Ryzen 3800x vs i9 9900k: AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference?

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference?

61points

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

67points

Intel Core i9-9900K

3800XT

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i9-9900K

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 3800X better than Intel Core i9-9900K?

  • 8.33% faster CPU speed?
    8 x 3.9GHzvs8 x 3.6GHz
  • 534MHz higher ram speed?
    3200MHzvs2666MHz
  • 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
    7nmvs14nm
  • 2MB bigger L2 cache?
    4MBvs2MB
  • 23.69% higher PassMark result?
    23374vs18898
  • 16MB bigger L3 cache?
    32MBvs16MB
  • 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
    4vs3
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Core i9-9900K better than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X?

  • 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    100°Cvs95°C
  • 0. 5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    5GHzvs4.5GHz
  • 10W lower TDP?
    95Wvs105W
  • Has integrated graphics?
  • 8.74% higher PassMark result (single)?
    2986vs2746
  • 7.3 more performance per watt?
    92.6vs85.3
  • Has NX bit?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

vs

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i3-1115G4

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

vs

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

vs

Intel Core i7-11800H

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

3 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

9. 0/10

3 User reviews

Intel Core i9-9900K

4 User reviews

Intel Core i9-9900K

8.8/10

4 User reviews

Features

Value for money

8.7/10

3 votes

8.5/10

4 votes

Gaming

8.7/10

3 votes

9.3/10

4 votes

Performance

8.5/10

2 votes

9.5/10

4 votes

Reliability

8.0/10

2 votes

9.0/10

4 votes

Energy efficiency

6.5/10

2 votes

8.8/10

4 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 3.9GHz

8 x 3.6GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.5GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

4MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

3200MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

47.68GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9. bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

171.6seconds

164.2seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

520.7seconds

544seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i9 9900K vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i9 9900K

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

We compared two 8-core desktop CPUs: the 3. 6 GHz Intel Core i9 9900K against the 3.9 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 3800X. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments (2)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i9 9900K

70

Ryzen 7 3800X

69

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i9 9900K

55

Ryzen 7 3800X

64

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i9 9900K

46

Ryzen 7 3800X

58

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i9 9900K

59

Ryzen 7 3800X

66

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 3800X and 9900K

Advantages of Intel Core i9 9900K

  • Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • Consumes up to 10% less energy than the Ryzen 7 3800X – 95 vs 105 Watt
  • 11% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4. 5 GHz)

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

  • More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
  • Has 16 MB larger L3 cache size
  • Newer PCI Express version – 4.0
  • Newer — released 9-months later
  • Around 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i9 9900K

1352

Ryzen 7 3800X

1351

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 9900K

12479

Ryzen 7 3800X
+11%

13856

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i9 9900K
+8%

2972

Ryzen 7 3800X

2742

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i9 9900K

18912

Ryzen 7 3800X
+24%

23434

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i9 9900K

1278

Ryzen 7 3800X
+5%

1345

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 9900K

8541

Ryzen 7 3800X
+12%

9525

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

General

Vendor Intel AMD
Released October 8, 2018 July 7, 2019
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Zen 2
Model number i9-9900K
Socket LGA-1151 AM4
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 No

Performance

Cores 8 8
Threads 16 16
Base Frequency 3. 6 GHz 3.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 5 GHz 4.5 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 39x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes
Transistors 3.8 billions
Fabrication process 14 nm 7 nm
TDP 95 W 105 W
Max. temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1200 MHz
Shading Units 192
TMUs 24
ROPs 3
Execution Units 24
TGP 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i9 9900K

0.38 TFLOPS

Ryzen 7 3800X

n/a

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-3200
Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 47.68 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes
Official site Intel Core i9 9900K official page AMD Ryzen 7 3800X official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i9 9900K

28 (26.4%)

Ryzen 7 3800X

78 (73.6%)

Total votes: 106

Сompetitors

1.
Intel Core i9 9900K and Apple M1 Max

2.
Intel Core i9 9900K and Apple M1 Pro

3.
Intel Core i9 9900K and Intel Core i9 12900K

4.
Intel Core i9 9900K and Intel Core i5 12600K

5.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

6.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and Intel Core i5 12600K

7.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

What’s The Best 8-Core Processor?

We’re still waiting on AMD’s
final Socket AMD 4 piece to the puzzle — the Ryzen 9 3950X, which was recently delayed till November, but today I’m looking at the Ryzen 7 3800X, which is AMD’s fastest 8-core, 16-thread CPU, sitting above the Ryzen 7 3700X and below the 12-core 24-thread Ryzen 9 3900X. There are two Intel
CPUs that are relevant here in terms of a direct comparison. Firstly there’s the Core i7-9700K, which also has eight cores and costs about the same at $380 versus $390 for the AMD CPU. However, it only has 8 threads and lacks hyper-threading, plus it’s not the fastest Intel 8-core CPU out there.

Antony Leather

That honor goes to the Core i9-9900K, which I’ve chosen as the direct comparison in the graphs for the simple reason we’re looking for the best 8-core CPU here and the Ryzen 7 3800X and Core i9-9900K represent AMD and Intel’s current 8-core flagships. That said, the Core i9-9900K costs around $70 more (a little less if you opt for the 9900KF which lacks onboard graphics) than the Ryzen 7 3800X so really, this is a three-way fight between the similarly-priced AMD CPU and the Core i7-9700K, and the AMD CPU and the Core i9-9900K, which has the same number of cores and threads. I’ve highlighted results for all three plus a bunch of other CPUs in the graphs too.

Cores/Threads Base/Boost Freq Total Cache TDP (Watts) Included cooler SEP (USD) Availability
Ryzen 9 3950X 16/32 3. 5GHz/4.7GHz 72MB 105W Wraith Prism RGB $749 September
Ryzen 9 3900X 12/24 3.8GHz/4.6GHz 70MB 105W Wraith Prism RGB $499 July 7, 2019
Ryzen 7 3800X 8/16 3.9GHz/4.5GHz 36MB 105W Wraith Prism RGB $399 July 7, 2019
Ryzen 7 3700X 8/16 3.6GHz/4.4GHz 36MB 65W Wraith Prism RGB $329 July 7, 2019
Ryzen 5 3600X 6/12 3.8GHz/4.4GHz 35MB 95W Wraith Spire $249 July 7, 2019
Ryzen 5 3600 6/12 3.6GHz/4.2GHz 35MB 65W Wraith Stealth $199 July 7, 2019

Specifications-wise the Ryzen 7 3800X is identical to the Ryzen 7 3700X under the hood with 8 cores and 16 threads plus 36MB total cache. However, the latter has a TDP of 65W versus 105W for the Ryzen 7 3800X due to the fact it has lower boost frequencies, dropping 300MHz on the base frequency, which amounted to a 200MHz lower all-core boost of 4GHz compared to 4.2GHz for the Ryzen 7 3800X, while the latter has a 100MHz higher peak boost frequency too. However, as I mentioned in my Ryzen 7 3700X review, it costs significantly less in the U.S at least, yet was overclockable to 4.3GHz across all cores — just 100MHz short of what you’d see in a single core at stock speed. The Ryzen 7 3800X has its work cut out if it’s to justify its higher price tag.

Test system

Antony Leather

I’ve rebuilt my test systems so they use cutting-edge components and also fully up to date versions of Windows 10 with the May 1903 update along with all the various security patches — both from motherboard manufacturers and Microsoft as these are known to have impacted on performance making any data obtained prior to these updates incomparable and unrepresentative.

I should also point out that I’ve used 3466MHz memory with all my systems now as this worked with older AMD CPUs as well as new ones, painting them in their best light, especially given memory prices are so low at the moment. You may see slightly better performance using faster memory, but you’ll be unlikely to get that working on 1st Gen Ryzen CPUs.

Overclocking: I managed to overclock the Ryzen 7 3800X to 4.4GHz with a vcore of 1.425V — the maximum I use with AMD CPUs and always suggest you aim to lower that for an every-day overclock if you do it yourself. Other CPU overclocks include: Ryzen 5 3600: 4.25GHz, Ryzen 5 3600X: 4.25GHz, AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: 4.3GHz, AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: 4.3GHz, AMD Ryzen 7 1800X: 4GHz, AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: 4.2GHz, AMD Threadripper 2920X: 4.2GHz, Intel Core i9-9900K: 5GHz, Intel Core i7-9700K: 5.1GHz, Intel Core i5-9600K: 5GHz, Intel Core i7-8700K: 5GHz.

Common components: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3466MHz memory, Nvidia RTX 2070 Super, Samsung 970 Evo 2TB M. 2 SSD, EK Waterblocks EK-MLC Phoenix liquid cooler, Corsair RM850i PSU

AMD systems

Socket AM4: MSI X470 Gaming Pro Carbon AC (Ryzen 7 1800X), Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master (2nd and 3rd Gen Ryzen)

Socket TR4: MSI MEG X399 Creation (Threadripper 2920X)

Intel systems:

LGA1151: MSI MEG Z390 Ace

LGA2066: Asus ROG Strix X299-E Gaming

Gaming Benchmarks

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

I use the built-in benchmark results here as it provides an in-depth look at performance, but it does use a 95th percentile rather than the 99th percentile I use in my other games’ manual tests. The difference is usually negligible, but bear that in mind. The Intel CPUs both have a lead here, with the AMD 8 and 12 core CPUs bunched together at around 105fps 95th percentile minim frame rate and 129fps average frame rate, with all three within the margin of error, which can be a few frames per second in this game, but it’s fairly clear that Intel’s 8-core CPUs have big leads with a relatively powerful graphics card and the most popular gaming resolution — 1080p, which does lean more on the CPU.

Antony Leather

Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5 seems to love CPUs that have the same number of cores as threads, so it wasn’t a surprise to see the Core i7-9700K and Core i5-9600K do well here. However, the next fastest CPU was the Ryzen 7 3800X when overclocked and it was quicker than the Core i9-9900K too.

Antony Leather

Dota 2

Dota 2 is an easy game to run but is a good example of what happens at high frame rates that are likely to appeal to those with high refresh rate monitors. Intel usually does well here and it was certainly the case in Dota 2, although you’d be hard-pressed to see the difference between the 103fps and 112fps 99th percentiles between the Ryzen 7 3800X and Core i7-9700K, but it’s a win for Intel nonetheless. As you’ll see in various other benchmarks, the overclocked result for the Ryzen 7 3800X is lower than the stock speed result, for the simple reason the frequency is lower than the peak stock boost speed.

Antony Leather

Content creation benchmarks

Adobe Premiere Pro

In games AMD not far off at all and faster in some titles and that’s at 1080p which will always show bigger differences. However, as usual, things don’t just reverse in content creation, but take a massive swing in favor of AMD. Premiere Pro saw the Ryzen 7 3800X perform the same as the far more expensive Core i9-9900K and totally out class the Core i7-9700K.

Antony Leather

Cinebench R20

A third place result in Cinebench’s single-threaded test is excellent for AMD, although once overclocked, the Core i7-9700K was quicker thanks to a massive 5.1GHz frequency, but if you’re not overclocking the AMD CPU is once again a match for Intel’s more expensive flagship.

Antony Leather

The multi-threaded test sees a similar result — the Ryzen 7 3800X sitting level with the Core i9-9900K and a huge amount faster than the similarly-priced Core i7-9700K and also offering a massive boost over the Rzyen 7 2700X too.

Antony Leather

HandBrake

Intel might claim that Cinebench is maybe not an entirely relevant test given its small userbase, but the fact remains that you’ll see similar results in other multi-threaded tests too such as HandBrake, where once again the Core i9-9900K was matched by the Ryzen 7 3800X.

Antony Leather

PC Mark 10 Image Editing

PC Mark 10’s image editing test seems to love AMD CPUs with even the Ryzen 7 2700X offering similar results to the Core i9-9900K with the Ryzen 7 3800X way out in front.

Antony Leather

Power Consumption

Despite offering significantly more performance than the Core i7-9700K in multi-threaded tasks the Ryzen 7 3800X system drew similar amounts of power from the wall and once overclocked offered massive power savings while matching or bettering the Core i9-9900K in content creation tests. Of course, in games, power consumption would be lower overall, but these results are significant for anyone planning to use their new CPU for heavy multi-threaded work.

Antony Leather

Antony Leather

Conclusion

The Ryzen 7 3800X is a little quicker at stock speed and offered some extra overclocking headroom over the Ryzen 7 3700X, but ultimately the latter is better value at current pricing. If you’ve set your heart on the Ryzen 7 3800X, though, and want to know whether to buy it or Intel’s two 8-core CPUs, it isn’t quite as clear cut. In content creation and multi-threaded workloads, AMD is the clear winner, matching or bettering the more expensive Core i9-9900K.

In games, as usual it’s very title-dependant. Far Cry 5 saw the Core i7-9700K perform brilliantly and even better the Core i9-9900K, which was also out-done by the AMD CPU. Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Dota 2, though, both preferred Intel, but the differences here were usually less than those between the two companies in content creation, and will be even less at higher resolutions. For pure-gaming systems, Intel still has a slight advantage, but outside of games, things swing massively in AMDs favor both in terms of value and raw performance.

Until the Ryzen 9 3950X arrives you can see my other AMD Ryzen Reviews:

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 3600X

Ryzen 7 3700X

Ryzen 9 3900X

Follow me here on Forbes or Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram or Reddit for more PC hardware news and reviews.

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i9-9900K








AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X on one side and the Intel Core i9-9900K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 5,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i9-9900K
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen 2

Coffee Lake
Core name

Matisse

Coffee Lake-S
Family

Ryzen 7 3000

Core i9-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec

100-000000025,
100-100000025BOX

BX80684I99900K,
BXC80684I99900K,
CM8068403873914,
SRELS, QQPP

Release date

Q3 2019

Q4 2018
Lithography

7 nm FinFET

14 nm++
Transistors

3. 800.000.000


Cores

8

8
Threads

16

16
Base frequency

3,9 GHz

3,6 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,5 GHz

5,0 GHz
Cache memory

32 MB

16 MB
Max memory capacity

128 GB

128 GB
Memory types

DDR4-3200

DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

47,68 GB/s

41,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

20

16
TDP

105 W

95 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

None

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)
GPU execution units

23
GPU shading units

184
GPU base clock

350 MHz
GPU boost clock

1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

423,2 GFLOPS
Socket

AM4

LGA1151
Compatible motherboard

Socket AM4 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

95°C

100°C
CPU-Z single thread

514

573
CPU-Z multi thread

5. 601

5.565
Cinebench R15 single thread

210

218
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

2.180

2.065
Cinebench R20 single thread

510

500
Cinebench R20 multi-thread

4.970

4.910
Cinebench R23 single thread

1.322

1.299
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

13.078

12.390
PassMark single thread

2.728

2.969
PassMark CPU Mark

23. 305

18.811
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

5.760

6.336
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

35.030

36.463
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core

1.282

1.324
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

8.811

8.718
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

648 GFLOPS

588 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

334 pts / W

384 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i9-9900K is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i9-9900K is less. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

514

5.601
Intel Core i9-9900K

573

5.565

In single core, the difference is -10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

210

2. 180
Intel Core i9-9900K

218

2.065

In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

510

4. 970
Intel Core i9-9900K

500

4.910

In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

1.322

13. 078
Intel Core i9-9900K

1.299

12.390

In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

2. 728

23.305
Intel Core i9-9900K

2.969

18.811

In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 24%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i9-9900K

6.336

36. 463
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

5.760

35.030

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

6.248

41.118
Intel Core i9-9900K

6.595

35.295

In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

6.176

31.100
Intel Core i9-9900K

4. 319

19.775

In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 57%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

5.738

36.130
Intel Core i9-9900K

6.317

35.651

In single core, the difference is -9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

1.282

8.811
Intel Core i9-9900K

1.324

8.718

In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

1.373

9.680
Intel Core i9-9900K

1.393

8.981

In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.

On macOS:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Intel Core i9-9900K

1.256

8.607
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

1.260

8.272

In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Intel equivalentIntel Core i9-9900K AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

Intel Core i9-9900Intel Core i9-9900KFIntel Core i9-9900KSIntel Core i9-9900TIntel Core i9-9900X

Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K — Need For Speed: Heat with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Need For Speed: Heat

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz


Ryzen 7 3800X
i9-9900K

Multi-Thread Performance

26821 Pts

20500 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2970 Pts

2908 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 7 3800X
i9-9900K


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

66. 2 FPS

1080p

68.2 FPS

1440p

52.0 FPS

1440p

52.7 FPS

2160p

32.9 FPS

2160p

33.3 FPS

w1440p

45.4 FPS

w1440p

46.1 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

111.1 FPS

1080p

114.0 FPS

1440p

90.4 FPS

1440p

91.5 FPS

2160p

61.0 FPS

2160p

61.6 FPS

w1440p

80.5 FPS

w1440p

81.6 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

156. 1 FPS

1080p

159.8 FPS

1440p

128.9 FPS

1440p

130.3 FPS

2160p

89.1 FPS

2160p

89.9 FPS

w1440p

115.6 FPS

w1440p

117.0 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

245.9 FPS

1080p

251.3 FPS

1440p

205.7 FPS

1440p

207.8 FPS

2160p

145.2 FPS

2160p

146.6 FPS

w1440p

185.8 FPS

w1440p

187.9 FPS

Ryzen 7 3800X
  • The Ryzen 7 3800X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 7 3800X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 7 3800X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-9900K
  • The i9-9900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-9900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K specifications

Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K Architecture
Ryzen 7 3800X i9-9900K
Codename Zen 2 Coffee Lake
Generation Ryzen 7
(Zen 2)
Core i7
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# unknown unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released Jul 2019 Oct 2018
Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K Cache
Ryzen 7 3800X i9-9900K
Cache L1 96K (per core) 64K (per core)
Cache L2 512K (per core) 256K (per core)
Cache L3 32MB 16MB (shared)
Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K Cores
Ryzen 7 3800X i9-9900K
# of Cores 8 8
# of Threads 16 16
Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
SMP # CPUs 1 1
Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K Performance
Ryzen 7 3800X i9-9900K
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3. 9 GHz 3.6 GHz
Multiplier 39.0x 36.0x
Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
TDP 105 W 95 W
Turbo Clock up to 4.5 GHz up to 5 GHz
Voltage variable variable
Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K Physical
Ryzen 7 3800X i9-9900K
Die Size unknown unknown
Foundry TSMC Intel
Package FC-LGA14C
Process Size 7 nm 14 nm
Socket AMD Socket AM4 Intel Socket 1151
Transistors 19,200 million unknown
tCaseMax unknown 72°C

Share Your Comments 0

Compare Ryzen 7 3800X vs i9-9900K in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i9-12900KF

Availability

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Processor (8C/16T, 36 MB Cache, 4. 5 GHz Max Boost)

Buy on Amazon

£263.99

In Stock

Updated 66 minutes ago

Availability

Core I9-12900KF 3.20GHZ Chip

Buy on Amazon

£589.99

In Stock

Updated 65 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3800X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 851 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

  • Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF — £263.99 vs £589.99

  • Up to 43% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-12900KF — £0.24 vs £0.42 per FPS

  • Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF — 105 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF

League of Legends

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 7 3800X

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


FPS

1123

79%

Value, £/FPS

£0. 24/FPS

100%

Price, £

£263.99

100%

Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Processor (8C/16T, 36 MB Cache, 4.5 GHz Max Boost)

Buy for £263.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 66 minutes ago

Core i9-12900KF

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021


FPS

1417

100%

Value, £/FPS

£0.42/FPS

57%

Price, £

£589.99

44%

FPS Winner

Core I9-12900KF 3.20GHZ Chip

Buy for £589.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 65 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 7 3800X

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019

Core i9-12900KF

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021

491

FPS

624

FPS

VALORANT

1123

FPS

1417

FPS

League of Legends

310

FPS

401

FPS

Apex Legends

282

FPS

360

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

304

FPS

388

FPS

Fortnite

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Ryzen 7 3800X

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


Single-Core

1289

66%

Multi-Core

8853

52%

Core i9-12900KF

Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021


Single-Core

1951

100%

Multi-Core

17092

100%

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

vs

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Jul 7th, 2019 Release Date

Nov 4th, 2021

Ryzen 7 Collection Core i9
Matisse Codename Alder Lake
AMD Socket AM4 Socket Intel Socket 1700

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

8 Cores

16

16 Threads

24

3. 9 GHz

Base Clock Speed 3.2 GHz
4.5 GHz Turbo Clock Speed

5.2 GHz

105 W

TDP 125 W

7 nm

Process Size 10 nm

39.0x

Multiplier 32.0x
None Integrated Graphics None
Yes Overclockable Yes

Builds Using Ryzen 7 3800X or Core i9-12900KF

League of Legends, 1080p, High

Provonto 4K Video Editing PC

731 FPS

£1.72/FPS

Radeon RX 6600

Ryzen 7 3800X

32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£1,259

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Luxe Gaming PC

1513 FPS

£1.75/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Core i9-12900KF

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

£2,643.6

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Luxe Gaming PC

1124 FPS

£1. 77/FPS

Radeon RX 6700 XT

Core i9-12900KF

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

£1,987.2

In Stock

Updated 62 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Luxe Gaming PC

1378 FPS

£1.78/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Core i9-12900KF

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

£2,452.8

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Luxe Gaming PC

1290 FPS

£1.78/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Core i9-12900KF

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

£2,294.4

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Luxe Gaming PC

1180 FPS

£1.81/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i9-12900KF

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

£2,140.8

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Luxe Gaming PC

1095 FPS

£1.83/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Core i9-12900KF

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

£2,007. 6

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

G6 Gaming PC

591 FPS

£2/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Ryzen 7 3800X

32 GB, 3 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£1,183.02

In Stock

Updated 60 minutes ago

Veno Scorp Gaming PC

1084 FPS

£2.04/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Ryzen 7 3800X

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

£2,215

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Luxe Gaming PC

885 FPS

£2.08/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i9-12900KF

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

£1,844.4

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Ryzen 7 3800X

£263.99

Athlon II X2 255

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 3800X

£263.99

Core 2 Duo T5900

N/A Stock

Core i9-12900KF

£589. 99

Core i7-4771

£156.58

Core i9-12900KF

£589.99

Core i5-655K

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 3800X

£263.99

Athlon II X2 220

N/A Stock

Core i9-12900KF

£589.99

A8-3800

£30.88

Core i9-12900KF

£589.99

Xeon Gold 6154

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 3800X

£263.99

Core i5-460M

N/A Stock

Core i9-12900KF

£589.99

Core i3-8350K

£261.8

Intel Core i9 9900K vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i9 9900K

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Which is better: Intel Core i9 9900K at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 5.0) or AMD Ryzen 7 3800X at 3.9 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.5)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 8-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Core i9 9900k

70

Ryzen 7 3800x

69

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus are involved0003

Core i9 9900k

55

Ryzen 7 3800x

64

Energy Efficiency

Energy Effect CHIP

Core I9 9900K

Ryzen 7 3800X 9000,000,000 58 58 58 9000,000 ° Camera

Core i9 9900K

59

Ryzen 7 3800X

66

Key differences

What are the main differences between 3800X and 9900K

Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 9900K

  • Includes Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • 10% lower than Ryzen 7 3800X peak power consumption — 95 vs 105 watts
  • 11% higher frequency in Turbo Boost vs. 4.5 GHz)

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

  • More modern process — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
  • Has 16 MB more L3 cache
  • New PCI Express standard — 4.0
  • 9 months later than rival
  • 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single -core)

Core i9 9900k

1352

Ryzen 7 3800x

1351

Cinebench R23 (Multi -High -Hoiler)

Core I9 9900K

12479

3800xen 7
+11%

13856

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i9 9900K
+8%

2972 ​​

Ryzen 7 3800X

2742

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i9 9900K

900 R2 18912

+24%

23434

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i9 9900K

1278

Ryzen 7 3800X
+5%

1345

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i9 9900K

8541

Ryzen 7 3800X
+12%

9525

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full specifications for Intel Core i9 9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

General information

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Release date October 8, 2018 July 7, 2019
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Zen 2
Model number i9-9900K
Socket LGA-1151 AM4
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 No

Performance

Cores 8 8
Number of threads 16 16
Frequency 3. 6 GHz 3.9 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 5 GHz 4.5 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 39x
Bus speed 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 16MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier Yes Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors 3.8 billion
Process 14 nanometers 7 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 95 W 105W
Critical temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency 350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency 1200 MHz
Shader blocks 192
TMUs 24
ROPs 3
Computer units 24
TGP 15W
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz

Igpu Flops

Core i9 9900k

0.38 Teraflops

Ryzen 7 3800x

N/D

Memory Support

Type of memory type DDR4-2666 DDR4-3200
Max. size 128 GB 128 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 47.68 GB/s
ECC support No Yes

Other

official website

website

Site Intel Core i9 9900K AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
PCI Express Version 3.0 4.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i9 9900K

28 (26. 4%)

Ryzen 7 3800X

78 (73.6%)

Total votes: 106

Competitors

1.
Intel Core i9 9900K vs Apple M1 Max

2.
Intel Core i9 9900K vs Apple M1 Pro

3.
Intel Core i9 9900K vs Intel Core i9 12900K

4.
Intel Core i9 9900K vs Intel Core i5 12600K

5.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

6.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i5 12600K

7.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 3800X or Intel Core i9 9900K?

Name

Message

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference?

61points

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

67points0003

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i9-9900K

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 3800X better than Intel Core i9-9900K?

  • 8. 33% higher CPU speed?
    8 x 3.9GHz vs 8 x 3.6GHz
  • 534MHz higher RAM speed?
    3200MHz vs 2666MHz
  • Semiconductor size 7nm smaller?
    7nm vs 14nm
  • 2MB more L2 cache?
    4MB vs 2MB
  • 23.69% higher PassMark score?
    23374 vs 18898
  • 16MB more L3 cache?
    32MB vs 16MB
  • 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
    4 vs 3
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core

  • 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
    100°C vs 95°C
  • 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    5GHz vs 4.5GHz
  • 10W below TDP?
    95W vs 105W
  • Does it have integrated graphics?
  • 8.74% higher PassMark score (single)?
    2986 vs 2746
  • 7. 3 higher performance per watt?
    92.6 vs 85.3
  • Has NX bit?

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD RYZEN 7 3800X

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5800x

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

Apple M1 Pro (10-Core)

AMD Ryzen 7 3800x 9000) VS 9000 VS 9000 AMD AMD AMD

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x

AMD Ryzen 7 3800x

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 3700x

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

VS

Intel Core I-9900

AMD Ryzen 7 3800x

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 5900x

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

Intel Core

AMD Ryzen 7 3800x

VS 9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

Intel Core i7-9700k

AMD Ryzen 7 3800x

VS

Intel Core i7-9700k

Intel Core I9-9900k

VS

AMD RYS AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

Intel Core i7-10700k

AMD Ryzen 7 3800x

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core, vs

AMD RYZEN 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 7 3800x

VS

Intel Core i7-10700k

Intel Core i9-9900k

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

AMD RYZEN 7 383

AMD Ryzen 70864 8. 8 /10

4 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

8.7 /10

9000 3 votes

8.5 /10

9000 4 Votes

Games

Games

Games

10

3 Votes

9.3 /10

4 Votes

performance

8.5 /10

2 Votes

/10

9000 4 VOTES

9 9000

Reliability

8.0 /10

2 Votes

/10

4 Votes

Energy efficiency

6.5 /10

VOTES

9000 2

Performance

1.CPU speed

8 x 3.9GHz

8 x 3.6GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.5GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

4MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

3200MHz

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

47.68GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4 memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

171.6seconds

164.2seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

520.7seconds

544seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 3800X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

impressions of the new line of processors / Sudo Null IT News

Tonight, AMD introduced a new family of Ryzen 7000 processors. We studied the benchmarks and now we are thinking which processor to take for testing in the Selectel Lab. What would you choose? Voting is under the cut.

Main differences from the previous generation Ryzen 5000:

  • Zen 4 architecture, 5nm instead of 7nm dies,
  • new Socket AM5 with support for DDR5 memory, PCIe 5.0 interface,
  • integrated graphics on all processors of the line,
  • significant increase in base and maximum frequencies,
  • L2 cache increase,
  • improved performance and energy efficiency.

The company also introduced four chipsets for socket AM5 motherboards: X670 Extreme, X670, B550 Extreme and B550. More productive and, as a result, more expensive X670 will be available in September, and B550 — from October.

What has changed?

The table shows the specifications of the previous generation AMD Ryzen 5000.


According to AMD, the performance increase per IPC clock will be up to 13% and up to 29% single-threaded performance.

Characteristics on the example of the top processor AMD Ryzen 9 7950X:

  • base frequency increased from 3.4 GHz to 4.5 GHz
  • maximum frequency changed from 4.9 GHz to 5.7 GHz
  • doubled L2 cache
  • TDP increased from 105W to 170W
  • added integrated graphics, in the AMD Ryzen 5000 generation it was only available in the 5700G and 5600G models

The younger models also do not lag behind in the increase in base frequencies. With such changes in the characteristics of processors, the declared growth looks expected. The use of faster and more powerful DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 will further increase system performance.

Application performance improvement

At the presentation, a comparison of the benchmark results of the new AMD Ryzen 9 7950X processor against AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in applications was presented:

  • V-Ray Render: + 48%
  • Blender Render: +30%
  • Cinebench R23 nT: +48%
  • POV Ray: +45%

A significant increase in performance, rendering speed and data processing is visible. Similar results were obtained when testing the operation of processors in gaming.

The performance gain of the Zen 4 architecture compared to Zen 3 in various benchmarks is from 4 to 39%.

Prices

The start of sales is scheduled for September 27, the prices are announced as follows:

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X — $ 699
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X — $549
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X — $399
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X — $299

Prior to launch on Amazon (shipping in the US), the previous generation is discounted:

Ryzen 95950X — $546
Ryzen 9 5900X — $370
Ryzen 7 5700X — $ 279

Interesting arithmetic: with the declared increase in performance in benchmarks up to 45%, the discount on the previous generation was 20-30% of the price of new hardware. Do not forget that DDR5 memory is still more expensive than DDR4, and motherboards with socket AM5 at the start of sales will be expected to cost more than AM4. All this will affect the final cost of assembly.

Competing with Intel

AMD compared the new Ryzen 9 7950X with the Intel Core i9-12900K and got the following benchmark results:

  • V-Ray Render: +62%
  • Blender Render: +36%
  • Cinebench R23 nT: +41%
  • POV Ray: +41%

Particular emphasis was placed on rendering efficiency combined with low power consumption.

Not surprising, given the difference in TDP processors. At the same time, Intel positions 8 of the 16 cores of the i9 processor-12900K as energy efficient and runs in 24 threads versus 32 for the 7950X. This affects performance in favor of AMD.

However, the Intel Core i9-12900K is priced at $569 on Amazon, which is $130 or 19% cheaper than the new AMD Ryzen 7950X.

Not spared performance benchmarks in games. The entire line of Ryzen 7000 processors presented in AMD’s presentation turned out to be more powerful than the i9-12900K.