Vega 5700: AMD RX 5700 vs Vega-64

Early AMD 5700 and 5700 XT benchmarks on par with Vega 64 and Radeon VII

The release of AMD’s new flagship graphics cards, the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT, has been met with a flood of media.

Hardware-centered YouTube channels, news sites, and Reddit communities have resparked the ever-ongoing conversation of comparing one new piece of hardware to what was already on the market. As reviewers and consumers have gotten their hands on the first GPUs available, which sold out on Newegg by the end of the first day of availability (restocking is ongoing!), the evaluations started.

How do the new 5700 and 5700 XT hold up to the competition, how do they handle today’s best games, and how do they stack up against AMD’s former “enthusiast” cards, the Radeon VII and Vega 64?

Right now, as it’s only been a few days, it would be too early to compare it to the competition, being Nvidia in this case. Why? Well, within the first couple of weeks after any major hardware release, there are too many asterisks and what-ifs involved that accompany new releases, such as BIOS updates, driver updates, bugs, and more. After reviewers have had the GPUs for a couple weeks, those are the most accurate benchmarks to compare against one another.

For now, though, we’ll use PCGamer’s early benchmarks just to see how well the new cards handle the best games on the market right now, as well as how they stack up against AMD’s former best-in-class Vega 64 and Radeon VII cards.

Best games for the 5700 and 5700 XT

Each and every time a new graphics card comes out, and each and every time benchmarks are then reviewed, we’re all collectively reminded that choice of game matters just as much (sometimes even more than) the GPU you’re using.

For instance, AMD’s new RX 5700 XT handles one game, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, super well, almost matching Nvidia’s RTX Titan in FPS. On the other hand, it performs much, much worse with Total War: Warhammer 2, getting trumped by Nvidia’s original 2060, let alone the 2060 SUPER. This may change with BIOS or driver updates, but this is usually the case with any GPU—some games were built with that card’s architecture in mind, and others aren’t.

That being said, we’ve compiled a list of some of the 5700 XT and 5700’s best-performing games, using 1080p at Ultra settings as the standard.

1. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

The 5700 XT performs significantly well in Ubisoft’s last Assassin’s Creed title, nailing an average of 69 fps at ultra settings, and that’s a darn good-looking game.

2. Far Cry 5

The XT performs really well in this title, too, but the regular 5700 really shines, nearly matching its XT counterpart, only falling short in average fps by four, at a 126 to 122 average fps comparison.

3. Shadow of the Tomb Raider

The 5700 XT and 5700 are some of the best-performing cards for this title, both surpassing 110 fps at ultra settings, but the XT is still significantly better than the standard 5700 on this one.

4. The Division 2

The Division 2 is an incredibly well-rounded game, as early benchmarks seem to show competitive results across both AMD and Nvidia, which means the results for both are fair. The 5700 competes as a top-tier card, falling short behind the obvious Titan and 2080 variants for Nvidia.

5. Forza Horizon 4

It’s easy to tell that this Forza title was made with AMD in mind, as the Radeon VII, Vega 64, and 5700 XT blow almost every other card away as the best performers by a significant margin.

AMD’s old guard, the Vega 64 and Radeon VII, are easy to compare against with the new 5700 and 5700 XT cards. It’s strange to call the Radeon VII old at all, as it just came out in February, but still, as it was touted as AMD’s “enthusiast” card, comparing the new cards to it almost seems necessary.

For starters, let’s compare prices. AMD’s top-of-the-line Radeon VII still sits close to $700, depending on the manufacturer, and the Vega 64 varies a bit more wildly, typically sitting near $400 for certain sellers despite its age. The prices of the new 5700 cards are, as you’d expect from AMD, much less. The flagship 5700 XT sits at $400, and the 5700 costs $350. With the XT being $300 less than the Radeon VII, you’d expect a massive leap in performance, but that’s not the case, at least with gaming.

In fact, the 5700 XT, despite how much less it costs compared to the Radeon VII, just barely (and we mean barely) misses the Radeon VII’s average fps in PCGamer’s 11-game test. We’re talking an fps difference of three. Across all 11 games, the $700 Radeon VII clicks in at 114 average fps, and the $400 5700 XT’s average is 111 fps at 1080p Ultra settings. The differences at 1440p Ultra and 4K are just as negligible.

The regular 5700 has a similar difference to the Vega 64, but on the other side of the spectrum. The 5700, at all of PCGamer’s tested resolutions and graphical demands, actually performs a bit better than the Vega 64, despite it costing less than the 64. Sure, graphics cards can do more than just play games, but if playing games is what you’re in the market for, there’s virtually no reason at all to pick up a Vega 64 or Radeon VII over the 5700XT or 5700, given the price difference and closeness in performance.

AMD Radeon Vega 7 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT








AMD Radeon Vega 7 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon Vega 7 on one side and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 448 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2560 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,9 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

AMD Radeon Vega 7

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q1 2020

Q3 2019
Model number

215-0917210, Navi 10 XT
GPU name

Raven

Navi 10
Architecture

GCN 5. 0

RDNA 1.0
Generation

Vega Raved Bridge

Navi RX 5000
Lithography

7 nm

7 nm
Transistors

9.800.000.000

10.300.000.000
Bus interface

IGP

PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock

400 MHz

1,61 GHz
GPU boost clock

1,60 GHz

1,91 GHz
TDP

15 W

225 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

7

40
Shading units

448

2. 560
TMUs

28

160
ROPs

8

64
Cache memory

4 MB
Pixel fillrate

12,8 GP/s

121,9 GP/s
Texture fillrate

44,8 GT/s

304,8 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)

2,9 TFLOPS

19,5 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)

1,4 TFLOPS

9,8 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

89,6 GFLOPS

609,6 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

9.754
AMD Radeon Vega 7

1.434

The difference is 580%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Processors with the graphics card AMD Radeon Vega 7:

AMD Ryzen 5 4600GAMD Ryzen 5 5600GAMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAMD Ryzen 5 5625CAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GEAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GEAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650UAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon Vega 7 Nvidia equivalentAMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Nvidia equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs MSI Radeon RX 5700

: What is the difference?

43 BALLLA

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

56 Ballla

MSI Radeon RX 5700

Winter when comparing

VS

54 Facts compared to

AMD Radeon RX VEGA 56 9000

000 MSI RXI RXI RXI RADEN Is Radeon RX Vega 56 better than MSI Radeon RX 5700?

  • 2. 55 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
    10.5 TFLOPS vs 7.95 TFLOPS
  • 81.1 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
    329.5 GTexels/s vs 248.4 GTexels/s
  • 1792bit wider memory bus?
    2048bit vs 256bit
  • 1280 more stream processors?
    3584 vs 2304
  • 2200million more transistors?
    12500 million vs 10300 million
  • 80 more texture units (TMUs)?
    224 vs 144

  • GPU frequency 309MHz higher?
    1465MHz vs 1156MHz
  • 16.26 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    110.4 GPixel/s vs 94.14 GPixel/s
  • 30W below TDP?
    180W vs 210W
  • 950MHz faster memory speed?
    1750MHz vs 800MHz
  • 12400MHz higher effective clock frequency?
    14000MHz vs 1600MHz
  • 38GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    448GB/s vs 410GB/s
  • 254MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1725MHz vs 1471MHz
  • Semiconductor size 7nm smaller?
    7nm vs 14nm

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

MSI Radeon RX 5700

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

MSI Radeon RX 5700

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

NVIDIA NVIDIA NVIDIA NVIDI0003

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

Gigabyte Radeon RX 6600 XT Eagle

MSI Radeon RX 5700

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

MSI Radeon RX 5700

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT Mech 2X

MSI Radeon RX 5700

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

MSI Radeon RX 5700

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

MSI Radeon RX 5700

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

MSI Radeon RX 5700

vs

Asus Phoenix GeForce GT 1030 OC Edition 9Ol000 Performance

10. 0 /10

1 votes

No reviews yet

Quiet operation

4.0 900 2560003

reviews yet there is no

Reliability

8.0 /10

1 Votes

Reviews yet there are no

Custom

CLECTION FECTION GP

1156MHZ

1465MHz

graphic processor (GPU) higher clock frequency.

turbo GPU

1471MHz

1725MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

pixel rate

94.14 GPixel/s

110.4 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

FLOPS

10.5 TFLOPS

7.95 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

texture size

329. 5 GTexels/s

248.4 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

GPU memory speed

800MHz

1750MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

Shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

texture units (TMUs)

TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

effective memory speed

1600MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

maximum memory bandwidth

410GB/s

448GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

memory bus width

2048bit

256bit

Wider memory bus — this means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

GDDR memory version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 56)

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

✖MSI Radeon RX 5700

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Features

DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

OpenGL version

The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.

version of OpenCL

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

✔MSI Radeon RX 5700

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 56)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

✖MSI Radeon RX 5700

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

✔MSI Radeon RX 5700

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

✖MSI Radeon RX 5700

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 56)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (MSI Radeon RX 5700)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

✔MSI Radeon RX 5700

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

Newer HDMI versions support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Which graphics cards are better?

Comparison of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) , CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

versus

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

  • Newer graphics card, release date difference 3 year(s) 1 month(s)
  • 11% more: 1499 MHz vs 1350 MHz

  • 693.9x more texturing speed: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process for the graphics card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 7 nm vs 14 nm
  • About 92% less power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • About 5% more performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 830 vs 791
  • About 23% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) more: 16433 vs 13339
  • GFXBench 4.0 performance — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 23% more: 16433 vs 13339
Release date 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 June 2017
Boost core clock 1499 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Texturing speed 239. 8 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel/s
Process 7nm vs 14nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
PassMark — G2D Mark 830 vs 791
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16433 vs 13339
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16433 vs 13339
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3712 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3712 vs 3709

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

  • About 1% more core clock: 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz
  • 60% more shader processors: 4096 vs 2560
  • 5% more memory clock: 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • About 1% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 126292 vs 126292
  • Geekbench — OpenCL performance about 29% better: 69055 vs 53335
Core clock 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Number of shaders 4096 vs 2560
Memory frequency 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
PassMark — G3D Mark 12689 vs 12622
Geekbench — OpenCL 69055 vs 53335

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

PassMark — G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
PassMark — G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5700XT AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark — G2D Mark 830 791
PassMark — G3D Mark 12622 12689
Geekbench — OpenCL 53335 69055
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16433 13339
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16433 13339
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3712 3709
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3712 3709
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3353
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 142. 691
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1729.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 111.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1396.172

Feature comparison

conveyors

AMD Radeon Pro 5700XT AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Architecture RDNA 1. 0 GCN 5.0
Codename Navi 10 Vega 10
Issue date 4 Aug 2020 27 June 2017
Place in the rating 104 123
Type Laptop Workstation
Boost core clock 1499 MHz 1350 MHz
Number of Compute 40
Core frequency 1243MHz 1250 MHz
Process 7nm 14nm
Maximum temperature 479. 7GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.35TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.675 TFLOPS
Number of shaders 2560 4096
Pixel fill rate 95.94 GPixel/s
Texturing speed 239.8 GTexel/s 345.6 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 250 Watt
Number of transistors 10300 million 12,500 million
Floating point performance 11. 059 gflops
Video connectors No outputs No outputs
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended power supply 350 Watt
Additional power connectors None None
Width IGP
Length 267mm
DirectX 12.1 12.

2023 © All rights reserved