Ryzen 3 2200g vs ryzen 5 3400g: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G: What is the difference?

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G: What is the difference?

55points

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

58points

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Why is AMD Ryzen 3 2200G better than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G?

Has FMA4?

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3400G better than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G?

5.71% faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.7GHzvs4 x 3.5GHz
4 more CPU threads?
8vs4
2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm
40.21% higher PassMark result?
9390vs6697
0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHzvs3.7GHz
16.11% higher PassMark result (single)?
2379vs2049
30.85% higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?
3580vs2736
1.51x higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
1969vs1307

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Athlon 200GE

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD A10-9700

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i3-10100

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD A8-7600

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i5-4570

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

6 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

8. 5/10

6 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

3 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

6.7/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.3/10

6 votes

7.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

8.0/10

6 votes

6.0/10

3 votes

Performance

8.0/10

6 votes

7.3/10

3 votes

Reliability

8.3/10

6 votes

6.3/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

8.5/10

6 votes

7.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.5GHz

4 x 3.7GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.7GHz

4.2GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.5MB/core

0. 5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2993MHz

2933MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

43.7GB/s

43.71GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

680seconds

465.7seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

2339.7seconds

1460.1seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Ryzen 3 2200G: performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

We compared two 4-core desktop CPUs: the 3. 7 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 3400G against the 3.5 GHz Ryzen 3 2200G. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments (2)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 2200G and 3400G

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Newer — released 1-year and 5-months later
More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
14% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz)

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+14%

1075

Ryzen 3 2200G

943

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+35%

4857

Ryzen 3 2200G

3588

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+14%

2366

Ryzen 3 2200G

2069

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+38%

9404

Ryzen 3 2200G

6805

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+6%

972

Ryzen 3 2200G

913

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+27%

3937

Ryzen 3 2200G

3090

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 3 2200G

General

Vendor	AMD	AMD
Released	July 7, 2019	February 12, 2018
Type	Desktop	Desktop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Picasso	Raven Ridge
Socket	AM4	AM4
Integrated GPU	Radeon RX Vega 11	Radeon Vega 8

Performance

Cores	4	4
Threads	8	4
Base Frequency	3. 7 GHz	3.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency	4.2 GHz	3.7 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	37x	35x
L1 Cache	96K (per core)	128K (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 Cache	4MB (shared)	4MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	Yes	Yes

Transistors	4.9 billions	4.9 billions
Fabrication process	12 nm	14 nm
TDP	45-65 W	65 W
Max. temperature	95°C	95°C

Integrated Graphics	Radeon RX Vega 11	Radeon Vega 8
GPU Base Clock	300 MHz	300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock	1300 MHz	1100 MHz
Shading Units	704	512
TMUs	44	32
ROPs	8	8
Execution Units	11	8
TGP	65 W	65 W
Max. Resolution	3840×2160 — 60 Hz	3840×2160 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Ryzen 5 3400G

1.746 TFLOPS

Ryzen 3 2200G

1.13 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2933
Memory Size	64 GB	64 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	43.71 GB/s	43.71 GB/s
ECC Support	Yes	Yes

Official site	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G official page	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G official page
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	8	12

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 5 3400G

41 (83. 7%)

Ryzen 3 2200G

8 (16.3%)

Total votes: 49

ompetitors

1.
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen 5 3400G

2.
Ryzen 5 5500U vs Ryzen 5 3400G

3.
Ryzen 7 5700G vs Ryzen 5 3400G

4.
Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 5 3400G

5.
Core i3 12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G

6.
Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G vs Ryzen 5 3400G

7.
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G vs Ryzen 5 3400G

8.
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 3 2200G

9.
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G vs Ryzen 3 2200G

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G or Ryzen 5 3400G?

Name

Message

Promotion

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Fortnite Battle Royale

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Multi-Thread Performance

7434 Pts

9984 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1854 Pts

2067 Pts

Fortnite Battle Royale

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	66. 2 FPS
1080p	70.0 FPS
1440p	43.2 FPS
1440p	45.7 FPS
2160p	23.4 FPS
2160p	24.7 FPS
w1440p	35.6 FPS
w1440p	37.7 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	111.1 FPS
1080p	116.5 FPS
1440p	77.1 FPS
1440p	81.0 FPS
2160p	45.4 FPS
2160p	47.6 FPS
w1440p	65.3 FPS
w1440p	68.6 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	156. 1 FPS
1080p	163.1 FPS
1440p	111.1 FPS
1440p	116.2 FPS
2160p	67.3 FPS
2160p	70.4 FPS
w1440p	95.0 FPS
w1440p	99.5 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	245.9 FPS
1080p	256.1 FPS
1440p	178.9 FPS
1440p	186.7 FPS
2160p	111.3 FPS
2160p	116.1 FPS
w1440p	154.3 FPS
w1440p	161.3 FPS

Ryzen 3 2200G

The Ryzen 3 2200G has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
The Ryzen 3 2200G has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
The Ryzen 3 2200G has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
The Ryzen 3 2200G has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
The Ryzen 3 2200G has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Ryzen 5 3400G

The Ryzen 5 3400G is more power efficient and generates less heat.
The Ryzen 5 3400G has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Architecture

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Codename	Raven Ridge	Picasso
Generation	Ryzen 3 (Zen (Raven Ridge))	Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Picasso))
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	DDR4
Part#	YD2200C5M4MFB	YD3400
Production Status	Active	Active
Released	Feb 2018	Jul 2019

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Cache

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Cache L1	128K (per core)	128K (per core)
Cache L2	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Cache L3	4MB (shared)	4MB (shared)

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Cores

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
# of Cores	4	4
# of Threads	4	8
Integrated Graphics	Radeon Vega 8	Radeon RX Vega 11
SMP # CPUs	1	1

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Features

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Performance

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3. 5 GHz	3.7 GHz
Multiplier	35.0x	37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	No	No
TDP	65 W	65 W
Turbo Clock	up to 3.7 GHz	up to 4.2 GHz
Voltage	variable	variable

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Physical

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Die Size	210 mm²	210 mm²
Foundry	GlobalFoundries	GlobalFoundries
Package	µOPGA-1331	µOPGA-1331
Process Size	14 nm	12 nm
Socket	AMD Socket AM4	AMD Socket AM4
Transistors	4950 million	4,950 million
tCaseMax	unknown	unknown

Share Your Comments 0

2009

Minecraft

2009

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Summary

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

144%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

100%

Relative performance

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

124%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

100%

Relative performance

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

164%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Much higher single threaded performance (around 24% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 64% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).

Around 44% higher average synthetic performance.

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

None

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G			AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost
CnQ
NX bit

Architecture

	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G		AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Architecture	AMD Zen+	vs	AMD Zen
Market	Desktop	vs	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	vs	DDR4
Codename	Picasso	vs	Zen
Release Date	Jul 2019	vs	Jan 2018

Cores

	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G		AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Cores	4	vs	4
Threads	8	vs	4
SMPs	1	vs	1
Integrated Graphics	Radeon RX Vega 11	vs	Radeon Vega 8

Cache

	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G		AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
L1 Cache	128K (per core)	vs	128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	vs	512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache	4MB (shared)	vs	1024 KB (shared)

Physical

	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G		AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Socket	AMD Socket AM4	vs	AMD Socket AM4
Max Case Temp	unknown	vs	unknown
Package	ÂµOPGA-1331	vs
Die Size	210mmÂ²	vs	246mmÂ²
Process	12 nm	vs	14 nm

Performance

	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G		AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Cpu Frequency	3700 MHz	vs	3500 MHz
Turbo Clock	4200 MHz	vs	3700 MHz
Base Clock	100 MHz	vs	100 MHz
Voltage	variable	vs	variable
TDP	65 W	vs	65 W

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

4620 points
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

4070 points

Points — higher is better

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

19861 points
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

15400 points

Points — higher is better

points — higher is better

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Zen	Zen+
Core name	Raven Ridge	Picasso
Family	Ryzen 3 2000	Ryzen 5 3000
Part number(s), S-Spec	YD2200C5M4MFB, YD2200C5FBBOX	YD3400C5M4MFH, YD3400C5FHBOX
Release date	Q1 2018	Q3 2019
Lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Transistors	4. 950.000.000	4.950.000.000
Cores	4	4
Threads	4	8
Base frequency	3,5 GHz	3,7 GHz
Turbo frequency	3,7 GHz	4,2 GHz
Cache memory	4 MB	4 MB
Max memory capacity	64 GB	64 GB
Memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2933
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	43,71 GB/s	43,71 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	12	12
TDP	65 W	65 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Raven)	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU cores	8	11
GPU shading units	512	704
GPU base clock	300 MHz	300 MHz
GPU boost clock	1100 MHz	1400 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	1. 126 GFLOPS	1.746 GFLOPS
Socket	AM4, PGA-1331	AM4
Compatible motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	95°C	95°C
Crypto engine	Advanced Encryption Standard instructions	—
Security	Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection	—
CPU-Z single thread	419	461
CPU-Z multi thread	1. 694	2.518
Cinebench R15 single thread	140	162
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	585	752
Cinebench R23 single thread	953	980
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	3.637	4.814
PassMark single thread	2.047	2.353
PassMark CPU Mark	6.766	9.338
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	3.922	4.337
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	10. 594	14.118
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	174,4 GFLOPS	237,1 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	163 pts / W	217 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G	461 2.518
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	419 1.694

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 49%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G	162 752
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	140 585

In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 29%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G	980 4.814
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	953 3.637

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G	2.353 9.338
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	2.047 6.766

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G	4.337 14.118
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	3.922 10.594

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G	5.096 17.759
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	4.151 9.301

In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 91%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel equivalent

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.65 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Raven Ridge (Zen) Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q1/2018

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G operates with 6 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4. 20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Renoir (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q3/2020

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Compare Detail

3.50 GHz	Frequency	3.70 GHz
4	Cores	6
3.70 GHz	Turbo (1 Core)	4.20 GHz
3.65 GHz	Turbo (All Cores)	4.20 GHz
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
Yes	Overclocking	Yes
normal	Core Architecture	normal
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics	GPU	AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir)
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
14 nm	Technology	7 nm
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
12	DirectX Version	12
3	Max. displays	3
DDR4-2933	Memory	DDR4-3200
2	Memory channels	2
	Max memory
No	ECC	Yes
—	L2 Cache	—
4.00 MB	L3 Cache	8.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version	3.0
12	PCIe lanes	12
14 nm	Technology	7 nm
AM4	Socket	AM4
65 W	TDP	65 W
AMD-V, SVM	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
Q1/2018	Release date	Q3/2020
Show more data		Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G		AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
65 W	Max TDP	65 W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per year	NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Ryzen 3 2200G:

performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Which is better: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G at 3.7 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4. 2) or Ryzen 3 2200G at 3.5 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 3.7)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 4-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

Overview
Differences
Performance
Features
Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003

RYZEN 5 3400G

25,0003

Ryzen 3 2200G

19,0003

Energy efficiency

Energy Efficiency Chip

Ryzen 5 3400g

9000

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G

Key differences

What are the main differences between 2200G and 3400G

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Introduced 1 year and 5 months later than rival
More modern process technology — 12 vs 14 nanometers
14% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz)

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+14%

1075

Ryzen 3 2200G

943

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+35%

4857

Ryzen 3 2200G

3588

Passmark CPU (Single Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+14%

2366

Ryzen 3 2200G

2069

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+38%

9404

Ryzen 3 2200G

6805

Geekbench 5 (Single Core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+6%

972

Ryzen 3 2200G

913

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 3400G
+27%

3937

Ryzen 3 2200G

3090

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 3 2200G full technical specifications list

General information

Manufacturer	AMD	AMD
Release date	July 7, 2019	February 12, 2018
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Instruction set architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Picasso	Raven Ridge
Socket	AM4	AM4
Integrated graphics	Radeon RX Vega 11	Radeon Vega 8

Performance

Cores	4	4
Number of threads	8	4
Frequency	3. 7 GHz	3.5 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost	4.2 GHz	3.7 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	37x	35x
Level 1 cache	96KB (per core)	128KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	512KB (per core)	512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	4MB (shared)	4MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors	4.9 billion	4.9 billion
Process	12 nanometers	14 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP)	45-65W	65 W
Critical temperature	95°C	95°C

Integrated graphics	Radeon RX Vega 11	Radeon Vega 8
GPU frequency	300 MHz	300 MHz
Boost GPU frequency	1300 MHz	1100 MHz
Shader blocks	704	512
TMUs	44	32
ROPs	8	8
Computer units	11	8
TGP	65 W	65 W
Max. resolution	3840×2160 — 60Hz	3840×2160 — 60Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Ryzen 5 3400G

1.746 TFLOPS

Ryzen 3 2200G

1.13 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Type	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2933
Max. size	64 GB	64 GB
Number of channels	2	2
Max. throughput	43.71 GB/s	43.71 GB/s
ECC support	Yes	Yes

Other

Official site	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G website	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G website
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes	8	12

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Ryzen 5 3400G

41 (83. 7%)

Ryzen 3 2200G

8 (16.3%)

Total votes: 49

Competitors

1.
Ryzen 5 5600X or Ryzen 5 3400G

2.
Ryzen 5 5500U or Ryzen 5 3400G

3.
Ryzen 7 5700G or Ryzen 5 3400G

4.
Ryzen 5 5600G or Ryzen 5 3400G

5.
Core i3 12100 or Ryzen 5 3400G

6.
Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G or Ryzen 5 3400G

7.
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G or Ryzen 5 3400G

8.
Ryzen 3 3200G or Ryzen 3 2200G

9.
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G or Ryzen 3 2200G

What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G or Ryzen 5 3400G?

Name

Message

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G: What is the difference?

55 BALLLA

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

58 BALLLA

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

64 Facts compared to

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Why AMD Ryt 5 3400G?

Has FMA4?

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3400G better than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G?

5. 71% higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 3.5GHz
4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4
Are the semiconductors smaller than 2nm?
12nm vs 14nm
40.21% higher PassMark score?
9390 vs 6697
0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHz vs 3.7GHz
16.11% higher PassMark score (single)?
2379 vs 2049
30.85% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
3580 vs 2736
1.51x higher Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)?
1969 vs 1307

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600g

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

9000 AMD Ryzen 3 2200000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 Vs 9000 VS ATH

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD RYZEN 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600g

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMEN CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE I5-1 2200G

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-9400f

AMD

9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD RYZEN 5300000 AMD RYZEN 54000 AMD RYZEN Intel Core i3-10100

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD A8-7600

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

AMD Ryzen 3 2200000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS -4570

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G 9000g

AMD RYZEN RYZEN 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 4600g

Completion of prices

Users

Reviews total rating

AMD RYZEN 3 2200G

6 reviews of users

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

8. 5 /10

6 reviews of users

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

3 Reviews of Users

AMD Ryzen 5,000 9000 9000 AMD Ryzen 5,000 AMD /10

3 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

9.3 /10

6 Votes

7.3 /10

9000 3 Votes

Games

8.0 /10

6 Votes

6.0 /10

3 Votes

8.0 9000

Votes

9000 /10 000 9

Reliability

8.3 /10

6 Votes

6.3 /10

3 Votes

Energy Equality

8.5 /10

9000 6 VOTES

9000

7.0 /10

3 votes

Performance

1.cpu speed

4 x 3.5GHz

4 x 3.7GHz

4 x 3.7GHz cpu speed shows how many processing cycles per second it can perform

(processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multi-tasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.7GHz

4.2GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2993MHz

2933MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

43.7GB/s

43.71GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4 memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory debug code

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This benchmark measures CPU performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

680seconds

465.7seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

2339.7seconds

1460.1seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through digital rights management (DRM) technology .

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Specifications and Reviews / Overclockers.

News
Specifications

Reviews
Processors
Motherboards
Memory

Video cards
Cooling systems
Enclosures
Power supplies

Accumulators
Peripherals
Systems
Notebooks

Games
Analytics

Conference 960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760Kathlon X4 750Kathlon X4 740athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8-5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3650A6-3600A6-3500A4-3400A4-3300PHEL0T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan) Duron 950 (Spitfire) Duron 900 (Morgan) Duron 900 ( Spitfire) Duron 850 Duron 800 Duron 750 Duron 700 Duron 650 Duron 600 Athlon 1000 (Orion) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3.

73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2.

26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2.

8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370) Celeron 333 (Slot 1) Celeron 300A (S370) Celeron 300A (SLOT 1) Celeron 300CELERON 266

Go to all processors

Compare

AMDryzen 9 7900xryzen 7 7700xryzen 5 7600xry 95950XRyzen 9 5900XRyzen 7 5800X3DRyzen 7 5800XRyzen 7 5700XRyzen 7 5700GRyzen 5 5600XRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 5 5600GRyzen 5 5500Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GRyzen 7 PRO 4750GERyzen 5 PRO 4650GRyzen 5 PRO 4650GERyzen 3 PRO 4350GRyzen 3 PRO 4350GERyzen Threadripper 3960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8 -5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500 A4-3400A4-3300Phenom II X6 1100TPhenom II X6 1090T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan) Duron 950 (Spitfire) Duron 900 (Morgan) Duron 900 ( Spitfire) Duron 850 Duron 800 Duron 750 Duron 700 Duron 650 Duron 600 Athlon 1000 (Orion) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370)Celeron 333 (Slot 1)Celeron 300A (S370)Celeron 300A (Slot 1)Celeron 300Celeron 266

You can select
up to 10 processors simultaneously by holding Ctrl

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G processor reviews:

Ryzen 5 3400G versus Core i3-9100F with Radeon RX 550. Testing new AMD processor with integrated graphics core and comparing with competitors

U.A. | EN

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G — Destiny 2 vs GTX 1660 performance comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Destiny 2

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Ultra quality

Resolution	Frames per second
1080p	93. 2 FPS
1080p	98.6 FPS
1440p	80.0 FPS
1440p	84.7 FPS
2160p	40.3 FPS
2160p	42.6 FPS
w1440p	64.4 FPS
w1440p	68.1 FPS

High quality

Resolution	Frames per second
1080p	148.5 FPS
1080p	155.7 FPS
1440p	130.5 FPS
1440p	137.0 FPS
2160p	72.7 FPS
2160p	76.2 FPS
w1440p	108.6 FPS
w1440p	113. 8 FPS

Medium quality

Approval	Frames per second
1080p	203.8 FPS
1080p	212.8 FPS
1440p	181.0 FPS
1440p	189.2 FPS
2160p	105.0 FPS
2160p	109.8 FPS
w1440p	152.7 FPS
w1440p	159.6 FPS

Low quality

Resolution	Frames per second
1080p	314.4 FPS
1080p	327.0 FPS
1440p	282.1 FPS
1440p	293. 8 FPS
2160p	169.7 FPS
2160p	177.0 FPS
w1440p	241.0 FPS
w1440p	251.1 FPS

Ryzen 3 2200G

Ryzen 3 2200G has a higher level 2 cache. Data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for very slow DDR 9 RAM0012
Ryzen 3 2200G has higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
Ryzen 3 2200G has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
Ryzen 3 2200G has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
The Ryzen 3 2200G has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 5 3400G The Ryzen 5 3400G is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
Ryzen 5 3400G The Ryzen 5 3400G has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.

Compare Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Architecture

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Codename	Raven Ridge	Picasso
Generation	Ryzen 3 (Zen (Raven Ridge))	Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Picasso))
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	DDR4
Part#	YD2200C5M4MFB	YD3400
Production Status	Active	Active
Released	Feb 2018	Jul 2019

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Cache

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Cache L1	128K (per core)	128K (per core)
Cache L2	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Cache L3	4MB (shared)	4MB (shared)

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Cores

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
# of Cores	4	4
# of Threads	4	8
Integrated Graphics	Radeon Vega 8	Radeon RX Vega 11
SMP # CPUs	1	1

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Features

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Performance

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3. 5 GHz	3.7 GHz
Multiplier	35.0x	37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	No	No
TDP	65W	65W
Turbo Clock	up to 3.7 GHz	up to 4.2 GHz
Voltage	variable	variable

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G Physical

	Ryzen 3 2200G	Ryzen 5 3400G
Die Size	210 mm²	210 mm²
Foundry	GlobalFoundries	GlobalFoundries
Package	µOPGA-1331	µOPGA-1331
Process Size	14 nm	12 nm
Socket	AMD Socket AM4	AMD Socket AM4
Transistors	4950 million	4. 950 million
tCaseMax	unknown	unknown

Share your comments 0

Compare Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 5 3400G in more games

The highlight of the new APUs is the AMD Vega series graphics core based on the 5th generation AMD GCN microarchitecture. In addition, the new iGPUs received more computing units: the simplest currently in the desktop segment, Vega 8, has 512 stream processors, like the flagship of the previous line, and Vega 11 already offers 704. AMD Radeon Vega 8 core. It has 512 stream processors in its structure and operates at a maximum frequency of 1100 MHz. Its processing power (FP32) is 1,126 TFLOPS. For comparison: AMD Lexa PRO (Radeon RX 550) has the same figure of 1.211 TFLOPS, while NVIDIA GP108-300 (GeForce GT 1030) has 1.127 TFLOPS. We also note that the integrated video core provides support for 4K monitors and hardware acceleration of popular standards: H.264, HEVC and VP9, making it easier to stream videos from YouTube, Netflix, and more. Additionally, support for HDR and Radeon FreeSync is announced.

Planning

The choice of available kits turned out to be quite diverse, starting with the processor — 2200G vs. 2400G, $100 vs. $170 plus customs. And also an intra-American tax of 6% and delivery to the NP branch of 8 dollars. Here I had to define, albeit vague, but the criterion — if I add a little bit of the budget, but get a big increase in some quality — then I will take a more expensive option. If there is an opportunity to save a little, but somewhere I will lose a lot, I will not save. I decided to abandon the 2400G — for almost double the price it has hyper-trading, a higher frequency by 0.2 GHz, and 11 video card processing units versus 8 for the 2200G. In addition, the weak point, apparently, will be the memory, and the 2400G will not be able to turn around to its full potential. There were surprisingly many mini-ITX motherboards for socket AM4, and they have approximately the same functionality — a PCIe 16x slot, M.2 NVMe, video outputs. The boards were divided into 3 categories: conditionally Chinese (Biostar, $100), firms (Asus, top-end Asrock — from $160), and middling boards like MSI and Gigabyte — around $120-140. On MSI, there were complaints about compatibility with Linux — it is needed for work, so I chose the Gigabyte AB350N-WiFi. Of the buns — Wi-Fi, bluetooth and cool lighting. The kit included SATA cables (I didn’t even open the package) and a Wi-Fi antenna on a stand with a magnet. She fits perfectly in the back of the body.
Motherboard

The choice of cases was also quite large. I looked at several different Cooler Masters, but then I saw the Thermaltake Core V1 and realized that this was it. The main advantages are a huge and quiet 200mm fan and compatibility with full-size graphics cards up to 285mm in length. Of the current cards, most 1070 cards will fit there, which is quite worthy.

Case

I picked up the PSU according to the cooler master on the site — with the reserve for the upgrade, I counted 340 W at the output. In the same store there was Cooler Master B400 v.2 — judging by the reviews, quite a decent brand unit. I didn’t consider a modular PSU — all other things being equal, it will turn out to be twice as expensive, and there is a special compartment in the case where you can neatly and discreetly fold the extra wires from the PSU. At the same time, he added an uninterruptible power supply — a simple APC for 650 Va.

PSU

256 GB SSD. The 2.5 ″ format was not considered in principle, because, firstly, SATA, and secondly, there is an M.2 slot — there is nothing to be idle. It turned out that the top SATA SSDs intersect in prices with non-name NVMe. In this case, the speed differs by a factor of three. I chose Liteon MU X — they don’t seem to write anything bad about them. There was an Intel 600p in the same price category, but there are a lot of complaints about it. All sorts of Samsung EVO and all that — one and a half times more expensive.

SSD

A few goodbyes…

It’s safe to say that overclocking the Ryzen 3 2200G allows you to get a serious system for only $300. This amount includes a ready-made inexpensive air cooler, a good B350 motherboard, and 8GB of DDR4-3000 memory. By comparison, a Core i3-8100 for the yet-to-be-released B360 motherboard with 8GB of DDR4 memory and a GT 1030 graphics card will cost at least $370, so a twenty-plus percent savings will be well received by budget-conscious buyers.

In the worst case, you can expect a 10-15% increase in performance for this APU with a regular aftermarket air cooler, so that looks like a worthwhile investment too, without even mentioning the APU overclocking fuss brings a lot of pleasure. In fact, I found it more interesting than setting up an i7-8700K with a GTX 1080 Ti graphics card, although it wasn’t boring either.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl+Enter.

No related photos.

Evaluate the article:

( 6 assessments, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Tweet PIN

On the author

Author:
Steven Walton

original: Original ://www. techspot.com/article/1579-overclocking-guide-ryzen-3-2200g/

8 everything is intelligible and understandable, it overclocked to 3.7 percent, and the video is up to 1600, that’s just a question, but how to drive them into the BIOS?

novel
Roman 10/29/2019 Reply
Yes, the article turned out to be useful, thank you very much.

Roman 12/21/2019 Reply
memory crashed blasters 3000 15cl, drove ryzen up to 3.9 GHz, video up to 1.7 GHz voltages 1.4 pro and 1.2 video, ram drove up to 3600 with timings 20.22.22.42, but the program is high, but the program is high showed the main frequency even at a voltage of 1.4 oz, the speed result is surprising, from 40k meters per second of reading, to 50k meters per second of reading, and also increases in recording and copying, oz, which everyone calls shit on microns)

Vladislav 12/04/2019 Reply
I’m overclocking through the ryzen master … Everything is like yours, but after applying it requires a reboot, well, then it just doesn’t turn on . .. What is the problem

Igor 01/04/2020 Reply
it turns out to register in BIOS update it to the latest version !!! I had such a problem until I flashed the BIOS mother Gigabyte B450 DS3H

Dima 10.03.2020 Reply
0003

Igor 05/13/2020 Reply Can
be overclocked to 4GHz? and what voltage should be on 4ghz? the test freezes at 1.4 volts

Denis 07/21/2020 Reply
Overclocked via BIOS, MSI mother On the B350m chipset. Everything is clear in principle, except for one thing, my SoC and GFX voltages are tied to each other, how much I set SoC, the same amount is obtained for GFX, I can’t change it separately. In order to be stable and not get too hot, the CPU was set to 3900 with a voltage of 1.35, and the GPU to 1500 with a SoC voltage of 1.175. Memory DDR4-2666 16 GB in dual-channel mode operates at 3333 MHz with a voltage of 1.33.

Red 01/10/2021 Reply
It is clear that there is no optimal solution for everyone. It all depends on the specific model of spare parts. And yes, it’s more efficient to work through the BIOS. Edible article, thanks. Artyom

Bought-Enabled-Does not work

The vast majority of motherboards will not work with this processor right out of the box — you need to update the BIOS to a fresh one, and this requires an old generation processor. In the US, you can ask AMD to send you the simplest compatible processor for free, update the BIOS, and then return it. This option, for obvious reasons, was not suitable, so I ordered a board at a local, not particularly branded store — there was a small overpayment relative to Amazon, but I thought that everything would be fine. These expectations were not justified — the board did not see the processor. At startup, it just turns on the coolers to the fullest and shows a black screen. The seller tried to move out in the cold, but managed to explain that this is not necessary. In addition, it turned out that they do not have a contract with the service at all. As a result, we agreed that I would flash the BIOS myself in a third-party SC, and they would return the cost of the work to me. At the time of writing the text, I flashed the BIOS, but I have not yet gone for compensation. Conclusion: if I had bought on Amazon, I would not have lost anything at all.

Description

Ryzen 3 2200G Processor Overview
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is a low-end quad-core APU. Like the rest of Ryzen 3, it does not have a logical division of cores into twice as many threads, which does not prevent it from being a very interesting solution in its “class”. Despite the fact that AMD attributed it to the second generation of Ryzen, it, like its older brother, the 2400G, is built on the “older” 14nm Zen core of the 1st generation. But the actual performance difference between Zen and Zen+ is negligible, which makes it easy to ignore the fact that an older kernel is being used. The graphics unit (APU) Vega 8 is installed as a video card in the processor (where 8 is the number of stream processors) — a stripped-down analogue of discrete Vega video cards. It is installed on the same substrate as the processor chip and Vega 8 does not have its own memory. In its absence, the APU takes part of the RAM for the needs of the video card, but no more than 2 gigabytes. The frequency of RAM significantly affects the speed of the video card in games, so you should choose the fastest supported by the processor and motherboard. So, for whom is this processor suitable? Despite the release of the 3rd generation hybrid Ryzen 3200G and 3400G in the summer of 2021, the 2200G is ideal to use as an inexpensive office processor or a budget home processor. The presence of a built-in Vega 8 accelerator eliminates the need to buy a separate video card. Everything is clear with the office version, but what about the games? Don’t expect miracles — this is the most budget Ryzen with an integrated graphics card. All modern projects on medium-medium-low settings will give out 40-60 frames per second or a little more, which will allow you to play GTA5 without problems, for example. On the other hand, 2021 blockbusters like Control or Red Dead Redemption 2 are too tough for the budget Ryzen 3 2200G without a separate graphics card.
Conclusion:
If you need a great office processor or a very budget home PC, the Ryzen 3 2200G is the perfect choice. It fully justifies its price of 80-100 dollars (at the end of 2021).

Two small hints for those who want to buy this processor: 1) It runs great both on the processor part and on the video core, so we recommend choosing a motherboard with overclocking capability, for example, on B350, B450 chipsets, B550. 2) The video core works much better with memory in multi-channel mode, so it’s better to install memory in a bundle — 2 sticks of 8 gigabytes of DDR4 than 1 of 16 gigabytes of DDR4.

Assembly

Let’s start with the body. It is fully collapsible, all walls are on wing screws. All walls except the bottom are interchangeable, two with mesh, one with a window. The quality of the paint is pretty lousy, and under the bolts, the paint crumbles instantly. The front panel has a filter made of washable foam rubber, the panel itself is fastened with latches. The latches look secure. Under the cover is a low-speed and silent fan with a diameter of 200 mm, it occupies almost the entire panel. There are also seats for a water-cooled radiator or a pair of fans, it seems 120 mm each. Two USB 3.0 ports and two headphone and microphone jacks are brought forward. The kit comes with a bunch of bolts and rubber spacers for the drives and for the power supply. Instructions on what to screw in are very vague.

The basement of the cabinet is used for the power supply, with a window for ventilation at the bottom. The window is covered with a removable dust screen. In principle, the PSU can be turned over and take air from under the motherboard, but there is too little clearance. There is an empty space in front of the PSU where you can tamp extra wires.

The case has two identical drive cages along the right side. Each basket allows you to attach one 3. 5″ and one 2.5″ drive. Removed the front to make it easier to lay the wires. To try on, I had to climb on dusty mezzanines and get a couple of corpses of disks from there:

The processor arrived in a large box the size of a cooler, packed in an Amazon box three times larger. Air bags included.

Inside cooler, processor and stickers. Memory in a simple blister. The thermal paste is already on.

The assembly itself does not cause difficulties, especially if you look at the instructions with one eye. The slot for the SSD is on the reverse side, under the socket there is a metal plate. Assembled without problems, the only thing was that the rear plug for the case with some kind of noise, I had to make an effort
Radeon Vega 8
and
11
are by definition more powerful than the built-in solutions from
Intel
, therefore, to compare the new Ryzens with models
, the most recent gaming card in the form of a gaming card Intel 905 will have an advantage in the form of a gaming card Intel 905
GeForce GT 1030
. Let’s see how integrated graphics perform against a discrete, albeit inexpensive, graphics card. Otherwise, both PCs are identical, except for the processor cooling systems. For

CPU-Z pulled from the manufacturer’s website, but still half of the fields are empty In general, stability and silence are more important to me, but trying to overclock a little is still interesting. This section in no way claims to be complete or to set speed records. And in general, I’m not a real overclocker, but I found a benchmark at a construction site. In order not to bother, I installed the proprietary AMD Ryzen Master utility.

Of all the settings, only the supply voltage is not obvious — apparently, the program sets the lower limit, and the upper one remains standard, or is somehow calculated from the lower one. In general, in idle without overclocking, the processor drops power to 0.84V. Setting the frequency to 3700 MHz did not affect the results at all, apparently, during tests without overclocking, the standard Turboboost reached this figure anyway. I had to set 3800 — everything works fine. The GPU overclocked from 1.1 to 1.3 GHz — judging by the reviews, the video core works stably at this frequency. I set the memory to 1333 MHz — the modules used hold this without problems.
Cinebench

Here you can see that a noticeable increase is only in the video card.

Here is an increase of about 10%.

AIDA64

The memory works a little faster, but all this heats up at peak loads already on the verge. Plus, it is still not clear what is happening with the temperature of the memory and the voltage regulator on the motherboard.

I think that I will return the processor to the standard frequencies, and leave the memory in overclocking. Plus, the video, if necessary, can also be overclocked, if suddenly it is not enough.
Risen 5 3400g review

Updated: 09/28/2022

I needed a new computer mainly for work, and as it turned out later, to play a little games (inexpensive, and from completely new components). The task is quite difficult. But since not demanding games will be played, and this is not the main purpose of the PC, it was decided to assemble with integrated graphics from AMD.
It is probably not necessary to explain that the integrated graphics of intel are, to put it mildly, so-so. And in principle, I do not see any alternatives. If they are, share in the comment (how it was and how it became).

According to the characteristics, there is not much to tell. The frequencies of the processor itself have grown compared to its predecessor, and now it is 3700 MHz base frequency, and 4200 MHz in turbo mode. Vega 11 was overclocked to 1400 MHz. The processor itself has 4 cores and 8 threads. And in my opinion quite productive.

2. Motherboard GIGABYTE B450M S2H I can only say one thing about it — no matter how much I like the BIOS on the motherboards of this company, this board is ideal in terms of price and performance. There is a VRM zone heatsink, which is very important when overclocking. Yes, and the chipset allows you to perfectly drive the processor.

3. RAM I will say right away that use another one for this assembly. It is not bad and works great on the assembly with intel. But not here. I bought AMD Radeon R7 Performance Series RAM with good frequencies and timings. Yes, and it looks beautiful, but very light (the radiator is rather for beauty).

4. Cooling for the processor I bought in excess, in my opinion. Life has taught that these processors will generate much more heat than stated by the manufacturer. Apparently the built-in video core adds heat well. Especially if in the AIDA 64 test both the processor and the video core are loaded at the same time. For these reasons, a cooler for the PCCooler GI-X2 processor was purchased. Massive and tall, be sure to consider this when buying. I assembled everything in a case from an old PC, which is more than 12 years old for sure. And it did not fit a little in the case, since the mesh is fastened in this place. In a word, I liked the performance but did not like to put it on, in my opinion it snaps tightly. Inadvertently, the thought creeps in that you can damage the motherboard if you press a little more. But again, these are my feelings.

While testing some games on integrated graphics not so long ago, we limited ourselves exclusively to mass desktop solutions. First of all, because it was interesting for us to see what (and how) can generally work on the IGP from relatively «fresh» projects. Then we came to the conclusion that it is still better to purchase a discrete graphics card if you are really interested in games. And if you are not interested in insofar as , then it is better not to limit yourself to the budget model.

But compact systems are usually integrated to the death of and do not allow any liberties: what was bought is what you have to do with. But in this segment, Intel offers more powerful (at least formally) GPUs than in the desktop segment. But it seems that the company has temporarily lost interest in Iris Plus — and suddenly decided to use discrete video in its own NUCs. In fact, this is a revolution — this has not happened since the advent of the NUC line. Unless Kaby Lake-G was found in some models of the «eighth generation», and the integrated graphics of these processors, according to the logic of their device, do not differ from discrete ones. But still officially it is integrated. In addition, the NUC 8i7HNK and 8i7HVK are quite specific expensive models that stand apart on the market. In the same “8th generation” NUC, there were also more compact (and cheaper) models based on Coffee Lake-U processors with Iris Plus 655 graphics. the name is difficult to explain) — on Whiskey Lake processors and with a discrete Radeon RX 540. In general, the «eighth generation» NUC has become very motley — in common it only uses quad-core processors, and very different ones. But in the “seventh” generation, which is well known to us, there were only dual-core processors, but some of them were equipped with Iris Plus 650 graphics, from which the Iris Plus 655 does not differ too much. As a result, the idea arose to compare these three options: Iris Plus 650 + two cores, Iris Plus 655 + four cores, Radeon RX 540X + four cores.

And at the same time you can compare them with desktop solutions. This is all the more interesting, given the difference in the cores: even with the same number of cores, ultrabook solutions are forced to fit into a smaller heat pack, so they operate at lower frequencies. And if the whole chip starts to “warm up” the GPU, then at even lower ones 🙂 And what this will lead to is always interesting. Including because the Ryzen 5 3400G, the new AMD desktop APU, fell into our hands. Despite the number, the processor cores are still Zen + (as in the Ryzen 2000 processors), and not Zen2, and the GPU is the same Vega 11 as in the 2400G. However, process improvements and other optimizations allowed the campaign to significantly increase the clock speeds of all blocks compared to its predecessor, so performance should have increased. This begs the comparison of both Ryzen 5s with the Radeon RX 540X. 3.2 3.5/3.7 3.6/3.9 3.7/4.2 Cores/Threads 2/4 4/8 4/8 CASH L1, I/D, KB 128/64 256/128 256/128 256/AC L2 cache, KB 2×512 4×512 4×512 4×512 L3 cache, MiB
3.5/4.0 2.3/3.8 1.6/3.9 Cores/Threads 4/4 2/4 4
4/8 cache L1, I/D, KB 128/128 64/64 128/128 128/128
9

111111111AL 4×256 2×256 4×256 4×256 L3 cache (L4), MiB 6 4 (64) 6 (128) 6 RAM 2 × DDR4-2400 2 × DDR4-24-2400
4 2 × DDR4-2 ×
TDP, 65 28 28 15 GPU UHD Graphics 630 Iris Plus Graphics 650 Iris Plus Graphics 655 Radeon RX 540X
Of the Intel desktop models, we left only the older one tested with the Core i3-8100 integrated. The processor component of ultrabook solutions, in principle, is not so interesting, the main thing here is powerful (for Intel) integrated or junior discrete graphics. What is the Radeon RX 540X? In practice, this is an analogue of the desktop Radeon RX 550, where the frequency of the chip itself is increased to 1219 MHz, and the memory frequency (in this case, 2 GB GDDR5 is used) is reduced to 6000 MHz. Own memory, of course, will «pull» the video card forward compared to integrated solutions, so performance may be higher than that of the Ryzen 3 2200G (Vega 8 has the same 512 ALUs at 1100 MHz), but somewhere lower than Ryzen 5 (704 ALUs at 1250 or even 1400 MHz). However, why guess when you can just check 🙂

Testing

Testing methodology

World of Tanks enCore

The application is “light enough” that even with such graphics, performance is at least slightly dependent on the processor — but this did not help the desktop Core i3-8100. The Core i7-7567U has always been slightly faster than the old A-series APUs, and the new Athlons in games are approximately the same, and when compared head-on, we get what we expected. Generally speaking, from this level, you can already think about the average quality settings, although they are definitely drawn only by Ryzen desktop APUs and anything mobile paired with the Radeon RX 540X. As expected, such a bundle is faster than Ryzen 3, but slower than Ryzen 5. It is inferior to the new 3400G even at the “minimal wages”, since its speed has noticeably increased due to improvements in the processor part.

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands

It’s clear why Intel thought about installing a discrete graphics card in the NUC. Indeed, in the days of the “seventh generation”, these mini-PCs competed well with the “full-size” system units based on the then AMD APUs. Yes, they were more expensive — but much more compact, a little faster in general tasks and even in games no worse. But Ryzen abruptly broke this mutually beneficial parity. And it was not possible to return to it even now: the performance of the Radeon RX 540X in games is comparable to the Ryzen 3 2200G, but not to Ryzen 5. Yes, it is clear that more can be done in a desktop system. But no less clear, by the way, is the fact that it makes absolutely no sense to put the Radeon RX 550 in a new assembly. Even if the goal is to save money at the first stage, it’s better to buy a Ryzen 5 3400G without discrete graphics at all.

Final Fantasy XV

Another «video card» game, so all comments remain valid. However, both of these projects from the point of view of today’s testing, of course, are too heavy for . But in Ghost Recon, at least the Ryzen 5 3400G at the minimum managed to “break through” the psychological border of 30 FPS, but here this is not even close.

Far Cry 5

Again, the formal touch of the ribbon , although in principle you can not pay much attention to it. And so the trends are exactly the same as those noted above.

F1 2017

One of the few cases when the «gaming» NUC managed to almost catch up with the Ryzen 5 2400G — the processor, albeit ultrabook, clearly helped. The release of the Ryzen 5 3400G, however, brought everything back to its original position, along the way “passing” over 60 FPS at least in the minimum quality mode.

Hitman

The only thing new here is that AMD solutions are somewhat more relaxed about the transition to «medium» settings, both integrated and discrete solutions. There are no fundamental changes: by and large, you can play on a two-year-old NUC, but a desktop computer based on Ryzen 3 (at least) is better. Yes, and it’s inexpensive.

Total War: Warhammer II

Once again we see a game for which there is not enough integrated graphics — and even a lower discrete one too. But the distribution of roles among the subjects is similar to other games, which once again confirms our initial assumptions.

Total

The first NUCs with Iris Plus graphics appeared in early 2016 — and at that time they were pulling for a revolution: a mini PC that you can somehow play on! The then AMD APUs mainly claimed another niche — a budget computer, on which you can somehow play . Moreover, there were attempts to expand those APUs into the segment of laptops and mini-PCs, but for this it was necessary to greatly reduce the clock speeds, so that parity with Intel solutions disappeared, and in general — was a bit slow everything turned out to be in absolute numbers. True, cheaper — but that’s all.

Unfortunately, the Iris Plus 640/650 are not far from the Iris Plus 540, and the same can be said about the comparison in a pair of Iris Plus 650/655. The games didn’t stand still. AMD engineers did the same: now, as we see, low-voltage Intel processors need discrete graphics to return to their original positions. Moreover, this solution to the problem is also incomplete (since Ryzen 5 is faster than younger models of discrete graphics) and quite expensive. But, in any case, the comparison is still in the old paradigm: a compact platform versus a desktop computer. As for notebook solutions from AMD itself, not everything is simple there. For example, even the top-end Ryzen 7 3750H includes Vega 10 (and not Vega 11, like desktop Ryzen 5), and even “squeezed” by memory. In general, it’s hard to talk about parity with discrete video cards here — but with Iris Plus, perhaps, it’s possible.

On the other hand, it is equally clear that none of the configurations tested today can be considered full-fledged gaming solutions. In this regard, the positioning of “discrete NUCs” as “Mainstream-G” is correct: in fact, many popular games make demands on graphics that are hardly greater than the new “tanks”. As a result, the GPU of mass «socket» Intel processors often more or less copes with them. Well, all the integrated versions of Vega, Iris Plus from different years, and most even inexpensive video cards do it even better. Especially if you reduce the resolution to HD in order to reduce the load on the video system — with this approach, more technologically advanced projects can also “surrender”. And whether it can be considered a comfortable game — everyone will have to decide for themselves.

Initially, it was not planned to drag out the review on two separate materials, but AMD is one of those that will not let you get bored. During the preparation, a series of difficulties arose. It all started with memory. Surely, anyone who is interested in computer components knows that the relationship between processors built on the Zen architecture and RAM develops with a variable result. The motherboard that took part in the past testing of non-overclocked systems, ASUS TUF B450M-Plus Gaming, flatly refused to work stably with RAM at frequencies above 3266 MHz. And there is no desire to make a review “for show”.

We were ready for this turn of events, and the materialized ASUS ROG Strix X570-E Gaming adopted the new processor. However, we failed to rejoice at good memory overclocking on the advanced AMD X570 chipset. The maximum voltage for the memory modules turned out to be 1. 35 V. This is clearly not enough to conquer the record frequencies, with this voltage we managed to stabilize the system only at a frequency of 3333 MHz. Changing UEFI versions did nothing, contacting technical support also did not bring positive results. But we are overclockers! Encouraged by this thought, we found the ASUS ROG Strix B450-I Gaming. Luck turned away from us this time too, there were no problems with the choice of voltage modes, the motherboard demonstrated excellent overclocking potential in working with memory up to 3733 MHz, problems started when trying to overclock the RX Vega 11 video core.

The single power phase of the SOC was overheating, causing CPU and GPU throttling at the same time. Normally there were no such problems. But we are overclockers! . ASRock X570M Pro4 had a fairly advanced voltage conversion system, but, like ASUS TUF B450M-Plus Gaming, it did not provide stable high memory overclocking. An MSI B350I Pro AC was brought to light from the depths of our laboratory storage. There were some nuances, with the new version of the microcode that supports third-generation processors, overclocking the graphics core on the previous generation processor, which had worked fine before, turned out to be impossible, changing the values \u200b\u200bin UEFI did not affect the operating frequencies of the graphics core. Rolling back to an older firmware version fixed the issue. Naturally, it does not support Ryzen 5 3400G. But we are overclockers!

Overclocking features

With the advent of the third generation of Zen architecture processors, overclocking using ordinary cooling solutions has become ineffective, it is better to resort to more radical measures. So, in a way, we’re lucky to be dealing with a Zen+-based product where the hope is not to easily beat boost frequencies, but to do so for all cores. To change the operating frequencies of hybrid processors, it is necessary to disable the power consumption restrictions, otherwise the processor clamped in the frame will not be able to adequately work during overclocking. As a cooler, we used a liquid cooling circuit of sufficient capacity.

Processor part

We checked the possibility of overclocking the computing part depending on the voltage by changing the multiplier with a fixed base frequency. We decided to start with a voltage of 0.9 V to explore the possibility of reducing the standard voltage while maintaining overall performance. The RAM frequency was 2133 MHz with timings according to JEDEC and a fixed SOC-voltage of 1.05 V. The test from OCST 5.5.1 was used to check stability, the test was considered successful after passing 10 minutes of testing. Absolutely stable, perhaps, such a system is not, but you can get an idea of the capabilities of this instance of the CPU. The LLC value of the motherboard was fixed in such a way that the voltage on the processor did not decrease under load. The voltage values are specified according to those set in the UEFI settings of the motherboard.

The maximum frequency of passing the test turned out to be 4275 MHz for all cores, a further increase in voltage to 1. 5 V did not work. Additionally, the stability of the achieved frequency was checked using LinX v0.7.0 for AMD processors. The result obtained is not much, but more than the maximum boost. It is worth noting the ability to operate at voltages below 1.0 V and frequencies above 4.0 GHz with a voltage of about 1.2 V, which is very important for stock cooling systems.

Overclocking RAM

Many people understand different things by the word overclocking, it seems to us that the main goal of this event is to increase performance. Therefore, we will check how the combination of frequencies and timings affects performance in 3D applications. To do this, we will use the Time Spy, Fire Strike and Night Raid tests from the 3DMark test suite. The frequency of computing and graphics cores was fixed at 3.7 GHz and 1300 MHz, respectively. To select memory delays, we will use the popular among users of the AM4 DRAM Calculator for Ryzen platform, we will start with the Fast preset for SEC b-die memory chips. Let’s take 3200 MHz, which is available in most cases on the vast majority of systems, as the initial one, and we will increase the frequency until it is possible to pass the test. As a stability test, we use TestMem5 with a config from 1usmus. We test the graphic part with 3Dmark 06, and it was it that acted as a limitation in stabilizing high frequencies — if the memory test could safely complete without errors, then launching 3D applications led to driver failure or freezing. The maximum stable frequency can be considered 3533 MHz, while at 3600 MHz the memory test and 3Dmark 06 passed without errors, but from time to time the system could freeze. Playing with settings and voltages did not work. But since our study is of an educational nature, we will test in this mode as well. We will also deliberately apply settings with the Safe preset at a high enough frequency of 3533 MHz to understand how lowering the delays and memory modes can affect performance.

It should be understood that the results were obtained at frequencies close to the standard ones, and during overclocking, the difference can be more significant.

Vega 11 gets the most benefit from the frequency increase, while the CPU component does not receive an asymmetric increase. Changing the preset from Fast to Safe at 3533 MHz causes performance to drop to Fast 3200 MHz.

A similar situation in the test using DirectX 12. The performance increase is about 5%, still fast memory with more relaxed timings is equal to lower frequency memory, but with an optimized set of delays.

Night Raid reacted to the memory subsystem optimization by almost 7%, and this is the first time that Safe was faster than the lowest frequency tested.

By itself, the high frequency does not bring memory dividends, the maximum result is demonstrated by a combination of tight timings and frequency.

Graphic part

Similarly with the processor part, we will study the dependence of iGPU frequencies on the applied voltage. Let’s start with 0.9 V. 3DMark 06 is selected as a stability test.

For the previous generation of hybrid processors, the corridor of achievable frequencies lay within 1500-1650 MHz, the change in the technical process brought certain improvements, there is an increase in frequencies, although it cannot be called astronomical. Note the strange behavior at frequencies around 1300-1400 MHz, in this range, graphics instability was noted even at relatively high voltages.

When overclocking all components of the hybrid processor, the so-called «swing» appeared, when overclocking one component reduces the potential of another. The final settings that took part in testing were:

processor cores: 4.25 GHz @ 1.45 V;

graphics: 1775 MHz at 1.2 V;

RAM: 3533 MHz at 1.48 V.

To prevent the influence of overheating of components, additional airflow was used in the power supply circuits and memory modules.

It is possible that in certain scenarios these settings will show instability, but in our case the system passed the stress test and testing in games. I will note several cases of failure to start the system after shutdown, as a result of which the RAM frequency was reset to 2400 MHz. It is likely that on a different system or with better instances you can get better results, but we will be content with what we have.

AMD can only be envied in terms of the speed of creating processors. It designs and manufactures CPU series much more frequently than its main competitor, Intel. This is not always beneficial. However, AMD was determined to find the best solutions for each consumer niche.

Game processors with integrated graphics are no exception. AMD has released more than the first generation of Ryzen CPUs with an integrated graphics core. A vivid and relevant example of this is the Ryzen 5 3400G.

This is an attractive processor for a budget gaming build. It competes with some of Intel’s gaming CPUs. This article will focus on the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G. And more specifically about its advantages and disadvantages in games.

What makes the Ryzen 5 3400G useless as a gaming processor? Their capabilities and performance are enough to provide high performance and FPS. Of course, we are talking about online games and games that do not require large resources from the PC and CPU.

In addition, you can buy a gaming graphics card later. And in a small budget, include the optimal components (motherboard, RAM, ssd drive, etc.). As a result, a processor with integrated graphics allows you to save and rationally spend money on assembling a computer.

But is the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G really good for gaming? Doubt is caused by some of its characteristics. It only has 8 PCI Express 3.0 controller lanes. This is not enough for gaming assemblies, where more lines are needed for the interaction of the processor with RAM, storage media, a video card, etc.

The Ryzen 5 3400G has a small amount of L3 cache. It is 4 MB, which is not enough to work in gaming applications with high demands on computer resources. For example, the Ryzen 5 1600 is far superior to the CPU due to the presence of more cache memory in the third level, including.

These are far from all the reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G an «inferior» gaming processor. However, this statement is controversial and many will not agree with it.

Main advantage

The main advantage of the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is the integrated Vega 11 graphics core. Its performance is enough to ensure high performance. Thanks to this GPU, in many games FPS will be at a «playable» level at medium and even high graphics settings and resolutions up to 1080p.

In the end, not everything is so bad, we can say it’s good

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G processors are in demand. And this is a fact. And the main reason for the popularity is the presence of an innovative and productive integrated GPU. For some gamers, this CPU is the best option. It is suitable for budget gaming assemblies, reveals the potential of mid-range gaming graphics cards.