Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Fortnite Battle Royale
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 2700X
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
16960 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
2190 Pts
Fortnite Battle Royale
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 7 2700X
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
87.0 FPS |
1080p |
78.0 FPS |
1440p |
56.8 FPS |
1440p |
50. 9 FPS |
2160p |
30.7 FPS |
2160p |
27.6 FPS |
w1440p |
46.8 FPS |
w1440p |
42.0 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
140.1 FPS |
1080p |
127.7 FPS |
1440p |
97.5 FPS |
1440p |
88.8 FPS |
2160p |
57.4 FPS |
2160p |
52.4 FPS |
w1440p |
82.6 FPS |
w1440p |
75.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
193.2 FPS |
1080p |
177.5 FPS |
1440p |
138. 3 FPS |
1440p |
126.7 FPS |
2160p |
84.2 FPS |
2160p |
77.1 FPS |
w1440p |
118.4 FPS |
w1440p |
108.6 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
299.4 FPS |
1080p |
277.0 FPS |
1440p |
219.7 FPS |
1440p |
202.5 FPS |
2160p |
137.6 FPS |
2160p |
126.7 FPS |
w1440p |
190.1 FPS |
w1440p |
175.1 FPS |
Ryzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 7 2700X
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen 2 | Zen |
Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | unknown | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Jul 2019 | Apr 2018 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 6 | 8 |
# of Threads | 12 | 16 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3. 6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 36.0x | 37.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 65 W | 105 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.35 GHz |
Voltage | variable | variable |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | unknown | 192 mm² |
Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
Package | µOPGA-1331 | |
Process Size | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | 4,800 million | 4800 million |
tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700X in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
A Brief Comparison Between Ryzen 7 2700x and Ryzen 5 3600
Both AMD Ryzen 7 2700x and AMD Ryzen 5 3600 come with their perks and features especially when they are used with the best RAM for Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 2700x. . They are competitive and closely similar to one another. Therefore, at times, it becomes hard for one to choose between either one of them. Both desktop CPUs are great and have their individual approaches.
If you want to find out which one amongst the two would be the better choice for you, based on your needs and requirements, continue reading. This article is based on a thorough comparison between the two. The comparison is drawn based on different performance benchmarks and tests to determine the strengths as well as the weaknesses of both of these processors.
Major Differences
As already mentioned, both desktop CPUs share some similarities. However, there are a couple of differences between the AMD Ryzen 7 2700x and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700x has eight cores, desktop processors, 155 GBP while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has six cores desktop processors 175 GBP. Whereas the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a newer release and has a higher turbo boost frequency.
The construction and design of the Ryzen 5 3600 are also better. Therefore, when it is paired with the best GPU for Ryzen 5, 3600, the visual experience is amplified by a significant factor.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher IPC (Instruction per cycle) because of the upgraded architecture of the chip.
Specifications
This detailed comparison table will help you to find the major differences between AMD Ryzen 7 2700x vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
Process Name | Ryzen 7 2700x | Ryzen 5 3600 |
Vendor | AMD | AMD |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Cores | 8 | 6 |
Treads | 16 | 12 |
Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Performance Comparison
Cores
The Ryzen 7 2700x features a total of 8 cores. Whereas the Ryzen 5 3600 has a total of 6 cores. So the Ryzen 7 2700x might be a better choice as more cores mean that the users can efficiently multitask and run several programs at once without encountering any issue.
Threads
With a total of 16 threads, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700x takes the lead. The Ryzen 5 3600 has 12 threads which are quite impressive, but the Ryzen 7 2700x has two extra threads that indeed make it a lot more efficient and amplify its speed.
The games run smoothly on both of these processors, but massive programs and software will do better when used with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700x.
Cache
The L1 and L2 level cache is the same for both of these processors. The L1 cache is 96k per core whereas the L2 cache is 512K per core. The L3 cache of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is better as it is 32MB (shared) whereas for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700x it is 16MB (shared). Both processors support unlocked multiplier, but the L3 cache improvement gives the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 an upper hand.
Memory
If you are someone who is looking for a desktop that has better memory support, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 will be the better choice. It has the DDR4-3200 memory type and comes with a memory size of 128 GB.
It offers a maximum memory bandwidth of 47.68 GB/s. The memory channels for both the desktops are the same. But if you find the best RAM for Ryzen 7 2700x, you can amplify the memory as desired.
Price
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700x is an older processor and is priced at around USD 299. Whereas the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a price tag of approximately USD 199 and is a recent release.
Note: Prices may vary due to time.
Therefore, speaking in terms of an economical choice, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is not only newer, but it is affordable and economical as well. It was released in July 2019 whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 2700x was launched in April 2018. So they are almost a year apart.
Conclusion
Both the AMD Ryzen 7 2700x, as well as the AMD Ryzen 5 3600, are a popular choice amongst customers. However, a detailed comparison between the two makes it evident that Ryzen 5 3600 is better in terms of performance, memory, and price as well.
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/cpu/ryzen-7-2700-protiv-ryzen-5-3600%23gaming
Popular video card comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular video cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular 9 processor comparisons0008
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular processors
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Ryzen 5 3600
74.1 (+10.4%)
Ryzen 7 2700
66.4
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. 9Ryzen 7
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work may be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Ryzen 5 3600 71 (+14. 2%) Ryzen 7 2700 60.9 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Ryzen 5 3600 56.9 (+14.4%) Ryzen 7 2700 48.7 |
Extreme |
Ryzen 5 3600 19.4 Ryzen 7 2700 20.4 (+4.9%) |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1250 (+15.4%)
AMD RYZEN 7 2700
1057
CORETI Core 9000
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
8947
Cinebench R20 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
472 (+14.6%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
403
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
3570 (+3.4%)
AMD RYZEN 7 2700
3448
Cinebench R15 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
197 197
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
,0002,12 Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1578 (+3.1%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
1529
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 9000
944
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
6821 (+8.3%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
6252
Blender 2.
81 BMW27
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
235.7 (+2%)
AMD RYZEN 231
Passmark
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
17863 (+12%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
15716
characteristics
Data is not yet filled, so the tables may not have enough information or existing functions.
Basic
Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | ||
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | ||
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | No data | No data |
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 12-2021 | 11-2020 |
Model Official name. | ||
Cores The number of physical cores. | 6 | 8 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 12 | 16 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 4.15 | No data |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | No data | No data |
Instructions | ||
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | ||
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | ||
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | No data | No data |
Cooling system specifications |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | ||
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | No data | No data |
Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. | No data | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
RAM
Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | No data | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | ||
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | ||
RAM bandwidth | ||
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | No data | No data |
PCI configuration options | ||
Number of PCI lanes | No data |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- On average, gaming performance is 7% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 8%.