Radeon 5700 vs vega 64: RX 5700 vs RX Vega 64 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-7700K)

Radeon RX 5700 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Home
VGA Benchmarks
Radeon RX 5700 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Radeon RX 5700

110%
Radeon RX Vega 64

100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5700

10% higher gaming performance.

115 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX Vega 64 .

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Supports FreeSync

Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 64

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Supports FreeSync

Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports TrueAudio

Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 5700

The Radeon RX 5700 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (69 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration

	Radeon RX 5700		Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU Name	Navi 10 (Navi 10 Pro)	vs	Vega 10 (Vega 10 XT)
Fab Process	7 nm	vs	14 nm
Die Size	254 mmÂ²	vs	484 mmÂ²
Transistors	unknown	vs	12,500 million
Shaders	2304	vs	4096
Compute Units	36	vs	64
Core clock	1465 MHz	vs	1250 MHz
ROPs	64	vs	64
TMUs	256	vs	256

Memory Configuration

	Radeon RX 5700		Radeon RX Vega 64
Memory Type	GDDR6	vs	HBM2
Bus Width	256 bit	vs	2048 bit
Memory Speed	1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective	vs	945 MHz 1890 MHz effective
Memory Size	8192 Mb	vs	8192 Mb

Additional details

	Radeon RX 5700		Radeon RX Vega 64
TDP	180 watts	vs	295 watts
Release Date	7 Jul 2019	vs	8 Aug 2017

Radeon RX 5700

104. 00 GP/s
Radeon RX Vega 64

96.00 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

Radeon RX 5700

416.00 GT/s
Radeon RX Vega 64

384.00 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

Radeon RX 5700

448.00 GB/s
Radeon RX Vega 64

483.80 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

Radeon RX 5700

7480.00 GFLOPs
Radeon RX Vega 64

12288.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

74
Radeon RX Vega 64

60

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

125
Radeon RX Vega 64

115

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

78
Radeon RX Vega 64

66

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

117
Radeon RX Vega 64

108

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

149
Radeon RX Vega 64

101

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

Radeon RX 5700

58
Radeon RX Vega 64

48

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

145
Radeon RX Vega 64

121

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

123
Radeon RX Vega 64

115

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

102
Radeon RX Vega 64

100

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

93
Radeon RX Vega 64

82

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

113
Radeon RX Vega 64

114

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

104
Radeon RX Vega 64

88

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

Radeon RX 5700

135
Radeon RX Vega 64

126

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

167
Radeon RX Vega 64

142

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

67
Radeon RX Vega 64

61

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

42
Radeon RX Vega 64

36

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

104
Radeon RX Vega 64

100

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

66
Radeon RX Vega 64

60

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

134
Radeon RX Vega 64

134

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

106
Radeon RX Vega 64

90

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

131
Radeon RX Vega 64

137

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

Radeon RX 5700

108
Radeon RX Vega 64

103

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

65
Radeon RX Vega 64

58

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

56
Radeon RX Vega 64

48

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

98
Radeon RX Vega 64

89

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

57
Radeon RX Vega 64

49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

89
Radeon RX Vega 64

84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

110
Radeon RX Vega 64

81

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

Radeon RX 5700

36
Radeon RX Vega 64

32

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

104
Radeon RX Vega 64

86

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

98
Radeon RX Vega 64

84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

82
Radeon RX Vega 64

74

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

69
Radeon RX Vega 64

61

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

92
Radeon RX Vega 64

89

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

73
Radeon RX Vega 64

62

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

Radeon RX 5700

115
Radeon RX Vega 64

91

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

115
Radeon RX Vega 64

94

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

53
Radeon RX Vega 64

49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

35
Radeon RX Vega 64

28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

71
Radeon RX Vega 64

72

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

52
Radeon RX Vega 64

48

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

87
Radeon RX Vega 64

92

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

70
Radeon RX Vega 64

61

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

98
Radeon RX Vega 64

100

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

Radeon RX 5700

74
Radeon RX Vega 64

79

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

47
Radeon RX Vega 64

43

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

30
Radeon RX Vega 64

29

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

54
Radeon RX Vega 64

52

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

30
Radeon RX Vega 64

28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

51
Radeon RX Vega 64

50

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

62
Radeon RX Vega 64

51

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

Radeon RX 5700

17
Radeon RX Vega 64

16

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

54
Radeon RX Vega 64

47

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

55
Radeon RX Vega 64

50

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

41
Radeon RX Vega 64

38

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

39
Radeon RX Vega 64

35

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

50
Radeon RX Vega 64

49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

35
Radeon RX Vega 64

34

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

Radeon RX 5700

56
Radeon RX Vega 64

49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

61
Radeon RX Vega 64

48

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

32
Radeon RX Vega 64

32

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

18
Radeon RX Vega 64

16

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

41
Radeon RX Vega 64

43

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

31
Radeon RX Vega 64

31

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

44
Radeon RX Vega 64

46

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

Radeon RX 5700

35
Radeon RX Vega 64

31

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

60
Radeon RX Vega 64

61

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

Radeon RX 5700

40
Radeon RX Vega 64

44

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

Radeon RX 5700

27
Radeon RX Vega 64

25

FPS (higher is better)

	VS
Radeon RX 5700	VS	Radeon RX 6650 XT

	VS
Radeon RX 5700	VS	GeForce RTX 2060 Super

	VS
Radeon RX Vega 64	VS	Radeon RX 6650 XT

	VS
Radeon RX Vega 64	VS	GeForce RTX 2060 Super

	VS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super	VS	Radeon RX 5700 XT

	VS
Radeon RX 5700 XT	VS	Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT: What is the difference?

44points

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

57points

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 better than HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT?

2.85 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
12.6 TFLOPSvs9.75 TFLOPS
91 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
395.8 GTexels/svs304.8 GTexels/s
35.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
483.8GB/svs448GB/s
1792bit wider memory bus width?
2048bitvs256bit
1536 more shading units?
4096vs2560
2200million more transistors?
12500 millionvs10300 million
96 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
256vs160

Why is HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

358MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1605MHzvs1247MHz
22. 96 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
121.9 GPixel/svs98.94 GPixel/s
70W lower TDP?
225Wvs295W
805MHz faster memory clock speed?
1750MHzvs945MHz
12110MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
14000MHzvs1890MHz
359MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1905MHzvs1546MHz
7nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs14nm
1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
4vs3

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Asus ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon RX 580X

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Super XC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Mech 2X

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon Vega 8

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 OC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

1247MHz

1605MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1546MHz

1905MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

98.94 GPixel/s

121.9 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

12.6 TFLOPS

9.75 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

395.8 GTexels/s

304.8 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

945MHz

1750MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

1890MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2. maximum memory bandwidth

483.8GB/s

448GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

2048bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9. PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

RX Vega 64 vs RX 5700 XT ⚙️

0x1015652490.633MH/s175W89442.804MH/W

Argon2d-dyn33.945KH/s124W0.274KH/W

Argon2d-ninja0KH/s191W0KH/W

Argon2d409657.791KH/s—W—KH/W

Astralhash21.53MH/s183W0.118MH/W

Autolykos290.374MH/s108W0.837MH/W

BCD15.389MH/s181W0. 085MH/W

BMW512776.76MH/s85W9.138MH/W

BeamHashII30.357H/s109W0.279H/W

BeamHashIII24.4H/s121W0.202H/W

Blake (2b)1.484GH/s86W0.017GH/W

Blake (2s)4.515GH/s164W0.028GH/W

Blake (2s-Kadena)—GH/s—W—GH/W

C1118.444MH/s123W0.15MH/W

CNReverseWaltz1465.64H/s147W9.97H/W

Chukwa80.217KH/s179W0.448KH/W

Chukwa230.116KH/s189W0. 159KH/W

Circcash1460.498KH/s169W8.642KH/W

CryptoNightAlloy562.77H/s141W3.991H/W

CryptoNightArto1122.93H/s142W7.908H/W

CryptoNightConceal2275.1H/s147W15.477H/W

CryptoNightFast50537.857H/s191W264.596H/W

CryptoNightFastV2—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightGPU1938H/s90W21.533H/W

CryptoNightHaven1293.56H/s82W15.775H/W

CryptoNightHeavy51113.5H/s188W271.88H/W

CryptoNightHeavyX568. 47H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightLiteV751.11KH/s188W0.272KH/W

CryptoNightR1062.73H/s180W5.904H/W

CryptoNightSaber—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV41182.1H/s142W8.325H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV52110.3H/s200W10.552H/W

CryptoNightTalleo0.01MH/s27W0MH/W

CryptoNightTurtle9.582KH/s193W0.05KH/W

CryptoNightUPX2—KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightV71.182KH/s143W0. 008KH/W

CryptoNightV81084H/s168W6.452H/W

CryptoNightWOW1097.9H/s88W12.476H/W

CryptoNightZLS1443.385H/s99W14.58H/W

Cuckaroo29S4.2H/s194W0.022H/W

Cuckaroo29b3.797H/s108W0.035H/W

CuckooBFC—H/s—W—H/W

CuckooCycle4.48H/s180W0.025H/W

Curvehash3947981765469.3H/s66W59817905537.414H/W

Darkcoin1.913GH/s180W0.011GH/W

Dedal14.49MH/s195W0. 074MH/W

Eaglesong0.753GH/s190W0.004GH/W

Equihash(125,4)32.46H/s168W0.193H/W

Equihash(144,5)56.51H/s200W0.283H/W

Equihash(150,5)—H/s—W—H/W

Equihash(192,7)35H/s179W0.196H/W

Equihash(210,9)178.24H/s160W1.114H/W

Equihash(96,5)—H/s—W—H/W

Etchash54.282MH/s91W0.597MH/W

Ethash54.282MH/s91W0.597MH/W

FiroPoW23.48MH/s121W0. 194MH/W

Globalhash19.149MH/s173W0.111MH/W

HMQ17258.901MH/s169W0.053MH/W

Handshake0.197GH/s100W0.002GH/W

HeavyHash211.874MH/s109W1.944MH/W

Hex11.654MH/s198W0.059MH/W

HoneyComb29.678MH/s170W0.175MH/W

Jeonghash7.61MH/s184W0.041MH/W

KAWPOW26.19MH/s141W0.186MH/W

KangarooTwelve1.437GH/s180W0.008GH/W

Lyra2REv253.191MH/s152W0. 35MH/W

Lyra2REv371.694MH/s179W0.401MH/W

Lyra2vc0ban61.271MH/s179W0.342MH/W

Lyra2z—MH/s—W—MH/W

MTP2.261MH/s111W0.02MH/W

Octopus22.34MH/s210W0.106MH/W

PHI161222.659MH/s194W0.117MH/W

PHI2—MH/s—W—MH/W

Padihash11.986MH/s196W0.061MH/W

Pawelhash8.995MH/s180W0.05MH/W

Phi56.866H/s192W0.036H/W

ProgPow16. 427MH/s180W0.091MH/W

ProgPowSERO16.96MH/s195W0.087MH/W

ProgPowZ17.498MH/s179W0.098MH/W

RandomKEVA1013.96H/s164W6.183H/W

RandomSFX1012.975H/s164W6.177H/W

RandomX—H/s—W—H/W

SHA-256csm1644.847MH/s179W9.189MH/W

Skein2546.626MH/s194W2.818MH/W

Skunkhash43.05MH/s172W0.25MH/W

SonoA2.252MH/s174W0.013MH/W

Tellor0. 193GH/s—W—GH/W

TimeTravel1037.07MH/s194W0.191MH/W

Tribus79.821MH/s189W0.422MH/W

Ubqhash49.708MH/s190W0.262MH/W

Verthash0.698MH/s163W0.004MH/W

VerusHash0.47MH/s140W0.003MH/W

X11k2.821MH/s192W0.015MH/W

X16R15.048MH/s194W0.078MH/W

X16RT14.873MH/s189W0.079MH/W

X16RTVEIL15.045MH/s185W0.081MH/W

X16Rv212. 778MH/s190W0.067MH/W

X16S15.021MH/s188W0.08MH/W

X1714.727MH/s181W0.081MH/W

X17R13.12MH/s192W0.068MH/W

X1810.69MH/s186W0.057MH/W

X21S9.026MH/s193W0.047MH/W

X22i3.291MH/s124W0.027MH/W

X25X1.587MH/s113W0.014MH/W

Xevan4.86MH/s189W0.026MH/W

Zhash56.38H/s159W0.355H/W

cuckARoo29—H/s—W—H/W

cuckARood294. 49H/s128W0.035H/W

cuckARoom291.26H/s108W0.012H/W

cuckAToo310.4H/s84W0.005H/W

cuckAToo320.19H/s110W0.002H/W

vProgPow8.041MH/s190W0.042MH/W

AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5700

Buy on Amazon

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1247 MHz
Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1546 MHz
Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 295 Watt
Around 13% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 920 vs 811
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.409 vs 195.478
Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3624.564 vs 2129.009
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.938 vs 14.889
Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 251.354 vs 129.271
Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 8496 vs 7554

Launch date	7 July 2019 vs 7 August 2017
Core clock speed	1465 MHz vs 1247 MHz
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz vs 1546 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt vs 295 Watt
PassMark — G2D Mark	920 vs 811
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	207.409 vs 195.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3624.564 vs 2129.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	21.938 vs 14.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	251.354 vs 129.271
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3723 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3366 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3723 vs 3717
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3366 vs 3358
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	8496 vs 7554

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

1593.4x more texture fill rate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
3.5x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 204168 vs 58932
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 vs 965.707
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 vs 11536
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 vs 11536

Texture fill rate	395.80 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
PassMark — G3D Mark	14652 vs 14621
Geekbench — OpenCL	204168 vs 58932
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1328.033 vs 965.707
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14744 vs 11536
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14744 vs 11536

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

204168

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

207.409

195.478

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3624.564

2129.009

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.

938

14.889

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

251.354

129.271

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

965.707

1328.

033

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.

0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5700	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark — G3D Mark	14621	14652
PassMark — G2D Mark	920	811
Geekbench — OpenCL	58932	204168
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	207.409	195.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3624.564	2129.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	21.938	14.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	251.354	129.271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	965.707	1328.033
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11536	14744
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3723	3717
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3366	3358
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11536	14744
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3723	3717
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3366	3358
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	8496	7554

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5700	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Architecture	RDNA	GCN 5. 0
Code name	Navi 10	Vega 10
Launch date	7 July 2019	7 August 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$350	$499
Place in performance rating	74	71
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Design		Radeon RX Vega Series
Price now		$449. 99
Value for money (0-100)		41.07
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	1546 MHz
Compute units	36	64
Core clock speed	1465 MHz	1247 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.9 TFLOPs	26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.95 TFLOPs	13.4 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate	110. 4 GP/s	98.90 GP/s
Render output units	64	64
Stream Processors	2304	4096
Texture fill rate	248.4 GT/s	395.80 GTexel/s
Texture Units	144	256
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt	295 Watt
Transistor count	10.3 B	12,500 million
Floating-point performance		12. 7 TFLOPs
Manufacturing process technology		14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance		840 GFLOPs
Pipelines		8192
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors		1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support
VGA
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin and 1×6 pin	2x 8-pin
Interface		PCIe 3. 0 x16
Length		279 mm
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan
OpenCL		2.0
OpenGL		4.5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	483.8 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	2048 bit
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory clock speed		1890 MHz
4K h364 Decode
4K h364 Encode
DisplayPort 1. 3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
h365/HEVC Decode
h365/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
PowerTune
TressFX
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
ZeroCore

Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs Radeon Pro Vega 64 Graphics cards Comparison

When choosing between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let’s find out the difference between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Radeon Pro Vega 64

Main Specs

	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	250 Watt
Interface	PCIe 4. 0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 92% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT is connected by PCIe 4.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have maximum RAM of 16 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT is build with RDNA 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 64 — with GCN 5.0.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 64 — by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 64 is 1560 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
QHD / 1440p	30−35	30−35
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	80−85	85−90
medium / 1080p	65−70	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
high / 1080p	85−90	90−95
ultra / 1080p	75−80	80−85
QHD / 1440p	60−65	60−65
4K / 2160p	30−35	30−35
low / 720p	140−150	140−150
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	230−240	230−240
QHD / 1440p	150−160	150−160
4K / 2160p	100−110	100−110
high / 768p	220−230	220−230
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	110−120	110−120
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	70−75	75−80
ultra / 1080p	65−70	70−75
QHD / 1440p	45−50	45−50
4K / 2160p	24−27	24−27
low / 720p	100−110	110−120
medium / 1080p	75−80	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
high / 1080p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	85−90
QHD / 1440p	50−55	55−60
4K / 2160p	21−24	21−24
low / 720p	230−240	230−240
medium / 1080p	150−160	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
high / 1080p	95−100	95−100
ultra / 1080p	75−80	75−80
QHD / 1440p	55−60	55−60
4K / 2160p	35−40	40−45
low / 720p	140−150	140−150
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
low / 768p	160−170	160−170
medium / 768p	150−160	150−160
high / 1080p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	55−60	55−60
QHD / 1440p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	60−65	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in Metro Exodus is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	90−95	95−100
ultra / 1080p	65−70	65−70
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	130−140	130−140
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
high / 1080p	40−45	40−45
ultra / 1080p	27−30	27−30
QHD / 1440p	21−24	21−24
4K / 2160p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	60−65	65−70
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	210−220	210−220
medium / 768p	140−150	140−150
high / 1080p	80−85	85−90
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
4K / 2160p	30−35	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 64 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 0% more, than Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
low / 768p	140−150	140−150
ultra / 1080p	70−75	70−75
Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro Vega 64 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 5.0
Code name	Navi 10	Vega 10
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 August 2020	27 June 2017
Pipelines	2560	4096
Core clock speed		1250 MHz
Boost Clock	1499 MHz	1350 MHz
Transistor count	10,300 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	239. 8	345.6
Floating-point performance		11,059 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	12 GB/s	1572 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	402.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.1.125

Similar compares

Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 980 mobile
Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs Quadro T1000 mobile
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 980 mobile
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Quadro T1000 mobile
Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs Apple M1 8 Core GPU
Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GeForce RTX 2060 mobile
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Apple M1 8 Core GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 2060 mobile

AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 5700 on one side and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2304 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,5 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card	AMD Radeon RX 5700	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	Q3 2019	Q3 2017
Model number	215-0917220, Navi 10 XL	215-0894200, Vega 10 XT
GPU name	Navi 10	Vega 10
Architecture	RDNA 1. 0	GCN 5.0
Generation	Navi RX 5000	RX Vega
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Transistors	10.300.000.000	12.500.000.000
Bus interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock	1,47 GHz	1,25 GHz
GPU boost clock	1,73 GHz	1,55 GHz
Memory frequency	1.750 MHz	945 MHz
Effective memory speed	14 GB/s	1,9 GB/s
Memory size	8 GB	8 GB
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory bus	256 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory bandwidth	448,0 GB/s	483,8 GB/s
TDP	180 W	295 W
Suggested PSU	450W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology	—	—
Outputs	1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
Maximum GPU Temperature	110°C	85°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)	36	64
Shading units	2. 304	4.096
TMUs	144	256
ROPs	64	64
Cache memory	4 MB	4 MB
Pixel fillrate	110,4 GP/s	98,9 GP/s
Texture fillrate	248,4 GT/s	395,8 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)	15,9 TFLOPS	25,3 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)	7,9 TFLOPS	12,7 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)	496,8 GFLOPS	791,6 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	12.660
AMD Radeon RX 5700	7.949

The difference is 59%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon RX 5700 Nvidia equivalentAMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nvidia equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

What is better than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 or HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

GPU

GPU graphic processor (GPU) is characterized frequency.

1605MHz

max 2457

Average: 938 MHz

1247MHz

max 2457

Average: 938 MHz

GPU memory frequency

This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

1750MHz

max 16000

Average: 1326. 6 MHz

945MHz

max 16000

Average: 1326.6 MHz

FLOPS

The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

9.45TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

12.8TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

Turbo GPU

If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

1905 MHz

max 2903

Average: 1375.8 MHz

1546 MHz

max 2903

Average: 1375. 8 MHz

Texture size

A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all

304.8 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

395.8 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

Architecture name

NAVI / RDNA

GCN 5.0

Graphic processor name

NAVI 10

VEGA 10

Passing capacity

This is the speed with which the device saves or reads information.

448GB/s

max 2656

Average: 198.3 GB/s

483. 8GB/s

max 2656

Average: 198.3 GB/s

Effective memory speed

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all

14000MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

1890MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

RAM

8GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

8GB

max 128

Average: 4. 6 GB

GDDR Memory Versions

Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all

Average: 4.5

Memory bus width

A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all

256bit

max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

2048bit

max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

Heat dissipation (TDP)

Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

225W

Average: 140.4 W

295W

Average: 140.4 W

Process technology

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

7 nm

Average: 47.5 nm

14 nm

Average: 47.5 nm

Number of transistors

The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

10300 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

12500 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

PCIe version

Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all

four

Mean: 2.8

Width

272mm

max 421.7

Average: 242.6mm

279mm

max 421.7

Average: 242.6mm

Height

111.2mm

max 180

Average: 119.1mm

max 180

Average: 119.1mm

DirectX

Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics

max 12. 2

Average: 11.1

max 12.2

Average: 11.1

OpenCL version

Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

max 4.6

Average: 1.7

2.1

max 4.6

Average: 1.7

opengl version

Later versions provide better game graphics

4.6

max 4.6

Average: 4

4.6

max 4. 6

Average: 4

Shader model version

6.5

max 6.6

Average: 5.5

6.4

max 6.6

Average: 5.5

Vulkan version

1.2

Has HDMI output

HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show all

Yes

HDMI version

The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all

max 2.1

Average: 2

max 2. 1

Average: 2

DisplayPort

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

Average: 2

Number of HDMI sockets

The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all

one

Average: 1.1

one

Average: 1.1

HDMI

Yes

Passmark score

16495

max 29325

Average: 7628. 6

14327

max 29325

Average: 7628.6

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

138294

max 1

Average: 80042.3

124827

max 1

Average: 80042.3

3DMark Fire Strike Score

21686

max 38276

Average: 12463

18001

max 38276

Average: 12463

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

24914

max 49575

Average: 11859. 1

22051

max 49575

Average: 11859.1

3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score

34866

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

30208

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

3DMark Vantage Performance score

65107

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

54157

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

446992

max 533357

Average: 372425. 7

384458

max 533357

Average: 372425.7

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03

max 202

Average: 64

max 202

Average: 64

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01

136

max 232

Average: 121.3

109

max 232

Average: 121.3

SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase

135

max 175

Average: 108. 4

109

max 175

Average: 108.4

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01

max 107

Average: 39

max 107

Average: 39

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04

max 180

Average: 132.8

max 180

Average: 132.8

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01

max 21

Average: 10. 7

max 21

Average: 10.7

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01

max 153

Average: 52.5

max 153

Average: 52.5

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04

163

max 189

Average: 91.5

154

max 189

Average: 91.5

SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia

156

max 189

Average: 88. 6

155

max 189

Average: 88.6

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05

183

max 316

Average: 189.5

142

max 316

Average: 189.5

SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max

169

max 269

Average: 169.8

137

max 269

Average: 169.8
Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT: What is the difference? 9more memory bandwidth?

483.8GB/s vs 448GB/s

1792bit wider memory bus?
2048bit vs 256bit

1536 more stream processors?
4096 vs 2560

2200million more transistors?
12500 million vs 10300 million

96 more texture units (TMUs)?
256 vs 160

1 more DisplayPort outputs?
3 vs 2

GPU frequency 523MHz higher?
1770MHz vs 1247MHz
29. 66 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
128.6 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s
70W below TDP?
225W vs 295W
805MHz faster memory speed?
1750MHz vs 945MHz
12110MHz higher effective clock speed?
14000MHz vs 1890MHz
464MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
2010MHz vs 1546MHz
Are 7nm smaller semiconductors?
7nm vs 14nm
1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT Mech 2X

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Asus ROG Strix RX Vega 64 Gaming

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

AMD Radeon RX VEGA 64

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

SAPPHire NITRO+ RADEON RX 5700 XT

9000 VS

NVIDIA GEFOR RTX0005

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon RX 580X

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Mech 2X

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Gigabyte Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 580 8GB

User Reviews Price Match

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

1247MHz

1770MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.turbo GPU

1546MHz

2010MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel speed

98.94 GPixel/s

128.6 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

12.6 TFLOPS

10.29 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

395.8 GTexels/s

321.6 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

945MHz

1750MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7. shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

1890MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2. max memory bandwidth

483.8GB/s

448GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

2048bit

256bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5.GDDR memory versions

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

OpenGL version 2.

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.Supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.DLSS Supported

✖AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✖Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

✔Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream video and audio to the connected HD display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI version 3

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX Vega 64)

HDMI 2.0

New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5. DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0005

Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black: What is the difference?

57 Ballla

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

44 BALLLA

VISIONETEK RADEON RX VEGA 64 Black

54 facts compared to

9000 AMD RADEON RX 5700 XT

VISIONENTEK RADK0005

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT better than VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black?

GPU frequency 358MHz higher?
1605MHz vs 1247MHz
22.96 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
121.9 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s
70W below TDP?
225W vs 295W
805MHz faster memory speed?
1750MHz vs 945MHz
12110MHz higher effective clock speed?
14000MHz vs 1890MHz
359MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1905MHz vs 1546MHz
Are 7nm semiconductors smaller?
7nm vs 14nm
1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3

Why is VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

2. 91 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
12.66TFLOPS vs 9.75 TFLOPS
91 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
483.8GB/s vs 448GB/s
1792bit wider memory bus?
2048bit vs 256bit
1536 more stream processors?
4096 vs 2560
2200million more transistors?
12500 million vs 10300 million
96 more texture units (TMUs)?
256 vs 160

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RXT

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

VS 9000 VS 9000 NVIDIA 9000 NVIDI

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

MSI 6600 XT GAMING GAMING GAMING 9000 GMD Radeon RDS 9000 VS 9000 VS VS VS VS VS VS VS 9000 VS VS VS 1660 Super

0 Reviews of users

Visiontek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

0. 0 /10

0 Reviews of Users

Price and Quality Refract

8.0 /10

Votes 9000

Games

9.0 /10

1 Votes

reviews yet there is no

performance

/10

1 Votes

reviews yet there is no

fan noise

5.0 /10

1 votes

reviews yet there are no

Reliability

7.0 /10

1 votes 9000

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1605MHz

1247MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.turbo GPU

1905MHz

1546MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

121.9 GPixel/s

98.94 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

9.75 TFLOPS

12.66 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

304.8 GTexels/s

395.8 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

945MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs take textured units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

Memory

1.memory effective speed

14000MHz

1890MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

448GB/s

483.8GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is dedicated video memory. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

2048bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black)

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improves performance.

6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

OpenGL version 2.

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.DLSS Supported

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5700XT)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2. HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5. DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6 outputs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price match

Cancel

Which graphic cards are better?

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition — Th200

Contents

Introduction
Features
Tests
Key differences
Conclusion
Comments

Video card

Introduction

We compared two graphics cards: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Navi Generation (RX 5000) RDNA 1.0 Graphics Card Released Jul 7th, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition is a Vega generation (RX Vega) graphics card based on GCN 5.0 architecture released Aug 7th, 2017. It comes with 8GB HBM2 memory running at 945MHz, has 2x 8-pin power connector and consumes up to 165 watts.

Specification

Graphics Card

Name

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

12 (12_1)

Opengl

4.6

OpenCl

2.1

9000 9000

Board design

295W

Power Conventors

1x 6-Pin + 1x 8-Pin

2x 8-Pin

Slot

Dual-Slot

Tests

Blender BMW27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

Th200 RP

Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition
+3%

Key Differences

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition?

Newer — 1 year later release

Uses 24% less power — 225W vs 295W

More modern manufacturing process — 7nm vs 14nm

Has a 29% higher pixel fill rate — 126.7 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary?

Has 3% more performance

More advanced memory type — HBM2 vs. GDDR6

Has a slightly larger memory bus

Has 8% more bandwidth — 483.8 GB/s vs 448.0 GB/s

Has 25 % faster texture fill rate — 395.8 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s

Has 1536 more shading units

Has 24 more compute units

Conclusion

Which is better Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition or Radeon XT 50th Anniversary?

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition delivers 3% better performance, consumes up to 32% more energy and holds the same amount of memory. Based on our research, Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition 3990X is more powerful than the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition?

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is AMD’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition. It is 7% more powerful, uses 17% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition?

The GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition. It is 1% more powerful, uses 16% less energy, and holds the same amount of memory.

How does Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary perform compared to Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition and other graphics cards?

Relative performance

Total performance

Bench performance

Radeon RX 5700XT and RX 5700 Unveiled — Navi Materializes

AMD held the highly anticipated Navi presentation at E3 and explained the highlights during the event. However, there are still some issues that I will have to clear up in the coming days or weeks. Unfortunately, this also includes AMD (new) policy information has not written all the media in advance. AMD Leads RRP 449USD for the Radeon RX 5700XT, or 379 usd for the Radeon 5700 as the price. The market launch is announced for 07/07/2019 and thus simultaneously with the new Ryzen processors.

Details of the new Radeon RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT

The Radeon RX 5700 XT has 2560 stream processors and 160 texture units divided into 40 compute units. With a maximum clock pulse of 1.905 MHz, these CUs allow up to 9.75 TFLOPS of processing power. On paper, the card will sit somewhere between the Radeon RX 590 and Radeon RX Vega 56. However, AMD is setting a slightly different clock this time around, so the boost clock may just be a sort of vanity rating.

A more realistic specification is 1755 MHz. AMD says that this game clock speed is typical of the more than 20 games you’ve tested yourself, and so you’d expect cards to run somewhere between this game and boost clock. A high base clock at 1605 MHz should always be guaranteed, even under a worst case workload like Furmark.

AMD combines the Radeon RX 5700 XT with 8GB of GDDR6 memory, transferring 14Gbps data over a 256-bit bus. As a result, the theoretical bandwidth of 448 GBps exceeds the 410 GBps available for the Radeon RX Vega 56 over 8GB HBM2, but lags behind the 483 GBps Radeon RX Vega 64.

implementation slot with a radial fan that blows air through an aluminum heat sink lamella that sits on the steam chamber as usual and where waste heat on the card slot panel can be avoided (Direct thermal exhaust). Many enthusiasts are quite critical of this solution as it tends to be louder. However, we value this very feature over axial fans, which dissipate heat energy back into the interior of the PC case.

AMD also assures us that the fan speed will be carefully adjusted to keep sound levels below 43dB(A). An aluminum alloy body and backplate cover the front and back of the card, while a high-quality graphite pad change phase ensures maximum heat transfer from the Navi chip as usual.

The Radeon RX 5700 reference card gets a relatively small cut and loses four CUs compared to the XT variant and thus 256 stream processors. The remaining 2304 ALUs and 144 texture units operate at typical game clock speeds of 1625 MHz and 1465 MHz base clocks. AMD says the RX 5700 can achieve a pulse clock of 1.725 MHz and that’s exactly what it calculates to 7.95 TFLOPS of processing power on this card. All 64 Navi ROPs are retained when the Radeon RX 5700 XT slimmed down to the RX 5700, as well as the chip’s 256-bit memory bus and 4MB load level cache.

Both cards support PCI Express 4.0 and thus theoretical transfer rates of 16 GTps. Of course, there are no compatible platforms at the moment. PCIe 4.0 support for older AMD chipsets was officially dropped earlier this month due to signal integrity concerns on motherboards that were not explicitly designed to support the standard. But until Radeon RX 5700 series cards are available, third-generation X570-based boards and Ryzen processors should also be ready to provide the foundation for PCIe 4.0 add-on cards.

The two new Radeons are equipped with an eight-pole and a six-pole external power outlet. In the case of the Radeon RX 5700 XT, the board’s listed power of 225 watts would require this configuration. But the Radeon RX 5700 could probably do with 2 6-pin or 8-pin jacks for its typical 180W board. According to AMD, the 5700 XT uses a seven-phase power supply, while the 5700 loses a GPU phase and a total of six stages remain for GPU memory and GDDR6.

Where is gaming performance now? In regards to this performance, AMD has announced that the Radeon RX 5700 XT will beat (link) the GeForce RTX 2070, which also means that it should have no issues crowding out the Radeon RX Vega 64 in our base set. The Radeon RX 5700 is also expected to beat the current GeForce RTX 2060. This is exactly what I suspected the was in a video about Nvidia’s «Super » card.

Old or new? A sneak peek at the new AMD 9 GPU0004

Navi outperforms its GCN predecessors due to several improvements built into an architecture called AMD RDNA (Radeon DNA). While the company says RDNA is brand new, remnants of the Core Next graphics are clearly recognizable throughout. However, instead of debating how much the GPU needs to be changed in order to talk about a truly new architecture, we should look at what RDNA really covers.

The biggest advantage of this design is the architectural reorganization which results in higher throughput per cycle. Significant efforts have been made to simplify the use of compute units for a wider range of workloads. And the optimization for single-threaded performance needs to be translated into lower latency for parallel tasks. The cache hierarchy has also been improved with a new L1 (512KB in total) and a better delta color compression algorithm that provides more efficient throughput than AMD’s previous generation.

Discussions leading up to Navi’s announcement make it clear that AMD is using some of its Zen design techniques to improve the graphics pipeline as well. The Gating clock allows you to optimize the power per watt to fix one of the Vega’s ugliest shortcomings. As a result, lower stage logic also allows significantly higher operating frequencies. Taken together, AMD says these efforts are about 10% profitable compared to GCN.

Of course, Navi also benefits greatly from TSMC’s 7nm node and the benefits of new process technology. The chip consists of 10.3 billion transistors distributed on a 251mm2 chip. Vega is much larger. Manufactured according to GlobalFoundries’ 14nm LPP process, it includes 12.5 billion transistors in a 495mm2 chip.

Unsurprisingly AMD delivers better frame rates than Vega 64 with significantly lower board performance.

In addition to its 3D-oriented features, Navi also has an improved video engine. Now fixed function hardware accelerates VP9 decoding at up to 4K90 and 8K24, H.264 decoding at 1080p600 and 4K150, encoding at 1080p360 and 4K90, H.265 decoding at 1080p360, 4K90 and 8K24, and encoding at 1080p360 and 4K600. Encoder acceleration is reported to be up to 40%. The

Radeon Display Engine now also supports 1.2a display stream compression, which is important for its ability to run 4K monitors at over 120Hz refresh rates without chrome sub-sampling. Previously, 3840 x 2160 pixels and 144Hz performance required a reduction in image quality to stay below the DisplayPort bandwidth limit. In addition, you can also reduce to 120Hz at 8bpc color depth. And if you are using an HDR monitor then you would have to go back to 98Hz for 10bpc. With the advantage of nearly losing free compression, however, AMD can now also control 4K monitors at up to 240Hz or 8K monitors at up to 60Hz through a single cable without having to worry about those trade-offs.

However, keep in mind that monitors must also support DSC for the feature to work at all. AMD enthusiastically unveiled Asus’ future 43″ DisplayHDR-1000 certified display with native UHD resolution and 144Hz refresh rate, but couldn’t give us more details than to mention that it will certainly support DSC for single-channel connections.0005

Currently no Ray Tracing today and somewhat vague future outlook
Navi does not include hardware support for ray tracing in any form. David Wang, vice president of AMD Radeon Technologies Group, said existing GCN and RDNA GPUs will support shader-assisted ray tracing in ProRender (developer) and Radeon Rays (developer). Then, on the way there, next-generation RDNA implementations will (should) be developed to accelerate «selected lighting effects for real-time gaming.»

AMD’s vision is to track radiation through the cloud. Could the company mean that complex calculations are then implemented not locally, but as pure stream content for gamers? I can’t imagine that customers would be delighted with such an offer. Regardless, AMD expects it will take a few more years for this 8-time real-time ray tracking feature to even get started.

There is much more to be said about Navi’s core architecture, so today’s article can only be a small and superficial summary and preview. Also, AMD unfortunately «forgot» to offer briefings and slides for all relevant editors, so I too unfortunately had to resort to third party material.

radeon rx vega 64 | Tags | Overclockers.ru

Alexey Sychev

October 12, 2020 at 13:26

News of the anatomical theater.

Alexey Sychev

June 21, 2020 at 08:09

There are not many left in the wild.

Dmitry Olegovich

March 22, 2020

Testing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 graphics cards at 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1080, 2560 x 1440, 3440 x 1440, 3840 x 2160 resolutions, two operating modes and eight games.

PhoenixOC

February 23, 2020

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, GeForce RTX 2070 Super, GeForce RTX 2060 Super video cards tested in eight games, five resolutions, and two operating modes.

Dmitry Prilepskikh

November 17, 2019

Testing Intel Core i5-9400F and Core i3-9350KF processors in conjunction with Radeon RX Vega 64 at 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440 and ten games.

mpanasovsky

July 13, 2019

Now it costs £300.

mpanasovsky

July 13, 2019

Following the retirement of Radeon VII.

Phoenix

March 22, 2019

Testing seven AMD and NVIDIA graphics cards and two processors in fifteen games, two operating modes and a resolution of 1920 x 1080.

Phoenix

March 17, 2019

Testing nineteen (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) GPU models in twenty games, three resolutions and two operating modes: nominal and overclocked.

Phoenix

March 10, 2019

Testing the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti based on the Turing TU116 core and eleven other NVIDIA and AMD models in twenty games, 1920 x 1080 and 2560 x 1440 resolutions, and two operating modes.

Phoenix

March 6, 2019

Testing Intel Core i5-9600K, Core i5-8600K, Core i5-8500, Core i5-7600K, Core i5-7500, AMD Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 7 1800X, and Ryzen 7 1700X processors with GeForce RTX graphics cards 2080 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64 in fifteen games at 19 resolution20 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

February 26, 2019

Testing the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and 11 other models from NVIDIA and AMD in 20 games at 1920×1080, 2560×1440 and 3840×2160 resolutions, and two operating modes.

Phoenix

February 24, 2019

Testing seventeen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce RTX 2080) in conjunction with a six-core Core i5-9 processor600K in fifteen games, 1920 x 1080 resolution and two modes of operation.

Dmitry Vladimirovich

February 22, 2019

No one would have guessed about the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti six months ago. NVIDIA so carefully concealed its intentions, convincing us of the desire to release exclusively the GeForce RTX line, that there was an impression of the rival’s dominance in the segment of affordable solutions. It did not last long… The novelty is based on the Turing architecture without additional hardware blocks of tensor and RT cores.

Phoenix

February 17, 2019

Testing processors Intel Core i5-8400, Core i3-8350K, Core i3-8300, Core i5-7400, Core i3-7350K, Core i3-7320, Core i3-7300, Core i3-7100, AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 5 2600, Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 5 1600X with GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64 graphics cards in fifteen games, 1920 x 1080 resolution and two operating modes.

Phoenix

February 14, 2019

Testing the GeForce RTX 2060 and eleven other models from NVIDIA and AMD in twenty games, 1920 x 1080 and 2560 x 1440 resolutions, and two operating modes.

PhoenixOC

February 11, 2019

Summary testing of twenty ctvb video cards (from GeForce GTX 950 to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and from Radeon RX 460 to Radeon RX Vega 64) and thirty-two processors (from Pentium G5600 to Core i7-8700K and from Ryzen 3 1200 to Ryzen 7 2700X) in three resolutions and two operating modes.

Phoenix

February 10, 2019

Testing Intel Core i7-8700K, Core i3-8350K, AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 1500X processors and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070, GeForce GTX 1060, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, Radeon RX 580 in fifteen games, 1920x resolution 1080 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

February 3, 2019

Testing the GeForce RTX 2070 and eleven other models from NVIDIA and AMD in twenty games at 19 resolutions20 x 1080, 2560 x 1440 and 3840 x 2160, as well as two modes of operation.

Phoenix

January 24, 2019

Testing Intel Pentium G5600, Pentium G5500, Pentium G5400, AMD Ryzen 3 2200G, Ryzen 5 1500X, Ryzen 5 1400, Ryzen 3 1300X, and Ryzen 3 1200 Processors with GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64 at fifteen games 1920 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

Dmitry Vladimirovich

January 23, 2019

Announced in late summer 2018, Turing’s older models surprised with their performance and price. Despite the fact that no one mentioned an available version at the official event, there were suggestions that it would definitely appear. Now we can personally verify its existence and compare it with the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1060 and other video cards.

Phoenix

January 20, 2019

Tested thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) in conjunction with a quad-core Core i3-8350K processor in ten games, 1920 x 1080 resolution and two operating modes.

Phoenix

January 13, 2019

Testing Intel Core i5-8500, Core i5-8400, Core i3-8350K, Core i5-7600K, Core i5-7400, AMD Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 7 1800X, and Ryzen 7 1700 processors with GeForce RTX graphics cards 2080 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64 in ten games, 19 resolution20 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

Alexey Sychev

January 12, 2019 at 09:31

In terms of unit area of the crystal!

id_1

January 10, 2019

The novelty has a significant advantage over its rival of the previous generation.

Phoenix

January 9, 2019

Tested thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) in conjunction with a Core i3-8100 and Pentium G5600 processor in ten games, 1920 x 1080 resolution and two operating modes .

Phoenix

January 6, 2019

Tested thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) with Core i5-8400 in ten games, 19 resolution20 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

December 26, 2018

Tested thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) with a Ryzen 5 2600 processor in ten games, 1920 x 1080 resolution, and two operating modes.

Phoenix

December 23, 2018

Tested thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) in conjunction with a Ryzen 5 1500X processor in ten games, 1920 x 1080 resolution and two operating modes.

Phoenix

December 9, 2018

Testing fourteen (from Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) models of graphics accelerators in ten games, three resolutions and two operating modes: nominal and after overclocking.

Phoenix

December 5, 2018

Testing AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 1500X, Intel Core i7-8700K, Core i3-8350K processors and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, Radeon RX 580, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060 in ten games, 1920x resolution 1080 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

December 2, 2018

Testing Intel Core i3-8300, Core i3-8100, Pentium G5600, Core i3-7350K, Core i3-7100, AMD Ryzen 5 2600, Ryzen 5 1600X, Ryzen 5 1500X and Ryzen 3 1200 with GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX Vega 64 in ten games, 19 resolution20 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

November 30, 2018

Aggregate testing of twenty-three graphics cards (GeForce GTX 950 to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon RX 460 to Radeon RX Vega 64) and thirty-two processors (Pentium G5600 to Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 3 1200 to Ryzen 7 2700X ) in three resolutions and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

November 29, 2018

Aggregate testing of twenty-three graphics cards (GeForce GTX 950 to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon RX 460 to Radeon RX Vega 64) and thirty-two processors (Pentium G5600 to Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 3 1200 to Ryzen 7 2700X ) in three resolutions and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

November 28, 2018

Testing thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) with Core i5-8600K in ten games, 19 resolution20 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

November 26, 2018

Aggregate testing of twenty-three graphics cards (GeForce GTX 950 to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon RX 460 to Radeon RX Vega 64) and thirty-two processors (Pentium G5600 to Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 3 1200 to Ryzen 7 2700X) in three resolutions and two operating modes.

Phoenix

November 22, 2018

Testing six AMD and Nvidia graphics cards and two processors in ten games, two operating modes and a resolution of 1920 x 1080.

Phoenix

November 18, 2018

Testing thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) in conjunction with a Ryzen 7 2700 processor in ten games, 1920 x 1080 resolution and two operating modes.

Phoenix

November 15, 2018

Testing Intel Core i7-8700K, Core i7-8700, Core i5-8600K, Core i7-7700K, Core i7-7700, AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 2700 processors with GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX Vega graphics cards 64 in ten games, 19 resolution20 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

October 28, 2018

Testing fourteen (from Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and from GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) models of graphics accelerators in ten games, three resolutions and two operating modes: in nominal and after overclocking.

Dmitry Vladimirovich

October 26, 2018

The arrival of the GeForce RTX 2070 has been delayed: shifted sales start dates, lack of reference design versions, secrecy of full characteristics. But it was she who, at the expense of an attractive price, was supposed to pave the way for a bright future in the world of RTX. However, this did not happen. The new graphics card is slightly more powerful than the GeForce GTX 1080, and for the price they are relatively equal. The more interesting it will be to compare them in games.

Phoenix

October 23, 2018

Testing thirteen models of graphics accelerators (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) in conjunction with a Core i3-8350K processor in eight games, resolutions of 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440 and two modes of operation.

Phoenix

October 16, 2018

Testing AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 1500X, Intel Core i7-8700K, Core i3-8350K processors and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, Radeon RX 580, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060 in eight games, resolution 1920 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

PhoenixOC

October 11, 2018

Aggregate testing of twenty-three graphics cards (GeForce GTX 950 to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon RX 460 to Radeon RX Vega 64) and thirty-two processors (Pentium G5600 to Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 3 1200 to Ryzen 7 2700X) in three resolutions and two operating modes.

Phoenix

October 10, 2018

Testing Intel Core i3-8300, Core i3-8100, Pentium G5600, Pentium G5400, Core i3-7320, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, Ryzen 5 1600X, Ryzen 5 1500X and Ryzen 3 1300X with GeForce GTX 1080 graphics cards and Radeon RX Vega 64 in eight games, 19 resolution20 x 1080 and two modes of operation.

PhoenixOC

October 9, 2018

Aggregate testing of twenty-three graphics cards (GeForce GTX 950 to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon RX 460 to Radeon RX Vega 64) and thirty-two processors (Pentium G5600 to Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 3 1200 to Ryzen 7 2700X) in three resolutions and two operating modes.

Phoenix

October 7, 2018

Testing six AMD and Nvidia graphics cards and two processors in eight games, two operating modes, 19 resolutions20 x 1080, 2560 x 1440 and 3840 x 2160.

Phoenix

October 3, 2018

Testing thirteen GPU models (Radeon RX 560 to Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1050 to GeForce GTX 1080) in conjunction with a Core i5-8400 processor in eight games, 1920 x 1080 resolution and two operating modes .

Radeon 5700 vs vega 64: RX 5700 vs RX Vega 64 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-7700K)

Radeon RX 5700 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5700

Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 64

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 5700

Core Configuration

Memory Configuration

Additional details

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT: What is the difference?

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 better than HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT?

Why is HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

Memory

Features

Ports

Price comparison

Which are the best graphics cards?

RX Vega 64 vs RX 5700 XT ⚙️

AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Compare benchmarks

Compare specifications (specs)

Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs Radeon Pro Vega 64 Graphics cards Comparison

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares

AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Specifications:

Performances :

See also:

Equivalence:

What is better than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 or HIS Radeon RX 5700 XT

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT: What is the difference? 9more memory bandwidth?

What are the most popular comparisons?

User Reviews Price Match

Performance

Memory

Functions

Ports

Price match

Which graphics cards are better?

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black: What is the difference?

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT better than VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black?

Why is VisionTek Radeon RX Vega 64 Black better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Performance

Memory

Functions

Ports

Price match

Which graphic cards are better?

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

Introduction

Specification

Graphics Card

Tests

Key Differences

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary better than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition?

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary?

Conclusion

Which is better Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition or Radeon XT 50th Anniversary?

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition?

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition?

How does Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary perform compared to Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition and other graphics cards?

Radeon RX 5700XT and RX 5700 Unveiled — Navi Materializes

radeon rx vega 64 | Tags | Overclockers.ru