AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 13877 vs 7413
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 465.116
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 2.796
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 29.115
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 54.932
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 2780
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 1884
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 2780
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 1884
| Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 13877 vs 7413 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
668.308 vs 465.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 2.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 29.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 54.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
4093 vs 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 35.283
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 35.283 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 13877 | 7413 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
35.283 | 37.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 465.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 2.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 29.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 54.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 2780 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2350 | 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3343 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1765 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | GCN 4. 0 |
Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 866 | 916 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x8 |
PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / DDR4 |
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops.
The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
log 24. 13:59:34
#0 checking url part for id 10397 +0s … 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8892 +0s … 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10669 +0s … 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:27:05 +0200 +0s … 0s
#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.098s … 0.098s
#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.098s
#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.098s
#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.098s
#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.098s
#10 composed specs +0s … 0.098s
#11 did output specs +0s … 0.099s
#12 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.099s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10397 +0.048s … 0.147s
#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.148s
#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s
#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.149s
#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s … 0.154s
#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.154s
#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s … 0.168s
#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.172s
#21 got single benchmarks 10397 +0.015s … 0.187s
#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 8892 +0s .
.. 0.187s
#23 got single benchmarks 8892 +0.005s … 0.192s
#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 10669 +0s … 0.192s
#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s
#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.193s
#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.193s
#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.195s
#29 got single benchmarks 10669 +0.007s … 0.202s
#30 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.202s
#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.202s
#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.204s
#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s
#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s
#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s
#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s
#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.204s
#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.204s
#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s
#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.204s
#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.205s
#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.205s
#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.205s
#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s .
.. 0.206s
#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s
#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s
#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.206s
#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.206s
#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s
#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s
#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s .
.. 0.207s
#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s
#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s
#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.207s
#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s
#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.207s
#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s
#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s
#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.208s
#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s
#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.208s
#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.209s
#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.21s
#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s
#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.21s
#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.21s
#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s
#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s
#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s
#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s
#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s
#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s
#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s
#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.211s
#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.211s
#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s
#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s
#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.211s
#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s
#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.212s
#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s
#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.212s
#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s
#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.212s
#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s
#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s
#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.212s
#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s
#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s .
.. 0.213s
#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.213s
#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.214s
#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.214s
#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s
#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s
#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.215s
#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.216s
#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.216s
#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ..
. 0.216s
#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s
#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.217s
#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s
#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s
#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.217s
#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s
#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s
#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s
#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s
#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s
#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.219s
#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.219s
#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.219s
#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s
#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s
#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s
#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s
#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.221s
#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.222s
#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.223s
#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s
#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s
#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s
#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s
#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.223s
#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s
#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.
021s … 0.245s
#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s … 0.252s
#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.252s
#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.252s
#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.252s
#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s … 0.261s
#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.265s
#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s
#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s
#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s
#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s … 0.274s
#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.279s
#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s
#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s
#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.279s
#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s
#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s
#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s
#174 min, max, avg, median took s +0s … 0.28s
#175 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.28s
#176 Got 396 rows for game benchmarks. +0.027s … 0.307s
#177 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.307s
#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.307s
#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.307s
#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.307s
#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.307s
#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.307s
#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.308s
#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.308s
#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .
.. 0.308s
#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.308s
#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.308s
#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#243 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s
#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.309s
#256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#266 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.309s
#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#277 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.309s
#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#297 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.309s
#298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#300 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#301 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#302 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#306 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#307 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#309 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s
#310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.31s
#312 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#317 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#320 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#323 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#325 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#326 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.31s
#327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#328 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#331 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#336 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.31s
#342 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#343 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#344 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#345 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#347 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#351 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.31s
#357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#359 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#367 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#368 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#370 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.31s
#372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#374 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s
#375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#379 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#381 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.311s
#386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#389 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#390 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.311s
#400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#404 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#410 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#413 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.311s
#414 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#415 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#416 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#422 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#425 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#427 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.311s
#428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#436 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#437 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#440 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#441 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.311s
#442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#444 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#448 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#450 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.311s
#456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#457 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#459 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#460 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.311s
#470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.311s
#479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#480 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.312s
#484 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#487 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.312s
#490 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s … 0.313s
#491 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.314s
#492 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.314s
#493 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.314s
#494 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.315s
#495 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.315s
#496 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.315s
#497 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.315s
#498 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0. 001s … 0.316s
#499 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.316s
#500 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.317s
#501 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.317s
#502 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.317s
#503 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.317s
#504 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.317s
#505 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.318s
#506 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.318s
#507 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.319s
#508 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.319s
#509 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.319s
#510 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.319s
#511 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.319s
#512 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.319s
#513 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.32s
#514 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.32s
#515 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.321s
#516 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.321s
#517 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.321s
#518 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.321s
#519 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.321s
#520 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.321s
#521 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.321s
#522 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.321s
#523 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.322s
#524 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.322s
#525 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.322s
#526 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.322s
#527 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.322s
#528 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.322s
#529 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.322s
#530 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.322s
#531 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.323s
#532 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.323s
#533 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.323s
#534 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.324s
#535 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.324s
#536 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.324s
#537 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.324s
#538 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.324s
#539 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.324s
#540 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.324s
#541 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.324s
#542 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.325s
#543 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.325s
#544 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.325s
#545 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.325s
#546 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.326s
#547 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.326s
#548 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.326s
#549 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.326s
#550 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.326s
#551 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.326s
#552 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.326s
#553 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.326s
#554 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.326s
#555 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#556 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#557 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#558 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#559 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#560 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#561 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#562 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0. 001s … 0.327s
#563 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#564 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#565 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#566 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#567 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#568 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.327s
#569 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.328s
#570 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.328s
#571 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.328s
#572 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.328s
#573 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.328s
#574 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.328s
#575 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.329s
#576 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.329s
#577 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.329s
#578 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.329s
#579 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.329s
#580 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.33s
#581 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.33s
#582 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.331s
#583 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.331s
#584 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.331s
#585 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.331s
#586 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.332s
#587 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.332s
#588 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.332s
#589 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.332s
#590 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.332s
#591 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.332s
#592 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.332s
#593 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.332s
#594 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.332s
#595 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.333s
#596 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.333s
#597 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.333s
#598 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.333s
#599 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.333s
#600 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.334s
#601 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.334s
#602 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.334s
#603 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.334s
#604 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.334s
#605 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.335s
#606 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.335s
#607 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.335s
#608 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.335s
#609 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.335s
#610 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0. 001s … 0.335s
#611 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.335s
#612 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.335s
#613 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.335s
#614 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.336s
#615 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.336s
#616 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.336s
#617 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.336s
#618 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.336s
#619 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.337s
#620 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.337s
#621 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.337s
#622 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.337s
#623 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.337s
#624 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.337s
#625 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.337s
#626 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.337s
#627 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.338s
#628 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.338s
#629 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.339s
#630 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.339s
#631 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.339s
#632 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.339s
#633 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.339s
#634 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.339s
#635 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.34s
#636 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.34s
#637 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.34s
#638 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.34s
#639 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.34s
#640 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.34s
#641 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.341s
#642 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.341s
#643 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.341s
#644 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.341s
#645 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.341s
#646 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.341s
#647 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.342s
#648 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.342s
#649 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.342s
#650 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.342s
#651 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.343s
#652 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#653 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.343s
#654 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#655 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#656 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#657 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#658 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.343s
#659 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#660 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#661 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#662 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.343s
#663 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.344s
#664 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.344s
#665 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.345s
#666 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.345s
#667 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.345s
#668 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.345s
#669 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.345s
#670 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.346s
#671 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.346s
#672 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.346s
#673 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.346s
#674 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.346s
#675 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.346s
#676 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.346s
#677 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.347s
#678 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.347s
#679 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.347s
#680 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.348s
#681 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.348s
#682 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.348s
#683 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.349s
#684 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.349s
#685 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s … 0.351s
#686 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.351s
#687 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.353s
#688 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.353s
#689 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.353s
#690 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.353s
#691 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.353s
#692 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.354s
#693 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.354s
#694 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.354s
#695 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.354s
#696 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.354s
#697 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.355s
#698 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.355s
#699 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.355s
#700 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.355s
#701 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.357s
#702 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.359s
#703 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s … 0.362s
#704 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.365s
#705 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0. 003s … 0.368s
#706 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.369s
#707 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.37s
#708 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.371s
#709 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.372s
#710 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s … 0.374s
#711 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.374s
#712 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.375s
#713 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.377s
#714 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.378s
#715 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.379s
#716 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.379s
#717 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.38s
#718 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.382s
#719 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.382s
#720 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.382s
#721 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.382s
#722 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.382s
#723 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.383s
#724 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.383s
#725 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.383s
#726 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.383s
#727 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.383s
#728 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.383s
#729 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.384s
#730 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.384s
#731 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.384s
#732 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#733 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#734 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.384s
#735 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#736 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#737 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.384s
#738 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#739 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.384s
#740 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.384s
#741 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#742 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#743 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#744 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#745 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.384s
#746 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.384s
#747 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#748 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#749 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.385s
#750 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#751 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#752 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#753 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#754 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#755 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#756 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#757 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.385s
#758 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#759 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#760 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#761 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#762 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#763 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#764 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.385s
#765 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#766 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#767 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#768 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#769 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#770 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#771 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#772 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.385s
#773 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.385s
#774 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.386s
#775 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.386s
#776 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.386s
#777 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#778 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#779 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.386s
#780 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#781 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#782 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.386s
#783 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#784 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#785 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.386s
#786 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#787 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#788 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#789 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.386s
#790 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#791 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#792 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#793 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#794 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.387s
#795 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#796 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#797 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#798 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#799 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#800 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#801 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#802 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#803 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#804 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#805 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#806 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#807 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#808 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#809 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.387s
#810 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#811 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#812 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#813 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#814 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.387s
#815 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#816 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#817 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.387s
#818 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.388s
#819 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#820 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.388s
#821 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.388s
#822 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#823 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#824 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.388s
#825 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#826 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#827 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#828 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.388s
#829 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#830 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#831 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.388s
#832 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.389s
#833 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.389s
#834 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.389s
#835 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.389s
#836 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.389s
#837 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.389s
#838 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.389s
#839 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.389s
#840 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.389s
#841 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.392s
#842 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.392s
#843 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s … 0.395s
#844 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.395s
#845 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.398s
#846 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.398s
#847 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.398s
#848 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.398s
#849 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.398s
#850 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.398s
#851 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.398s
#852 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.398s
#853 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.398s
#854 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.398s
#855 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.398s
#856 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.398s
#857 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.399s
#858 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.399s
#859 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.399s
#860 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.399s
#861 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.399s
#862 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.399s
#863 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.399s
#864 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.399s
#865 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.399s
#866 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.399s
#867 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.399s
#868 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.399s
#869 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.399s
#870 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.4s
#871 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.4s
#872 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.4s
#873 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.4s
#874 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.401s
#875 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.401s
#876 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.401s
#877 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.401s
#878 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.401s
#879 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.401s
#880 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.401s
#881 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.402s
#882 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.402s
#883 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.402s
#884 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.402s
#885 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.402s
#886 benchmarks composed for output. +0s … 0.402s
#887 calculated avg scores. +0s … 0.402s
#888 return log +0.002s … 0.404s
| AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | 166946 |
|
| AMD Radeon Navi21 | 159946 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | 159528 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | 150488 |
|
| AMD Radeon PRO W6800X | 138267 |
|
| AMD Radeon PRO W6800X Duo | 136289 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | 129800 |
|
| AMD Radeon PRO W6800 | 123872 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD 6900 XT | 121732 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD GFX10 Family Unknown Prototype | 120858 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | 100963 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | 100354 |
|
| AMD Radeon 6600XT | 96900 |
|
| Apple M1 Ultra | 94583 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro VII | 94556 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600X | 85580 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | 83409 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD AMD RX 6600 XT | 82723 |
|
| AMD AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | 78983 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700XT | 77202 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 | 75685 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700XT | 75427 |
|
| AMD Radeon 5700XT | 74647 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | 73809 |
|
| AMD Radeon PRO W6600 | 73486 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | 71572 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro WX8200 | 70759 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega56 | 69229 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | 68311 |
|
| AMD Radeon VII | 68286 |
|
| Apple M1 Max | 64708 |
|
| AMD Sapphire Redeon RX 5700XT Nitro+ 8GB | 64038 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro RX 5600XT | 63945 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | 63830 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | 61607 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | 61146 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | 60319 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro RX5700 | 60126 |
|
| AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | 59906 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | 59820 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | 59317 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD 5700 XT | 59012 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 | 58447 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | 57679 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | 57015 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | 56432 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | 56320 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | 55212 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro RX 580 | 52863 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro RX580 | 52332 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | 51845 |
|
| AMD Redeon Pro 580 | 51062 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 | 49268 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Hawaii XT Prototype | 46101 |
|
| AMD Radeon Vega | 45271 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 | 44601 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Hawaii PRO Prototype | 43232 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | 43100 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Radeon RX 580 | 42866 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 | 42415 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | 41995 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | 41982 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Hawaii Unknown Prototype | 41323 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | 41242 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 580X | 41240 |
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION | 41063 |
|
| AMD Radeon Navi10 | 40872 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | 40200 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Fiji XT Prototype | 40136 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 580 | 40080 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | 40060 |
|
| Apple M1 Pro | 39758 |
|
| AMD RadeonPro 580X | 39577 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD 5700X | 39179 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Tahiti XT Prototype | 38946 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 | 38292 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | 37399 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 575X | 37296 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 575 | 36188 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | 35023 |
|
| AMD Radeon Navi14 | 34682 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 480X | 34491 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 570X | 32285 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD — FirePro D700 | 32000 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M395X | 31808 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 570 | 30780 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Tahiti LE Prototype | 30680 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 30624 |
|
| Apple Paravirtual device | 30603 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD 7950 | 30593 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X | 30471 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | 29714 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 270X | 28112 |
|
| AMD Radeon Rro W5500X | 27973 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Pitcairn XT Prototype | 26737 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M395 | 26526 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | 26396 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Tonga XT Prototype | 26000 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Pitcairn Unknown Prototype | 25531 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Tonga PRO Prototype | 25060 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Pitcairn PRO Prototype | 24945 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M290X | 24894 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | 24857 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | 24214 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 | 23824 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD — FirePro D500 | 23398 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD — FirePro D300 | 23163 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 22180 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M390 | 21960 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M290 | 21799 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | 21201 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 | 21032 |
|
| Apple M1 GPU | 21001 |
|
| Apple M1 | 20440 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 19520 |
|
| AMD Radeon Polaris | 19360 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | 19178 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 | 18838 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 | 18801 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 560X | 18758 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | 18723 |
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 | 17920 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Saturn XT Prototype | 17504 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Emerald XT Prototype | 17314 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | 16811 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 460 | 16437 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | 16063 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Bonaire Unknown Prototype | 15985 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | 15163 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 14587 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Verde XT Prototype | 14493 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 555X | 13910 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | 13595 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD 7770 | 13536 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 | 13531 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 13527 |
|
| Apple A15 GPU | 13427 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 455 | 12897 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 555 | 12562 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 12375 |
|
| Apple A12Z GPU | 12105 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Black | 12005 |
|
| AMD Radeon R9 M370X | 11286 |
|
| Apple A12X GPU | 11235 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | 11048 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Verde PRO Prototype | 10779 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | 10616 |
|
| AMD Radeon Pro 450 | 10560 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Venus XTX Prototype | 10232 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | 9797 |
|
| Apple A14 GPU | 9425 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Plus Graphics | 8996 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Chelsea XT Prototype | 8830 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | 8773 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | 8704 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | 8636 |
|
| NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | 8035 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | 8002 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | 7870 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 7834 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 | 7823 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | 7421 |
|
| AMD Radeon HD Venus LE Prototype | 7370 |
|
| Apple A13 GPU | 7176 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | 7172 |
|
| Apple A10X GPU | 6910 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Plus Graphics 655 | 6879 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 6863 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Plus Graphics 645 | 6765 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Plus Graphics 650 | 6726 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics 6200 | 6681 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 6670 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | 6570 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Plus Graphics 640 | 6247 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics 540 | 6079 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | 5953 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | 5899 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics 550 | 5855 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | 5641 |
|
| NVIDIA GRID K2 | 5557 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | 5470 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | 5449 |
|
| Apple A12 GPU | 5378 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | 5204 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M | 5183 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 5182 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | 5069 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics 6100 | 4919 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | 4915 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | 4900 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | 4815 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | 4660 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 | 4637 |
|
| Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics 6000 | 4603 |
|
| Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630 | 4553 |
|
| Intel(R) KBL Unknown | 4459 |
|
| Intel(R) ??? Graphics 630 | 4424 |
|
| Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 | 4414 |
|
| Apple A9X GPU | 4279 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | 4274 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | 4147 |
|
| Intel(R) SKL Unknown | 4060 |
|
| Intel(R) HD Graphics Unknown | 4036 |
|
| Intel(R) HD Graphics 530 | 4018 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | 3858 |
|
| Apple A11 GPU | 3805 |
|
| Intel(R) UHD Graphics 617 | 3771 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | 3574 |
|
| Intel(R) HD Graphics 615 | 3518 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | 3189 |
|
| Intel(R) HD Graphics 515 | 3103 |
|
| Apple A10 GPU | 3065 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | 3037 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 | 2777 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 | 2716 |
|
| Intel(R) HD Graphics 5300 | 2534 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | 2466 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | 2446 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | 2407 |
|
| Apple A9 GPU | 2388 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | 2369 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | 2320 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | 2083 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | 2044 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | 2044 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | 1967 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | 1933 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | 1850 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K2000M | 1676 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | 1523 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | 1435 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | 1343 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | 1239 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K610M | 1181 |
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | 1108 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K420 | 1060 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K600 | 1060 |
|
| NVIDIA NVS 510 | 987 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | 947 |
|
| NVIDIA Quadro 410 | 804 |
|
| Apple A8X GPU | 754 |
|
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics | 478 |
|
| Apple A8 GPU | 476 |
|
| Intel Iris Graphics | 457 |
|
| Intel HD Graphics 5000 | 408 |
|
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 | 147 |
|
| Apple A7 GPU | 26 |
|
Can My Mac Run It? 100+ Mac gaming benchmarks
You probably got a Mac for reasons completely unrelated to gaming. Perhaps you needed one for work or school, or perhaps you just couldn’t stand Windows anymore.
Either way, if you’re here, you’re wondering: Can my Mac run games?
We test some of the best games on several Macs, ranging from powerful iMacs to older MacBooks, to help you figure it out.
Ever wondered if your Mac can run Fortnite, Civ 6, or WoW? This Can My Mac Run It guide is for you.
Gaming Macs, benchmarked
This first section is all about testing as many Macs as possible and comparing them with each other. That means running the exact same benchmark on every Mac.
With the help of the Mac gaming community, we benchmarked over 70 different Mac models using Unigine’s Valley benchmarking tool:
Current Lineup
If you’re interested in getting a new Mac, or just made a purchase and are curious how your new machine compares with the rest, the table below only includes modern Macs from 2018 onwards:
All Macs, benchmarked
While the table above only focuses on modern Macs, this table includes every single Mac we’ve benchmarked so far:
Want to help out? Benchmark your Mac and share your result with us! It’s easy and free. You can read this page for detailed step-by-step instructions.
Understanding these results
If you’re a little lost with all these FPS (frames per second) figures, this is how we read them:
< 20 FPS
Unplayable gaming performance: A game running below 20 FPS is unplayable (unless you’re dealing with a turn-based game and don’t mind a lot of lag).
20 – 35 FPS
Borderline gaming performance: A game running between 20 – 30 FPS is possible but it will be uncomfortable. If the game runs at 30+ FPS, you can expect decent performance.
> 35 FPS
Good gaming performance: While many hardcore gamers expect at least 60 FPS from a gaming rig, 35 FPS is more than acceptable for casual gamers.
Can I run it for Mac: The Games
The previous section was all about testing as many different Macs running the same benchmark. This section is all about testing as many different games as possible.
These are all the benchmark results we have gathered so far (you can also find the specs of the Macs used below the table). To truly get the most out of it, though, make sure you check out the “Read More” links for all the juicy details:
These are the two models used for all tests presented in this table:
- MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2013): 2.4 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB RAM, Intel Iris 5100 (1.5GB)
- MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2016): 2.0 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB RAM, Intel Iris Graphics 540 (1.5GB)
Is your Mac good for gaming?
These results are great to have but they’re only part of the answer. In order to effectively figure out what games your Mac can run, you should:
1. Download Valley and perform this same test (we explain the entire process in detail here).
➜ That result will be your reference point.
2. Look for the game you want to play from our Can my Mac Run it section.
3. From the machines used to test that game, pick the one that resembles your Mac the most.
➜ Use the results from that machine as a comparison point.
As an example, we’ve used the same 2013 13-inch MacBook Pro and 2016 13-inch MacBook Pro for every one of our Mac Performance Reviews. This is how they run some of the most popular Mac games right now:
| Game | 2013 13-inch MacBook Pro | 2016 13-inch MacBook Pro | Difference |
| Valley benchmark | 9.3 FPS | 30 FPS | +222% |
| Fortnite | 23.4 FPS | 47.1 FPS | +101% |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | 0 FPS | 16.5 FPS | ∞ |
| DiRT Rally | 38.5 FPS | 53.9 FPS | +40% |
Armed with a Valley result of your own, you can have a more accurate idea of what performance to expect from these games.
For example, if your Valley result is 45 FPS, you can expect significantly better performance than our 2016 MBP (which scored 30 FPS). If your Valley result is 20 FPS, you can expect gaming performance somewhere between our two MBPs above.
Do keep in mind that the correlation between Valley and games is not linear and will differ from game to game. This method should only be used to give you an educated guess of what to expect from games.
Can you run it: MacBook and older Mac owners, beware!
Chances are you have a Mac that isn’t particularly good for gaming, at least on paper. Namely a MacBook or any other Mac without a dedicated graphics card.
Most will tell you gaming is impossible on a MacBook but the results speak for themselves:
Demanding games will be out of your reach, that’s a fact. But slightly older games or modern indies will do just fine. To give you a better idea of what can be possible on an entry-level MacBook (in this case, my 2013 13-inch MacBook), all the games that are above the “unplayable” grey area should play fine on older Macs with integrated graphics.
Keep an eye on the MacBook and Old Mac performance section to have a better idea of whether your MacBook or older Mac will be able to do.
What if you’re looking for a new Mac?
If you’re actually looking for a new Mac to buy and gaming happens to be important for you, you should definitely check out our Best Mac for gaming guide for which we tested two real-world games on every single Mac currently on sale:
While it was easy to find the fastest Mac, and hence “best for gaming”, we actually focused on the machines that offered the most value for money. Spoiler alert, it’s the 27-inch iMac (or 15-inch MacBook Pro if you need a laptop).
Testing conditions
We went to great lengths to ensure all tests were performed under the same testing conditions (settings, resolution and, gameplay).
All of the games featured here were tested on at least our 3 in-house models below (although several other machines were tested thanks to other members of the Mac Gamer HQ team):
- iMac (5K, 27-inch, Late 2014): 3.
5 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB RAM, AMD Radeon R9 M290X (2GB)
- MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2013): 2.4 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB RAM, Intel Iris 5100 (1.5GB)
- MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2016): 2.0 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB RAM, Intel Iris Graphics 540 (1.5GB)
For all available results and details involving the machines that were used, make sure you visit our “Read more” links.
Gaming Macs Valley results
While most websites use Geekbench and Cinebench R15, we decided to go with a more specialized tool.
Geekbench is extremely popular and already benefits from a massive database of results but it only focuses on CPU performance and disregards graphics performance, which is critical for gaming.
Cinebench R15 does have a dedicated graphics performance benchmark, but it’s so old and outdated, it’s no longer relevant to modern video gaming.
Unigine’s Valley, on the other hand, mainly focuses on stress-testing graphics performance and features:
- GPU temperature and clock monitoring
- 64 000 000 square meters of extremely detailed, seamless terrain
- Procedural content generation and placement
- User-controlled dynamic weather
In an effort to keep these results as accurate as possible, we asked every contributor to use the same benchmarking tool under the same testing conditions:
- Using Unigine’s Valley basic preset.
- Closing all other open applications while running the test.
- Maintaining the machine plugged at all times (low battery affects performance).
Released in 2013, Valley is slightly old and it’s also a shame it still relies on OpenGL, but after testing several other tools, Valley offers the closest testing conditions to modern games.
Want to help out? Benchmark your Mac and share your result with us! It’s easy and and should take less than 10 minutes! You can read this page for detailed step-by-step instructions.
Your Turn
With that, we hope you now have a better idea of what your Mac is capable of.
Granted, Macs aren’t designed with gaming in mind, but that doesn’t mean they can’t still do a great job! As we continue doing performance reviews and Best of guides, we’ll continue to add all of our results here. This is a page you might want to bookmark
Would you like us to test a particular game or Mac model? Let us know in the comments section. If enough people ask for a game, we will be forced to test it!
| 38 | ~Xbone X | AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) |
| 48 | ~PS4 Pro | AMD Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) |
| 61 | 2018 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | Vega 20 |
| 80 | 2018 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | Vega 16 |
| 89 | 2015 5K iMac | AMD Radeon R9 M395 (GCN) |
| 109 | 2014 5K iMac | AMD Radeon R9 M290X (GCN) |
| 118 | 2015 5K iMac | AMD Radeon R9 M390 (GCN) |
| 121 | 2018 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | AMD Radeon Pro 560X (Polaris) |
| 122 | 2017 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | AMD Radeon Pro 560 (Polaris) |
| 123 | 2016 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | AMD Radeon Pro 460 (Polaris) |
| 123 | 2017 4K iMac | AMD Radeon Pro 460 (Polaris) |
| 127 | ~Xbone / PS4 | AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop) |
| 132 | 2018 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | AMD Radeon Pro 555X (Polaris) |
| 133 | 2017 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | AMD Radeon Pro 555 (Polaris) |
| 133 | 2017 4K iMac | AMD Radeon Pro 555 (Polaris) |
| 134 | 2016 15″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | AMD Radeon Pro 455 (Polaris) |
| 137 | not used in Apple devices | MX150 |
| 160* | not used in Apple devices | Vega 11 |
| 172* | not used in Apple devices | Vega 10 |
| 181* | 2015 5K iMac | AMD Radeon R9 M380 (GCN) |
| 192 | 2015 15″ MacBook Pro | AMD Radeon R9 M370X (GCN 1. |
| 230 | 2013 1080p iMac | nVidia GeForce GT 750M (Kepler) |
| 230 | 2013-2014 15″ MacBook Pro | nVidia GeForce GT 750M (Kepler) |
| 231 | 2015 1080p iMac | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (Broadwell) |
| 231 | 2015 4K iMac | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (Broadwell) |
| 236 | not used in Apple devices | Vega 8 |
| 239* | 2018 iPad Pro | Apple A12X Bionic GPU |
| 243 | 2018 13″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (Kaby Lake) |
| 247 | 2012-2013 15″ MacBook Pro | nVidia GeForce GT 650M (Kepler) |
| 256 | 2013-2015 13″ & 15″ MacBook Pro | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (Haswell) |
| 256 | 2013 1080p iMac | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (Haswell) |
| 259 | 2017 13″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (Kaby Lake) |
| 261 | 2016 13″ MacBook Pro w/ TouchBar | Intel Iris Graphics 550 (Skylake) |
| 265 | 2017 13″ MacBook Pro Escape | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Kaby Lake) |
| 265 | 2017 1080p iMac | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Kaby Lake) |
| 267 | 2016 13″ MacBook Pro Escape | Intel Iris Graphics 540 (Skylake) |
| 268* | 2017 iPhone XR / XS / XS Max | Apple A12 Bionic GPU |
| 269* | 2017 iPhone 8 / 8+ / X | Apple A11 Bionic GPU |
| 270* | 2017 iPad Pro | Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR |
| 270* | Apple TV 4K | Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR |
| 306 | 2015 iPad Pro | Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT |
| 323* | not used in Apple devices | Vega 6 |
| 329 | ~Nintendo Switch | nVidia Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU |
| 331 | not used in Apple devices | Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake-R) |
| 348 | 2011 15″ & 17″ MacBook Pro | AMD Radeon HD 6770M (Terascale 2) |
| 373 | 2011 15″ & 17″ MacBook Pro | AMD Radeon HD 6750M (Terascale 2) |
| 405* | not used in Apple devices | Vega 3 |
| 407 | 2015 13″ MacBook Pro | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 |
| 416 | 2016 iPhone 7 / 7+ | Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR |
| 421 | 2015-2017 MacBook Air | Intel HD Graphics 6000 (Broadwell) |
| 421 | 2015 1080p iMac | Intel HD Graphics 6000 (Broadwell) |
| 424 | 2014 Mac mini | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 (Haswell) |
| 439* | 2018 MacBook Air | Intel UHD Graphics 617 (Amber Lake) |
| 440* | 2017 MacBook | Intel UHD Graphics 615 (Amber Lake) |
| 450 | 2013-2014 MacBook Air | Intel HD Graphics 5000 (Haswell) |
| 450 | 2014 Mac mini | Intel HD Graphics 5000 (Haswell) |
| 450 | 2014 1080p iMac | Intel HD Graphics 5000 (Haswell) |
| 457 | 2011 Mac mini | AMD Radeon HD 6630M (Terascale 2) |
| 480 | 2015 iPhone 6s / 6s+ | Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600 |
| 482 | 2016 MacBook | Intel UHD Graphics 515 (Skylake) |
| 509 | 2010 15″ & 17″ MacBook Pro | nVidia GeForce GT 330M (GT2xx) |
| 514 | 2015 MacBook | Intel HD Graphics 5300 (Broadwell) |
| 525 | 2012-2013 MacBook Air | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge) |
| 525 | 2012 Mac mini | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge) |
| 525 | 2012 13″ MacBook Pro | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Ivy Bridge) |
| 548 | 2011 15″ MacBook Pro | AMD Radeon HD 6490M (Terascale 2) |
| 572 | ~PS3 | nVidia GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
| 576 | 2008-2009 15″ & 17″ MacBook Pro | nVidia GeForce 9600M GT (G9x) |
| 600 | 2010 MacBook Air | nVidia GeForce 320M |
| 600 | 2010 13″ MacBook Pro | nVidia GeForce 320M |
| 600 | 2010 MacBook | nVidia GeForce 320M |
| 600 | 2010 Mac mini | nVidia GeForce 320M |
| 604 | ~Xbox 360 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT |
| 638 | 2011 MacBook Air | Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Sandy Bridge) |
| 638 | 2011 Mac mini | Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Sandy Bridge) |
| 638 | 2011 13″ MacBook Pro | Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Sandy Bridge) |
| 636 | 2007-2009 15″ & 17″ MacBook Pro | nVidia GeForce 8600M GT (G8x) |
| 674 | 2006 15″ & 17″ MacBook Pro | ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 |
| 693 | 2008-2009 MacBook | nVidia GeForce 9400M |
| 693 | 2008-2009 MacBook Air | nVidia GeForce 9400M |
| 693 | 2009 13″ MacBook Pro | nVidia GeForce 9400M |
| 772 | 2004-2005 15″ & 17″ PowerBook G4 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 |
| 776 | 2003 15″ & 17″ PowerBook G4 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 |
| 791 | 2007-2009 MacBook | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100 |
| 791 | 2008 MacBook Air | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100 |
| 812 | 2003-2005 12″ PowerBook G4 | nVidia GeForce FX Go 5200 |
| 816 | 2003 17″ PowerBook G4 | nVidia GeForce 4 440 Go |
| 817 | 2003 12″ PowerBook G4 | nVidia GeForce 4 420 Go |
Novabench — Video Card Chart
Novabench
DownloadMy Account
Overview
- Average score
-
338
Score distribution
5001,0001,500
Top GPUs
| Score | Part | Compare |
|---|---|---|
| 1546 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | |
| 1451 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
| 1440 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
| 1400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
| 1400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
| 1392 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
| 1353 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
| 1336 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
| 1334 | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
| 1330 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
| 1324 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
| 1236 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
| 1221 | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | |
| 1147 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | |
| 1144 | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
| 1143 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
| 1134 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| 1120 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
| 1119 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | |
| 1100 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
| 1090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | |
| 1067 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
| 1057 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
| 1050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 | |
| 1043 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
| 1042 | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | |
| 1038 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
| 1032 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
| 1021 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
| 1011 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | |
| 1006 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti SLI x2 | |
| 996 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
| 972 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | |
| 969 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
| 969 | NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) | |
| 969 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
| 968 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 | |
| 935 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SLI x2 | |
| 929 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
| 927 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
| 926 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 | |
| 923 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
| 919 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI x2 | |
| 914 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti SLI x2 | |
| 913 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI x2 | |
| 905 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
| 895 | Radeon RX Vega | |
| 895 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | |
| 893 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
| 884 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | |
| 880 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
| 870 | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
| 866 | Radeon RX 5500 XT | |
| 864 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
| 857 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
| 850 | Radeon RX 590 Series | |
| 839 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 SLI x2 | |
| 830 | AMD Radeon VII | |
| 829 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | |
| 816 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | |
| 816 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design | |
| 815 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
| 813 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
| 811 | Radeon RX 580 Series | |
| 784 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| 782 | Radeon RX 570 Series | |
| 775 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
| 772 | Radeon RX 480 Graphics | |
| 770 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| 768 | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
| 767 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Black | |
| 765 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
| 752 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | |
| 749 | AMD Radeon R9 390 Series | |
| 743 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 | |
| 739 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
| 737 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
| 732 | Radeon RX 470 Graphics | |
| 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | |
| 728 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | |
| 711 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
| 699 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
| 693 | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | |
| 666 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 SLI x2 | |
| 659 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
| 653 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
| 652 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
| 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
| 647 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
| 647 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | |
| 645 | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | |
| 641 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
| 640 | AMD Radeon R9 380 Series | |
| 640 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
| 639 | AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | |
| 622 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
| 615 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
| 609 | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| 606 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
| 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 | |
| 591 | Radeon Pro 580 | |
| 589 | Radeon RX 580 | |
| 588 | Radeon Pro 580X | |
| 586 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
| 586 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
| 586 | AMD Radeon Graphics | |
| 585 | Radeon RX 570 | |
| 581 | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | |
| 581 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
| 580 | Radeon Pro 575 | |
| 578 | Radeon Pro 575X | |
| 577 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
| 572 | Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
| 572 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
| 570 | Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
| 569 | Radeon RX 560 Series | |
| 568 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (192-bit) | |
| 568 | Radeon Pro 570X | |
| 566 | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| 565 | Radeon Pro 570 | |
| 564 | ASUS R9 280 Series | |
| 564 | AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900 Series | |
| 561 | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | |
| 560 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | |
| 559 | AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series | |
| 557 | Radeon RX 460 Graphics | |
| 554 | Apple M1 | |
| 554 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
| 553 | AMD Radeon RX 560 Series | |
| 551 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
| 549 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | |
| 548 | AMD Radeon R9 M395X | |
| 544 | Intel UHD Graphics | |
| 544 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
| 543 | AMD Radeon R7 370 Series | |
| 541 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
| 538 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | |
| 534 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | |
| 534 | AMD Radeon R9 M395 | |
| 533 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
| 530 | AMD Radeon HD 7xxx | |
| 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | |
| 523 | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
| 522 | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | |
| 522 | Radeon RX 560 | |
| 515 | Intel HD Graphics P630 | |
| 514 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
| 513 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
| 513 | AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series | |
| 513 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
| 512 | AMD Radeon R7 370 Series Graphics | |
| 511 | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | |
| 510 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| 504 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
| 503 | AMD Radeon R9 M290 | |
| 501 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
| 499 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST | |
| 498 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M | |
| 496 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | |
| 495 | AMD FirePro D300 | |
| 493 | AMD FirePro D700 | |
| 481 | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | |
| 480 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
| 474 | AMD FirePro D500 | |
| 472 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
| 471 | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | |
| 469 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
| 469 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
| 467 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | |
| 464 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| 462 | Radeon 550 Series | |
| 459 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
| 458 | Radeon RX 550 Series | |
| 454 | Radeon RX550550 Series | |
| 449 | AMD Radeon R7 360 Series | |
| 449 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
| 449 | NVIDIA GeForce GPU | |
| 448 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
| 443 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
| 438 | Radeon Pro 555X | |
| 433 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
| 433 | AMD Radeon R9 360 | |
| 432 | ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series | |
| 430 | Radeon RX 550 | |
| 429 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
| 429 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
| 426 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
| 423 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
| 422 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
| 421 | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | |
| 420 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
| 419 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
| 415 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics | |
| 415 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
| 413 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| 411 | Radeon X1950 Pro | |
| 406 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | |
| 406 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
| 398 | CyberLink Mirror Driver | |
| 396 | Citrix Indirect Display Adapter | |
| 395 | DisplayLink USB Device | |
| 391 | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | |
| 390 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
| 382 | AMD Radeon Pro 450 | |
| 378 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 | |
| 376 | GeForce GTX 580 | |
| 373 | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
| 362 | ATI Radeon HD NI40 | |
| 361 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
| 361 | AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series | |
| 356 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
| 356 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
| 355 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
| 354 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
| 346 | Intel HD Graphics P530 | |
| 343 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
| 340 | ASUS HD7770 Series | |
| 339 | Radeon HD 6800 Series | |
| 339 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
| 338 | mv video hook driver2 | |
| 337 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
| 336 | AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series | |
| 333 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 Series | |
| 331 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics | |
| 331 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
| 320 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
| 319 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | |
| 318 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
| 318 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
| 317 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| 317 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 | |
| 317 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
| 312 | GeForce GTX 260 | |
| 311 | ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series | |
| 311 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | |
| 309 | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| 308 | AMD Radeon R9 M370X | |
| 308 | NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT | |
| 306 | Radeon X1650 Series | |
| 301 | VNC Mirror Driver | |
| 301 | LogMeIn Mirror Driver | |
| 299 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
| 299 | AMD Radeon HD 5800 Series | |
| 297 | AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series | |
| 297 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| 296 | GeForce GTX 570 | |
| 296 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | |
| 295 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 | |
| 294 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | |
| 293 | Radmin Mirror Driver V3 | |
| 292 | ATI Radeon HD 6xxx | |
| 291 | GeForce GTX 460 | |
| 286 | NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT | |
| 276 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
| 276 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| 275 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| 274 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 | |
| 274 | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | |
| 273 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
| 271 | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | |
| 270 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| 268 | NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS | |
| 268 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
| 268 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
| 267 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
| 264 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
| 264 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics | |
| 261 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
| 259 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
| 258 | AMD Radeon R7 250 Series | |
| 254 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
| 253 | BB Capture Driver | |
| 252 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| 251 | DameWare Development Mirror Driver 64-bit | |
| 251 | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | |
| 250 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
| 246 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
| 246 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ | |
| 246 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | |
| 245 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M | |
| 244 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
| 242 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics | |
| 241 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
| 240 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
| 238 | AMD Radeon HD 6900M Series | |
| 238 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
| 236 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
| 236 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics | |
| 236 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
| 234 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
| 233 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 | |
| 232 | Mirage Driver | |
| 232 | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | |
| 232 | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
| 229 | Intel Iris Pro | |
| 228 | AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series | |
| 227 | GeForce GTS 250 | |
| 225 | AMD Radeon HD 5700 Series | |
| 225 | AMD Radeon HD 6xxx | |
| 223 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | |
| 222 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M | |
| 221 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
| 216 | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 | |
| 215 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
| 215 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | |
| 212 | ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series | |
| 212 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
| 211 | ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series | |
| 211 | AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics | |
| 211 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
| 208 | AMD Radeon R7 Series | |
| 208 | GeForce GTS 450 | |
| 208 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
| 205 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 | |
| 205 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
| 204 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
| 203 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5800 Series | |
| 203 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | |
| 201 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 | |
| 200 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
| 199 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
| 199 | ATI Radeon HD 5000 | |
| 199 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | |
| 198 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
| 197 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M | |
| 197 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 | |
| 194 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | |
| 193 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
| 191 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | |
| 191 | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M | |
| 191 | AMD Radeon HD 6970M | |
| 189 | Intel HD Graphics 620 | |
| 189 | AMD Radeon HD 6700M Series | |
| 187 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 | |
| 187 | GeForce GTX 560 | |
| 187 | Microsoft Hyper-V Video | |
| 187 | GeForce 9800 GT | |
| 186 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
| 186 | Windows Live Display Driver | |
| 186 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | |
| 185 | AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5800 Series | |
| 185 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | |
| 185 | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| 184 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
| 184 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 | |
| 184 | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | |
| 183 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
| 183 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 | |
| 182 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 | |
| 181 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
| 181 | GeForce 9600 GT | |
| 179 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS | |
| 178 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | |
| 178 | AMD Radeon HD 8650G | |
| 177 | AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics | |
| 176 | NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT | |
| 175 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
| 175 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
| 174 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | |
| 174 | Intel HD Graphics 520 | |
| 174 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | |
| 172 | Unknown NVIDIA card | |
| 172 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
| 172 | AMD Radeon HD 5670 | |
| 171 | AMD Radeon HD 7500 Series | |
| 170 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
| 167 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
| 165 | Standard VGA Graphics Adapter | |
| 165 | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | |
| 164 | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | |
| 164 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
| 163 | Intel Iris | |
| 163 | NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS | |
| 163 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
| 163 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS | |
| 163 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
| 162 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
| 162 | ATI Radeon HD 3800 Series | |
| 161 | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | |
| 160 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
| 160 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
| 160 | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
| 160 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | |
| 159 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | |
| 158 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | |
| 158 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE | |
| 157 | AMD Radeon HD 7660D | |
| 156 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
| 156 | Intel HD Graphics 615 | |
| 155 | Radeon HD 6770M | |
| 155 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
| 155 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
| 155 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
| 154 | AMD Radeon HD 7600G | |
| 154 | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | |
| 154 | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | |
| 154 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | |
| 153 | NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT | |
| 153 | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | |
| 152 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
| 152 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | |
| 152 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
| 152 | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | |
| 152 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
| 152 | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | |
| 152 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M | |
| 151 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
| 151 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
| 151 | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
| 151 | Intel HD Graphics 515 | |
| 149 | Intel HD Graphics Family | |
| 149 | Intel HD Graphics 510 | |
| 149 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | |
| 148 | AMD Radeon HD 5570 | |
| 148 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M | |
| 148 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | |
| 148 | AMD Radeon HD 8610G | |
| 147 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 | |
| 147 | AMD Radeon HD 8570D | |
| 147 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | |
| 146 | AMD Radeon HD 7600M Series | |
| 146 | AMD Radeon HD 7660G | |
| 146 | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | |
| 146 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
| 146 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | |
| 146 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
| 146 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
| 145 | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | |
| 145 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
| 144 | AMD Radeon HD 7500M7600M Series | |
| 143 | Unknown | |
| 143 | ATI Radeon HD 5500 Series | |
| 143 | AMD Radeon HD 6500M/5600/5700 Series | |
| 143 | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| 142 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
| 142 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
| 142 | Intel HD Graphics 610 | |
| 142 | NVIDIA NVS 5200M | |
| 141 | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | |
| 141 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | |
| 140 | AMD Radeon HD 8600M Series | |
| 140 | NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT | |
| 140 | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | |
| 138 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
| 138 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
| 138 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
| 138 | AMD Radeon HD 6550D | |
| 138 | NVIDIA GeForce 7300 LE | |
| 138 | AMD Radeon HD 7640G | |
| 138 | AMD Radeon HD 8550G | |
| 136 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
| 136 | AMD Radeon HD 7570M | |
| 136 | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | |
| 136 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | |
| 135 | AMD Radeon HD 7520G | |
| 135 | ATYRadeonX1900 | |
| 135 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | |
| 135 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | |
| 135 | AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| 134 | ATI Radeon HD 3870 | |
| 134 | AMD Radeon HD 8470D | |
| 134 | NVIDIA GeForce 6600 | |
| 133 | AMD Radeon HD 5500 Series | |
| 133 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 | |
| 133 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
| 133 | AMD Radeon HD 6500 Series | |
| 132 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 | |
| 131 | NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS | |
| 131 | AMD Radeon HD 7540D | |
| 131 | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
| 130 | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | |
| 130 | AMD Radeon HD 8510G | |
| 130 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | |
| 129 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | |
| 128 | AMD Radeon HD 7650M | |
| 128 | AMD Radeon 6600M and 6700M Series | |
| 127 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
| 127 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730 | |
| 127 | AMD Radeon HD 6600 Series | |
| 126 | ATI Radeon HD 4600 Series | |
| 124 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS | |
| 124 | AMD Radeon HD 6530D | |
| 123 | NVIDIA GeForce 6100 | |
| 123 | NVIDIA GeForce 7100 GS | |
| 123 | AMD Radeon HD 7500M/7600M Series | |
| 123 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | |
| 123 | ATI Radeon Xpress Series | |
| 122 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 | |
| 122 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | |
| 122 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 | |
| 121 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | |
| 120 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS | |
| 120 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 | |
| 119 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
| 119 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | |
| 119 | AMD Radeon HD 6520G | |
| 119 | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| 118 | AMD Radeon HD 8330 | |
| 118 | AMD Radeon HD 7500G | |
| 118 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M | |
| 118 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 | |
| 117 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 | |
| 117 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT | |
| 116 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
| 116 | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
| 116 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
| 116 | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | |
| 116 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
| 115 | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 Series | |
| 115 | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | |
| 115 | AMD Radeon HD 6480G | |
| 114 | AMD Radeon HD 8370D | |
| 114 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | |
| 114 | AMD Radeon HD 7480D | |
| 113 | NVIDIA NVS 5100M | |
| 113 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 | |
| 113 | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | |
| 113 | NVIDIA NVS 4200M | |
| 113 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 | |
| 113 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 | |
| 113 | NVIDIA GeForce 610M | |
| 112 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
| 112 | AMD Radeon HD 7450 | |
| 111 | NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 | |
| 111 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 | |
| 111 | NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache | |
| 111 | AMD Radeon HD 6750M | |
| 111 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | |
| 111 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS | |
| 111 | AMD Radeon HD 7400 Series | |
| 110 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | |
| 110 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | |
| 110 | AMD Radeon HD 7400M Series | |
| 109 | Mobile Intel HD Graphics | |
| 109 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | |
| 109 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | |
| 109 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS | |
| 109 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | |
| 108 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Series | |
| 108 | AMD Radeon HD 6470M | |
| 108 | NVIDIA GeForce 6150 LE | |
| 108 | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | |
| 108 | NVIDIA GeForce 410M | |
| 107 | AMD Radeon HD 6410D | |
| 107 | Radeon HD 6490M | |
| 107 | Radeon X300 Series | |
| 107 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT | |
| 106 | ATI Radeon X1200 Series | |
| 106 | Radeon HD 6470M | |
| 106 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M | |
| 105 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
| 105 | NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 405 | |
| 104 | AMD Radeon HD 7470M | |
| 103 | AMD Radeon HD 7340 Graphics | |
| 103 | AMD Radeon HD 6650M | |
| 103 | AMD Radeon HD 5450 | |
| 103 | NVIDIA GeForce 315M | |
| 102 | NVIDIA GeForce 9200 | |
| 102 | AMD Radeon HD 6300M Series | |
| 102 | AMD Radeon HD 6630M | |
| 102 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS | |
| 102 | AMD Radeon HD 8240 | |
| 102 | Intel HD Graphics 500 | |
| 101 | NVIDIA GeForce G210M | |
| 101 | NVIDIA GeForce 8200 | |
| 101 | AMD Radeon HD 6350 | |
| 101 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
| 100 | AMD Radeon HD 7310 Graphics | |
| 100 | AMD Radeon HD 6320 Graphics | |
| 99 | NVIDIA GeForce 6200 | |
| 99 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470 | |
| 99 | ATI Radeon HD 5400 Series | |
| 99 | NVIDIA NVS 310 | |
| 99 | AMD M880G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 | |
| 99 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | |
| 98 | AMD Radeon HD 6310 Graphics | |
| 97 | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | |
| 97 | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
| 96 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS | |
| 95 | AMD Radeon HD 6250 Graphics | |
| 95 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | |
| 95 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 | |
| 94 | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | |
| 94 | ATI Radeon HD 4350 | |
| 94 | GeForce 9500 GT | |
| 93 | NVIDIA GeForce 9100 | |
| 93 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
| 93 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS | |
| 92 | NVIDIA GeForce 315 | |
| 92 | Intel HD Graphics | |
| 92 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5400 Series | |
| 91 | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | |
| 91 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 | |
| 90 | NVIDIA NVS 300 | |
| 90 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | |
| 90 | ATI Radeon HD 5600 Series | |
| 90 | ASUS EAH5450 Series | |
| 90 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 | |
| 90 | GeForce GT 240 | |
| 89 | Intel G33G31 Express Chipset Family | |
| 88 | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
| 88 | AMD Radeon HD 6490M | |
| 87 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | |
| 87 | Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM) | |
| 87 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 Series | |
| 87 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO | |
| 87 | NVIDIA NVS 3100M | |
| 87 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 | |
| 87 | NVIDIA GeForce 310 | |
| 86 | Intel Q33 Express Chipset Family | |
| 86 | ATI Radeon HD 43004500 Series | |
| 85 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 | |
| 85 | Intel Q35 Express Chipset Family | |
| 85 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT | |
| 85 | ATI Radeon HD 3300 Graphics | |
| 85 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
| 84 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 | |
| 84 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT | |
| 84 | NVIDIA GeForce G105M | |
| 83 | NVIDIA GeForce G 105M | |
| 82 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series | |
| 82 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M | |
| 82 | NVIDIA GeForce G210 | |
| 82 | Microsoft Basic Display Adapter | |
| 81 | ATI Radeon HD 3600 Series | |
| 81 | NVIDIA ION | |
| 79 | ATI Radeon HD 3400 Series | |
| 79 | AMD Radeon HD 6290 Graphics | |
| 79 | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
| 78 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 | |
| 78 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | |
| 77 | ATI Radeon HD 3450 | |
| 77 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 | |
| 76 | ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics | |
| 75 | VMware SVGA 3D | |
| 75 | ATI Radeon HD 4200 | |
| 74 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150 | |
| 74 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| 74 | ATI Radeon HD 4290 | |
| 74 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series | |
| 74 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
| 73 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | |
| 71 | Intel 82945G Express Chipset Family | |
| 71 | AMD M880G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 | |
| 71 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 Series | |
| 70 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 | |
| 70 | Intel 4 Series Internal Chipset | |
| 70 | ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics | |
| 68 | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G | |
| 68 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro | |
| 67 | AMD 760G | |
| 66 | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | |
| 62 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 | |
| 62 | Mobile Intel 945 Express Chipset Family | |
| 62 | Intel G45G43 Express Chipset | |
| 61 | Intel Q45Q43 Express Chipset | |
| 59 | ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics | |
| 58 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 / R3 Series | |
| 57 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500/5100 Series | |
| 54 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
| 52 | ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Series | |
| 50 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 | |
| 50 | ATYRadeonX1600 | |
| 48 | Intel G41 Express Chipset | |
| 47 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 | |
| 47 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
| 39 | ATI Radeon HD 4300/4500 Series | |
| 38 | GeForce 8400 GS | |
| 38 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
| 37 | ConfigMgr Remote Control Driver | |
| 36 | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3150 | |
| 31 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 | |
| 29 | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
| 29 | Mobile Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family | |
| 29 | NVIDIA GeForce 320M | |
| 24 | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD | |
| 24 | Radeon X1300/X1550 Series | |
| 23 | VMware SVGA II | |
| 21 | GMA X3100 | |
| 21 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400M | |
| 19 | Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset | |
| 17 | GMA 950 | |
| 17 | Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset | |
| 14 | NVIDIA GeForce 7025 / NVIDIA nForce 630a | |
| 10 | NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE/7200 GS | |
| 9 | NVIDIA GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i | |
| 8 | Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Series | |
| 8 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 | |
| 8 | Intel G965 Express Chipset Family | |
| 6 | ATI Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Series | |
| 6 | ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series | |
| 6 | NVIDIA GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M | |
| 5 | ATI Mobility Radeon X300 | |
| 3 | Intel Q965/Q963 Express Chipset Family | |
| 3 | Intel G33/G31 Express Chipset Family | |
| 3 | Intel 946GZ Express Chipset Family | |
| 3 | Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family | |
| 2 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 | |
| 2 | Intel 82915G/GV/910GL Express Chipset Family | |
| 2 | Mobile Intel 945GM Express Chipset Family | |
| 2 | ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M Series |
Privacy PolicyLegal
Copyright © 2007-2022 Novabench Inc.
Novabench
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 555X and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
versus
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 10 month(s)
- more than 3MHz(core frequency) vs 300 MHz
- 16 times more shader processor(s): 768 vs 48
- About 87% more Geekbench — OpenCL performance: 13877 vs 7413
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 44% faster: 668.308 vs 465.116
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 13% faster: 3.158 about 70% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 49.593 vs 29.115
- 3.1x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark : 170.952 vs 54.932
- About 47% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 2780
- About 25% more performance in GFXBench 4.
0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2350
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark is about 25% more: 2350 vs 1884
4 about 47% more in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 4093 vs 2780
| Issue date | 16 July 2018 vs 1 September 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Core frequency | 907 MHz vs 300 MHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of shaders | 768 vs 48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 13877 vs 7413 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 vs 465.116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 29.115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 54.932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 2780 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 1884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 vs 2780 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 1884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GFXBench 4. |
3351 vs 3343 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 35.283 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1. |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4. |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4. |
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 13877 | 7413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 37.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 465. |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 2.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 29.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 54.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4. |
4093 | 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3343 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1765 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 619 |
Performance comparison
| AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | GCN 4. |
Generation 9.5 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Production date | July 16, 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in the ranking | 866 | 916 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Core frequency | 907MHz | 300 MHz |
| Process | 14nm | 14nm |
| Number of shaders | 768 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 189 million |
| Boost core clock | 1200MHz | |
| Video connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 3. |
PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Additional power connectors | None | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory frequency | 5100MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / DDR4 |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 with Retina display Mid 2019 (Intel Core i7 2600 MHz/15.
4″/2880×1800/16GB/256GB SSD/DVD no/AMD Radeon Pro 555X/Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/macOS)
*
| Screen resolution | 2880×1800 | |
| Drive type | HDD+SSD, SSD | 6 |
| Video card type | integrated, discrete, discrete and integrated |
Type
*
| Type | laptop |
| Operating system | macOS |
Processor
*
| Processor core | Coffee Lake |
| L3 cache size | 12 MB, 9 MB |
| Number of processor cores | 6 |
| Processor | Intel Core i7 2600 MHz |
Memory
*
| Memory | 16GB DDR4 2400MHz |
Image
*
| Screen type | glossy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Screen type | TFT IPS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Screen |
| Optical drive | no |
| Storage capacity (HDD+SSD, SSD) | 256 GB |
2
*
| Interfaces | mic in/out Headphones Combo, Thunderbolt 3×4 |
| Wireless | Wi-Fi IEEE 802. |
Power supply
*
| Battery capacity | 83.6 W 8 |
| Type of battery | Li-Pol |
| Opening hours from the battery | 10 h |
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
*
| The Touch Bar | touch panel is |
| Touchpad |
Sound
*
| Built -in microphone | is | ||||
| Sound chipset | Intel High Definition Audio | ||||
| Dimensions (LxWxD) | 349. |
| Weight | 1.83 kg |
| Webcam | yes |
| Fingerprint reader | yes |
* Check with the seller for exact specifications.
intel iris plus graphics 655 vs radeon pro 555 – Vlybok
Obviously, the 2 GB Nvidia MX 150 is a more powerful GPU than the Intel Iris Plus 655. Around 50% faster. Actually, the Intel Iris Plus 655 is an integrated GPU and only comes with the premium i7 models and mostly used in apple and microsoft lapto
Intel Iris Graphics and Intel Iris Pro Graphics are the IGP series introduced in 2013 with some models of Haswell processors as the high-performance versions of HD Graphics. Iris Pro Graphics was the first in the series to incorporate embedded DRAM. In the fourth quarter of 2013, Intel integrated graphics represented, in units, 65% of all PC graphics processor shipments.
Intel’s Iris GPUs, which are marketed as either Iris Plus (current gen), Iris Pro (last gen) or just plain Iris (last gen), promise significantly faster performance than regular Intel HD Graphics.
HDs 630/Radeon Pro 555 15″ 2017 MacBookPro15.1 Caffee Lake Intel UHD Graphics 630 15″ 2018 MacBookPro15.2 Caffee Lake Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 13″ 2018 MacBookPro15.3 Caffee Lake UHD630ee/ 15″ 2019 MacBookPro15 Lake 15″ 2019
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 AMD Radeon R9 M470 NVIDIA Quadro K3100M AMD FirePro W5170M AMD Radeon R9 M370X AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 3.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 4.1 1.2 MacBook Pro (15palcový, 2017) Intel HD Graphics 630 Radeon Pro 555 2 GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 4GB VRAM 4.1 1.2 MacBook Pro (13palcový, 2017, čtyři porty Thunderbolt 3) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 4. 1 1.2 Intel Iris
13-inch MacBook Pro 15-inch MacBook Pro Starting Price $1,799 $2,399 CPU 8th Gen, four-core Intel Core i5, i7 9th Gen, six-core Intel Core i7, i9 GPU Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 Radeon Pro 555X
Iris Plus Graphics G7 es una de las gráficas integradas de nueva hornada (Gen 11) y junto a las nuevas dedicadas que llegarán en 2020, fruto de la inversión de Intel para
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640性能跑分 3DMark Fire Strike (G )：1546 Unigine Heaven 3.0：-Unigine Heaven 4.0：-Unigine Superposition：-英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 640的竞争对手 AMD Radeon R7 M265（2GB DDR3） NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M（4GB DDR3） Intel
There are two methods to identify the integrated graphics controller (hardware) in your computer. Integrated graphics controllers are also called video cards or graphics cards. Check the following link to identify the Intel® Graphics Driver Version installed on your computer.
Windows® 10 version 1709 or higher Windows® 10 DCH Intel® Graphics Driver version 25. 20.100.6618 or newerSteps To Install: Open the URL for the Microsoft Store Intel® Graphics Control Panel application or search for the Intel Graphics Control Panel using the search bar in the Microsoft Store.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 – benchmark tests, specifications and information LaptopMedia.com Laptop GPU Specs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 From: Simeon Nikolov 20 April 2018 / 07:33 | 0
The Radeon pro 560 has: More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory Slightly higher clock speed 925 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed Slightly more shading units 1,024 vs 768 256 more shading units Slightly more texture mapping unit
5/6/2018 2.8GHz quad-core 7th-generation Intel Core i7 processor, Turbo Boost up to 3.8GHz 16GB 2133MHz LPDDR3 memory 512GB SSD storage Radeon Pro 555 with 2GB memory My question is should I take Radeon Pro 555 or upgrade Radeon Pro 560.Is is
第 8 代 intel® Core i5 處理器 產品 附有 詳細 的 產品 功能 和 規格 之。 產品 名稱 推出 日期 核心 數量 最大 處理器 頻率 快取 記憶體 處理 繪圖 ‡ 建議 客戶 價格 比較 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部|無 Intel® Core i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 4. 1 1.2 MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017) Intel HD Graphics 630 Radeon Pro 555 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 4GB VRAM 4.1 1.2 MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2017, Four Thunderbolt 3 ports) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.1 1.2 MacBook Pro
Intel Graphics Technology[4] (GT)[a] is the collective name for a series of integrated graphics processors (IGPs) produced by Intel that are manufactured on the same package or die as the central processing unit (CPU). It was first introduced in 2010 as Intel HD Graphics. Intel Iris Graphics and Intel Iris Pro Graphics are the IGP series
History
Support information for Intel® Iris® Plus Graphics 650 Processor Graphics‡ Graphics Base Frequency Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency Graphics Video Max Memory eDRAM Graphics Output 4K Support Max Resolution (HDMI 1.4)‡
Last three iterations of Intel Iris graphics for Skylake architecture: * Iris Graphics 540, GT3e – 48 execution units with 64 MB of eDRAM, up to 806.4 GFLOPS at 1.05 GHz * Iris Graphics 550, GT3e – 48 execution units with 64 MB of eDRAM (the same
2018 MacBook Pro 13″ i5. 8g, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 Blizzard Gaming submitted 11 months ago by flybythesun 26 comments share save hide report all 26 comments sorted by: best top new controversial old random q&a live (beta) Want to add to the
Our Can I run it for Mac guide will help you figure out whether you have a gaming Mac or not. It features more than 100 tests (and growing). These results are great to have but they’re only part of the answer. In order to effectively figure out what games your Mac can run, you should:
L’Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) est un processeur graphique d’abord vue dans l’Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Entry, 2019) à la mi-2019. elle est similaire à l’Iris Plus Graphics 655 des CPU de 28 W. La version GT3e des GPU Coffee Lake possède toujours 48 unités
La scheda grafica Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) Ë una scheda grafica per processori che Ë stata vista per la prima volta nell’Apple MacBook Pro 13 a met‡ del 2019. » simile alla Iris Plus Graphics 655 nelle CPU da 28 Watt.
2.4GHz quad-core 8th-generation Intel Core i5 processor Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 8GB 2133MHz LPDDR3 memory 256GB SSD storage¹ Retina display with True Tone Touch Bar and Touch ID Four Thunderbolt 3 ports
尋找適用于 intel® 繪圖 驅動 程式 支援 資訊 、 下載 以及 更 多 適用于 適用于 intel® 顯示 晶片 程式 的 安裝 疑 排解 嚮導 使用 此 嚮導 協助 您 嘗試 適用 于 您 的 intel® 繪圖 驅動 驅動 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖 繪圖A程式 時 可能 會 發生
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 图形 相当于 市面 上 gtx 系列 哪个 我 来 答 新人 红包 页 在 问 问题 娱乐 游戏 游戏 都 是 intel 处理器 的 核心 显卡 ， intel Iris Pro Graphics所以区别就是同属 Intel
狀態: 發問中
Welcome to the Geekbench Metal Benchmark Chart. The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only
de nombreux SoC (Système sur Puce/System on Chip) d’un TDP de 28 Watts tels que le
第 8 代 intel® Core i7 處理器 產品 附有 詳細 的 產品 功能 和 規格 之。 產品 名稱 狀態 日期 核心 數量 最大 處理器 基礎 快取 記憶體 處理 繪圖 ‡ 建議 客戶 價格 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部 全部|無 Intel® Core i7-8665UE Processor
10th Gen Intel Core with Iris Plus new Graphics architecture delivers substantial improvements in performance, power efficiency and features compared to our previous graphics architectures. At Computex 2019, Intel disclosed details of its latest 10 th Gen Intel Core Processor which includes Intel’s new graphics architecture, Gen11 Graphics, also known as Intel Iris Plus Graphics.
L’AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 mobile est une carte graphique professionnelle pour portables. Elle est basée sur la Radeon RX 550 grand public, et utilise de ce fait la même puce Polaris 12 (nom de code Lexa). Les 640 nuanceurs (10 units de calcul) sont cadencés
L’Intel Iris Graphics 550 (GT3e) è una scheda grafica integrata della generazione Skylake. Come successore della Iris Graphics 6100 (Broadwell), la Iris Graphics 550 si può trovare nelle CPUs da 28-watt ed offre 64 MB di memoria eDRAM dedicata.
Find support information, downloads, and more for Intel® Graphics Drivers. Installation Troubleshooting Wizard for Intel® Graphics Drivers Use this step-by-step wizard to help you with issues that may occur when trying to install the graphics driver for your Intel
La AMD Radeon Pro 5500M Ë una scheda grafica mobile di fascia media basata sul chip Navi 14 (architettura RDNA) prodotta nel moderno processo da 7 nm. » dotata di tutte le 24 CU del chip (=1.536 shader) e quindi di 2 CU in pi˘ rispetto alla simile Radeon RX
Intel’s 7th-gen processors feature both Intel HD Graphics and Intel Iris Plus graphics chips, with the latter usually reserved for high-end The best new Intel HD Graphics processors for
Specyfikacja i testy Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (GPU). Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 300 – 1200 (Boost) MHz Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 300 – 1100 (Boost) MHz 64/128 bit Intel HD, UHD, and Iris Graphics Cards of 8th, 7th and 6th Gen with their Hierarchy. Learn the secret to Improve the gaming performance on Intel HD Graphics and list of all games that you can play. Find out the difference between Intel’s Integrated GPU vs
Steps to troubleshoot a problem when the colors on your monitor are too red, green, blue, or yellow. Note Windows® 10 users: Before attempting the steps outlined here, ensure you have updated your device to the latest build of Windows 10.Windows® 10 Builds
A Intel Iris Graphics 550 (GT3e) . Como sucessora da Iris Graphics 6100 (Broadwell), a Iris Graphics 550 pode ser encontrada em CPUs da série de 28-watts e oferece 64 MB de memória eDRAM dedicada.
Specyfikacja i testy Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GPU). Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 300 – 1200 (Boost) MHz Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 300 – 1100 (Boost) MHz 64/128 bit Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 300 – 1150 (Boost) MHz
To find the maximum resolution available on your Intel® Graphics Technology for 4th Generation Intel® Core Processors (formerly known as Haswell) and newer, follow these steps.: Identify your processor. If you don’t know your model number, you can use the Intel® Processor Identification Utility.
Windows® If you notice graphics issues while playing Diablo III, make sure your video drivers are up-to-date. Supported Note: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT, ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT, and Intel HD Graphics 4000 are the minimum required cards to run Diablo III. . Competitors from Nvidia Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655-7% AMD Radeon R9 M280X -5% AMD Radeon RX Vega 9-4% NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M-3%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 HD 5500 HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 615
2. 4GHz 4 核心第 8 代 Intel Core i5 處理器 Turbo Boost 最高可達 4.4GHz 8GB 2133MHz LPDDR3 記憶體 256GB SSD 儲存裝置¹ 具備原彩顯示技術的 Retina 顯示器 觸控列和 Touch ID 四個 Thunderbolt 3 埠 90leasing003
They all have an Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU on board with 128MB edram. Five models are mentioned on the on the
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Kaby Lake integrated graphics card announced in January 2017. It is designed for 15W processors and is equipped with 64MB eDRAM cache, has 48 execution units and works with
Definitely unplayable settings on Ultrawide resolution given some early testing in other games. 「The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 in the MacBook Pro support modest gaming, as it ran Dirt 3 (set to medium at 1650 x 1050 resolution) at 41 frames per second, which
Coffee Lake with Iris Plus at 28W Intel recently announced its ‘Intel Core with Radeon RX Vega’ processor line, featuring a H-series processor combined with an AMD graphics chip and a sizeable
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics es el nombre de la GPU en la APU AMD A10-7850K Kaveri. Es una GPU integrada sin memoria gráfica dedicada y se basa en la arquitectura GCN 1.1 (o 2.0) de las tarjetas de video de desktop Hawaii (por ejemplo R9 290). Sin embargo
New MacBook Pro models — with improved keyboard and 8th Gen Intel Core 9 processors0001
Apple
Macbook Pro
Notebooks
New MacBook Pro Models with Improved Keyboard and 8th Generation Intel Core Processors
Alexander Kuznetsov
—
Apple has announced the release of new MacBook Pro models. They received eighth generation Intel Core processors and an improved keyboard. The upgrade affected the 13-inch and 15-inch models, including those with the Touch Bar.
The 13-inch model received a quad-core Intel Core i5 or i7 processor up to 2.7 GHz, overclocked to 4. 5 GHz and an integrated Intel Iris Plus 640 or 655 graphics chip with 128 MB of eDRAM, 8 GB of RAM, as well as an SSD-drive up to 2 TB. Thickness — 14.9 mm, weight — 1.37 kg. The base model will cost $1,799.
15-inch model more attractive features: six-core Intel Core i7 or i9 processor up to 2.9GHz or 4.8 GHz turbo, up to 32 GB RAM, integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630, AMD Radeon Pro 555X or 560X discrete graphics with 4 GB memory, and up to 4 TB SSD. Thickness — 15.5 mm, weight — 1.83 kg. This model will cost between $2399 and $6699 depending on the configuration.
Apple says the 15-inch MacBook Pro saw a 70 percent performance boost with the new processors, while the 13-inch model doubled the performance. Both models feature True Tone screens, an Apple T2 co-processor and Touch Bar, and third-generation keyboards with quieter keystrokes. They will be the first Apple laptops on which you can call Siri with your voice. Among the ports, as before, four Thunderbolt connectors (USB Type-C) and an output for connecting headphones or speakers.
As an accessory to the novelties, it will be possible to purchase a leather case, released in black, brown and dark blue. Previously, Apple-branded cases were only available for the iPad and last year’s 12-inch MacBook.
When these MacBook Pro models will appear in Russia and how much they will cost is still unknown. Judging by the information from the Apple website, the most expensive modifications will not get into our country — with a Core i9 processorand more than 512 GB of memory.
iG channel in Telegram — t.me/iguides_ru
Buy advertising
Recommendations
-
10 practical gadgets from AliExpress for home and leisure
-
9 finds from AliExpress. These products will make your home better
-
A brand has appeared in Russia that most frankly copies Apple
Recommendations
10 practical gadgets from AliExpress for home and leisure
iPhone want to ban in Russia. The reason is reasonable
9 finds from AliExpress. These products will make your home better
A brand has appeared in Russia that most frankly copies Apple
Buy advertising
See also
World
Hackers
The most popular Russian application disappeared from the App Store
2GIS
App Store
Telegram 9.0.1 fixes an annoying glitch in iOS 16. But not everyone will be able to update
Telegram
Review of the Apple MacBook Pro 15 2021
Apple does not often please fans with significant design changes and innovations in its computers. So the recent update of the MacBook Pro line did not affect the devices externally, but several functional differences with the previous two generations did appear. So let’s take a look at what’s new in the 15-inch MacBook Pro 2021.
Apple MacBook Pro 15″ line 2021 Laptops, ultrabooks for
Models in the line: 50
Price range: 45 210 − 143 264 UAH
What’s new in the characteristics of MacBook Pro 2021?
Technical specifications are just what can give a rough idea of the performance and relevance of a laptop even before it is tested or purchased. And so it never hurts to know them. At least this way you can understand what kind of laptop modification you need. And in the case of the MacBook Pro, technical specifications also play a decisive role in the choice. Here’s what Apple has to offer with updated versions of its top laptops.
Processor : Intel Core i7-8750H 6 cores 2.2 GHz, Turbo Boost 4. 1 GHz / Intel Core i7-8850H 6 cores 2.6 GHz, Turbo Boost 4.3 GHz / Intel Core i9- 8950HK 6 cores 2.9 GHz, Turbo Boost 4.8 GHz (optional only).
RAM: 8 / 16 GB 2400 MHz LPDDR4. 32 GB 2400 MHz LPDDR4 (optional).
Storage: SSD 256 GB / 512 GB. 1 / 2 / 4 TB (optional).
Graphic adapter : Intel HD Graphics 630, AMD Radeon Pro 555X. AMD Radeon Pro 560X (optional).
Screen : 15.4”, IPS, 2880×1800, 220 ppi, Wide Color (P3), True Tone. There is a version with 13.3”, IPS, 2560×1600, 227 ppi.
Wireless interfaces: Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11a/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz).
Ports : 4 × Thunderbolt 3 (USB Type-C).
Touch ID: Yes.
Touch Bar: Yes.
Keyboard backlight: Yes.
Battery: Li-Pol, 58 Wh.
Dimensions: 304×212×14.9 mm.
Weight: 1.37 kg.
The 2021 MacBook Pro is a big improvement over its predecessors. The new MacBook has become a little heavier. But in terms of dimensions, it has not changed at all. And it is right. Since the design of the MacBook Pro case and its design has long been recognized as ideal. But technical specifications are only a small part of the changes and innovations. In order to understand how much the new MacBook is better than the old one, you need to consider all its key features. And that’s what we’re going to do now. But first, let’s see what modifications of the laptop can be in general.
Performance and Software
That’s where the upgrades are, under the hood. MacBook Pro 15 2021 now available with 6-core Intel Core i7 and i9 processors, Intel UHD 630 video paired with discrete Radeon Pro 555X/560X chips with 4GB of memory, available with 16GB and 32GB DDR4 RAM, and expandable storage up to 4 TB. As before, there is Wi-Fi with ac support, and the Bluetooth version this time is 5.0. I got the base package with an Intel Core i7-8750H, Radeon Pro 555X, 16 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD. As usual, an upgrade is not possible, everything is soldered immediately on the motherboard, which reduces maintainability to a minimum, and the possibility of replacing memory or a drive on your own stops in principle.
The addition of two additional CPU cores will go unnoticed by those who rarely deal with heavy tasks. But for those who work with file conversion, video processing, and others, which directly depends on the power of the system, the performance increase will be noticeable. For example: converting a video file takes a third less time on a 6-core processor, as opposed to a 4-core sixth generation. This is not the usual 5-10% increase in power from model to model, but a really noticeable increase in performance.
There are no significant changes to the 2021 MacBook Pro cooling system. At the very beginning of sales, there was a small scandal when there was a problem with overheating and throttling, but the next update eliminated this problem. The laptop itself practically does not heat up in the “office” work mode, but it gets warmer when discrete video is running, and under maximum load it heats up well at all. The sound of the CO is appropriate: in normal mode, at a couple of thousand revolutions, almost nothing is heard, but as soon as the fans accelerate, the noise from them becomes well audible.
The MacOS operating system, in turn, is practically the same as the version on other Apple laptops. Unless she has a couple of additional items in the settings. The most noticeable change will be the ability to call Siri without additional actions (there is even a separate T2 chip for this, which also deals with data security), but I’m not sure that this will be popular in our latitudes. Otherwise, with such components, the system works just fine and there were absolutely no problems during testing.
13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pro available
At this point in time, Apple is ready to offer customers several versions of the MacBook Pro. They differ not only in size, but also in filling. However, the most noticeable difference is the screen size. There are versions with 13 and 15 inches. At the same time, the screen technology remains exactly the same — Retina, which allows us to expect the correct color reproduction from any model. But the older version is also equipped with True Tone technology, which adjusts the screen temperature to the environment.
Now about the stuffing. Even the basic version 15-inch MacBook is much more powerful than the top-end configuration with a 13-inch screen. The Apple MacBook Pro 15 2021 shows much more interesting results in synthetic tests than the Apple MacBook Pro 13. But this is understandable. The company expects that fifteen-inch models with top-end filling will be bought up exclusively by professionals. And models with a smaller screen diagonal are provided to ordinary users. Now it’s time to consider the key features of the new laptops.
Design and usability
Some time ago I got a 15″ 2016 model. Feelings from the updated laptop have not changed at all. The device still uses an aluminum body in two color options: dark Space Gray and standard Silver. The size and weight have not changed: 349.3 × 240.7 × 15.5 mm, 1.83 kg. Calling the model a compact language still does not turn out, but as for the possibilities, the laptop is really small and quite mobile.
I already wrote about how it proved to be in use in the operating experience. After working with the MacBook Pro 15 2021 for some time, alas, there is nothing to add to what has already been said. All advantages and disadvantages remained in their places. In my opinion, there are no global problems with it, and a couple of inconveniences become completely invisible over time. You can read more about this here.
The situation with connecting external devices remains the same. Only USB Type-C/Thunderbolt 3 devices and headphones are connected directly. Everything else will require an appropriate adapter. The prices of such accessories do not change: good options will cost an average of $50-100, and «all-in-one and for all occasions» — $200 and more. In the new model, the ports are noticeably more tenacious, and you have to apply a little more effort when disconnecting the cable than with the previous model. On the one hand, this is good, because it will be more difficult to accidentally pull out the cord, but on the other hand, if you catch on the power cord, you can pull the laptop along.
In general, for a couple of years of sales of models in this design, he has proven himself well, except for the situation with keyboards, to which we will return.
The iconic look of the MacBook Pro with touchbar stripe
The company decided not to change the design of MacBooks. Precisely because he has long received a cult status. Almost everyone can accurately identify the MacBook Pro among laptops from other manufacturers. And Apple rightly felt that it would be wrong to deprive the MacBook of recognizable features. So the design hasn’t changed much. The only new feature is the touchbar strip above the keyboard. This is a very useful thing, which will be discussed in subsequent chapters.
The laptop keyboard has also undergone some cosmetic changes. And not only because of the updated design. The icons on the keys have moved up a bit. And it’s not bad in terms of ergonomics. Another feature is the frame around the display. In the new reincarnation of the laptop, they have become much thinner. This allowed the MacBook to look more modern. But the most interesting thing is that the dimensions remained the same. And this despite the fact that much more powerful components are installed on board the laptop.
The trackpad deserves special mention. Now it has become much larger, which (in theory) should increase its ergonomics. Another change concerns ports. Now the laptop has no classic USB. There is only Type-C, which supports the Thunderbolt protocol. The color scheme of the new laptops has not changed one iota. It’s the same uniform gray color. The material is also the same — metal. Moreover, the body is cut from a single piece of aluminum. Therefore, no seams on the body can not be found.
In general, the design of the novelty has remained unchanged. And this is just great, since the old versions of the MacBook Pro were valued precisely because of the chic appearance. The design of laptops is recognized as a reference by many professionals. Performance is also highly praised, but for those who work long hours at the computer, design and ergonomics are the most important things. However, this does not mean at all that the new laptop is no different from the old one. The devil is in the details. And in this regard, there are more than enough changes in the MacBook Pro. Let’s consider them in more detail.
Retina display with True Tone. One of the greatest strengths of
And it really is. The displays in the updated MacBooks have become even better. Now they display colors even more reliably and boast a completely new anti-reflective coating that allows you to successfully use the laptop even outdoors on the sunniest day. Another feature is realistic black color. Usually screens based on IPS matrix do not cope well with it. But the company’s engineers have brought their Retina displays to perfection. The black color really looks black on them.
True Tone technology deserves special mention. It first appeared on the iPhone. But in laptops, its implementation has been somewhat delayed. It is understandable. The screen sizes (and the production technology itself) are incomparable. But in the 2021 model, this option has been implemented. This is a very useful feature that changes the color temperature of the display depending on the lighting conditions. However, when working in Photoshop or when processing video, it is recommended to disable this option, as it does not allow you to see the true color of the image.
Overall, the display on the MacBook Pro has always been on point. But in recent versions it has become even better (if, of course, this is possible). Now working with laptops from Apple is a real pleasure. The screen instantly adjusts to the lighting conditions and gives the correct temperature. Well, isn’t it a miracle? Add to this excellent color reproduction, minimal response time and deep blacks. Such high-quality displays are definitely not in any laptop from competitors.
Design
The design of the MacBook Air 2021 is a hybrid between the original MBA and the MacBook Pro. “Air” in 2021 is very similar to the familiar Air… with one exception – the bezels around the screen have become much smaller. And this is already characteristic of the “pro” versions of the latest generations.
BY TOPIC: iPad Pro 2021 Review: Design, Performance, Cameras and Pricing.
Color
The 2021 MacBook Air is available in three colors: Gold, Silver and Space Gray, while the MacBook Pro is only available in Silver and Space Gray.
BY TOPIC: Which iPhone has the best battery life? Comparison of battery life of all current iPhones.
Weight
The new MacBook Air is slightly lighter than the MacBook Pro.
The 2021 Air weighs 1.25 kg, the MacBook Pro weighs 1.37 kg. In other words, the difference between them is minimal, and the 13.3-inch Pro version can also be called “light”.
Note that the old Air weighed 1.35 kg. So Apple engineers have something to be proud of — they made their lightest 13-inch laptop even lighter.
BY TOPIC: Cheap iPhones — what models and where to buy them.
Thickness
The MacBook Pro is thinner than the Air (in some places). At its widest point, the new Air is thicker than the Pro — 1.56 cm versus 1.49 cm. But in general, of course, the “air” laptop is thinner than the “professional”.
BY TOPIC: Which is better to buy — Mac mini 2021 or iMac 2021? Detailed comparison.
Butterfly keyboard is quieter
Strictly speaking, the MacBook Pro’s keyboard wasn’t particularly loud before, but now it’s barely audible at all. Such an achievement became possible due to a fundamentally new design of the key switches. Now the design of the «butterfly» type is used. And between the button and the switch itself there is a rubber membrane that dampens clicks. Otherwise, almost nothing has changed. But using the keyboard has become even more convenient. Precise button presses, instant response, low noise level are its key features.
The keyboard also has an adaptive backlight for each key. The light sensor is responsible for the correct brightness of this backlight. And he is excellent at his job. Many people think that the MacBook keyboard is too low. But those who have never used a MacBook Pro say so. Then they would understand that the keyboard is one of the best Apple designs for their laptops. No wonder writers and professional journalists prefer these laptops for work. And the opinion of such authoritative comrades is very important, since they will not be scattered just like that.
Heat: or no heat
The fan on the 13″ MacBook Pro 2021 could have made a loud noise when I provoked it, but it never did, and the laptop didn’t get hot. After watching HD video streaming for 15 minutes, we measured the temperature in three different places, the laptop remained cool. In the area of the touchpad, the device recorded a temperature of 30 degrees. Between the G and H keys, the temperature was 34 degrees. And on the bottom cover 33.5 degrees. All these results did not exceed the maximum allowable threshold of 35 degrees, beyond which it will not be comfortable to use a laptop.
Pro 2021’s new trackpad is bigger and smarter
And it really is. The new MacBook trackpad takes up the lion’s share of the space below the keyboard. Such dimensions are fully justified, because it is much more convenient to use the touch pad. Yes, and gestures have become much better. But this is not the most important thing. Now, those gestures that are used in the branded Magic Mouse mouse have been added to the supported gestures. So the trackpad has become almost a full-fledged mouse. But still, it takes some skill to work with it.
However, the updated trackpad is a plus. No well-known laptop from another manufacturer has this component as rich in functionality as the MacBook Pro. Strictly speaking, you don’t even need a mouse to use a Macbook. Those who are used to controlling a laptop using a trackpad say that they are already uncomfortable with a mouse. And they are quite understandable. So the touch pad is a definite plus of the updated laptop. Improved controls always improve the device.
8th Gen Intel Core i5 7267U — Only the iMac Pro is more powerful
Now we’ve got to the fun part. Up to the performance of new laptops. If you look exclusively at synthetic tests, it turns out that only the iconic iMac Pro, which is actively used in the film industry and NASA, is more powerful than the new laptops. The question is, why does a laptop need such power? Don’t forget that MacBook Pro owners perform very complex tasks on their devices (for example, video processing). And this requires quite serious hardware power. However, let’s take a closer look at the key components of the laptop.
Processor
The base version of the MacBook pro is equipped with an eighth generation Intel Core i5 7267U. This «stone» boasts incredible performance and excellent energy efficiency. The processor has four cores running at 2.2 GHz. This is quite enough for almost all tasks. But the processor also has a Turbo mode, which accelerates the chip to 4 GHz. This is also a lot. At the same time, the processor has 8 virtual threads, which increases its performance.
RAM
The RAM in the basic version of the laptop is represented by an LPDDR4X module operating at a frequency of 2400 MHz. This is a noticeable improvement, since LPDDR3X-type «bars» were previously used. The fourth series is much faster. In the initial configuration, the amount of RAM is 8 gigabytes. But you can order a special version with 32 GB of RAM on board. However, it will be very expensive. For the average user, 8 GB is enough. Moreover, this volume is sufficient for almost all known problems.
Internal storage
MacBooks have been using SSDs for a long time. They are much more productive than classic hard drives. But they also cost significantly more. The base MacBook Pro uses a high-performance 128 GB SSD. But there are versions with 256 and 521 GB on board. One more thing. On request, a new laptop can install a drive with a capacity of 1, 2, 3 and 4 terabytes. These are incredible volumes. But be aware that the 2021 MacBook Pro with 4 terabytes of space will cost unimaginable money. 9Ol000 no complaints
- Drive speed
- 3DMark Fire Strike
- Battery life
For anyone who works on a 2021 MacBook Pro every day and finds it painful to watch the spinning “beach swords” while doing heavy tasks, I’m happy to report that the 2021 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (starting at 179$9) has a serious performance boost that I’ve been missing for so long.
The 8th Gen Core i7 processor, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD configuration we reviewed is likely overkill, as it already costs an obscenely high $2,499. But you forget about the cost very quickly when you start using this laptop. We are talking about the fastest SSD ever installed in laptops. The test results put most Windows laptops to shame and kneel.
In other words, the 2108 MacBook Pro is a minor update, including a quieter keyboard, “Hey Siri” support, and a True Tone display. Overall, the 2021 13-inch MacBook Pro is very responsive, but unfortunately it’s not all that smooth as the battery life isn’t up to par.
Apple has identified a software bug in the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pro 2021 that could affect performance during long workloads and lead to throttling. After that, the company released a software update, and the performance indicators improved.
Wireless Wi-Fi connections with AirPlay option
The MacBook Pro 2021 is fine with that. Wireless communication is carried out using an advanced Wi-Fi adapter that can work in three bands. This allows you to provide incredibly high data transfer speeds when connected to the Internet. But for this you need a router that can work in just such ranges. Without this, nothing will come of it. By the way, with the help of the built-in Wi-Fi adapter, the AirPlay option also works, which allows you to broadcast an image on Apple monitor without wires.
The
Bluetooth transmitter is a version 5.0 adapter with support for AptX, AptX HD and AVCHD codecs. With this adapter, you can connect wireless headphones to your laptop and enjoy high-quality sound. But it is necessary that the headphones also support such technologies. Otherwise, the sound will be the most common. Also, using a Bluetooth adapter, you can connect various mice, keyboards and other similar devices to the laptop. And all this is done very quickly.
Graphics: Could be better
Arguably the weakest point of the 2018 13-inch MacBook Pro is its graphics. On the OpenGL component of the Cinebench R15 test, it delivered 41.1 frames per second. Dell XPS 13 showed 49.9 fps.
In Dirt 3, the Iris Plus 655 graphics card installed in the MacBook showed 46.9 fps, at medium settings and a resolution of 1600×1050 pixels. You can get a laptop with more powerful graphics — Nvidia MX150, such as Huawei MateBook X Pro or Asus ZenBook 13, which delivers more than 110 frames per second.
3DMark Fire Strike
GPU Performance Test
1898
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar (2018) intel Core i7-8559U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 / 2560×1440 (Q9HD)
2 160002 Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar (2017) Intel Core i5-7267U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
1425
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch (2017) Intel Core i5-7360U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
1177
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon (6th Gen) Intel Core i7-8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
1174
Dell XPS 13 (9370) Intel Core i7-8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 2560×1440 (QHD) 620 / 3840×2160 (4K UHD)
1174
Dell XPS 13 (9370) Intel Core i5-8250U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 1920×1080 (FHD)
1 Carbon66
3
i5-8250U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 1920×1080 (FHD)
JetStream
Test focused on the most advanced web applications.
305
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar (2018) intel Core i7-8559U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
263
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon (6th Gen) Intel Core i7- 8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
236
Dell XPS 13 (9370) Intel Core i7-8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 3840×2160 (4K UHD)
218
Apple MacBook 9 13-inch (2017) Intel Core i5-7360U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
211
Dell XPS 13 (9370) Intel Core i5-8250U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 1920×1080 (FHD)
208
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon (6th Gen) Intel Core i5-82 Graphics 62 / Intel UHD 1920×1080 (FHD)
201
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar (2017) Intel Core i5-7267U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
Touch Bar. The Function Key Alternative
The 2021 MacBook Pro 13 has a Touch Bar for a reason. Apple has long nurtured the idea of replacing the function buttons on the keyboard and came up with this solution. The Touch Bar is a touch panel that displays exactly the buttons that are needed for a particular application (currently running). Professionals have already noted the ergonomics of this panel, saying that programming the most used Photoshop buttons with it is a piece of cake. And the speed of work in the graphic editor noticeably increases.
There is one more feature of this panel. It has built-in Touch ID. This is the fingerprint scanner that was used in past Macbooks. It allows you to securely protect your device. No one except the owner can turn it on. In general, the touchbar is a very good thing. And if earlier the applications that support this option were like a cat crying, now the list is quite impressive. You can easily feel the beauty of working with touch-sensitive function keys. Apple definitely knows a lot about innovation.
MacBook
macworld.com
Next in line is the MacBook. Just a MacBook.
If the MacBook Air is compact, then the MacBook is tiny. It weighs 900 grams, sometimes you check if you forgot to take it with you. Smaller than the 12.9-inch iPad Pro. Such super-mobility makes it indispensable for business trips and traveling. You can comfortably work in a train, car — yes, anywhere.
The screen on the MacBook is excellent and second only to the Pro models. Diagonal — 12 inches, resolution — 2304 × 1440 pixels, thin frames around. The picture is bright and rich, watching movies and editing photos is a pleasure. It is curious that the baby has an impressive autonomy — an average of 8-9hours. During the working day, you can forget about the outlet.
The MacBook is passively cooled. There are no coolers, so it works silently. Heats up slightly, only in the most resource-intensive applications.
MacBook is the first Apple laptop to feature a butterfly keyboard. I got used to it quickly, I like the small key travel, and now it’s inconvenient to work on another keyboard. It seems like the fingers are falling through.
thenextweb.com
When Apple introduced the first generation of the MacBook in 2015, many didn’t take it seriously. Small, weak processor, only one USB-C port. «Dear typewriter» — that’s what they called it. For me, it was the main computer that handled all the tasks. I often went on business trips, wrote posts on the road, processed photos.
Sure, it was slower than the MacBook Pro, but this is where size matters. In 2021, the third generation was introduced with two processors — the mobile m3 and the «adult» i5. The laptop noticeably increased in speed and learned to easily cope with heavy software.
I solved the single port problem by purchasing a 27″ monitor with USB-C. On the road, the laptop remains small and convenient, and at home I work in front of a large screen. I connect the peripherals directly to the monitor, for this there is a pair of USB. In the process, the monitor also charges the MacBook. All this through a single USB-C port — here it is, the wireless future.
The only drawback of the MacBook is its high price. It costs like a MacBook Pro 13 without Touch Bar. If performance and number of ports are more important, pay attention to it.
If you’re looking for a laptop that’s mobile, nimble, and beautiful, the MacBook is the way to go.
New MacBook Pro 2021 record holders in autonomy
And this is the absolute truth. The laptop is equipped with a Li-Pol battery with a capacity of 7500 mAh and a power of 58 W / h. But it’s not about capacity or power. A lot also depends on the battery, but the main thing here is the processor and other energy-efficient components of the hardware platform. It is they who allow the laptop to work for as long as 6.5 hours under maximum load. And if you just watch movies or surf the Internet, then the battery life increases to 12 hours. And these are truly incredible results.
It is worth noting that exactly the same autonomy is observed in the top configuration of the MacBook Pro 2021 with Intel Core i9 on board. This processor is not only unrealistically powerful, it is also incredibly energy efficient. Therefore, the battery life does not change one iota. In fact, everyone knows perfectly well that MacBooks are the most enduring laptops in the world. No laptop with Windows on board can match this indicator with a MacBook. This suggests that the Mac OS used in Apple laptops also has some kind of optimization.
Lineup
If major updates from Apple really happen rarely, then the hardware still receives light updates once a year. This time they touched the screen, keyboard and «stuffing». Externally, the computer has not changed at all. In this design, the MacBook Pro, apparently, will be another two years. But judging by the news, soon we will have an update to the MacBook Air and Mac Mini.
As for the “tag”, 6-core processors appeared even in the base, and the most expensive equipment offers a processor up to Intel Core i9, the ability to increase the amount of RAM up to 32 GB and storage up to 4 TB. True, the cost of such pleasure is slightly sky-high — $ 6699, where the lion’s share of the price tag is the drive.
Apple MacBook Pro 2021 Package Contents
That’s the only thing that hasn’t changed in the new MacBook Pro. It also comes in a compact white cardboard box. On the front there is a colorful image of a laptop. There is even a barely noticeable perforation. This box is one of the pillars of Apple’s image. They even have conceptual and cool packaging. And what is inside the box?
- Apple MacBook Pro 2018;
- Charging cable;
- Charger unit itself;
- Plug for power supply;
- Required number of information leaflets;
- Instruction manual;
- Warranty card.
Not so much. But what, pray tell, can be put in a box with a laptop? Mouse? Although some kind of bonus for that kind of money would not hurt. Nevertheless, even such a package for some users is a joy. The main thing is that there is a brand new and fully functional Macbook. And everything else is not so important. At least for those who really appreciate Apple technology and are not distracted by unnecessary accessories.
Ports: Thunderbolt only
If you’re looking for a laptop with a full-size USB port or microSD card slot, then the MacBook isn’t for you. Apple continues to include four Thunderbolt 3 ports on the 13-inch MacBook Pro Touch Bar.
These ports provide high bandwidth and allow you to connect up to two 4K monitors at the same time. According to Apple, there are already more than 300 different accessories on the market that support Thunderbolt 3.
Verdict
So, let’s summarize all the above information. What can be said in general terms about the 2021 MacBook Pro? We can safely say that some models are real works of art. In particular, this applies to the option with a screen diagonal of 15 inches and top filling. However, this laptop (like any other) has its drawbacks and advantages. It is worth considering them in more detail. This will summarize all the above material. Let’s start with the benefits.
Pros
- Incredible performance;
- Reference design;
- Improved performance;
- Updated keyboard;
- Improved trackpad;
- Gorgeous screen;
- Record-breaking battery life;
- Traditional build quality;
- Availability of innovations;
- New Touch Bar;
- True Tone support.
Display: TrueTone value
At first glance, the 13-inch display of the new 2018 MacBook Pro looks the same as the previous version of the laptop. But with True Tone turned on, the screen becomes more pleasing to the eye. The laptop is equipped with a special sensor that allows the system to dynamically change the white balance of the display according to the color temperature of the lighting.
As a result, the picture may be slightly yellowish, for example, it is noticeable when working with Google Docs, but this provides a more comfortable viewing. If this bothers you, you can disable this feature in the system settings. In all other respects, the Retina Display of the new MacBook has the same characteristics as its predecessor.
In our test, the 13-inch MacBook Pro 2021 showed 119% of the sRGB color spectrum.
Color gamut
Color gamut (% sRGB)
199
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon (6th Gen) Intel Core i7-8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
130 9002 Dell XPS 13 (9370) Intel Core i7-8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 3840×2160 (4K UHD)
129
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon (6th Gen) Intel Core i5-8250U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 1920×1080 (FHD)
123
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar (2017) Intel Core i5-7267U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
119
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Bar (2018) intel Core i7-8559U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
117
100
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch (2017) Intel Core i5-7360U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
Display brightness
Maximum display brightness (cd/m2)
561
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch (2017) Intel Core i5-7360U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
463 9002 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon (6th Gen) Intel Core i7-8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
458
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar (2017) Intel Core i5-7267U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
439
Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Touch Bar (2018) intel Core i7-8559U / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 / 2560×1440 (QHD)
415
Dell XPS 13 (9370) Intel Core i7-8550U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 3840×2160 (4K UHD)
372
Dell XPS 13 (9370) Intel Core i5-8250U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 1920×1080 (FHD)
293 Carbon
Intel (Lenovo Core Genth6) ThinkPad X1 i5-8250U / Intel UHD Graphics 620 / 1920×1080 (FHD)
specs and tests in 46 games and 18 benchmarks
Intel started selling the Iris Plus Graphics 655 on April 3, 2018. This is a graphics card for laptops, based on the Generation 9.5 architecture, with a 14 nm process technology. It does not have its own memory and uses the system memory, so the performance depends on the characteristics of the RAM.
Connected via the Ring Bus interface. Power is not specified, the declared maximum power consumption is 15 watts.
Specifications
GPU
- Architecture
- Generation 9.5
- Manufacturer
- Intel
- Process
- 14 nm
Graphic card
- Release date
- April 3, 2018
- Generation
- HD Graphics-M (Coffee Lake)
- Data bus interface
- Ring Bus
Frequencies
- Base frequency
- 300 MHz
- Boost frequency
- 1050 MHz
- Memory frequency
- Uses system
Memory
- Memory capacity
- Uses system
- Memory type
- Uses system
- Memory bus
- Uses system
- Memory bandwidth
- Uses system
Learn more about memory usage of the integrated video card, how to increase or decrease the amount and where to view it.
Render configuration
- Shader units
- 384
- Compute modules
- 48
- Texture blocks
- 48
- Raster blocks
- 6
Rated output
- Pixel fill rate
- 6.300 HP/s
- Texture Fill Rate
- 50.40 GT/s
- Performance FP16
- 1.613 Tflops
- Performance FP32
- 806.4 GFlops
- Performance FP64
- 201.6 GFlops
Graphics
- DirectX
- 12 (12_1)
- OpenGL
- 4.
6
- OpenCL
- 3
- Vulkan
- 1.2
- Shader model
- 6.4
Graphics Card Design
- Heat Sink Requirements
- 15W
- Outlets
- None
Game FPS
Metro Exodus
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.
|
1280×720 / Low / 18.3 |
Red Dead Redemption 2
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX110, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
|
1280×720 / Low / 15.8 |
Overwatch
(2016)
Better than AMD Radeon R9M375, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 5.
|
1280×720 / Low / 91 |
1366×768 / Medium / 68 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 29.9 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 18.2 |
Grand Theft Auto V
(2015)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940M, but worse than AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8.
|
1024×768 / Low / 64.5 |
1366×768 / Medium / 56.95 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 14.75 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 5.86 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 4.17 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
(2012)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, but worse than AMD Radeon 540X.
|
1366×768 / Tall / 93. |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 49.6 |
3820×2160 / Ultra / 12.4 |
The Witcher 3
(2015)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 830M, but worse than AMD FirePro W4100.
|
1024×768 / Low / 24.7 |
1366×768 / Medium / 14.6 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 10.9 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 5. |
Gears Tactics
(2020)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.
|
1280×720 / Low / 54.8 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 17.3 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 11.6 |
GRID 2019
(2019)
Better than AMD Radeon 530, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX.
|
1280×720 / Low / 36.3 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 20. |
Borderlands 3
(2019)
Better than AMD Radeon 530, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX.
|
1280×720 / Low / 23.5 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 10.2 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 6.4 |
Control
(2019)
Better than AMD Radeon 530, but worse than AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8.
|
1280×720 / Low / 25.4 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX230.
|
1280×720 / Low / 56.7 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 18.5 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 10.5 |
Rage 2
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX230, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
|
1280×720 / Low / 24.5 |
Anno 1800
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.
|
1280×720 / Low / 30. |
The Division 2
(2019)
Better than AMD Radeon 540X, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000).
|
1280×720 / Low / 35 |
Dirt Rally 2.0
(2019)
Better than Intel UHD Graphics 630, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 64 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 22.8 |
Far Cry New Dawn
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX110, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX.
|
1280×720 / Low / 22 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 11 |
Battlefield V
(2018)
Better than AMD Radeon R5 M255, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
|
1280×720 / Low / 19.9 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
(2018)
Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.
|
1280×720 / Low / 15.5 |
Forza Horizon 4
(2018)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 920M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 25 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
(2018)
Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 21.25 |
Far Cry 5
(2018)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 930M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX110.
|
1280×720 / Low / 21.5 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 10.5 |
X-Plane 11. 11
(2018)
Better than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 25.3 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 18 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 15.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
(2018)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 15.6 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 8. |
1920×1080 / Tall / 5.65 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider
(2016)
Better than AMD Radeon 530, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
|
1024×768 / Low / 32.55 |
1366×768 / Medium / 19.95 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 10.8 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 8.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn
(2015)
Better than AMD Radeon 530, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX.
|
1280×720 / Low / 90.25 |
1366×768 / Medium / 63.5 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 32.15 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 27.9 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 11.9 |
Escape from Tarkov
(2020)
Better than Intel UHD Graphics 620, but worse than AMD Radeon 530.
|
1280×720 / Low / 29. |
1920×1080 / Medium / 16.2 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 14.1 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 6.59 |
FIFA 20
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX110, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 5.
|
1280×720 / Low / 92 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 55.9 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 46. |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 34.9 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 26.5 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 13.6 |
F1 2019
(2019)
Better than AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 5.
|
1280×720 / Low / 51.2 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 21.9 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 19. |
Anthem
(2019)
Better than Intel UHD Graphics 630, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.
|
1280×720 / Low / 16.6 |
FIFA 19
(2018)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX230, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 940M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 82 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 45.8 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 40.3 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 36. |
F1 2018
(2018)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX130.
|
1280×720 / Low / 45 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 23 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 17 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 12 |
The Crew 2
(2018)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 930M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX.
|
1280×720 / Low / 30. |
World of Tanks enCore
(2018)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 5500, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
|
1366×768 / Low / 132.85 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 40.3 |
Fortnite
(2018)
Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) but worse than Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
|
1280×720 / Low / 51.5 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 21. |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War
(2017)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 930M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX230.
|
1280×720 / Low / 30 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 18 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 14 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 9 |
Team Fortress 2
(2017)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.
|
1280×720 / Low / 128 |
1366×768 / Medium / 125 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 113 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 57.8 |
3820×2160 / Ultra / 34.4 |
Rocket League
(2017)
Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 920MX.
|
1280×720 / Low / 115. |
1920×1080 / Medium / 49.85 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 35.75 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands
(2017)
Better than Intel UHD Graphics 630, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.
|
1280×720 / Low / 21.55 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 10.2 |
For Honor
(2017)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 930M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX.
|
1280×720 / Low / 41.3 |
1920×1080 / Medium / 16.1 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided
(2016)
Better than Intel Iris Graphics 550, but worse than AMD Radeon R9 M280X.
|
1280×720 / Low / 28.7 |
1366×768 / Medium / 21.1 |
Ashes of the Singularity
(2016)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX130.
|
1280×768 / Low / 19. |
1920×1080 / Medium / 11.3 |
1920×1080 / Tall / 10.5 |
The Division
(2016)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 34.2 |
1366×768 / Medium / 21.2 |
Rainbow Six Siege
(2015)
Better than AMD Radeon R9M385X, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX.
|
1024×768 / Low / 75. |
BioShock Infinite
(2013)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, but worse than AMD Radeon 530.
|
1280×720 / Low / 97.5 |
1366×768 / Medium / 59.55 |
1366×768 / Tall / 52.2 |
1920×1080 / Ultra / 16.25 9129four |
Assassin´s Creed Origins
(2017)
Better than AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), but worse than AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3.
|
1280×720 / Low / 13 |
Hearthstone
(2020)
Better than AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q.
|
1920×1080 / Tall / 59.8 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 27.2 |
Benchmark tests
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 15171 Better than AMD Radeon 540X but worse than Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 11714 Better than AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 2037 Better than AMD Radeon R9 M265X but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460.
3DMark Fire Strike Score: 1900.5 Better than AMD Radeon R9 M265X but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 143400 Better than AMD Radeon RX 540 but worse than Intel Iris Graphics 550.
3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 619 Better than Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX.
3DMark Time Spy Score: 705 Better than Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX.
3DMark Vantage P: 12093 Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX130, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7850M.
3DMark06: 17176 Better than AMD FirePro M6000 but worse than AMD Radeon HD 6970M.
3DMark11 P: 3330 Better than AMD Radeon HD 8870M, but worse than AMD FirePro M5100.
3DMark11 P GPU: 3044 Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7770.
Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 9184.5 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile.
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 79.76 Better than AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 11.
ComputeMark v2.1 Normal, Score: 1841 Better than AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 940MX.
GFXBench: 6375.2 Better than NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU.
GFXBench 3.0 1080p Manhattan Offscreen: 199.6 Better than AMD Radeon RX 480 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX450.
GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen OGL: 199.6 Better than AMD Radeon RX 480 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX450.
GFXBench 3.1 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen: 2386.9 Better than AMD Radeon 625.