Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/ryzen-7-1700-vs-ryzen-5-2600%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/ryzen-7-1700-vs-ryzen-5-2600%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 — Doom vs RX 570
performance comparison
RX 570 with
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
doom
RX 570 with
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 7 1700
Multi-Thread Performance
13503 Pts
13749 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2008 Pts
1774 Pts
900 03 Doom
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 in Doom using RX 570 — CPU performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 7 1700
Ultra quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
91. |
| 1080p |
86.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
62.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
58.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
31.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
29.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
50.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
47.0 FPS |
High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
146.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
138.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
105.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
99. |
| 2160p |
58.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
55.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
87.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
82.9 FPS |
9 FPS Medium quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
201.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
191.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
148.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
141.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
85.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
81. |
| w1440p |
124.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
118.9 FPS |
5 FPS Low quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
310.6 FPS |
| 1080p |
297.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
234.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
224.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
140.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
133.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
199.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
190. |
7 FPS Ryzen 5 2600
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
- Ryzen 5 2600 The Ryzen 5 2600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
Ryzen 7 1700
- Ryzen 7 1700 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads.
Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications. - Ryzen 7 1700 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 Architecture
| Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 1700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Zen | Zen |
| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | YD2600BBM6IAF | YD1700BBAEBOX |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Apr 2018 | Mar 2017 |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 Cache
| Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 1700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 Cores
| Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 1700 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 Features
| Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 1700 | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.  1SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 Notes
| Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 1700 | |
|---|---|---|
| This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. | This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 Performance
| Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 1700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. 4 GHz |
3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 34.0x | 30.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| TDP | 65W | 65W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 3.9 GHz | up to 3.7 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 Physical
| Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 1700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | 192 mm² | 192 mm² |
| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Package | µOPGA-1331 | µPGA |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | 4800 million | 4800 million |
| tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share your comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Comparison of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s).
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
versus
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- 6 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 12 vs 6 90 354
- 12 more threads: 24 vs 12
- Approximately 67% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 22139 vs 13230
- Approximately 32% increase in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance: 7047 vs 5321
| Number of cores | 12 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 24 vs 12 |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 22139 vs 13230 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 7047 vs 5321 |
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- CPU unlocked, unlocked multiplier makes it easy to overclock
- About 26% more clock speed: 3.
9 GHz vs 3.10 GHz - Newer process technology to make the processor more powerful but with lower power consumption: 12 nm FinFET vs 22 nm
- Approximately 85% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 120 Watt
- about 34% more in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2248 vs 1680
- About 38% more in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 974 vs 705
9 0353 Approximately 12% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 84.5°C
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.10 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 84.5°C |
| Process | 12nm FinFET vs 22nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2248 vs 1680 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 974 vs 705 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
| Name | Intel Xeon E5-2670v3 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1680 | 2248 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 22139 | 13230 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 705 | 974 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 7047 | 5321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3476 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
46.475 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.922 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Xeon E5-2670v3 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Haswell | Zen+ |
| Production date | Q3’14 | April 19, 2018 |
| Ranking | 1182 | 1319 |
| Processor Number | E5-2670V3 | |
| Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors |
| Status | Launched | |
| Applicability | Server | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
| OPN PIB | YD2600BBAFBOX | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Price now | $159. 99 |
|
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 24.89 | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 9.6 GT/s QPI | |
| Process | 22 nm | 12nm FinFET |
| Maximum core temperature | 84.5°C | 95°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3. 9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 12 | 6 |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| Number of threads | 24 | 12 |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.65V–1.30V | |
| Crystal area | 213 mm | |
| Level 1 cache | 576KB | |
| Level 2 cache | 3MB | |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB | |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum number of memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 768GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933MHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Package Size | 52.
|