7 4790K vs i7 6700K
Read this article at https://www.
pugetsystems.com/guides/641
Written on August 5, 2015 by Matt Bach
Share:
Always look at the date when you read a hardware article. Some of the content in this article is most likely out of date, as it was written on August 5, 2015. For newer information, see our more recent articles.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- CPU Specifications
- Test Setup
- Thermal Output
- Power Draw
- CPU Performance — Unigine Heaven Pro 4.0
- CPU Performance — PCMark 8 Professional
- CPU Performance — Geekbench 3
- CPU Performance — Cinebench R15
- CPU Performance — POV-RAY / Linpack
- CPU Performance — Lightroom CC
- CPU Performance — Photoshop CC
- CPU Performance — Premiere Pro CC
- Conclusion
Introduction
If you are not familiar with Intel’s CPU launch cycles, they operate on a «Tick-Tock» schedule that designates whether a new CPU launch either has a die shrink (with a smaller manufacturing process) or a completely new microarchitecture. Skylake-S is a «Tock» which means that it uses a new microarchitecture which in turn means a different physical socket from the previous generation. Because of the new socket, if you want to use a Skylake-S CPU you will require a new motherboard (with a compatible chipset). At launch, the only chipset available is the Intel Z170 although more models as expected in the future.
Skylake-S introduces a number of changes compared to Haswell that makes it fairly attractive as a platform. Probably the biggest improvement is that both the CPU and Z170 chipset now support DDR4-2133 RAM. DDR4 is still more expensive than DDR3 but it is slightly faster and should allow for twice the density. This means that instead of being limited to 32GB of RAM, with Skylake-S you can now have 64GB of RAM. There are also a number of smaller changes in the Z170 chipset (more information can be found in our Z97 vs Z170: What is the Difference? article) but none are quite as significant as the move to DDR4.
In this article we want to go over the new Core i7 6700K CPU and look at how it is different from the Core i7 4790K. To do this, we will first examine the specifications of Haswell and Skylake-S CPUs in general then run a wide variety of benchmarks to find out what applications benefit from the move to DDR4 RAM and the other architecture changes.
If you do not want to read this entire article, we suggest reading through the CPU Specifications below then skipping to the Conclusion section.
CPU Specifications
Since only the K-series CPUs have been launched so far, there are some gaps in what we officially know about the specifications for all the Skylake-S CPUs. However, we can make a few reasonable assumptions about the non K-series CPUs such as all i5/i7 CPUs having 4 cores and only the i7 CPUs having Hyperthreading support. Other specifications like the TDP (or thermal output) we cannot make a reasonable assumption so we will simply leave those blank for now.
In addition, we are only going to compare the i5 and i7 CPUs. The Core i3 CPUs are simply so different in terms of specs that it is really better to think of them as an entirely different class of CPUs altogether.
| Haswell i5/i7 | Skylake-S i5/i7 | |
| Socket: | 1150 | 1151 |
| Manufacturing Process: | 22nm | 14nm |
| Cores: | 4 | 4 |
| Hyperthreading: | i7 only | i7 only |
| Smart Cache: | 6MB (i5) 8MB (i7) |
6MB (i5) 8MB (i7) |
| Bus Type: | DMI 2.0 (5GT/s) | DMI 3.0 (8GT/s) |
| Integrated Graphics: | HD Graphics 4600 | HD Graphics 530 |
| TDP: | 84 W (Standard i5/i7) 88 W (K-series i5/i7) |
? (Standard i5/i7) 95 W (K-series i5/i7) |
| Memory Type: | DDR3/DDR3L 1333/1600 | DDR4 2133 / DDR3L 1600 |
| Max Memory: | 32GB | 64GB |
As you can see, there is quite a bit different in the new Skylake-S CPUs.
Starting from the top, the major changes are:
- New Socket 1151 — Although the socket name is only one number higher than the Haswell Socket 1150, these two sockets are not cross-compatible. In other words, you cannot use a Haswell CPU in a socket 1151 motherboard or a Skylake-S CPU in a socket 1150 motherboard. However, the heatsink mounting is the same so any socket 1150 (or socket 1155/1156 for that matter) heatsink will work just fine on socket 1151.
- Smaller manufacturing process (14nm) — Technically, the Broadwell CPUs were Intel’s first 14nm CPUs, but Intel only ever released a handful of desktop Broadwell CPUs and they were honestly very underwhelming. However, this does mean that this manufacturing process is already a bit established which should help with both supply and reliability.
- Faster connection between the CPU and motherboard — With Skylake-S, the bus connection between the CPU and motherboard has been improved to DMI 3.
0 which is theoretically about 40% faster than DMI 2.0. While this means that the CPU can communicate with the chipset (and all the USB, LAN, SATA, etc. ports that go through the chipset) faster, the main advantage it brings is simply in being able to put more devices on the chipset without creating a bottleneck. This is the main reason why the Z170 chipset has 20 PCI-E 3.0 lanes versus the 8 PCI-E 2.0 lanes that are on Z97. More information on this is available in our Z97 vs Z170: What is the Difference? article. - Improved integrated graphics — If you don’t need a discrete video card, the Skylake-S CPUs have much improved onboard graphics compared to Haswell. 530 may be a smaller number than 4600, but we saw more than a 25% increase in 3D performance when using the onboard graphics. In addition, the HD Graphics 530 supports newer feature sets such as DX12.
- Higher TDP for K-series CPUs — While we don’t know yet what the TDP will be for the standard Skylake-S CPUs, we do know that the K-series are rated to need 7W more than the Haswell K-series CPUs.
This higher power draw should result in hotter CPU temperatures, although as we will show later we actually found that Skylake-S CPUs actually run cooler than Haswell CPUs. We have a few theories as to why which you can find in the Thermal Output section of this article. - DDR4 support — Probably one of the biggest changes in Skylake-S is the addition of DDR4 support. DDR4 memory is slightly faster and uses less power than DDR3, but probably the biggest advantage to DDR4 is that it support twice the capacity (or density) as DDR3. So while both Haswell and Skylake-S can only support four physical sticks of RAM, Skylake-S supports twice the amount of memory as Haswell (64GB vs 32GB).
Test Setup
In order to get an accurate comparison between Haswell and Skylake-S, we decided to test the top CPU from each family. The Core i7 4790K and the Core i7 6700K are very similar in terms of specifications although there are a few small differences:
| Core i7 4790K | Core i7-6700K | |
| Cores(Threads): | 4(8) | 4(8) |
| Base Frequency: | 4. 0 GHz |
4.0 GHz |
| Single Core Turbo Frequency: | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| All-Core Turbo Frequency: | 4.2 GHz | 4.0 GHz |
| Smart Cache: | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Integrated Graphics: | HD Graphics 4600 | Graphics 530 |
| TDP: | 88 W | 95 W |
Technically, the Core i7 4790K Haswell CPU is faster in terms of frequency with a maximum Turbo frequency of either 4.4 or 4.2 GHz depending on if you only have a single core or all the cores active. This is only .2 GHz higher than the Core i7 6700K CPU but it is enough that in terms of frequency the i7 4790K should be about 4.5% faster than the i7 6700K. However, the addition of DDR4 support and other small changes to the CPU architecture (such as the smaller manufacturing process and DMI 3.0) may be enough to make the i7 6700K faster than its predecessor.
For the rest of our test systems, we used the following hardware:
This is a pretty standard setup that we use for a lot of our testing and should be great for showing the performance, thermal, and power draw differences between the two CPUs. You will notice, however, that we did not use the freshly launched Windows 10 as our test OS. We actually started our testing on Windows 10, but we saw some very strange performance inconsistencies (which we are attributing to minor software and driver bugs) that made us revert to the older, more established Windows 8.1 operating system.
We will be doing limited testing using the onboard graphics to see how it performs but for the majority of our testing we will be using a GeForce GTX 980. However, we did find that for CPU intensive tasks using onboard graphics did not significantly change the performance, temperature, or power draw of the CPU.
Thermal Output
To start our testing, we decided to see how much hotter (or cooler) the i7 6700K run compared to the i7 4790K.
We performed this testing in two ways: once with the CPU fan set to run at 100% and once with it set to Asus’ Standard QFan profile which ramps the fan based on temperature.
Even though the i7 6700K is rated to use more power than the i7 4790K, we saw anywhere from a three to seven degree drop in temperature depending on the benchmark we ran. Honestly, this is exactly the opposite of what we expected. There has been some changes to how power is supplied to the CPU which may be what is causing the lower temperature (such as the majority of the voltage regulation being moved from the CPU onto the motherboard) but no matter the reason this is a great surprise.
Due to the lower temperature, we also saw a small — but measurable — drop in the CPU fan speed when using QFan. It was only a drop of 50-100 RPM, but if you want a silent system like our Serenity or Serenity Pro that small drop in fan speed is actually fairly significant.
Power Draw
Since the i7 6700K runs significantly cooler than the i7 4790K you may expect power draw to be lower as well but we found that not to be the case in all situations.
Power draw at idle and during POV-Ray was indeed 4-10 watts lower but Prime95 was actually 2 watts higher. In 3D graphics such as Unigine Heaven, we saw lower power draw when using the GeForce GTX 980, but a very large 15 watt increase when using onboard graphics.
Overall, it appears that Skylake-S has a lower power draw compared to Haswell in most situations unless you are utilizing the onboard graphics. In that case, power draw can be significantly higher during 3D applications.
CPU Performance — Unigine Heaven Pro 4.0
To start our performance comparison we are going to begin with Unigine Heaven Pro. Every game is different so if you are concerned about performance on a specific title you should try to find a benchmark for that title, but we have found Unigine Heaven Pro to be a great indicator of 3D graphical performance.
With a GeForce GTX 980 4GB video card, we saw absolutely no difference in performance between the i7 6700K and the i7 4790K. Most modern games are GPU limited, however, so this does not really mean that neither CPU is better — simply that both CPUs are fast enough to not be the bottleneck in our test system.
When we switched to onboard graphics, however, we saw over a 25% increase in performance. There are a number of different reasons for this, but it is mainly due to the new graphics architecture (HD 530 versus HD 4000) and the move to DDR4 memory. Since onboard graphics uses the system RAM instead of dedicated VRAM like you would find on a video card, using the faster DDR4 RAM results in an increase in onboard graphics performance.
If nothing else, this benchmark shows that onboard graphics is continuing to get better and better. It is still nowhere near the performance of most video cards, but if you were considering purchasing a <$100 video card to pair with Skylake-S you may opt to simply use onboard graphics instead.
CPU Performance — PCMark 8 Professional
PCMark is one of the standard benchmarks that is used in most reviews, but you need to keep in mind that no matter how realistic it tries to be, it is still a synthetic benchmark. With that said, PCMark shows some of the least exciting results from any of our testing.
We did still see a small increase in performance with the i7 6700K, but never higher than a tiny .9% increase.
CPU Performance — Geekbench 3
Geekbench 3 is another synthetic benchmark, although it focuses more on CPU-intensive benchmarks rather than full-system benchmarks. Overall, Geekbench 3 showed an increase in performance of almost 5% with the i7 6700K which is fairly good.
For the individual categories, integer performance saw about a 5% increase in performance while floating point performance only saw about a 3% increase. Memory performance, however, saw a huge 22.2% increase due to the move to DDR4 memory. Most applications are not limited by the speed of your memory, however, so don’t expect to see a 20% increase in performance except in rare situations.
One interesting thing we found with Geekbench is that the single core integer and floating point performance of the i7 6700K was actually worse than the i7 4790K. It was not until we looked at the multi core benchmark results that we saw an increase in performance.
This suggests that the i7 6700K is not actually any faster than the i7 4790K per clock, but is simply more efficient at multi-threading which results in higher performance in most applications.
CPU Performance — Cinebench R15
Similar to Geekbench, we saw very little increase in performance when only using a single core in CineBench R15. However, even with all the CPU cores active we only say about a 1% increase in performance which is similar to what we saw in PCMark 8. Interestingly, we actually saw about a 1.5% decrease in performance during the OpenGL portion of Cinebench R15. This isn’t a very large decrease but it is outside of what we consider to be our margin of error.
CPU Performance — POV-RAY / Linpack
For the last of our synthetic benchmarks we ran POV-Ray and Linpack. Both of these benchmarks are widely used in the scientific community and are usually very good at showing raw CPU performance.
Starting with POV-RAY we saw a very large 7.
7% increase in performance compared to the i7 4790K. This is a significant increase in performance and is an indicator that ray tracing in general should be much better with the i7 6700K.
Linpack, however, is a bit of an aberration and to be honest we almost didn’t include it because we believe there to be a problem currently between Linpack and Skylake-S. Simply put, we saw a 20% drop in performance with the i7-6700K. We are still investigating why the i7 6700K is giving such low performance (we should be seeing at least 205 GFLOPs, not 173 GFLOPs) but for now all we can say is that the i7 6700K is giving very low performance in Linpack.
Update: A newer version of Linpack (11.3) fixes the low performance we saw in Linpack. Using the newer version we are now seeing a result of ~240 GFLOPs for the 6700K. This makes the 6700K about 12.5% faster than the 4790K rather than 20% slower.
CPU Performance — Lightroom CC
Starting off our real-world benchmarks we tested a number of actions in Lightroom CC 2015.
If you read our recent
Adobe Lightroom CC/6 CPU Multi-threading Performance article these actions will be very familiar to you. For importing images, generating smart or 1:1 previews, and converting the images to DNG we saw about a 1.5-2% increase in performance. This isn’t great, but it is still noteworthy. Where the i7-6700K really impressed us was when it came to exporting images where we saw a 15% increase in performance. This seemed way too high at first, but we tested and re-tested it and we are confident that the i7 6700K can indeed export images in Lightroom 15% faster than the i7 4790K.
In addition to basic image handling in Lightroom, we also tested the creation of HDR and panorama images. Neither was quite as exciting as the «Export as JPG» results, but we still saw a 1.7% increase in performance while creating panorama images and a 3.4% increase in performance when creating HDR images.
CPU Performance — Photoshop CC
Photoshop saw some of the largest increases in performance out of all the software we tested. Overall, we saw about a 8.5% increase in performance although the increase for each effect ranged from just .8% (Smart Blur) to 16.7% (Motion Blur). Even simple things like image resizing and rotation saw over a 7% increase in performance.
All-in-all, if you are a heavy Photoshop user Skylake is a very attractive platform. Not only does the i7 6700K have significant performance improvements over the i7 4790K, but the move to DDR4 RAM means that you do not need to use the slower (for Photoshop at least) socket 2011 CPUs if you need more than 32GB of system RAM.
CPU Performance — Premiere Pro CC
Unlike Lightroom and Photoshop where we developed our own benchmark scripts, for Premiere we used the popular PPBM9 benchmark. The only change we made was to run a modified version of the MPEG2 Hardware timeline where we copied and pasted the test clip three times to make the render three times as long.
Overall, the only two places we saw a significant increase in performance was with MPEG2 software encoding and H.
264 encoding. Honestly, you should always be using MPEG2 hardware encoding (which uses the GPU) so the 7% improvement to MPEG2 software encoding doesn’t mean much. The 6% increase in H.264 encoding, however, is very important as H.264 is one of the most popular codecs used today.
Most professional Premiere Pro uses will likely still want to use a socket 2011 CPU due to the higher core counts, but if you are only using Premiere Pro as a hobby or only use it intermittently, the 6% improvement in H.264 encoding time with the i7 6700K is very significant.
Conclusion
To summarize this article, here is what we found in terms of temperature, power draw, and performance of the i7 6700K compared to the i7 4790K:
- Power Draw — in most situations, the i7 6700K uses about 4-10 less watts than the i7 4790K. The main exception is if you are using the onboard graphics — in which case expect a 10-12W increase in power draw
- Temperature — Depending on what you are doing, the i7 6700K should run about 4-7 ºC cooler than the i7-4790K.
Even when using onboard graphics (where we saw a 10W higher system power draw) the i7 6700K was still about 3 ºC cooler than the i7 4790K. - Performance — In most cases, the performance of the i7 6700K compared to the i7 4790K was either identical or significantly better. We did have a few times that we saw a drop in performance (most noteably a 20% decrease in Linpack) but overall Skylake-S is better than Haswell.
| i7 6700K vs i7 4790K Performance Summary | |
| Unigine Heaven Pro 4.0 | No change with discrete GPU, >25% faster with onboard graphics. |
| PCMark 8 Pro | .5-1% increase in performance. |
| Geekbench 3 | 5% increase in multi-core performance. |
| Cinebench R15 | 1% increase in CPU performance, 1. 5% decrease in GPU performance. |
| POV-Ray | 7.7% increase in performance. |
| Linpack | 12.5% increase in performance. *Updated using Linpack 11.3 |
| Lightroom CC 2015 | 1.5-2% increase in most image handling tasks, but a huge 15% increase in image export performance. ~2-3% increase in HDR/Panorama image creation performance. |
| Photoshop CC 2015 | 8.5% increase in overall performance. Varies anywhere from .8% to 16.7% depending on the effect. |
| Premiere Pro CC 2015 | 6% increase in H.264 encoding performance, marginal increase in MPEG2 encoding performance. |
In most situations, the i7 6700K should be anywhere from 1% to 10% faster than the i7 4790K. We saw some of the most significant performance improvements in Lightroom and Photoshop.
Most of the Lightroom actions we tested saw a small 1.5-3% increase in performance, but the 15% increase in performance when exporting images is very significant. In Photoshop, some of the effects we tested saw even greater performance improvements — up to 16.7 percent! Even better, the move to DDR4 RAM means that you do not need to use the slower (for Photoshop at least) socket 2011 CPUs if you need more than 32GB of system RAM since the Skylake-S platform supports up to 64GB of RAM.
Overall, Skylake-S as a platform is very, very good. Most of the specification changes are pretty subtle (with the exception of the move to DDR4) but we were impressed with the lower power draw and temperature of the i7 6700K compared to the i7 4790K. Unless you are a professional Photoshop or Lightroom user, the performance improvements likely won’t merit upgrading from Haswell to Skylake-S, but if you are in the market for a new system we see little reason to not use Skylake-S.
Probably the worst thing about Skylake-S is that Intel only has two CPUs (the high-end unlocked i5 6600K and i7 6700K) and one chipset (Z170) available at launch.
That is expected to change in the near future but if you want to be an early adopter your choices will be limited to only the high-end options.
Tags: Skylake-S, Haswell, i7 4790K, i7 6700K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?
52 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
51 Ballla
Intel Core i7-4790k
Winter when comparing
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD RYZEN 5 2600 9000 Is Ryzen 5 2600 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 27.5% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.4GHz vs 4 x 4GHz - 1333MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 1600MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - 20.96°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
95°C vs 74.04°C - Are 10nm smaller semiconductors?
12nm vs 22nm - 2MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 1MB - 1.
63x higher PassMark score?
13207 vs 8089 - 23W below TDP?
65W vs 88W
- 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.4GHz vs 3.9GHz - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 10.2% higher PassMark score (single)?
2484 vs 2254 - 9.89% better than Cinebench R20 (single core)?
411 vs 374 - 10.56% higher Geekbench 5 single core result?
1068 vs 966
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
Intel Core I5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS 9000) Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i7-4930k
AMD RYOT RYOT RYOS Core i7-4790K
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
Intel Core i5-9400f
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core I3-9100f 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 5 3400g
9000 INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL INTEL Intel Core.
vs
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 26 26.000
AMD Ryzen 5 22
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i7-4790k
/10
2 Reviews of Users
Functions
The cost and quality ratio
10.0 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 4 VOTES
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
Games
10.0 /10
4 Votes
/10
2 Votes
245 9.5
/10
2 Votes
Reliability
10.0 /10
4 VOTES
/10
2 VOTES
10.0 9000 4 VOTO 9000 4 VOTES 10.0 /10
2 votes
Performance
1.cpu speed
6 x 3.4GHz
4 x 4GHz processors).
It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.9GHz
4.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2.67MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM.
New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor.
(Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Result Cinebench R20 (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender test result (bmw27)
295.1seconds
423.2seconds
The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
1320.
7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. TrustZone enabled
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i7-4790K: What is the difference?
44points
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
51 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-4790K
Winter with
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 5 2600x
Intel Core i7-4790K
why AMD Ryzen 5 2600x is better 4790K?
- 35% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.6GHz vs 4 x 4GHz - 1333MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 1600MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - Smaller 10nm semiconductors?
12nm vs 22nm - 2MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 1MB - 1.
74x higher PassMark score?
14087 vs 8089 - 8MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 8MB - 320KB more L1 cache?
576KB vs 256KB
Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X?
- 7W below TDP?
88W vs 95W - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 4 higher hour multiplier?
40 vs 36 - Has F16C?
- Has FMA3?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690k
AMD RYZEN 5 2600X
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
Intel Core i7-4790k
AMD Ryzen 5 26,0004 AMD RyZen AMD RYZEN 5 2600
Intel Core i7-47903
VS
Intel Core i7-4930K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600x
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Intel Core i7-4790K 9000 VS 5 3600
AMD RYZEN 5 2600X
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i3-9100f
AMD Ryzen 5 2600x
VS 9000 Ryzen 5000 AMD RYZEN Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD RYZEN 5 2600X
VS
Intel Core i7-9700K
Intel Core I7-4790K
9000
AMD RyZen 5 2600X
VS
Intel Core i3-9100f
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600x
VS
9000 I AMD Ryzen 5 3500x 9000 9 ° Creyzen 5 3500x 9000.
VS
Intel Core i3-10100F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600x
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600h
Intel Core i7-4790k
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x 9002
0021
General rating
AMD RYZEN 5 2600X
2 Reviews of users
AMD RYZEN 5 2600X
/10
2 Reviews of users
9000 Core -4790k
9.5 /10
2 Reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
/10
2 VOTES
9.5 /10
2 Votes
Games
/10
2 VOTES
/10
2 VOTES 9000 9.5 /10
2 Votes
Reliability
/10
2 Votes
/10
003
2 Votes
10.0 /10
2 Votes
performance
1. Skur -old processor
6 x 3.6GHZ
4 x 4GHZ 9000 , considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.25GHz
4.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2.67MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.
Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Result Cinebench R20 (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
423.2seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
1320.7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4th SSE version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.
Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
8. Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPU is better?
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 — Apex Legends with RTX 2060 performance comparison
RTX 2060 with
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Apex Legends
RTX 2060 with
Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz
Ryzen 5 2600
i7-4790
Multi-Thread Performance
13503 Pts
9989 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2008 Pts
2283 Pts
Apex Legends
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 in Apex Legends using RTX 2060 — CPU performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, Ultrawide, 1440 4K
Ryzen 5 2600
i7-4790
Ultra quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
99. |
| 1080p |
104.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
75.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
79.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
39.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
41.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
61.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
64.6 FPS |
4 FPS High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
156.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
163.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
124.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
129.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
71.9FPS |
| 2160p |
74.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
104. |
| w1440p |
108.8 FPS |
5 FPS Medium quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
214.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
222.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
172.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
179.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
104.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
107.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
147.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
153.1 FPS |
Poor quality
| Approval | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
328.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
340.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
270. |
| 1440p |
279.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
168.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
174.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
233.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
241.6 FPS |
3 FPS Ryzen 5 2600
- Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher level 2 cache. The data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR
- RAM Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher level 3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- Ryzen 5 2600 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- Ryzen 5 2600 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- Ryzen 5 2600 The Ryzen 5 2600 is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
- Ryzen 5 2600 The Ryzen 5 2600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
i7-4790
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The i7-4790 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware.
Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 Architecture
| Ryzen 5 2600 | i7-4790 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Zen | Haswell |
| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
Core i7 (Haswell) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Part# | YD2600BBM6IAF | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Apr 2018 | May 2014 |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 Cache
| Ryzen 5 2600 | i7-4790 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 16MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 Cores
| Ryzen 5 2600 | i7-4790 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 4 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Intel HD 4600 |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 Features
| Ryzen 5 2600 | i7-4790 | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.  1SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 vPro Boost 2.0 |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 Notes
| Ryzen 5 2600 | i7-4790 |
|---|
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 Performance
| Ryzen 5 2600 | i7-4790 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 34.0x | 36.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 65W | 84W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 3.9 GHz | up to 4 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 Physical
| Ryzen 5 2600 | i7-4790 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | 192 mm² | 177 mm² |
| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 22 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Transistors | 4800 million | 1400 million |
| tCaseMax | unknown | 72°C |
Share your comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-4790 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need for Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 — Assassin’s Creed Odyssey vs R9 390X performance comparison
R9 390X with
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.
00GHz
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
R9 390X with
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
i7-4790K
Ryzen 5 2600
Multi-Thread Performance
11183 Pts
13503 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2530 Pts
2008 Pts
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Assassin’s Creed Odyssey using R9 390X — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i7-4790K
Ryzen 5 2600
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
34.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
30.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
27.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
24.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
19.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
16. |
| w1440p |
24.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
21.9 FPS |
9 FPS High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
62.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
56.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
51.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
46.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
37.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
34.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
47.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
42.8 FPS |
Medium quality
| Approval | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
91.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
83. |
| 1440p |
75.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
69.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
56.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
51.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
70.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
63.7 FPS |
3 FPS Low quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
149.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
136.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
124.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
113.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
94.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
85.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
115.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
105. |
6 FPS i7-4790K
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The i7-4790K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Ryzen 5 2600
- Ryzen 5 2600 has higher level 2 cache. Data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for very slow DDR 9 RAM0029
- Ryzen 5 2600 has higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- Ryzen 5 2600 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- Ryzen 5 2600 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- Ryzen 5 2600 The Ryzen 5 2600 is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
- Ryzen 5 2600 The Ryzen 5 2600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
Compare i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 specifications
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Architecture
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Haswell | Zen |
| Generation | Core i7 (Haswell) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | YD2600BBM6IAF |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | May 2014 | Apr 2018 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cache
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cores
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | N/A |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Features
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.0x | 34.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 88 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.4 GHz | up to 3.9 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
i7-4790K vs Ryzen 5 2600 Physical
| i7-4790K | Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | 177 mm² | 192 mm² |
| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | 1400 million | 4800 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share your comments 93
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need for Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Civilization: Beyond Earth
2014
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
Far Cry 4
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Testing Ryzen 5 1600/2600/2600X and Ryzen 7 2700/2700X Processors vs New AMD and Intel
Models
Testing low-cost quad-core AMD Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 3 3300X
processors While testing the new Ryzen 3 processors in May, we mentioned that the expansion of the new generation of processors began a year ago actually outside the mainstream segment — the youngest was the Ryzen 5 3600 with a recommended price of $199, i.
e., on the verge of the usual framework. And in many respects this was done in order not to interfere with the sale of stocks of processors of previous generations. And the Ryzen 5 2600 continued to ship at all until the end of 2019 — and was in considerable demand. As well as its cheaper «colleagues», the good idea to purchase as many as eight (albeit old) cores for the price of only six (albeit new ones) found many adherents. The six-core «old» models were out of competition.
They are still on sale. Are they worth attention? The question is subjective. We can also test these models according to the current testing methodology — and compare with the new products not only from AMD, but also from Intel. You never know — suddenly the old horse not only does not spoil the furrow, but also plows deep.
Test participants
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kernel name | Summit Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Production technology | 14 nm | 12 nm | 12 nm | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3. 2/3.6 |
3.4/3.9 | 3.6/4.2 | 3.2/4.1 | 3.7/4.3 |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/12 | 6/12 | 6/12 | 8/16 | 8/16 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 384/192 | 384/192 | 384/192 | 512/256 | 512/256 |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×512 | 6×512 | 6×512 | 8×512 | 8×512 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-2666 | 2×DDR4-2933 | 2×DDR4-2933 | 2×DDR4-2933 | 2×DDR4-2933 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 65 | 95 | 65 | 105 |
| Number of PCIe 3.0 lanes | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Integrated GPU | no | no | no | no | no |
The main characters are the four 2000 series, to which we have added the slowest six-core first generation. In combination, it is the slowest Ryzen 5 with six cores at all — while the 2600X is the fastest until last year. And the two Ryzen 7s don’t need any special introduction either.
| AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | AMD Ryzen 5 3500 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kernel name | Matisse | Matisse | Matisse | Matisse |
| Production technology | 7/12 nm | 7/12 nm | 7/12 nm | 7/12 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3.6/3.9 | 3.6/4.1 | 3.6/4.2 | 3.9/4.5 |
| Number of cores/threads | 4/8 | 6/6 | 6/12 | 8/16 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 128/128 | 192/192 | 192/192 | 256/256 |
| L2 cache, KB | 4×512 | 6×512 | 6×512 | 8×512 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 16 | 16 | 32 | 32 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-3200 | 2×DDR4-3200 | 2×DDR4-3200 | 2×DDR4-3200 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 65 | 65 | 105 |
| Number of PCIe 4. |
20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Integrated GPU | no | no | no | no |
The main «opponents» of this five will be the four of their successors. We need the Ryzen 7 3800X to evaluate the «clean» progress — eight versus eight. Moreover, during this time a change appeared for him, but we did not test the 3800XT on the board with the X470 chipset (for a similar reason, the popular Ryzen 7 3700X also “disappears”), but all the rest — yes. So a perfect equal comparison.
As for the rest of the trio, these are the junior models in their lines. Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 5 3500 do not have the lowest cost among the new products, as they are able to utilize any marriage. And the Ryzen 5 3600 is the current bestseller, able to compete on equal terms with the entire Ryzen 2000 family. What we already know — but it’s worth checking the situation after the software update.
| Intel Core i5-10400 | Intel Core i5-10600K | Intel Core i7-10700K | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kernel name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake | Comet Lake |
| Production technology | 14 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 2. |
4.1/4.8 | 3.8/5.1 |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/12 | 6/12 9119four | 8/16 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 192/192 | 192/192 | 256/256 |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×256 | 6×256 | 8×256 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 12 | 12 | 16 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-2666 | 2×DDR4-2933 | 2×DDR4-2933 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 125 | 125 |
| Number of PCIe 3.0 lanes | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
The three modern Intel models do not match AMD’s solutions too much in terms of prices, but there are six and eight cores — approximately corresponding to the same Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 3800X in terms of performance. And also the new-old Core i5-10400: the youngest in the line for the LGA1200 and using only the old six-core crystals, similar to Coffee Lake in 2017. The main thing from a consumer point of view, however, is not this — but prices: 10400 and its brother with a blocked GPU 10400F are actually the cheapest six-core processors for the new platform. Recommended prices are generally in the region of $150-$180, real retail prices are currently noticeably higher — but much lower than those of the 10600K and are already comparable to the Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 2700X. As the process ends, the «cream skimming» should drop closer to the recommended ones, but we can prepare for this now.
| Intel Core i5-8500 | Intel Core i5-9600K | Intel Core i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kernel name | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake Refresh | Coffee Lake Refresh |
| Production technology | 14 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3. |
3.7/4.6 | 3.6/4.9 |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/6 | 6/6 | 8/8 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 192/192 | 192/192 | 256/256 |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×256 | 6×256 | 8×256 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 9 | 9 | 12 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-2666 | 2×DDR4-2666 | 2×DDR4-2666 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 95 | 95 |
| Number of PCIe 3.0 lanes | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
But most of the time, the first and second Ryzen had to compete with the processors for the LGA1151 «second version», so let’s add such a trio. Let’s take the Core i5-8500 as the lower limit — it’s a little slower than the 9400, but it appeared back in the days of the Ryzen 5 1600. In general, it’s also useful.
Test Method
Methodology for testing computer systems of the 2020 sample
The testing methodology is described in detail in a separate article, and the results of all tests are available in a separate table in Microsoft Excel format. Directly in the articles, we use the processed results: normalized with respect to the reference system (Intel Core i5-9600K with 16 GB of memory, an AMD Radeon Vega 56 video card and a SATA SSD — in today’s article it is directly involved) and grouped by computer application areas. Accordingly, all diagrams related to applications have dimensionless scores — so more is always better. And starting from this year, we are finally transferring game tests to an optional status (the reasons for which are discussed in detail in the description of the test methodology), so that only specialized materials will be available for them. In the main lineup there are only a couple of «processor-dependent» games in low resolution and medium quality — synthetic, of course, but conditions close to reality for testing processors are not suitable, since nothing depends on them in such conditions.
iXBT Application Benchmark 2020
A group of applications with good multithreading utilization — but, nevertheless, Ryzen 5 1600 (6C / 12T) turned out to be almost equal not only to Core i5-8500 (6C / 6T), but also to Ryzen 3 3100 ( 4C/8T) and the 2600 is a bit behind the 3500! What has been said more than once — in the overall result, not only the quantity, but also the quality of the cores plays. In the case of Ryzen, it is the last parameter that primarily distinguishes the 3000 family from the previous ones. In turn, the «previous» practically do not differ — within the limits of quantitative differences. Well, then — everything is simple: the once top-end Ryzen 7 2700X in terms of performance corresponds only to the Ryzen 5 3600 — or Core i5-10600K. The competition with Intel, however, is normal — after all, here AMD has always been ahead of the curve, so the same 1600 for the first time «butted» with the Core i5 for the «first version» LGA1151 — just quad-core without Hyper-Threading. Now everything seems to be worse — so the old processors have fallen in price considerably, and the new Intel solutions are still sold at inflated (even compared to the recommended) prices. But the progress in the «own» family is indicative — to compete with the «new» processors, the «old» ones need an extra pair of cores. Otherwise, nothing will work. It is clear that this is not a reason to change the Ryzen 7 of the old series to the new Ryzen 5 — but if it’s too tight, then you can already ask the price of the new Ryzen 7. Or even Ryzen 9without changing the motherboard.
What’s funny, in this group of applications, the «oldies» look more cheerful. So far, in any case, and nothing fundamentally changes: just the top Ryzen 7 somehow managed to break away from the new Core i5 and Ryzen 5, and the slowest of the modern processors we took could not keep up with the Ryzen 5 1600. But it’s clear why — here the physical cores are more weighty than in the previous group. And «quality» is more difficult to kill quantity. Although, we won’t be surprised if this happens over time — it’s enough to improve the optimization for new processors and instructions like AVX2. In the meantime, these programs are more conservative — «very old», but multi-core server processors are also actively used for 3D rendering, so programmers have no incentive to lean too heavily on new technologies.
Back to normal , first. Secondly, in these programs, optimization for the new Ryzen still leaves much to be desired. But again, only the older Ryzen 7 2700X can show something worthwhile — it is at least faster than the Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i5-10400. At what cost this is achieved — we will see in the next part. As for slower models… it’s easy to see that the number of cores is not so important here, but their quality. And intensive, and even extensive — such as clock frequencies.
The case when single-threaded performance generally «steers». And the revolution that happened a year ago is clearly visible — the first Ryzen always acted as boys to beat for Core (even having a head start in the number of cores / computation threads), and the 3000 family took the lead. The roles have changed radically. Moreover, which is also important, you do not need an overly expensive processor to work with photos. But the first two Ryzen lines are not needed by almost regardless of price.
Simple integer code that spreads nicely across independent threads. And once again it is clear that even in such cases, the quality of the nuclei is no less important than their number. The new six from AMD and Intel turn out to be no worse than the eight — «old» AMD or «cut down» (by truncating Hyper-Threading) Intel.
Another similar case, but with its own nuances. Many copies have been broken on the topic that the chiplet design of the new AMD processors is harmful in tasks of this kind, since the memory controller becomes external to the cores — however, this is true only when compared with Core. And even then — at the time of release it did not interfere, because there were enough stocks of other dope to compete with the «ninth» generation. And most importantly, the old Ryzen are even worse in this regard. Therefore, we again see how the budget 3100 directly fights with the six-core Ryzen 5, and the «full» 3600 to smithereens and in half smashes the entire old line.
Again, the situation when optimization for new microarchitectures leaves (so far) much to be desired, and physical cores are very weighty. But once again, this allows old solutions to look good only considering the prices. They have fulfilled their task of «holding out» until the 3000th family — and they can leave.
The general verdict is logical — the old eight-cores are at best equivalent to the new six-cores. So even at the same price, they look like a dubious choice — as software optimization improves, their situation will only get worse. But the six-core Ryzen 5 is interesting to some extent — they are cheap and cover a hole in the wallpaper … more precisely, the gap between the Ryzen 5 3600 and the new Ryzen 3. What is important enough — since, as we can see, Intel targeted this weak spot: the Core i5-10400 (and especially the 10400F without a video core) fill it perfectly both in price and performance. The Ryzen 5 3500/3500X held back the old Core i5s well, but they can’t match the new ones. Therefore, the company will have to solve this problem. Which is technically easy — you just need to slightly drop the prices for the same Ryzen 5 3600. Fortunately, this process has begun slowly: the 3600X has been replaced by 3600XT, which means that the 3600X can drop to $ 200, and the usual 3600 — and lower. After that, everyone will be able to completely forget about the old processors, except for those who already have them.
Power Consumption and Energy Efficiency
We’ve seen more than once how the 2700X far outperformed its «no suffix» sibling, and now it’s clear why. Indeed, AMD tried so hard to add speed to the top processor in the line that they even had to increase the TDP a little from 95 to 105 watts. As a result, of the test participants, it corresponds only to the Core i7-10700K — much faster. And the Ryzen 7 3700X/3800X/3800XT is both faster and more economical — the new process technology allows the company to achieve this at the same time. Intel is faced with a choice — you can make a fast processor, economical — too (which the i5-10400 perfectly shows), but you have to choose. In general, it is clearly seen that the power consumption of the processors of both companies is increasing with each round of competition. But this is not news — and earlier in history it has always been like this: as soon as the struggle begins, productivity immediately increases — and power consumption too.
But if the process goes “as it should”, then productivity increases faster – so energy efficiency also increases. At the current stage, AMD’s success in this regard is more impressive … Although, to be honest, the Core i5-10400 surprised us a bit. Considering that this is actually still a clean Coffee Lake sample of 2017, the question arises — was it impossible right away like this? 🙂
Games
As already mentioned in the description of the methodology, it makes no sense to keep the «classic approach» to testing gaming performance — since video cards have long been determining not only it, but also significantly affect the cost of the system, you need to «dance» exclusively from them. And from the games themselves — too: in modern conditions, fixing a game set for a long time does not make sense, since literally everything can change with the next update. But we will carry out a brief test in (albeit) relatively synthetic conditions — using a couple of games in the «processor-dependent» mode.
Nothing new, though. You can continue to argue about whether Ryzen is “pulled” in games against Core or not — but this only applies to “third” Ryzen and “eighth-tenth” Core. Zen and Zen + … Everything is clear: even the modest Ryzen 3 3100 is the fastest. Even in Formula One, greedy for computational flows, where the new four cores are inferior to the new six or eight, the old ones cannot take the same amount here.
Of course, this does not mean that the first and second generations of Ryzen are unsuitable for games — in fact, in real conditions, everything always rests on the video card. It’s just that if you seriously focus on gaming applications, assembling an inexpensive computer, then it’s better that way. And so that there are no compromises — reach out to 3600. It’s not worth hoping that six or eight cores of the previous generation will be «stretched» in quantity.
Total
In general, the Moor has done his job — the Moor can leave. The first generation of Ryzen revived AMD — not without bumps, but competition has returned to the market not only in the budget segment. The second turned out to be transitional — gaining time to fine-tune Zen2. And after devices based on the new microarchitecture began to be delivered to the market in mass quantities, it became possible to release the “oldies” into retirement. Especially after the release of the new Ryzen 3 this year, which shook up the budget segment perfectly. True, the «gap» between the lines is too large — and the «semi-legal» Ryzen 5 3500/3500X no longer rectify the situation, so you just need to lower prices. Moreover, we repeat, Intel also found the weaknesses of a competitor — launching several processors of the Core i3 and i5 lines into this gap at once. The younger Core i5, which debuted today in our tests, is also certainly good. Especially when paired with an inexpensive board — the benefit of overclocking it will not work even if desired. But, we repeat, technically now the fight on equal terms is impossible — after all, AMD already has a new technical process, and Intel continues to “squeeze” the last juices out of 14 nm for more than five years. These juices turned out to be much more than expected, but it would be time to show something new. 90T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelCeleron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5- 11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5-7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3.
73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2.
26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2.
8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370) Celeron 333 (Slot 1) Celeron 300A (S370) Celeron 300A (Slot 1) Celeron 300 Celeron 266
You can select
up to 10 processors at the same time by holding Ctrl
Go to
select AMD Ryzen 95950XRyzen 9 5900XRyzen 7 5800X3DRyzen 7 5800XRyzen 7 5700XRyzen 7 5700GRyzen 5 5600XRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 5 5600GRyzen 5 5500Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GRyzen 7 PRO 4750GERyzen 5 PRO 4650GRyzen 5 PRO 4650GERyzen 3 PRO 4350GRyzen 3 PRO 4350GERyzen Threadripper 3960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8 -5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500 A4-3400A4-3300Phenom II X6 1100TPhenom II X6 1090T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelCeleron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5- 11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5-7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2.
26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2.