Amd a6 vs intel i3 which is better: Error 403 (Forbidden)

versus

AMD A6-9225

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-7020U

• Approximately 11% more maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C its newer manufacturing process allows more19 new manufacturing process19 make it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 12% higher: 1325 vs 1181
• About 90% better performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark: 2562 vs 1345
• 2. 2 times better performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1659 vs 754
• Performance in GFXBench 4 benchmark. — Manhattan (Frames) is 2.1 times bigger: 3268 vs 1522
• GFXBench 4.0 benchmark performance — T-Rex (Frames) is about 33% bigger: 5594 vs 4199
• GFXBench 4.0 performance — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2.2 times more: 1659vs 754
• About 33% more GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) performance: 5594 vs 4199

Maximum core temperature	100°C vs 90°C
Process	14 nm vs 28 nm
PassMark — Single thread mark	1325 vs 1181
PassMark — CPU mark	2562 vs 1345
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1659 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3268 vs 1522
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	5594 vs 4199
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1659 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3268 vs 1522
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	5594 vs 4199

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core i3-7020U
CPU 2: AMD A6-9225

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	Intel Core i3-7020U	AMD A6-9225
PassMark — Single thread mark	1325	1181
PassMark — CPU mark	2562	1345
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	555
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1252
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1659	754
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3268	1522
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	5594	4199
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1659	754
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3268	1522
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	5594	4199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		1. 391

Performance comparison

	Intel Core i3-7020U	AMD A6-9225
Architecture name	Kaby Lake
Issue date	Q2’18	Q2 2018
Place in the ranking	708	1221
Processor Number	i3-7020U
Series	7th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors	AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops
Status	Launched
Applicability	Mobile	Laptop
Family		AMD A-Series Processors
OPN Tray		AM9225AYN23AC
OS Support		Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	2. 30 GHz	3.1 GHz
Bus Speed ​​	4 GT/s OPI
Process	14nm	28nm
Maximum core temperature	100°C	90°C
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	4
Compute Cores		5
Level 2 cache		1MB
Maximum frequency		2. 6 GHz
Number of GPU cores		3
Unlocked
Maximum number of memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.1 GB/s
Maximum memory size	32GB
Supported memory types	DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600
Supported memory frequency		2133MHz
Device ID	0x5916
Graphics base frequency	300MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1. 00 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® Clear Video Technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Video memory size	32GB
Integrated graphics	Intel® HD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Enduro
Maximum GPU clock		686MHz
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
DisplayPort
DVI
eDP
HDMI
Maximum number of monitors supported	3
4K support
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via eDP	[email protected]
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4	[email protected]
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5
Vulkan
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in configuration	1
Package Size	42mm X 24mm
Supported sockets	FCBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Configurable TDP		10-15 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes	12
PCI Express revision	3. 0	3.0
PCIe configurations	1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® My WiFi Technology
Intel® Smart Response Technology
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Speed ​​Shift technology
Thermal Monitoring
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS)
AMD App Acceleration
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

specifications, comparison with competitors and reviews

In June 2011, AMD launched the first line of Llano-based A-series APUs (accelerated processing units) that combined the K10 architecture with the Radeon GPU in one chip. But, unfortunately for those who would like to take advantage of the new product, its first launch with components codenamed Husky was aimed at laptop manufacturers and PC manufacturers. Thus, anyone wishing to build their own personal computer based on Llano had to wait in line to gain access to the new AMD processors. With the official launch of desktop versions of Llano’s A-series APUs, codenamed Lynx, that wait is over.

AMD A8-3850 Architecture Overview

Like AMD’s low-power, accelerated Brazos-based E-series processors released in February 2011, the Lynx architecture marked a shift in the manufacturer’s strategic direction towards a more integrated approach. The company said the A-series is the first line of processors to offer an integrated graphics chip alongside a 4-core CPU in the hope that the market will put up with the low-performance hybrid chips found in offices and budget PCs. AMD started this revolution with the release of 4 APUs belonging to the A8 and A6 series. They differed both in clock speed and integrated graphics processing devices. The A8 core pair has 400 stream processors in the Radeon HD 6550D graphics chip, while the A6 has 320 in the HD 6530D. At the same time, the first APU works faster than the second, since it has a higher core frequency, equal to 600 MHz versus 443.

The line is further subdivided into models with different clock speeds. The two 4-core accelerated A8 and A6 series high-end processors, the AMD A8-3850 and A6-3650 APUs, use clock speeds of 2.9 and 2.6 GHz respectively (although these numbers are reduced in idle state thanks to Cool’n’Quiet ), and have a rather impressive power consumption of 100 watts.

The two junior members of the line, A6-3600 and A8-3800, also support Turbo Core technology. This means that their performance dynamically changes depending on the requirements placed on them. A8-3800 uses 2.4 GHz clock speed, boosting it to 2.9GHz with Turbo Core on, and the A6-3600 at 2. 1 GHz, bringing them up to 2.4. Both of these hybrid processor devices consume much less power — only 65 watts.

The cores that provide this floating frequency are based on the rather pretentiously named Stars design. In reality, it’s just an improved 32nm version of the 45nm Phenom II. This means that the CPU in the AMD chip is still based on the outdated K10 architecture, which has not competed well with the Intel Core in the past. However, the accelerated Lynx processor offers a different feature than competing Intel chips. This is the speed of interaction with RAM. Each of the A-series models supports DDR3 running at up to 1866MHz rather than the 1333MHz required by low-end Intel chips. Because this memory is shared between the CPU and GPU, it can provide a slight boost to graphics performance by using faster RAM.

The Llano architecture also includes a dedicated unified UVD video decoder, which allows video playback without support for DirectX video acceleration to offload the CPU and GPU.

In addition to the release of the A8 and A6, AMD is offering a pair of motherboard chipsets called the A55 and A75. Each supports RAID and hard drives larger than 2.2TB, but the premium A75 chipset also allows for 4 USB 3 ports and 6 SATA connectors running at 6Gb/s.

In the graphics part of the APU, 400 stream processors operate at a frequency of 600 MHz and are divided into 5 SIMD units with a common register and a tessellation unit, as well as 20 texture processing units and 8 ROPs.

Architectural Features

AMD A8-3850 high-end $135 processor directly competes with the 2-core i3-2100. The chip includes 4 Star cores that run at 2.9GHz. They are made using 32nm technology, which provides a 6% increase in usable die area compared to the 45nm process of the previous generation Athlon II. Each core is allocated 128 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2. APU does not have a third, larger level.

A 905-pin FM1 AMD A8-3850 connector was specially created for the A series, since it became necessary to output video from the processor to the DVI, VGA and HDMI connectors of the motherboard. Of course, there is no question of any backward compatibility of previous AMD CPU models. Despite the socket change, the heat dissipation specifications have not changed. All existing coolers should still be compatible as they match the chip’s thermal design rating.

Also below the integrated heat spreader is a Radeon HD 6550D graphics processor running at 600 MHz. This looks rather weak compared to the 850 MHz used by HD Graphics 2000 in the i3-2100. However, the AMD GPU has a whopping 400 stream processors and 20 texture units compared to Intel’s 6 small execution units. The A8-3850 also outperforms the i3-2100 in terms of features, as the former provides full support for DirectX 11, while the latter is only compatible with DirectX 10.

Features The AMD A8-3850 APU is supported by a number of unique features, including Dual Graphics technology. Similar to CrossFire technology, it allows the integrated GPU to be paired with other compatible discrete graphics cards from the manufacturer to provide additional power. This feature is enabled in the ASRock BIOS by default, so just insert your graphics card and the motherboard with AMD A8-3850 drivers will do the rest. There are also some restrictions. The technology works in games that support DirectX 11 and 10. With DX9Dual Graphics is functional, but in this case the performance is not optimal. With the Llano architecture, the manufacturer also demonstrated for the first time asynchronous multi-processor rendering, which allows different workloads to be distributed between the CPU and GPU. Compatible only with low-end AMD GPUs, including HD 6670 1GB, HD 6570 1GB, HD 6450 512MB, and HD 6350 512MB.

Overclocking AMD A8-3850

As you can see, the Lynx architecture is not aimed at high performance enthusiasts. As a result, the overclocking capabilities of the AMD A8-3850 processor are also limited. For example, users were delighted to learn that the design of Intel’s built-in oscillator was copied. This means that all clock frequencies throughout the board are connected to each other. As you can see in Sandy Bridge systems, this setting essentially makes it impossible to overclock through the base frequencies (or reference, if we talk about Llano APUs), since their increase by more than 5% can lead to instability in the SATA and USB subsystems . Given the fact that the A-series processors have a locked CPU multiplier, there is little hope that the AMD A8-3850 speed will exceed 2.9GHz based on 100 MHz reference clock and 29x multiplier.

But users were intrigued that the ASRock A75 Pro4 motherboard they used for testing allowed the multiplier to be increased to 36x, resulting in a total frequency of 3.6GHz. However, despite CPU-Z reporting that the above value has been reached, the multiplier has not actually changed. The test results were identical to performance at 2.9 GHz. Attempts to overclock the AMD A8-3850 proved to be almost fruitless, as users were only able to achieve a 5 MHz increase, which led to an increase in the processor frequency to 3.4 GHz and the GPU to 630 MHz. According to the manufacturer, this is because some of the motherboards have the ability to block SATA and USB to allow more overclocking. The same source claims that some boards have invisible dividers that are enabled for SATA and USB at certain reference clocks. This could mean, for example, that 133 MHz results in stable overclocking of the AMD A8-3850 processor, while at 120 MHz this cannot be achieved simply because a higher reference clock initiates the use of a higher SATA/USB divider.

According to user feedback, this information for overclocking was not very useful, as the motherboard strongly refused to boot at any reference frequency above 105 MHz.

Cinebench R11.5

This test uses Maxon’s Cinema 4D to render a very complex photorealistic scene with reflections, volumetric lights and procedural shaders that are CPU intensive. Because it uses real-world objects like those found in movies like Spider-Man and Star Wars, Cinebench R11.5 can be seen as a test of the real environment. According to user reviews, in it the processor scored 3.33 points with 2.9GHz and 3.51 points at 3.04 GHz. Competitor Core i3-2100 scored 3 points.

WPrime

This is a multi-threaded math test with a counter-intuitive use of square roots rather than prime numbers. The standard test uses a set of 32 million numbers and calculates the square roots of each with a recursive call to Newton’s method as an estimator. WPrime scales beautifully across multiple CPU cores and can load them fully at 100%. The result of the calculations is expressed as the amount of time spent on finding the square root of the entire set of 32 million numbers. The lower the score, the higher the performance. According to user reviews, the result of the AMD A8-3850 is 14.443 s and 13.635 s (at 2.9and 3.04 GHz). Core i3-2100 counts longer. For all calculations, the Intel processor spends 18.090 s. Left 4 Dead 2 frequencies and, respectively, 60 and 80 fps when overclocked to 3.04 GHz. The Core i3-2100 processor provides frame rates of 13 and 22 fps.

Call of Duty: Black Ops

According to user feedback, the game was tested with the maximum detail setting in the game menu. Since the highest frame rate is limited by default to 91 fps, it had to be increased to 250 fps in the configuration file. Running a 90-second multiplayer segment played through the excellent built-in player, with settings similar to the previous test, showed the lowest screen refresh rate of 30 fps, with an average of 54 fps. For the overclocked processor, these figures increased to 33 and 60 fps, respectively. The competing Intel Core processor delivered unacceptable 11 and 20 fps.

Power Consumption

All power-saving technologies have been turned off for all performance tests performed by processor users so that adequate results can be obtained and the best performance can be obtained, despite the fact that technologies such as Intel SpeedStep take microseconds to start which in some cases may have an effect. However, to evaluate the performance of the AMD A8-3850 processor in the power consumption area, all the functionality was used to the fullest, so that an external wattmeter could determine the real power consumption, so the results represent the total power of the system, and not the power consumption of the CPU itself. A separate measurement of the consumption of any individual PC component is almost impossible.

Users report that in standby mode, when the PC screen is nothing but Windows 7 desktop with Aero activated, the total system consumption of AMD A8-3850 Quadcore is 47W, while Intel Core i3-2100 is 40W. Analysis of processor power efficiency, when both the CPU and GPU are under load, for the tested model gave a result of 92 watts. At the competitor, this indicator turned out to be much less — only 66 watts.

Performance analysis

AMD A8-3850 test results were compared using a similarly priced Core i3-2100 processor and comparable motherboards, chosen so that the total system cost for the two test benches was approximately the same. The performance test for the model under evaluation started well, as its Cinebench 11.5 (3.33) score was 0.33 ahead of the Intel competitor. A similar situation arose in the WPrime 32M test. The A8-3850 processor, with a time of 14. 443 s, was far ahead of the competitor, the result of which is 18.090 s The reason for this is twice the number of cores. It is in these tests that extra power provides the maximum benefit.

Tougher checking in the form of media processing takes advantage of multiprocessor computing, but also rewards processors that execute more instructions per clock. The i3-2100 chip dominates this area because the Sandy Bridge architecture can handle much more data than the aging K10 architecture.

The image editing test scored the AMD A8-3850 2 90 GHz at 888 and the i3-2100 at 1331, a 49% improvement. The same was repeated in other tests, with the A8-3850 trailing 28% in video encoding, which usually rewards processors with extra cores. The overall score of the A8-3850 was 1059 points, well behind the 1476 points of the Intel processor.

However, the main advantage of the Llano APU, according to users, is its improved performance in 3D games. Could it be the basis for a cheap gaming PC? Or are entry-level GPUs doomed? The answer to both questions is a resounding “Yes!”.

At a screen resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels with 0x AA, the AMD A8-3850 APU in L4D2 achieves a minimum frame rate of 54 fps with all settings set to high. This is a great result, which means that it is now finally possible to build a home theater system that allows you to play at 720p resolution without the need for a separate graphics card. For comparison, the minimum frame rate of the i3-2100 processor of 13 fps at the same settings practically does not allow you to play. In the game L4D2, the A8-3850 also performs well at higher image definition. With a resolution of 1680 x 1050 pixels, the APU achieves a minimum frame rate of 33 fps, which allows you to play comfortably even during a zombie invasion. This makes the Llano-based system really competitive when choosing less graphically demanding games on a standard 22-inch display. COD: Black Ops also shows acceptable results at 1280 x 720 without AA, although the processor can no longer cope with a large number of pixels.

A more subtle difference between competing chips can be seen in image quality when evaluating 3D performance. The Intel i3-2100 GPU in games couldn’t cope with some of the soft shadows that can be seen on an AMD system despite all game settings being the same. The loss of these shadows is immediately noticeable as they add depth and realism to the game environment.

DRAM speed

AMD A8-3850 processor specifications were evaluated using DDR3 memory operating at 1333 MHz. Thanks to this, the comparison of results becomes fair. However, it is interesting to see how much the performance of the A8-3850 will increase from the use of faster RAM. Moreover, the GPU shares the RAM along with the central one. Using a faster storage device should be comparable to overclocking it in a discrete graphics card.

This has been confirmed in practice. According to user feedback, increasing the DDR3 frequency to 1.6GHz significantly improved 3D performance. At the same time, the minimum frame rate increased by 6 fps at a resolution of 1680 x 1050 pixels in L4D 2 and by 3 fps in Black Ops, which slightly improved its quality. Interestingly, the increase in the frequency of the RAM to 1600 MHz affected more than the meager overclocking of the processor.

Conclusion

The AMD A8-3850’s positives are irresistible as it finally makes fully integrated graphics capable of reasonable performance available. The APU proved its worth in gaming tests at low to medium resolutions, even with all other settings set to maximum. This makes AMD’s A-series processors a desirable purchase for anyone looking for a low-end media center or budget gaming station to pair with a small monitor. An interesting solution is the asymmetric CrossFire, which allows you to achieve higher performance on a low-cost APU with a base-level discrete graphics card, although the limitation to only DX10/11 games is a significant deterrent. It looks like the A8-3850 has made much of the base segment of the GPU market redundant. And this is the result that users are most pleased with.

Unfortunately, not everything is so rosy. As shown by the low performance of the AMD A8-3850 processor in multimedia tests, the model lags behind the similarly priced Intel i3-2100 chip in many ways. Obviously, this will be a problem when editing images or encoding videos. However, according to users, the trade-off between improved graphical performance in exchange for moderately worse media performance is in most cases justified, especially if such systems become widespread in the future.

Customers looking for an inexpensive PC, just an office PC or a home theater that can double as a gaming station when needed, will find the A8-3850 ideal, as the processor is significantly cheaper than an i3-2100-based system with a discrete GPU. The AMD chipset has more than enough power to deliver high performance and has the advantages of a discrete GPU that is enough to support the required 3D performance.

AMD A6-9225 vs Intel Core i3-4100U — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors

VS

AMD A6-9225

Intel Core i3-4100U

Which one to choose?

It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in AMD A6-9225 vs Intel Core i3-4100U comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!

Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor

Who will win in the comparison of AMD A6-9225 and Intel Core i3-4100U. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.

2.60 GHz

Clock frequency

1.80 GHZ

2

Number of nuclei

2

3.00 GHZ

turbo (1 core)

No Turbo

2

Number

No Turbo

NO

Hypertureuding

YES

No.

Acceleration

NO

Family and generation of the processor

Internal graphics

It is difficult to compare AMD A6-9225 against the Intel Core i3-4100U when the function and performance of the graphics card only matters in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Name GPU

Intel HD Graphics 4400

0.66 GHZ

Frequency GPU

0.20 GHZ

NO TURBO

1.000 GPU

1.00 GPU (TURBO)

1.00 GPU (TURBO)

1.00 GPU (TURBO) Generation

7.5

12

version DirectX

11.1

3

Executive blocks

20,0002

160

GB

Maximum memory

9000 2 GB

9000 3 9000 3 9000 2

Number of monitors

3

28 nm

Technology

22 nm

Q2/2016

Release date

Q2/2013

Codec support

0015

Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

Decode

h364

Decode / Encode

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode

Decode

h365 8bit

No

Decode

h365 10bit

No

Decode

VP8

DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SODIMM
LPDDR3-1333
LPDDR3-1600

8 GB

Maximum memory

16 GB

1

Memory channels

2

NO

ECC

NO

9000 3.0

version PCIe

9000 2.0

9000 8 9000 8 9000 9000 PCIe lanes

12

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes

AES-NI

Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal management and TDP

Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD A6-9225 and Intel Core i3-4100U, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).

15 W

TDP

15 W

90 °C

Maximum temperature

100 °C

—

Maximum TDP

—

10 W

TDP Down

—

Technical Details

2.00 MB

L3-CACHE 9000 3.00 MB

9000 28 NM

Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology Technologies Technology Technology Technology Technology Technology

22 NM

Stoney Ridge (Excavator)

Architecture

Haswell

AMD-V, AMD-VI

Virtualization

VT-X, VT-X EPT

FP4

Jack (Separation) 9000 Jack0003

BGA 1168

Q3/2018

Release date

Q3/2013

Price

ca. 220 $

Devices compatible with this processor

You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Popular CPU comparisons

one.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i5-4210U
2.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i7-1165G7
3.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i5-6300U
four.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Celeron J4115
5.		Intel Celeron N4020 vs. AMD A6-9225
6.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i3-3240
7.		AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A8-7650K
eight.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i3-6157U
9.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i7-1185G7
ten.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i7-5500U
eleven.		AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD FX-4350
12.		AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD A10-8700P
13.		AMD A6-9225 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
fourteen.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i5-3470S
fifteen.