Intel Core i9 12900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 12900K
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3,2 GHz Intel Core i9 12900K with 16-cores against the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX with 32-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i9 12900K
91
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
46
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i9 12900K
96
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
93
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i9 12900K
70
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
48
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i9 12900K
86
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
66
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2990WX and 12900K
Advantages of Intel Core i9 12900K
- Newer — released 3-years and 3-months later
- 2x faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1982 vs 979 points
- Newer PCI Express version – 5. 0
- More than 32° C higher critical temperature
- More modern manufacturing process – 10 versus 12 nanometers
- 21% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 770
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Supports up to 2048 GB DDR4-2933 RAM
- Has 34 MB larger L3 cache size
- Has 16 more physical cores
- Supports quad-channel memory
- Around 10.62 GB/s (14%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i9 12900K
+99%
2001
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
1008
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 12900K
27396
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
+9%
29776
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i9 12900K
+83%
4222
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2305
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i9 12900K
+29%
41675
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
32370
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i9 12900K
+103%
1995
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
985
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 12900K
17272
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
+1%
17494
Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 12900K and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
General
Vendor | Intel | AMD |
Released | October 27, 2021 | August 13, 2018 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Alder Lake | — |
Model number | i9-12900K | — |
Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 | No |
P-Cores | 8 | 32 |
P-Threads | 16 | 64 |
Base Frequency (P) | 3,2 GHz | 3. 0 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
E-Cores | 8 | — |
E-Threads | 8 | — |
Base Frequency (E) | 2.4 GHz | — |
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 3.9 GHz | — |
Total Cores | 16 | 32 |
Total Threads | 24 | 64 |
Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 32x | 30x |
L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 14MB (shared) | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 30MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
Transistors | — | 19. 2 billions |
Fabrication process | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Socket | LGA-1700 | sTR4 |
TDP | 125 W | 250 W |
Peak temperature | 100°C | 68°C |
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | — |
GPU Boost Clock | 1550 MHz | — |
Shading Units | 256 | — |
TMUs | 16 | — |
ROPs | 8 | — |
Execution Units | 32 | — |
TGP | 15 W | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i9 12900K
0. 78 TFLOPS
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
n/a
Memory Support
Memory types | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
Memory Size | 128 GB | 2048 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 4 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 87.42 GB/s |
ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
Official site | Intel Core i9 12900K official page | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX official page |
PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 20 | 60 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i9 12900K
7 (87. 5%)
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
1 (12.5%)
Total votes: 8
ompetitors
1.
M1 Max and Core i9 12900K
2.
M1 Pro and Core i9 12900K
3.
Core i7 12700K and Core i9 12900K
4.
Apple M2 and Core i9 12900K
5.
Core i7 13700K and Core i9 12900K
6.
Core i9 13900K and Core i9 12900K
7.
Ryzen 9 6900HX and Core i9 12900K
8.
Core i5 13600K and Core i9 12900K
9.
Ryzen 9 7900X and Core i9 12900K
10.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i9 12900K
Compare other CPUs (480+)
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX or Intel Core i9 12900K?
Name
Message
Promotion
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs Intel Core i9-12900K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs Intel Core i9-12900K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on one side and the Intel Core i9-12900K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the very high-end desktop computer sector, It has 32 cores, 64 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 16 cores, 24 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 5,2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Intel Core i9-12900K | ||||||
Market (main) | Very high-end desktop computer | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Alder Lake | ||||||
Core name | Colfax | Alder Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Ryzen Threadripper 2000 | Core i9-12000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
YD299XAZUIHAF, |
BX8071512900K, |
||||||
Release date | Q4 2018 | Q4 2021 | ||||||
Lithography | 12 nm | Intel 7 | ||||||
Transistors | 19. 200.000.000 | — | ||||||
Cores | 32 | 16 | ||||||
Threads | 64 | 24 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,0 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 5,2 GHz | ||||||
Energy cores |
— |
8 Cores 8 Threads @ 2,4 / 3,9 GHz |
||||||
High performance cores |
— |
8 Cores 16 Threads @ 3,2 / 5,1 GHz |
||||||
Cache memory | 64 MB | 30 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 1 TB | 128 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR4-2933 |
DDR5-4800 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 4 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 87,42 GB/s | 76,8 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 60 | 20 | ||||||
TDP | 250 W | 125 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 750W ATX Power Supply | 650W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake) | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 32 | ||||||
GPU shading units | — | 256 | ||||||
GPU base clock | — | 300 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | — | 1550 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | — | 742,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | TR4, LGA-4094 | LGA1700 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket TR4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 68°C | 100°C | ||||||
AI accelerator |
— |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, |
||||||
Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
Security |
— |
OS Guard, |
||||||
Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI), |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 463 | 823 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 16. 317 | 11.708 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 159 | 289 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 5.099 | 4.052 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 430 | 756 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 13.033 | 10.352 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 996 | 2.026 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 29.639 | 27.767 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.296 | 4.255 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 32. 242 | 37.699 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.396 | 9.120 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
32.292 | 63.468 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
995 | 2.030 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
11.237 | 17.731 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
261 GFLOPS | 1.180 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
129 pts / W | 508 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i9-12900K is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i9-12900K is less. The Intel Core i9-12900K was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
463 16.317 |
Intel Core i9-12900K |
823 11.708 |
In single core, the difference is -44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
159 5. 099 |
Intel Core i9-12900K |
289 4.052 |
In single core, the difference is -45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
430 13. 033 |
Intel Core i9-12900K |
756 10.352 |
In single core, the difference is -43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
996 29. 639 |
Intel Core i9-12900K |
2.026 27.767 |
In single core, the difference is -51%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K |
4. 255 37.699 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
2.296 32.242 |
In single core, the difference is 85%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K |
9. 120 63.468 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
4.396 32.292 |
In single core, the difference is 107%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 97%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
4.907 55.879 |
Intel Core i9-12900K |
8.995 53.580 |
In single core, the difference is -45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K |
8.945 65. 784 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
4.554 40.476 |
In single core, the difference is 96%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 63%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K |
2. 030 17.731 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
995 11.237 |
In single core, the difference is 104%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 58%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K |
2.038 15.812 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
994 14.597 |
In single core, the difference is 105%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.
On macOS:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K |
1.922 15.785 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
1. 075 12.093 |
In single core, the difference is 79%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Intel equivalentIntel Core i9-12900K AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i9-12900Intel Core i9-12900FIntel Core i9-12900HIntel Core i9-12900HKIntel Core i9-12900HXIntel Core i9-12900KFIntel Core i9-12900KSIntel Core i9-12900T
Intel Core i9 10900X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 10900X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Which is better: 10-core Intel Core i9 10900X at 3. 7 GHz or AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX with 32 cores at 3.0 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core i9 10900x
53
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
46
Multi -flow productivity
,
Tests in the benchmarks, where all nuclei 9 are involved0024
What are the main differences between 2990WX and 10900X
Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 10900X
- More than 26°C higher maximum operating temperature
- Launched 1 year and 2 months later than rival
- 17% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1141 and
- 7% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 5 GHz vs. 4.2 GHz)
points
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Supports up to 2048GB DDR4-2933
- Has 22 more physical cores
- Has 44 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 12 versus 14 nanometers
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i9 10900X
+14%
1149
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
1008
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i9 10900X
14308
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
+108%
29776
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i9 10900X
+17%
2695
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2305
Passmark CPU (multi -core)
Core i9 10900x
22758
Ryzen Threadaripper 2990wx
+42%
32370
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i9 10900X
+17%
1149
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
985
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
+61%
17494
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i9 10900X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
General information
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Release date | October 7, 2019 | August 13, 2018 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Model number | i9-10900X | — |
Integrated graphics | No | No |
Processor
Cores | 10 | 32 |
threads | 20 | 64 |
Frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 3.0 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 10 | 32 |
Number of threads | 20 | 64 |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 37x | 30x |
Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 1MB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 20MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Number of transistors | — | 19.2 billion |
Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Socket | LGA-2066 | sTR4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 250 W |
Critical temperature | 94°C | 68°C |
Memory support
Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
Max. size | 256 GB | 2048 GB |
Number of channels | 4 | 4 |
Max. bandwidth | — | 87.42 GB/s |
ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
Site Intel Core i9 10900X | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | |
PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 48 | 60 |
Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i9 10900X
0 (0%)
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i9 10900X vs Intel Core i9 13900K
2.
Intel Core i9 10900X vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
3.
Intel Core i9 10900X vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Compare other CPUs (480+)
Intel Core i9 13900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 13900K
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Which is better: 24-core Intel Core i9 13900K at 3.0 GHz or AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X with 64 cores at 2.9 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core I9 13900K
100
Ryzen Threadripper 3990x
57
Multi -Exercise
Tests in the benchmarks, where all nourishing 9000 9000 Core Core Core90X and 13900K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 13900K
- 2 years and 9 months later than rival
- 78% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 2274 and 1277 points
- 26% faster Turbo Boost frequency (5. 4 GHz vs. 4.3 GHz)
- New standard PCI Express — 5.0
- There is an integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 770
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Has 92 MB more L3 cache
- Has 40 more physical cores
- Supports up to 256 GB of DDR4-3200
- Supports 4-channel memory
- More modern process technology — 7 vs 10 nanometers
At 5.711 GB /c (6%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i9 13900K
+81%
2289
Ryzen Threadripper 3990x
1265
Cinebench R23 (multi -core)
Core i9 13900k
3936
Ryzen Threadripper 390x
+91%
74956
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i9 13900K
+82%
4688
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2573
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i9 13900K
60670
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
+34%
81113
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i9 13900K
+79%
2292
Ryzen Threadripper 3990x
1283
Geekbench 5 (multi -core)
Core I9 13900K
24231
Ryzen ThreadAadripper 390x
+14%
27662
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i9 13900K and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
General information
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Release date | September 27, 2022 | January 10, 2020 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Raptor Lake | — |
Model number | i9-13900K | — |
Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | No |
Processor
Cores | 8 | 64 |
threads | 16 | 128 |
Frequency | 3. 0 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 5.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Cores | 16 | — |
threads | 16 | — |
Frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.3 GHz | — |
Number of cores | 24 | 64 |
Number of threads | 32 | 128 |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 30x | 29x |
Level 1 cache | 80KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 2MB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 36MB (shared) | 128MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Number of transistors | — | 19. 2 billion |
Process | 10 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Socket | LGA-1700 | sTRX4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125W | 280 W |
Max. TDP (Boost) | 253 W | — |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
GPU frequency | 300 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1650 MHz | — |
Shader blocks | 256 | — |
TMUs | 16 | — |
ROPs | 8 | — |
Computer units | 32 | — |
TGP | 15W | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i9 13900K
0. 78 teraflops
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
n/a
Memory support
Memory type | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
Max. size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 4 |
Max. bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 95.37 GB/s |
ECC support | Yes | Yes |
Other
Site Intel Core i9 13900K | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | |
PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 20 | 64 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i9 13900K
28 (82.