Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/turion-64-x2-tl-60-vs-athlon-x2-l310%23item-vote
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
12400F
vs
Core i5
13400F
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 vs AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 and AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 vs 3 June 2008 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 800 vs 722
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 707 vs 617
- 6x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 991 vs 165
- 6.
1x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1806 vs 295
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 800 vs 722 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 707 vs 617 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 991 vs 165 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1806 vs 295 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
CPU 2: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 | AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 722 | 800 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 617 | 707 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 165 | 991 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 295 | 1806 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 | AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Lion | Puma |
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 | 3 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 2868 | 2157 |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | 2x AMD Turion Ultra |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 1 GHz |
2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | S1 | S1g2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
| PowerNow | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 with others
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-64
vs
AMD
Turion 64 MT-37
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-64
vs
Intel
Core 2 Duo T9500
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-64
vs
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-62
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-64
vs
AMD
Z-01
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-64
vs
Intel
Atom C2358
AMD
Athlon X2 QL-64
vs
Intel
Celeron 807UE
AMD Athlon vs AMD Turion: Difference & Comparison
Today, several electronic devices help us humans perform various tasks.
Tasks that are complex or require many procedures when performed physically can be completed with an extremely simple method using multiple electronic devices such as computers, laptops, calculators, mobile phones, etc.
IT quiz
Check their knowledge of topics related to technology
1 / 10
The machine becomes sentient as soon as they are
trained
started
installed
turned off
2 / 10
Which of the following is defined as an attempt to steal, spy on, damage or destroy computer systems, networks or related information?
Cyber attack
Computer security
Cryptography
Digital hacking
3 / 10
Geostationary satellite rotates at —
Any height
Fixed height
Height above the pole
Height that depends on its mass
4 / 10
Which of the following semiconductors is mainly used to create electronic circuits?
silicon
germanium
selenium
tin plating
5 / 10
Which of the following domains does the AI try to extract information from spoken and written words using algorithms?
Neural network
Computer vision
Data science
Natural language processing
6 / 10
Systems for people with disabilities are an example
Face recognition 900 03
Content based image search
Smart interactions
Perception environment
7 / 10
Which of the following is not a social network?
YouTube
These are all social media platforms.
8 / 10
What does AM mean?
Angelo Marconi
Annual median
Amplitude modulation
Amps
9 / 10
What is base octal?
2
10
8
16
10 / 10
The output printed by the computer through the printer on paper is called
Virtual copy
Hard copy
Electronic copy
None of the above
your account
Computers alone have been proven to help people in many areas. However, there are different parts that make a computer system complete, and each part has a different function. The microprocessor in a computer is also known as the brain of the computer. Many companies make microprocessors and one of them is AMD or Advanced Micro Devices. Two products from this company: 1. AMD Athlon and 2. AMD Turion.
Highlights
- AMD Athlon processors are budget options for everyday computing, while AMD Turion processors are designed for the mobile market with a focus on power efficiency and performance.
- Turion processors feature advanced power-saving technologies to extend notebook battery life, while Athlon processors prioritize economy.
- Both processor lines provide sufficient performance for their target markets, but Turion processors are more suitable for portable devices due to lower power consumption and heat dissipation.
AMD Athlon vs. AMD Turion
The difference between AMD Athlon and AMD Turion is both in microprocessor battery and machine life. The AMD Athlon has a shorter battery life as well as a shorter machine run time. On the other hand, the AMD Turion had longer battery life as well as more machine uptime.
AMD Athlon is a microprocessor manufactured by the American company Advanced Micro Devices. The product was released on June 23, 1999. The first processor was built in the early 1990s and it was the result of the K7 processors we were making at the time. Even though the product was released on June 23, 1999, it became available to people by August 1999.
AMD Turion is a microprocessor manufactured by Advanced Micro Devices. In this variant, the company released several more products. These variants include Turion 64, Turion 64 X2, Turion X2 Ultra, etc. Each of these variants has different upgraded features.
Comparison table
| Comparison parameters | AMD Athlon | AMD Turion |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Low | High |
| Energy Consumption | High | Low |
| Cache | The L2 cache size is 256 KB/core. | L2 cache size is 512 KB/core. |
| Energy | Energy not stored. | More energy is saved. |
| Battery Life | Low | High |
What is AMD Athlon?
AMD Athlon is a microprocessor manufactured by AMD or Advanced Micro Devices.
The Athlon was the first processor to achieve gigahertz speeds.
The word «athlon» comes from an ancient Greek word that literally means a contest or a reward for a contest.
There are several generations of Athlon microprocessors. Each variant of the respective generation had different features and upgrades.
The second generation of the AMD Athlon series was called the Athlon Thunderbird and was released on June 4, 2000. It was also known as «T-Bird». In total, it had 37 million transistors.
The third generation is called the Athlon XP. It was released on October 9, 2001. There were six variants of this generation. Each option had different characteristics.
Cache size and instructions changed accordingly. Athlon 64 was released in 2005.
It was part of the fourth generation of the Athlon series.
There are several advantages to using an AMD Athlon. It can be used to work with spreadsheets, browse the web, email, and even word processing.
It can also run multiple applications at the same time and use many multimedia features such as video and audio. You can also play games online with a high-speed Internet connection or Wi-Fi.
What is AMD Turion?
AMD Turion is also a microprocessor. Several variants of this microprocessor were released.
The company has added a new feature to this microprocessor that consumes less power. RAM up to 1 terabyte. It also comes with the best battery and machine life.
Turion 64 is one of the variants of the Turion series. A socket from Advanced Micro Devices called «socket 754» is where it connects.
It is equipped with L2 cache. The Turion 64 X2 is also a variant that uses DDR2 memory and an S1 socket.
It comes with additional features related to the energy saving of the device.
Advanced Micro Devices also made processors that were built and packaged for mobile devices only. Turion X2 Ultra was a processor belonging to this category.
This processor had a Dual Core, and its thermal power was also calculated differently. This processor could switch between different frequencies ranging from one to eight in a fraction of a second.
The chips used in the AMD Turion consume less power and thus save power. These chips also provide clock speed reduction.
These microprocessors also use hypertransport technology, which is used to connect various peripherals and computers. Because of this, AMD Turion has higher bandwidth.
Main differences between AMD Athlon and AMD Turion
- AMD Athlon has lower bandwidth. On the other hand, AMD Turion has higher bandwidth.
- AMD Athlon has better clock speed than AMD Turion clock speed.
- AMD Athlon clock speed ranges from 1.8-2.8 GHz. On the other hand, AMD Turion’s clock speed fluctuates between 1.46-2.4 GHz.
- AMD Athlon consumes more power. On the other hand, AMD Turion consumes less power.
- AMD Athlon is cheaper than AMD Turion.
- AMD Turion life is better than AMD Athlon life.
- AMD Turion battery life is better than AMD Athlon battery life.
- AMD Turion cache size is larger than AMD Athlon cache size.
- AMD Athlon was released before AMD Turion.
Recommendations
- https://www.ece.uvic.ca/~amiralib/courses/AMD.pdf
- https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=e0SoBQAAQBAJ&oi =fnd&pg=PP1&dq=advanced+micro+devices+microprocessor&ots=g1F1xTiUD5&sig=UtQj7TP7-e_FcaOr-b_T0SBbwKE
Single request?
I put so much effort into writing this blog post to provide you with value. It will be very helpful for me if you consider sharing it on social networks or with your friends/family. SHARE ♥️
Sandeep Bhandari
Sandeep Bhandari holds a BS in Computer Science from Thapar University (2006). He has 20 years of experience in technology. He has a keen interest in various technical fields, including database systems, computer networks and programming.
You can read more about him on his bio page.
Compare AMD Athlon II P360 vs AMD Turion II P5200134
| AMD Athlon II P360 | AMD Turion II P520 |
|---|---|
| Both processors from amd | |
| Two processors were produced based on common Champlain architecture | |
| Both models belong to the mobile segment | |
| Both models work on Socket S1 9 socket0174 | |
| The processors are similar in terms of the number of cores: 2 cores | |
| Both models have 2 threads | |
| equals 2300 MHz | |
| The technical process of these processors is 45 nanometers | |
| Both models have the same number of transistors: 234 million | |
| CPU heat dissipation reaches 25 watts | |
| The number of channels for working with RAM for both processors is 2 | |
| Two processors support 64-bit instruction sets first 256 Kb | |
| AMD Athlon II P360 | AMD Turion II P520 |
|---|---|
| Athlon II P360 belongs to the Athlon | Turion II P520 belongs to the Turion 9 processor family0174 |
| Athlon II P360 belongs to the Athlon II processor line | Turion II P520 belongs to the Turion II processor line |
AMD Ath FSB data lon II P360 — 1600 MHz 16-bit HyperTransport (3. 2 GT/ s) |
FSB data AMD Turion II P520 — 1800 MHz 16-bit HyperTransport (3.6 GT/s) |
| KB | The Turion II P520 has a much larger L2 cache compared to the Athlon II P360 and is equal to 2048 KB |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Athlon II P360 | AMD Turion II P520 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerNow! | «PowerNow!» idle frequency reduction technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Athlon II P360 | AMD Turion II P520 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. |
||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | ||
| SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension. | ||
| AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. | ||
| 3DNow! | Optional MMX extension for AMD processors. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Athlon II P360 | AMD Turion II P520 | Brief description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | Improved virus protection. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Athlon II P360 | AMD Turion II P520 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD-V | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating can be calculated according to the formula, taking into account all the data: test results for all programs, socket, clock speed, year of manufacture, number of cores, threads, architecture, temperature conditions, instructions, auto-overclocking technologies , and other indicators. The results of the overall rating showed that the Turion II P520 processor is not much superior to its rival Athlon II P360. The Athlon II P360 processor itself was able to score 996.53 points, slightly behind the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
Almost all of our processors have passed PassMark tests.
Perhaps the most popular benchmark tester on the Internet. The benchmark has a large pool of tools for a comprehensive assessment of the performance of a personal computer, in particular the CPU. Among them are extended instruction checking, floating point calculations, integer calculations, game physics calculations, compression, encryption, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. In particular, you can compare data with other configurations in the database. Performance Test showed a slightly higher performance of the Turion II P520 processor (790 points) over the Athlon II P360 (711 points). The Athlon II P360 falls slightly behind in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
This benchmark for testing processors and video cards is already very outdated by now. The Single-Thread version in its test uses just one rendering thread and one core. Works on Mac OS X, Windows. It is possible to test multi-processor systems. MAXON appeared, and is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D.
The main mode of passing performance tests is working with light, imitation of global illumination, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, and procedural shaders. The ray tracing method is used. The Turion II P520 performs better in the Cinebench 10 single thread test with a score of 2047. In this test, the Athlon II P360 loses a little with a score of 1946 points.
Cinebench 10 (32bit) Multi-thread test
Multi Core version is another test option in the Cinebench R10 benchmark that uses multi-thread and multi-core testing mode. It is important to consider that the possible number of threads in this version of the program is limited to sixteen. The Turion II P520 scored 3969 in the Cinebench R10 multi-thread test, a marginal advantage over the Athlon II P360. In this test, the Athlon II P360 couldn’t win, but it wasn’t far behind either with 3728 points.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of CINEBENCH R11.
5 benchmark — which can test the full CPU, including all cores and threads. Differs from older versions, 64 threads are used here. Testing the Turion II P520 in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 1.3 points, slightly ahead of its competitor. At this time, the Athlon II P360 gets its 1.2 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the rating.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench 11.5 from the Maxon team. In testing, the ray tracing process is still used, a detailed 3D room is calculated with many glass and crystal and translucent balls. In this Single-Core variant, tests are performed using one core and one thread. His tests still have not lost their relevance. The test score is the «Frames Per Second» setting. Single-threaded testing of the Turion II P520 processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 0.56 points, it is not far ahead of the competitor. But the Athlon II P360 itself scored 0.
52 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core version Cinebench 15 — will test your system completely, showing everything it can. All CPU cores and threads are used in the process of rendering detailed 3D models. Cinebench R15 is ideal for testing new multi-threaded processors from Intel and AMD, as it can use 256 computing threads. The Turion II P520, with a score of 114.02, doesn’t win much in the multi-threaded Cinebench r15 benchmark. The Athlon II P360 is slightly behind with 105.49.points.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench 15 is the most up-to-date tester from the Finns from Maxon today. It checks the entire system: both processors and video cards. For processors, the result of the calculation will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second FPS. In the Single Core version, only one thread is used in rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many detailed objects, light sources and reflections.
The single-threaded test of the Turion II P520 processor in Cinebench R15 showed a result of 57.4 points, slightly ahead of the competitor. With a score of 53.21 on this test, the Athlon II P360 is not far behind.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is already a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is the wide device and OS support that makes Geekbench tests the most valuable at the present time. In Geekbench 4, the 64-bit multi-core Turion II P520 received a score of 2715, slightly better than the Athlon II P360. In this test, the Athlon II P360 achieves its 2440 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
For the first time, Android and iOS smartphones are also supported in this version of the benchmark. The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktop PCs. The program, like its earlier versions, can still be run on operating systems running Mac OS, Linux, Windows. The Single-Core version uses 1 thread.
The Turion II P520 scored higher in Geekbench 4’s single-thread test, with a score of 1551, but not far ahead of the competition. But the Athlon II P360 itself also showed a good score of 1400 points, slightly losing its place to the Turion II P520.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core benchmark Geekbench 3 — allows you to arrange a powerful «reliability» test of your processor and demonstrate how productive your system is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Single Core version of the benchmark loads only one processor core and one thread. The Geekbench multi-platform benchmark is usually used to evaluate the system under Mac, although it can work on both Windows and Linux. The basic purpose is to test the performance of the CPU.
Geekbench 2
A seriously outdated version of the Geekbench 2 benchmark. We have up to two hundred processor models in our archive that have test results in this program.
Today there are more recent updates: fifth and 4v.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The number of frames processed per second is an indicator of the check. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it renders at the same rate. This is the most suitable test for multi-core and multi-thread processors. The processing speed of MPEG 4 video in the Turion II P520 is slightly higher than in the Athlon II P360, and amounted to 31.69FPS The Athlon II P360 achieved 29.36 FPS, slightly behind the first processor.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. It is important to be aware that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in many video programs. The output is a better quality video file. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but encoding is already happening at a variable rate.
The final result is also determined by frames per second. Therefore, the results of the checks really reflect the effectiveness of the platform. During the encoding of the video file by the Turion II P520 processor into the mpeg4 format, a processing speed of 7.15 Frames / s was obtained. While the Athlon II P360 is slightly behind with 6.65 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
CPUs are tested in two ways : AI does pathfinding and another test simulates the system using PhysX. Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the video system, and CPU. Built using the DirectX API by Futuremark. This test is often used by overclockers and overclockers and gamers. Turion II P520 showed itself a little faster in tests for game physics, pathfinding, while gaining up to 1863 points. The Athlon II P360 also coped with these tasks, showing a good result 1797 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
We can say that about two hundred CPUs on our Internet resource have data on 3DMark Fire Strike Physics tests.