Ryzen 5 2600x vs ryzen 3 3200g: AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs 5 2600X

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 3 3200G: performance comparison

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2600X with 6-cores against the 3.6 GHz Ryzen 3 3200G with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 5 2600X

49

Ryzen 3 3200G

43

Multi-Core Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 5 2600X

26

Ryzen 3 3200G

13

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 5 2600X

47

Ryzen 3 3200G

55

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 5 2600X

41

Ryzen 3 3200G

36

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 3200G and 2600X

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

  • Has 12288 KB larger L3 cache size
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 17% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1048 vs 897 points
  • 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 2 GHz vs 4 GHz)

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

  • Newer — released 1-year and 6-months later
  • Includes an integrated GPU Radeon Vega 8

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 2600X
+15%

1087

Ryzen 3 3200G

943

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 2600X
+127%

7517

Ryzen 3 3200G

3308

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 2600X
+7%

2370

Ryzen 3 3200G

2210

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 2600X
+95%

13981

Ryzen 3 3200G

7159

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 2600X
+18%

1048

Ryzen 3 3200G

889

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 2600X
+91%

5787

Ryzen 3 3200G

3033

Submit your Cinebench R23 result

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 3 3200G

General

Vendor AMD AMD
Released April 19, 2018 September 30, 2019
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen+ (Picasso)
Integrated GPU No Radeon Vega 8
Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 4
P-Threads 12 4
Base Frequency (P) 3. 6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.2 GHz 4 GHz
Total
Total Cores 6 4
Total Threads 12 4
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 36x
L1 Cache 96K (per core) 96K (per core)
L2 Cache 512K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 4MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Transistors 4. 8 billions 4.9 billions
Fabrication process 12 nm 12 nm
Socket AM4 AM4
TDP 95 W 45-65 W (configurable)
Peak temperature 95°C 95°C
Integrated Graphics Radeon Vega 8
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1250 MHz
Shading Units 512
TMUs 32
ROPs 8
Execution Units 8
TGP 65 W
Max. Resolution 3840×2160 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Ryzen 5 2600X

n/a

Ryzen 3 3200G

1.13 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-2933
Memory Size 64 GB 64 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No
Official site AMD Ryzen 5 2600X official page AMD Ryzen 3 3200G official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 8

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 5 2600X

9 (69. 2%)

Ryzen 3 3200G

4 (30.8%)

Total votes: 13

Сompetitors

1.
Ryzen 3 3200G or Ryzen 5 5500

2.
Ryzen 3 3200G or Ryzen 5 5600G

Compare other CPUs (540+)

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 3200G or Ryzen 5 2600X?

Name

Message

Promotion

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences








AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X on one side and the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen+

Zen+
Core name

Pinnacle Ridge

Picasso
Family

Ryzen 5 2000

Ryzen 3 3000
Part number(s), S-Spec

YD260XBCM6IAF

YD3200C5M4MFH,

YD3200C5FHBOX


Release date

Q2 2018

Q3 2019
Lithography

12 nm

12 nm
Transistors

4. 800.000.000

4.950.000.000
Cores

6

4
Threads

12

4
Base frequency

3,6 GHz

3,6 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,2 GHz

4,0 GHz
Cache memory

16 MB

4 MB
Max memory capacity

64 GB

64 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2933

DDR4-2933


Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

43,71 GB/s

43,71 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

20

12
TDP

95 W

65 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

None

AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso)
GPU cores

8
GPU shading units

512
GPU base clock

300 MHz
GPU boost clock

1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

1. 229 GFLOPS
Socket

AM4, PGA-1331

AM4
Compatible motherboard

Socket AM4 Motherboard 

Socket AM4 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

95°C

95°C
CPU-Z single thread

475

429
CPU-Z multi thread

3.776

1.666
Cinebench R23 single thread

1.091

982
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

7.895

3.909
PassMark single thread

2. 398

2.216
PassMark CPU Mark

14.063

7.204
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core

4.670

4.137
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

22.045

11.434
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

316,8 GFLOPS

184,4 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

232 pts / W

176 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is less. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

475

3.776
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

429

1.666

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 127%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

1. 091

7.895
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

982

3.909

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 102%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

2. 398

14.063
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

2.216

7.204

In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 95%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:




Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

4.670

22.045
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

4.137

11.

2024 © All rights reserved