Radeon pro wx7100 1080ti: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 [in 2 benchmarks]

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on GPURace.com

Remove

Remove

Specification

Release Date 2016.11.102017.03.10

Process size 14 nm16 nm

TDP 130 W250 W

Memory type GDDR5GDDR5X

Memory size 8192 MB11264 MB

Memory bus 256 bit352 bit

Bandwidth 224.0 GB/s484.4 GB/s

Benchmarks

Search game and resolution All1920x1080 (Full HD)2560×1440 (WQHD)3840×2160 (4K)

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Passmark G3D
Passmark score

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Battlefield V
(average fps) — Ultra — 1920×1080

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Battlefield V
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440

23

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Battlefield V
(average fps) — Ultra — 3840×2160

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
(average fps) — Highest — 1920×1080

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
(average fps) — Highest — 2560×1440

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Battlefield 1
(average fps) — Ultra — 1920×1080

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Battlefield 1
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Battlefield 1
(average fps) — Ultra — 3840×2160

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
(average fps) — High — 1920×1080

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
(average fps) — High — 2560×1440

21

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
(average fps) — High — 3840×2160

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Bioshock Infinite
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Grand Theft Auto V
(average fps) — Very High — 1920×1080

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Grand Theft Auto V
(average fps) — Very High — 2560×1440

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Grand Theft Auto V
(average fps) — Very High — 3840×2160

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

The Witcher III
(average fps) — Ultra — 1920×1080

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

The Witcher III
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440

22

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

The Witcher III
(average fps) — Ultra — 3840×2160

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Battlefield Hardline
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Middle Earth Shadow of Mordor
(average fps) — Very High — 2560×1440

23

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Middle Earth Shadow of Mordor
(average fps) — Very High — 3840×2160

Pro WX 7100

GTX 1080 Ti

Tomb Raider
(average fps) — Ultra — 2560×1440

Similar products

AMD Radeon R9 270

Open Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Open Compare

AMD Radeon VII

Open Compare

AMD Radeon Pro 580

Open Compare

AMD’s New Radeon Pro Duo and WX 8200 GPUs

AMD’s New Radeon Pro Duo and WX 8200 GPUs | Newegg. com




RADEON PRO DUO

THE POWER OF A DUAL GPU FOR EXCEPTIONAL COMPUTE CAPABILITIES


Outperforming NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1080 Ti by 25% for GPGPU workloads and 20% for rendering in Blender, Radeon™ Pro Duo enables professionals to concurrently drive different applications and workloads on each processor, which helps shorten the design cycle and reduce the time to deadline for their creation.

— Drive one-GPU-per-eye rendering for VR

— Simultaneously create on one GPU while rendering on the other

— Accelerate supported applications with the power of Duo

— Deliver up to 113% faster performance than the Radeon™ Pro WX 7100 in Autodesk Maya with the Radeon ProRender plugin

RADEON PRO WX 8200

TACKLE TOMORROW’S PROFESSIONAL WORKFLOWS TODAY


Today’s projects are becoming more complex and deadlines are often becoming shorter, so professionals need to be able to do multiple things at once to get the job done. The AMD Radeon™ Pro WX 8200 graphics card is designed with the needs of these professionals in mind. Gone are the days where rendering a model would render a workstation unusable for other tasks. The Radeon™ Pro WX 8200’s advanced graphics architecture allows users to render and design at the same time, with up to 13x greater multitasking performance than the NVIDIA Quadro P5000.*












*Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of August 7th, 2018 on a BOXX Apex4 system comprising of an AMD Threadripper 1950X, 32GB DDR4 memory, Microsoft® Windows® 10 64-bit OS, AMD Radeon™ Pro WX 8200 graphics, NVIDIA® Quadro P5000. AMD Radeon™ Pro internal driver 18.20. NVIDIA driver 391.74. Benchmark Applications: SPECviewperf 13 while simultaneously running Blender Cycles benchmark. SPECviewperf 13 results on AMD Radeon™ Pro WX 8200: 3dsmax-06 = 44. 19, catia-05 = 105.72, creo-02 = 68.87, maya-05 = 84.76, snx-03 = 192.20, sw-04 = 72.06.  SPECviewperf 13 results on NVIDIA Quadro P5000: 3dsmax-06 = 4.73, catia-05 = 7.15, creo-02 = 6.59, maya-05 = 6.77, snx-03 = 8.54, sw-04 = 6.31. Performance advantage on SPECviewperf 13: 3dsmax-06 = 44.19/4.73 = 9.3x, catia-05 = 105.72/7.15 = 14.7x, creo-02 = 68.87/6.59 = 10.4x, maya-05 = 84.76/6.77 = 12.52x, snx-03 = 192.2/8.54 = 22.5x, sw-04 = 72.06/6.31 = 11.4x.  Average performance advantage = 9.3+14.7+10.4+12.52+22.5+11.4/6 = 13x. Blender Cycles Benchmark: WX 8200 time to completion = 87 minutes, Quadro P5000 = 119 minutes.  119/87-1 = 36.7% (1.4x) faster rendering performance than P5000 while running SPECViewperf at the same time. For more information about SPECviewperf, see https://www.spec.org/benchmarks.html#gwpg. PC manufacturers may vary configurations, yielding different results. Performance may vary based on use of latest drivers.

©2018 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, Ryzen, Radeon and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

All prices reflect the final price after savings/rebate(s).




Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

versus

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Benefits

Why choose NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

  • % more: 1545 MHz vs 1243 MHz
  • 1243x more texturing speed: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer graphics card production process allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 14nm
  • 2x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 80254 vs 39367
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 115.834
  • 9019 about 71% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 3403. 106 vs 1987.633

  • 2.4x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 24.719 vs 10.152
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 30% more: 136.919 vs 105.263
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 69% more: 1010.818 vs 597.7
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 96% better: 20206 vs 10320
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) about 4% better: 3714 vs 3575
  • performance in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (FPS) is about 96% more: 20206 VS 10320
  • performance in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0 — Manhattan (FPS) about 4% more: 3714 VS 3575
  • 91 Issue date
    13 November 2018 vs 10 November 2016
    Boost core clock 1545 MHz vs 1243 MHz
    Texturing speed 222. 5 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel/s
    Process 12 nm vs 14 nm
    Geekbench — OpenCL 80254 vs 39367
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 282.628 vs 115.834
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3403.106 vs 1987.633
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.719 vs 10.152
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 136.919 vs 105.263
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1010. 818 vs 597.677
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20206 vs 10320
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3575
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3347
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20206 vs 10320
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3575
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3347

    Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

    • About 18% more core clock: 1188 MHz vs 1005 MHz ) more: 7000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
    Core clock 1188 MHz vs 1005 MHz
    Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt vs 160 Watt
    Memory frequency 7000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
    GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

    Geekbench — OpenCL
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    282.628
    115.834
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    3403.106
    1987.633
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    24. 719
    10.152
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    136.919
    105.263
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    1010.818
    597. 677
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
    Geekbench — OpenCL 80254 39367
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 282.628 115.834
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3403.106 1987.633
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.719 10.152
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 136.919 105.263
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1010.818 597.677
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20206 10320
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3575
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3347
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20206 10320
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3575
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3347
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 7878
    PassMark — G3D Mark 7950
    PassMark — G2D Mark 802

    Performance comparison

    NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
    Architecture Turing GCN 4. 0
    Codename TU104 Ellesmere
    Generation GCN Quadro RTX
    Production date November 13, 2018 November 10, 2016
    Price at first issue date $899 $799
    Ranking 89 189
    Type Desktop Workstation
    Price now $539. 99
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 19.25
    Boost core clock 1545 MHz 1243MHz
    Core frequency 1005 MHz 1188 MHz
    Process 12nm 14nm
    Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 222.5GFLOPS
    Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 14.24TFLOPS
    Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7. 119 TFLOPS
    Number of shaders 2304 2304
    Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
    Render output units 64
    Texturing speed 222.5 GTexel/s 179.0 GTexel/s
    Texture Units 144
    Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 130 Watt
    Number of transistors 13600 million 5,700 million
    Floating point performance 5. 728 gflops
    Video connectors 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 4x DisplayPort
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Length 9.5 inches (241 mm) 241 mm
    Additional power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 6-pin
    DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
    OpenCL 1.2
    OpenGL 4. 6 4.5
    Shader Model 6.4
    Vulcan
    Maximum memory size 8GB 8GB
    Memory bandwidth 416.0 GB/s 224.0 GB/s
    Memory bus width 256bit 256 bit
    Memory frequency 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) 7000MHz
    Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
    Shared memory 0
    DisplayPort 1. 3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
    FreeSync
    HDMI 2.0

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: What is the difference?

    67 BALLLA

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    51 BALLLA

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1080 TI

    Winner when compared to

    VS

    56 AMD Radeon RADEON RADION

    NVIDID 9000 NVIDID 9000 NVIDID 9000 NVIDI Why is AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti?

    • 10.14 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
      20.74 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS
    • 157.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      288 GPixel/s vs 130. 2 GPixel/s
    • 624MHz faster memory speed?
      2000MHz vs 1376MHz
    • 4992MHz higher effective clock speed?
      16000MHz vs 11008MHz
    • 45.45% more VRAM?
      16GB vs 11GB
    • 316 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
      648 GTexels/s vs 332 GTexels/s
    • 28GB/s more memory bandwidth?
      512GB/s vs 484GB/s
    • Supports ray tracing?

    Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti better than AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

    • 80W below TDP?
      220W vs 300W
    • 96bit wider memory bus?
      352bit vs 256bit
    • 1 more DisplayPort outputs?
      3 vs 2
    • Has DPFP?
    • 8.8mm lower?
      111.2mm vs 120mm

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    VS

    AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TI

    VS

    NVIDIA GTX 1660 TI

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    9000 VS

    NVIDIA GEFOR RTX0003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    VS

    AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1080 TI

    VS

    NVIDIA T4

    AMD RADEON RX 6800 XT

    VS VS

    MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    Price Matching

    User Reviews Overall Rating

    0017

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    2 reviews of users

    AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    9. 5 /10

    2 Reviews of users

    NVIDIA GTX 1080 TI

    10.0 /10

    1 reviews of users

    Functions

    Price and quality ratio

    9.5 /10

    2 VOTES

    9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Games

    9.0 /10

    2 Votes

    9.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Production

    9.5 /10 9000

    Votes 9000 213 /10

    1 Votes

    Sundant for work

    10.0 /10

    2 Votes

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Reliability

    10.0 /10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

    2 Votes

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Productivity

    Tact frequency GP

    1487MHz

    1480MHz

    GPU (GPU) has a higher tact frequency.

    turbo GPU

    2250MHz

    1582MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    Pixel speed

    288 GPixel/s

    130.2 GPixel/s

    Number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    FLOPS

    20.74 TFLOPS

    10.6 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    texture size

    648 GTexels/s

    332 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    GPU memory speed

    2000MHz

    1376MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    Shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    texture units (TMUs)

    TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    effective memory speed

    16000MHz

    11008MHz

    The effective memory clock is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    maximum memory bandwidth

    512GB/s

    484GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    memory bus width

    256bit

    352bit

    A wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    GDDR versions of

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    Supports memory debug code

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Features

    DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a newer version that supports better graphics.

    OpenGL version

    The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.

    version of OpenCL

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    GPU temperature at boot

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)

    Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    supports ray tracing

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    Supports 3D

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    supports DLSS

    ✖AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    PassMark (G3D) result

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    has HDMI out

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

    HDMI connectors

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TV sets.

    HDMI version

    HDMI 2.1

    HDMI 2.0

    Newer HDMI versions support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    mini DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

    Other

    Has USB Type-C

    ✔AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    USB Type-C has reversible connector orientation and cable routing.

    USB connectors

    Unknown.