AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700: What is the difference?
50points
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
55points
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i7-8700
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700X better than Intel Core i7-8700?
- 1.54x faster CPU speed?
8 x 3.7GHzvs6 x 3.2GHz - 267MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
16vs12 - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm - 2.5MB bigger L2 cache?
4MBvs1.5MB - 14.16% higher PassMark result?
17623vs15437 - 4MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs12MB - 384KB bigger L1 cache?
768KBvs384KB
Why is Intel Core i7-8700 better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X?
- 15°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs85°C - 0.
3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.6GHzvs4.3GHz - 40W lower TDP?
65Wvs105W - Has integrated graphics?
- 6.44% higher PassMark result (single)?
2594vs2437 - 17.03% higher Cinebench R20 (single) result?
481vs411
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Apple M1
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i5-8500
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i7-8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i5-9400
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
2 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
9.
0/10
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-8700
0 User reviews
Intel Core i7-8700
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
8.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
8.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
9.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
7.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 3.7GHz
6 x 3.2GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.3GHz
4.6GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i7-8700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.
25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i7-8700
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-8700
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-8700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i7-8700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i7-8700
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i7 8700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.2 GHz Intel Core i7 8700 with 6-cores against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X with 8-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 8700
63
Ryzen 7 2700X
57
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 8700
36
Ryzen 7 2700X
48
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 8700
44
Ryzen 7 2700X
46
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 8700
48
Ryzen 7 2700X
53
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2700X and 8700
Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than the Ryzen 7 2700X – 65 vs 105 Watt
- More than 15° C higher critical temperature
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 7% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
6 GHz vs 4.3 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
- More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
- Newer — released 7-months later
- Around 2.11 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700
+11%
1213
Ryzen 7 2700X
1092
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700
7115
Ryzen 7 2700X
+42%
10131
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700
+9%
2643
Ryzen 7 2700X
2423
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700
12926
Ryzen 7 2700X
+35%
17398
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700
+9%
1161
Ryzen 7 2700X
1070
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700
6164
Ryzen 7 2700X
+19%
7328
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 8700 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | October 5, 2017 | April 19, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen+ |
| Model number | i7-8700 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 2 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 32x | 37x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Transistors | — | 4.8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 105 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | 85°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
| Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 7 2700X
n/a
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 8700 official page | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 20 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 8700
2 (28.6%)
Ryzen 7 2700X
5 (71.4%)
Total votes: 7
ompetitors
1.
Core i7 8700 and Core i7 12700K
2.
Core i7 8700 and Core i5 12600K
3.
Core i7 8700 and Core i5 12400F
4.
Core i7 8700 and Core i7 12700KF
5.
Core i7 8700 and Core i3 12100
6.
Core i7 8700 and Core i3 12100F
7.
Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 5600X
8.
Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 5800X
9.
Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X on one side and the Intel Core i7-8700 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,3GHz.
The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-8700 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 7 2000 | Core i7-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | YD270XBGM88AF | BX80684I78700, BXC80684I78700, CM8068403358316, BOC80684I78700, BO80684I78700, SR3QS |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q4 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
1.800.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 16 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,3 GHz | 4,6 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 105 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 23 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 184 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 85°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | — | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
| Security | — | Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
||||||
| Max display resolution | — | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 476 | 489 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 5. 031 |
3.865 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 180 | 184 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.828 | 1.396 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.118 | 1.151 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 11.289 | 8.956 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.428 | 2.665 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 17.584 | 13.082 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.823 | 5.288 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
26. 797 |
23.378 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
384,3 GFLOPS | 406,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
255 pts / W | 360 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-8700 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-8700 is less. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
476 5.031 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
489 3.865 |
In single core, the difference is -3%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 30%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
180 1.828 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
184 1.396 |
In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
1.118 11.289 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
1.151 8.956 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
2.428 17.584 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
2.665 13.082 |
In single core, the difference is -9%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 34%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.823 26.797 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
5.288 23.378 |
In single core, the difference is -9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
6.041 26.876 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
5.027 26.264 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
4.276 14.464 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.044 13.431 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.  82026.430 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
5.742 25.519 |
In single core, the difference is -16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-8700 AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700U
Intel Core i7-870Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-8700TIntel Core i7-8705GIntel Core i7-8706G
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-8700
Availability
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy on Amazon
$245
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Availability
Intel Core i7-8700 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.
6 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy on Amazon
$310
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 108 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
-
Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-8700 — $245.0 vs $310.0
-
Up to 19% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-8700 — $0.96 vs $1.19 per FPS
-
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 — 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
256
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.
96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for $245 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
261
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
81%
Price, $
$310
79%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-8700 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $310 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
256
FPS
261
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
1026
FPS
1046
FPS
League of Legends
446
FPS
456
FPS
VALORANT
1367
FPS
1395
FPS
Minecraft
280
FPS
286
FPS
Apex Legends
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1039
90%
Multi-Core
6842
100%
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1155
100%
Multi-Core
5811
82%
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
vs |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
|---|---|---|
|
Apr 19th, 2018 |
Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
|
8 |
Cores | 6 |
|
16 |
Threads | 12 |
|
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
4.6 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP |
65 W |
|
12 nm |
Process Size | 14 nm |
|
37.0x |
Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
|
Yes |
Overclockable | No |
7 GHzBuilds Using Ryzen 7 2700X or Core i7-8700
Grand Theft Auto V, 1080p, High
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
152 FPS
$13.16/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,999.99
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Dell Inspiron High Performance Gaming Desktop PC
93 FPS
$20.42/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,899
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
HP Z2 G4 Workstation — 1 X Intel Core i7 (8th Gen) i7-8700 Hexa-core (6 Core) 3.
20 GHz — 16 GB DDR4 SDRAM — 256 GB SSD — Intel UHD Graphics 630 Graphics — Windows 10 Pro (English) — Mini-Tower — Black PC
44 FPS
$36.34/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
16 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,599
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Dell XPS 8930-7764BLK-PUS Tower Desktop PC
44 FPS
$35.59/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,565.99
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC
146 FPS
$9.78/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,428.35
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
ROG Strix GL10CS Gaming Desktop PC
81 FPS
$20.98/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050
Core i7-8700
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,699
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Elite Gaming PC
126 FPS
$19.
83/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060
Core i7-8700
8 GB, 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,499
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Dell Optiplex 7060 SFF Desktop PC
44 FPS
$34.05/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,498
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
2019_Dell Alien.Ware Gaming Desktop PC
151 FPS
$16.55/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070
Core i7-8700
16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,499
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Dell Optiplex 7060 SFF Desktop PC
44 FPS
$34.07/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
24 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i7-8700
Core i5-3570K
$103.58
Ryzen 7 2700X
Celeron 3855U
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
Xeon E3-1280 v5
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
Core 2 Duo L7500
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
Core 2 Duo T5900
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
Core 2 Duo P9500
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
Xeon Gold 6126
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
Xeon W3580
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 2700X
Celeron N2840
N/A Stock
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Fortnite Battle Royale with RTX 2070 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
RTX 2070 with
Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz
Fortnite Battle Royale
RTX 2070 with
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
i7-8700
Ryzen 7 2700X
Multi-Thread Performance
15150 Pts
16960 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2628 Pts
2190 Pts
Fortnite Battle Royale
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X in Fortnite Battle Royale using RTX 2070 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-8700
Ryzen 7 2700X
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
122. |
| 1080p |
112.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
77.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
71.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
41.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
38.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
64.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
58.5 FPS |
6 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
186.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
173.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
127.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
118.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
75.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
69.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
108.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
100.0 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
251. |
| 1080p |
234.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
177.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
165.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
108.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
100.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
152.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
141.5 FPS |
3 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
379.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
357.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
276.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
259.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
174.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
162.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
240.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
224.6 FPS |
i7-8700
- The i7-8700 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The i7-8700 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 7 2700X
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
| i7-8700 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3QS | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jan 2018 | Apr 2018 |
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
| i7-8700 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
| i7-8700 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features
| i7-8700 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 XFR 2 |
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
| i7-8700 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32.0x | 37.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 65 W | 105 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.6 GHz | up to 4.35 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
| i7-8700 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | 192 mm² |
| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | µOPGA-1331 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Transistors | unknown | 4800 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | unknown |
Share Your Comments 95
Compare i7-8700 vs Ryzen 7 2700X in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
120%
-
Intel Core i7-8700
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
100%
-
Intel Core i7-8700
109%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
149%
-
Intel Core i7-8700
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 49% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-8700 |
| 9% higher single threaded performance. |
| 40 watts lower power draw. |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-8700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SMT | ||||
| XFR | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 |
||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| HTT | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
| Boost 2.0 | ||||
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-8700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen+ | vs | Intel_Coffelake | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
| Codename | Zen | vs | Coffee Lake | |
| Release Date | Mar 2018 | vs | Jan 2018 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-8700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | vs | 6 | |
| Threads | 16 | vs | 12 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Intel UHD 630 |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-8700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 16384 KB (shared) | vs | 12288 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-8700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 1151 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 151mm² | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i7-8700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3700 MHz | vs | 3200 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4350 MHz | vs | 4600 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | variable | vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 105 W | vs | 65 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
4785 points
-
Intel Core i7-8700
5520 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
39723 points
-
Intel Core i7-8700
27648 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs Intel Core i7-8700: What is the difference?
57 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
55 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-8700
Why AMD RY better than Intel Core i7-8700?
- 33.
33% higher CPU speed?
8 x 3.2GHz vs 6 x 3.2GHz - 267MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
16 vs 12 - Are the semiconductors smaller than 2nm?
12nm vs 14nm - 2.5MB more L2 cache?
4MB vs 1.5MB - 4MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 12MB - 384KB more L1 cache?
768KB vs 384KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
Why is Intel Core i7-8700 better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700?
- 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 95°C - 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.6GHz vs 4.1GHz - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 16.95% higher PassMark score (single)?
2594 vs 2218 - 19.35% better than Cinebench R20 (single core)?
481 vs 403 - Has NX bit?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD RYZEN 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 9000
AMD Ry Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Apple M1
AMD RYZEN 7 2700
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i7-8700
9000 VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3 AMD RYZEN 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 -8700
VS
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i7-8700
I7-7700
AMD Ryzen 7 22 vs
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i5-8500
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
9000 INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE IME vs
Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i5-9400
Complexation prices
Users Reviews
General rating
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
2 Reviews of Users
AMD RYZEN 10.
0 /10
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-8700
0 User reviews
Intel Core i7-8700
User reviewsOl000 Productivity
10.0 /10
2 Votes
Reviews not yet
Reliability
10.0 /10
2 VOTES
reviews are not yet
Energy efficiency
/10
2 VOTES
Reviews are not
1. Specific central processor
9000 8 x 3.2GHZ
6 x 3.2GHZ
The speed of the central processor shows how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, taking into account all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.
speed turbo clock
4.1GHz
4.6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✖Intel Core i7-8700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✖Intel Core i7-8700
The memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
243.7seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
750.9seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✔Intel Core i7-8700
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.
Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✔Intel Core i7-8700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✔Intel Core i7-8700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700
✖Intel Core i7-8700
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i7 8700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i7 8700 at 3.2 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 2700 with 8 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core i7 8700
63
Ryzen 7 2700
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei
Core I7 8700 9000 36
Ryzen 7 2700
43
Power Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Core i7 8700
44
Ryzen 7 2700
Rating NanoreView
Final rating of the processor
Core i7 8700
9000
Ryzen 7 2700
50
Key differences
What are the main differences between 2700 and 8700
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700
- Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2666
- 15% faster in Geekbench v5 single core test — 1172 and 1016 points
- Integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 12% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.
6 GHz vs. 4.1 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 12 versus 14 nanometers later than
- 2.11 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
rival
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 8700
+15%
1213
Ryzen 7 2700
1055
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700
4 7115 900
+26%
8934
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 8700
+21%
2643
Ryzen 7 2700
2181
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 8700
12926
Ryzen 7 2700
+21%
15591
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 8700
+15%
1161
Ryzen 7 2700
1008
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700
90 Ryzen 7 6164 7000 2
+10%
6753
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 8700 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | October 5, 2017 | April 19, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen+ |
| Model number | i7-8700 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
| Frequency | 3. 2 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 32x | 36x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 4.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700
0.38 teraflops
Ryzen 7 2700
n/a
4 memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC 9 support0753 | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 8700 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 website |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 8700
2 (22.
2%)
Ryzen 7 2700
7 (77.8%)
Total votes: 9
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i7 12700K and Intel Core i7 8700
2.
Intel Core i5 12600K and Intel Core i7 8700
3.
Intel Core i5 12400F and Intel Core i7 8700
4.
Intel Core i7 12700KF and Intel Core i7 8700
5.
Intel Core i3 12100 and Intel Core i7 8700
6.
Intel Core i3 12100F and Intel Core i7 8700
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 or Intel Core i7 8700?
Name
Message
Compare AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and Intel Core i7-8700
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and Intel Core i7-8700 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Image quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Safety and reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
versus
Intel Core i7-8700
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Newer processor, release dates difference 1 year(s) 3 month(s), processor unlocked easily
- 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 6
- 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm FinFET vs 14 nm
- L1 cache is 2 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Cache L2 is 2.
7 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access - L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark benchmark — CPU mark is about 21% more: 15785 vs 13006
- About 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 6255 vs 5903
- About 4% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 7478 vs 7161
make overclocking
| 1 | 19 April 2018 vs 5 January 2017 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 12 |
| Process | 12nm FinFET vs 14nm |
| Level 1 cache | 768 KB vs 384 KB |
| Level 2 cache | 4MB vs 1. 5MB |
| Level 3 cache | 16 MB vs 12288 KB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 15785 vs 13006 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 6255 vs 5903 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 7478 vs 7161 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-8700
- About 12% more clock speed: 4.60 GHz vs 4.1 GHz
- About 5% more maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95°C
- Benchmark performance PassMark — Single thread mark about 21% higher: 2655 vs 2193
- Approximately 25% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1173 vs 940
| Maximum frequency | 4. 60 GHz vs 4.1 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 95°C |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2655 vs 2193 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1173 vs 940 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 7 2700
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-8700
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | Intel Core i7-8700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2193 | 2655 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 15785 | 13006 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 940 | 1173 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 6255 | 5903 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 7478 | 7161 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
2.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2171 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
4740 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 7902 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2171 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 4740 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 7902 |
Feature comparison
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | Intel Core i7-8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Zen+ | Coffee Lake |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
| Issue date | April 19, 2018 | January 5, 2017 |
| Price at first issue date | $299 | $312 |
| OPN PIB | YD2700BBAFBOX | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in the rating | 638 | 488 |
| Price now | $265. 99 |
$439.98 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 Desktop Processors | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 16.67 | 10.15 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | i7-8700 | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 2 GHz |
3.20 GHz |
| Crystal area | 213 mm | |
| Level 1 cache | 768KB | 384KB |
| Level 2 cache | 4MB | 1.5MB |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB | 12288KB |
| Process | 12nm FinFET | 14nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4. 1 GHz |
4.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 12 |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41. 6 GB/s |
|
| Maximum memory size | 128GB | |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Supported sockets | AM4 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Spire with RGB LED | PCG 2015C (65W) |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
|
| PCI Express revision | 3.0×16 | 3.0 |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
| AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD StoreMI technology | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Device ID | 0x3E92 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 20 GHz |
|
| Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Video memory size | 64GB | |
| Integrated graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | |
| 4K support | ||
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs.
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 runs with 8 and 16 CPU threads It runs at 4.10 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to CPU socket AM4 This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on a single chip, supports 2 to support DDR4-2933 RAM and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 20. Tjunction is kept below 95°C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) architecture is advanced beyond 12 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q2/2018
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i7-8700 runs with 6 and 16 CPU threads It runs at 4.60 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to LGA 1151-2 CPU socket This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-8700
20 GHz Intel UHD Graphics 630
Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS.
GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula.