AMD A10-7850K vs AMD FX-6300: What is the difference?
46points
AMD A10-7850K
40points
AMD FX-6300
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD A10-7850K
AMD FX-6300
Why is AMD A10-7850K better than AMD FX-6300?
- 267MHz higher ram speed?
2133MHzvs1866MHz - 4nm smaller semiconductor size?
28nmvs32nm - 37.6% higher PassMark result?
5676vs4125 - Has integrated graphics?
- 6.83% higher PassMark result (single)?
1580vs1479 - 1210million more transistors?
2410 millionvs1200 million
Why is AMD FX-6300 better than AMD A10-7850K?
- 41.89% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.5GHzvs4 x 3.7GHz - 2 more CPU threads?
6vs4 - 2MB bigger L2 cache?
6MBvs4MB - 32KB bigger L1 cache?
288KBvs256KB - 21.
47% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
7536vs6204
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD A10-7850K
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD A10-7850K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD A10-7850K
vs
AMD Pro A10-8750B
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD A10-7850K
vs
AMD Athlon X4 950
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD A10-7850K
vs
AMD A10-7890K
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD A10-7850K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD A10-7850K
vs
Intel Core i5-4670K
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-4430
AMD A10-7850K
vs
AMD A10-5800K
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD A10-7850K
vs
AMD A8-7600
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-3330
AMD A10-7850K
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD A10-7850K
1 User reviews
AMD A10-7850K
10.
0/10
1 User reviews
AMD FX-6300
2 User reviews
AMD FX-6300
9.5/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
9.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
8.0/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
1 votes
7.5/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
4 x 3.7GHz
6 x 3.5GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.1GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
1.33MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2133MHz
1866MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-6300
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device.
For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-6300
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads.
This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(AMD FX-6300)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-6300
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD FX-6300)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD A10-7850K vs. AMD FX-8350
AMD A10-7850K
The AMD A10-7850K operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads.
It run at 4.00 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the FM2+ CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-2133 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Kaveri (Steamroller) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q1/2014
AMD FX-8350
The AMD FX-8350 operates with 8 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2012
AMD A10-7850K
AMD FX-8350
Compare Detail
3. 70 GHz |
Frequency | 4.00 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.20 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.10 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon R7 — 512 (Kaveri) |
GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 28 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| DDR3-2133 | Memory | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
4. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | |
| 28 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| FM2+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q1/2014 | Release date | Q4/2012 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.
5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.
The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| AMD A10-7850K | AMD FX-8350 | |
| 95 W | Max TDP | 125 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
AMD A10-7850K vs AMD FX-6300
Análisis comparativo de los procesadores AMD A10-7850K y AMD FX-6300 para todas las características en las siguientes categorías: Esenciales, Desempeño, Memoria, Gráficos, Interfaces gráficas, Soporte de APIs gráficas, Compatibilidad, Periféricos, Tecnologías avanzadas, Virtualización.
Análisis de desempeño comparativo de procesadores: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD A10-7850K
Comprar en Amazon
vs
AMD FX-6300
Comprar en Amazon
Diferencias
Razones para considerar el AMD A10-7850K
- El CPU es más nuevo: fue lanzado al mercado 1 año(s) 3 mes(es) después
- El procesador está desbloqueado, un multiplicador desbloqueado permite un overclocking más fácil
- Una velocidad de reloj alrededor de 5% más alta: 4 GHz vs 3.
8 GHz - Una temperatura de núcleo máxima 3% mayor: 72.40°C vs 70.50°C
- Un proceso de manufactura más nuevo permite que un procesador sea más poderoso y trabaje a menor temperatura: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Alrededor de 1% mejor desempeño en PassMark — Single thread mark: 1509 vs 1489
- Alrededor de 5% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.998 vs 16.195
- Alrededor de 7% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.104 vs 4.767
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 14 January 2014 vs October 2012 |
| Desbloqueado | Desbloqueado vs Bloqueado |
| Frecuencia máxima | 4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
| Temperatura máxima del núcleo | 72. 40°C vs 70.50°C |
| Tecnología de proceso de manufactura | 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1509 vs 1489 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.998 vs 16.195 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.104 vs 4.767 |
Razones para considerar el AMD FX-6300
- 2 más núcleos, ejecuta más aplicaciones a la vez: 6 vs 4
- 2 más subprocesos: 6 vs 4
- Alrededor de 13% más caché L1; más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L1 para un acceso más rápido luego
- Alrededor de 50% más caché L2; más datos pueden ser almacenados en el caché L2 para un acceso más rápido luego
- Alrededor de 24% mejor desempeño en PassMark — CPU mark: 4179 vs 3367
- Alrededor de 2% mejor desempeño en Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 527 vs 516
- Alrededor de 21% mejor desempeño en Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1914 vs 1576
- Alrededor de 33% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.905 vs 5.183 - Alrededor de 7% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.339 vs 0.316
- Alrededor de 6% mejor desempeño en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.85 vs 0.799
| Número de núcleos | 6 vs 4 |
| Número de subprocesos | 6 vs 4 |
| Caché L1 | 288 KB vs 256 KB |
| Caché L2 | 6 MB vs 4 MB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4179 vs 3367 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 527 vs 516 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1914 vs 1576 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.905 vs 5.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.339 vs 0.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.85 vs 0.799 |
Comparar referencias
CPU 1: AMD A10-7850K
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nombre | AMD A10-7850K | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1509 | 1489 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3367 | 4179 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 516 | 527 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1576 | 1914 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | 2098 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
5.183 | 6.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.998 | 16.195 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.316 | 0.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.799 | 0.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.104 | 4.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1781 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 5920 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1781 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 5920 |
Comparar especificaciones
| AMD A10-7850K | AMD FX-6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Nombre clave de la arquitectura | Kaveri | Vishera |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 14 January 2014 | October 2012 |
| Precio de lanzamiento (MSRP) | $173 | |
| OPN PIB | AD785KXBJABOX | FD6300WMHKBOX |
| OPN Tray | AD785KXBI44JA | FD6300WMW6KHK |
| Lugar en calificación por desempeño | 1296 | 1982 |
| Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors |
| Segmento vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Precio ahora | $58. 99 |
|
| Valor/costo (0-100) | 31.81 | |
| Soporte de 64 bits | ||
| Base frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| Troquel | 245 mm | 315 mm |
| Caché L1 | 256 KB | 288 KB |
| Caché L2 | 4 MB | 6 MB |
| Tecnología de proceso de manufactura | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Temperatura máxima de la carcasa (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Temperatura máxima del núcleo | 72. 40°C |
70.50°C |
| Frecuencia máxima | 4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Número de núcleos | 4 | 6 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Número de subprocesos | 4 | 6 |
| Número de transistores | 2410 Million | 1200 million |
| Desbloqueado | ||
| Caché L3 | 8 MB | |
| Voltaje Vcore P0 | Min: 1. 15 V — Max: 1.3875 V |
|
| Canales máximos de memoria | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Tipos de memorias soportadas | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Enduro | ||
| Frecuencia gráfica máxima | 720 MHz | |
| Número de núcleos iGPU | 512 | |
| Número de pipelines | 512 | |
| Procesador gráfico | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
| Gráficos intercambiables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Número máximo de CPUs en la configuración | 1 | 1 |
| Zócalos soportados | FM2+ | AM3+ |
| Diseño energético térmico (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Clasificación PCI Express | 3. 0 |
3.0 |
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2. 0 |
AMD A10-7850K vs AMD FX-6300: What is the difference?
Smartphone-graphic wire headphones
46 ballla
AMD A10-7850K
40 BALLLA
AMD FX-6300
VS
64 AMD A10-7850K
AMD FX-6300 9000 AMD FXD FX-6300
Is 7850K better than AMD FX-6300?
- 267MHz higher RAM speed?
2133MHz vs 1866MHz - Is 4nm semiconductor smaller?
28nm vs 32nm - 37.6% higher PassMark score?
5676 vs 4125 - Has integrated graphics?
- 6.83% higher PassMark score (single)?
1580 vs 1479 - 1210million more transistors?
2410M vs 1200M
Why is AMD FX-6300 better than AMD A10-7850K?
- 41.
89% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.5GHz vs 4 x 3.7GHz - 2 more CPU threads?
6 vs 4 - 2MB more L2 cache?
6MB vs 4MB - 32KB more L1 cache?
288KB vs 256KB - 21.47% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
7536 vs 6204
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD A10-7850K
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD A10-7850K
VS
Intel Core i7-4770k
AMD FX-6300 9000 9000 AMD FX-6300
AMD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FXD FX Intel Core i5-7400
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Pro A10-8750B
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD A10-7850K
VS 9000 VS AML AMD AM X4 950
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD A10-7850K
VS
A10-7890K
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
AMD A10-78503
AMD AMD AMD AD AMD RYZEN 5 1600X
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD FX-8350
AMD A10-7850K
VS
Intel Core i5-4670K
AMD FX-6300
VS
VS
VS 4430
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD A10-5800K
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD A10-7850K
VS
A8-7600
9000 9000 AMD FX-6300 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 VS 9000
Intel Core i5-330
AMD A10-7850K
1 Reviews of users
AMD A10-7850K
10.
0 /10
1 Reviews of users
AMD FX-6300
Reviews of users
AMD FX-6300
9023 /10
2 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
10.0236 /10
1 Votes
/10
2 Votes
Games
10.0 /10
1 votes
8.0 /10
2 Votes
performance
10.0 /10
1 Votes
8.5 /10 9000.000 2 Votes
10.0 /10
1 votes
8.5 /10
2 Votes
Energy Equality
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
9000 9000 7.5 7.5 9 /10
2 votes
Performance
1. CPU speed
4 x 3.7GHz
6 x 3.5GHz
). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.1GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9. L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
1.33MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2133MHz
1866MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.max memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory debug code
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-6300
Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.power per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multi-threading
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-6300
Multi-threading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance at the expense of each physical core) processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-6300
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.With TrustZone
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-6300
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming with digital rights management (DRM) technology .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Comparison of AMD A10-5700 and AMD FX-6300
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-5700 and AMD FX-6300 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Peripherals, Technologies.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
AMD A10-5700
versus
AMD FX-6300
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD A10-5700
- Approx. 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 17.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.704 vs 0.85 - 14.7 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.896 vs 4.767
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 288 KB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.704 vs 0.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.896 vs 4.767 |
Reasons to choose AMD FX-6300
- 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 6 vs 4
- About 12% more clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- L2 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 3% higher: 1489 vs 1443
- Performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark is about 52 % more: 4179 vs 2747
- About 10% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 527 vs 477
- About 51% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 1914 vs 1266
- About 62% more performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.905 vs 4.26 - About 87% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) : 16.195 vs 8.674
- Approximately 78% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.339 vs 0.19
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8GHz vs 3.4GHz |
| Level 2 cache | 6 MB vs 1024 KB (per core) |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1489 vs 1443 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4179 vs 2747 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 527 vs 477 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1914 vs 1266 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.905 vs 4.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.195 vs 8.674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.339 vs 0.19 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD A10-5700
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-5700 | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1443 | 1489 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2747 | 4179 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 477 | 527 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1266 | 1914 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
4.26 | 6.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.674 | 16.195 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.19 | 0.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.704 | 0.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.896 | 4.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 916 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1879 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1879 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2098 |
Feature comparison
| AMD A10-5700 | AMD FX-6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Trinity | Vishera |
| Issue date | October 2012 | October 2012 |
| Place in the ranking | 1283 | 1982 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | FD6300WMHKBOX | |
| OPN Tray | FD6300WMW6KHK | |
| Price now | $58. 99 |
|
| Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 31.81 | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Crystal area | 246 mm | 315 mm |
| Level 1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 288KB |
| Level 2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 6MB |
| Process | 32nm | 32nm SOI |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 4 GHz |
3.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of transistors | 1178 million | 1200 million |
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | |
| Level 3 cache | 8MB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 70.50°C | |
| Number of threads | 6 | |
| Voltage P0 Vcore | Min: 1. 15V — Max: 1.3875V |
|
| Unlocked | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866MHz | |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FM2 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| PCI Express revision | 3. 0 |
|
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
AMD A10-7850K vs. AMD Ryzen 3 1200 [12nm]
AMD A10-7850K
AMD A10-7850K runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 4.00 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W . socket FM2+ CPU This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-2133 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction keeps below — degrees C.
In particular, the Kaveri (Steamroller) architecture is advanced over 28 nm and supports AMD-V. The product was launched Q1/2014
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 [12nm]
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 [12nm] runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.40 GHz base 3.10 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU plugs into socket CPU AM4 This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction is kept below 95°C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) architecture is advanced beyond 12 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q2/2020
A10-7850K
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 [12nm]
Compare details
| 3.70 GHZ | Frequency | 3.10 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4.00GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 3.40 GHz |
| 4.00GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 3. 10 GHz |
| no | Hyper Threading | No. |
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon R7-512 (Kaveri) |
GPU | no iGPU |
| no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 28nm | Technology | 12nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| DDR3-2133 | memory size | DDR4-2666 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 4.00MB | L3 Cache | 8. 00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| 28nm | Technology | 12nm |
| FM2+ | Connector | AM4 |
| 95 W | TDP | 65W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q1/2014 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
|
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.