AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-8700
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-8700
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on one side and the Intel Core i7-8700 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-8700 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake | ||||||
Core name | Matisse | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 5 3000 | Core i7-8000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
100-000000031, |
BX80684I78700, |
||||||
Release date | Q3 2019 | Q4 2017 | ||||||
Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 14 nm++ | ||||||
Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 | 1.800.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 12 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 4,6 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 32 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR4-3200 |
DDR4-2666 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 47,68 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 23 | ||||||
GPU shading units | — | 184 | ||||||
GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | — | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
Security |
— |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2304@60Hz |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 509 | 489 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 4. 039 | 3.865 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 195 | 184 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.564 | 1.396 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.215 | 1.151 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 9.109 | 8.956 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.570 | 2.665 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 17.842 | 13.082 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.470 | 5.288 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
27. 530 | 23.378 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
484 GFLOPS | 406,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
424 pts / W | 360 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-8700 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
509 4.039 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
489 3.865 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
195 1.564 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
184 1.396 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
1.215 9.109 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
1.151 8.956 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
2.570 17.842 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
2.665 13.082 |
In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.470 27.530 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
5.288 23.378 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.782 30.309 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
6.041 26.876 |
In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.610 27.268 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
4.276 14.464 |
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 89%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5. 540 28.445 |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
5.742 25.519 |
In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-8700 AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Intel Core i7-870Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-8700TIntel Core i7-8705GIntel Core i7-8706G
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Just Cause 4
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3. 20GHz
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-8700
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
15150 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
2628 Pts
Just Cause 4
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-8700
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
66.5 FPS |
1080p |
65.3 FPS |
1440p |
49.2 FPS |
1440p |
48.3 FPS |
2160p |
25.6 FPS |
2160p |
25.1 FPS |
w1440p |
40.0 FPS |
w1440p |
39.3 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
111. 6 FPS |
1080p |
109.8 FPS |
1440p |
86.2 FPS |
1440p |
84.9 FPS |
2160p |
49.1 FPS |
2160p |
48.2 FPS |
w1440p |
72.2 FPS |
w1440p |
71.1 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
156.6 FPS |
1080p |
154.4 FPS |
1440p |
123.3 FPS |
1440p |
121.5 FPS |
2160p |
72.5 FPS |
2160p |
71.3 FPS |
w1440p |
104.4 FPS |
w1440p |
102.9 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
246. 8 FPS |
1080p |
243.5 FPS |
1440p |
197.4 FPS |
1440p |
194.7 FPS |
2160p |
119.4 FPS |
2160p |
117.6 FPS |
w1440p |
168.8 FPS |
w1440p |
166.5 FPS |
Ryzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-8700
- The i7-8700 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Architecture
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake |
Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | SR3QS |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Jul 2019 | Jan 2018 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Cache
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Cores
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 6 |
# of Threads | 12 | 12 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Performance
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3. 6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Multiplier | 36.0x | 32.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.6 GHz |
Voltage | variable | variable |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Physical
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | unknown | unknown |
Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
Process Size | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1151 |
Transistors | 4,800 million | unknown |
tCaseMax | unknown | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-8700: What is the difference?
68 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
55 Ballla
Intel Core i7-8700
Winter when comparing
VS
66 facts compared to
AMD RYZEN 5 3600 9000 Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than Intel Core i7-8700?
- 12. 5% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.6GHz vs 6 x 3.2GHz - 534MHz higher RAM speed?
3200MHz vs 2666MHz - Semiconductor size 7nm smaller?
7nm vs 14nm - 1.5MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 1.5MB - 15.7% higher PassMark score?
17860 vs 15437 - 20MB more L3 cache?
32MB vs 12MB - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3 - Has an unlocked multiplier?
Why is Intel Core i7-8700 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?
- 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 95°C - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.6GHz vs 4.2GHz - Does it have integrated graphics?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core I7 -800
VS
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Apple M1
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i5-9400F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
9000 I7- 6700
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000
9000 INTEL CORE COR2
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i7-8700k
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700x
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD Ryzen 5 3,000 000 AMD Ryzen 5 3,000 000 AMD Ryzen 5 3,000 000 3000 AMD VS
Intel Core i5-9400f
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i5-11400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 9005 9009 SOOTS 9009 SOOTS6
users reviews
General rating
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
8 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
/10
8 Reviews of users
Intel Core I7-8700
9000 9000 9000
Intel Core i7-8700
0. 0 /10
0 Reviews of Users
Functions
Quality
9.3 /10
8 Votes
reviews yet not
Games
9.3 /10
7 Votes
Reviews are not
9000
Reliability
9.5 /10
8 VOTES
Reviews not yet
Energy efficiency
/10
7 Votes
No reviews yet
Performance
CPU speed
6 x 3.6GHz
6 x 3.2GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform (including all processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking. nine0003
turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
4. 6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-8700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications. nine0003
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. nine0003
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
5. 33MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading. nine0003
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene. nine0003
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
235seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
705.9seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time. nine0003
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
∅
N/A
350MHz
Graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
∅
N/A
1200MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU actuators
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics. nine0003
monitor support
∅
N/A
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
∅
N/A
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
N/A
The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games. nine0003
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
TMUs take texture units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
∅
N/A
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics. nine0003
Memory
RAM speed
3200MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient. nine0003
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-8700
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB. nine0003
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions like Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time. nine0003
Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements. nine0003
Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening. nine0003
Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✔Intel Core i7-8700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600
✖Intel Core i7-8700
Technology integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming . nine0003
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Which CPUs are better?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 — Just Cause 4 vs GTX 1660 performance comparison
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Just Cause 4
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-8700
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
15150 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
2628 Pts
Just Cause 4
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-8700
Ultra quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
66. 5 FPS |
1080p |
65.3 FPS |
1440p |
49.2 FPS |
1440p |
48.3 FPS |
2160p | nine0004 25.6 FPS |
2160p |
25.1 FPS |
w1440p |
40.0 FPS |
w1440p |
39.3 FPS |
High quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
111.6 FPS |
1080p | |
1440p |
86.2 FPS |
1440p |
84.9 FPS |
2160p |
49.1 FPS |
2160p |
48.2 FPS |
w1440p |
72. 2 FPS |
w1440p |
71.1 FPS |
Medium quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
156.6 FPS |
1080p |
154.4 FPS |
1440p |
123.3 FPS |
1440p |
121.5 FPS |
2160p |
72.5 FPS |
2160p |
71.3 FPS |
w1440p |
104.4 FPS |
w1440p |
102.9 FPS |
Low quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
246.8 FPS |
1080p |
243.5 FPS |
1440p |
197. 4 FPS |
1440p |
194.7 FPS |
2160p |
119.4 FPS |
2160p |
117.6 FPS |
w1440p |
168.8 FPS |
w1440p |
166.5 FPS |
Ryzen 5 3600
- Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher level 2 cache. Data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for very slow DDR 9 RAM0029
- Ryzen 5 3600 has higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- Ryzen 5 3600 The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
i7-8700
- The i7-8700 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable. nine0029
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Architecture
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake |
Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | SR3QS |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Jul 2019 | Jan 2018 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Cache
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Cores
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 6 |
# of Threads | 12 | 12 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-8700 Performance
Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-8700 | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3.
|