AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S… |
BFV 3% | 1 % | SotTR 2%, MetroEx 1%, Divis2 2% | |||
05 Nov20|Techpowerup AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review |
Witcher3 1%, ACO 5%, MetroEx 3% | 1 % | FarC5 4%, BFV 1%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 1%, Civ6 5%, Sekiro 0%, Wolf2 1% | |||
05 Nov20|Techpowerup AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review |
Witcher3 1%, ACO 5%, MetroEx 3% | 1 % | FarC5 4%, BFV 1%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 1%, Civ6 5%, Sekiro 0%, Wolf2 1% |
Memory Avg. |
90.9 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +8% |
84.1 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
140 Pts | 162 Pts | Faster single-core speed. +16% |
|||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
279 Pts | 315 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. +13% |
|||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
552 Pts | 579 Pts | +5% | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
964 Pts | Slightly faster octa-core speed. +9% |
881 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
96.![]() |
+2% | 94.3 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
155 Pts | 173 Pts | Faster OC single-core speed. +12% |
|||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
309 Pts | 344 Pts | Faster OC dual-core speed. +11% |
|||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
618 Pts | 669 Pts | Slightly faster OC quad-core speed. +8% |
|||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
1123 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed. +14% |
983 Pts |
Age Newest |
51 Months | 27 Months | Much more recent.![]() +47% |
|||
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
95 Watts | 65 Watts | Much more energy efficient. +32% |
|||
Cores CPU Processing Cores |
8 cores | Much higher core count. +33% |
6 cores | |||
Threads CPU Processing Threads |
8 threads | 12 threads | Much higher thread count. +50% |
|||
Lithography Manufacturing process |
14 nm | 7 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +50% |
|||
Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz | +3% | |||
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
4.![]() |
Slightly faster turbo frequency. +7% |
4.6 GHz | |||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
1145 Pts | 1168 Pts | +2% | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
1001 Pts | 1058 Pts | Slightly faster 64-core speed. +6% |
Series CPU Architecture |
Coffee Lake | Zen3 | ||||
Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1151 | AM4 | ||||
Graphics Integrated Graphics |
UHD 630 | None |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-9700K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on one side and the Intel Core i7-9700K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-9700K | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen 3 | Coffee Lake | ||||||
Core name | Vermeer | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 5 5000 | Core i7-9000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
100-000000065, |
BX80684I79700K, |
||||||
Release date | Q4 2020 | Q4 2018 | ||||||
Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 14 nm++ | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 8 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,6 GHz | 4,9 GHz | ||||||
High performance cores |
6 Cores 12 Threads @ 3,7 / 4,6 GHz |
— |
||||||
Cache memory | 32 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR4-3200 |
DDR4-2666 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 47,68 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 24 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 95 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 23 | ||||||
GPU shading units | — | 184 | ||||||
GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | — | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
Crypto engine |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
Security |
Enhanced Virus Protection |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x [email protected] |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 629 | 554 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 4.![]() |
4.158 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 261 | 211 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.971 | 1.510 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 605 | 521 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 4.434 | 3.731 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.531 | 1.273 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 11.190 | 9.419 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 3.378 | 2.908 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 22.![]() |
14.549 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
6.975 | 6.084 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
33.553 | 29.763 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.616 | 1.314 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
8.275 | 7.464 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
408 GFLOPS | 424,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
516 pts / W | 313 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i7-9700K has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-9700K is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
629 4.871 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
554 4.158 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 17%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
261 1. ![]() |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
211 1.510 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
605 4. ![]() |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
521 3.731 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
1.531 11. ![]() |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.273 9.419 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
3. ![]() 22.192 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
2.908 14.549 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 53%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
6.975 33. ![]() |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.084 29.763 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
6.975 38.157 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.057 24.055 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 59%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
5.583 28.808 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
5. ![]() 24.482 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
9.573 46.982 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.229 31.150 |
In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 51%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
1.616 8.275 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.314 7.464 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
1.752 9.040 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.380 7.645 |
In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
On macOS:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
1.654 8.416 |
Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.254 7.725 |
In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 9%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.