AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 2000 | Ryzen 5 1000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
YD2600BBM6IAF |
YD1600BBAFBOX |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,4 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 16 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2933 |
DDR4-2667 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 39,74 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 438 | 445 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 3. 542 |
3.689 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 161 | 154 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.384 | 1.245 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.022 | 915 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 8.126 | 6.603 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.243 | 2.088 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 13.215 | 12.346 | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
445 3.689 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
438 3.542 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
161 1.  384 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
154 1.245 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
1.022 8.  126 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
915 6.603 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
2.  24313.215 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF |
2.088 12.346 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Nick Miller
We compare two 6-core desktop CPUs: the 3.
4 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2600 against the 3.2 GHz Ryzen 5 1600. We did a proper research and compare both according to Speed, Overclocking, and Gaming performance features .
Ryzen 5 2600
View Latest Price
Critic Reviews
“Ryzen 5 bring AMD back into the game as they deliver high-performance multi-threaded computing at prices that will be a major disruption to the competition.”by Vortez
Ryzen 5 1600
View Latest Price
Critic Reviews
“AMD Ryzen 5 2600 delivers excellent performance when it comes to games and productivity applications. It is also a great choice if you are building your own PC in a compact case since it has a 65W TDP. The Ryzen 5 2600 is more than just a quality gaming CPU; with its multi-threaded chops, it also has a good value chip.”by TheStreamingBlog
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 5 1600
General
| Vendor | AMD | AMD |
| Released | September 11, 2018 | April 11, 2017 |
| Launch price | 199 USD | 219 USD |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Codename | Zen+ | Zen |
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 4 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 34x | 32x |
| L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power
| Transistors | 4.8 billions | 4.8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Max. temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth |
43.71 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
Misc
| Official site | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 official page | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advantages of buying Ryzen 5 2600
- Better fabrication process-12nm vs 14nm
- Better Turbo Boost frequency- 3.9GHz vs 3.6GHz
- Best theoretical memory bandwidths
- Superior RAM type
Contents
- Ryzen 5 2600 Features
- Ryzen 5 1600 Features
- The Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 5 2600?
- Result
Ryzen 5 2600 Features
The Ryzen 5 2600 is one of the most efficient and reasonably priced processors released by AMD over the past years. It offers excellent performance in both gaming and multitasking.
Its higher-core count and multi-threading support make sure to handle heavy workloads without any hassle and provide a competitive gaming performance.
The Ryzen 2600 is built on a 12nm manufacturing process based on AMD’s Zen+ architecture that features 6 exceptional multi-threaded cores. Each core executes two threads at a time, making a total of 12 threads.
The six multi-threaded cores help it clock up to 3.4GHz on the Base frequency and 3.9GHz on Turbo boost frequency. It also features unlocked multipliers, which means that you can overclock it to squeeze out more performance, but the bundled Wraith Stealth stock cooler won’t let you overclock it too much.
The bundled cooler isn’t that much great compared to its X-sibling, so there’s isn’t that much room for overclocking, although you can still overclock it with safety measures to squeeze out better frequencies. It also features a superb 65W TDP that ensures to keep the temperatures down, be more power-efficient and offer better performance.
The Ryzen 5 2600 features a DDR4-2933 RAM with 64GB size and maximum bandwidths up to 43.71GB/s, that too with ECC support. Its 3MB of L2 and a shared 16MB of L3 Cache size also ensure better performance by fetching data more quickly.
For a processor that offers excellent gaming and multitasking performance, consuming relatively less power and with a price tag under $200 is quite a bargain for me.
Ryzen 5 1600 Features
The Ryzen 5 1600 is another excellent processor released by AMD that features a higher-core count than Intel’s Kaby-Lake lineup and offers more value for money. The Ryzen 5 1600, which will cost you less than $200, features 6 multi-threaded cores, each core executing two threads at a time, making a total of 12 threads.
The higher number of cores and multi-threading support enables the Ryzen 1600 to handle serious workloads, whether gaming or multitasking. It is based on AMD’s Zen architecture built on a 14nm manufacturing process that pulls ahead of most of Intel’s Kaby-Lake lineup chipsets.
The Ryzen 5 1600 clocks up to 3.2GHz on the Base frequency and up to 3.6GHz on Turbo Boost frequency with unlocked multipliers, which means that you can overclock your processor for better frequencies.
It features the Wraith Spire bundled cooler with no LED lighting, which in our opinion, isn’t going to let you overclock the Ryzen 1600 that much. You’ll need to get your hands on a better aftermarket cooler to squeeze out more frequencies. This processor also comes with the DDR4-2666 RAM type with 64GB size and memory bandwidths up to 39.74GB/s.
This processor packs a 3MB of L2 and a shared 16MB of L3 cache size, which is quite decent than Intel’s Kaby-Lake’s Cache sizes. The larger Cache size helps the processor to execute actions more quickly and offers better performance. The bundled Wraith Spire cooler and a 65W TDP make sure to keep the temperatures down and consume comparatively less power.
The Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 5 2600?
The Ryzen 5 2600, which was released over a year later after the Ryzen 5 1600, therefore the Ryzen 2600 features better architecture, better RAM, higher-clocked frequencies, and overall superior performance.
It is, without a doubt, a better processor than the Ryzen 1600, offering an improved gaming and multitasking performance.
After running some of the latest games on both the processors, the results proved that the Ryzen 2600 offers way superior performance than the Ryzen 1600. The Ryzen 5 2600 leaves the 1600 behind in both single-core and multi-core performance.
But, the enhanced performance of the Ryzen 2600 does not make the 1600 a mediocre processor; both the processors feature the same number of cores with multi-threading support, and the Ryzen 1600 made sure to offer solid performance on both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads.
The only thing that gives an edge in performance to the Ryzen 2600 is its new, improved architecture, known as Zen+, which has allowed AMD to reduce its fabrication process and clock more frequencies with improved memory types. The only advantage of the Ryzen 1600 over the 2600 is its price tag; the 1600 is cheaper than the 2600, making it a better option for people with tight budgets.
Result
The result is crystal clear; the Ryzen 2600 is a superior processor when compare to the Ryzen 1600, offers way better performance on single-core and multi-threaded workloads. Thanks to its new and improved Zen+ architecture, the 2600 clocks higher frequencies, better manufacturing process, and enhanced memory types.
So if you’re a gaming fan or a serious multitasker, you should buy the Ryzen 2600 because it offers better performance than the Ryzen 1600. The Ryzen 2600 runs almost every game without any difficulty and can also handle heavy workloads with ease.
While the Ryzen 1600 also offers excellent performance, running the latest games and handling heavy workloads, but it struggles against the Ryzen 2600. So, the Ryzen 5 2600 is a much better choice.
However, if you’re on a tight budget or want to save some bucks for further aftermarket upgrades, you should buy the Ryzen 5 1600, as it also offers solid performance and more value for money.
Related:
Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD FX-8350
AMD Ryzen 7 3800x vs Intel i7 9700k
Nick Miller
It’s Nick Miller a 25 year old tech enthusiast and senior editor at Flexgate, i try to make tech simple for the everyday person.
You will find review about tech, tools and Computer hardware here.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF versus AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
versus
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2600
Advantages
Reasons to select AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2600
- The processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows you to easily make an overclocking
- about 8% more clock frequency: 3.9 GHZ VS 3.6 GHZ
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3343 | |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2263 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 13250 |
Performance comparison
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Zen+ | Zen |
| Production date | Q1’2020 | September 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YD1600BBAFBOX | YD260BBBM6IAF |
| Place in the ranking | 1575 | 745 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Desktop Processors | |
| Base frequency | 3. 2 GHz |
3.4 GHz |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB | 16MB |
| Process | 12 nm | 12nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 12 |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Crystal area | 192mm | |
| Level 1 cache | 576KB | |
| Level 2 cache | 3MB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | |
| Number of transistors | 4800 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 39. 74 GB/s |
|
| Maximum memory size | 64GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | |
| Supported sockets | AM4 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 20 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.
|