Intel Core i3 7100U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i3 7100U
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.4 GHz Intel Core i3 7100U with 2-cores against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i3 7100U
28
Ryzen 5 2500U
37
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i3 7100U
6
Ryzen 5 2500U
13
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i3 7100U
58
Ryzen 5 2500U
58
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i3 7100U
25
Ryzen 5 2500U
34
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2500U and 7100U
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 1 MB larger L3 cache size
- 28% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 787 vs 615 points
- Newer — released 1-year and 2-months later
- Around 1.
66 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i3 7100U
566
Ryzen 5 2500U
+42%
804
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i3 7100U
1181
Ryzen 5 2500U
+143%
2866
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i3 7100U
1403
Ryzen 5 2500U
+32%
1846
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i3 7100U
2743
Ryzen 5 2500U
+139%
6568
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i3 7100U
618
Ryzen 5 2500U
+28%
793
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i3 7100U
1393
Ryzen 5 2500U
+98%
2754
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i3 7100U and AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
General
Vendor | Intel | AMD |
Released | August 30, 2016 | October 26, 2017 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Kaby Lake | Raven Ridge |
Model number | i3-7100U | — |
Socket | BGA-1356 | FP5 |
Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 620 | Radeon Vega 8 |
Performance
Cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base Frequency | 2.![]() |
2.0 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency | — | 3.6 GHz |
Bus frequency | — | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 24x | 20x |
Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | — |
L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 128K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 3MB (shared) | 4MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Transistors | — | 4.9 billions |
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
TDP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max.![]() |
100°C | 95°C |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon Vega 8 |
GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
GPU Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Shading Units | 192 | 512 |
TMUs | 24 | 32 |
ROPs | 3 | 8 |
Execution Units | 24 | 8 |
TGP | 15 W | 65 W |
Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | 3840×2160 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i3 7100U
0.4 TFLOPS
Ryzen 5 2500U
1.13 TFLOPS
Memory support
Memory types | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2400 |
Memory Size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
Max.![]() |
2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 35.76 GB/s |
ECC Support | No | Yes |
Official site | Intel Core i3 7100U official page | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i3 7100U
0 (0%)
Ryzen 5 2500U
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U or Intel Core i3 7100U?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs Intel Core i3-7100U
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs Intel Core i3-7100U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U on one side and the Intel Core i3-7100U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the thin and light laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the mainstream-class laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | Intel Core i3-7100U | ||||||
Market (main) | Thin and light laptop | Mainstream-class laptop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen | Kaby Lake | ||||||
Core name | Raven Ridge | Kaby Lake-U | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 5 2000 | Core i3-7000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | YM2500C4T4MFB | FJ8067702739738, SR2ZW, SR343 |
||||||
Release date | Q4 2017 | Q3 2016 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm+ | ||||||
Transistors | 4.![]() |
— | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 2 | ||||||
Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
Base frequency | 2,0 GHz | 2,4 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,6 GHz | — | ||||||
Cache memory | 4 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 35,76 GB/s | 34,1 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Raven) | Intel HD Graphics 620 | ||||||
GPU cores | 8 | — | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 512 | 192 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 1.![]() |
403,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | FP5 | BGA1356 | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 337 | 246 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 1.818 | 708 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 137 | 95 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 609 | 259 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 1.831 | 1.383 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 6.568 | 2.![]() |
||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.138 | 2.799 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
8.623 | 5.400 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
116,9 GFLOPS | 93,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
575 pts / W | 360 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500U has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 2500U was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
337 1.818 |
Intel Core i3-7100U |
246 708 |
In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 157%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
137 609 |
Intel Core i3-7100U |
95 259 |
In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 135%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
1.831 6.568 |
Intel Core i3-7100U |
1.383 2.692 |
In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 144%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
3.138 8.623 |
Intel Core i3-7100U |
2.799 5.400 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 60%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
3. ![]() 8.517 |
Intel Core i3-7100U |
2.982 5.050 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 69%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
4.236 11.929 |
Intel Core i3-7100U |
2.890 5.386 |
In single core, the difference is 47%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 121%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.