Radeon vega onboard graphics: AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 Graphics Card — Benchmarks and Specs

AMD Ryzen 3000 series Processors with Radeon RX Vega Graphics

Ryzen 5 2400GE 3.2GHz 35W 4C/8T AM4 APU with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics

Discontinued

Ryzen 5 3400G 3.7GHz 65W 4C/8T AM4 APU with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics

Discontinued

Ryzen 5 2400G 3.6GHz 65W 4C/8T AM4 APU with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics

Discontinued

Ryzen 3 2200GE 3.2GHz 35W 4C/4T AM4 APU with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics

Discontinued

Ryzen 3 3200G 3.6GHz 65W 4C/4T AM4 APU with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics

Discontinued

Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5GHz 65W 4C/4T AM4 APU with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics

Discontinued

More variations available Show

Replaced by the AMD Ryzen 4000 Series Desktop Processors with Radeon Graphics

Building on the success of the first generation Ryzen processors, AMD have introduced their new latest generation which includes the ground-breaking Radeon RX Vega graphics!

A new type of Ryzen Processor

To date, all AMD Ryzen processors for desktop PCs have been pure CPUs. In other words, they must be paired with a standalone graphics card. However, these AMD Ryzen Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics are a little different — graphics are built right in! You can simply plug your monitor into a compatible motherboard and go — no graphics card needed. The included Radeon Vega graphics are ideal for compact or affordable systems, where system size or budget may not allow for a standalone graphics card.

They have the fastest graphics ever built into a desktop processor

AMD has been building processors with built-in graphics since 2011 but this is their fastest yet! For users thinking about building an affordable gaming system, for example, the AMD Ryzen 5 with Vega 11 graphics is a good place to start. It can easily tackle popular games like DOTA 2, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, CS:GO, or Rocket League. And if you find that you’d like to upgrade to a faster standalone GPU some time later, you can do that! Last but not least, let’s not forget that the built-in graphics have full support for DirectX 12 and Vulkan too.

Radeon Vega graphics are awesome for entertainment

You’ve already seen that these processors can comfortably play games, but games are not the only thing a graphics core can do. People also watch movies and TV shows from all different sources on many different types of monitors. The Radeon Vega graphics built into these new processors handle H.264, HEVC, and VP9 fully in the hardware for smooth, cool and quiet playback. In other words, services like Amazon Instant Video, Hulu, Netflix and YouTube are all handled by dedicated hardware inside the processor. When it comes to monitors, Radeon Vega graphics can handle any display up to 4K UltraHD, even if you also throw in High Dynamic Range (HDR) and Radeon FreeSync technology.

Advanced, High-Performance Processing

Intelligent and revolutionary AMD Ryzen processors are designed to bring you the ultimate, high-performance computing experience. The latest revolutionary AMD multi-threaded processing technology gives you blazing fast performance when you work or play.

True Console Class Gaming Power

Enjoy the most powerful graphics you can get on a desktop processor thanks to Radeon RX Vega processor graphics. The latest, most advanced Vega graphics technology delivers fast, smooth and fluid performance on the games you love to play.

No Compromise

AMD Ryzen Processors with Radeon RX Vega Graphics are armed with some of the most advanced, powerful computing and graphics hardware available today, fused together in a single processor to deliver the high performance you need for demanding work and serious play, without compromise.

AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors

Everyone deserves a powerful processor. Uncompromising features and smooth performance are finally the standard for every gamer and artist with advanced Radeon Vega graphics built-in. The Ryzen 5 processors feature 11 GPU cores to provide the best onboard graphics around so, if you plan to play games on a budget, this is the best CPU to opt for.

AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors

Cutting-edge, true quad-core architecture provides the responsiveness and performance you’d expect from a much pricier PC with advanced Radeon Vega graphics built-in. The Ryzen 3 processors feature 8 GPU cores that provide very good performance. Although Ryzen 3 is capable of providing a reasonable frame rate when playing games, the Ryzen 5 will perform better. If gaming is not required then the Ryzen 3 will be ideal!

Show specifications and reviews for:Ryzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GERyzen 3 3200GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 5 3400G

Specifications Ryzen 3 2200G Ryzen 3 2200GE Ryzen 3 3200G Ryzen 5 2400G Ryzen 5 2400GE Ryzen 5 3400G
Product line AMD Ryzen 3 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics AMD Ryzen 3 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics AMD Ryzen 3 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics
Number of CPU Cores 4 4 4 4 4 4
Number of Threads 4 4 4 8 8 8
Base Clock Speed 3. 5GHz 3.2GHz 3.6GHz 3.6GHz 3.2GHz 3.7GHz
Max Turbo Core Speed 3.7GHz 3.6GHz 4.0GHz 3.9GHz 3.8GHz 4.2GHz
Total L1 Cache 384KB 384KB 384KB 384KB 384KB 384KB
Total L2 Cache 2MB 2MB 2MB 2MB 2MB 2MB
Total L3 Cache 4MB 4MB 4MB 4MB 4MB 4MB
Typical Passmark score 7,356
7,258
8,808 9,526
Graphics Frequency 1100 MHz 1100 MHz 1250 MHz 1250 MHz 1250 MHz 1400 MHz
Graphics Model Radeon Vega 8 Processor Graphics Radeon Vega 8 Processor Graphics Radeon Vega 8 Processor Graphics Radeon Vega 11 Processor Graphics Radeon Vega 11 Processor Graphics Radeon Vega 11 Processor Graphics
Graphics Core Count 8 8 8 11 11 11
Unlocked Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
CMOS 14nm 14nm 12nm 14nm 14nm 12nm
Socket / Package AM4 AM4 (OEM) * AM4 AM4 AM4 AM4
PCI Express Version PCIe 3. 0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
CPU Cooler supplied Yes, Wraith Stealth No, Solutions here Yes, Wraith Stealth Yes, Wraith Stealth No, Solutions here * Yes, Wraith Spire
TDP 65W 35W 65W 65W 35W 65W
Max Temps 105°C 105°C 95°C 105°C 105°C 95°C
Warranty 24 months 24 months 24 months 24 months 24 months 24 months
EAN barcode 0730143309110
0730143309851 0730143309080
0730143309837
  • *Supplied as OEM, a suitable CPU cooler is required
Specifications Ryzen 3 2200G Ryzen 3 2200GE Ryzen 3 3200G Ryzen 5 2400G
Product line AMD Ryzen 3 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics
Number of CPU Cores 4
Number of Threads 4 8
Base Clock Speed 3. 5GHz 3.2GHz 3.6GHz
Max Turbo Core Speed 3.7GHz 3.6GHz 4.0GHz 3.9GHz
Total L1 Cache 384KB
Total L2 Cache 2MB
Total L3 Cache 4MB
Typical Passmark score 7,356
7,258
Graphics Frequency 1100 MHz 1250 MHz
Graphics Model Radeon Vega 8 Processor Graphics Radeon Vega 11 Processor Graphics
Graphics Core Count 8 11
Unlocked Yes
CMOS 14nm 12nm 14nm
Socket / Package AM4 AM4 (OEM) * AM4
PCI Express Version PCIe 3. 0 x8
CPU Cooler supplied Yes, Wraith Stealth No, Solutions here Yes, Wraith Stealth
TDP 65W 35W 65W
Max Temps 105°C 95°C 105°C
Warranty 24 months
EAN barcode 0730143309110
0730143309851 0730143309080
Specifications Ryzen 5 2400GE Ryzen 5 3400G
Product line AMD Ryzen 5 Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics
Number of CPU Cores 4
Number of Threads 8
Base Clock Speed 3. 2GHz 3.7GHz
Max Turbo Core Speed 3.8GHz 4.2GHz
Total L1 Cache 384KB
Total L2 Cache 2MB
Total L3 Cache 4MB
Typical Passmark score 8,808 9,526
Graphics Frequency 1250 MHz 1400 MHz
Graphics Model Radeon Vega 11 Processor Graphics
Graphics Core Count 11
Unlocked Yes
CMOS 14nm 12nm
Socket / Package AM4
PCI Express Version PCIe 3.0 x8
CPU Cooler supplied No, Solutions here * Yes, Wraith Spire
TDP 35W 65W
Max Temps 105°C 95°C
Warranty 24 months
EAN barcode
0730143309837
  • *Supplied as OEM, a suitable CPU cooler is required

Customer Reviews

Ryzen 5 2400GE

Ryzen 5 3400G

Ryzen 5 2400G

Ryzen 3 2200GE

Ryzen 3 3200G

Ryzen 3 2200G

Good service, but.

..

Lance Turner, 20th August 2019

Items were packed ok, shipped quickly, but one of the CPUs had clearly been taken from its protective clamshell as it had visible fingerprints on top. I’m assuming this is not a used chip, that it was either checked or maybe tested before shipping, but it is a concern that the chip has been handled as there is no way to know if proper grounding procedures were used while handling.

It’s good chip

Damian Cirelli, 9th July 2020

Admirable performance from this APU, I really can’t complain, but a powerhouse it is not. Don’t expect it to be on the same level as more powerful Ryzen processors with a discrete graphics card, but for an all-in-one solution, it really performs well. It does hiccup a bit here and there on demanding video editing software but hey, what else do I want!

We haven’t received any reviews of this product yet.

We haven’t received any reviews of this product yet.

We haven’t received any reviews of this product yet.

We haven’t received any reviews of this product yet.

See Also

CPUs (Processors)

Product Resources

  • AMD website

Top AMD AM4 Processors

Spot on customer service

Spot on customer service, packaging and delivery.

(Review via Trustpilot)

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Review: Fastest Integrated Graphics Ever

Skip to main content

Tom’s Hardware is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s why you can trust us.

Your best choice, if you don’t use discrete graphics

(Image: © Tom’s Hardware)

Tom’s Hardware Verdict

If you’re willing to accept lower fidelity and a limited selection of titles, AMD’s Ryzen 7 5700G brings unbeatable 1080p and excellent 1280×720 gaming to iGPUs. However, its less expensive sibling, the Ryzen 5 5600G, is a better value.

Pros
  • +

    + Faster Zen 3 CPU cores

  • +

    + Solid 1080p gaming, excellent 720p

  • +

    + Superior power consumption and efficiency

  • +

    + Expansive overclocking headroom

  • +

    + Bundled cooler

  • +

    + Compatible with some AM4 motherboards

Cons
  • 5600G model has better price-to-performance ratio

  • PCIe 3.0 connectivity

Today’s best AMD Ryzen 7 5700G deals

$359

$238.68

View

Reduced Price

$259

View

$316. 97

$272.29

View

Low Stock

Reduced Price

Show More Deals

The eight-core 16-thread Ryzen 7 5700G marks the arrival of AMD’s first 7nm ‘Cezanne’ Zen 3 APUs for desktop PCs. AMD plans to use the Cezanne chips to plug big price gaps in its Ryzen 5000 lineup that dominates our Best CPU list and CPU Benchmark hierarchy, but they were previously limited to the OEM market until the full retail launch on August 5, 2021. Anticipation was high, though, so we grabbed an off-the-shelf system from HP to take the Ryzen 7 5700G for a spin for an early look at performance. Now we’re back to fill in the final gaps with some additional testing, including CPU overclocking.

The Cezanne chips are the first AMD APUs available at retail since the quad-core Zen+ «Picasso» models landed back in 2019. AMD actually replaced its Picasso chips with the eight-core Zen 2-powered Ryzen Pro «Renoir» series in 2020, but in a disappointing development, it reserved those chips for OEMs. Unfortunately, that means APUs with the aging Zen+ architecture were the best you could find at retail, even though AMD has already progressed through three chip generations in the interim (Zen 2, XT, Zen 3). 

AMD Ryzen 5000 G-Series 65W Cezanne APUs

CPU

Arch. Price Cores/ Threads Base/ Boost Freq. GPU Cores GPU Freq. (MHz) TDP L3 (MB)
Ryzen 7 5700G Zen 3 $359 8 / 16 3.8 / 4.6 RX Vega 8 2000 65W 16
Ryzen 5 5600G Zen 3 $259 6 / 12 3.9 / 4.4 RX Vega 7 1900 65W 16
Ryzen 3 5300G Zen 3 N/a 4 / 8 4. 0 / 4.2 RX Vega 6 1700 65W 8
  • AMD Ryzen 7 5700G at Amazon for $238.68

AMD’s decision to keep those chips off the retail market couldn’t have come at a worse time. The pandemic triggered an unprecedented PC upgrade cycle right as supply chain disruptions and component shortages rocked the globe and cryptomining reemerged, all conspiring to create the most severe GPU shortage in history. With discrete GPUs nowhere to be found, the Renoir chips and their serviceable integrated GPUs would have been a godsend for gamers looking to wait out the GPU shortage, but the shortage found even AMD’s last-gen Picasso chips disappearing entirely from shelves.

AMD launched its Ryzen 5000 chips in the interim, but the company’s pivot to premium pricing exposed two weaknesses in its product stack, including a steep $300 minimum price of entry to the Zen 3 family and a big $150 gap between its Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 families. Unfortunately for AMD, Intel’s Rocket Lake blasted in a few months ago and plugged those pricing gaps, catching AMD uncharacteristically flat-footed.

The Cezanne APUs, which come with Zen 3 execution cores paired with the Radeon Vega graphics engine, look to solve several problems at once. Instead of its traditional separation of the CPU and APU lines, AMD slots the Cezanne chips right into its Ryzen 5000 stack — AMD says they fill the role of the standard «non-X» models that traditionally offer more attractive price points at a given core count by sacrificing peak clock speed for a lower TDP. That means the 5700G should essentially slot in as a Ryzen 7 5800, which doesn’t make a lot of sense given that AMD actually has a Ryzen 7 5800 that is OEM-only. We’ll dive into that a bit more later.

According to AMD, Cezanne is the cure for all of Ryzen 5000’s pricing ills, with the $359 eight-core 16-thread Ryzen 7 5700G plugging the gulf between the Ryzen 7 and 5 lineups, while the $259 six-core Ryzen 5 5600G reduces the steep price of entry to the Zen 3 lineup. Both chips also come with a bundled Wraith Stealth cooler, sweetening the deal.

AMD is still holding back several of its lower-end APUs from the retail market, but given the ongoing graphics card shortages, the Cezanne APUs could be a welcome sight for the gaming market. That is if the chips actually slot in between the performance of their Ryzen counterparts. That’s a tall order given that the tradeoffs associated with their monolithic die design, which differs significantly from the chiplet-based Ryzen 5000 chips. Let’s see how it all works out.

The Overall Benchmark TLDR:

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 1 of 6

We’ll go over the various benchmarks behind these cumulative results in great depth on the following pages, but these slide provide a quick summation of our test results. The first two slides show gaming performance with the integrated GPU and the second two slides show performance when you pair the chips with a discrete GPU. The final two slides show performance in both single- and multi-threaded applications. Be sure to hit the following pages for a more in-depth look at the results, and the final page for our overall analysis. 

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Specifications and Pricing

The Ryzen 5000G family spans from four to eight cores and has the Zen 3 architecture that provides a 19% IPC uplift over the Zen 2 architecture used in the previous-gen Ryzen 4000G models. AMD is only bringing the eight-core 16-thread Ryzen 7 5700G and six-core 12-thread Ryzen 5 5600G to retail, at least for now. In addition, AMD currently hasn’t announced when it will bring the four-core eight-thread Ryzen 3 5300G or the 35W GE-Series models to retail. The didn’t stop us from grabbing a Ryzen 3 5300G and putting it through our test suite, though. However, we won’t see any significant change to our list of Best Cheap CPUs any time soon.  

AMD Ryzen 5000 G-Series 65W Cezanne APUs

CPU

Arch. Price Cores/ Threads Base/ Boost Freq. TDP L3 (MB) GPU Cores GPU Freq. (MHz)
Ryzen 7 5800X Zen 3 $449 8 / 16 3.8 / 4.7 GHz 105W 32 (1×32) N/a N/a
Core i7-11700K (KF) Rocket Lake $374 — $349 8 / 16 3.6 / 5.0 125W 16 UHD Graphics 750 Xe 32EU 1300
Ryzen 7 5700G Zen 3 $359 8 / 16 3.8 / 4.6 65W 16 RX Vega 8 2000
Ryzen 7 4750G Zen 2 ~$310 8 / 16 3.6 / 4.4 65W 8 RX Vega 8 2100
Ryzen 5 5600X Zen 3 $299 6 / 12 3. 7 / 4.6 GHz 65W 32 (1×32) N/a N/a
Core i5-11600K (KF) Rocket Lake $262 (K) — $237(KF) 6 / 12 3.9 / 4.9 125W 12 UHD Graphics 750 Xe 32EU 1300
Ryzen 5 5600G Zen 3 $259 6 / 12 3.9 / 4.4 65W 16 RX Vega 7 1900
Ryzen 5 3600 Zen 2 $200 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.2 65W 32 N/A N/a
Core i5-11400 (F) Rocket Lake $182 — $157 6 / 12 2.6 / 4.2 65W 12 UHD Graphics 750 Xe 24EU 1300
Ryzen 3 5300G Zen 3 N/a 4 / 8 4.0 / 4.2 65W 8 RX Vega 6 1700
Ryzen 5 3400G Zen+ $149 4 / 8 3. 7 / 4.2 65W 4 RX Vega 11 1400

The 65W eight-core 16-thread Ryzen 7 5700G comes with a 3.8 GHz base and a 4.6 GHz boost clock, 16MB of L3 cache, and eight Radeon RX Vega CUs that operate at 2.0 GHz. As with all Zen 3 processors, the Ryzen 5000G chips step up from DDR4-2933 to DDR4-3200 interface, which will help boost gaming performance with the integrated GPU. Compared to the eight-core Ryzen 7 5800X, you gain the Radeon graphics engine but sacrifice 100 MHz of peak boost clocks and half the L3 cache. You also step back from 24 lanes of PCIe 4.0 support to 20 lanes of PCIe 3.0. 

AMD is quite adamant that the Ryzen 5000G chips serve as the new «non-X» models for the Zen 3 family. The $359 Ryzen 7 5700G plugs the sizeable $150 gap between the $449 Ryzen 9 5800X and $299 Ryzen 5 5600X. That gap left Intel’s Core i7-11700K room to operate, but AMD says the 5700G’s performance slots perfectly between the other Ryzen 5000 parts and brings the advantage of the integrated Vega graphics engine. The 65W six-core 12-thread Ryzen 5 5600G comes with a 3.9 GHz base, 4.4 GHz boost, and seven Radeon Vega CUs that operate at 1.9 GHz. We already have a review of the Ryzen 5 5600G here, and we’ll update it with our additional overclocking tests now that the NDA has expired. However, you can see all of the additional tests in this article, too. 

The $256 5600G plugs the gap between the $299 Ryzen 5 5600X and, well, AMD’s entire sub-$299 product stack. AMD’s aging Ryzen 5 3600 is the only real relevant contender in this price range, and it isn’t competitive with Intel’s Rocket Lake Core i5-11600K or Core i5-11400, leaving Intel to reign uncontested in the budget market (as you can see in our recent 11400 vs 3600 faceoff). Based on suggested pricing, the 5600G grapples with the Core i5-11600K, but AMD has yet to address the current value budget champ, the Intel Core i5-11400.

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Cezanne Architecture

AMD’s official Cezanne launch doesn’t have as much deep-dive information as usual, but that’s because most of the architecture is already known: AMD uses the same SoC for the Ryzen 5000 mobile chips and the Ryzen 5000G desktop PC APUs.

The majority of the Ryzen 5000G ‘Cezanne’ SoC comes from the Ryzen 4000 ‘Renoir’ SoC because AMD essentially swapped in new Zen 3 cores, leaving the I/O, 7nm Radeon RX Vega integrated graphics engine and SoC design intact, thus improving time to market.

Naturally, the chip has much more thermal and power headroom in a desktop PC, so AMD tunes multiple variables to tailor the chips for both unique segments, like power consumption, boosting algorithms, and power-sharing between the CPU and GPU. You can read much more about the design and architecture in our AMD Ryzen 5000 Mobile ‘Cezanne’ SoC Deep Dive.

AMD reused the Renoir SoC design, so the 5700G comes with the 7nm Radeon RX Vega graphics engine with eight CUs, and not a newer RDNA-based design. AMD has dialed back the 5700G’s iGPU by 100 MHz compared to the previous-gen 4750G but increased the CPU base/boost clock rates by 200 MHz, suggesting that it tuned the SoC for an optimal balance of CPU and GPU horsepower. AMD had already reworked the graphics architecture for its last go-round with Renoir — the reworked 7nm RX Vega graphics delivered up to 60% percent more performance per compute unit (CU) than its predecessors, equating to more graphics performance from fewer CU.

(Image credit: AMD)

Ryzen 5000G’s monolithic die allows for tighter control of power efficiency and other important characteristics for the mobile space, but it also introduces a few tradeoffs compared to the desktop chips that have a chiplet-based design. For example, unifying all the I/O, cache, and CPU cores, not to mention adding GPU cores, onto a single die inevitability resulted in some sacrifices to meet the company’s performance, power, and area (PPA) targets.

For instance, the Ryzen 7 5700G has 16MB of L3 cache, but that’s half the L3 capacity of the chiplet-based Ryzen 7 5800X for desktop PCs that also comes with eight cores. However, Cezanne does improve over the Renoir APUs — the 5700G has twice the L3 of the eight-core 4750G. 

(Image credit: AMD)

AMD also unified the eight cores and cache into one contiguous 16MB cluster inside the CCX (Core Complex). In contrast, Zen 2 had two four-core clusters, each with 4MB of cache. This larger unified cache improves both core-to-cache and core-to-core latency over the Renoir chips. In addition, for highly-threaded applications, this imparts a 2X cache increase, and lightly-threaded workloads now have access to a full 16MB of cache, equivalent to a 4X increase in directly-accessible cache.

Re-using the Renoir SoC design also means that AMD has stuck with the PCIe 3.0 interface found on all its current-gen APUs. As such, the chip has 20 lanes of PCIe 3.0 connectivity (16 for graphics, four for the chipset, and four for storage) compared to 24 lanes of PCIe 4.0 found on the Ryzen 5000 models for the desktop PC.

The Cezanne desktop chips will find their way into 500-series and some 400-series motherboards, though support on the latter will vary by vendor. 

  • MORE: Best CPUs for Gaming
  • MORE: CPU Benchmark Hierarchy
  • MORE: AMD vs Intel
  • MORE: Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 All We Know
  • MORE: How to Overclock a CPU
  • MORE: How to check CPU Temperature
  • 1

Current page:
Ryzen APUs Level Up

Next Page AMD Ryzen 5 5700G Power Consumption, Overclocking and Thermals

Paul Alcorn is the Deputy Managing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US. He writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage and enterprise hardware.

Tom’s Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site .

©
Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street,
New York,
NY 10036.

Desktop PC | Radeon Vega onboard graphics

Showing 1–7 of 25 results

Trustpilot

Entry Plus Photography PC

SKU: 5060506946566

£654.00 (inc VAT)


  • Contender mATX Workstation Case Blue
  • AMD Ryzen 5 5600G 3.9GHz 6 Core CPU
  • Radeon Vega GPU built in
  • Gigabyte B550M AORUS Elite Motherboard
  • 16GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE LPX 3200MHz
  • 480GB NVME M.2 SSD (2100MB/R, 1600MB/W)
  • 2TB Seagate BarraCuda 3.5″ Hard Drive
  • Arctic Alpine 23 Compact CPU Cooler
  • Contour 400W High Efficiency ATX PSU
  • 1733mbps 802.11ac 2.4 / 5GHz Wi-Fi 5
  • Bluetooth 5 Adapter
  • 24x SATA Internal DVDRW with M-Disk
  • Integrated Sound Card On The Motherboard
  • Microsoft Windows® 11 Home

Details
Customise

Trustpilot

Elite R Gaming PC

SKU: 5060506947013

£593. 00 (inc VAT)


  • Cougar MX410 Mesh G RGB ATX Case
  • AMD Ryzen 5 5600G 3.9GHz 6 Core CPU, Radeon Vega GPU, 4.4GHz Boost
  • Gigabyte A520M S2H Motherboard
  • Standard Graphics Integrated with the CPU
  • 16GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE LPX 3200MHz (2x8GB)
  • 500GB WD Blue SN550 NVME M.2 SSD (2400MB/R, 1750MB/W)
  • Arctic Alpine 23 Compact CPU Cooler
  • Contour 500W High Efficiency ATX PSU
  • 2400mbps 802.11ax AX200 Dual Band PCIe Wi-Fi 6
  • Integrated Sound Card On The Motherboard
  • Microsoft Windows® 11 Home

Details
Customise

Trustpilot

Entry Photography PC

SKU: 5060506948348

£545.00 (inc VAT)


  • Contender mATX Workstation Case Blue
  • AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 3.8GHz 4 Core CPU
  • Gigabyte B450M S2H Ryzen Motherboard
  • Standard Graphics Integrated with the CPU
  • 16GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE LPX 3200MHz
  • 480GB NVME M. 2 SSD (2100MB/R, 1600MB/W)
  • 2TB Seagate BarraCuda 3.5″ Hard Drive
  • Arctic Alpine 23 Compact CPU Cooler
  • Contour 400W High Efficiency ATX PSU
  • 1733mbps 802.11ac 2.4 / 5GHz Wi-Fi 5
  • Bluetooth 5 Adapter
  • 24x SATA Internal DVDRW with M-Disk
  • Integrated Sound Card On The Motherboard
  • Microsoft Windows® 11 Home

Details
Customise

Trustpilot

Entry Gaming PC for Fortnite

SKU: 5060506947372

£501.00 (inc VAT)


  • Cougar MG120-G Compact mATX Case
  • AMD Ryzen 5 5600G 3.9GHz 6 Core CPU, Radeon Vega GPU, 4.4GHz Boost
  • Gigabyte B450M S2H Ryzen Motherboard
  • Standard Graphics Integrated with the CPU
  • 16GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory (2x8GB)
  • 240GB 2.5″ SATA SSD (480MB/R, 420MB/W)
  • Basic AMD CPU Cooler
  • Contour 400W High Efficiency ATX PSU
  • 300mbps 802.11n 2.4GHz Single Band PCIe Wi-Fi 4 Adapter
  • Integrated Sound Card On The Motherboard
  • Microsoft Windows® 11 Home | For delivery on or after October 5th 2021

Details
Customise

Trustpilot

AMD Entry Home Office PC

SKU: 5060506947181

£338. 00 (inc VAT)


  • Contender mATX Workstation Case Blue
  • AMD Athlon 200GE 3.2GHz 2 Core CPU
  • Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
  • Gigabyte B450M S2H Ryzen Motherboard
  • 8GB DDR4 2666MHz Memory (1x8GB)
  • 240GB 2.5″ SATA SSD (480MB/R, 420MB/W)
  • Contour 300W High Efficiency ATX PSU
  • 300mbps 802.11n 2.4GHz PCIe Wi-Fi 4 Adapter
  • Integrated Sound Card On The Motherboard
  • Microsoft Windows® 11 Home

Details
Customise

Trustpilot

AMD Entry Plus Home Office Desktop PC

SKU: 5060506946641

£451.00 (inc VAT)


  • Contender mATX Workstation Case Blue
  • AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 3.8GHz 4 Core CPU, Radeon Vega GPU, 4.0GHz Boost
  • Gigabyte B450M S2H Ryzen Motherboard
  • Standard Graphics Integrated with the CPU
  • 8GB DDR4 2666Mhz Memory (2x4GB)
  • 240GB 2.5″ SATA SSD (480MB/R, 420MB/W)
  • Arctic Alpine 23 Compact CPU Cooler
  • Contour 300W High Efficiency ATX PSU
  • 300mbps 802. 11n 2.4GHz Single Band PCIe Wi-Fi 4 Adapter
  • Integrated Sound Card On The Motherboard
  • Microsoft Windows® 11 Professional

Details
Customise

Trustpilot

Entry Plus Small Business PC

SKU: 5060506946603

£348.00 (inc VAT)


  • Contour LP-2003 Black mATX Case
  • AMD Athlon 200GE 3.2GHz 2 Core CPU
  • Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
  • Gigabyte B450M S2H Ryzen Motherboard
  • 8GB DDR4 2666MHz Memory (1x8GB)
  • 120GB 2.5″ WD Green SATA SSD (540MB/R)
  • Contour 300W High Efficiency ATX PSU
  • Integrated Sound Card On The Motherboard
  • Microsoft Windows® 11 Professional

Details
Customise

Intel DG1 Discrete GPU Goes Up Against AMD Radeon Vega 8 Integrated Graphics Inside A Ryzen System, Fascinating Results Follow

By Huzaifa Haroon July 6, 2022

4 minutes read

Huzaifa is a Global Student Entrepreneur Award winner.

Intel DG1 GPU reference model | Intel

The battle for GPU supremacy between the AMD and NVIDIA has never been more ferocious before. Both giants are throwing everything they’ve got to develop the next-gen hardware in a battle that will dictate customers’ buying patterns for the next 2 years or so. However, a new player has stepped in for the first time in nearly three decades, and it’s a familiar one.

Intel has long tried to create their own line of dedicated graphics to compete with the industry’s duopoly. It helps that the company has had extensive experience in the field developing UHD and Iris Graphics backed up by world-class engineers. Last year, Intel finally made Arc official as its new Graphics brand that will umbrella all of its products and services going forward.

Fast forward to today and the company has launched its first-ever Arc A-Series desktop GPU, the Arc A380. A capable entry-level performer with a competitive price tag, however it’s only available in China for now. A worldwide launch is planned for Arc as a whole later this year, right around the time AMD and NVIDIA begin to introduce their own next-gen designs.

But to get here, Intel had to go through a lot of trial and error, obviously, and Arc had a proper predecessor which helped lay the foundation of what Intel’s next-gen discrete GPUs would be. Some of you may know, Arc is also known as “DG2“. With that information, you can make the connection that there was a DG1, which preceded it. And that’s exactly what we’re talking about today.

DG1 tested in 2022

DG1 was more of a silent launch by Intel since it really wasn’t meant to be a consumer product, it was mostly seen in OEM builds and soon terraformed into Iris Xe MAX, Intel’s premier integrated graphics solution. Even though, no one in their right minds should buy DG1 now and or have anything to do with it, one crazy lad over on Chiphell has done the unthinkable.

User Misaka_9993 has went ahead and purchased a DG1 discrete GPU after they couldn’t bare waiting any longer to get their hands on DG2 for testing, due to its insane prices and limited availability. Regardless, the DG1 was put inside an AMD system with integrated graphics, and pitted against each other. The results are interesting, to say the least.

The tester used an aftermarket DG1 variant from GUNNIR, and it has 80 Execution Units (EUs). Even though it’s not mentioned, Misaka is most likely using the Iris Xe MAX Index V2 model. 

GUNNIR Iris Xe MAX Index V2, Intel DG1 in a retail desktop package | Igor’s Lab

Benchmark overview

The test bench for this comparison was built on the AMD platform using a Ryzen 5 5700G, socketed inside an ASUS ROG X570-I motherboard with Resizable Bar turned on. As some of you may know, the 5700G is an APU so it has a fairly-decent Vega 8 iGPU inside, which the Intel DGI is going up against. Just the notion of seeing a Windows Task Manager with an AMD GPU and an Intel GPU together is honestly insane.

An AMD Ryzen system fitted with AMD Vega 8 iGPU and Intel DG1 discrete GPU | Misaka_9993 via Chiphell

As for the performance, the gaming chops of the DG1 aren’t great, especially because it’s technically not supposed to work on AMD motherboards. Misaka had to boot the system in UEFI mode with CSM disabled for it to turn on. It’s also important to note that DG1 is a PCIe Gen4 x8 card while the Vega 8 is a PCIe Gen3 x16, which means that the system will limit those 16 lanes to just 8 to be on-par with the Intel GPU.

In the AIDA64 GPGPU benchmark, it’s slower than the Vega 8 when it comes to single-precision workloads as AMD’s offering has a roughly 50% higher TFLOP count, at 2.35 TFLOPS vs. 1.58 TFLOPS. It also has significantly higher read and write memory bandwidths, along with being able to handle more IOPS than DG1. In the Julia graphics test, the Vega 8 smokes DG1 by netting almost 200 more frames.

AMD Vega 8 (gfx902) vs. Intel DG1 in AIDA64 | Misaka_9993 via Chiphell

Despite the card’s unimpressive on-paper image, the DG1 packs a lot of media performance when it comes to decoding. When transcoding a 4K60 HEVC Dolby Vision Profile 5 test film to 4K H.264 SDR in Jellyfin, the GPU produced over 120FPS. For context, the GTX 1650 managed to net 130FPS in the same test, so both solutions are very close. 

Furthermore, when conducting the same test with 1080p footage, the DG1 pushed out 210+ FPS, compared to GTX 1650‘s 300FPS, but with a major difference. The GTX 1650 consumed 30-50W during these tests, while the DG1 only consumed about 7-10W, a gargantuan win in efficiency for Intel. Hence, the decoding performance of the DG1 GPU is excellent for its class.


Keep in mind that DG1 was never positioned as a proper option in the sub-$200 entry-level segment, it served as more of a building block for Intel. A necessary step to get to where they really wanted to go, Arc A-Series. If we look at this specific GUNNIR SKU used for the tests, its official successor would be the recently-launched Arc A380 based on ACM-G11 GPU, formerly known as DG2-128 (DG2 generation, 128 EUs). 

It’s fascinating to look back at what Intel achieved with their first modern discrete GPU and how it helped them carve Arc. Even though, DG1 is more than obsolete today, in hindsight it was an instrumental stepping stone for Intel to be able to stand among the big dogs, AMD and NVIDIA. Whether DG2, aka Arc A-Series, is able to give the market leaders a run for their money now remains to be seen, but at least we can confidently say that Intel definitely tried. 

Tags

amdDG2-128EUintelintel arcVega

Radeon RX Vega 7 [in 7 benchmarks]



Radeon RX Vega 7

Buy

  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started Radeon RX Vega 7 sales 7 January 2020. This is Vega architecture notebook card based on 7 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers.

Power consumption is at 15 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at


13.52%

of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.


Radeon RX
Vega 7

vs


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

General info


Of Radeon RX Vega 7’s architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating 320
Place by popularity 11
Value for money 16.16
Architecture Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment Laptop
Release date 7 January 2020 (2 years ago)
Current price $387 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs


Radeon RX Vega 7’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon RX Vega 7’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 448 of 18432 (AD102)
Boost clock speed 1800 MHz of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600)
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm of 4 (h200 PCIe)
Thermal design power (TDP) 15 Watt of 900 (Tesla S2050)

Memory


Parameters of memory installed on Radeon RX Vega 7: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory +

API support


APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega 7, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX 12_1

Benchmark performance


Non-gaming benchmark performance of Radeon RX Vega 7. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


RX Vega 7
13.52

  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • Unigine Heaven 3. 0
3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280×1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%


RX Vega 7
16557

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%


RX Vega 7
5215

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%


RX Vega 7
24721

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 14%


RX Vega 7
3015

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%


RX Vega 7
3325

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%


RX Vega 7
191400

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 5%


RX Vega 7
35


Game benchmarks


Let’s see how good Radeon RX Vega 7 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD 24
1440p 32
4K 18
Popular games
  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset








Cyberpunk 2077 14−16

















































































Assassin’s Creed Odyssey 21


Assassin’s Creed Valhalla 19


Battlefield 5 28


Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23


Cyberpunk 2077 12


Far Cry 5 19


Far Cry New Dawn 13


Forza Horizon 4 14−16


Hitman 3 21


Horizon Zero Dawn 23


Red Dead Redemption 2 15


Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18


Watch Dogs: Legion 17





























































































Assassin’s Creed Odyssey 17


Assassin’s Creed Valhalla 15


Battlefield 5 23


Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18


Cyberpunk 2077 9


Far Cry 5 17


Far Cry New Dawn 12


Forza Horizon 4 14−16


Hitman 3 17


Horizon Zero Dawn 20


Metro Exodus 9


Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16


Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15


The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19


Watch Dogs: Legion 15

























































Assassin’s Creed Odyssey 14−16


Assassin’s Creed Valhalla 14−16


Battlefield 5 21


Cyberpunk 2077 9


Far Cry 5 17


Far Cry New Dawn 11


Forza Horizon 4 14−16


The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13


Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16













































Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16


Hitman 3 14−16


Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16


Metro Exodus 14−16


Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16


Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16


The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16



















































Assassin’s Creed Odyssey 14−16


Assassin’s Creed Valhalla 14−16


Battlefield 5 14−16


Cyberpunk 2077 14−16


Far Cry 5 14−16


Far Cry New Dawn 14−16


Forza Horizon 4 14−16


Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16













































Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16


Hitman 3 14−16


Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16


Metro Exodus 14−16


Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16


Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16


The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16



















































Assassin’s Creed Odyssey 14−16


Assassin’s Creed Valhalla 14−16


Battlefield 5 14−16


Cyberpunk 2077 14−16


Far Cry 5 14−16


Far Cry New Dawn 14−16


Forza Horizon 4 14−16


Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16


Relative perfomance


Overall Radeon RX Vega 7 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.



AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
107.25


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
106.95


AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
101.92


AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
100


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
97.56


AMD Radeon HD 8970M
97.12


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
96.89

NVIDIA equivalent


We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX Vega 7 from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 765M SLI, which is slower by 2% and lower by 6 positions in our rating.


GeForce GTX
765M SLI


Compare


Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX Vega 7:


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
107. 99


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
107.47


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
106.95


AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
100


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
97.56


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
96.89


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
96.75

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


GeForce GTX
1050 Max-Q


Compare


GeForce GTX
1050 Max-Q


Compare


GeForce GTX
1050 Max-Q


Compare


GeForce GTX
1050 Max-Q


Compare


GeForce GTX
1050 Max-Q


Compare


GeForce GTX
1050 Max-Q


Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon RX Vega 7 according to our statistics.


Ryzen 5
5500U

26.6%


Ryzen 5
5600G

14%


Ryzen 5
PRO 4650G

4.9%


Ryzen 5
3500U

4.5%


Ryzen 7
4700U

4.1%


Ryzen 3
3250U

3.2%


Core i3
1115G4

3.1%


Core i5
1135G7

3%


Ryzen 7
5700U

2. 5%


Ryzen 5
5600H

1.5%

User rating


Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about Radeon RX Vega 7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Does Ryzen Have Integrated Graphics?

Integrated graphics cards are an integral part of most budget and mainstream PCs as they enable basic video output capability.

While most Intel CPUs do have integrated graphics, for those interested in AMD system the question remains “does Ryzen have integrated graphics?”

The answer to that question is Yes AND No because whether your Ryzen CPU would have integrated graphics card depends upon what model it is. Not all AMD Ryzen CPUs feature integrated graphics.

Not having an integrated graphics can have a huge impact on how you build your PC.

Without an integrated graphics card, the video output ports on your motherboard will not work and that will compel you to invest in a dedicated graphics card.

In the text below, we will talk in detail about which AMD Ryzen processors have integrated graphics card, how some iGPUs are more powerful than others, and the impact of not having an iGPU on your PC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What is an Integrated Graphics Card?

An integrated graphics card is a graphics card found within a CPU. Unlike the dedicated graphics card, integrated graphics card (iGPU) is NOT a separate stand alone component.

iGPUs are often intended for budget and mainstream PCs that do not have a need for robust graphics processing capability.

As such, they are not nearly as capable as dedicated graphics card and cannot be used for gaming or professional editing/designing workstations.

Why Should You Care About an Integrated Graphics Card?

If your system lacks both integrated graphics and a standalone dedicated graphics card, then your PC will not have any video output capability whatsoever!

Since motherboards DO NOT have onboard graphics processing chip, the video output ports that you find on the back I/O panel of your motherboard are powered by the CPU’s iGPU.

The back I/O ports on this board are powered by the iGPU as the motherboard itself does not have any graphics processing chip. Image: Asrock AMD A320M-HDV R4.0

In other words, the DVI, VGA, HDMI or any other ports found on your motherboard WILL NOT work if your CPU lacks an iGPU. 

If your CPU lacks an iGPU you will be compelled to invest on a dedicated graphics card in order to add basic video output capability to your PC. Thus adding further to the cost of your PC build.

Therefore, you need to have an iGPU as bare minimum in order for you to display stuff on your monitor.

We have an in-depth article on this: Do Motherboards Have Integrated Graphics?

Does Ryzen Have Integrated Graphics?

This brings us to the question in hand “does Ryzen have integrated graphics?”

As answered earlier, NOT ALL AMD Ryzen CPUs have integrated graphics.

AMD Ryzen has separate series for CPUs that do feature an iGPU and those that do not feature an iGPU.

We discuss this below:

What Ryzen CPUs Have Integrated Graphics?

Basically, AMD Ryzen CPUs with the ‘G’ Suffix feature an integrated graphics card from the RX Vega Series.

AMD calls their CPUs with iGPUs APUs or accelerated processing units.

Ryzen CPUs that do not have any suffix, or have ‘X’ or ‘XT’ suffix in their names DO NOT feature an integrated graphics. Examples of Ryzen CPUs that do not feature an iGPU include: AMD Ryzen 5 3500, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, AMD Ryzen 7 3600XT etc

The following is a list of AMD CPUs that DO feature an iGPU.

Series CPU iGPU
Ryzen 2000
Series
Ryzen 3 2200G RX Vega 8
(2000 Series)
Ryzen 5 3400G RX Vega 11
(2000 Series)
Ryzen 3000
Series
Ryzen 3 3200G RX Vega 8
(3000 Series)
Ryzen 5 3400G RX Vega 11
(3000 Series)
Ryzen 3000
Series
Ryzen 3 4300 RX Vega 6
(4000 Series)
Ryzen 3 4350 RX Vega 6
(4000 Series)
Ryzen 5 4600G RX Vega 7
(4000 Series)
Ryzen 5 4650G RX Vega 7
(4000 Series)
Ryzen 7 4700G RX Vega 8
(4000 Series)
Ryzen 7 4750G RX Vega 8
(4000 Series)
Ryzen 5000
Series
Ryzen 3 5300G RX Vega 6
(5000 Series)
Ryzen 5 5600G RX Vega 7
(5000 Series)
Ryzen 7 5700G RX Vega 8
(5000 Series)

Note that despite the integrated graphics card shareing the same name across series, they are not the same in terms of performance. An RX Vega 8 found in 5000 series Ryzen CPUs is far more powerful than the same found in 2000 series Ryzen CPUs. 

Watch this video on YouTube

Also Read: How to Check What Integrated Graphics Do I Have?

How Do the Ryzen iGPUs Compare In Graphics Performance?

Not all iGPUs are equal in terms of performance.

Depending upon what Ryzen CPU you have, the performance of the iGPU can differ.

The following chart shows the performance rating as conducted by notebookcheck.com for different integrated graphics cards.

Note that the while AMD Ryzen CPUs may share the name of the iGPU across generations, their performance can be drastically different. In other words, do not judge the iGPU in the Ryzen CPUs by its name.

For instance, you can see that the RX Vega 8 Graphics as found in 5000 series APU (i.e AMD Ryzen 7 5700G) is far more capable than Vega 8 found on Ryzen 2000 or 3000 series APUs despite them sharing the same name.

GPU Performance Rating*
Vega 3
(R2000/3000)
6.7
Intel UHD 630 6.7
Vega 6
(R2000/3000)
9.4
Vega 8
(R2000/3000)
10.8
Vega 11
(R2000/3000)
13.1
Vega 6
(R4000/5000)
13.6
Vega 7
(R4000)
14.2
Vega 8
(R4000)
15.2
Vega 8
(R5000)
21.6
  • The Performance Rating Scores are taken from notebookcheck. The scores represent an aggregate of 3DMark11, Fire Strike and Time Spy tests. 

Also Read: Build Guide for PC Without Graphics Card

Can AMD Graphics Card Replace Dedicated Graphics Card?

iGPUs are not intended for gaming, or for professional editing works, however, iGPUs have come a long way in terms of their graphical performance – particularly the AMD RX Vega series graphics.

The Vega series graphics as found in the ‘G’ series counterparts are more capable compared to their Intel counterparts and can even be used as a substitute for entry-level dedicated graphics cards.

The following chart shows the G3DMark scores of different graphics card, including both iGPUs and some entry level dedicated graphics cards.

G3D Mark Scores

GPU G3D
Mark
Notes
Intel UHD 630 1395 As found on 8-10th Gen
Intel CPUs
Nvidia GeForce
GT 740
(MSRP $79)
1543 Dedicated GPU
Basic
Intel UHD 750 1684 As found on 11th Gen+
Intel CPUs
AMD Radeon
Vega 3
(2018 Version)
1071 AMD 2000 Series APU
AMD Radeon
Vega 6
(2018 Version)
1274 AMD 2000 Series APU
AMD Radeon
Vega 8
(2018 Version)
1704 AMD 2000 Series APU
Intel Iris Pro 580 2044 Found on premium laptops.
AMD Radeon
Vega 11
(2018 Version)
2139 AMD 2000 Series APU
Intel UHD 770 2432 As Found on 12th Gen Intel CPUs.
Nvidia GeForce
GT 1030
($79)
2613 Dedicated GPU
Entry Level
AMD Ryzen 5
5600G
Vega 7 Graphics
2639 Integrated as found on the Ryzen 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7
5700G
Vega 8 Graphics
2708 Integrated as found on the Ryzen 5700G
AMD Radeon
RX 550
($79)
2764 Dedicated GPU
Entry Level

You can see here that the more powerful AMD Vega 8 graphics as found in AMD Ryzen 7 5700G has the same performance score as that of dedicated AMD RX 550 or NVIDIA GT 1030 graphics cards.

We also recommend you read the following articles:

  • Does Your PC Need a Graphics Card If Its Not for Gaming?
  • Is Integrated Graphics Card Good Enough?

The following charts shows how the AMD Ryzen 7 as found on AMD Ryzen 5 5600G performs in some of the popular games:

AMD RX Vega 7 (4000-5000 series CPUs). Source: Notebookcheck

The chart shows the FPS on different graphics settings for various games. Often anything above 30 FPS is considered playable.

Also Read: Can You Replace an Integrated Graphics Card?

Performance of Ryzen CPUs with iGPU vs Ryzen CPUs WITHOUT iGPUs

When it comes to sheer single and multicore CPU performance, the non-GPU variants have an upper hand.

The following charts show how the performance of non-‘G’ series Ryzen CPU compare with ‘G’ series Ryzen CPUs.

CPU Passmark

Here you can see that AMD Ryzen CPUs WITHOUT iGPUs are much more powerful in comparison to ‘G’ series CPUs with iGPUs when it comes to sheer processor performance.

Even the weaker AMD Ryzen 3 3100 (MSRP $100) is much more powerful compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3400G (MSRP $150).

The only two exceptional ‘G’ series processors worth mentioning in terms of CPU performance and overall value are the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G. They not just offer a great graphics card, but also an excellent CPU performance.

Again, if you choose to go for AMD Ryzen non-G series CPUs, you will need to invest in a dedicated graphics card as the video output ports on the motherboard’s back I/O panel will not work.

Also Read: Do You Need a Graphics Card for Minecraft?

FAQ

What Ryzen CPUs Have Integrated Graphics?

The ‘G’ series Ryzen CPUs, aka APUs, have integrated graphics card.

Also Read: Difference Between APU vs GPU

Does the Ryzen 7 3700x Have Integrated Graphics?

No, this CPU does not feature an integrated graphics.

Does Ryzen 5 5600x have Integrated Graphics?

No, this CPU does not have an integrated graphics.

Does Ryzen 3600 have Integrated Graphics?

No, this CPU does not have an integrated graphics.

Also Read: How to Disable Integrated Graphics Card?

fast integrated graphics but mediocre speed with external GPU

This material was written by a site visitor and rewarded for it.

Gaming graphics cards are becoming more expensive every month, so more and more people around the world are switching to game consoles or video cards from the secondary market. But there is also a third option — integrated graphics, which have evolved decently in recent years, allowing you to play many modern games at minimum settings.

Features of integrated graphics of different generations

Consider the possibilities of modern integrated graphics in games, these will be both old projects that are still played by millions of players, and the latest innovations.

There is one key difference between conventional and processor-integrated video cards. This is the presence of its own video memory for discrete cards, and the use of RAM for integrated ones. This leads to the conclusion that for integrated graphics, only fast RAM operating in dual-channel mode is recommended. Dual channel mode doubles the bandwidth of RAM and increases FPS in games by about 20-30%.

recommendations

Do not save on the frequency of RAM. So the price difference between DDR4 modules with a frequency of 2133 MHz and 3200 MHz is quite modest, but fast memory will increase performance in games by 10-15%.

Integrated graphics takes up to 2 GB of RAM for its needs. This volume is determined automatically by default, but it can be forced to set in the BIOS. So for Vega 8 with an AMD Ryzen 3 2200G processor, it is set in the range from 256 MB to 2 GB.

Therefore, computers and laptops with 4 or 8 GB of slow RAM (below 3200 MHz) are not suitable for games on the integrated video card, especially if this memory is one module. They just won’t reveal its performance to 100%.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (aka UHD Graphics 620 for ultrabooks) became the most popular integrated graphics. Moreover, it appears even in the minimum requirements for many popular games. But unfortunately, this is far from the most productive solution, although it will pull all 3 parts of S. T.A.L.K.E.R (the new part, which will be released in April 2022, will not pull), it will go without problems to the first Witcher, Doom 3, and even Crysis, which for its time was considered hard game.

Among the integrated graphics there are also purely office solutions that are not designed for games, except for very old ones. These are Intel UHD Graphics 610 (simplified 630) and Radeon Vega 3, which is almost twice as productive.

For undemanding games, Radeon Vega 8, 10 and 11 are suitable, which are already close in performance to the budget video cards of previous years Nvidia GT 1030 or AMD RX 550.

Outperforms the Intel UHD Graphics 630 by 2-3 times, but has fewer stream processors than their predecessors. The situation was saved a little by raising the GPU clock frequency by one and a half times. As a result, due to savings on stream processors, there was no breakthrough, and the new Vega 6 is approximately equivalent to the old Vega 8, the new Vega 7 corresponds to the old Vega 10, and the new Vega 8 competes with the old Vega 11.

Later, Radeon Vega was released in the Ryzen 5000 series processors. As an example using integrated graphics, here is a build video based on a Ryzen 5 5600G processor with a Radeon Vega 7 (3rd generation).

Also released Ryzen 7 5700G with Radeon Vega 8 (third generation), which is the leader among AMD processors as of January 2022.

Don’t forget that old Ryzen processors support memory up to 3200-3400 MHz. The new ones (4000-5000 series of processors) can run at 3600-3800 MHz, which increases their performance in games by another 5-7% FPS.

Blue’s situation is also difficult. So in the eleventh generation Intel processors (Rocket Lake), UHD Graphics 750 is already installed on the new Xe architecture. But at the same time, in the CPU for ultrabooks it has up to 96 computing units, and in desktops it was left with only 32. As a result, it is one and a half times more powerful than the UHD 630, but inferior to Vega 6. new generation of DDR5, with higher frequency and bandwidth, it promises to take the performance of integrated graphics cards to a new level. For example, it will be possible to play modern games no longer at the minimum, but at medium settings, which will allow you to take part in eSports tournaments. This will allow the new generation of integrated graphics to finally compete with budget graphics cards. And not only with the so-called plugs, suitable only for office work, but entry-level gaming video cards. There will be gaming computers and laptops based on new generations of integrated graphics.

I also hope that integrated graphics will be able to allocate more RAM than 2 GB for their needs. In modern realities, you need from 4 to 6 GB. That’s when configurations with 32 GB of RAM will become relevant.

Visual comparison of AMD integrated graphics performance. And, these are not all options, there are many more. And now they are the same, but in comparison in terms of performance.

A visual comparison of the characteristics of integrated graphics from Intel. And there are many more. And now they are the same, but in comparison in terms of performance. And now they are the same, but in comparison in terms of performance.

Let’s take for comparison the performance leaders from red and blue. These will be the desktop AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000) in the Ryzen 7 Cezanne 5700G processor. Notebook graphics Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU in the Intel Core i5-1130G7 processor, and desktop graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 (aka 750, which is much more tested), in the 12th generation Alder Lake processors: Intel Core i5-12600K, Core i7-12700K, Core i9-12900K . And let’s compare them with the desktop NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030. And now they are the same, but in comparison in terms of performance.

Now, to understand the usefulness of integrated graphics, let’s look at the most popular games on Steam, by the number of players. And in most of them, the integrated graphics can hit 30+ FPS on low or medium settings.

On November 4, 2021, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 was released on the Generation 12.2 architecture and 10 nm process technology. It is very close in parameters to the Intel UHD Graphics 750, but differs in support for 8K images (resolution 7680×4320 pixels), which can be transmitted via Display Port.

Conclusions: If you do not save on stream processors, while maintaining a high clock speed, using high-speed DDR5 RAM in dual-channel mode, you can get high-performance integrated graphics at the level of a GTX 1650 laptop video card.

Thanks to tech blogger Stanislav for his PC assembly video. Who liked the video, subscribe to his channel «I decided so.»

This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.

how to wait out hard times? GECID.com. Page 1

::>Video cards
>2021
> AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Vega 8 and Vega 3 comparison in 2021: how to ride out the hard times?

27-04-2021

Page 1
Page 2
One page

The processors presented in the test are not the only ones in AMD’s arsenal with an integrated video core. There are PRO versions of the Ryzen 3000G and 4000G series on the market. The latter switched to the 7nm Zen 2 architecture, which guarantees a noticeable performance bonus, but they are also more expensive. You can look at the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G and its iGPU test for more details. The more expensive Ryzen 5000G line with Zen 3 architecture has already debuted this year. 0007

Ryzen 5 3400G, Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon 240GE are cheaper and popular among mainstream users.

We recently got some fresh material with a Ryzen 5 3400G build. Recall that the processor combines 4 cores in 8 threads with the Radeon RX Vega 11 video core. The maximum frequency for CPU cores is 4.2 GHz, and for iGPU — 1.4 GHz.

More affordable is Ryzen 3 3200G . It also has 4 cores, but only 4 threads. The maximum frequency is 4 GHz. The Radeon Vega 8 video core has 512 stream processors instead of 704 for its older brother. Yes, and its operating frequency is lower — 1250 MHz.

They really wanted to test the youngest video core Radeon Vega 3 on the example of Athlon 3000G, but all of them were sold out from partners. Available was Athlon 240GE . There are minimal differences between them: the same 2 Zen cores in 4 threads with a frequency of 3. 5 GHz, but the 3000G has an unlocked multiplier — you can overclock. The video core in both cases received 192 stream processors, although the Athlon 240GE is 100 MHz slower. Therefore, in general, Athlon 3000G is a bit more interesting.

The test stand was left over from the previous build. We decided not to disassemble it to save time, although you can take more budget components for Ryzen 3 and Athlon.

The stand is based on the ASUS TUF B450-PRO GAMING motherboard, primarily due to the support of all processors available on the market, from Ryzen 1000 to Ryzen 5000. In extreme cases, you only need to update the BIOS version. It differs from budget models based on the A320 or even on the B450 chipset with a reinforced power subsystem and a good cooling system so that you can install powerful top-end processors on it.

Cooling was entrusted to the Xilence M403PRO tower with a large radiator, three 6mm heat pipes and a 120mm FDB-bearing fan. Therefore, it is quieter and more efficient than boxed versions.

RAM overclocking provides a nice performance bonus for the Socket AM4 platform. Especially in the budget segment. The selected 2-channel kit PATRIOT VIPER STEEL is not too expensive, and in return it is guaranteed to take the DDR4-3200 frequency.

The operating system, programs and some games are recorded on M.2 PCIe SSD PATRIOT P300 .

We also added a 2 terabyte PATRIOT P210 to the system with all other games for easy testing.

At the second stage, we will install a discrete video card, so we left the power supply with a margin — Xilence XP650R10 with a total power of 650 watts. It stands out with the 80 PLUS Bronze 230V certificate, semi-modular flex cables and a nice design with a red FDB-bearing turntable.

The system was assembled in not the most expensive, but neat case FSP CMT120A . It supports ATX and microATX motherboards, 155mm high CPU coolers and 340mm video cards.

It does not have its own turntables, so they added one 120mm from Xilence to improve the temperature regime.

On APU with integrated video core, we do not use all the features of GIGABYTE M27F Gaming Monitor . But after adding a powerful graphics card, we will be able to better experience the benefits of a 1ms matrix and a refresh rate of 144Hz. It also supports HDR content and has an increased coverage of DCI-P3 and sRGB color spaces, so it does an excellent job with amateur photo and video processing.

It’s also the world’s first multi-system KVM gaming monitor. For example, you can connect a laptop, tablet, or smartphone via the USB Type-C interface to display an image on a 27-inch screen.

Gameplay recorded by external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K , i.e. without loss of performance.

Let’s move on to the test. This time, on a system with Vega 11, some games were running at lower graphics settings so that when comparing on Vega 3, there was no explicit slideshow. But if you are interested in the full potential, then see the past material.

Let’s start with Apex Legends . For the sake of Vega 3, they dropped to a low preset at 9 resolution00p to get an average of 24 FPS. Vega 8 raises the performance by 2.5 times to a comfortable 60 FPS on average. Switching from Vega 8 to Vega 11 guarantees a minimum bonus of 16%.

In CS: GO , a similar situation is observed, however, it can be played even on Vega 3 in Full HD at a low preset. The average frame rate is around 60 FPS. Vega 8 improves all indicators by more than 2 times. But the advantage of Vega 11 over Vega 8 does not exceed 12%.

An interesting situation happened in DOOM Eternal : the rate of very rare events in the system with Vega 8 turned out to be higher than with Vega 11. Perhaps the higher frequency of processor cores in Ryzen 3 or the features of optimizing the project for multithreading played a role . But on Athlon it is extremely hard to play.

In Dota 2 , in general, all indicators of Vega 8 are higher than those of Vega 11. The increase is small — only 4-5%. Yes, and in the gameplay itself, it is not felt, but monitoring fixed it. We suspect that the reason lies in the optimization of the game for multithreading. Owners of Vega 3 will also appreciate the pleasant gameplay with an average speed of over 60 frames / s.

Forza Horizon 4 even at 900p is heavy to embed. On Vega 11 we get about 80 frames / s on average, but with subfreezes and a drop in the statistics of very rare events below 15 FPS. If you save and take the Ryzen 3 3200G, then the figures will drop by 13-16%. And when you run the game on Athlon 240GE, in some places there is a 2-fold drop in some results compared to Ryzen 3.

0013 Fortnite or spoil his nervous system, then build him a system with Athlon. Even at a resolution of 1600×900 with a low preset, we got lags and drops in the statistics of very rare events up to 10 FPS. With Vega 8, the performance will be at least 2 times better. Replacing Ryzen 3 with Ryzen 5 promises a bonus of at least 14%.

GTA V was created without any particular focus on multi-threading — the game prefers processors with good single-thread performance. And again, the increased core frequency of Ryzen 3 played a role. As a result, Vega 8 is a maximum of 9% bypasses Vega 11, although we did not notice any difference in gameplay.

League of Legends is well optimized for weak systems. In Full HD on Vega 3, it gives out more than a hundred FPS on average, but random friezes slip through from time to time. The advantage of Vega 8 is not so big anymore — 11-25%. In turn, Vega 11 breaks away from second place by a maximum of 20%. Although even with Ryzen 5, the video sequence is not without freezes.

If you want to play PUBG on Vega 3, you will have to go down to a very low preset at 900p. But do not hope for a miracle, because the game is on the verge of slowing down. Pleases only responsive control. With Vega 8 you can expect about 60 FPS, and with Vega 11 the frame rate tends to 70.

Vega 8 provides comfortable gameplay in Rainbow Six Siege at a low preset in Full HD. Here, even the statistics of very rare events is kept around 60 frames / s. When switching to Vega 3, the indicators will drop by more than 2 times and Input lag will appear in the control. In turn, Vega 11 will provide a 10-15% bonus compared to Vega 8.

Total War Saga: Troy on Athlon 240GE noticeably slows down, because even the average speed drops below 20 fps. Still, 2 cores in 4 threads and iGPU Vega 3 is not enough for this game. But with Ryzen 3, the frame rate rises above 40 FPS. Switching to Ryzen 5 improves performance by another 9-14%.

Valorant will not let Vega 3 owners feel sad on snowy April evenings. In Full HD, at a low preset, the statistics of rare and very rare events stay above 85 fps. Of course, with Vega 8 on board, we get higher performance — an increase in average speed is 61%. And if you exchange Vega 8 for Vega 11, you will get a great bonus on stats 1 and 0.1% Low — at least 48%.

Warframe runs comfortably on Ryzen 5 in Full HD at a low preset. Occasionally there are blunting. With the transition to Ryzen 3, the indicators decrease by a maximum of 24%, but remain normal. You can even play Athlon if you have 40 FPS on average and freezes at the beginning of the battle don’t bother you.

But with the unforgettable classic in the face of The Third Witcher things are not very good. With Vega 8, at a low preset of 720p, the game slows down at first, loading the necessary objects. Switching to Vega 11 won’t make much of a difference, but the performance will increase by almost 20%. Vega 3 handles the game 2 times worse than Vega 8.

But fans of World of Tanks will be able to run any marathon on Vega 3 if they have free time and strong nerves in order to calmly perceive the actions of teammates, rivals and artillery guides. With Vega 8, the performance bonus reaches 114%. The gap between Vega 11 and Vega 8 is not so big anymore — about 7-13%.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS Vega 8 integrated graphics test in games

With new Ryzen 9 49 processor00HS AMD has taken an impressive step forward, making life difficult for the competitor. Especially in terms of multi-threaded performance and rendering speed, even if these tasks are more relevant for mobile workstations. But in other areas, AMD was able to make significant progress compared to previous generations. For example, with integrated graphics, we got an increase of up to 30%. Let’s see how comfortable you can play on the integrated Vega 8 graphics of the Ryzen 9 4900HS processor.

AMD was able to put up a worthy competitor to the most popular Intel Core i7-9 gaming laptop processor750H, but compared to the first mobile 8-core Core i7 processor, namely the Intel Core i7-10875H (test), AMD Renoir performed well in our tests. The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS processor (test) is equipped with eight Zen 2 cores, they provide a decent level of performance in multi-threaded environments and rendering applications. Here AMD managed to remove Intel from the throne, especially since the 7nm process has a positive effect on efficiency.

But AMD is also claiming a major improvement and acceleration of integrated Vega graphics in Renoir processors. Previously, AMD also boasted an advantage here, since Intel chips were still inferior to AMD in gaming performance when using integrated graphics.

Compared to the previous generation, AMD has reduced the number of Compute Units from eleven to just eight. Which corresponds to only 512 stream processors instead of 704 before. But AMD promises a 59% performance improvement for individual CUs. According to FP32 calculations, performance increased from 1.41 to 1.79 TFLOPS, that is, almost 30%.

AMD

increased the maximum clock speed of the iGPU quite significantly — from 1.400 MHz to 1.750 MHz, while supporting faster memory provides an increase in bandwidth. The built-in Vega iGPUs take some of the RAM for video memory, and here the Renoir memory controller now supports LPDDR4X-4200 with a bandwidth of 68.3 GB / s. However, many laptop manufacturers use DDR4-3200 memory, which still gives an increase compared to Ryzen 3000 models equipped with DDR4-2400.

Additional improvements are related to the Data Fabric of the Infinity Fabric interconnect, here AMD has doubled the bandwidth in Renoir to increase the speed of data exchange between individual Compute Units. According to AMD, Infinity Fabric is now 75% more efficient. Moreover, the increase in power consumption was avoided due to the transition to 7 nm technology.

Subscribe to the Hardwareluxx VKontakte and Facebook groups, as well as to our Telegram channel (@hardwareluxxrussia).

Ryzen 4000 Mobile H and HS Series
Model Cores/Threads Base frequency/Boost L3 cache GPU GPU frequency TDP
Ryzen 9 4900H 8 / 16 3.3 / 4.4 GHz 8MB Vega 8 1.750 MHz 45 W
Ryzen 9 4900HS 8 / 16 3.0 / 4.3 GHz 8MB Vega 8 1.750 MHz 35 W
Ryzen 7 4800H 8 / 16 2. 9 / 4.2 GHz 8MB Vega 7 1.600 MHz 45 W
Ryzen 7 4800HS 8 / 16 2.9 / 4.2 GHz 8MB Vega 7 1.600 MHz 35 W
Ryzen 5 4600H 6 / 12 3.0 / 4.0 GHz 8MB Vega 6 1.500 MHz 45 W
Ryzen 5 4600HS 6 / 12 3.0 / 4.0 GHz 8MB Vega 6 1.500 MHz 35 W

We’ve already tested the Ryzen 9 4900HS processor, but we’re using modern gaming hits that aren’t optimally suited to integrated graphics like the Renoir Vega 8, as the frame rate is below acceptable levels. Therefore, for the current test, we took less demanding, but still popular games, or weakened the graphics settings. Among other things, we will test in Dota 2, Grand Theft Auto 5, Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds, FIFA 20, as well as The Shadow of Tomb Raider and The Witcher 3.

For comparison, we have shown the results of other iGPUs. In particular, we have tested Vega 11 in Ryzen 5 3400G (test) and Vega 3 in AMD Athlon 3000G (test).

<>Vega 8 Integrated Graphics AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS Gaming Test
Test Laptop

Review and Test AMD Vega Integrated Graphics for Notebooks

AMD Vega Integrated Graphics Review and Test for Notebooks

Material Information
Category: Graphics cards AMD

Views: 19940

Often, when buying a laptop, you have to solve one important problem, especially if you buy a laptop not only for surfing the Internet and working with office applications, but also for computer games. Of course, you can immediately pay attention to laptops with a discrete video card such as Nvidia Ge Force GTX 1050 or AMD RX 560X, or you can try to limit yourself to only the graphics core built into the processor. Many people think that the integrated video core is low-power and is only suitable for office work and very simple games, and that’s exactly what it was before the advent of integrated AMD Vega video cards, which are installed even in competing company processors. In this article, we will try to compare the performance of AMD Vega integrated graphics in laptops with entry-level discrete graphics cards, it will be interesting to see if AMD graphics adapters can compete with discrete graphics cards.

Before jumping straight into today’s contenders, let’s highlight some of the features of AMD’s Radeon RX Vega integrated graphics. This series of integrated video cards uses Vega architecture cores, which belong to the fifth generation of GCN (Graphics Core Next) and are manufactured using the 14 nm FinFET manufacturing process. Interestingly, AMD Radeon RX Vega lacks the Boost function, which increases the GPU frequency compared to the base one, so you have to forget about hardware overclocking of the Vega graphics core built into the processor, the only exceptions are the top Vega M GH and Vega M GL which are built into Intel processors. AMD integrates graphics in a variety of ways, from the most powerful Vega M GH with its own HBM2 memory to the budget Vega 3 chip, which, due to the lack of its own, uses the laptop’s RAM. At the same time, we note that the configuration of stream processors in AMD Radeon RX Vega for laptops practically corresponds to the desktop version of video cards based on the Vega architecture. As for the supported standards, there is no difference between the desktop GPU and the APU: DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenCL 2.2, OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.0, so the Raven Ridge graphics are quite modern. The maximum display resolution is 3840 x 2160 pixels at 60Hz.

The most productive video cards adjacent to processor cores on the same substrate at the moment are Radeon RX Vega M GH and Radeon RX Vega M GL. The first is equipped with 24 computing units and 1536 stream processors, the base frequency of the Vega M GH graphics chip is nominally 1063 MHz, and in overclocking mode it can be increased to 1190 MHz. The RX Vega M GH graphics chip is equipped with 4 GB of HBM2 memory (4-hi stack) connected directly to it using Intel EMIB technology. The HBM2 memory frequency is 800 MHz, which provides a throughput of up to 204.8 GB per second. This is half that of the desktop Radeon RX Vega 56 (410 GB / s) equipped with two stacks of 4-hi HBM2 memory for a total of 8 GB. The pure GPU performance of the Radeon RX Vega M GH (peak 3.7 TFLOPS) is between the Radeon RX 560 (2.6 TFLOPS) and the RX 570 (5.1 TFLOPS). Radeon RX Vega M GH can be found in Intel Core i7-8809 processorsG and Core i7-8709G. The second most powerful Radeon RX Vega M GL can be found in Intel Core i7-8706G, Core i7-87505G, Core i5-8305G processors. The Vega M GL graphics processor has 20 computing units with 1280 stream processors, operating frequencies, unlike the older version, are lowered to 931 and 1011 MHz. The 4GB HBM2 memory is clocked at 700MHz for a bandwidth of 179.2GB/s. The memory chip is connected to the GPU by a 1024-bit bus, as is the case with the older version. The wide backbone provides more bandwidth even with the relatively low operating frequency of the HBM2. The performance of this graphics module is 2.6 Tflops, which is close to the desktop RX 560.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Stream Processors Stream processors
Clock frequency Clock frequency

1063-1190 MHz

931-1011MHz
Memory type Memory type

8 GB HBM2

4 GB HBM2

If the first two video cards were an integral part of intel processors, then RX Vega 11, Vega 10, Vega 8, Vega 6, Vega 3 graphics chips are part of AMD processors and have rather modest performance, unlike Vega M GL and Vega M GH. At the same time, mobile processors equipped with RX Vega 11, Vega 10, Vega 8, Vega 6, Vega 3 graphics do not differ much from desktop versions based on Zen and Vega chips at the microarchitecture level. The changes concern only those areas that are critical specifically for the mobile segment. Developers, for example, cut L3 caches down to 4 MB, just to keep the die size down. HBM memory also had to be abandoned — therefore, for the needs of the built-in graphics core, the main memory of the DDR4 standard laptop is used.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Stream Processors Stream processors
Clock frequency Clock frequency

1250 MHz

1300 MHz
Memory type Memory type

uses laptop memory

uses laptop memory

So, Vega 11 is part of the Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G processors. Both processors have 4 processing cores, while the older model has support for SMT technology, which allows you to simultaneously process up to 8 threads. The Ryzen 5 2400G has a base clock of 3.6GHz with a dynamic clock boost of up to 3.9GHz. The Vega 11 graphics unit contains 704 compute units, 44 texture units and 16 raster units. Its maximum frequency is 1250 MHz. There is support for DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1, OpenGL 4.6, Open CL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.0, Next comes the Vega 10 GPU, which, due to the reduced number of computing units of only 640, is inferior in performance to Vega 11, despite the increased frequency to 1300 MHz in boost mode. Note that the graphics chip is part of the Ryzen 7 2700U processor.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Stream Processors Stream processors Stream processors
Clock frequency Clock frequency Clock frequency

1100 MHz

1100 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type Memory type Memory type

uses laptop memory

uses laptop memory uses laptop memory

Next in the rankings is the AMD Radeon Vega 8 graphics chip, which, like its older brothers, is built into AMD processors, it found its place in the Ryzen 2200G processor. This processor positions itself not only as an exclusively office or multimedia solution, but also as a product for picky gamers who do not pursue the most modern games and maximum graphics. The performance of Vega 8 lies between the MX110 and MX130 graphics cards — that is, we are talking about a very inexpensive and simple solution that is only architecturally in the same family with the flagship Vega solutions. The name Vega 8 indicates that this graphics chip received 8 computing units, which translates into 512 stream shader processors operating at a frequency of 1100 MHz. AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 and Vega 3, which are used in AMD Ryzen 3 processors, close the lineup. RX Vega 6 is built on the Vega architecture and uses 384 shaders out of 704 possible, the operating frequency reaches 1100 MHz versus 1250 for RX Vega 11. RX Vega 3 uses modern Vega architecture (GCN generation 5) and has three shader clusters, that is, 192 computing cores. The frequency can be up to 1000 MHz.

Testing

3DMark Fire Strike is a beautifully popular DirectX 11 API-enabled application for testing PCs with high performance gaming graphics cards in a Windows environment. The 3DMark Fire Strike results help evaluate the relative performance of the graphics card and its suitability for the most demanding PC games.


3D Mark Fire Strike Graphics (1920 x1080)


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (Intel Core i7-8709G)

10248

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050Ti (Intel Core i5-8300H)

8376

AMD Radeon RX VEGA M GL (Intel Core i7-8709g)

7333

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Intel Core i5-8300h)

6341

AMD Radeon RX 560X (AMD RyZen 7 2700x

Nvidia GeForce MX150 (Intel Core i5-8250U)

3739

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)

3599

Nvidia GeForce MX130 (Intel Core i5-8250U)

2445

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (AMD Ryzen 7 2700U)

2469

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (AMD Ryzen 3 2200G)

2036

Nvidia GeForce MX110 (Intel Core i5-8250U)

1732

AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (AMD Ryzen 3 2300U)

1506

UHD Intel Graphics 630 (Intel Core i7-8086K)

1439

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (AMD Ryzen 3 3200U)

1301

UHD Intel Graphics 620 (Intel Core i7-8086K)

1343

Video card overview Radeon Vega 7

Description

Specifications

5

2020
Segment integrated graphics core
Base frequency 300 Mhz
Game frequency
Turbo Frequency 1600-1900 Mhz*
Tire
Memory capacity dynamic, up to 2 GB
Stream Processors 448
Texture blocks 28
Rasterizers 7
Architecture (core) GCN 5. 0
Process 7nm
TDP 10W(mob), 45W

* — maximum frequency varies depending on the model

Supported APIs, technologies: OpenCL 2.0, OpenCL 4.6, DirectX 11, DirectX 12, Shader Model 6.0, AMD FreeSync
Supported operating systems: Windows 10 x86-x64, Linux x86-x64

In which processors are used: Ryzen 5 Pro 5650G, Ryzen 5 5600G, Ryzen 5 5600ge, Ryzen 5 5600h, Ryzen5 5600hs, Ryzen 5 5600u, Ryzen 5 5500U Ryzen 7 4800h, Ryzen 7 4700u, Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

9000 9000 9000 Radeon Vega 7 graphics core

The Radeon Vega 7 graphics core (GPU) appeared in 2020 as part of AMD’s mid-budget desktop and mobile APUs. The GPU is made according to technological standards of 7nm and carries the GCN 5.0 architecture, has a base frequency of 300 megahertz and a maximum frequency of up to 1900 megahertz (depending on the model, the figure varies). The graphics core does not have its own video memory, but takes memory from the RAM (no more than two gigabytes), which makes the graphics subsystem extremely dependent on the RAM frequency (the higher the frequency, the better the GPU performance). The core is extremely sensitive to the dual-channel RAM mode (when there are two memory sticks of the same size and frequency) and shows significantly better performance in this mode compared to the single-channel mode. Radeon Vega 7 is a low cost integrated graphics card that will provide comfortable performance in undemanding modern games such as DOTA2, CS:Source, CS:GO, World of Tanks with medium graphics settings and 720p(1280*720) or low graphics settings and resolutions. 1080p(1920*1080). In modern demanding games: The Witcher 3, Red Dead Redemption 2, at 720p(1280*720) resolution and minimum graphics settings, the frame rate will be 35-40, with subsidence in the most difficult scenes up to 20-25. In older games like GTA V and Tomb Raider 2013, Radeon Vega 7 will provide a high comfortable amount of FPS at medium graphics settings.

Additional information:
— To further increase performance in games, turn off the «vertical sync» option in the graphics settings.

Radeon Vega 7 test in games: