Amd a8 processor vs intel: AMD A8-7680 vs Intel Core i5-7200U @ 2.50GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

5 января, 2023

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i5-7200u-vs-a8-7410%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 7
3700X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i5-7200u-vs-a8-7410%23technologies

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 7
3700X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.

KA) or Intel Core i5 650

    • Home
    • >
    • Processors
    • >
    • AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.KA) VS Intel Core i5 650

    Family

    • A8-7650K APU (2014 D.KA)
      Compare
    • FX-770K (2014 D.KA)
      Compare
    • A6-7470K APU (2014 D.KA)
      22 Compare
    • A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
      Compare

    Family

    • Core i5 760
      Compare
    • Core i5 680
      Compare
    • Core I5 ​​660
      Compare
    • Core I5 ​​661
      Compare

      A8-7600 APU (2014 )

      37.5 (+1%)

      Core i5 650

      37.2

      Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

      The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

      The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

      Speed ​​in office use

      A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)

      41.2

      Core i5 650

      43 (+4%)

      Performance in everyday work, e.g. browsers and office

      The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

      Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

      Speed ​​in heavy applications

      A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)

      19.7

      Core i5 650

      20.3 (+3%)

      The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

      At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

      Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

      Speed ​​of numerical operations

      Simple household tasks

      A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)

      33.8

      Core i5 650

      40.2 (+19%)

      Demanding games and tasks

      A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)

      15.3

      Core i5 650

      15.5 (+1%)

      Extreme

      A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)

      3

      Core i5 650

      3.1 (+3%)

      Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

      We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

      Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

      When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

      Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

      Characteristics

      Main

      Manufacturer Firm AMD Intel

      Performance

      Cores The total number of physical cores. 2 2
      ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 4
      Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS you can try disabling the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can try disabling the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard).
      Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.1 GHz 3.2 GHz

      Cache and RAM

      Video core

      PCI

      Detailed information

      Which is better

      AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.

      Ka) %.

    Intel Core i5 650

    • 1% faster performance in office applications and browsers.
    • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 3%.
    • The base frequency is 0.1 GHz higher.

    How are they similar

    • The number of physical cores is the same.
    • The number of threads is equal.

    Comparison of AMD A8-7050 and Intel Core i5-9600

    Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7050 and Intel Core i5-9600 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Compatibility, Technology, Virtualization, Memory, Security and Reliability.
    Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark — Single thread mark, Passmark — CPU mark.

    AMD A8-7050

    versus

    Intel Core i5-9600

    Advantages

    reasons to choose AMD A8-7050