AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 1700: performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
We compared two 8-core desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X against the 3.0 GHz Ryzen 7 1700. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700X
50
Ryzen 7 1700
43
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Ryzen 7 2700X
39
Ryzen 7 1700
32
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Ryzen 7 2700X
47
Ryzen 7 1700
45
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Ryzen 7 2700X
46
Ryzen 7 1700
40
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 1700 and 2700X
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Newer — released 1-year and 2-months later
- More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
- 16% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz)
- Around 3.97 GB/s (10%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 12% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1074 vs 957 points
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+15%
1095
Ryzen 7 1700
949
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+25%
10051
Ryzen 7 1700
8042
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+21%
2415
Ryzen 7 1700
1994
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+18%
17554
Ryzen 7 1700
14836
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+12%
1072
Ryzen 7 1700
955
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+17%
7310
Ryzen 7 1700
6251
Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 1700
General
| Vendor | AMD | AMD |
| Released | April 19, 2018 | March 2, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| P-Cores | 8 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 3.7 GHz | 3.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 4. 3 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 30x |
| L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistors | 4.8 billions | 4.8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| TDP | 105 W | 65 W |
| Peak temperature | 85°C | 95°C |
Memory Support
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| Official site | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X official page | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Ryzen 7 2700X
5 (50%)
Ryzen 7 1700
5 (50%)
Total votes: 10
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
2.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
3.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Core i7 12700K
4.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
5.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Compare other CPUs (480+)
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 or Ryzen 7 2700X?
Name
Message
Promotion
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Gaming Benchmarks vs 1700 at 4GHz, 10% Faster on Average
Another day another Ryzen 7 2700X review makes its way to the web. This time we get to take a look at how 2nd generation Ryzen compares to its first generation predecessor in gaming and productivity benchmarks.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Gaming Benchmarks vs 1700 at 4GHz, 10% Faster on Average
The Ryzen 7 2700X was put in a head-to-head comparison with an overclocked Ryzen 7 1700 at 4.0GHz paired with a custom water cooling loop. At stock clocks, the Ryzen 7 2700X managed to outperform the 1700 by up to 14%, thanks to lower cache and memory latency and better inter-core communication in addition to very smart Turbo functionality.
2 of 9
The productivity benchmarks are not any less impressive with the Ryzen 7 2700X showing a performance lead of up to 13% at stock clocks versus the overclocked Ryzen 7 1700. The first generation Ryzen part simply can’t keep up, even with a hefty 4.0GHz overclock on a custom liquid cooling loop.
This demonstrates that second generation Ryzen CPUs aren’t just «factory overclocked» first Ryzen 1000 series parts as some have suspected. The small micro-architectural refinements to the cache and memory subsystems do seem to play a decently significant role in helping the 2700X maintain a clock for clock lead over the Ryzen 7 1700.
The cleverness of the new XFR2 turbo frequency algorithm is also clearly allowing the Ryzen 7 2700X to hit higher clock speeds without inflicting a disproportionate rise in power consumption.
The official embargo on 2nd generation Ryzen ends on the 19th, so stay tuned for more reviews and benchmarks to come out in a couple of days.
AMD 2nd Generation Ryzen Specs:
| CPU Name | AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Family | Ryzen 2 | Ryzen 2 | Ryzen 2 | Ryzen 2 | Ryzen 2 | Ryzen 2 |
| CPU uArch | 12nm Zen+ | 12nm Zen+ | 12nm Zen+ | 12nm Zen+ | 12nm Zen+ | 12nm Zen+ |
| CPU Cores | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Threads | 4 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 16 |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz | 3,6 GHz | 3.2 GHz | 3. 7 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.0 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 4.25 GHz | 4.1 GHz | 4.35 GHz |
| Total Cache | 10 MB (L2+L3) | 18 MB (L2+L3) | 19 MB (L2+L3) | 19 MB (L2+L3) | 20 MB (L2 + L3) | 20 MB (L2 + L3) |
| Memory Support | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| TDP | 65W | 65W | 65W | 95W | 65W | 105W |
| Cooler Bundle | Wraith Stealth | Wraith Stealth | Wraith Stealth | Wraith Spire | Wraith Spire LED | Wraith Prism |
| Price | $130-$140 US | $150-$160 US | $199 US | $229 US | $299 US | $329 US |
| Release Date | TBC | TBC | 19th April 2018 | 19th April 2018 | 19th April 2018 | 19th April 2018 |
News Source: Ryzen 7 2700X Review — Part 1: Zen Vs Zen+ Vs Intel i7
Share this story
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/cpu/ryzen-7-1700-protiv-ryzen-7-2700%23technologies
Popular video card comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1060 6GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular video cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular 9 processor comparisons0008
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular processors
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 7 1700 — Should gamers buy a budget 8-core processor in 2020
Blogs
Zelot Post rewarded
Exploring the prospect of buying an 8-core processor here and now
recommendations
Ryzen 1st and 2nd generations remain one of AMD’s best-selling processors.
Among them, a special place is occupied by 8-core chips. It is believed that they will be relevant for a long time. In addition, it is indicated that, with a slight overclocking, they are able to show performance miracles in modern games and work tasks. Experts from the adoredtv site decided to test this hypothesis. They used the standard overclocking capabilities without resorting to water procedures. What they did, we now see.
The results of the 1st and 2nd generation look very interesting. The real difference between them is minimal. If we compare both processors with the Ryzen 7 3700X, then we can note the undoubted advantage of the 7nm process technology and the Zen 2 architecture. If we add up all the tests, the gap between the first two generations is 30%, which no longer attracts the small difference that experts often talk about . But in games the situation changes. The difference between Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 2700 was only 10%. At the same time, the first generation lagged behind by another 5%.