Ryzen 5 2600 v: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-9300H vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Built-in video — specifications

General parameters of the integrated video card in the Ryzen 5 2600.

Peripherals

Ryzen 5 2600 supported peripherals and how to connect them.

Tests in benchmark

1

These are the results of the Ryzen 5 2600 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall benchmark performance

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600
10.66

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
• Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1
• WinRAR 4.0

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

Ryzen 5 2600
13234

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Ryzen 5 2600
1138

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Ryzen 5 2600
4815

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 2600
4726

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 2600
28173

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 2600
9290

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 2600
14

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all CPU threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 2600
1248

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 2600
157

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 2600
1.8

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2600
8

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 5 2600
75

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 5 2600
205

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 5 2600
4517

Relative capacity

Overall performance of the Ryzen 5 2600 compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
100.19

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
100.09

AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516
100

AMD Ryzen 5 2600
100

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
98.78

Intel Core i5-10400F
98.5

AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
98.41

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 2600 from Intel is Core i7-9700, which is 1% faster on average and higher by 6 positions in our rating.

Core i7
9700

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the Ryzen 5 2600:

Intel Core i5-11400T
100.94

Intel Core i5-11500T
100. 84

Intel Core i7-9700
100.66

AMD Ryzen 5 2600
100

Intel Core i5-10400F
98.5

Intel Core i3-12100T
98.31

Intel Core i7-8700
98.03

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Ryzen
Embedded V2516

Compare

Ryzen 5
3500X

Compare

Ryzen 5
PRO 2600

Compare

Core i7
9700

Compare

Core i5
11500T

Compare

Core i5
11400T

Compare

Best graphics cards for Ryzen 5 2600

There are 61255 Ryzen 5 2600 based graphics cards in our database.

According to statistics, these cards are most often used with Ryzen 5 2600:

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

8.8%

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

8.2%

GeForce GTX
1650

8.1%

Radeon RX
580

7.2%

GeForce GTX
1650 SUPER

6.2%

Radeon RX
570

6%

GeForce GTX
1660

4.8%

GeForce GTX
1060 6GB

4.7%

GeForce RTX
2060

3. 1%

GeForce GTX
1060 3GB

3.1%

Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with the Ryzen 5 2600 according to user statistics:

GeForce RTX
4090

0.2% (103/61255)

GeForce RTX
4080

0.007% (4/61255)

GeForce RTX
4070 Ti

0.002% (1/61255)

GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

0.1% (83/61255)

Radeon RX
6950XT

0.01% (8/61255)

Radeon RX
7900XT

0.003% (2/61255)

GeForce RTX
3080 Ti

0. 2% (127/61255)

GeForce RTX
3090

0.3% (177/61255)

Radeon RX
6900XT

0.09% (55/61255)

GeForce RTX
3080 12GB

0.007% (4/61255)

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.

Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the Ryzen 5 2600 processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 3 3200G:

performance comparison

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Which is better: 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 2600 at 3.4 GHz or Ryzen 3 3200G with 4 cores at 3. 6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 12nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

1. Overview
2. Differences
3. Performance
4. Features
5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single-threaded performance

Rating in tests using a single core

Ryzen 5 2600

47

Ryzen 3 3200G

943

Multi-threaded performance

0002 Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei are involved in all the nuclei

Ryzen 5 2600

29

Ryzen 3 3200G

15,0005

Energy efficiency

RYZEN 5 2600 9000 9000,0002,0002 Ryzen 3 3200

Ryzen 3 3,0002 RyZen

NanoReview Rating

Final CPU Score

Ryzen 5 2600

42

Ryzen 3 3200G

37

Key differences

What are the main differences between 3200G and 2600

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600

• Has 12 MB more L3 cache
• Has 2 physical cores more
• 16% faster in single core Geekbench v5 — 1038 and 897 points

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

• Appeared 1 year later than the rival
• There is an integrated graphics accelerator Radeon Vega 8
• GHz)

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Ryzen 5 2600
+7%

1003

Ryzen 3 3200G

940

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 2600
+114%

7046

Ryzen 3 3200G

3293

Passmark CPU (Single Core)

Ryzen 5 2600
+1%

2233

Ryzen 3 3200G

2217

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 2600
+85%

13160

Ryzen 3 3200G

7125

Geekbench 5 (Single Core)

Ryzen 5 2600
+15%

1029

Ryzen 3 3200G

894

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Ryzen 5 2600
+84%

5634

Ryzen 3 3200G

3054

Add your Cinebench R23 results

Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 3 3200G full technical specifications list

General information

Processor

Performance Cores

Core	6	4
threads	12	4
Frequency	3. 4 GHz	3.6 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost	3.9 GHz	4 GHz

Integrated graphics	—	Radeon Vega 8
GPU frequency	—	300 MHz
Boost GPU frequency	—	1250 MHz
Shader blocks	—	512
TMUs	—	32
ROPs	—	8
Computer units	—	8
TGP	—	65 W
Max. resolution	—	3840×2160 — 60Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Ryzen 5 2600

n/a

Ryzen 3 3200G

1.13 teraflops

memory support 7