AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on GPURace.com
Remove
Remove
Specification
Release Date 2016.11.102017.03.10
Process size 14 nm16 nm
TDP 130 W250 W
Memory type GDDR5GDDR5X
Memory size 8192 MB11264 MB
Memory bus 256 bit352 bit
Bandwidth 224.0 GB/s484.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Search game and resolution All1920x1080 (Full HD)2560×1440 (WQHD)3840×2160 (4K)
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Passmark G3D
Passmark score
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Battlefield V
(average fps) — Ultra — 1920×1080
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Battlefield V
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440
23
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Battlefield V
(average fps) — Ultra — 3840×2160
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
(average fps) — Highest — 1920×1080
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
(average fps) — Highest — 2560×1440
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Battlefield 1
(average fps) — Ultra — 1920×1080
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Battlefield 1
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Battlefield 1
(average fps) — Ultra — 3840×2160
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
(average fps) — High — 1920×1080
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
(average fps) — High — 2560×1440
21
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
(average fps) — High — 3840×2160
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Bioshock Infinite
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Grand Theft Auto V
(average fps) — Very High — 1920×1080
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Grand Theft Auto V
(average fps) — Very High — 2560×1440
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Grand Theft Auto V
(average fps) — Very High — 3840×2160
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
The Witcher III
(average fps) — Ultra — 1920×1080
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
The Witcher III
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440
22
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
The Witcher III
(average fps) — Ultra — 3840×2160
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Battlefield Hardline
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Middle Earth Shadow of Mordor
(average fps) — Very High — 2560×1440
23
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Middle Earth Shadow of Mordor
(average fps) — Very High — 3840×2160
Pro WX 7100
GTX 1080 Ti
Tomb Raider
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440
Similar products
AMD Radeon R9 270
Open Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Open Compare
AMD Radeon VII
Open Compare
AMD Radeon Pro 580
Open Compare
AMD’s New Radeon Pro Duo and WX 8200 GPUs
AMD’s New Radeon Pro Duo and WX 8200 GPUs | Newegg. com
RADEON PRO DUO
THE POWER OF A DUAL GPU FOR EXCEPTIONAL COMPUTE CAPABILITIES
Outperforming NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1080 Ti by 25% for GPGPU workloads and 20% for rendering in Blender, Radeon™ Pro Duo enables professionals to concurrently drive different applications and workloads on each processor, which helps shorten the design cycle and reduce the time to deadline for their creation.
— Drive one-GPU-per-eye rendering for VR
— Simultaneously create on one GPU while rendering on the other
— Accelerate supported applications with the power of Duo
— Deliver up to 113% faster performance than the Radeon™ Pro WX 7100 in Autodesk Maya with the Radeon ProRender plugin
RADEON PRO WX 8200
TACKLE TOMORROW’S PROFESSIONAL WORKFLOWS TODAY
Today’s projects are becoming more complex and deadlines are often becoming shorter, so professionals need to be able to do multiple things at once to get the job done.
The AMD Radeon™ Pro WX 8200 graphics card is designed with the needs of these professionals in mind. Gone are the days where rendering a model would render a workstation unusable for other tasks. The Radeon™ Pro WX 8200’s advanced graphics architecture allows users to render and design at the same time, with up to 13x greater multitasking performance than the NVIDIA Quadro P5000.*
*Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of August 7th, 2018 on a BOXX Apex4 system comprising of an AMD Threadripper 1950X, 32GB DDR4 memory, Microsoft® Windows® 10 64-bit OS, AMD Radeon™ Pro WX 8200 graphics, NVIDIA® Quadro P5000. AMD Radeon™ Pro internal driver 18.20. NVIDIA driver 391.74. Benchmark Applications: SPECviewperf 13 while simultaneously running Blender Cycles benchmark. SPECviewperf 13 results on AMD Radeon™ Pro WX 8200: 3dsmax-06 = 44.
19, catia-05 = 105.72, creo-02 = 68.87, maya-05 = 84.76, snx-03 = 192.20, sw-04 = 72.06. SPECviewperf 13 results on NVIDIA Quadro P5000: 3dsmax-06 = 4.73, catia-05 = 7.15, creo-02 = 6.59, maya-05 = 6.77, snx-03 = 8.54, sw-04 = 6.31. Performance advantage on SPECviewperf 13: 3dsmax-06 = 44.19/4.73 = 9.3x, catia-05 = 105.72/7.15 = 14.7x, creo-02 = 68.87/6.59 = 10.4x, maya-05 = 84.76/6.77 = 12.52x, snx-03 = 192.2/8.54 = 22.5x, sw-04 = 72.06/6.31 = 11.4x. Average performance advantage = 9.3+14.7+10.4+12.52+22.5+11.4/6 = 13x. Blender Cycles Benchmark: WX 8200 time to completion = 87 minutes, Quadro P5000 = 119 minutes. 119/87-1 = 36.7% (1.4x) faster rendering performance than P5000 while running SPECViewperf at the same time. For more information about SPECviewperf, see https://www.spec.org/benchmarks.html#gwpg. PC manufacturers may vary configurations, yielding different results. Performance may vary based on use of latest drivers.
©2018 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, Ryzen, Radeon and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
All prices reflect the final price after savings/rebate(s).
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.
0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
versus
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Benefits
Why choose NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- % more: 1545 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- 1243x more texturing speed: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
- A newer graphics card production process allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14nm
- 2x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 80254 vs 39367
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 115.834
- 2.4x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 24.719 vs 10.152
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 30% more: 136.919 vs 105.263
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 69% more: 1010.818 vs 597.7
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 96% better: 20206 vs 10320
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) about 4% better: 3714 vs 3575
- performance in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (FPS) is about 96% more: 20206 VS 10320
- performance in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0 — Manhattan (FPS) about 4% more: 3714 VS 3575
- About 18% more core clock: 1188 MHz vs 1005 MHz ) more: 7000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- 10.14 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
20.74 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS - 157.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
288 GPixel/s vs 130.
2 GPixel/s - 624MHz faster memory speed?
2000MHz vs 1376MHz - 4992MHz higher effective clock speed?
16000MHz vs 11008MHz - 45.45% more VRAM?
16GB vs 11GB - 316 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
648 GTexels/s vs 332 GTexels/s - 28GB/s more memory bandwidth?
512GB/s vs 484GB/s - Supports ray tracing?
- 80W below TDP?
220W vs 300W - 96bit wider memory bus?
352bit vs 256bit - 1 more DisplayPort outputs?
3 vs 2 - Has DPFP?
- 8.8mm lower?
111.2mm vs 120mm
9019 about 71% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 3403.
106 vs 1987.633
| 13 November 2018 vs 10 November 2016 | |
| Boost core clock | 1545 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 222. 5 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel/s |
| Process | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 80254 vs 39367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 vs 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 vs 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 vs 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 vs 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010. 818 vs 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3347 |
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
| Core clock | 1188 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory frequency | 7000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
719 
677 | Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 80254 | 39367 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
282.628 | 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3714 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 7878 | |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 7950 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 802 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4. 0 |
| Codename | TU104 | Ellesmere |
| Generation GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Production date | November 13, 2018 | November 10, 2016 |
| Price at first issue date | $899 | $799 |
| Ranking | 89 | 189 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $539. 99 |
|
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 19.25 | |
| Boost core clock | 1545 MHz | 1243MHz |
| Core frequency | 1005 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Process | 12nm | 14nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7. 119 TFLOPS |
|
| Number of shaders | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texturing speed | 222.5 GTexel/s | 179.0 GTexel/s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 13600 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating point performance | 5. 728 gflops |
|
| Video connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
| Additional power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4. 6 |
4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulcan | ||
| Maximum memory size | 8GB | 8GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256bit | 256 bit |
| Memory frequency | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 7000MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1. 3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready |
||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: What is the difference?
67 BALLLA
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
51 BALLLA
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1080 TI
Winner when compared to
VS
56 AMD Radeon RADEON RADION
NVIDID 9000 NVIDID 9000 NVIDID 9000 NVIDI Why is AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti?
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti better than AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
VS
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TI
VS
NVIDIA GTX 1660 TI
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
9000 VS
NVIDIA GEFOR RTX0003
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
VS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1080 TI
VS
NVIDIA T4
AMD RADEON RX 6800 XT
VS VS
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Price Matching
User Reviews Overall Rating
0017
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
2 reviews of users
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
9.
5 /10
2 Reviews of users
NVIDIA GTX 1080 TI
10.0 /10
1 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
9.5 /10
2 VOTES
9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 /10
1 Votes
Games
9.0 /10
2 Votes
9.0 /10
1 Votes
Production
9.5 /10 9000
Votes 9000 213 /10
1 Votes
Sundant for work
10.0 /10
2 Votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Reliability
10.0 /10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
2 Votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Productivity
Tact frequency GP
1487MHz
1480MHz
GPU (GPU) has a higher tact frequency.
turbo GPU
2250MHz
1582MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Pixel speed
288 GPixel/s
130.2 GPixel/s
Number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
FLOPS
20.74 TFLOPS
10.6 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
texture size
648 GTexels/s
332 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
GPU memory speed
2000MHz
1376MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
Shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
texture units (TMUs)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene.
More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
effective memory speed
16000MHz
11008MHz
The effective memory clock is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
maximum memory bandwidth
512GB/s
484GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
memory bus width
256bit
352bit
A wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
GDDR versions of
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Features
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a newer version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
version of OpenCL
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
Supports multi-monitor technology
✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)
Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
supports ray tracing
✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
Supports 3D
✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
has HDMI out
✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.
HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TV sets.
HDMI version
HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.0
Newer HDMI versions support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.
Other
Has USB Type-C
✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
USB Type-C has reversible connector orientation and cable routing.
USB connectors
Unknown.