Sempron 3400+ [in 1 benchmark]
AMD
Sempron 3400+
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD Sempron 3400+ sales on August 2005 at a recommended price of $30. Based on Manila architecture, this desktop processor is primarily aimed at home systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread, and is based on 90 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2000 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket AM2 processor with a TDP of 62 Watt.
We have no data on Sempron 3400+ benchmark results.
General info
Sempron 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance rating | not rated | |
Market segment | Desktop processor | |
Architecture codename | Manila (2001−2006) | |
Release date | August 2005 (17 years ago) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | of 305 (Core i7-870) |
Current price | $21 (0.7x MSRP) | of 16317 (EPYC 7351) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | |
Threads | 1 | |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | of 5. 8 (Core i9-13900K) |
L1 cache | 128 KB | of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401) |
L2 cache | 256K | of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | of 5 (Apple M1) |
Die size | 103 mm2 | |
Number of transistors | 81 million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 9 7950X) |
64 bit support | + | |
Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
Socket | AM2 | |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 62 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Sempron 3400+. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
- Passmark
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 69%
Sempron 3400+
292
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended graphics cards
These graphics cards are most commonly used with Sempron 3400+ according to our statistics.
GeForce
6100 + nForce 405
13.3%
GeForce Go
6150
13.3%
GeForce GTX
660
6.7%
GeForce
9500 GT
6. 7%
GeForce GT
630M
6.7%
GeForce GTS
250
6.7%
Radeon
Xpress 1100
6.7%
GeForce
6150 LE
6.7%
Radeon HD
5450
6.7%
GeForce
6150 SE + nForce 430
6.7%
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Sempron 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/sempron-3400-plus%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Sempron 3400+ processor [in 1 benchmark]
AMD
Sempron 3400+
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD Sempron 3400+ sales in August 2005 at a suggested price of $30. This is a Manila architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread and is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2000 MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket AM2 processor with a TDP of 62W.
We have no test results for the Sempron 3400+.
General
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Sempron 3400+, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Performance ranking | ||
price now | $ 21 (0.7x) | of 16317 (EPYC 7351) |
characteristics
Sempron 3400+ quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
Core 9550) | |||||
cache 3rd level | 0 KB | of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998) | |||
900 Nm Nm | |||||
Crystal size | 103 mm 2 | ||||
Transistors | 81 million | of 9
0 (Ryzen 97950x) |
|||
Support 64 bit | + | ||||
Compatibility with Windows 11 |
Information on Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
PassmarkPassmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. Benchmark coverage: 69%
Sempron 3400+ Other processorsHere we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. Recommended video cardsAccording to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with Sempron 3400+: 13. 3% 13.3% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% User ratingHere you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating. Tips and commentsHere you can ask a question about the Sempron 3400+ processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. AMD Sempron 3400+ Palermo specifications: tests, competitors, price
Sempron 3400+ Number Number — 1, 90 NMs are produced by the technology project. The base frequency of the Sempron 3400+ cores is 1.8 GHz. Please note that the AMD Sempron 3400+ cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 62W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase. Thanks to the built-in N/A video core, the computer can work without a discrete graphics card because the monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. Price in RussiaDo you want to buy Sempron 3400+ cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city. Family
AMD Sempron 3400+ benchmarksGame performancePerformance in games and similar applications, according to our tests. The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores. The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important. Speed in office usePerformance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications. The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. Speed in heavy applicationsPerformance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores. The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly. At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor. Speed of numerical operations
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario. We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS. Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads. Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems. CompareBenchmarksBenchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. PassmarkAMD Athlon 64 3000+ 303 Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz 302 Intel Atom Z2760 298 Intel Atom N550 295 AMD Athlon 64 3800+ 292 AMD Sempron 3400+ 292 AMD Athlon 64 3800+ 292 292 AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 286 AMD ATHLON 2650E 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9000 274 9EL0002 268 AMD C-50 265 Tests in gamesFPS measured by us in popular games on AMD Sempron 3400+ and compliance with system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay. On average for all gaming tests, the processor scored 24.7 points out of 100, where 100 is the fastest gaming processor to date.
We’ve put together a list of the parts that users most frequently choose when building a Sempron 3400+ based computer. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved. The most popular config: motherboard for AMD Sempron 3400+ — Biostar N61PA-M2S, video card — GeForce 8400 GS. FeaturesBasic
Performance
Cache and RAM
Video core
PCIDetails
CompetitorsPlease note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. |