Ryzen 5 1600x vs 3600: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs 3600


28 May20\|Techpowerup Intel Core i5-10400F Review — Six …	14 %	FarC5 20%, BFV 21%, SotTR 6%, Rage2 4%, Witcher3 3%, Civ6 21%, ACO 7%, MetroEx 13%, Sekiro 24%, Wolf2 22%
14 Nov19\|PCGamer AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review	15 %	Hitm2 26%, FarC5 18%, StrangeB 0%, TWarW2 20%, SotTR 21%, ACO 17%, MetroEx 13%, MESoW 8%, Divis2 9%
20 Oct20\|Tom’s Hardware AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Non-X Mar…	31 %	Hitm2 38%, FarC5 34%, AotS 27%, WarhDoW3 36%, ProjC2 35%, GTAV 35%, Civ6 29%, FinFant15 22%, WoT 35%, Divis2 15%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	74.4 Pts	+1%	73.6 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed	120 Pts	Faster single-core speed. +12%	107 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed	232 Pts	Faster dual-core speed. +12%	208 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed	438 Pts	Faster quad-core speed. +11%	394 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed	769 Pts	Faster octa-core speed. +14%	675 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	85. 6 Pts	Slightly lower OC memory latency. +5%	81.3 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Mixed Speed	129 Pts	Faster OC single-core speed. +12%	115 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Mixed Speed	255 Pts	Faster OC dual-core speed. +12%	228 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Mixed Speed	494 Pts	Faster OC quad-core speed. +14%	435 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Mixed Speed	851 Pts	Faster OC octa-core speed. +14%	746 Pts


Age Newest	38 Months	Much more recent. +42%	65 Months
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +32%	95 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores		6 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads		12 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	7 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +50%	14 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.6 GHz		3.6 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4. 2 GHz	+5%	4 GHz
64-Core OC Multi Core Mixed Speed	1124 Pts	Faster OC 64-core speed. +13%	994 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed	1007 Pts	Faster 64-core speed. +12%	898 Pts

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: What is the difference?

46points

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

61points

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Comparison winner

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 1600X better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?

1000million more transistors?
4800 millionvs3800 million
Has FMA4?

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X?

800MHz higher ram speed?
3200MHzvs2400MHz
7nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs14nm
30W lower TDP?
65Wvs95W
16MB bigger L3 cache?
32MBvs16MB
1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
4vs3
256KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs128KB
2. 73MB/core more L3 cache per core?
5.33MB/corevs2.6MB/core
Has NX bit?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i5-7600K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 4500

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD A10-7850K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i3-12100

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

0 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

5 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

9.0/10

5 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

9.2/10

5 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

8.8/10

4 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

9.0/10

5 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

9.2/10

5 votes

Energy efficiency

No reviews yet

9.3/10

4 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.6GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.2GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

2.6MB/core

5.33MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2400MHz

3200MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

47.68GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5.maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9. bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

235seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8. Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

705.9seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600X: performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

We compared two 6-core desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 3600 against the 3.6 GHz Ryzen 5 1600X. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600X

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600X

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600X

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600X

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 1600X and 3600

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600

More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
Has 16 MB larger L3 cache size
Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-3200 RAM
Newer — released 2-years and 3-months later
Consumes up to 32% less energy than the Ryzen 5 1600X – 65 vs 95 Watt
Newer PCI Express version – 4. 0
26% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1252 vs 991 points
Around 7.94 GB/s (20%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz)

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+38%

1287

Ryzen 5 1600X

934

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+46%

9443

Ryzen 5 1600X

6450

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+18%

2562

Ryzen 5 1600X

2174

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+38%

17787

Ryzen 5 1600X

12921

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+26%

1248

Ryzen 5 1600X

987

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+22%

7087

Ryzen 5 1600X

5826

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 1600X

General

Vendor	AMD	AMD
Released	July 7, 2019	April 11, 2017
Type	Desktop	Desktop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Matisse	Zen
Socket	AM4	AM4
Integrated GPU	No	No

Performance

Cores	6	6
Threads	12	12
Base Frequency	3. 6 GHz	3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency	4.2 GHz	4 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	36x	36x
L1 Cache	64K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 Cache	32MB (shared)	16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	Yes	Yes

Transistors	3.8 billions	4.8 billions
Fabrication process	7 nm	14 nm
TDP	65 W	95 W
Max. temperature	95°C	95°C

Memory support

Memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2666
Memory Size	128 GB	64 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	47.68 GB/s	39.74 GB/s
ECC Support	Yes	Yes

Official site	AMD Ryzen 5 3600 official page	AMD Ryzen 5 1600X official page
PCI Express Version	4.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	16	24

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 5 3600

32 (91.4%)

Ryzen 5 1600X

3 (8.6%)

Total votes: 35

ompetitors

1.
Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5600X

2.
Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 5600G

3.
Ryzen 5 3600 or Core i5 12400

4.
Ryzen 5 3600 or Core i3 12100

5.
Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 7 5700X

6.
Ryzen 5 1600X or Apple M1

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X or Ryzen 5 3600?

Name

Message

Promotion

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Just Cause 4

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 3600

Multi-Thread Performance

13228 Pts

19634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1975 Pts

2900 Pts

Just Cause 4

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 3600

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	54. 9 FPS
1080p	66.5 FPS
1440p	40.6 FPS
1440p	49.2 FPS
2160p	21.1 FPS
2160p	25.6 FPS
w1440p	33.0 FPS
w1440p	40.0 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	94.7 FPS
1080p	111.6 FPS
1440p	73.1 FPS
1440p	86.2 FPS
2160p	41.5 FPS
2160p	49.1 FPS
w1440p	61.1 FPS
w1440p	72.2 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	134. 6 FPS
1080p	156.6 FPS
1440p	105.6 FPS
1440p	123.3 FPS
2160p	61.8 FPS
2160p	72.5 FPS
w1440p	89.3 FPS
w1440p	104.4 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	214.2 FPS
1080p	246.8 FPS
1440p	170.7 FPS
1440p	197.4 FPS
2160p	102.5 FPS
2160p	119.4 FPS
w1440p	145.6 FPS
w1440p	168.8 FPS

Ryzen 5 1600X

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture

	Ryzen 5 1600X	Ryzen 5 3600
Codename	Zen	Zen 2
Generation	Ryzen 5 (Zen)	Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	DDR4
Part#	YD160XBCM6IAEYD160XBCAEWOF	unknown
Production Status	Active	Active
Released	Apr 2017	Jul 2019

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache

	Ryzen 5 1600X	Ryzen 5 3600
Cache L1	96K (per core)	96K (per core)
Cache L2	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Cache L3	16MB (shared)	32MB (shared)

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores

	Ryzen 5 1600X	Ryzen 5 3600
# of Cores	6	6
# of Threads	12	12
Integrated Graphics	N/A	N/A
SMP # CPUs	1	1

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features

	Ryzen 5 1600X	Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Notes

	Ryzen 5 1600X	Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance

	Ryzen 5 1600X	Ryzen 5 3600
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3. 6 GHz	3.6 GHz
Multiplier	36.0x	36.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	Yes	Yes
TDP	95 W	65 W
Turbo Clock	up to 4 GHz	up to 4.2 GHz
Voltage	unknown	variable

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical

	Ryzen 5 1600X	Ryzen 5 3600
Die Size	192 mm²	unknown
Foundry	GlobalFoundries	TSMC
Package	µPGA
Process Size	14 nm	7 nm
Socket	AMD Socket AM4	AMD Socket AM4
Transistors	4800 million	4,800 million
tCaseMax	unknown	unknown

Share Your Comments 0

2009

Minecraft

2009

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Zen	Zen 2
Core name	Summit Ridge	Matisse
Family	Ryzen 5 1000	Ryzen 5 3000
Part number(s), S-Spec	YD160XBCAEWOF, YD160XBCM6IAE	100-000000031, 100-000000031BOX
Release date	Q1 2017	Q3 2019
Lithography	14 nm	7 nm FinFET
Transistors	4. 800.000.000	4.800.000.000
Cores	6	6
Threads	12	12
Base frequency	3,6 GHz	3,6 GHz
Turbo frequency	4,0 GHz	4,2 GHz
Cache memory	16 MB	32 MB
Max memory capacity	64 GB	128 GB
Memory types	DDR4-2667	DDR4-3200
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	39,74 GB/s	47,68 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	24	20
TDP	95 W	65 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	None
Socket	AM4, PGA-1331	AM4
Compatible motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	95°C	95°C
CPU-Z single thread	403	509
CPU-Z multi thread	3. 179	4.039
Cinebench R15 single thread	162	195
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	1.232	1.564
Cinebench R23 single thread	1.029	1.215
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	7.081	9.109
PassMark single thread	2.176	2.570
PassMark CPU Mark	13.005	17.842
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	4.345	5.470
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	20. 509	27.530
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	253,9 GFLOPS	484 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	216 pts / W	424 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	509 4.039
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	403 3.179

In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 27%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	195 1.564
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	162 1.232

In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 27%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	1.215 9.109
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	1.029 7.081

In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 29%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	2.570 17.842
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	2.176 13.005

In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 37%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	5.470 27.530
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	4.345 20.509

In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	5.782 30.309
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	4.249 19.092

In single core, the difference is 36%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 59%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	5.540 28.445
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	4.540 21.479

In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel equivalent

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 7 5800X

Availability

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor (YD160XBCAEWOF)

Buy on Amazon

$160

In Stock

Updated 27 minutes ago

Availability

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor

Buy on Amazon

$256. 5

In Stock

Updated 27 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1304 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X — $160.0 vs $256.5
Up to 19% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 7 5800X — $0.66 vs $0.81 per FPS
Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — 95 vs 105 Watts

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Grand Theft Auto V

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 5 1600X

Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017

FPS

243

77%

Value, $/FPS

$0.66/FPS

100%

Price, $

$160

100%

Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor (YD160XBCAEWOF)

Buy for $160 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 27 minutes ago

Ryzen 7 5800X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020

FPS

316

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0. 81/FPS

81%

Price, $

$256.5

62%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor

Buy for $256.5 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 27 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 5 1600X

Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017

Ryzen 7 5800X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020

243

FPS

316

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

977

FPS

1252

FPS

League of Legends

424

FPS

550

FPS

VALORANT

1305

FPS

1662

FPS

Minecraft

264

FPS

349

FPS

Apex Legends

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Ryzen 5 1600X

Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017

Single-Core

944

56%

Multi-Core

5144

50%

Ryzen 7 5800X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020

Single-Core

1671

100%

Multi-Core

10337

100%

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X	vs	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Apr 11th, 2017	Release Date	Nov 5th, 2020
Ryzen 5	Collection	Ryzen 7
Summit Ridge	Codename	Vermeer
AMD Socket AM4	Socket	AMD Socket AM4
Desktop	Segment	Desktop
6	Cores	8
12	Threads	16
3. 6 GHz	Base Clock Speed	3.8 GHz
4.0 GHz	Turbo Clock Speed	4.7 GHz
95 W	TDP	105 W
14 nm	Process Size	7 nm
36.0x	Multiplier	38.0x
None	Integrated Graphics	None
Yes	Overclockable	Yes

Builds Using Ryzen 5 1600X or Ryzen 7 5800X

Grand Theft Auto V, 1080p, High

ASUS ROG Strix GA15 Gaming Desktop PC

242 FPS

$4.83/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 7 5800X

32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,169

In Stock

Updated 18 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix GA15 Gaming Desktop PC

242 FPS

$5.49/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 7 5800X

32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,329

In Stock

Updated 19 minutes ago

Centaurus Andromeda B9 Gaming Computer PC

226 FPS

$5. 92/FPS

Radeon RX 6600 XT

Ryzen 7 5800X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,337

In Stock

Updated 17 minutes ago

Centaurus Andromeda AX — AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core 4.4GHz TB, 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, Radeon RX 6800 16GB, 1TB NVMe SSD, Windows 11 Pro, WiFi. Tempered Glass, RGB LEDs. Custom Gaming Computer PC

278 FPS

$5.95/FPS

Radeon RX 6800

Ryzen 7 5800X

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,654

In Stock

Updated 15 minutes ago

Centaurus Archon A1X Gaming Computer PC

218 FPS

$6.28/FPS

Radeon RX 6600

Ryzen 7 5800X

8 GB, 500 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,369

In Stock

Updated 17 minutes ago

Centaurus Delta 3 Gaming Computer PC

241 FPS

$6.41/FPS

Radeon RX 6700 XT

Ryzen 7 5800X

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,545

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

HP OMEN Gaming Premium Desktop PC

273 FPS

$6. 41/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Ryzen 7 5800X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,749.99

In Stock

Updated 10 minutes ago

HP OMEN — Gaming Desktop PC

273 FPS

$6.52/FPS

GeForce RTX 3080

Ryzen 7 5800X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,779.99

In Stock

Updated 10 minutes ago

ROG Strix GA15DK Gaming Desktop PC

242 FPS

$6.59/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 7 5800X

16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,595.67

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC

242 FPS

$6.61/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 7 5800X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,599.99

In Stock

Updated 12 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 7 5800X

$256.5

Ryzen 7 5800X

$256.5

Ryzen 5 3600

$256.5

Ryzen 7 2700X

Ryzen 7 5800X

$256.5

Ryzen 7 3800X

$257.99

Ryzen 7 5800X

$256.5

Ryzen 5 2600X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 5 1600:

performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Which is better: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.2) or Ryzen 5 1600 at 3.2 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 3.6)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

Overview
Differences
Performance
Features
Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003

RYZEN 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600

Energy efficiency

Energy consumption chip

Ryzen 5 3600

RYZEN 5 1600 9000

RIGH

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600

Key differences

What are the main differences between 1600 and 3600

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3600

More modern process — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
Has 16MB more L3 cache
Supports up to 128GB DDR4-3200
rival
New PCI Express standard — 4.0
35% faster in Geekbench v5 single core test — 1252 and 930 points
17% faster Turbo Boost frequency (4.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz)
At 7.94 GB/s ( 20%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+44%

1287

Ryzen 5 1600

891

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+52%

9443

Ryzen 5 1600

6196

Passmark CPU (Single Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+24%

2562

Ryzen 5 1600

2071

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+46%

17787

Ryzen 5 1600

12188

Geekbench 5 (Single Core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+35%

1248

Ryzen 5 1600

922

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 3600
+39%

7087

Ryzen 5 1600

5099

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 1600 full technical specifications list

General information

Manufacturer	AMD	AMD
Release date	July 7, 2019	April 11, 2017
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Instruction set architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Matisse	Zen
Socket	AM4	AM4
Integrated graphics	No	No

Capacity

Number of cores	6	6
Number of threads	12	12
Frequency	3. 6 GHz	3.2 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost	4.2 GHz	3.6 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	36x	32x
Level 1 cache	64KB (per core)	96KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	512KB (per core)	512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	32MB (shared)	16MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors	3.8 billion	4.8 billion
Process	7 nanometers	14 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP)	65 W	65 W
Critical temperature	95°C	95°C

Memory support

Memory type	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2666
Max. size	128 GB	64 GB
Number of channels	2	2
Max. bandwidth	47.68 GB/s	39.74 GB/s
ECC support	Yes	Yes

Other

Official site	AMD Ryzen 5 3600 website	AMD Ryzen 5 1600 website
PCI Express Version	4.0	3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes	16	20

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Ryzen 5 3600

99 (76.2%)

Ryzen 5 1600

31 (23.8%)

Total votes: 130

Competitors

1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U and AMD Ryzen 5 3600

2.
Apple M1 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600

3.
Intel Core i5 12400F and AMD Ryzen 5 3600

4.
Intel Core i3 12100F and AMD Ryzen 5 3600

5.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600

6.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600

What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 5 3600?

Name

Message

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: What is the difference?

57 Ballla

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

61 BALLLA

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Winter when comparing

64 Facts compared to 9000 Is 1600 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?

192KB more L1 cache?
576KB vs 384KB
Supports memory debug code?

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600?

12.5% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3. 6GHz vs 6 x 3.2GHz
533MHz higher memory speed?
3200MHz vs 2667MHz
Semiconductor size 7nm smaller?
7nm vs 14nm
44.06% higher PassMark result?
17860 vs 12398
0.6GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.2GHz vs 3.6GHz
16MB more L3 cache?
32MB vs 16MB
1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3
4.98GB/s more memory bandwidth?
47.68GB/s vs 42.7GB/s

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 VS AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 VS AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 VS Ryzen 5 5600x

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 5600g

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 9000) VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS0003

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

9000 VS

AMD Ryzen 5 550000 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD Ryzen 550000 AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD Ryzen 5 4500u

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 4500

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 5 3

AMD RYZEN 5 4500U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i3-9100f

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core I5-9400F

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 9000 9000 9000 VS 9000 ATLZEN 5 1600 9000 9000 VS Core i3-10100F

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i3-12100

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 4600g

Price comparison

is cheaper0024

General rating

AMD RYZEN 5 1600

1 Reviews of users

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

10. 0 /10

1 Reviews Users

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000 9000 5 Reviews of Users 9000 AMD RYZEN

9.0 /10

5 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

7.0 /10

1 VOTES

9.2 /10

5 Votes

Games

10.0 /10

1 Votes

8.8 /10

4 Votes

Production

10.0 /10

1 Votes 9000 9000 9000 1 /10

5 Votes

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 Votes

/10

5 Votes

003

1 Votes

9.3 /10

4 Votes

Productivity

1. Ski -resistance of the central processor

6 x 3.2GHZ

6 x 3.6GHZ

The speed of the central processor shows how many processing cycles per second can be performed processor, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.6GHz

4.2GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2.67MB/core

5.33MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2667MHz

3200MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

42.7GB/s

47.68GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4 memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

310.8seconds

235seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

948.6seconds

705.9seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM) technology .

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

AMD Ryzen 5 1600, Ryzen 5 2600, Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 5600X test — i2HARD

Evgeny Serov

June 16, 2021

Tests of 4 generations of AMD Ryzen 5 processors in stock, overclocking and focusing on the video card

It’s time to follow the progress of the most popular and balanced Ryzen 600 series processors. Today, let’s look at how they behave in the stock state, in overclocking, and even indulge in a comparison at equal frequencies.

As many as 4 generations fit in one socket, and that’s not counting the APU!

test bench

Graphics Card #1: INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 ICHILL X3
Processor #1: AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Processor #2: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Processor #3: AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Processor #4: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard #1: MSI B450-A PRO
Motherboard #2: ASRock B550 Taichi Razer Edition
RAM #1: Crucial Ballistix 2×8 (BLS8G4D30AESCK)
RAM #2: G.Skill TRIDENT Z RGB [F4-3600C16D-16GTZR] 2×8 GB
Cooling system: Gamer Storm CASTLE 360RGB v2
Drives: SATA Samsung 860 EVO 500 GB x2
Body: Open Stand
Power Supply: DEEPCOOL DQ850-M-V2L

Unfortunately, most motherboards with the 300th series of chipsets did not receive support for the 5000th line, which is why not everyone got the opportunity to upgrade. More precisely, not only everyone, few people can do it.

And since we are talking about motherboards, then we will begin our acquaintance with the test bench with them. ASRock B550 Taichi Razer Edition, although it has all the necessary features to configure any Ryzen processor, was deprived of support — the first two generations were not familiar to her, so the MSI B450-A PRO MAX was useful for them. Now about processors.

Having mentioned the comparison of all ryzens of the 600th line, we did not leave the opportunity to surprise you with the list of contestants, however, it is worth clarifying a couple of points.

The Ryzen 1600 was imitated from the 1700th by disabling a couple of cores, since this has no negative consequences, since the volume of their caches is the same, and the boost per one core worked very badly for the first ryzens, its absence due to imitation will not affect to the result.

That is, in all cases, we will have regular versions of processors. 1600 AE, not AF, 2600 also without huge potential, like 3600, which, alas, does not take the cherished 4. 5 GHz.

Stock tests

We will start from the drain, and for processors of the zen and zen + microarchitecture, the XMP frequency of 3600 MHz of our RAM modules on SAMSUNG B-die chips is too high, so we will also postpone them until overclocking, and use the XMP of ordinary ballistics, which do not need to be introduced . All processors will be cooled by CBO Gamer Storm Castle 360RGB v2, RTX 3080 INNO3D ICHILL X3 was used as a graphics accelerator. The whole thing will be powered by a DeepCool DQ850-M-V2L power supply.

Progress with each new generation is not as simple as that of Intel. The Ryzens did not add cores or hyper-threading while maintaining the same microarchitecture. No. Let’s make a small table for convenience.

Wiping a mean tear, we turn to synthetics.

In the R23 bluebench, the Ryzen 5 3600 made the largest performance jump in a generation. It outperformed the 2600 by 25% in single thread and by 33% in multithread. 2600, in turn, showed the least progress.

In Geekbench, the gap between processors has been greatly reduced. If in the bluebench the 1600 and 5600X differed by more than 70%, now this number has decreased by more than 3 times for the multithreaded test.

CPU-Z falls somewhere in between in terms of sensitivity to changes in core performance.

At the same time, in Blender’s koro benchmark, the jump in Zen 2’s performance is amazing. Ryzen 3600 finished rendering the scene 72% faster compared to 2600. And this is with the same number of cores and threads!

As for the memory test and the caches of Aida, there were ups and downs here. For example, 1600 and 2600 practically do not differ either in cache speed or in memory speed, however, delays on all fronts are much lower in 2600. At 3600, the memory latency increased again, but the speed of the first level cache, and the rest, too. There were also features with the speed of writing to memory, which passed to the 5600X. On the other hand, the latency has fallen again, but this indicator from Aida is clearly overestimated and has only a relative dependence with real performance.

Let’s move on to games. war zone. eSports settings, recording was done with a capture card by a third-party computer. As mentioned, do not rely on the indicators of Hades, because. reducing the memory latency by 10 ns should have given a much larger increase to the 2600th, if you subtract from the 6% advantage the part that the higher frequency gave, there will be almost nothing left. The 5600X made a huge jump in performance, beating the 3600 by 33% while being a quarter faster than the 2600. In all cases, we get decent and stable FPS. But for monitors with a high refresh rate, the left processors in the drain will still not be enough.

Cyberpunk, ray tracing ultra preset, DLSS — ultra performance, crowd density to the maximum. And at these settings, the processors on the left side of the screen have difficulty and are barely distinguishable in essence. The 3600 gives a different experience, almost pulling out 60 frames, but given that even the 5600X dropped to 57 fps at some points, the crowd density should be reduced. As for the performance gap between the processors, after the warzone it decreased, especially for the 5600X. Now it’s as fast as the 3600 as it outperforms the 2600. 24% on average FPS

Next is Lara. The preset is the highest. 600r, measurement was made only in the third scene. Here again, the 5600X shows a significant lead over the 3600 around 35%, but this was due to the beginning of the scene, at the moment the gap has narrowed to about 25%. 1600 and 2600 differ by a couple of FPS, but here you can pay attention to temperatures. Although energy consumption sensors raise questions, temperatures will not let you lie. 7 nm did their job, greatly complicating heat removal due to the small size of the crystal. That is, even under the water cooling system, the 3600 and 5600 are more than 10 degrees hotter.

Watch Dogs Legion, ultra preset, performance dlss. We get FPS like in cyberpunk. Only here the beams were not turned on, and the density of the crowd cannot be reduced. For comfortable gameplay on the first two processors, you need either overclocking or a strong decrease in settings, and it’s not a fact that even at the minimum settings there will always be stable 60 frames. In this game, the 3600 showed the biggest jump in performance, beating the 2600 by 29% in average FPS. 5600X is now only 19 ahead%, which is still a great increase in just one generation, which cannot be said about its increased cost.

Starcraft 2, all settings to the maximum. When the game is only using 2 cores, the question of their performance becomes more relevant than ever, and the 2600 finally shows a good 14% lead over the 1600 in average frames. The 3600 outperformed it by 31%, and the 5600X leads the way with a whopping 42% lead over second place, making the 5600X more than double the 1600 in the end.

Total War Troy, graphics preset ultra, unit size and grass detail — extreme, resolution modifier — 50%. And now the results are exactly the opposite. That is, in Troy, the difference between processors is minimal. 1600 and 2600 differ by 3% in average fps, 5600X and 3600 — by 18%, and only 3600 retained its usual 25% advantage over 2600. But in one of the indicators it is straight ahead. core temperature. By as much as 20 C, it is hotter than the opponents on the left, and even the 5600X nervously smokes on the sidelines. Fortunately, his tensions are in much calmer limits.

CS:GO. Settings to minimum, anti-aliasing to maximum. As in StarCraft, the 5600X again took off with might and main, surpassing its father by almost 40% and its great-grandfather by 120%. 2600 this time went 20% ahead of 1600, hinting at the usefulness of the additional payment for oneself. In previous tests, these processors were so similar that at one time an additional fee of a thousand or two did not seem justified.

On average, we have fairly even results in the ward in the sense that as far as the average FPS grew, the smaller 1 and 0.1% grew approximately the same. And thanks to low-flow starcraft with counter 2600, on average, it is 8% faster than 1600, without them 4-5% would have come out.

Overclocking tests

Now acceleration. We replace ballistics with bidai, and here everything is according to the usual scheme. 5600X overclocked via Curve Optimizer with removal of all limits along the way, memory is also according to the standard for 3800 MHz bi-dais with the first timing of 14.3866 MHz and higher are unstable, they have already been checked on 4 boards, system errors pop up everywhere.

The ryzen 3600 cores are fixed at 4375 MHz, and the memory is configured exactly the same as on the 5600X.

Our 2600 stars from the sky are not enough. 4100 MHz came out by cores, and the best memory setting option is 3333 MHz with the first timing of 12. CL13 is not set, since our modules are unstable with Gear Down Mode disabled, and 3533 MHz CL14 is obviously worse. 3600 MHz and above are not stable on this motherboard.

For 1600, the memory overclocking is the same, and the cores were taken 200 MHz lower at the same voltage. That is, in general, there is an increase in the potential for overclocking memory and cores. Somehow I even forgot how problematic the memory setup was on the first two generations.

In Hades, nothing has changed globally, the ratios of delays, speeds, and the like have remained within the same limits. Except that the L3 speed of the 5600X has grown a lot, which raises questions rather to hell. Well, again we see a much lower latency in 2600 compared to 1600, but from the games we already realized that we need to be careful about this indicator.

In the bluebench, the Ryzen 1600’s lag has narrowed. It is not surprising — he increased his frequency the most with overclocking.

In geekbench and CPU-Z, the same is true, as well as in the blender subtest — koro. The gap has only slightly narrowed. With each new generation, progress is being made in squeezing all the juice out of the processor. Even the ghostly 3300X out of the box had almost maximum frequencies, and now we are comparing overclocking options for 5000th ryzens, although we ourselves understand that we are only squeezing out an additional 200 MHz for show. The main performance boost comes with memory tuning, increasing the frequency of infinity factories and removing limits from the processor.

We return to the warzone and see an excellent FPS. And so, it would seem that the 5600X has no core overclocking at all, and a large cache should have reduced the gain from memory overclocking, but the difference with the gain for other processors is not so great. Compared to stock, 5600X accelerated by 22%, and 1600 — by 24%, but this is a warzone, where the error is quite high, we will continue to monitor.

In cyberpunk, overclocking gave noticeably more. And the increase is almost equal. The average FPS has increased by a third in all cases, making the gameplay much more enjoyable. 1600 in stock and overclocked are completely different processors. In fact, on it we got the same fps that the 3600 had in stock. The overclocked 3600 is a little faster than the stock 5600X, which means that with a little effort, you can get a more expensive processor. Well, you already know this, initially this was the meaning of domestic overclocking.

Differences appeared in the chest. 2600 increased all indicators again by a third, but other processors are lagging behind. In 1600 and 3600, the increase from overclocking varies in the region of 27-28%, while in 5600X it is the least — 25%. But even so, the differences in sensations between the processors have not changed. Between 1600 and 2600, although the difference has grown, it is still incredibly difficult to distinguish them without monitoring, and 3600 and 5600X are still far ahead.

The situation is similar in dogs. 2600 began to prepare a third more frames per second, and for the rest of the ryzens this figure increased by a little more than a quarter, but even so, the gameplay on the 1600th, like in cyberpunk, became much more comfortable.

But in StarCraft, the balance of power has leveled off a bit. 1600 received the largest increase among all participants. Its FPS increased by 27% compared to the stock, in 2600 — by 24%, 3600 — only by 20%, and 5600X accelerated by only 15%. That is, the voluminous integral 32-megabyte L3 cache could just have an effect here, and the frequency of its cores has grown nothing at all.

In Troy, the results are similar to lara and dogs. 2600 increased its fps by 30%, and the rest by a quarter. Temperatures have also risen markedly. Previously, in 1600 and 2600 they were in the region of 40C, and now they are about 60. This is far from the limit, which allows you to easily use ordinary four-pipe towers for cooling, as long as the case is ventilated. 3600 and 5600X are 10C hotter, and something simpler than the aforementioned coolers will not be enough for them, or you will have to change overclocking to a less aggressive one.

The most interesting event happened in counter. The 5600X did not benefit from memory overclocking. His fps increased a little thanks to the whore settings, but no more. That is, we can assume that the misses in its large cache have come to naught. However, judging by the fact that in multi-threaded games overclocking gave about the same numbers as 1600 ryzen, the amount of cache for modern massive games is so small for modern massive games that misses happen all the time. Here, as in Starcraft, 1600 received an increase from overclocking as 2600 and 3600 combined — 25%. Their FPS increased by 12 and 13% respectively, which again reduced the difference between 1600 and 2600 to a minimum.

We go back into the ward with average values and see that nothing has changed much. Yes, now the 5600X is on average not 79% faster, but 69% faster, but this is still a huge difference, and the first two generations still differ by less than 10%, except that now their gap has become more even from game to game, and in overclocking it is almost impossible to distinguish them even in Starcraft and Counter.

GPU Focused Benchmarks

These were tests without emphasis on the video card. In such conditions, the 3600 and 5600X are head and shoulders above their ancestors, however, in many story single games, the emphasis is on the video card, whatever it is. And adjusting the FPS to the value of “at least 60”, only the resolution and preset settings change. What are the differences in this case?

Indeed, starting from the 3000 series, resizable bar and PCI Express 4 versions became available. Let’s quickly run through three games, leaving the RTX 3080 in the booth and the processors overclocked.

In cyberpunk, we change the resolution to 4k, the settings preset to the penultimate one and the dlss to performance. We will also change the scene to the night one, it has higher requirements for the video card and less for the processor part. Here the Resizable Bar gives a boost, which is seen between the risers in the center.

DOOM Eternal, graphics preset — ultra nightmare, 4K. All the same. The Resizable Bar gives the minimum difference in average FPS, but in addition there are differences in the amount of stutters during automatic saves, which is why the smaller 0.1% differs. Is this a reason for an upgrade? Of course not.

Resident Evil 8, the maximum graphics preset will be seasoned with an average RTX level, the resolution is still Ultra HD. Here, the Resizable Bar does not give an increase, which reduces the already intangible difference to nothing. That is, for those players who are content with 60 fps in single games, whether it be 1060 in Full HD or 3080 in 4K, there is not much difference. It will appear only in very demanding games up to the processor, in the stock state, or if you want to achieve more than 60 fps. As for the lack of Resizable Bar and the obsolete PCI version, today the loss is small. And the desire to unscrew the settings to the maximum is sometimes absurd.

Look, there is a trace on one half, but not on the other. Try to guess in the comments where it is and why you think so. And we’re moving on to the last part.

Let’s compare processors at equal frequencies and voltages. This is not an IPC comparison, but mostly overindulgence, but it’s interesting how much performance has increased, all other things being equal, and what’s with the temperatures.

For example, in the bluebench, Ryzen 2600 still scored more points than 1600, and the most interesting thing is that in multithreading, all processors have a greater lead, as if SMT work also improved with each generation, but we don’t dare to pass off our fictions as truth. There are dozens of reasons for this behavior.

In geekbench, on the contrary, in multithreading, the difference is less, but here it is easily explained by slow memory and algorithms for calculating the points of the test itself.

CPU-Z turned out to be the most amorphous, here 1600 and 5600X differ in multithreading by only 16%,

But in the Coro benchmark subtest, the 3600 blender still demonstrates a huge lead over its ancestors.

In Aida, memory latency remains unchanged, but the equal frequency made it clear that the cache speeds are the same for both zen with zen +, and for zen 2 with zen 3.

Let’s also take a look at the top three games to see how they were affected by microarchitectural improvements without taking into account the change in frequency.

For example, in Watch Dogs, the stock 5600X outperformed the 1600 by 57% in average FPS, and now only by 45%. And what’s funny, reducing the frequency of the cores by about 800 MHz led to the loss of only three frames on average, that is, a 4% drop in FPS, which is generally ridiculous.

But in StarCraft, instead of 78 fps, we got 62 on 5600X. Which corresponds to a 20% drop in core frequency. Well, the 5600X now exceeds the 1600 by no more than 2 times, but only 1.5 times, which is also very commendable.

In three runs, the 1600 and 2600 are equal in average FPS, but in rare and very rare events, the refresh is ahead, and the 3600 and 5600X step identically in performance. At equal voltages, power consumption sensors show some kind of rubbish that is not amenable to analytics, but by temperatures it is quite possible to judge that the right processors are similar to each other in terms of core temperature at equal voltage, just like the left ones are identical to each other, but the transition to 7 nm is a priori significantly complicates the removal of heat from the crystal.

Conclusion

This is how the Ryzens progressed. The 2000s were only a small improvement over the 1st generation, and the 3000s made a huge breakthrough, a breakthrough. On the other hand, Zen 3, while remaining on the same process technology and socket, also made a great jump in performance, especially in terms of gaming, sometimes identical to that of the 3600.

And before you close the material, share this in the comments: there is someone among you who planned an upgrade, but after this video he changed his mind, and vice versa. Very curious to see your thoughts. Well, about the tracing in the resident, also try to guess.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed in office use

Ryzen 5 3600

74.1 (+13.9%)

Ryzen 5 1600

63.8

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. 9Ryzen 5

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Ryzen 5 1600

15.4

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1250 (+28%)

AMD RYZEN 5 1600

900 9000

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

197 197

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

14000 9000,0002 14000 9000,0002 14000 9000,0002,0002,0002,0002,0002 14000

9000

,0002,0002,0002,0002,0002,0002,0002,0002,0003

14000

Core

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

1578 (+30. 7%)

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

1094

Basic

Manufacturer	AMD	AMD
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption.	No data	No data
Date of Issue The month and year the processor was released.	10-2021	09-2019
Model Official name.
Cores The number of physical cores.	6	6
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	12	12
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technologies, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).	SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	3.6 GHz	3.2 GHz
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	4.15	No data
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume.	No data	No data
Instructions
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No	No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	No data	No data
Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle.	No data	No data
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency.	No data	No data
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.

RAM

Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor.	No data	No data
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.
RAM bandwidth
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread.	No data	No data

PCI

PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.	No data	No data
PCI configuration options
Number of PCI lanes	No data

Data Security

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption.	No data	No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator.	No data	No data

Decoration

Dimensions	No data	No data
Supported sockets	No data	No data
Maximum processors per motherboard	No data	No data

Which is better

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

On average, gaming performance is 10% better.
The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 10%.
In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 4%.
The base frequency is 0.4 GHz higher.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

$69 down

Similar to

The number of physical cores is equal.
The number of threads is equal.

top in its segment? GECID.com. Page 1

::>Processors
>2021
> AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF

20-01-2021

Page 1
Page 2
One page

Ryzen 5000 series processors are good, but not cheap. The most affordable Ryzen 5 5600X was priced at $299, although at the start it costs well over $300. However, over the years, AMD has released a number of less powerful and cheaper chips. Let’s check how good they are in modern conditions and is there a reserve for the future?

They wanted to start with the budget Ryzen 3 1200 AF, but 4 cores in 4 threads for heavy games is already not enough, and the chip itself has practically disappeared from sales.

Therefore, the cycle opens the 6-core Ryzen 5 1600 AF . The original version was released in 2017 based on the 14nm Zen architecture, and the model with the AF prefix was released at the end of 2019. At its heart is a 12nm Zen+ with improved power efficiency and more stable high-frequency support. The package includes a low-profile Wraith Stealth cooler instead of the Wraith Spire.

No change in performance. We have 6 cores in 12 threads with a base frequency of 3.2 GHz and dynamic overclocking to 3.6 GHz. The L3 cache is 16MB and the TDP is 65W. By tradition, the multiplier is unlocked, and this is very good — overclocking this chip will not hurt. The maximum temperature is declared at level 95°C.

To speed up the Ryzen 5 1600 AF and keep it at operating temperature, the 2-section dropsy Antec Neptune 240 with bright addressable RGB backlight helped. It has a fairly compact water block, because the engineers placed the pump next to the radiator to protect the processor from the negative effects of vibrations.

Nominally Ryzen 5 1600 AF can be classified as the second generation, but boards based on AMD A520 and B550 chipsets do not support it. Taking something for it on the X570 is too bold if you don’t plan to upgrade to the Ryzen 5000 series later. So we took a simpler and cheaper MSI B450M Mortar Max . We liked it with a reinforced power subsystem and improved cooling — just right for overclocking. There are also two M.2 slots and one PCIe x16 slot with a reinforced design for a massive graphics card.

RAM is presented in two sets. In the first part of the tests, we simulate the option when the memory is taken cheaper. The 16 GB kit DDR4-3000 Exceleram Red Kudos helped us with this.

In the second part, the RAM will be overclocked. With cheap sets, it’s always a lottery and extra time to select timings. So we took the 16 GB kit DDR4-3600 GOODRAM IRDM to simplify our lives and speed up the release of this material.

We could have taken the RTX 3090 as a video card, but the power supply needed for it was not at hand. Limited to model MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO , for which thanks to the store Telemart.ua . Its performance is enough for test processors in Full HD. The RTX 2080 Ti itself is at the level of the RTX 3070 and slightly slower than the RX 6800.

The operating system and demanding games were installed on a fast M.2 SSD ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1 TB. The rest of the projects were already recorded on the 2.5″ 2TB ADATA SU800 to speed up the process.

Unit 9 provided stable power supply to all components1953 Seasonic FOCUS GX-650 with 80 PLUS Gold efficiency certificate. It boasts one powerful +12V line, high-quality and reliable components inside, a fully modular design, a quiet and durable 135mm FDB-bearing fan and a full list of protections. By the way, the turntable can work in hybrid mode so that you can enjoy quietness at low load.

The entire system was assembled in the recently reviewed Vinga Wingman case. It has an excellent ratio of price, design and convenience. Inside, EATX format motherboards and more compact ones, video cards up to 350 mm long and CPU coolers up to 165 mm high will fit without any problems. If desired, you can place several dropsies of up to 360 mm format.

True, there are absolutely no case fans in the kit. We fixed this problem with four Vinga LED fan-02 red . They are relatively inexpensive, have a nice design and backlight, and are based on a reliable hydrodynamic bearing.

Gameplay recorded by external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K without loss of performance. Inside the PC, it occupies one PCIe x4 slot, and in the set of external interfaces it has two HDMIs: one for the input signal from the desktop or game console, and the second for parallel output of the video stream to the screen.

At the first stage of testing, we decided to compare the results at nominal and overclocked. The processor frequency was raised to 4.1 GHz. To do this, the BIOS increased the multiplier to 41, the CPU Core Voltage to 1.4 V and the CPU NB / SoC Voltage to 1.2 V. The RAM was accelerated to 3400 MHz at a voltage of 1.35 V. You may be able to achieve better results at lower voltages, but we just didn’t have time to fine-tune the parameters.

In this mode, the system passed the combination of AIDA64 and FurMark stress tests without any problems. The maximum temperature of the CPU cores reached 88°C, and the GPU warmed up to 71°C.

Let’s start with a few synthetic benchmarks. Overclocking the processor and RAM had practically no effect on the results in those tests where the video card plays the main role. This is clearly seen in 3DMark Port Royal, Time Spy and SUPERPOSITION.

Well, where the processor or RAM plays an important role, overclocking brings a 10-14% bonus. This can be seen in CineBench R15, CineBench R20 and GeekBench 5.

On average, we get a 9% bonus in synthetics. Not much, but thanks for that.

In gaming benchmarks, the situation is as follows. In Gears 5 , the average speed after overclocking improved by 9%, and the rate of very rare events increased by another 10%.

In RDR 2 at high settings we again see an average frame rate increase of 10%. Rare and very rare events increased by more than 2 times — here the benchmark obviously messed up at face value, but there was no time to reset overclocking and double-check. Please understand and forgive.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider at the maximum preset, the system copes well even at nominal, but overclocking adds another 13-14% on top.

CPU-demanding Total War Saga: Troy at the maximum preset was even more generous — the gain after overclocking was in the region of 15-20%.

And here is the benchmark World of Tanks enCore turned out to be the most indifferent to processor overclocking — only 3-8% gain. This is understandable — after all, tanks are not particularly demanding on the system.

In general, the increase was 10-12%. In heavy resource-intensive projects, it will be higher, and in simpler ones, you can do without overclocking at all.

AMD Ryzen 5 Processor Review 3600

Rate

Read the article:
12 139

Content in this review, not everyone is ready to fork out for them. In the new line of AMD processors, the Ryzen 5 3600 model for $200 can be considered the best in terms of cost and speed. It uses 6 processing cores and supports 12 instruction streams. The processor operates at a clock frequency between 3.6 and 4.2 GHz, has 32 MB L3 cache, and a TDP of 65 watts. Wraith Stealth fan included, MSRP matches last year’s Ryzen R5 2600.

Read also: review of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3700X processors.

The direct competitor of the new processor is the Intel Core i5-9600 model priced at $213. Unfortunately, it was not in the hands of the authors of the review; it is also not easy to find it on sale. Therefore, we had to compare it with the more expensive 9600K model. This chip costs $255 and does not come with a fan. With this in mind, you need to make an adjustment for performance comparisons, but you can always perform an analysis of the speed of work per unit cost.

Benchmarks

Let’s start with the Cinebench R20 multi-core test, where the R5 3600 immediately performs great. It performs on par with the Ryzen 7 1800X, scoring over 3600 points. That’s 4% faster than the 8700K, 20% faster than the 2600X, and 28% faster than the R5 2600.

Compared to the R5 1600, the new model is 45% faster. This is a very noticeable increase in productivity over 2 years, it is almost 50%.

Single-core performance is just as impressive. The 3600 is 4% slower than the 3700X. It is on par with the Core i5-9600K and slightly ahead of the 8700K.

WinRAR R5 3600 also looks good, only 4% behind 8700K. But it is 45% superior to the Core i7-7700K and Ryzen 7 2700X.

7-zip shows the superiority of the 3600 over the 2700X. The compression performance is excellent, 14% better than the 8700K. It is lower than 8-core Ryzen processors in decompression tests. Even then, the speed is 16% faster than the 8700K.

For content creators, the new processor will be a real treat. For just $200, it processes 4K video 4% faster than the 8700K. The difference is small, only this Intel chip costs $360.

In V-Ray, compared to the R5 2600, the speed of the 3600 is 18% higher, 32% faster than the R5 1600. Up to 8700K, the AMD processor falls short here, yielding 6%.

There is also a slight lag behind this chip in the Corona benchmark. Considering the price, the difference is minimal; per unit cost, the AMD processor is better.

On the other hand, the 3600 takes its toll in the Blender test. It outperforms the 8700K and past Ryzens, as well as the 9600K. The latter is generally at the bottom of the table.

Power consumption

What’s even more impressive is the system power consumption in the Blender benchmark. The R5 3600 processor consumes the same amount as the 4-core Core i7-7700K and only slightly more than the i5-9600K.

It may seem that the slightly higher consumption compared to the 9600K is not a particularly interesting value. However, the performance of the 3600 is 40% higher. This means much more energy efficiency.

Game tests

Let’s start with Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey. Here the R5 3600 slightly outperforms the 8700K in the 1% worst results. And yet, on average, there is a lag of several frames.

We can say that there is a draw between these processors in this game.

As with the R9 3900X and 3700X, AMD’s processor performs slightly worse at 1440p. It lags behind the 8700K by 6%, although the difference usually cancels out.

Battlefield 5 results are a little disappointing, although the 3600 doesn’t directly compete with the 8700K. Its main target should be cpu 9600K and here performance in the bottom 1% is 23% better.

Even at 1440p, although the 9600K is faster in average frame rates, the 3600 has an 18% lead in the bottom 1% of the results. This allows you to provide a smoother and more stable picture.

Next comes Shadow of The Tomb Raider. Here 3600 corresponds to 9600K, which, considering the price, is a good result. At 1440p, the results are largely the same, with the 9600K only a few frames ahead, but the bottom 3600 results are better compared to second-gen Ryzen processors.

The Division 2 game. At 1080p, the R5 3600 outperforms the 9600K and not only the 2600X, but even the more powerful 2700X. This time around, at 1440p, the Ryzen 3600 is even further ahead of the 9600K at the bottom of the performance. The processor also outperforms the 2700X and 8700K, performing on par with the 8-core 3700X.

In Far Cry New Dawn, performance does not look good compared to Intel chips. However, this does not interfere with getting a smooth gameplay. Even at 1440p, the R5 3600 falls noticeably behind the 9600K, including in the lower numbers.

World War Z is also lagging behind Intel processors. However, when the frame rate goes over 100 fps, it doesn’t really matter. In this game, the Ryzen processor can be called the bottleneck of the system and at 1440p the limit is 135 fps. Intel processors are capable of showing more than 150 fps.

Rage 2 Risen 5 3600 averages 160 fps. It’s slightly slower than 9600K. The AMD processor is fast enough to survive the maximum of an RTX 2080 Ti at 1440p, although the same can be said for almost all processors tested.

In Hitman 2 R5, the 3600 is 7% behind the 9600K in average frame rates. Thus, this game is also not too fond of AMD processors.

Similar results are observed at 1440p, although here the lower performance of 3600 corresponds to 9600K.

Finally, the last game is Total War: Three Kingdoms. Here, the lower performance of the R5 3600 is stronger compared to the 9600K, but the average frame rate is slightly lower. At 1440p, the performance of the graphics card cancels out the difference between the two processors.

Overclocking

As was the case with the 3700X and 3900X models, the Ryzen R5 3600 has very little room for overclocking. The best result with liquid cooling was 4 GHz on all cores. In the Ryzen Master program, it is desirable to disable the PBO + AutoOC function. As a result, in the Cinebench R20 multi-core test, the performance gain was only 4%.

PBO + AutoOC only improves single-core performance by 1.6%, so overclocking makes little sense, but heat increases.

Temperatures

With the Wraith Stealth fan installed, the processor runs at 4 GHz for an hour in the Blender test. These are extreme loads, so a temperature of 80 degrees is a good result, especially considering the quiet operation of the cooling system.

With a boxed cooler, PBO can be enabled, but that doesn’t change much. The frequency increased by only 25 MHz, and the temperature increased by 4 degrees.

If you install a better cooler, the temperature may drop noticeably. Not necessarily something extreme like the Corsair Hydro h215i. However, this cooling was used in the tests of the 3700X and it is interesting to compare the result. With the installation of AIO liquid cooling, the temperature dropped to 62 degrees and now the processor was running at a frequency of 4125 MHz. This means 3% automatic overclocking. If you turn on PBO, you can throw another 85 MHz, but the temperature rises to 68 degrees.

Cost per frame

To calculate this parameter, the cost of an optional fan for Intel processors has been added. An inexpensive Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition was taken at a price of $40. As a result, the cost of the Core i5-9600K is $295, and the cost per frame is $2.18. This is on par with the Ryzen 7 2700X.

Ryzen 5 3600 costs significantly less, only $1.53 per frame. At the same time, the level of performance here is approximately the same as that of the two above-mentioned models, but the price is $100 less. As a result, the value of the R5 3600 is higher than the 2600X with its current retail price of $19.5. True, the 3600 is 18% more expensive than the R5 2600. Even so, given the increased efficiency of the processor and a significant increase in its performance, a small increase in cost per frame can be justified.

Conclusion

As expected, the Ryzen 5 3600 offers excellent value for money. Even simple motherboards based on the B350 chipset are enough for it, if you update the BIOS there. Or you can buy a motherboard based on the more modern B450 chipset and get a killer combination for not much more than $300. It’s about the same price as 9600K with medium cooler.

At the same time, if desired, it will be possible to put Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 9 3900X or even 16-core 3950X processors on such a motherboard in the future. Who knows what motherboards and processors in a few years will be sold with hands at a low price. That is why the AMD AM4 platform is so attractive. Those who bought inexpensive B350 motherboards two years ago and a processor like the Ryzen 5 1600 now have the opportunity to install an R5 3600 chip with a 35% performance increase in games and at least 45% in applications. In programs like WinRAR, the speed even increased by more than 100%.

Even if building a computer from scratch, the R5 3600 seems to be the best option. In all applications, this processor is ahead of the Core i5-9600K and even in the worst case, single-core performance is comparable. You’ll get 12 instruction streams versus 6, making this chip last longer.

The Intel Core i5-9600K was slightly faster in a few games, but otherwise the R5 3600 was much faster.