AMD A8-7050 vs Intel Core i7-9700KF
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7050 and Intel Core i7-9700KF processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory, Peripherals, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD A8-7050
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7050
- 4. 8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 217.952 vs 195.33
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 95 Watt |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 217.952 vs 195.33 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-9700KF
- 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.416 vs 6.049
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.619
Number of cores | 8 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.416 vs 6.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 vs 0.619 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-7050
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-9700KF
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-7050 | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.049 | 9.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 217.952 | 195. 33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.619 | 1.2 |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2905 | |
PassMark — CPU mark | 14408 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1304 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 7379 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 5929 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6. 168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A8-7050 | Intel Core i7-9700KF | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Bald Eagle | Coffee Lake |
Launch date | Q3’14 | Q1’19 |
Place in performance rating | 1514 | 1062 |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Processor Number | i7-9700KF | |
Series | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | |
Status | Launched | |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2. 20 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
Bus Speed | 100 MHz | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100°C |
Number of cores | 2 | 8 |
Number of threads | 2 | 8 |
VID voltage range | 1. 012 V | |
Maximum frequency | 4.90 GHz | |
Sockets supported | FP3 (906) | FCLGA1151 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 95 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | |
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41. 6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot |
AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i7-860 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i7-860
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | AMD A8-7600 | Intel Core i7-860 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Steamroller | Nehalem | ||||||
Core name | Steamroller | Lynnfield | ||||||
Family | A8-7000 | Core i7-800 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
AD7600YBI44JA, |
BX80605I7860, |
||||||
Release date | Q3 2014 | Q3 2009 | ||||||
Lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 2. 410.000.000 | 774.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,1 GHz | 2,8 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,8 GHz | 3,46 GHz | ||||||
High performance cores |
4 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,1 / 3,8 GHz |
— |
||||||
Cache memory | 4 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR3-2133 |
DDR3 1066/1333 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 21 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 95 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri) | None | ||||||
GPU cores | 6 | — | ||||||
GPU shading units | 384 | — | ||||||
GPU base clock | 351 MHz | — | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 720 MHz | — | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 553 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
Socket | FM2+ | LGA1156 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 71. 3°C | 72.7°C | ||||||
Crypto engine |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
— |
||||||
Security |
Enhanced Virus Protection |
— |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 208 | 229 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 696 | 1.273 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 84 | 97 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 291 | 549 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 1.425 | 1.310 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 3. 197 | 2.851 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.246 | 2.513 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
5.812 | 8.111 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
53,86 GFLOPS | 64,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
89 pts / W | 85 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A8-7600 is greater, that the PDT of AMD A8-7600 is lower. The AMD A8-7600 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-860 |
229 1. 273 |
AMD A8-7600 |
208 696 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 83%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-860 |
97 549 |
AMD A8-7600 |
84 291 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 89%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD A8-7600 |
1.425 3.197 |
Intel Core i7-860 |
1.310 2.851 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-860 |
2.513 8.111 |
AMD A8-7600 |
2.246 5.812 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 40%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-860 |
2. 771 7.423 |
AMD A8-7600 |
2.236 5.713 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 30%.
On Mac OS X:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-860 |
2.312 7.485 |
AMD A8-7600 |
2.084 5.502 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Equivalence:
AMD A8-7600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-860 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i7-8650UIntel Core i7-8665U
Intel Core i7 8700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i7 8700K at 3.7 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with 8 cores at 3.4 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single-threaded performance
Single core benchmark rating
Core i7 8700K
56
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
70
9 0002 Multi-threaded performance
All-core benchmarks
Core i7 8700K
29
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
52
Energy Efficiency
Chip Energy Efficiency
Core i7 8700K
44
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
74
NanoReview Rating
Final Processor Score
Core i7 8700K 900 03
43
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
64
Key differences
What are the main differences between 5800X3D and 8700K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700K
- Unlocked multiplier
- Integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
- More than 10°C higher maximum operating temperature
- 4% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4 . 7 GHz vs. 4.5 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Has 86016 KB more L3 cache
- Launched 4 years and 6 months later than rival
- More modern process technology — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
- Has 2 more physical cores
- New PCI Express standard — 4.0
- 31% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1633 and 1242 points
- On 6.0 8 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 8700K
1206
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+20%
1450
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
8820
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+68%
14783
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 8700K
2730
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+17%
3186
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
13683
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+102%
27708
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 8700K
1230
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+32%
1624
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
6581
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+76%
11562
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full specifications for Intel Core i7 8700K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
General information
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Release date | October 5, 2017 | March 15, 2022 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen 3 (Vermeer) |
Model number | i7-8700K | — |
Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Processor
Cores | 6 | 8 |
threads | 12 | 16 |
Frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 37x | 34x |
Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 96MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95W | 105W |
Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 90°C |
Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
Shader blocks | 192 | — |
TMUs | 24 | — |
ROPs | 3 | — |
Computing units | 24 | — |
TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution | 4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700K
0.38 teraflops
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
n/a
90 002
Memory support
Memory type | — DDR4-2666 | — DDR4-3200 — DDR4-2933 — DDR4-2667 |
Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
Official site | Site Intel Core i7 8700K | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 8700K
4 (21.1%)
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
15 (78.9%)
Total votes: 19
Competitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 7 5800X3D
2.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D
3.
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D
4.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D
5.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D
6.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D
7.
Intel Core i5 13600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
8.
Intel Core i7 13700K and i7 8700K
9.
Intel Core i5 12600K and i7 8700K
10.
Intel Core i5 12400F and i7 8700K
Compare other CPUs (540+)
Intel Core i7 1165G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800H:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 1165G7
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
Which is better: 4-core Intel Core i7 1165G7 at 1. 2-2.8 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 6800H with 8 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these notebook processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single-threaded performance
Single-core benchmark rating
Core i7 1165G7
66
Ryzen 7 6800H
72
90 002 Multi-threaded performance
All core benchmarks
Core i7 1165G7
20
Ryzen 7 6800H
47
Energy efficiency
9000 2 Chip Power Efficiency
Core i7 1165G7
67
Ryzen 7 6800H
76
NanoReview Rating
Final Processor Score
Core i7 1165G7
50
Ryzen 7 6800H
66
Key differences
What are the main differences between 6800H and 1165G7
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
- Has 4 physical cores more
- Appeared 1 year and 4 months later than the rival
- More modern process technology — 6 vs. 6 KB more L3 cache
- 14% faster in single core Geekbench v5 — 1623 and 1426 points
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 1165G7
1496
Ryzen 7 6800H
+4%
1556
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 1165G7
6066
Ryzen 7 6800H
+141%
14617
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 1165G7
2845
Ryzen 7 6800H
+15%
3277
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 1165G7
10376
Ryzen 7 6800H
+129%
23787
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 1165G7
1419
Ryzen 7 6800H
+14%
1612
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 1165G7
4321
Ryzen 7 6800H
+129%
9891
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 1165G7 and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
General information
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Release date | September 2, 2020 | January 4, 2022 |
Type | For laptop | For laptop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Tiger Lake | Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) |
Model number | i7-1165G7 | — |
Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Radeon 680M |
Processor
Cores | 4 | 8 |
threads | 8 | 16 |
Frequency | 1. 2-2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.7 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 12-28x | 32x |
Bus speed | 4 GT/s | — |
Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 1280KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Process | 10 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-28W | 45W |
Socket | BGA-1449 | FP7 |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | AMD Radeon 680M |
GPU frequency | 300 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Boost GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Shader blocks | 768 | 768 |
TMUs | 48 | 48 |
ROPs | 24 | 32 |
Computer units | 96 | 12 |
TGP | 15W | 15W |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 1165G7
1. 69 teraflops
Ryzen 7 6800H
3.686 teraflops
Memory support
Memory type | — DDR4-3200 — LPDDR4x-4267 |
— DDR5-4800 — LPDDR5-6400 |
Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. throughput | — | 76.8 GB/s |
ECC support | No | No |
Other
Official site | Site Intel Core i7 1165G7 | AMD Ryzen 7 6800H website |
PCI Express Version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 1165G7
3 (8.3%)
Ryzen 7 6800H
33 (91.