Amd 8350 vs i7: Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz vs AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-1255U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-1255U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-8350 on one side and the Intel Core i7-1255U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor		AMD FX-8350				Intel Core i7-1255U
Market (main)		Desktop				Laptop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Piledriver				Golden Cove + Gracemont
Core name		Vishera				Alder Lake-U
Family		FX-8000				Core i7-1200
Part number(s), S-Spec		FD8350FRW8KHK, FD8350FRHKBOX, FX-8350 Black Edition				FJ8071504826802, FJ8071504826803, SRLFQ, SRLFR
Release date		Q4 2012				Q1 2022
Lithography		32 nm SOI				Intel 7
Transistors		1. 200.000.000				—
Cores		8				10
Threads		8				12
Base frequency		4,0 GHz				1,7 GHz
Turbo frequency		4,2 GHz				4,7 GHz
Energy cores		—				8 Cores 8 Threads @ 1,2 / 3,5 GHz
High performance cores		8 Cores 8 Threads @ 4,0 / 4,2 GHz				2 Cores 4 Threads @ 1,7 / 4,7 GHz
Cache memory		8 MB				12 MB
Max memory capacity		32 GB				64 GB
Memory types		DDR3-1866				DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267, LPDDR5-5200
Max # of memory channels		2				2
Max PCIe lanes		16				14
TDP		125 W				15 W
Suggested PSU		650W ATX Power Supply				—
GPU integrated graphics		None				Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake)
GPU execution units		—				96
GPU shading units		—				768
GPU base clock		—				300 MHz
GPU boost clock		—				1250 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point		—				2. 150 GFLOPS
Socket		AM3+				BGA1744
Compatible motherboard		Socket AM3+ Motherboard				—
Maximum temperature		61°C				100°C
Drystone MIPS		97.114 DMIPS				—
AI accelerator		—				Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost
Crypto engine		Advanced Encryption Standard instructions				AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security		Enhanced Virus Protection				OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
Max display resolution		—				4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2304@120Hz (eDP)
CPU-Z single thread		231				653
CPU-Z multi thread		1. 597				4.544
Cinebench R15 single thread		100				229
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		669				1.369
Cinebench R23 single thread		484				1.632
Cinebench R23 multi-thread		3.355				8.292
PassMark single thread		1.573				3.365
PassMark CPU Mark		5.944				13.866
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core		2.738				6.793
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core		10. 978				30.055
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		99,6 GFLOPS				462,1 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		88 pts / W				2.004 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i7-1255U has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-1255U is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-1255U is less. The Intel Core i7-1255U was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-1255U	653 4.544
AMD FX-8350	231 1.597

In single core, the difference is 183%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 185%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-1255U	229 1.369
AMD FX-8350	100 669

In single core, the difference is 129%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 105%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-1255U	1.632 8.292
AMD FX-8350	484 3.355

In single core, the difference is 237%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 147%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-1255U	3.365 13.866
AMD FX-8350	1.573 5.944

In single core, the difference is 114%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 133%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i7-1255U	6.793 30.055
AMD FX-8350	2.738 10.978

In single core, the difference is 148%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 174%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i7-1255U	6. 595 22.397
AMD FX-8350	2.233 5.530

In single core, the difference is 195%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 305%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD FX-8350 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-1255U AMD equivalent

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3930K

Summary

• AMD FX-8350

  100%

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  162%

Relative performance

• AMD FX-8350

  100%

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  152%

Relative performance

• AMD FX-8350

  100%

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  172%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD FX-8350

None

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-3930K

Much higher single threaded performance (around 52% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 72% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

Around 62% higher average synthetic performance.

---

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-3930K

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

---

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-3930K

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features

AMD FX-8350			Intel Core i7-3930K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
SSE4a
AMD64
AMD-V
AES
AVX
CLMUL
CVT16
EVP
FMA4
XOP
Turbo Core
HT3. 1
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
Hyper-Threading
AES-NI

Architecture

	AMD FX-8350		Intel Core i7-3930K
Architecture	AMD Piledriver	vs	Intel_SandyBridge
Market	Desktop	vs	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR3	vs	DDR3
Codename	Vishera	vs	Sandy Bridge-E
Release Date	Oct 2012	vs	Nov 2011

Cores

	AMD FX-8350		Intel Core i7-3930K
Cores	8	vs	6
Threads	8	vs	12
SMPs	1	vs	1
Integrated Graphics	No	vs	No

Cache

	AMD FX-8350		Intel Core i7-3930K
L1 Cache	384 KB	vs	64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache	8192 KB	vs	256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache	8192 KB (shared)	vs	12288 KB (shared)

Physical

	AMD FX-8350		Intel Core i7-3930K
Socket	AMD Socket AM3+	vs	Intel Socket 2011
Max Case Temp	unknown	vs	67°C
Package	uPGA	vs	FC-LGA10
Die Size	315mm²	vs	435mm²
Process	32 nm	vs	32 nm

Performance

	AMD FX-8350		Intel Core i7-3930K
Cpu Frequency	4000 MHz	vs	3200 MHz
Turbo Clock	4200 MHz	vs	3800 MHz
Base Clock	200 MHz	vs	100 MHz
Voltage	1. 45 V	vs	1.35 V
TDP	125 W	vs	130 W

• AMD FX-8350

  2562 points

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  3800 points

Points — higher is better

• AMD FX-8350

  16006 points

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  23040 points

Points — higher is better

• AMD FX-8350

  10913

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  18898

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-8350

  2425

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  3481

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-8350

  12225

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  20305

points — higher is better

• AMD FX-8350

  2121

• Intel Core i7-3930K

  3266

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

	VS
AMD FX-8350		Intel Pentium Gold G6600

	VS
AMD FX-8350		Intel Core i7-1068G7

	VS
Intel Core i7-3930K		AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

	VS
Intel Core i7-3930K		Intel Core i5-11400

	VS
Intel Core i7-11800H		Intel Core i7-11700F

	VS
Intel Core i7-11700F		Intel Core i7-11700

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770: Comparison

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Rating: 6 points

6 points 03

Interfaces and communications

Key features

Top specifications and features

• PassMark CPU score
• Heat dissipation (TDP)
• Number of threads
• CPU base clock
• Technological process

PassMark CPU score

Intel Core i7-3770: 5831
AMD FX-8350: 6092

Thermal Dissipation (TDP)

Intel Core i7-3770: 77 W
AMD FX-8350: 125 W

Number of threads

Intel Core i7-3770: 8
AMD FX-8350: 8

CPU base clock speed

Intel Core i7-3770: 3.4 GHz
AMD FX-8350: 4 GHz

Process technology

Intel Core i7-3770: 22 nm
AMD FX-8350: 32nm

Description

Intel Core i7-3770 runs at 3. 4Hz, second AMD FX-8350 runs at 4Hz. Intel Core i7-3770 capable of overclocking to 3.9Hz and the second up to 4.2 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 77W, while the AMD FX-8350 has 125W.

Regarding the architecture, the Intel Core i7-3770 is built on 22 nm technology. AMD FX-8350 on 32 nm architecture.

Regarding processor memory. Intel Core i7-3770 can support DDR3. The maximum supported volume is 32 MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 25.6. The second processor AMD FX-8350 is capable of supporting DDR3. The bandwidth is 21. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.

Graphics. The Intel Core i7-3770 has an Intel HD Graphics 4000 graphics core. Its frequency is 650 MHz. AMD FX-8350 received a Discrete Graphics Card Required video core. Here the frequency is No data MHz.

How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the Intel Core i7-3770 scored 5831. And the AMD FX-8350 scored 6092.

Why AMD FX-8350 is better than Intel Core i7-3770

• Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 77 W vs 125 W, -38% less
• Process 22 nm vs 32 nm, -31% less
• Max. memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s vs 21 GB/s, 22% more

Comparison of Intel Core i7-3770 and AMD FX-8350: highlights 2 PassMark score CPU

write speed and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all

5831

max 104648

Average: 6033.5

6092

max 104648

Average: 6033.5

Benchmark Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark that measures the multi-threaded performance of a processor.
Show all

2964

max 25920

Average: 5219.2

2620

max 25920

Average: 5219.2

Benchmark Geekbench 5

771

max 2315

Average: 936. 8

540

max 2315

Average: 936.8

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

8479

max 18653

Mean value:

7638

max 18653

Mean value:

AES

Commands designed to speed up encryption and decryption operations using the AES algorithm. They allow processors to process data faster and more efficiently, improving the performance of cryptographic operations. This is especially useful in security systems, network communications and data storage.
Full text

Yes

Yes

Thermal control technologies

Yes

n.a. Execution

Technology that protects the system from malicious software and unauthorized access.
Full text

Yes

No data

Anti-Theft technology

Function to protect against data theft and unauthorized access to the computer.

Yes

N/A

Supports hardware virtualization technology

Hardware virtualization makes it much easier to get high quality images.
Full text

Yes

No data

Number of threads

The more threads, the higher the processor performance, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all

8

max 256

Average: 10.7

8

max 256

Average: 10.7

L1 cache size

A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all

256KB

max 6144

Average: 299.3 KB

384KB

max 6144

Average: 299.3 KB

L2 Cache Size

L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all

1MB

max 512

Average: 4. 5 MB

8MB

max 512

Average: 4.5 MB

L3 cache size

Large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in CPU and system performance tuning
Show all

8MB

max 768

Average: 16.3 MB

8MB

max 768

Average: 16.3 MB

Maximum Turbo Clock Speed ​​

When the processor speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

3.9GHz

max 5.7

Average: 3.2 GHz

4.2GHz

max 5.7

Average: 3.2 GHz

Number of cores

The number of processor cores indicates the number of independent computing units that can execute tasks in parallel. More cores allow the processor to handle more tasks at once, which improves overall performance and the ability to handle multi-threaded applications.
Show all

4

max 72

Mean: 5. 8

8

max 72

Mean: 5.8

Processor base clock speed

3.4GHz

max 4.7

Average: 2.5 GHz

4GHz

max 4.7

Average: 2.5 GHz

Unlocked processor multiplier

Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, thanks to which they work faster and improve the quality in games and other applications.
Full text

No

Yes

Turbo Boost technology

Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to operate at a frequency higher than the maximum. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show in full

2

Mean: 1.9

Mean: 1.9

Die Size

Smaller die size in processors provides better performance and power efficiency.
Show all

160 mm2

max 513

Average value: 160 mm2

315 mm2

max 513

Average value: 160 mm2

Graphic system

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Discrete Graphics Card Required

Max. graphics system frequency

1.15GHz

max 2.1

Average: 1.1 GHz

GHz

max 2.1

Average: 1.1 GHz

Max. number of processors in configuration

1

Mean: 1.3

1

Mean: 1.3

DDR version

Various versions of DDR, such as DDR2, DDR3, DDR4, and DDR5, offer improved features and performance over previous versions, allowing you to work more efficiently with data and improve overall system performance.
Show all

3

Mean: 3.5

3

Mean: 3.5

Max. memory bandwidth

This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

25.6GB/s

max 352

Average: 41.4 GB/s

21GB/s

max 352

Average: 41.4 GB/s

Memory frequency

RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all

1600MHz

max 4800

Average: 2106. 2 MHz

1866 MHz

max 4800

Average: 2106.2 MHz

Max. number of memory channels

The greater their number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor

2

max 16

Mean: 2.9

max 16

Mean: 2.9

Max. memory capacity

Largest RAM memory capacity.

32GB

max 6000

Average: 404.4 GB

GB

max 6000

Average: 404.4 GB

System bus frequency

Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all

5 GT/s

max 1600

Average: 156.1 GT/s

5.4 GT/s

max 1600

Average: 156.1 GT/s

ECC memory support

Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.

N/A

N/A

Intel Flexible Display Interface (Intel FDI)

A technology developed by Intel that allows flexible connection of displays to the graphics controller in the processor. It allows you to transfer video signals and data from the graphics controller to the display using various interfaces such as HDMI, DVI or VGA.
Show all

Yes

N/A

vPro

A set of technologies to improve the security and manageability of business computers.

Yes

N/A

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

Technology in Intel processors that dynamically adjusts clock speed and voltage to optimize power consumption and performance.
Full text

Yes

No data

AES-NI Commands

AES is required to speed up encryption and decryption.

Yes

Yes

Instructions F16C

F16C allows you to speed up tasks such as adjusting volume or adjusting contrast.

Yes

Yes

AVX

AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show all

Yes

Yes

Instructions MMX

MMX is required to speed up tasks such as adjusting volume and adjusting contrast.
Full text

Yes

Yes

Socket

Connector on the motherboard for installing the processor.

FCLGA1155

AM3+

Thermal Monitoring

A function that allows you to monitor and control the temperature of the processor.

Yes

N/A

TSX

A technology for efficiently synchronizing threads of execution through the use of transactional memory.
Full text

N/A

N/A

TXT

Technology for creating a secure and isolated execution environment that protects your system and data from malware and attacks.
Full text

Yes

No data

EDB

Technology used in processors to improve system security. It prevents malicious code from executing by blocking its execution in memory and protecting the computer from attacks such as buffer overflow attacks. EDB helps prevent the introduction and spread of malicious software, providing better data and system protection.
Full text

Yes

No data

Secure Key

A technology that generates high quality random numbers for encryption and other cryptographic operations. It enhances system security by providing strong data encryption and protection against hacking or unauthorized access.
Full text

Yes

No data

Identity Protection

A suite of technologies to protect personal information and identity from unauthorized access and fraud.
Show all

Yes

N/A

EPT

Memory virtualization technology used in Intel processors. It provides the ability to efficiently manage and access virtual memory. EPT allows virtual machines to access physical memory directly, minimizing the latency and overhead of translating virtual addresses into physical ones. In this way, EPT improves the performance and efficiency of virtualization, simplifies memory management, and provides better isolation between virtual machines.
Show all

Yes

N/A

Quick Sync Video

Hardware technology developed by Intel that provides fast and efficient video processing. It allows you to quickly encode and decode video with minimal CPU usage, reducing system load and providing smoother and more efficient video playback.
Full text

Yes

No data

Clear Video HD

Clear Video HD is an Intel technology that improves the quality of video playback on computers. It includes video processing algorithms, improves sharpness and color reproduction, provides smooth playback and hardware support for video decoding of various formats.
Full text

Yes

N/A

InTru 3D

A technology in Intel processors that enables three-dimensional (3D) content to be played on a computer.
Show all

Yes

N/A

Supports multi-threading

The ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously to improve performance.
Full text

Yes

No data

Process technology

The small size of semiconductors means that this is a new generation chip.

22 nm

Average: 36.8 nm

32 nm

Average: 36.8 nm

Number of transistors

The higher the number, the more powerful the processor is

1200 million

max 57000

Average: 1517.3 million

1200 million

max 57000

Average: 1517.3 million

Heat dissipation (TDP)

Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

77W

Average: 67.6 W

125W

Average: 67.6 W

PCI Express Edition

High-speed bus for connecting peripherals to the computer. Different versions determine the data transfer rate, and the number (x1, x4, x8, x16) indicates the number of logical lines for data transfer and determines the throughput and capabilities of the devices.
Show all

3

Mean: 2.9

Mean: 2.9

Embedded options available

Yes

No data

Cooling system specifications

2011D

9001 0 n/a

Die size

Smaller die size in processors provides better performance and power efficiency .
Show all

160 mm2

max 513

Average value: 160 mm2

315 mm2

max 513

Average value: 160 mm2

GPU base clock

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

650MHz

max 2400

Average: 535.8 MHz

MHz

max 2400

Average: 535.8 MHz

Supports 64-bit system

A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM, unlike a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Full text

Yes

N/A

Maximum processor temperature

If the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded, a reset may occur.
Show all

105°C

max 110

Average value: 96 °C

61°C

max 110

Average value: 96 °C

Monitor support

Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all

3

Mean: 2.9

Mean: 2.9

Code name

Ivy Bridge

Vishera

Maximum Tcase Temperature

Maximum Processor Case Temperature

67. 4°C

max 105

Average: 75.1 °C

°C

max 105

Average: 75.1 °C

Purpose

Desktop

Boxed Processor

FAQ

Can Intel Core i7-3770 and AMD FX-8350 work in 4K mode?

Intel Core i7-3770 — Not available. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

How many PCIe lanes

Intel Core i7-3770 — Not available. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

How much RAM is supported?

Intel Core i7-3770 supports 32 GB. AMD FX-8350 supports N/AGB.

How fast are the processors?

Intel Core i7-3770 runs at 3.4 GHz.

How many cores does the processor have?

Intel Core i7-3770 has 4 cores. AMD FX-8350 has 8 cores.

Do processors support ECC memory?

Intel Core i7-3770 — no. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

Does the Intel Core i7-3770 have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i7-3770 — Intel HD Graphics 4000. AMD FX-8350 — Discrete Graphics Card Required

What kind of RAM does the

Intel Core i7-3770 support DDR3. AMD FX-8350 supports DDR3.

What is the socket of the processors?

FCLGA1155 is used to install the Intel Core i7-3770. AMD FX-8350 is installed using AM3+.

What architecture is used?

The Intel Core i7-3770 is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. AMD FX-8350 is based on the Vishera architecture.

Is the multiplier unlocked on the Intel Core i7-3770 processor?

Intel Core i7-3770 — no. AMD FX-8350 — has.

How do processors perform in benchmarks?

According to PassMark, the Intel Core i7-3770 scored 5831 points. AMD FX-8350 scored 6092 points.

What is the maximum frequency of the processors?

The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i7-3770 reaches 3.9 Hz. The maximum frequency of the AMD FX-8350 reaches 4.2 Hz.

How much energy do they consume?

The power consumption of the Intel Core i7-3770 can be up to 77 watts. AMD FX-8350 has up to 77 watts.

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-4790K

VS

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i7-3930K

VS

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i5-2500K

VS

Intel Core i5-8600K

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i7-4930K

VS

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i7-4578U

VS

Intel Core i7-8700?

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i3-6100

VS

Intel Core i7-2600

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 1500X

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i3-2100

VS

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-8600K

VS

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i7-1065G7

VS

Intel Core i7-8565U

Intel Core i7-3770

VS

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i5-4690K

VS

Intel Core i7-3820

AMD A12-9720P

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Intel Core i5-4570

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

VS

Intel Core i5-8400T

Intel Core i5-6600

VS

Intel Core i5-7500

Comparison of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-870

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-870 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-8350

versus

Intel Core i7-870

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8350

• Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 1 month(s)
• Processor unlocked, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclock
• 4 more cores, the ability to run more applications at the same time: 8 vs 4
• About 17% more clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
• L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

8 times more means more data can be stored in it for quick access

• Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark about 14% more: 1580 vs 1392
• Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 94% more: 6033 vs 3112
• About 3% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 566 vs 547
• About 35% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2751 vs 2032

9004 1 Productivity in 9. 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 9.886 vs 1.029

• About 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 0.424 vs 0.342
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 55% better performance: 7.137 vs 4.602

Issue date	23 October 2012 vs September 2009
Unlocked	Unlocked / Locked
Number of cores	8 vs 4
Maximum frequency	4.2 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
Process	32nm SOI vs 45nm
Level 1 cache	384 KB vs 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	8 MB vs 256 KB (per core)
PassMark — Single thread mark	1580 vs 1392
PassMark — CPU mark	6033 vs 3112
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	566 vs 547
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	2751 vs 2032
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.886 vs 1.029
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.424 vs 0.342
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	7.137 vs 4.602

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-870

• About 19% more max core temperature: 72.7°C vs 61°C
• About 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt

9004 1 Performance in 3DMark benchmark About 83% more Fire Strike — Physics Score: 2453 vs 1337

• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2.4x more performance: 53.478 vs 21.912
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 29% better performance: 1.541 vs 1.199

Maximum core temperature	72. 7°C vs 61°C
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt vs 125 Watt
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	2453 vs 1337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	53.478 vs 21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	1.541 vs 1.199

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-870

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	21.912 53.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD FX-8350	Intel Core i7-870
PassMark — Single thread mark	1580	1392
PassMark — CPU mark	6033	3112
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	566	547
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	2751	2032
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	1337	2453
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.886	1.029
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	21.912	53.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.424	0.342
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	1.199	1.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	7.137	4.602

Performance comparison

configuration

	AMD FX-8350	Intel Core i7-870
Architecture name	Vishera	Lynnfield
Family	AMD FX-Series Processors
Issue date	October 23, 2012	September 2009
OPN PIB	FD8350FRHKBOX
OPN Tray	FD8350FRW8KHK
Place in the rating	2253	2458
Price now	$79. 99	$98.99
Series	AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	32.95	15.90
Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
Price at first issue date		$197
Processor Number		i7-870
Status		Discontinued
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	4 GHz	2. 93 GHz
Crystal area	315 ​​mm	296 mm2
Level 1 cache	384KB	64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	8MB	256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	8MB	8192 KB (shared)
Process	32nm SOI	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	61°C	72.7°C
Maximum frequency	4. 2 GHz	3.60 GHz
Number of cores	8	4
Number of threads	8	8
Voltage P0 Vcore	Min: 1.2V — Max: 1.4V
Number of transistors	1200 Million	774 million
Unlocked
Bus Speed ​​		2.5 GT/s DMI
Permissible core voltage		0. 6500V-1.4000V
Supported memory frequency	1866 MHz
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3 1066/1333
Maximum number of memory channels		2
Maximum memory bandwidth		21 GB/s
Maximum memory size		16GB
Maximum number of processors in	1	1
Supported sockets	AM3+	LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	95 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size		37. 5mm x 37.5mm
PCI Express revision	n/a	2.0
Number of PCI Express lanes		16
PCIe configurations		1×16, 2×8
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions		Intel® SSE4.