AMD A10-9700 vs AMD FX-6300
Summary
-
AMD A10-9700
100%
-
AMD FX-6300
131%
Relative performance
-
AMD A10-9700
100%
-
AMD FX-6300
120%
Relative performance
-
AMD A10-9700
100%
-
AMD FX-6300
141%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD A10-9700 |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-6300. |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-6300 |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 20% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 41% higher). |
| Around 31% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD FX-6300
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD FX-6300
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 1 |
||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| SSE4a | ||||
| AES | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| CVT16 | ||||
| EVP | ||||
| FMA4 | ||||
| XOP | ||||
| Turbo Core | ||||
| HT3.1 | ||||
Architecture
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Excavator | vs | AMD Piledriver | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Bristol Ridge | vs | Vishera | |
| Release Date | Sep 2016 | vs | Oct 2012 |
Cores
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | vs | 6 | |
| Threads | 4 | vs | 6 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 | vs | No |
Cache
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 288 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 6144 KB | |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | uPGA | |
| Die Size | unknown | vs | 315mm² | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3500 MHz | vs | 3500 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 3800 MHz | vs | 4100 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | 1. 4 V |
|
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 95 W |
-
AMD A10-9700
2622 points
-
AMD FX-6300
2501 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-9700
8404 points
-
AMD FX-6300
10504 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-9700 (simulated)
80.52
-
AMD FX-6300 (simulated)
97.26
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
| VS | ||
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
| VS | ||
| AMD A10-9700 | Intel Core i5-10210Y |
| VS | ||
| AMD FX-6300 | AMD Athlon Silver 3050GE |
| VS | ||
| AMD FX-6300 | AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE |
| VS | ||
| AMD Athlon 3000G | Intel Core i5-10210U |
| VS | ||
| Intel Core i5-10210U | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD A10-7850K vs AMD FX-8320 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A10-7850K vs AMD FX-8320
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A10-7850K on one side and the AMD FX-8320 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD A10-7850K | AMD FX-8320 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Steamroller | Piledriver | ||||||
| Core name | Kaveri | Vishera | ||||||
| Family | A10-7000 | FX-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AD785KXBJABOX, |
FD8320FRW8KHK, |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2014 | Q4 2012 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI | ||||||
| Transistors | 2. 410.000.000 |
1.200.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,0 GHz | 4,0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-2133 |
DDR3-1866 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 29,9 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 95 W | 125 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 650W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 512 Cores (Kaveri) | None | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | — | ||||||
| GPU clock | 720 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 737,3 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
| Socket | FM2+ | AM3+ | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket FM2+ Motherboard | Socket AM3+ Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 72. 4°C |
61.1°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 256 | 243 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 878 | 1.702 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 91 | 82 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 325 | 549 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 294 | 188 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 670 | 1.099 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.511 | 1.454 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3. 424 |
5.355 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.495 | 2.621 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
6.488 | 10.925 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
542 | 559 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
1.687 | 2.818 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
56,52 GFLOPS | 105,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
68 pts / W | 87 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD FX-8320 has a larger number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the PDT of AMD A10-7850K is lower. The AMD A10-7850K was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
243 1.702 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
256 878 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 94%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
82 549 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
91 325 |
In single core, the difference is 11%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 69%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
188 1.099 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
294 670 |
In single core, the difference is 56%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 64%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
1.454 5.355 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
1.511 3.424 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 56%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
2.621 10.925 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
2.495 6.488 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 68%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
2.  84911.033 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
2.406 4.738 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 133%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
2.448 9.539 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
2.336 6.075 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
559 2.818 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
542 1.687 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 67%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
643 3.303 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
667 1.739 |
In single core, the difference is 4%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 90%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-8320 |
561 2.518 |
| AMD A10-7850K |
564 1.472 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 71%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems./i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_08fbf48bc0524877943fe86e43087e7a/internal_photos/bs/2021/h/t/e6RCLITLGM6BzRMNtdBQ/2016-01-28-amd-fx-6.png)
Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD A10-7850K Intel equivalentAMD FX-8320 Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD FX-8320E
AMD A10-7850K vs AMD FX-8350: What is the difference?
47 Ballla
AMD A10-7850K
47 BALLLA
AMD FX-8350
VS
66 Facts compared to
AMD A10-7850K
AMD FX-8350 9000 9000
Why AMD A10-7850K -8350?
- 267MHz higher RAM speed?
2133MHz vs 1866MHz - 11.4°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
72.4°C vs 61°C - Smaller 4nm semiconductors?
28nm vs 32nm - 30W below TDP?
95W vs 125W - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 1 Is the PCI Express (PCIe) version newer?
3 vs 2 - 1210million more transistors?
2410 million vs 1200 million - 1 newer version of Turbo Core?
3 vs 2
Why is AMD FX-8350 better than AMD A10-7850K?
- 2.
16x higher CPU speed?
8 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3.7GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - 4MB more L2 cache?
8MB vs 4MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 256KB - 1.72x higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
2748 vs 1596 - 8.22% higher single core Geekbench 5 result?
566 vs 523 - 5.45% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
6542 vs 6204 - 5.2 higher performance per watt?
22.0 vs 16.8
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD A10-7850K
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD A10-7850K
VS
Intel Core i7-4770k
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD A10-7850
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-8350
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD A10-7890K
AMD FX-8350 9000) i7-4770K
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD A10-7860K
AMD FX-8350
VS
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD A10-7850K
A8-7600
AMD FX-8350 9
AMD RYZEN 5 5600G
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Athlon X4 950
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 5600X
AMD A10-7850K
VS 9000 AMD AMD AMD ATH
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD FX-9590
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 1600x
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
9000) AMD RYZEN 7 1700X
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 3200G
Comers0003
10.
0 /10
1 reviews of users
AMD FX-8350
5 Reviews of users
AMD FX-8350
9.8 /10
5 Reviews Users
Functions
4
10.0 /10
1 votes
/10
5 Votes
Games
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
/10
5 VOTES
performance
10.0 /10
1 Votes
9.2 /10
5 Votes
Reliability
/10 9000
9000.626 /10
5 Votes
Energy Efficiency
10.0 /10
1 Votes
8.6 /10
5 Votes
Production
Central Processor
4 x 3.7GHz
8 x 4GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-8350
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
720MHz
∅
N/A
Graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
∅
N/A
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Execution Units
∅
N/A
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
∅
N/A
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
∅
N/A
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
N/A
The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
∅
N/A
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric location of the 3D scene.
More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs
∅
N/A
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2133MHz
1866MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory debug code
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-8350
Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-8350
logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-8350
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-8350
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.
Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-8350
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD FX-8350
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD FX-8350
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown.