Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 vs Nvidia Tegra X2 T186
|
|
|
|
|
Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 vs Nvidia Tegra X2 T186
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 on one side and the Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the video game console sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 1,9GHz. The second is used on the single-board computer segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 | Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Video game console | Single-board computer | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A57, Cortex-A72 | Denver2, Cortex-A57 | ||||||
| Family | Tegra X1 | Tegra X2 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Tegra X1 T210, Erista | Tegra X2 T186, Parker | ||||||
| Release date | Q2 2015 | Q3 2016 | ||||||
| Lithography | 20 nm | 16 nm FinFET | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1,3 GHz | 1,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 1,9 GHz | 2,0 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1,5 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1,2 — 2,0 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1,9 GHz | 2x Nvidia Denver2 @ 1,4 — 2,0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2,5 MB | 512 KB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 25,6 GB/s | 59,7 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Nvidia Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU | Nvidia Tegra X2 Pascal GPU | ||||||
| GPU cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 256 | 256 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 1. 000 MHz |
854 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1.000 MHz | 1.475 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 512 GFLOPS | 750,1 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.158 | 1.855 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
3.276 | 6.314 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
33,6 GFLOPS | 49,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
218 pts / W | 421 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.![](/800/600/http/static.leiphone.com/uploads/new/article/600_600/201501/54aa5fb290893.png?imageMogr2/thumbnail/1920x>/format/jpg/quality/90′ /> </p>
<p><b>On Android 64-bit:</b></p>
<p><center>
<br />
</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
</p>
<th>Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit</th>
<p>
<br />
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Nvidia Tegra X2 T186</td>
<p>
</p>
<td>
<br />
<br />
1.855<br />
<br />
6.314</td>
<p>
<br />
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nvidia Tegra X1 T210</td>
<p>
</p>
<td>
<br />
<br />
1.158<br />
<br />
3.276</td>
<p>
<br />
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<p>In single core, the difference is 60%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 93%.</p>
<p><center></p>
<p>Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an <br />average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.</p>
<p></center></p>
<p data-readability-styled="true">Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.<img loading=){kind=spacer}
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 Intel equivalentNvidia Tegra X1 T210 AMD equivalentNvidia Tegra X2 T186 Intel equivalentNvidia Tegra X2 T186 AMD equivalent
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/tegra-x1-vs-tegra-x2%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
|
3DNews Technologies and IT market. News game consoles The Switch is based on a conventional 20nm chip … The most interesting in the reviews
03/24/2017 [09:32], Konstantin Khodakovsky Hardware analysis resource Tech Insights recently updated its coverage of the Nintendo Switch hybrid console. Detailed photographs of the Tegra chip were taken and carefully examined, which was announced as a special version of the NVIDIA single-chip system, commissioned by a Japanese company. In general, many previously believed that Nintendo did not reinvent the wheel and simply used a ready-made successful NVIDIA chip without spending additional resources and funds on the development of some special version. This was also indicated by the first disassembly of the system: the chip itself, externally, and the configuration of the capacitors and other elements around it, were very similar to the updated Shield Android TV console of 2017. NVIDIA on the blog right after the first trailer of the console said that it spent 500 man-years to create the console. But if physically the Switch processor has no differences from the standard Tegra X1 chip, then what are we talking about? NVIDIA wasn’t just talking about the chip itself: it was also about system design, software, APIs, game engines, and peripherals. And in this regard, we must admit, Switch — a great achievement. Just look at the new Shield Android TV port of Tomb Raider 2013 (ported by NVIDIA’s internal Lightspeed Studios). It is far from perfect and runs at 720p with very uneven frame output. In turn, The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild achieves noticeably more impressive results at the same resolution, even at lower frequencies in mobile mode. nine0007 Unfortunately, NVIDIA’s categorical statements last year that the Switch chip is based on the same architecture as the most productive video cards (at that time they were already Pascal generation accelerators) turned out to be wrong. They then led many journalists to the idea that the Switch is based not on the relatively old Tegra X1 chip, but on the more recent and powerful Tegra X2. By and large, the difference between Pascal and Maxwell is in a thinner manufacturing process: 16 nm versus 20 nm. |
As a result, it turned out that it is no different from the standard Tegra X1 crystal used in the Shield Android TV. This chip includes 4 Cortex A57 cores paired with 4 simpler Cortex A53 cores and GeForce GM20B Maxell graphics with 256 stream processors. nine0007 
Perhaps the company under the modified version of Tegra had in mind the adaptation of existing technology for a specialized console. nine0007 