AMD A8-4500M vs Intel Core i5-2520M
Summary
-
AMD A8-4500M
100%
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
173%
Relative performance
-
AMD A8-4500M
100%
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
197%
Relative performance
-
AMD A8-4500M
100%
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
158%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD A8-4500M |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-2520M |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 97% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 58% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 73% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-2520M
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i5-2520M
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD A8-4500M | Intel Core i5-2520M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4.1 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| SSE4a | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| AES | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| CVT16 | ||||
| EVP | ||||
| FMA4 | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| XOP | ||||
| Turbo Core | ||||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit (an NX bit implementation) | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| Intel VT-x | ||||
| Intel VT-d | ||||
| Hyper-threading | ||||
| Turbo Boost | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
Smart Cache. |
||||
Architecture
| AMD A8-4500M | Intel Core i5-2520M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Piledriver | vs | Intel_SandyBridge | |
| Market | Mobile | vs | Mobile | |
| Memory Support | unknown | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Trinity | vs | Sandy Bridge | |
| Release Date | May 2012 | vs | Feb 2011 |
Cores
| AMD A8-4500M | Intel Core i5-2520M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | vs | 2 | |
| Threads | 4 | vs | 2 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 7640G | vs | Intel HD 3000 |
Cache
| AMD A8-4500M | Intel Core i5-2520M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 4096 KB (shared) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 3072 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD A8-4500M | Intel Core i5-2520M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FS1r2 | vs | Intel BGA1023 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | rPGA | |
| Die Size | 246mm² | vs | 149mm² | |
| Process | 32 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| AMD A8-4500M | Intel Core i5-2520M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 1900 MHz | vs | 2500 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 2800 MHz | vs | none | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | 1. 3 V |
vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 35 W | vs | 35 W |
-
AMD A8-4500M
1708 points
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
2500 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
3801 points
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
5000 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
3133
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
4773
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
1258
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
2578
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
3318
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
5329
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
1190
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
2288
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
2438
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
3541.5
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
1820.
5 -
Intel Core i5-2520M
4040.5
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
4872
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
8814.5
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
1.71
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
2.86
points — higher is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
40.76
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
12
seconds — lower is better
-
AMD A8-4500M
31.45
-
Intel Core i5-2520M
18
seconds — lower is better
A8-4500M vs Core i5-11600KF — How Many FPS Italy
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms A8-4500M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3227 days newer than A8-4500M.
Advantages of AMD A8-4500M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF — 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn’t have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 70% better in Grand Theft Auto V than A8-4500M — 306 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD A8-4500M — 12 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
A8-4500M
Mobile • May 15th, 2012
FPS
180
59%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
306
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.
86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€262.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600KF 11 generazione Desktop Processore (frequenza base: 3,9 GHz Tuboboost: 4,9 GHz, 6 core, LGA1200) BX8070811600KF
Buy for €262.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
A8-4500M
Mobile • May 15th, 2012
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
740
FPS
1212
FPS
League of Legends
180
FPS
306
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
315
FPS
533
FPS
VALORANT
196
FPS
329
FPS
Fortnite
996
FPS
1611
FPS
Minecraft
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
A8-4500M
Mobile • May 15th, 2012
Single-Core
310
19%
Multi-Core
823
10%
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1640
100%
Multi-Core
7864
100%
|
AMD A8-4500M |
vs |
Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date |
Mar 16th, 2021 |
| A8 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Trinity | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket FS1r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
|
Mobile |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 4 | Cores |
6 |
| 4 | Threads |
12 |
1.
|