Radeon pro 555x vs gtx 1660 ti: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555X [in 3 benchmarks]

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs Radeon Pro 555X Graphics cards Comparison

When choosing between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon Pro 555X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let’s find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon Pro 555X.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile

Check Price

Radeon Pro 555X

Check Price

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon Pro 555X are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon Pro 555X are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile or Radeon Pro 555X here:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile Laptops

Radeon Pro 555X Laptops

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile Radeon Pro 555X
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is connected by PCIe 3. 0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 555X — in Mobile workstations.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 555X — with Polaris.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555X.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555X — by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 6920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555X.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 50−55 16−18
ultra / 1080p 35−40 10−11
QHD / 1440p 27−30 4−5
4K / 2160p 16−18 4−5
low / 720p 80−85 30−35
medium / 1080p 60−65 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 206% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
high / 1080p 80−85 24−27
ultra / 1080p 70−75 21−24
QHD / 1440p 55−60 10−11
4K / 2160p 30−33 6−7
low / 720p 130−140 55−60
medium / 1080p 90−95 30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Battlefield 5 is 212% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
QHD / 1440p 0−1
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon Pro 555X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 220−230
medium / 768p 230−240 190−200
ultra / 1080p 100−110
QHD / 1440p 150−160 60−65
4K / 2160p 100−110 30−35
high / 768p 220−230 150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
low / 768p 70−75 55−60
ultra / 1080p 40−45
medium / 1080p 50−55 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
low / 768p 120−130 110−120
medium / 768p 110−120 95−100
ultra / 1080p 110−120 65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Dota 2 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
high / 1080p 65−70 20−22
ultra / 1080p 60−65 18−20
QHD / 1440p 40−45 16−18
4K / 2160p 21−24 6−7
low / 720p 100−110 40−45
medium / 1080p 70−75 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Far Cry 5 is 195% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
high / 1080p 95−100 27−30
ultra / 1080p 75−80 21−24
QHD / 1440p 45−50 16−18
4K / 2160p 21−24
low / 720p 220−230 100−110
medium / 1080p 150−160 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Fortnite is 160% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
high / 1080p 85−90 27−30
ultra / 1080p 70−75 21−24
QHD / 1440p 50−55 10−11
4K / 2160p 35−40 10−11
low / 720p 140−150 55−60
medium / 1080p 95−100 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 203% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
low / 768p 160−170 90−95
medium / 768p 150−160 80−85
high / 1080p 100−110 30−35
ultra / 1080p 50−55 12−14
QHD / 1440p 40−45 4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
high / 1080p 40−45 10−11
ultra / 1080p 30−35 8−9
QHD / 1440p 24−27
4K / 2160p 14−16 3−4
low / 720p 95−100 30−35
medium / 1080p 55−60 14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
low / 768p 120−130 110−120
medium / 1080p 100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
high / 1080p 80−85 24−27
ultra / 1080p 55−60 18−20
4K / 2160p 18−20
low / 720p 120−130 60−65
medium / 1080p 90−95 24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
high / 1080p 35−40 14−16
ultra / 1080p 24−27 10−11
QHD / 1440p 18−20 0−1
4K / 2160p 12−14
low / 720p 95−100 30−35
medium / 1080p 55−60 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 184% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
low / 768p 190−200 60−65
medium / 768p 130−140 35−40
high / 1080p 75−80 21−24
ultra / 1080p 40−45 12−14
4K / 2160p 27−30 8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 239% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.
low / 768p 130−140 100−110
medium / 768p 60−65
ultra / 1080p 65−70 35−40
high / 768p 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon Pro 555X.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile Radeon Pro 555X
Architecture Turing Polaris
Code name N18E-G0 Polaris 21
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Release date 23 April 2019 5 June 2017
Pipelines 1536 768
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 855 MHz
Boost Clock 1590 MHz
Transistor count 6,600 million 3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 152. 6 43.54
Memory bus width 192 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 81.6 GB/s
Shared memory
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_0)
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
CUDA 7.5
FreeSync +
Laptop size medium sized large
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
  • Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 860M
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 470
  • Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 860M
  • Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 470

Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — Th200

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Specifications
  3. Benchmarks
  4. Games
  5. Key Differences
  6. Conclusion
  7. Comments

Graphics card

Graphics card

Introduction

We compared two GPUs: the AMD Radeon Pro 555X versus the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. On this page you will learn about the key differences between graphics cards and find out which has the best specs and performance.

The AMD Radeon Pro 555X is an integrated graphics card of the Radeon Pro Mac (500X Series) generation based on the GCN 4.0 architecture, launched on Jul 16th, 2018.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a graphics card of the GeForce 16 generation based on the Turing architecture, launched on Feb 22nd, 2019. It comes with 6 Gb of GDDR6 memory clocked at 1500 MHz, requires 1x 8-pin power connectors and consumes up to 120 Watts.

Specifications

Graphics Card

Name

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Release Date

Jul 16th, 2018

Feb 22nd, 2019

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

PCIe 3.0 x16

Graphics Processor

Die Size

123 mm²

284 mm²

Memory

Bandwidth

94.08 GB/s

288.0 GB/s

Theoretical Performance

Pixel Rate

14. 51 GPixel/s

84.96 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

43.54 GTexel/s

169.9 GTexel/s

FP16 (half) performance

1,393 GFLOPS (1:1)

10.87 TFLOPS (2:1)

FP32 (float) performance

1,393 GFLOPS

5.437 TFLOPS

FP64 (double) performance

87.07 GFLOPS (1:16)

169.9 GFLOPS (1:32)

Clock Speeds

Base Clock

1500 MHz

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

Memory Clock

1470 MHz

1500 MHz

Render Config

Shading Units

768

1536

Texture Units

48

96

Raster Units

16

48

SM Count

24

Compute Units

12

Graphics Features

DirectX

12 (12_0)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

4.6

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Cuda

7.5

Vulkan

1.2

1.2

Board Design

TDP

75W

120W

Power Connectors

None

1x 8-pin

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Benchmarks

Th200 RP

Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures raw power of the components and gives score, with higher number indicating better performance.

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+329%

3DMark Graphics

3DMark is a computer benchmarking tool created and developed by UL, to measure the performance of computer hardware. Running 3DMark produces a 3DMark score, with higher numbers indicating better performance.

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own Benchmark, which is widely used to determining the rendering performance of processors and graphics cards. Benchmark measures the time needed to render bmw27 scene.

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Games

1920×1080, Ultra

Game Radeon Pro 555X GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

+8%

Battlefield V

+4%

Far Cry 5

+2%

Hitman 2

+6%

Metro Exodus

+4%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

+1%

The Witcher 3

+2%

Average 0. 00 fps 75.46 fps

2560×1440, Ultra

Game Radeon Pro 555X GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Anno 1800

+1%

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

+6%

Battlefield V
Far Cry 5

+2%

Hitman 2

+5%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3

+3%

Average 0. 00 fps 55.27 fps

3840×2160, Ultra

Game Radeon Pro 555X GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Anno 1800
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

+6%

Battlefield V

+1%

Far Cry 5

+2%

Hitman 2

+4%

Metro Exodus

+3%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

+1%

The Witcher 3

+3%

Average 0. 00 fps 30.29 fps

Key Differences

Why is AMD Radeon Pro 555X better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

Consumes up to 38% less energy — 75 Watts versus 120 Watts

Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than AMD Radeon Pro 555X?

Newer — released 7 months later

Has 329% better performance

More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm versus 14 nm

Has 2 Gb more memory

More advanced more type — GDDR6 versus GDDR5

Has 64 bit wider memory bus

Has 207% higher bandwidth — 288.0 GB/s versus 94.08 GB/s

Has 486% higher pixel rate — 84.96 GPixel/s versus 14.51 GPixel/s

Has 291% higher texture rate — 169.9 GTexel/s versus 43.54 GTexel/s

Has 48 more texture units

Has 32 more raster units

Has 768 more shading units

Conclusion

Which is better GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Radeon Pro 555X?

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti delivers 329% better performance, consumes up to 61% more energy and holds 2 Gb more memory. Based on our research GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more powerful than Radeon Pro 555X.

Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti good today?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 Gb memory and shows an average of 75.46 FPS in 7 games at 1080p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

The Radeon R9 390X is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. It is 1% more powerful, uses 130% more energy, and holds 2 Gb less memory.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. It is 2% more powerful, uses 5% more energy, and holds same amount of memory.

How does Radeon Pro 555X perform compared to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and other graphics cards?

Relative performance

Global performance

Desktop performance

Workstation performance

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X


Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon Pro 555X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)

Buy on Amazon


vs

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 907 MHz
  • 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2. 4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5100 MHz
  • 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 2350
  • 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 2350
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 4093
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 4093
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3351
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3351












Launch date 23 April 2019 vs 16 July 2018
Core clock speed 1455 MHz vs 907 MHz
Pipelines 1536 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 5100 MHz
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 15109 vs 2350
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 15109 vs 2350
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16828 vs 4093
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16828 vs 4093
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 8054 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 8054 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X







GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2















Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) AMD Radeon Pro 555X
PassMark — G2D Mark 507
PassMark — G3D Mark 10176
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 5586
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 15109 2350
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 15109 2350
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16828 4093
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16828 4093
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 8054 3351
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 8054 3351
Geekbench — OpenCL

13877
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

35.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

668.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

3.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

49.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

170.952

Compare specifications (specs)




















NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Architecture Turing GCN 4. 0
Code name N18E-G0 Polaris 21
Launch date 23 April 2019 16 July 2018
Place in performance rating 63 866
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Boost clock speed 1590 MHz
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 907 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 1536 768
Transistor count 6600 million 3,000 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

75 Watt
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Laptop size medium sized
Interface

PCIe 3. 0 x8
Supplementary power connectors

None
DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL

4.5
Maximum RAM amount 6144 MB
Memory bus width 192 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 5100 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) with others




NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)



vs



AMD
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid




NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2060




NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2060 Super




NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q




NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)



vs



AMD
Radeon Pro VII




NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)



vs



AMD
Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Performance Rating — 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

log 01. 18:53:17

#0 checking url part for id 9965 +0s … 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9832 +0s … 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:27:11 +0200 +0.001s … 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.052s … 0.052s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s … 0.059s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.059s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.059s

#15 composed specs +0s … 0.059s

#16 did output specs +0s … 0.059s

#17 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.059s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.029s … 0.088s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 9965 +0.006s … 0.094s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.094s

#21 got single benchmarks 9965 +0.011s … 0.105s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.109s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 003s … 0.112s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 9832 +0s … 0.112s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.113s

#26 got single benchmarks 9832 +0.024s … 0.137s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.137s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.137s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.137s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s … 0.139s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.139s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.139s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.139s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.139s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.139s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.139s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.139s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.139s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.139s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.139s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.14s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.14s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.14s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.14s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.14s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.14s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.141s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.141s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.141s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.141s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.141s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.142s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.142s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.142s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.143s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.143s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.143s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.143s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.143s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.143s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.143s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.145s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.145s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.145s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.146s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.146s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.146s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.146s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.146s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.146s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.146s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.146s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.146s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.146s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.147s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.148s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.148s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.148s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.149s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.149s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.15s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.15s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.15s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.151s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.151s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.152s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.153s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.153s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.153s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.154s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.154s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.154s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.155s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.155s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.155s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.157s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.157s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.158s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.158s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.159s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.159s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.16s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.16s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.16s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.161s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.161s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.161s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.161s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.162s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.162s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.162s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.162s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#152 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.163s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.163s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.164s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#158 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.164s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.165s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.165s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.165s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#165 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.166s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.166s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.167s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.167s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.168s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s . .. 0.168s

#174 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.169s

#175 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.169s

#176 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.17s

#177 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.17s

#178 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.171s

#179 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.171s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.172s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.173s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.174s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.174s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.175s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.175s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.176s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.176s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.177s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.177s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.178s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.178s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.179s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.179s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.18s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.18s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.18s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.181s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.181s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.182s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.182s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.182s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.183s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.183s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.183s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.184s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.184s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.184s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.185s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.185s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.185s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.186s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.186s

#241 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s … 0.187s

#242 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.187s

#243 Got 886 rows for game benchmarks. +0.074s … 0.261s

#244 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0. 261s

#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.261s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#266 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.261s

#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.261s

#276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#277 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.262s

#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#297 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#300 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.262s

#301 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#302 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#306 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#307 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#309 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.262s

#311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#312 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.263s

#315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#317 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#320 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#323 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#325 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#326 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#328 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.263s

#329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#331 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#336 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#342 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.263s

#343 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#344 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#345 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#347 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#351 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.263s

#355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.264s

#357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#359 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#367 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#368 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#370 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.264s

#371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#374 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#379 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#381 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.264s

#385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#389 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.264s

#390 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.265s

#399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#404 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#410 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.265s

#413 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#414 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#415 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#416 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#422 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.265s

#424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#425 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.266s

#427 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#436 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#437 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#440 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.266s

#441 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#444 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#448 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#450 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.266s

#454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.267s

#455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#457 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#459 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#460 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.267s

#469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#480 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.267s

#483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#484 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#487 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.267s

#488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#490 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#491 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#492 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#493 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#494 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#495 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#496 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.268s

#497 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#498 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#499 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#500 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#501 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#502 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#503 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#504 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#505 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#506 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#507 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#508 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#509 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#510 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.268s

#511 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#512 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#513 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#514 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#515 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#516 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#517 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#518 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#519 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#520 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#521 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#522 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#523 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#524 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.268s

#525 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#526 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#527 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#528 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#529 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#530 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#531 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#532 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#533 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.268s

#534 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#535 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#536 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#537 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#538 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.269s

#539 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#540 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#541 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#542 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#543 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#544 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#545 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#546 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#547 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#548 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#549 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#550 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#551 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#552 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.269s

#553 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#554 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#555 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#556 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#557 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#558 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#559 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#560 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#561 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#562 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#563 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#564 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#565 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#566 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.269s

#567 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#568 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#569 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#570 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#571 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#572 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#573 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#574 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#575 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#576 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#577 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#578 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#579 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#580 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.269s

#581 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#582 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#583 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#584 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#585 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.269s

#586 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#587 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#588 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#589 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#590 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#591 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#592 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#593 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#594 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s .. . 0.27s

#595 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#596 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#597 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#598 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#599 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#600 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#601 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#602 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#603 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#604 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#605 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#606 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#607 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#608 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#609 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.27s

#610 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#611 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#612 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#613 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#614 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#615 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#616 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#617 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#618 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#619 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#620 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#621 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#622 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#623 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#624 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.27s

#625 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#626 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#627 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#628 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#629 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#630 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#631 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#632 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#633 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#634 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#635 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#636 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#637 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#638 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#639 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.27s

#640 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.27s

#641 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#642 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#643 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#644 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#645 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#646 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#647 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#648 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#649 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#650 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#651 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#652 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#653 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.271s

#654 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#655 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#656 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#657 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#658 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#659 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#660 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#661 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#662 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#663 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#664 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#665 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#666 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#667 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.271s

#668 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#669 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#670 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#671 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#672 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#673 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#674 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#675 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#676 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#677 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#678 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#679 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#680 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#681 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.271s

#682 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#683 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#684 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#685 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#686 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#687 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#688 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#689 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#690 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#691 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#692 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#693 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#694 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#695 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.271s

#696 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#697 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#698 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#699 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#700 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#701 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#702 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.271s

#703 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#704 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#705 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#706 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#707 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#708 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#709 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.272s

#710 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#711 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#712 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#713 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#714 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#715 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#716 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#717 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#718 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#719 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#720 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#721 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#722 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#723 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.272s

#724 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#725 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#726 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#727 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#728 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#729 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#730 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#731 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#732 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#733 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#734 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#735 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#736 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#737 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.272s

#738 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#739 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#740 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#741 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#742 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#743 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#744 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#745 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#746 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#747 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#748 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#749 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#750 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#751 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.272s

#752 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#753 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#754 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#755 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#756 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#757 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#758 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#759 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#760 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#761 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#762 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#763 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.272s

#764 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#765 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.273s

#766 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#767 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#768 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#769 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#770 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#771 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#772 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#773 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#774 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#775 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#776 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#777 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#778 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#779 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.273s

#780 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#781 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#782 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#783 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#784 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#785 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#786 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#787 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#788 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#789 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#790 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#791 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#792 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#793 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.273s

#794 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#795 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#796 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#797 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#798 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#799 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#800 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#801 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#802 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#803 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#804 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#805 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#806 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#807 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.273s

#808 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#809 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#810 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#811 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#812 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#813 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#814 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#815 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#816 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#817 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#818 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#819 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#820 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#821 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.274s

#822 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#823 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#824 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#825 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#826 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#827 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#828 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#829 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#830 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#831 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#832 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#833 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#834 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#835 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.274s

#836 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#837 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#838 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#839 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#840 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#841 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#842 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#843 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#844 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#845 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#846 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#847 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#848 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#849 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.274s

#850 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#851 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.274s

#852 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#853 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#854 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#855 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#856 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#857 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#858 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#859 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#860 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#861 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#862 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#863 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.275s

#864 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#865 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#866 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#867 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#868 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#869 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#870 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#871 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#872 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#873 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#874 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#875 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#876 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#877 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.275s

#878 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#879 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#880 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#881 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#882 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#883 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#884 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#885 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#886 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#887 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#888 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#889 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#890 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#891 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.275s

#892 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#893 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#894 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#895 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#896 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#897 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#898 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#899 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#900 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#901 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#902 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#903 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#904 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#905 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.276s

#906 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#907 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#908 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#909 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#910 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#911 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#912 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#913 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#914 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#915 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#916 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#917 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#918 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#919 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.276s

#920 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#921 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#922 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#923 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#924 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#925 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#926 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#927 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#928 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#929 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#930 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#931 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#932 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#933 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.277s

#934 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#935 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#936 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#937 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#938 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#939 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#940 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#941 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#942 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#943 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#944 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#945 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#946 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#947 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.277s

#948 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#949 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#950 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#951 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#952 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#953 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#954 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#955 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#956 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#957 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#958 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#959 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#960 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#961 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.277s

#962 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#963 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#964 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#965 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#966 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#967 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#968 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#969 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#970 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#971 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#972 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#973 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#974 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#975 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.277s

#976 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#977 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#978 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#979 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#980 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#981 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#982 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#983 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#984 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#985 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#986 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#987 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#988 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#989 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.277s

#990 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#991 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#992 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#993 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#994 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#995 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#996 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#997 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#998 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#999 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1000 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1001 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1002 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1003 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.278s

#1004 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1005 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1006 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1007 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1008 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1009 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1010 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1011 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1012 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1013 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1014 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1015 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1016 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#1017 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.278s

#1018 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s … 0.281s

#1019 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.037s … 0.319s

#1020 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s … 0.326s

#1021 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s … 0.331s

#1022 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.335s

#1023 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.338s

#1024 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.339s

#1025 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.341s

#1026 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.341s

#1027 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.341s

#1028 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.341s

#1029 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.341s

#1030 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.341s

#1031 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.342s

#1032 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.342s

#1033 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.342s

#1034 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.342s

#1035 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.342s

#1036 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.342s

#1037 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.343s

#1038 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.343s

#1039 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.343s

#1040 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.343s

#1041 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.343s

#1042 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.344s

#1043 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.344s

#1044 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.344s

#1045 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.344s

#1046 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.344s

#1047 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.344s

#1048 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.346s

#1049 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1050 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1051 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1052 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1053 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1054 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1055 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1056 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1057 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.346s

#1058 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.347s

#1059 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.347s

#1060 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1061 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1062 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1063 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1064 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1065 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1066 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1067 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.347s

#1068 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.348s

#1069 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1070 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1071 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1072 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1073 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.348s

#1074 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1075 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1076 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1077 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.348s

#1078 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.349s

#1079 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1080 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1081 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1082 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1083 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1084 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1085 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1086 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1087 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.349s

#1088 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.349s

#1089 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1090 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1091 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.349s

#1092 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1093 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.35s

#1094 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1095 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1096 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1097 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1098 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1099 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.35s

#1102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.35s

#1103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.351s

#1104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.351s

#1113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.352s

#1114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.352s

#1115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.352s

#1116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.352s

#1117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.352s

#1118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.352s

#1119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.352s

#1120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.352s

#1121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.353s

#1122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.353s

#1130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.353s

#1131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.353s

#1132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.354s

#1141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.354s

#1144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.354s

#1148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.355s

#1149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.355s

#1157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.355s

#1158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.356s

#1159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.356s

#1168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.357s

#1169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.357s

#1172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.357s

#1178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.358s

#1179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.358s

#1186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.358s

#1192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.359s

#1193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.359s

#1200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.359s

#1203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.359s

#1209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.36s

#1214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.36s

#1217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.36s

#1224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.361s

#1225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.361s

#1228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.361s

#1236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.362s

#1239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.362s

#1242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1243 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.362s

#1251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.363s

#1252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.363s

#1256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.363s

#1265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.364s

#1266 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.364s

#1270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.364s

#1275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1277 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.365s

#1280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.365s

#1284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.365s

#1292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.366s

#1293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.366s

#1294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.366s

#1295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.366s

#1296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.366s

#1297 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.366s

#1298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.366s

#1299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.366s

#1300 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.366s

#1301 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.367s

#1302 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.367s

#1303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.367s

#1304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.367s

#1305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.368s

#1306 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.368s

#1307 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.368s

#1308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.368s

#1309 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.368s

#1310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.368s

#1311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.368s

#1312 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.368s

#1313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.368s

#1314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.369s

#1315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.369s

#1316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.369s

#1317 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.369s

#1318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.369s

#1319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.369s

#1320 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.369s

#1321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.369s

#1322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1323 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1325 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.37s

#1326 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1328 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1331 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.37s

#1334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1336 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.37s

#1337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.371s

#1340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1342 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1343 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1344 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1345 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1347 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.371s

#1348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1351 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.371s

#1354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.371s

#1357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.372s

#1358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1359 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1367 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.372s

#1368 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.372s

#1370 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.373s

#1371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.373s

#1372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.373s

#1373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.373s

#1374 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.373s

#1375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.373s

#1376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.374s

#1377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.374s

#1378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.374s

#1379 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.374s

#1380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.375s

#1381 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.375s

#1382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1389 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1390 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.375s

#1392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.376s

#1393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.376s

#1396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.376s

#1399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1404 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.376s

#1409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.377s

#1410 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1413 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1414 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1415 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1416 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.377s

#1420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.378s

#1421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.03s … 0.408s

#1422 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.012s … 0.42s

#1423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 01s … 0.43s

#1424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s … 0.438s

#1425 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s … 0.444s

#1426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.449s

#1427 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.449s

#1431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.449s

#1436 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1437 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.45s

#1438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1440 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1441 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1444 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.45s

#1445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.451s

#1446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1448 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.451s

#1449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1450 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.451s

#1452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1457 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1459 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1460 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.451s

#1464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.452s

#1465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.452s

#1466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.452s

#1467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.452s

#1468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.453s

#1469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.453s

#1477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.454s

#1478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.454s

#1479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.454s

#1480 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.454s

#1481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.454s

#1482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.454s

#1483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.454s

#1484 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.454s

#1485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.455s

#1486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1487 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1490 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1491 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1492 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1493 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.455s

#1494 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1495 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.455s

#1496 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.456s

#1497 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.456s

#1498 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.456s

#1499 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.456s

#1500 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.456s

#1501 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.456s

#1502 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.456s

#1503 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.457s

#1504 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.457s

#1505 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.458s

#1506 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.458s

#1507 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.458s

#1508 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.458s

#1509 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.458s

#1510 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.458s

#1511 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.458s

#1512 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.459s

#1513 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.459s

#1514 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.459s

#1515 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.46s

#1516 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1517 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1518 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1519 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1520 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1521 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.46s

#1522 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1523 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1524 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1525 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1526 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1527 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1528 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1529 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1530 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1531 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.46s

#1532 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.461s

#1533 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.461s

#1534 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.461s

#1535 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.462s

#1536 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1537 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1538 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1539 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1540 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1541 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1542 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1543 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1544 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1545 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1546 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1547 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1548 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1549 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.462s

#1550 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1551 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1552 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1553 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1554 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1555 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1556 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1557 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1558 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.462s

#1559 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.463s

#1560 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.465s

#1561 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.467s

#1562 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.47s

#1563 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 002s … 0.472s

#1564 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.475s

#1565 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.479s

#1566 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.483s

#1567 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.483s

#1568 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.484s

#1569 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1570 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1571 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1572 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.484s

#1573 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1574 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1575 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1576 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1577 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.484s

#1578 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1579 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1580 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1581 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1582 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.484s

#1583 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1584 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1585 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1586 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1587 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1588 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1589 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1590 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.485s

#1591 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.485s

#1592 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1593 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.485s

#1594 benchmarks composed for output. +0s … 0.485s

#1595 calculated avg scores. +0s … 0.485s

#1596 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s … 0.491s

#1597 return log +0.002s … 0.493s

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: What is the difference?

47points

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

55points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Why is AMD Radeon Pro W5500 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

  • 250MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1750MHzvs1500MHz
  • 2000MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    14000MHzvs12000MHz
  • 33. 33% more VRAM?
    8GBvs6GB
  • 0.8 newer version of OpenCL?
    2vs1.2
  • 5nm smaller semiconductor size?
    7nmvs12nm
  • 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
    4vs3
  • 3 more DisplayPort outputs?
    4vs1

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than AMD Radeon Pro W5500?

  • 313MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1500MHzvs1187MHz
  • 40.16 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    84.96 GPixel/svs44.8 GPixel/s
  • 46.7 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    169.9 GTexels/svs123.2 GTexels/s
  • 64GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    288GB/svs224GB/s
  • 64bit wider memory bus width?
    192bitvs128bit
  • Supports ray tracing?
  • 128 more shading units?
    1536vs1408
  • 370MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1770MHzvs1400MHz

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

AMD FirePro W9100

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

0 User reviews

AMD Radeon Pro W5500

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

10.0/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

9.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

8.7/10

3 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

9.7/10

3 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

 

8.3/10

3 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1187MHz

1500MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1400MHz

1770MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

44. 8 GPixel/s

84.96 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

5.35 TFLOPS

5.44 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

123.2 GTexels/s

169.9 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

1500MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

14000MHz

12000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

224GB/s

288GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

192bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon Pro W5500

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✖AMD Radeon Pro W5500

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon Pro W5500)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon Pro W5500

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon Pro W5500

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon Pro W5500

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon Pro W5500)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✖AMD Radeon Pro W5500

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon Pro W5500)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon Pro W5500)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mega Benchmark

As we had anticipated, we are following up to our GeForce GTX 1660 Ti review with an even more ample 33 game benchmark test. The day-one review looked at a dozen of the more recently released games such as Resident Evil 2, Metro Exodus, Apex Legends, and many others.

We were keen to see how the 1660 Ti stacked up in a much wider range of games, so today we’re doing that. The performance summary and breakdown section includes the 12 games we already looked at along with the new 21 titles, and for 12 of those 21 titles we’ll analyze and comment the results more closely below.

We completed all testing in the same test bed comprised of a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. As for drivers we used Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.2 for the Radeon GPUs and Game Ready 418.91 WHQL for the GeForce GPUs.

Benchmarks

First up we have Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey and despite being an AMD sponsored title it does prefer Nvidia hardware and we see that here as the GTX 1660 Ti is able to match Vega 64. It was also 42% faster than the RX 590. When compared to other GeForce parts it matched the GTX 1070 and was just 11% slower than the RTX 2060.

Next up we have Strange Brigade, another AMD sponsored title. This time it plays nice with AMD hardware which makes better sense. Interestingly, whereas the RTX 2070 is a good bit faster than the GTX 1080, the GTX 1660 Ti is actually a little slower than the GTX 1070. Still overall performance at 1440p was good and the new affordable Turing GPU also edged out the RX 590.

In Star Wars Battlefront II the GTX 1660 Ti demonstrates how it’s clearly a class ahead of the GTX 1060 6GB and RX 590, offering over 40% more performance. In this title we’re looking at GTX 1070 or Vega 56-like performance with a healthy 68 fps on average.

DiRT 4 using CMAA is an AMD special, but even so the GTX 1660 Ti was able to match the RX 590, providing the same experience. The 1660 Ti also roughly matched the GTX 1070 Ti and was just 5% slower than the GTX 1080.

Next we have For Honor, here we see the GTX 1660 Ti creeping in just behind the GTX 1070, which meant it was also a few frames down on Vega 56. Even so it was still almost 30% faster than the RX 590 and GTX 1060 6GB.

Sniper Elite 4 is one of the few games that supports DirectX 12 and actually runs better using DX12. That said, the GTX 1660 Ti did trail the GTX 1070 by a small margin in this one. It was also 12% slower than Vega 56. While not a bad result, it wasn’t the card’s best showing either.

In The Witcher 3 the 1660 Ti matches the GTX 1070 as it often does. The GPU also matched Vega 56 and was 26% faster than the Radeon RX 590, but most crucially with the game’s visual settings just about maxed out it provided a very playable 54 fps on average at 1440p. This enabled a much better experience than either the RX 590 or 6GB GTX 1060.

F1 fans will appreciate what the GTX 1660 Ti has to offer for less than $300. You’re looking at performance somewhere between a GTX 1070 and 1070 Ti. The Radeon GPUs perform very well in this title, too, but even so the 1660 Ti dusted the RX 590 by a 23% margin.

Testing with Warhammer Vermintide 2 sees the GTX 1660 Ti match Vega 56, and please note we’re using the DirectX 11 API for testing. A few Vega users complained that we were favoring Nvidia by using DX11, that’s not the intention but last we checked DX11 offered better frame time performance. We plan to retest these GPUs with DX12 just to make sure. Plus, in case those Vega owners didn’t get the memo, Turing is pretty handy in DX12 and Vulkan titles now anyway.

Performance in Prey is a little down on what you might be expecting from the GTX 1660 Ti, though with 86 fps on average it was still well ahead of the RX 590 and GTX 1060 6GB. The 1% low result was very solid, too, though it lagged behind the 1070 by a 9% margin which was a little surprising.

Kingdom Come Deliverance has the 1660 Ti sitting between the 1070 and 1070 Ti, making this new mid-range GPU ~14-15% slower than the more expensive RTX 2060 and Vega 56. It also wasn’t that much faster than the RX 590. .. well, it was 22% faster, but given we’ve seen it up around 40% at times, a 22% margin looks modest in this instance.

We’ve already seen how Warframe runs better with Pascal GPUs. For example, the GTX 1080 is 8% faster than the RTX 2070. Here the GTX 1070 was 16% faster than the 1660 Ti, in fact, the new budget Turing offering was only 9% faster than the GTX 1060 6GB, so a fairly disappointing result to end on for fans of Warframe.

Performance Summary

GTX 1660 Ti vs. GTX 1060

In our day-one review the GTX 1660 Ti came out 40% faster on average when compared to the GTX 1060 6GB at 1440p. That figure has dropped quite a bit in the 33 game comparison, now the 1660 Ti is just 34% faster, though still a decent margin.

The reason for this is down to the more limited game selection that purely by chance were more favorable to the Turing GPU. The focus was on new titles such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Apex Legends, Resident Evil 2 and Hitman 2, all of which heavily favored the 1660 Ti.

However now we have included games such as Warframe, Shadow of War and half a dozen other titles that saw the 1660 Ti beat the 1060 by less than 30%, bringing that average down and making the GTX 1660 Ti 34% faster on average against the GTX 1060 6G, which in itself is not a bad result given it costs just 12% more.

GTX 1660 Ti vs. GTX 1070

In our day-one coverage the 1660 Ti was ~2% faster on average against the GTX 1070 and because of that we noted performance to be basically the same overall. Now in our 33 game test the 1660 Ti came out exactly level with the 1070. This graph gives us a good idea of where Turing is more efficient than Pascal and, of course, Turing is faster under all conditions. It’s just that in this case we’re pitting a 1920 CUDA core Pascal part against a 1536 CUDA core Turing part.

GTX 1660 Ti vs. RTX 2060

For the RTX 2060 comparison we see similar margins to our original review. Previously the 1660 Ti was 12% slower, now with 33 games that margin is increased ever so slightly to 14%. We’ve got to retest Forza Horizon 4 to try and work out what’s going on there, but other than that the only other major outliers include Warframe, Metro Exodus and World of Tanks.

GTX 1660 Ti vs. Radeon RX 590

The performance margin remains the same for the Radeon RX 590 comparison.

The 1660 Ti is 24% faster here.

GTX 1660 Ti vs. Vega 56

When put against the Radeon Vega 56, the GTX 1660 Ti is 8% slower on average, though with more titles at hand we see a few examples where the GTX 1660 Ti was significantly slower: Warframe, Strange Brigade, Battlefield V, DiRT 4 and Resident Evil 2, for example. Meanwhile, the GTX 1660 Ti was slightly faster or a match for Vega 56 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Fortnite, Vermintide 2 and Apex Legends.

Cost per Frame and Closing Thoughts

A quick update to our cost per frame graph. If you read our GTX 1660 Ti review from days prior, the change here is very small at ~2-4 fps for the most part. Only the Radeon VII saw a significant change in the 33 game sample, and here it stacks up much better than on the previous 12-game comparison. But for the purpose of this article, we’re not interested in Radeon VII, rather Vega 56, RX 590 and RX 580 play more consequential roles in this comparison.

Overall little has changed… the GTX 1660 Ti is only 9% more expensive than the RX 580 per frame, but 12% cheaper than the RX 590 and 22% cheaper than Vega 56, at the more typical $400 asking price. Then compared to the RTX 2060, the cost per frame of the 1660 Ti is improved by 7%, so a solid result for the new GTX graphics card.

That’s how the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti stacks up in a wide range of games and it was interesting to see where it offered big gains over GPUs such as the GTX 1060 6GB, and then others where the gains were less impressive.

Although the GTX 1660 Ti looks less appealing for GTX 1060 6GB owners in this massive benchmark comparison, a 34% performance boost on average is still nothing to scoff at. If we were currently gaming with a GTX 1060 and were after something with a bit more punch, upgrading to a GTX 1660 Ti is worthy of consideration. The new GPU does offer next tier performance for a small price premium. Of course, if you have anything faster than a GTX 1060 or RX 580, such as Vega 56 or the GTX 1070, there’s still no worthwhile upgrade choice if you want best value for your money.

For those coming from much older mid-range GPUs, your top choices are either the GTX 1660 Ti or Vega 56. The RX 590 simply isn’t fast enough for the price, though we are finally starting to see some changes with some models dropping as low as $240, which does nudge closer in terms of cost per frame. Still, for that level of performance you’re usually better off with the Radeon RX 580. We don’t expect a true GTX 1660 Ti competitor from AMD until Navi drops.

There are currently a number of 1660 Ti graphics cards available at the $280 MSRP.

Zotac with their Gaming model, MSI has the Zentus, EVGA has the XC Black, Gigabyte is offering a base model OC card as well as a Mini-ITX version. So it’d appear getting a decent model for the MSRP is not an issue. We really like the look of the MSI Ventus and we’ll try to get our hands on one very soon. As it stands today, the GTX 1660 Ti has no competition for best value and overall package for the price.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX Vega 56 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX Vega 64 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 570 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 580 on Amazon, Newegg

AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (mobile) comparison, which is better?

DeviceList score

We’ve compared AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

AMD Radeon Pro 555X Benefits

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Benefits

Comparison Winner

Number of shader processors

1536

768 (100%) better than

vs

768

Core frequency

1455 MHz

At 548 MHz (60.4%) better than

vs

907 MHz

Process

12 nm

-2 nm (-14.3%) better than

vs

14 nm

Maximum memory

6 GB

2 GB (50%) better than

vs

4 GB

Memory bus width

192 bit

64 bit (50%) better than

vs

128 bit

Memory frequency

12000 MHz

At 6900 MHz (135. 3%) better than

vs

5100 MHz

Memory bandwidth

288

206.4 (252.9%) better than

vs

81.6

General information

Value for money

The sum of all the benefits of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

n/a 60.4%

Architecture

GCN 4.0 Turing

Codename

Polaris 21 TU116

Type

Mobile workstation For laptops

Release price

n/a 229 $

Number of shaders

768 1536

768 (100%) better than

Core clock

907MHz 1455 MHz

At 548 MHz (60. 4%) better than

Boost frequency

n/a 1590 MHz

Number of transistors

3.000 million 6.600 million

Process

14 nm 12 nm

-2 nm (-14.3%) better than

Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16

Power Demand (TDP)

The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

75W n/a

Additional power connectors

no n/a

FreeSync

+ n/a

DisplayPort 1. 3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready

+ no data

Video connectors

No outputs No outputs

DirectX

12 (12_0) 12 (12_1)
Benchmarks
0033

GDDR5 GDDR6

Maximum memory

Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures,
use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

4 GB 6 GB

2 GB (50%) better than

Memory bus width

The larger the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.

128 bit 192 bit

64 bit (50%) better than

Shared memory

Memory frequency

A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

5100 MHz 12000 MHz

At 6900 MHz (135.3%) better than

Memory bandwidth

The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.

81.6 288

206.4 (252.9%) better than

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro 555X video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

versus

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

  • Newer graphics card, 7 month(s) release date difference
  • about

    MHz more core frequency:

    % faster MHz

  • A newer technological process for the production of a video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.4 times faster memory frequency: 12000 MHz vs 5100 MHz
  • 4.3 times faster performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 60040 vs 13877
  • Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection s) 5.7 times greater: 202.702 vs 35.283
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3.8 times greater: 2572.509 vs 668.308
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Benchmark T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.2 times bigger: 16.493 vs 3.158
  • 2.9 times greater performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 144.404 vs 49.593
  • 5.4 times greater performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark( a) more: 927.813 vs 170.952
  • 4.1 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 4093
  • about 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3718 vs 2350
  • About 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 16952 vs 4093
  • About 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2350
Production date 22 February 2019 vs 16 July 2018 Core frequency 1500 MHz vs 907 MHz Process 12 nm vs 14 nm Memory frequency 12000 MHz vs 5100 MHz Geekbench — OpenCL 60040 vs 13877 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 202.702 vs 35.283 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2572.509 vs 668.308 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.493 vs 3.158 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 144.404 vs 49.593 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 927.813 vs 170.952 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16952 vs 4093 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 2350 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3351 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16952 vs 4093 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 2350 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3351

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro 555X

  • About 60% less power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
TDP 75 Watt vs 120 Watt

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Geekbench — OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
202.702
35.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2572.509
668.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16. 493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
144.404
49.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
927.813
170.952
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti AMD Radeon Pro 555X
PassMark — G3D Mark 11848
PassMark — G2D Mark 705
Geekbench — OpenCL 60040 13877
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 202.702 35.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2572.509 668.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.493 3.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 144.404 49.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 927.813 170.952
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16952 4093
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3718 2350
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3351
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16952 4093
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3718 2350
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3351
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 6332

Feature comparison

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Architecture Turing GCN 4. 0
Codename TU116 Polaris 21
Production date February 22, 2019 July 16, 2018
Price at first issue date $279
Place in the ranking 107 866
Price now $279.99
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 67.32
Boost core clock 1770 MHz
Core frequency 1500MHz 907MHz
Process 12nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 75 Watt
Number of transistors 6,600 million 3,000 million
Number of shaders 768
Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
Number of DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 229mm
Additional power connectors 1x 8-pin None
DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Memory frequency 12000 MHz 5100MHz
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory type GDDR5

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro 555X video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

versus

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

  • Newer graphics card, approximately 9 month(s) difference in release dates
  • 9049 More frequency than 9 month(s)

    9049 MHz vs 907 MHz

  • Number of shader processors 2 times more: 1536 vs 768
  • 0500
  • Approximately 25% less power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 3. 8x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 53231 vs 13877
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) performance in 5.6 times bigger: 195.93 vs 35.283
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2.9 times bigger: 1919.95 vs 668.308
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 — T-Rex Desktop benchmark (Frames/s) 4.6 times bigger: 14.6 vs 3.158
  • About 91% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 94.964 vs 49.593
  • 2.9x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark: 492.867 vs 170.952
  • About 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 4093
  • About 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 23500500
  • 3 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 4093
  • About 58% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2350
Production date 23 April 2019 vs 16 July 2018 Core frequency 1140 MHz vs 907 MHz Number of shader processors 1536 vs 768 Process 12 nm vs 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt vs 75 Watt Geekbench — OpenCL 53231 vs 13877 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 195.93 vs 35.283 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1919.95 vs 668.308 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.6 vs 3.158 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.964 vs 49.593 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 492.867 vs 170.952 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12301 vs 4093 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 2350 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3351 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12301 vs 4093 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 2350 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3351

Reasons to Choose AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    9049 5100 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
    GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    Geekbench — OpenCL
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    195.93
    35.283
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    1919.95
    668.308
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    94.964
    49.593
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    492.867
    170.952
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro 555X
    PassMark — G3D Mark 8620
    PassMark — G2D Mark 731
    Geekbench — OpenCL 53231 13877
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 195. 93 35.283
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1919.95 668.308
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.6 3.158
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.964 49.593
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 492.867 170.952
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12301 4093
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3718 2350
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3351
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12301 4093
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3718 2350
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3351
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 4964

    Feature comparison

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro 555X
    Architecture Turing GCN 4. 0
    Codename TU116 Polaris 21
    Production date 23 April 2019 July 16, 2018
    Place in the ranking 171 866
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Boost core clock 1335MHz
    Core frequency 1140MHz 907 MHz
    Process 12nm 14nm
    Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 128. 2GFLOPS
    Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.202 TFLOPS
    Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.101TFLOPS
    Number of shaders 1536 768
    Pixel fill rate 64.08 GPixel/s
    Texturing speed 128.2 GTexel/s
    Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 75 Watt
    Number of transistors 6600 million 3,000 million
    Video connectors No outputs No outputs
    Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
    Notebook size medium sized
    Additional power connectors None
    DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
    OpenCL 1.2
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    Shader Model 6.4
    Vulcan
    Maximum memory size 6GB
    Memory bandwidth 288. 0 GB/s
    Memory bus width 192bit 128 Bit
    Memory frequency 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 5100MHz
    Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

    GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555X

    GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555X — Th200

    Contents

    1. Introduction
    2. Features
    3. Tests
    4. Games
    5. Key differences
    6. Conclusion
    7. Comments

    Video card

    Video card

    Introduction

    We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD Radeon Pro 555X. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

    The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a Turing-based GeForce 16 generation graphics card released Feb 22nd, 2019. It comes with 6GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz, has a 1x 8-pin power connector, and draws up to 165W.

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X is a Radeon Pro Mac generation (500X Series) integrated graphics card based on GCN 4.0 architecture released on Jul 16th, 2018.

    Specifications

    Graphics Card

    Pixel filling speed

    84.96 GPIXEL/S

    14.51 GPIXEL/S

    Filling the textures

    169.9 GTEXEL/S

    43.54 GTEXEL/S

    FP16 (HALF) Performance

    9000.87

    1,393 GFLOPS (1:1)

    FP32 (float) performance

    5.437 TFLOPS

    1,393 GFLOPS

    FP64 (double) performance

    169.9 GFLOPS (1:32)

    87.07 GFLOPS (1:16)

    Clock Speeds

    DirectX

    12 (12_1)

    12 (12_0)

    Opengl

    4. 6

    4.6

    OpenCL

    3.0

    2.1

    CUDA

    7.5

    VULKAN

    9000.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.000 VULKAN Design

    Heating

    120W

    75W

    power connectors

    1x 8-pin

    None

    Slot

    Dual-Slot

    IGP

    Tests

    Tests

    0495

    3DMark Graphics

    3DMark is a test tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    Blender bmw27

    Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    Th200 RP

    Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
    +329%

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    Games

    1920×1080, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Radeon Pro 555X
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    +8%

    Battlefield V

    +4%

    Far Cry 5

    +2%

    Hitman 2

    +6%

    Metro Exodus

    +4%

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    +1%

    The Witcher 3

    +2%

    Average 75. 46 fps 0.00 fps

    2560×1440, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Radeon Pro 555X
    Anno 1800

    +1%

    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    +6%

    Battlefield V
    Far Cry 5

    +2%

    Hitman 2

    +5%

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3

    +3%

    Average 55. 27 fps 0.00 fps

    3840×2160, Ultra

    Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Radeon Pro 555X
    Anno 1800
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    +6%

    Battlefield V

    +1%

    Far Cry 5

    +2%

    Hitman 2

    +4%

    Metro Exodus

    +3%

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    +1%

    The Witcher 3

    +3%

    Average 30. 29 fps 0.00 fps

    Key differences

    Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than AMD Radeon Pro 555X?

    Newer — released 7 months later

    Has 329% better performance

    More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs 14 nm

    Has 2 GB more memory

    More advanced memory type — GDDR6 vs GDDR5

    Has a slightly larger memory bus

    Has a 207% higher throughput — 288.0 GB/s vs 94.08 GB/s

    Has a 486% higher pixel fill rate — 84.96 GPixel/s vs 14.51 GPixel/s

    Has 291% faster texture fill rate — 169.9 GTexel/s vs 43.54 GTexel/s

    Has more texture units +48

    Has more raster units +32

    Has 768 more shading units

    Why is AMD Radeon Pro 555X better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

    Uses 38% less power — 75W vs 120W

    Conclusion

    Which is better GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Radeon Pro 555X?

    The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti delivers 329% better performance, consumes up to 61% more energy and holds 2 GB more memory. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 3990X is more powerful than Radeon Pro 555X according to our research.

    Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti good today?

    GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB memory and shows an average of 75.46 FPS in 7 games at 1080p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
    This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.

    What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

    The Radeon R9 390X is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. It is 1% more powerful, uses 130% more energy, and holds 2 GB less memory.

    What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

    The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. It is 2% more powerful, uses 5% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.

    How does GeForce GTX 1660 Ti perform compared to Radeon Pro 555X and other graphics cards?

    Relative performance

    General performance

    Desktop performance

    Professional performance

    Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — Th200

    Contents

    1. Introduction
    2. Features
    3. Tests
    4. Games
    5. Key differences
    6. Conclusion
    7. Comments

    Video card

    Video card

    Introduction

    We compared two graphics cards: AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X is a Radeon Pro Mac (500X Series) integrated graphics card based on GCN 4.0 architecture released on Jul 16th, 2018. , released Feb 22nd, 2019. It comes with 6GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1500MHz, has a 1x 8-pin power connector, and consumes up to 165W.

    Features

    Graphics Card

    Pixel filling speed

    14.51 GPIXEL/S

    84.96 GPIXEL/S

    Filling the textures

    43.54 GTEXEL/S

    169.9 GTEXEL/S

    FP16 (HALF) PERFORMANCE

    1.39

    10.87 TFLOPS (2:1)

    FP32 (float) performance

    1,393 GFLOPS

    5.437 TFLOPS

    FP64 (double) performance

    87.07 GFLOPS (1:16)

    169.9 GFLOPS (1:32)

    Clock Speeds

    DirectX

    12 (12_0)

    12 (12_1)

    Opengl

    4.6

    4.6

    OpenCL

    2. 1

    3.03

    CUDA

    7.5

    Vulkan

    9000.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.000 VULKAN Design

    Heating

    75W

    120W

    power connectors

    None

    1x 8-pin

    Slot

    Igp

    Dual-Slot

    Tests

    Tests

    0495

    Th200 RP

    Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
    +329%

    3DMark Graphics

    3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Blender bmw27

    Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

    AMD Radeon Pro 555X

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Gaming

    1920×1080, Ultra

    Game Radeon Pro 555X GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    +8%

    Battlefield V

    +4%

    Far Cry 5

    +2%

    Hitman 2

    +6%

    Metro Exodus

    +4%

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    +1%

    The Witcher 3

    +2%

    Average 0. 00 fps 75.46 fps

    2560×1440, Ultra

    Game Radeon Pro 555X GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
    Anno 1800

    +1%

    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    +6%

    Battlefield V
    Far Cry 5

    +2%

    Hitman 2

    +5%

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    The Witcher 3

    +3%

    Average 0. 00 fps 55.27 fps

    3840×2160, Ultra

    Game Radeon Pro 555X GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
    Anno 1800
    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    +6%

    Battlefield V

    +1%

    Far Cry 5

    +2%

    Hitman 2

    +4%

    Metro Exodus

    +3%

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    +1%

    The Witcher 3

    +3%

    Average 0. 00 fps 30.29 fps

    Key differences

    Why is AMD Radeon Pro 555X better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

    Uses 38% less power — 75W vs 120W

    Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than AMD Radeon Pro 555X?

    Newer — 7 months late release

    Has 329% better performance

    More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs 14 nm

    Has 2 GB more memory

    More advanced memory type — GDDR6 vs GDDR5

    Has a slightly larger memory bus

    Has 207% more bandwidth — 288.0 GB/s vs 94.08 GB/s

    Has 4 % faster pixel fill rate — 84.96 GPixel/s vs 14.51 GPixel/s

    Has 291% faster texture fill rate — 169.9 GTexel/s vs 43.54 GTexel/s

    Has more texture units +48

    Has 768 more shading units

    Conclusion

    Which is better GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Radeon Pro 555X?

    The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti delivers 329% better performance, consumes up to 61% more energy and holds 2 GB more memory. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 3990X is more powerful than Radeon Pro 555X according to our research.

    Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti good today?

    GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB memory and shows an average of 75.46 FPS in 7 games at 1080p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
    This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.

    What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

    The Radeon R9 390X is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. It is 1% more powerful, uses 130% more energy, and holds 2 GB less memory.

    What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

    The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. It is 2% more powerful, uses 5% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.

    How does Radeon Pro 555X perform compared to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and other graphics cards?

    Relative performance

    General performance

    Desktop performance

    Professional performance

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    M vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: What is the difference?

    47points

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    55points

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    0003

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Why is AMD Radeon RX 5500M better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

    • 35W below TDP?
      85W vs 120W
    • 250MHz faster memory speed?
      1750MHz vs 1500MHz
    • 2000MHz higher effective clock speed?
      14000MHz vs 12000MHz
    • 0. 8 newer version of OpenCL?
      2 vs 1.2
    • Smaller semiconductors 5nm?
      7nm vs 12nm
    • 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
      4 vs 3

    Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than AMD Radeon RX 5500M?

    • GPU frequency 125MHz higher?
      1500MHz vs 1375MHz
    • 0.81 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
      5.44 TFLOPS vs 4.63 TFLOPS
    • 32.36 GPixel/s higher pixel speed?
      84.96 GPixel/s vs 52.6 GPixel/s
    • 1.5x more VRAM?
      6GB vs 4GB
    • 25.14 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
      288GB/s vs 224GB/s
    • 64bit wider memory bus?
      192bit vs 128bit
    • Supports ray tracing?

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    VS

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2060

    NVIDIA GTX

    9000 2 VS

    NVIDIA GTX 100003

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    vs

    0002 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    3 Reviews of users

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    10. 0 /10

    3 Reviews of users

    Functions

    Review

    9 9

    9.3 /10

    3 Votes

    Games

    9.2 /10

    5 Votes

    8.7 /10

    3 Votes

    performance

    003

    9.4 /10

    5 Votes

    9.7 /10

    3 Votes

    Room of the fan

    8.8 /10 9000 9000 5 Votes

    8.3 /10

    9000 9000. Reliability

    9.6 /10

    5 Votes

    /10

    3 Votes

    Productivity

    1. TECTIC FELACE GP

    1375MHz

    1500MHz

    GPUs (GPU) has a higher graphic processor (GPU) frequency.

    2.turbo GPU

    1645MHz

    1770MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    52.6 GPixel/s

    84. 96 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    4.63 TFLOPS

    5.44 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    144.76 GTexels/s

    169.9 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1750MHz

    1500MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs take textured units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    14000MHz

    12000MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    224GB/s

    288GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4. memory bus width

    128bit

    192bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    OpenGL version 2.

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU temperature at boot

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500M)

    Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500M)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500M)

    More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    3rd HDMI version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500M)

    HDMI 2.0

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4.DisplayPort outputs

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500M)

    Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500M)

    Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

    6. Mini DisplayPort outputs

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5500M)

    Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.