Ryzen 5 3600 vs fx 6300: AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: What is the difference?

AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: What is the difference?

40points

AMD FX-6300

61points

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD FX-6300

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Why is AMD FX-6300 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?

  • 3MB bigger L2 cache?
    6MBvs3MB
  • 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    1MB/corevs0.5MB/core
  • Has FMA4?

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than AMD FX-6300?

  • 1334MHz higher ram speed?
    3200MHzvs1866MHz
  • 6 more CPU threads?
    12vs6
  • 24.5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    95°Cvs70.5°C
  • 25nm smaller semiconductor size?
    7nmvs32nm
  • 4.33x higher PassMark result?
    17860vs4125
  • 30W lower TDP?
    65Wvs95W
  • 24MB bigger L3 cache?
    32MBvs8MB
  • 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
    4vs3

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-6300

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

AMD FX-6300

vs

Intel Core i5-4570

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD FX-6300

vs

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD FX-6300

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD FX-6300

vs

AMD Phenom II X4 955

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

AMD FX-6300

vs

AMD A8-7600

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4500

AMD FX-6300

vs

AMD FX-8350

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

AMD FX-6300

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD FX-6300

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

Intel Core i3-12100

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD FX-6300

2 User reviews

AMD FX-6300

9. 5/10

2 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

5 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

9.0/10

5 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.0/10

2 votes

9.2/10

5 votes

Gaming

8.0/10

2 votes

8.8/10

4 votes

Performance

8.5/10

2 votes

9.0/10

5 votes

Reliability

8.5/10

2 votes

9.2/10

5 votes

Energy efficiency

7.5/10

2 votes

9.3/10

4 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.5GHz

6 x 3.6GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.1GHz

4.2GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-6300

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

1MB/core

0. 5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.33MB/core

5.33MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1866MHz

3200MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

47.68GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

5.4GT/s

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD FX-6300

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

235seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

705.9seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖AMD FX-6300

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD FX-6300

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD FX-6300

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD FX-6300

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD FX-6300

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-6300

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

FX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Availability

AMD FX-Series FX-6300 FX6300 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 pin FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX 3.5GHz 8MB 6 cores

Buy on Amazon

$104.04

In Stock

Updated 39 minutes ago

Availability

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler

Buy on Amazon

$138.44

In Stock

Updated 40 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.

Advantages of AMD FX-6300

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  • Performs up to 34% better in VALORANT than FX-6300 — 468 vs 349 FPS

  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 — 65 vs 95 Watts

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 — 12 vs 6 threads

VALORANT

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

349

75%

Value, $/FPS

$0.3/FPS

100%

Price, $

$104.04

100%

AMD FX-Series FX-6300 FX6300 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 pin FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX 3.5GHz 8MB 6 cores

Buy for $104.04 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 39 minutes ago

Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


FPS

468

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0. 3/FPS

100%

Price, $

$138.44

75%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler

Buy for $138.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 40 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019

814

FPS

1072

FPS

League of Legends

349

FPS

468

FPS

VALORANT

199

FPS

268

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

214

FPS

294

FPS

Apex Legends

216

FPS

289

FPS

Fortnite

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

518

43%

Multi-Core

1905

29%

Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


Single-Core

1206

100%

Multi-Core

6669

100%

AMD FX-6300

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Oct 23rd, 2012 Release Date

Jul 7th, 2019

FX Collection Ryzen 5
Vishera Codename Matisse
AMD Socket AM3+ Socket AMD Socket AM4

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

6 Cores 6
6 Threads

12

3. 5 GHz Base Clock Speed

3.6 GHz

4.1 GHz Turbo Clock Speed

4.2 GHz

95 W TDP

65 W

32 nm Process Size

7 nm

17.5x Multiplier

36.0x

None Integrated Graphics None
Yes Overclockable Yes

Builds Using FX-6300 or Ryzen 5 3600

VALORANT, 1080p, High

Gaming PC

246 FPS

$0.41/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$99.99

In Stock

Updated 65875 minutes ago

iBUYPOWER Gaming PC

213 FPS

$2.82/FPS

Radeon RX 5500 XT

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, 240 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$599.99

In Stock

Updated 33 minutes ago

Skytech Blaze 3. 0 Black Gaming PC

333 FPS

$3.3/FPS

Radeon RX 6600 XT

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,099.99

In Stock

Updated 31 minutes ago

Centaurus Andromeda A8 Gaming Computer PC

311 FPS

$3.4/FPS

Radeon RX 6600

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,058

In Stock

Updated 30 minutes ago

Skytech Azure Gaming PC

378 FPS

$3.44/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$1,299.99

In Stock

Updated 33 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Mini Gaming PC

257 FPS

$3.5/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899.99

In Stock

Updated 33 minutes ago

SkyTech Archangel 3.0 Gaming Computer PC

257 FPS

$3.5/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899. 99

In Stock

Updated 32 minutes ago

SkyTech Archangel Gaming Computer PC

246 FPS

$3.86/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$949.99

In Stock

Updated 25 minutes ago

SkyTech Shadow 3.0 Gaming Computer PC

257 FPS

$3.89/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$999.99

In Stock

Updated 32 minutes ago

SkyTech Archangel 3.0 Gaming Computer PC

257 FPS

$3.89/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$999.99

In Stock

Updated 32 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i5-10400F

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

Ryzen 5 3600

$138. 44

Ryzen 7 5700G

$223.87

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

Ryzen 3 1300X

$157.96

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

Core i3-390M

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

Phenom X4 9850

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

Core 2 Duo T5900

N/A Stock

Core i9-10980XE

$999.01

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

EPYC 7702P

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.44

Pentium 4 550/551

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300

Availability

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Processor (6C/12T, 35 MB Cache, 4.2 GHz Max Boost)

Buy on Amazon

£192

In Stock

Updated 40 minutes ago

Availability

AMD FX-Series FX-6300 FX6300 DeskTop CPU Socket AM3 938 pin FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX 3.5GHz 8MB 6 cores

Buy on Amazon

£178.03

In Stock

Updated 39 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  • Performs up to 34% better in VALORANT than FX-6300 — 468 vs 349 FPS

  • Up to 20% better value when playing VALORANT than FX-6300 — £0.41 vs £0.51 per FPS

  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 — 65 vs 95 Watts

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 — 12 vs 6 threads

Advantages of AMD FX-6300

VALORANT

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


FPS

468

100%

Value, £/FPS

£0.41/FPS

100%

Price, £

£192

92%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Processor (6C/12T, 35 MB Cache, 4.2 GHz Max Boost)

Buy for £192 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 40 minutes ago

FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

349

66%

Value, £/FPS

£0. 51/FPS

80%

Price, £

£178.03

100%

AMD FX-Series FX-6300 FX6300 DeskTop CPU Socket AM3 938 pin FD6300WMW6KHK FD6300WMHKBOX 3.5GHz 8MB 6 cores

Buy for £178.03 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 39 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019

FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

1072

FPS

814

FPS

League of Legends

468

FPS

349

FPS

VALORANT

268

FPS

199

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

294

FPS

214

FPS

Apex Legends

289

FPS

216

FPS

Fortnite

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Ryzen 5 3600

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


Single-Core

1206

100%

Multi-Core

6669

100%

FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

518

-33%

Multi-Core

1905

-150%

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

vs

AMD FX-6300

Jul 7th, 2019

Release Date Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 Collection FX
Matisse Codename Vishera
AMD Socket AM4 Socket AMD Socket AM3+

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

6 Cores 6

12

Threads 6

3. 6 GHz

Base Clock Speed 3.5 GHz

4.2 GHz

Turbo Clock Speed 4.1 GHz

65 W

TDP 95 W

7 nm

Process Size 32 nm

36.0x

Multiplier 17.5x
None Integrated Graphics None
Yes Overclockable Yes

Builds Using Ryzen 5 3600 or FX-6300

VALORANT, 1080p, High

PALICOMP Gaming PC

257 FPS

£2.88/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

£739.99

In Stock

Updated 37 minutes ago

PALICOMP Gaming PC

174 FPS

£3.1/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

£539.99

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Regiment Gaming PC

246 FPS

£3. 13/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600

8 GB, 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£770.4

In Stock

Updated 37 minutes ago

PALICOMP Gaming PC

257 FPS

£3.27/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

£839.99

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

PALICOMP Gaming PC

174 FPS

£3.51/FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

£609.99

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

ADMI Gaming PC

235 FPS

£3.62/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Ryzen 5 3600

12 GB, 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£849.95

In Stock

Updated 37 minutes ago

G6 Gaming PC

336 FPS

£3.65/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 3 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£1,226. 98

In Stock

Updated 33 minutes ago

Fierce RGB Gaming PC

246 FPS

£3.78/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600

12 GB, 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£929.9

In Stock

Updated 33 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Wyvern Gaming PC

235 FPS

£3.8/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£894

In Stock

Updated 37 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Wyvern Gaming PC

235 FPS

£3.91/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

£918

In Stock

Updated 37 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i5-10400F

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 7 5700G

£229. 99

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 3 1300X

£141.17

Ryzen 5 3600

Core i3-390M

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 3600

Phenom X4 9850

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 3600

Core 2 Duo T5900

N/A Stock

Core i9-10980XE

£931.19

Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 3600

EPYC 7702P

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 3600

Pentium 4 550/551

N/A Stock

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD FX-6300

Summary

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    295%

  • AMD FX-6300

    100%

Relative performance

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    212%

  • AMD FX-6300

    100%

Relative performance

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    377%

  • AMD FX-6300

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Much higher single threaded performance (around 112% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 277% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Around 195% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider AMD FX-6300
None

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.


Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD FX-6300
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
SSE4a
CLMUL
CVT16
FMA4
XOP
Turbo Core
HT3.1

Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD FX-6300
Architecture AMD Zen 2 vs AMD Piledriver
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR3
Codename Zen 2 vs Vishera
Release Date Mar 2019 vs Oct 2012

Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD FX-6300
Cores 6 vs 6
Threads 12 vs 6
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics No vs No

Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD FX-6300
L1 Cache 96K (per core) vs 288 KB
L2 Cache 512K (per core) vs 6144 KB
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) vs 8192 KB (shared)

Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD FX-6300
Socket AMD Socket AM4 vs AMD Socket AM3+
Max Case Temp unknown vs unknown
Package vs uPGA
Die Size unknown vs 315mm²
Process 7 nm vs 32 nm

Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD FX-6300
Cpu Frequency 3600 MHz vs 3500 MHz
Turbo Clock 4400 MHz vs 4100 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 200 MHz
Voltage variable vs 1. 4 V
TDP 65 W vs 95 W
  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    4928 points

  • AMD FX-6300

    2501 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    29514 points

  • AMD FX-6300

    10504 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (simulated)

    206.31

  • AMD FX-6300 (simulated)

    97.26

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel Core i7-11800H
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel Core i7-11700F
VS
AMD FX-6300 AMD Athlon Silver 3050GE
VS
AMD FX-6300 AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
VS
Intel Core i5-12600K Intel Core i5-12600KF
VS
Intel Core i5-12600KF AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Just Cause 4

GTX 1660 with

AMD FX-6300 Six-Core


Ryzen 5 3600
FX-6300 Six-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

19634 Pts

6385 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2900 Pts

1407 Pts

Just Cause 4

Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 3600
FX-6300 Six-Core


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

66.5 FPS

1080p

33.2 FPS

1440p

49.2 FPS

1440p

24.5 FPS

2160p

25. 6 FPS

2160p

12.8 FPS

w1440p

40.0 FPS

w1440p

19.9 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

111.6 FPS

1080p

61.5 FPS

1440p

86.2 FPS

1440p

47.2 FPS

2160p

49.1 FPS

2160p

26.7 FPS

w1440p

72.2 FPS

w1440p

39.4 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

156.6 FPS

1080p

89.7 FPS

1440p

123.3 FPS

1440p

69. 9 FPS

2160p

72.5 FPS

2160p

40.7 FPS

w1440p

104.4 FPS

w1440p

58.9 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

246.8 FPS

1080p

146.3 FPS

1440p

197.4 FPS

1440p

115.4 FPS

2160p

119.4 FPS

2160p

68.6 FPS

w1440p

168.8 FPS

w1440p

97.8 FPS

Ryzen 5 3600
    FX-6300 Six-Core

      Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core specifications

      Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Architecture
      Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
      Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Cache
      Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
      Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Cores
      Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
      Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Performance
      Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
      Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Physical
      Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core

      Share Your Comments 0

      Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core in more games

      Elden Ring

      2022

      God of War

      2022

      Overwatch 2

      2022

      Forza Horizon 5

      2021

      Halo Infinite

      2021

      Battlefield 2042

      2021

      Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

      2020

      Microsoft Flight Simulator

      2020

      Valorant

      2020

      Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

      2020

      Death Stranding

      2020

      Marvel’s Avengers

      2020

      Godfall

      2020

      Cyberpunk 2077

      2020

      Apex Legends

      2019

      Anthem

      2019

      Far Cry New Dawn

      2019

      Resident Evil 2

      2019

      Metro Exodus

      2019

      World War Z

      2019

      Gears of War 5

      2019

      F1 2019

      2019

      GreedFall

      2019

      Borderlands 3

      2019

      Call of Duty Modern Warfare

      2019

      Red Dead Redemption 2

      2019

      Need For Speed: Heat

      2019

      Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

      2018

      Battlefield V

      2018

      Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

      2018

      Final Fantasy XV

      2018

      Shadow of the Tomb Raider

      2018

      Forza Horizon 4

      2018

      Fallout 76

      2018

      Hitman 2

      2018

      Just Cause 4

      2018

      Monster Hunter: World

      2018

      Strange Brigade

      2018

      Assassin’s Creed Origins

      2017

      Dawn of War III

      2017

      Ghost Recon Wildlands

      2017

      Destiny 2

      2017

      PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

      2017

      Fortnite Battle Royale

      2017

      Need For Speed: Payback

      2017

      For Honor

      2017

      Project CARS 2

      2017

      Forza Motorsport 7

      2017

      Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

      2016

      Battlefield 1

      2016

      Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

      2016

      Doom

      2016

      F1 2016

      2016

      Total War: Warhammer

      2016

      Overwatch

      2016

      Dishonored 2

      2016

      Grand Theft Auto V

      2015

      Rocket League

      2015

      Need For Speed

      2015

      Project CARS

      2015

      Rainbow Six Siege

      2015

      Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

      2012

      League of Legends

      2009

      Minecraft

      2009

      AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600








      AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-6300 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

      Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

      This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

      Specifications:

      Processor

      AMD FX-6300

      AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      Market (main)

      Desktop

      Desktop
      ISA

      x86-64 (64 bit)

      x86-64 (64 bit)
      Microarchitecture

      Piledriver

      Zen 2
      Core name

      Vishera

      Matisse
      Family

      FX-6000

      Ryzen 5 3000
      Part number(s), S-Spec

      FD6300WMW6KHK,

      FD6300WMHKBOX

      100-000000031,

      100-000000031BOX

      Release date

      Q4 2012

      Q3 2019
      Lithography

      32 nm SOI

      7 nm FinFET
      Transistors

      1. 200.000.000

      4.800.000.000
      Cores

      6

      6
      Threads

      6

      12
      Base frequency

      3,5 GHz

      3,6 GHz
      Turbo frequency

      3,8 GHz

      4,2 GHz
      Cache memory

      8 MB

      32 MB
      Max memory capacity

      32 GB

      128 GB
      Memory types

      DDR3-1866

      DDR4-3200
      Max # of memory channels

      2

      2
      Max memory bandwidth

      29,9 GB/s

      47,68 GB/s
      Max PCIe lanes

      16

      20
      TDP

      95 W

      65 W
      Suggested PSU

      600W ATX Power Supply

      600W ATX Power Supply
      GPU integrated graphics

      None

      None
      Socket

      AM3+

      AM4
      Compatible motherboard

      Socket AM3+ Motherboard 

      Socket AM4 Motherboard 
      Maximum temperature

      70. 5°C

      95°C
      CPU-Z single thread

      223

      509
      CPU-Z multi thread

      1.022

      4.039
      Cinebench R15 single thread

      95

      195
      Cinebench R15 multi-thread

      412

      1.564
      Cinebench R23 single thread

      495

      1.215
      Cinebench R23 multi-thread

      2.549

      9.109
      PassMark single thread

      1.471

      2.570
      PassMark CPU Mark

      4. 124

      17.842
      (Windows 64-bit)
      Geekbench 4 single core

      2.518

      5.470
      (Windows 64-bit)
      Geekbench 4 multi-core

      8.133

      27.530
      (SGEMM)
      GFLOPS performance

      67,2 GFLOPS

      484 GFLOPS
      (Multi-core / watt performance)
      Performance / watt ratio

      86 pts / W

      424 pts / W
      Amazon


      eBay


      Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

      We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

      Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

      Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

      We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was started more recently.

      Performances :

      Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





      CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      509

      4. 039
      AMD FX-6300

      223

      1.022

      In single core, the difference is 128%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 295%.

      Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
      average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

      CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





      Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      195

      1.564
      AMD FX-6300

      95

      412

      In single core, the difference is 105%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 280%.

      Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
      average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

      Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





      Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      1.215

      9.109
      AMD FX-6300

      495

      2.549

      In single core, the difference is 145%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 257%.

      Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
      average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

      Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





      PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      2.570

      17.842
      AMD FX-6300

      1.471

      4. 124

      In single core, the difference is 75%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 333%.

      Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
      average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

      PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

      On Windows 64-bit:





      Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      5.470

      27.530
      AMD FX-6300

      2.518

      8.133

      In single core, the difference is 117%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 238%.

      On Linux 64-bit:





      Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      5.782

      30.309
      AMD FX-6300

      2.676

      8.944

      In single core, the difference is 116%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 239%.

      On Android 64-bit:





      Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      5.610

      27.268
      AMD FX-6300

      2.217

      6.862

      In single core, the difference is 153%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 297%.

      On Mac OS X 64-bit:





      Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      5.540

      28.445
      AMD FX-6300

      2.266

      8.231

      In single core, the difference is 144%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 246%.

      Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
      average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

      Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

      Equivalence:

      AMD FX-6300 Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel equivalent

      See also:

      AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

      AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600: What is the difference?

      Smartphone-graphic wire headphones

      40 Ballla

      AMD FX-6300

      61 BALLLA

      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      VS

      64 AMD FX-6300

      AMD Ryzen 5 36300 9000 AMD Ryzen 5 36300 9000 AMD RYZEN Is 6300 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3600?

      • 3MB more L2 cache?
        6MB vs 3MB
      • 0.5MB/core more L2 cache per core?
        1MB/core vs 0.5MB/core
      • Has FMA4?

      Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than AMD FX-6300?

      • 1334MHz higher RAM speed?
        3200MHz vs 1866MHz
      • 6 more CPU threads?
        12 vs 6
      • 24. 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
        95°C vs 70.5°C
      • Semiconductor size 25nm smaller?
        7nm vs 32nm
      • 4.33x higher PassMark score?
        17860 vs 4125
      • 30W below TDP?
        65W vs 95W
      • 24MB more L3 cache?
        32MB vs 8MB
      • 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
        4 vs 3

      Which comparisons are the most popular?

      AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

      vs

      Intel Core i5-1135G7

      AMD RYZEN 3 3250U

      VS

      Intel Core i3-1115G4

      AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

      VS

      Intel Core i3-1115g4

      AMD Ryzen 5 3500u

      VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS AMD RYZEN 7 3700U

      VS

      Intel Core i5-10210U

      AMD Ryzen 7 5800h

      VS

      Intel Core i7-11800H

      AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

      9000 2 VS

      Intel Core INTEL COREN 5 4600H

      VS

      Intel Core i5-10300h

      Intel Core i3-1115G4

      VS

      Intel Core i5-1135G7

      AMD Ryzen 5 5500u 9000 VS

      9000 9000

      SOMOS

      users reviews

      total rating

      AMD FX-6300

      2 reviews of users

      AMD FX-6300

      /10

      2 reviews0003

      5 reviews of users

      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      /10

      5 Reviews of users

      Functions

      /10

      2 VOTES

      5 Votes

      Games

      8. 0 /10

      2 Votes

      8.8 /10

      4 Votes

      performance

      8.5 /10 9 9

      2 Votes

      /10

      5 Votes

      Reliability

      8.5 /10

      2 Votes

      9.2 /10

      7

      2 Votes

      9.3 /10

      4 Votes

      Productivity

      1. Skur -old processor

      6 x 3.5GHZ

      6 x 3.6GHZ

      The speed of the central processor shows how many processing cycles per second can be performed processor, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

      2nd processor thread

      More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

      3.speed turbo clock

      4.1GHz

      4.2GHz

      When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

      4. Has unlocked multiplier

      ✔AMD FX-6300

      ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

      5.L2 cache

      More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      6.L3 cache

      More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      7.L1 cache

      More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

      8.core L2

      1MB/core

      0.5MB/core

      More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

      9.core L3

      1.33MB/core

      5.33MB/core

      More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

      Memory

      1.RAM speed

      1866MHz

      3200MHz

      Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

      2.max memory bandwidth

      21GB/s

      47.68GB/s

      This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

      3rd version of DDR memory

      DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

      4.Memory channels

      More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

      5.max memory

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Maximum amount of memory (RAM).

      6.bus baud rate

      5.4GT/s

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

      The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

      7. Supports memory debug code

      ✖AMD FX-6300

      ✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

      8.eMMC version

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

      A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

      9.bus frequency

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

      The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

      Geotagging

      1. PassMark result

      This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.

      2. PassMark result (single)

      This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

      3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

      4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

      5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

      6. Geekbench 5 result (single core)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

      7. Blender test result (bmw27)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      235seconds

      The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

      8.Blender result (classroom)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      705.9seconds

      The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

      9.performance per watt

      This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

      Features

      1. uses multi-threading

      ✖AMD FX-6300

      ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

      2. Has AES

      ✔AMD FX-6300

      ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

      3. Has AVX

      ✔AMD FX-6300

      ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

      4.Version SSE

      SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

      5. Has F16C

      ✔AMD FX-6300

      ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

      6.bits transmitted at the same time

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

      NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

      7. Has MMX

      ✔AMD FX-6300

      ✔AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

      8. TrustZone enabled

      ✖AMD FX-6300

      ✖AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming .

      9.interface width

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)

      Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3600)

      The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

      Price comparison

      Cancel

      Which CPUs are better?

      This page is currently only available in English.

      Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core — Just Cause 4 vs GTX 1660 performance comparison

      GTX 1660 with

      AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      Just Cause 4

      GTX 1660 with

      AMD FX-6300 Six-Core


      Ryzen 5 3600
      FX-6300 Six-Core

      Multi-Thread Performance

      19634 Pts

      6385 Pts

      Single-Thread Performance

      2900 Pts

      1407 Pts

      Just Cause 4

      Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six- Core in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

      Ryzen 5 3600
      FX-6300 Six-Core


      Ultra Quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      66.5 FPS

      1080p

      33.2 FPS

      1440p

      49. 2 FPS

      1440p

      24.5 FPS

      2160p

      25.6 FPS

      2160p

      12.8 FPS

      w1440p

      40.0 FPS

      w1440p

      19.9 FPS

      High quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      111.6 FPS

      1080p

      61.5 FPS

      1440p

      86.2 FPS

      1440p

      47.2 FPS

      2160p

      49.1 FPS

      2160p

      26.7 FPS

      w1440p

      72.2 FPS

      w1440p

      39.4 FPS

      Medium quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      156. 6 FPS

      1080p

      89.7 FPS

      1440p

      123.3 FPS

      1440p

      69.9 FPS

      2160p

      72.5 FPS

      2160p

      40.7 FPS

      w1440p

      104.4 FPS

      w1440p

      58.9 FPS

      Low quality
      Resolution Frames per second
      1080p

      246.8 FPS

      1080p

      146.3 FPS

      1440p

      197.4 FPS

      1440p

      115.4 FPS

      2160p

      119.4 FPS

      2160p

      68.6 FPS

      w1440p

      168. 8 FPS

      w1440p

      97.8 FPS

      Ryzen 5 3600
        FX-6300 Six-Core

          Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core specifications

          Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Architecture
          Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
          Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Cache
          Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
          Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Cores
          Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
          Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Performance
          Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core
          Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Physical
          Ryzen 5 3600 FX-6300 Six-Core

          Share your comments 0

          Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs FX-6300 Six-Core in more games

          Elden Ring

          2022

          God of War

          2022

          Overwatch 2

          2022

          Forza Horizon 5

          2021

          Halo Infinite

          2021

          Battlefield 2042

          2021

          Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

          2020

          Microsoft Flight Simulator

          2020

          Valorant

          2020

          Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

          2020

          Death Stranding

          2020

          Marvel’s Avengers

          2020

          Godfall

          2020

          Cyberpunk 2077

          2020

          Apex Legends

          2019

          Anthem

          2019

          Far Cry New Dawn

          2019

          Resident Evil 2

          2019

          Metro Exodus

          2019

          World War Z

          2019

          Gears of War 5

          2019

          F1 2019

          2019

          GreedFall

          2019

          Borderlands 3

          2019

          Call of Duty Modern Warfare

          2019

          Red Dead Redemption 2

          2019

          Need For Speed: Heat

          2019

          Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

          2018

          Battlefield V

          2018

          Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

          2018

          Final Fantasy XV

          2018

          Shadow of the Tomb Raider

          2018

          Forza Horizon 4

          2018

          Fallout 76

          2018

          Hitman 2

          2018

          Just Cause 4

          2018

          Monster Hunter: World

          2018

          Strange Brigade

          2018

          Assassin’s Creed Origins

          2017

          Dawn of War III

          2017

          Ghost Recon Wildlands

          2017

          Destiny 2

          2017

          PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

          2017

          Fortnite Battle Royale

          2017

          Need For Speed: Payback

          2017

          For Honor

          2017

          Project CARS 2

          2017

          Forza Motorsport 7

          2017

          Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

          2016

          Battlefield 1

          2016

          Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

          2016

          Doom

          2016

          F1 2016

          2016

          Total War: Warhammer

          2016

          Overwatch

          2016

          Dishonored 2

          2016

          Grand Theft Auto V

          2015

          Rocket League

          2015

          Need For Speed ​​

          2015

          Project CARS

          2015

          Rainbow Six Siege

          2015

          Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

          2012

          League of Legends

          2009

          Minecraft

          2009

          AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs.

          AMD FX-6300

          AMD Ryzen 5 3600

          AMD Ryzen 5 3600 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to AM4 CPU socket This version includes 32.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, the Matisse (Zen 2) architecture has been improved in 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q3/2019

          AMD FX-6300

          AMD FX-6300 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.10 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 95 W .The CPU connects to the socket CPU AM3+ This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen . Tjunction stays below 71°C degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) architecture is advanced over 32 nm and supports AMD-V. The product was launched Q4/2012

          AMD Ryzen 5 3600

          AMD FX-6300

          Compare details

          Frequency 3. 50 GHz
          6 Cores 6
          4.20GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.10 GHz
          4.00 GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.10 GHz
          Yes Hyper Threading No.
          Yes Overclocking Yes
          normal Basic architecture normal
          no iGPU GPU no iGPU
          no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
          7 nm Technology 32nm
          no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
          DirectX Version
          Max. displays
          DDR4-3200 memory size
          2 Memory channels 2
          Maximum memory
          Yes ECC No.
          L2 Cache
          32.00 MB L3 Cache 8.00 MB
          4.0 PCIe version 3.0
          20 PCIe lanes
          7 nm Technology 32nm
          AM4 Connector AM3+
          65 W TDP 95W
          AMD-V, SVM Virtualization AMD-V
          Q3/2019 Release date Q4/2012

          Show more details

          Show more details

          Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

          Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

          Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

          Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

          Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

          Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

          Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

          Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

          Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

          Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

          Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

          Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

          Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

          Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

          Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

          Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

          Blender 2.

          81 (bmw27)

          Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

          Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

          Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

          Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

          Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

          Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

          Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

          Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

          Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.

          Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

          Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values ​​of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

          Monero Hashrate kH/s

          Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019of the year. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only be computed efficiently using a processor (CPU) or graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a large number of CPU cores, cache, and fast memory connectivity through as many memory channels as possible.

          Energy usage estimate

          Average hours of use per day

          Average CPU usage (0-100%)

          Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

          Energy usage estimate

          Average hours of use per day

          Average CPU usage (0-100%)

          Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

          AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD FX-6300
          65 W Max TDP 95W
          NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
          NA Operating cost per day NA
          NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
          NA Operating cost per year NA

          Popular comparison0001 Computer for Call of Duty: Warzone — system requirements and testing

          Release date : March 10, 2020
          Genre : Shooter, battle royale
          Developer : Infinity Act and Raven9 Software
          Publisher 3 March Publisher In 2020, Activision released a battle royale mode called Call of Duty: Warzone. The free-to-play game was highly acclaimed by players, attracting 6 million gamers in its first 24 hours, as well as being #1 in viewership on Twitch.

          System requirements Call of Duty: Warzone

          Minimum system requirements:
          • Processor: Intel Core i3-4340 or AMD FX-6300
          • Video card: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 670 / NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1650 / AMD Radeon HD 7950
          • RAM: 8 GB
          • Disk space: 175 GB
          • DirectX: 12
          • Operating system: Windows 7/10 64-bit
          Recommended system requirements (60 fps, medium):
          • Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-2500K / AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
          • Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 970 / NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1660 6GB / AMD Radeon R9 390 / AMD RX 580
          • RAM: 12 GB
          • Disk space: 175 GB
          • DirectX: 12
          • Operating system: Windows 10 64-bit
          AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
        • Video Card: NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 2060
        • RAM: 16 GB
        • Storage Space: 175 GB
        • DirectX: 12
        • Operating System: Windows 10 64-bit with competitive monitor high refresh rate)
          • Processor: Intel® Core™ i7-8700K / AMD Ryzen 1800X
          • Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1080 / NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 2070 SUPER / Radeon RX Vega 64
          • RAM: 16 GB
          • Disk Space: 175 GB
          • DirectX: 12
          • Operating System: Windows 10 64-bit
          4K Ray Traced Game Requirements
          • Processor: Intel® KK0Zen™ i7-970 AMD
          • Video Card: NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 2080 SUPER
          • RAM: 16 GB
          • Disk Space: 175 GB
          • DirectX: 11
          • Operating System: Windows 10 64-bit for Call of Duty 9 9 Warzone
            Video card for Call of Duty: Warzone

            Here are the results of testing Call of Duty: Warzone with NVIDIA video cards: FPS and video memory consumption:

            FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone

            Resolution 1920×1080, maximum graphics settings

            minimum FPS

            Medium FPS

            GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB

            124

            178

            GeForce RTX PER 9 80 26

            111

            151

            GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8 ГБ

            107

            141

            GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11 ГБ

            70

            129

            GeForce RTX 2060 Super 8 GB

            93

            119 9000 9000 9000

            GEFORCE RTX 2060 6 GB

            86

            108

            GEFORCE 8 GB0569

            63

            104

            GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6 ГБ

            74

            93

            GeForce GTX 1070 8 ГБ

            56

            83

            GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB

            57

            73

            GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9000 44

            61

            0570 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8 ГБ

            80

            100

            GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11 ГБ

            56

            92

            GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8 ГБ

            67

            84

            GeForce RTX 2060 6 ГБ

            59

            73

            GeForce GTX 1080 8 ГБ

            50

            72

            GeForce GTX 1070 8 GB

            42

            58

            For Call of Duty: Warzone at 2560×1440 (2K) at ultra GB TX108 settings, a GeForce0 GTX 2 or better graphics card is required. 208 The GeForce RTX 2060 6 GB graphics card will average 73 frames per second.

            Resolution 3840×2160, maximum graphics settings

            minimum FPS

            average FPS

            GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11 GB

            71

            92

            GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8 ГБ

            62

            76

            GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8 ГБ

            57

            70

            GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB

            44

            65

            GeForce RTX 2060 Super 8 GB

            48

            58

            GEFORCE GTX 10Call of Duty: Warzone at 3840×2160 (4K) ultra settings requires GeForce RTX 2070 Super 8 GB (70 FPS).

            Processor for Call of Duty: Warzone

            Processor testing

            Average and minimum FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone on various processors with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti video card NVIDIA:

            Resolution 1920×1080, maximum graphics settings

            140

            Intel Core i7-7700K

            75

            128

            AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

            72

            118

            AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

            64

            113

            Intel Core i3-8100

            50

            77

            To play the Full HD permission. with GeForce GTX 1650 Super 4 GB. The more powerful the graphics card, the more powerful the processor must be in order for the combination to work together to its full potential.

            Call of Duty: Warzone Gaming PCs

            Call of Duty: Warzone requires an entry-level gaming PC or higher. The optimal build for getting 60 FPS at maximum settings in FHD resolution is as follows:

            • GeForce GTX 1650 Super 4 GB graphics card;
            • Intel Core i3-10100 / AMD Ryzen 5 3500 processor;
            • 16 GB DDR4 RAM;

            We hope this guide will help you understand what kind of computer you need for Call of Duty: Warzone, or what to look for when buying a built computer. We also invite you to check out our Delta Game PCs, which are perfect for Call of Duty: Warzone.

            SSD drive

            240 GB SSD

            Hard disc

            1000 GB HDD

            power supply

            600W, 80 Plus Bronze

          2283 79 900 ₽ CHAL

        • Gaming computer on GeForce RTX 3060

          PHOENIX

          0003

          Intel Core i5-12400F 2500 MHz

          RAM

          16 GB DDR4 3600 MHz

          Maternal board

          Intel B660

          SSD drive

          250 GB SSD

          000 9000 9000 GB 9000 HDD

          power supply

          700W, 80 PLUS Bronze

        102 300 ₽

      • Game computer on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

        Orion

        from 85 500 ₽ Read more

          Video Card

          GEFORCE RTX 3060 Ti

          processor

          Intel Core I5-12400F 25000 MHC

          16 3600MHz

          motherboard

          Intel B660

          SSD

          250GB SSD

          HDD

          HDD 100003

          Power supply

          700W, 80 Plus Bronze

        104 800 ₽ For the recommended set of

        Change the configuration

      • $ 3070

        ° C.

          graphics card

          GeForce RTX 3070

          processor

          Intel Core i5-12600KF 3700MHz

          RAM

          16GB DDR4 3200MHz

          Maternal fee

          Intel Z690

          SSD Driver

          500 GB SSD

          Hard disc

          9000,1000 GB HDD

          9000 9000 9000 9000 700W, 80 PLUS Bronze Bronze Bronze Bronze 500 ₽ for the recommended package

          Reconfigure

        • GeForce RTX 3070 Ti gaming PC

          ATLAS

          from 114 500 ₽ Learn more

            graphics card

            GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

            Processor

            Intel Core i5-12600KF 3700 MHz

            16 GB DDR4 3200 MHz RGB

            9000 9000 9000

            Intel zpo

            500 GB SSD

            hard drive

            1000 GB HDD

            power supply

            750W, 80 PLUS Gold

            00 00 00 For the recommended equipment

            Change configuration

          • Game computer on the GeForce RTX 3080

            Amarok

            dated 128 800 ₽ Read more

            GEFORCE RTX 3080

            processor.

            RAM

            16GB DDR5 5200 MHz

            Motherboard

            Intel Z690

            SSD Drive

            500 GB SSD

            Hard disc

            1000 GB HDD

            Power Block

            850W, 80 Plus Gold

          193 300 ₽ 9000 for GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

          KRATOS

          0003

          RAM

          32 GB DDR5 5200 MHz

          Maternal Code

          Intel Z690

          SSD drive

          1000 GB SSD

          1000 GB HDD

          9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 850W, 80 PLUS Gold

        240 500 ₽ for the recommended package

        Reconfigure

      • GeForce RTX 309 gaming PC0

        HELIOS

        dated 189 400 ₽ Read more

          Video card

          GEFORCE RTX 3090

          processor

          Intel Core i7-12700KF 3600 MHz

          9000 32 MHz MATHTA MATT Intel Z690

          SSD drive

          1000 GB SSD

          Hard disc

          2000 GB HDD

          Power Block

          1000W, 80 Plus Platinum

          SSD drive

          500 GB SSD

          Hard disc

          without HDD

          Power Block

          9000 550W, 80 Plus Standart

        9000 500 ₽ 9000.

      • Gaming computer on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

        KRAKEN

        0003

        processor

        Intel Core i3-12100 3300 MHz

        RAM

        16 GB DDR4 3200 MHz

        Maternal

        Intel B660

        9000

        1000 GB HDD

        power supply

        550W, 80 PLUS Standart

      82 000 ₽ Change for the recommended configuration

    • RAM

      8 GB, DDR4

    • SSD drive

      512 GB SSD

    • Display

      15.6 «1920×1080 144 Hz 9000

    • 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

      MSI Katana GF66 11UD-1051X

      • Processor

        Intel Core i5-11400H 2700MHz

      • Graphics Card

        GeForce® RTX 3050 Laptop0003

      • RAM

        8 GB, DDR4

      • SSD drive

        512 GB SSD

      • Display

        9000 15. 6 «1920×1080 144 Gz

      • 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

      • MSI GF63 Thin 11UD-221RU

        • Processor

          Intel Core i5-11400H 2700MHz

        • Graphics Card

          GeForce® RTX 302 GeForce® RTX 302 GeForce® RTX 302 Laptop Notebook0002 NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 3060 6 GB for laptops

        • RAM

          8 GB, DDR4

        • SSD Driver

          512 GB SSD

        • Display

          14 «19,0002 14» 19000 24000 14 «19000 24000 14» 19000 24000 14 «19000 24000 14» system

          Without operating system

      • HP Victus 16-e0077ur

        • processor

          AMD Ryzen 5 5600H 3300 MHz 9002

          Video card

          NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 3060 6 GB for laptops

        • RAM

          8 GB, DDR4

        • SSD drive

          9000 512 GB SSD

        • 9000

        • operating system

          Windows 10

      • HP Victus 16-e0080ur

        • processor

          AMD 9000H3 50300H3 5000H50029

        • Video card

          NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 3060 6 GB for laptops

        • RAM

          8 GB, DDR4

        • SSD drive

          512 GB SSD

          9

        • 9AT

        • operating system

          No operating system

      • Acer Predator Triton 300 PT314-51s-569U

        • 3 processor

          Intel Core i5-11300H 3100 MHz

        • Video Card

          NVIDIA GEFORCE® RTX 3060 6 GB for laptops

        • RAM

          16 GB 9000 9000

          2 SSD SSD PAIGH

        • Display

          14 «1920×1080 144 Hz

        • Operating system

          without the operating system

          • ASUS TUF GAMING A15 FA507RR-HQ00

            • Processor

              AMD Ryzen 7 6800h 3200 MHz

            • Video Card

              NVIDIA GEFORCE® RTX 3070 8 GB for laptops

            • 9000 9000 SSD, DDR5 9000 9000 9000 9000, DDR5 9000 9000 9000 GB SSD

            • display

              15. 6″ 2560×1440 165Hz

            • operating system

              No operating system

          • ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR-F15.I73070

            • Processor

              Intel Core i7-12650H 3500 MHz

            • Video

              NVDX 3070 8 GB for laptops 9000

            • 9002 , DDR5

            • SSD Drum

              512 GB SSD

            • Display

              15.6 «1920×1080 144 Hz

            • Operating system

              Windows 11

          • HP OMEN 16-C0043UR

            • Processor

              AMD Ryzen 7 5800h 3200 MHz

            • Video Card

              NVIDIA GEFORCE® RTX 3070 8 GB for laptops 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 DDR4

            • SSD drive

              1024 GB SSD

            • Display

              16.1 «1920×1080 144 Hz

            • Operating system

              Windows 11

              without the operating system

          • Dell Alienware X15 R1 (X15-9956)

              Processor

              Intel Core I7-11800H 2300 MHz 230 MHb 2300 GB

              NVIDIA GEFORCERKE.

            • RAM

              32 GB, DDR4

            • SSD drive

              512 GB SSD

            • Display

              15.6 «1920×1080 165 Gz

              9000 9000

              002 Display

              16 «2560×1600 165 Hz

            • Operating system

              Windows 11

          Watch all gaming laptops

          AMD Ryzen 5 5600G against Ryzen 5 3400G: Comparation

          VS

          AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

          AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

          Which is better: 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 5600G at 3.9 GHz or Ryzen 5 3400G with 4 cores at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

          1. Overview
          2. Differences
          3. Performance
          4. Features
          5. Comments

          Overview

          Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

          Single-threaded performance

          Single-core benchmark rating

          Ryzen 5 5600G

          78

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          955

          Multi-threaded performance 30002 Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei are involved in all nuclei

          Ryzen 5 5600g

          52

          Ryzen 5 3400g

          25,0003

          Energy

          Energy Effects Chip

          Ryzen 5 5600g

          69

          Ryzen 5 3400g

          Ryzen 5 3400g 9000 9000

          NanoReview Rating

          Final Processor Score

          Ryzen 5 5600G

          66

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          47

          Key differences

          What are the main differences between 3400G and 5600G

          Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

          • Has 12MB more L3 cache
          • Introduced 1 year and 9 months later than rival
          • Supports up to 128GB DDR4-3200
          • nanometers
          • Has 2 physical cores more
          • 54% faster in Geekbench v5 single core test — 1493 and 972 points
          • 5% faster Turbo Boost frequency (4. 4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)

          Benchmark tests

          Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

          Cinebench R23 (single core)

          Ryzen 5 5600G
          +40%

          1501

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          1075

          Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

          Ryzen 5 5600G
          +131%

          11241

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          4857

          Passmark CPU (Single Core)

          Ryzen 5 5600G
          +35%

          3189

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          2366

          Passmark CPU (multi-core)

          Ryzen 5 5600G
          +111%

          19877

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          9404

          Geekbench 5 (Single Core)

          Ryzen 5 5600G
          +54%

          1501

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          972

          Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

          Ryzen 5 5600G
          +93%

          7591

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          3937

          ▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

          Specifications

          AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Ryzen 5 3400G full technical specifications list

          General information

          Manufacturer AMD AMD
          Release date April 13, 2021 July 7, 2019
          Type Desktop Desktop
          Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
          Codename Cezanne Picasso
          Socket AM4 AM4
          Integrated graphics Radeon RX Vega 7 Radeon RX Vega 11

          Performance

          Number of cores 6 4
          Number of threads 12 8
          Frequency 3. 9 GHz 3.7 GHz
          Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.4 GHz 4.2 GHz
          Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
          Multiplier 39x 37x
          Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 96KB (per core)
          Level 2 cache 512KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
          Level 3 cache 16MB (shared) 4MB (shared)
          Unlocked multiplier Yes Yes

          Power consumption

          Number of transistors 10.7 billion 4.9 billion
          Process 7 nanometers 12 nanometers
          Power consumption (TDP) 45-65W 45-65W
          Critical temperature 95°C 95°C
          Integrated graphics Radeon RX Vega 7 Radeon RX Vega 11
          GPU clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
          Boost GPU frequency 1900 MHz 1300 MHz
          Shader blocks 448 704
          TMUs 28 44
          ROPs 7 8
          Compute units 11
          TGP 10-45W 65 W
          Max. resolution 3840×2160 — 60Hz

          Igpu Flops

          Ryzen 5 5600g

          1.108 Teraflops

          Ryzen 5 3400G

          1.746 Teraflops

          Support memory

          9000

          DDR4-3200 DDR4-2933 Max. size 128 GB 64 GB Number of channels 2 2 Max. bandwidth — 43.71 GB/s ECC support No Yes

          Other

          website

          website

          Official site AMD Ryzen 5 5600G AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
          PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
          Max. PCI Express lanes 24 8

          Poll

          What processor do you think is the best?

          Ryzen 5 5600G

          319 (73.