Ryzen 5 2600x vs i7 8700k: Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-8700K [14-Benchmark Showdown]

Intel Core i7 8700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X: performance comparison

Intel Core i7 8700K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

We compared two 6-core desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core i7 8700K against the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2600X. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i7 8700K

Ryzen 5 2600X

Multi-Core Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i7 8700K

Ryzen 5 2600X

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i7 8700K

Ryzen 5 2600X

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i7 8700K

Ryzen 5 2600X

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 2600X and 8700K

Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700K

Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
19% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1242 vs 1048 points
Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
12% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Has 4096 KB larger L3 cache size
More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
Newer — released 6-months later
Around 2.11 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+11%

1213

Ryzen 5 2600X

1096

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+18%

8915

Ryzen 5 2600X

7531

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+15%

2754

Ryzen 5 2600X

2405

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i7 8700K

13786

Ryzen 5 2600X
+2%

14049

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+18%

1247

Ryzen 5 2600X

1054

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 8700K
+14%

6650

Ryzen 5 2600X

5827

Submit your Cinebench R23 result

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 8700K and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

General

Vendor	Intel	AMD
Released	October 5, 2017	April 19, 2018
Type	Desktop	Desktop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Coffee Lake	—
Model number	i7-8700K	—
Integrated GPU	UHD Graphics 630	No

Performance Cores
P-Cores	6	6
P-Threads	12	12
Base Frequency (P)	3. 7 GHz	3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P)	4.7 GHz	4.2 GHz

Total
Total Cores	6	6
Total Threads	12	12
Bus Frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	37x	36x
Bus Bandwidth	8 GT/s	—
L1 Cache	64K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 Cache	12MB (shared)	16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	Yes	Yes

Package

Transistors	—	4. 8 billions
Fabrication process	14 nm	12 nm
TDP (PL1)	95 W	95 W
Socket	LGA-1151	AM4
Peak temperature	100°C	95°C

Integrated Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630	—
GPU Base Clock	350 MHz	—
GPU Boost Clock	1200 MHz	—
Shading Units	192	—
TMUs	24	—
ROPs	3	—
Execution Units	24	—
TGP	15 W	—
Max. Resolution	4096×2304 — 60 Hz	—

iGPU FLOPS

Core i7 8700K

0.38 TFLOPS

Ryzen 5 2600X

n/a

Memory Support

Memory types	— DDR4-2666	— DDR4-2933
Memory Size	128 GB	64 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	43.71 GB/s
ECC Support	No	Yes

Official site	Intel Core i7 8700K official page	AMD Ryzen 5 2600X official page
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	16	20
Extended instructions	SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2	—

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i7 8700K

9 (42.9%)

Ryzen 5 2600X

12 (57.1%)

Total votes: 21

Сompetitors

1.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D or Core i7 8700K

2.
Core i5 12600K or Core i7 8700K

3.
Core i5 12400F or Core i7 8700K

4.
Core i7 13700K or Core i7 8700K

Compare other CPUs (540+)

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X or Intel Core i7 8700K?

Name

Message

Promotion

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i7-8700K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Intel Core i7-8700K

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X on one side and the Intel Core i7-8700K on the other side.

The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	Intel Core i7-8700K
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Zen+	Coffee Lake
Core name	Pinnacle Ridge	Coffee Lake-S
Family	Ryzen 5 2000	Core i7-8000
Part number(s), S-Spec	YD260XBCM6IAF	BX80684I78700K, BXC80684I78700K, CM8068403358220, SR3QR, QNMK
Release date	Q2 2018	Q4 2017
Lithography	12 nm	14 nm++
Transistors	4. 800.000.000	3.000.000.000
Cores	6	6
Threads	12	12
Base frequency	3,6 GHz	3,7 GHz
Turbo frequency	4,2 GHz	4,7 GHz
High performance cores	—	6 Cores 12 Threads @ 3,7 / 4,7 GHz
Cache memory	16 MB	12 MB
Max memory capacity	64 GB	128 GB
Memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	43,71 GB/s	41,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	20	16
TDP	95 W	95 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)
GPU execution units	—	23
GPU shading units	—	184
GPU base clock	—	350 MHz
GPU boost clock	—	1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	—	423,2 GFLOPS
Socket	AM4, PGA-1331	LGA1151
Compatible motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard	Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	95°C	100°C
Crypto engine	—	AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security	—	Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard
Max display resolution	—	4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI), 4096 x 2304@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2304@60Hz (eDP)
CPU-Z single thread	475	475
CPU-Z multi thread	3. 776	3.693
Cinebench R15 single thread	179	194
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	1.403	1.402
Cinebench R23 single thread	1.091	1.216
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	7.895	8.985
PassMark single thread	2.398	2.775
PassMark CPU Mark	14.063	13.883
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core	4.670	6.100
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core	22. 045	24.045
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	316,8 GFLOPS	453,8 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	232 pts / W	253 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-8700K is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	475 3.776
Intel Core i7-8700K	475 3.693

In a single core, there is no noticeable difference. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	179 1.403
Intel Core i7-8700K	194 1.402

In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700K	1.216 8.985
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	1.091 7.895

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	2.398 14.063
Intel Core i7-8700K	2.775 13.883

In single core, the difference is -14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i7-8700K	6.100 24.045
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	4.670 22.045

In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i7-8700K	6.115 27.677
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	5. 213 25.900

In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i7-8700K	5.646 21.101
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	4.466 16.392

In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 29%.

On Mac OS X:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
Intel Core i7-8700K	6.084 28.485
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X	5.039 23.457

In single core, the difference is 21%.