i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Red Dead Redemption 2 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz
Red Dead Redemption 2
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
i7-7700K
Ryzen 5 3600
Multi-Thread Performance
12043 Pts
19634 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2583 Pts
2900 Pts
Red Dead Redemption 2
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Red Dead Redemption 2 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-7700K
Ryzen 5 3600
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
40.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
42.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
32.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
34. |
| 2160p |
20.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
21.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
28.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
30.0 FPS |
High Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
72.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
75.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
60.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
63.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
40.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
42.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
54.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
56.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
104.6 FPS |
| 1080p |
108.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
88. |
| 1440p |
92.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
61.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
63.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
79.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
82.6 FPS |
6 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
169.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
175.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
144.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
150.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
101.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
105.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
130.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
135.2 FPS |
i7-7700K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i7-7700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture
| i7-7700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Kaby Lake | Zen 2 |
| Generation | Core i7 (Kaby Lake) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR33A | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jan 2017 | Jul 2019 |
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache
| i7-7700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores
| i7-7700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD 630 | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features
| i7-7700K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Notes
| i7-7700K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance
| i7-7700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4. 2 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 42.0x | 36.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| TDP | 91 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.5 GHz | up to 4.2 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical
| i7-7700K | Ryzen 5 3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | unknown | 4,800 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share Your Comments 96
Compare i7-7700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-7700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-7700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-7700K on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i7-7700K | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Kaby Lake | Zen 2 | ||||||
| Core name | Kaby Lake-S | Matisse | ||||||
| Family | Core i7-7000 | Ryzen 5 3000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BXC80677I77700K, BX80677I77700K, CM8067702868535, SR33A, QKHB |
100-000000031, 100-000000031BOX |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2017 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm FinFET | ||||||
| Transistors | 2. 150.000.000 |
4.800.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 4,2 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,5 GHz | 4,2 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 32 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-3200 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 38,4 GB/s | 47,68 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 91 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 | None | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | — | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1150 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 384 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 95°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
— | ||||||
| Security | Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
— | ||||||
| Max display resolution | 4096×2304@60Hz | — | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 574 | 509 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 3. 004 |
4.039 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 200 | 195 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 995 | 1.564 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.207 | 1.215 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 6.074 | 9.109 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.736 | 2.570 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 9.687 | 17.842 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.555 | 5.470 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
18. 316 |
27.530 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
326,1 GFLOPS | 484 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
201 pts / W | 424 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-7700K is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
509 4.039 |
| Intel Core i7-7700K |
574 3.004 |
In single core, the difference is 13%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
195 1.564 |
| Intel Core i7-7700K |
200 995 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
1.215 9.109 |
| Intel Core i7-7700K |
1.207 6.074 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 50%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
2.570 17.842 |
| Intel Core i7-7700K |
2.736 9.687 |
In single core, the difference is 6%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 84%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.470 27.530 |
| Intel Core i7-7700K |
5.555 18.316 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 50%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.782 30.309 |
| Intel Core i7-7700K |
5.887 16.660 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 82%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.610 27.268 |
| Intel Core i7-7700K |
4.560 14.945 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 82%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5. 
|