Tegra x1 vs x2: Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 vs Nvidia Tegra X2 T186

Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 vs Nvidia Tegra X2 T186








Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 vs Nvidia Tegra X2 T186

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 on one side and the Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the video game console sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 1,9GHz. The second is used on the single-board computer segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Nvidia Tegra X1 T210

Nvidia Tegra X2 T186
Market (main)

Video game console

Single-board computer
ISA

ARMv8-A (64-bit)

ARMv8.2-A (64-bit)
Microarchitecture

Cortex-A57, Cortex-A72

Denver2, Cortex-A57
Family

Tegra X1

Tegra X2
Part number(s), S-Spec

Tegra X1 T210, Erista

Tegra X2 T186, Parker
Release date

Q2 2015

Q3 2016
Lithography

20 nm

16 nm FinFET
Cores

8

6
Threads

8

6
Base frequency

1,3 GHz

1,2 GHz
Turbo frequency

1,9 GHz

2,0 GHz
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1,5 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1,2 — 2,0 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1,9 GHz

2x Nvidia Denver2 @ 1,4 — 2,0 GHz
Cache memory

2,5 MB

512 KB
Max memory capacity

8 GB

8 GB
Memory types

LPDDR3, LPDDR4

LPDDR4
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

25,6 GB/s

59,7 GB/s
TDP

15 W

15 W
GPU integrated graphics

Nvidia Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Nvidia Tegra X2 Pascal GPU
GPU cores

2

2
GPU execution units

1

1
GPU shading units

256

256
GPU base clock

1. 000 MHz

854 MHz
GPU boost clock

1.000 MHz

1.475 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

512 GFLOPS

750,1 GFLOPS
Socket

SoC

SoC
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

1.158

1.855
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

3.276

6.314
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

33,6 GFLOPS

49,5 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

218 pts / W

421 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 Intel equivalentNvidia Tegra X1 T210 AMD equivalentNvidia Tegra X2 T186 Intel equivalentNvidia Tegra X2 T186 AMD equivalent

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/tegra-x1-vs-tegra-x2%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
580



GeForce RTX
3060



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U











New Nintendo Switch and NVIDIA Shield TV will receive an improved Tegra X1

3DNews Technologies and IT market. News game consoles The Switch is based on a conventional 20nm chip …

The most interesting in the reviews


03/24/2017 [09:32],

Konstantin Khodakovsky

Hardware analysis resource Tech Insights recently updated its coverage of the Nintendo Switch hybrid console. Detailed photographs of the Tegra chip were taken and carefully examined, which was announced as a special version of the NVIDIA single-chip system, commissioned by a Japanese company. As a result, it turned out that it is no different from the standard Tegra X1 crystal used in the Shield Android TV. This chip includes 4 Cortex A57 cores paired with 4 simpler Cortex A53 cores and GeForce GM20B Maxell graphics with 256 stream processors. nine0007

In general, many previously believed that Nintendo did not reinvent the wheel and simply used a ready-made successful NVIDIA chip without spending additional resources and funds on the development of some special version. This was also indicated by the first disassembly of the system: the chip itself, externally, and the configuration of the capacitors and other elements around it, were very similar to the updated Shield Android TV console of 2017.

NVIDIA on the blog right after the first trailer of the console said that it spent 500 man-years to create the console. But if physically the Switch processor has no differences from the standard Tegra X1 chip, then what are we talking about? NVIDIA wasn’t just talking about the chip itself: it was also about system design, software, APIs, game engines, and peripherals. Perhaps the company under the modified version of Tegra had in mind the adaptation of existing technology for a specialized console. nine0007

And in this regard, we must admit, Switch — a great achievement. Just look at the new Shield Android TV port of Tomb Raider 2013 (ported by NVIDIA’s internal Lightspeed Studios). It is far from perfect and runs at 720p with very uneven frame output. In turn, The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild achieves noticeably more impressive results at the same resolution, even at lower frequencies in mobile mode. nine0007

Unfortunately, NVIDIA’s categorical statements last year that the Switch chip is based on the same architecture as the most productive video cards (at that time they were already Pascal generation accelerators) turned out to be wrong. They then led many journalists to the idea that the Switch is based not on the relatively old Tegra X1 chip, but on the more recent and powerful Tegra X2. By and large, the difference between Pascal and Maxwell is in a thinner manufacturing process: 16 nm versus 20 nm.

2023 © All rights reserved