Amd a8 vs i7: Please click the green button to continue.

AMD A8-7050 vs Intel Core i7-9700KF

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7050 and Intel Core i7-9700KF processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory, Peripherals, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD A8-7050

Buy on Amazon

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7050

4. 8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 95 Watt
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 217.952 vs 195.33

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 95 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	217.952 vs 195.33

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-9700KF

6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
6 more threads: 8 vs 2
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.416 vs 6.049
Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.619

Number of cores	8 vs 2
Number of threads	8 vs 2
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.416 vs 6.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.2 vs 0.619

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-7050
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-9700KF

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

217.

952

195.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	AMD A8-7050	Intel Core i7-9700KF
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.049	9.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	217.952	195. 33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.619	1.2
PassMark — Single thread mark		2905
PassMark — CPU mark		14408
Geekbench 4 — Single Core		1304
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core		7379
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score		5929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		6. 168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		17.505

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A8-7050	Intel Core i7-9700KF
Architecture codename	Bald Eagle	Coffee Lake
Launch date	Q3’14	Q1’19
Place in performance rating	1514	1062
Vertical segment	Laptop	Desktop
Processor Number		i7-9700KF
Series		9th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors
Status		Launched
64 bit support
Base frequency	2. 20 GHz	3.60 GHz
Bus Speed	100 MHz	8 GT/s DMI3
L2 cache	1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100°C
Number of cores	2	8
Number of threads	2	8
VID voltage range	1. 012 V
Maximum frequency		4.90 GHz
Sockets supported	FP3 (906)	FCLGA1151
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt	95 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Package Size		37.5mm x 37.5mm
Thermal Solution		PCG 2015D (130W)
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions		Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Max memory channels		2
Maximum memory bandwidth		41. 6 GB/s
Maximum memory size		128 GB
Supported memory types		DDR4-2666
Max number of PCIe lanes		16
PCI Express revision		3.0
PCIe configurations		Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability		1S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Secure Boot

AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i7-860 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i7-860

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A8-7600 on one side and the Intel Core i7-860 on the other side.

The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	AMD A8-7600	Intel Core i7-860
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Steamroller	Nehalem
Core name	Steamroller	Lynnfield
Family	A8-7000	Core i7-800
Part number(s), S-Spec	AD7600YBI44JA, AD7600YBJABOX	BX80605I7860, BXC80605I7860, BV80605001908AK, Q3AL, SLBJJ
Release date	Q3 2014	Q3 2009
Lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Transistors	2. 410.000.000	774.000.000
Cores	4	4
Threads	4	8
Base frequency	3,1 GHz	2,8 GHz
Turbo frequency	3,8 GHz	3,46 GHz
High performance cores	4 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,1 / 3,8 GHz	—
Cache memory	4 MB	8 MB
Max memory capacity	8 GB	16 GB
Memory types	DDR3-2133	DDR3 1066/1333
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	34,1 GB/s	21 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	8	16
TDP	65 W	95 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri)	None
GPU cores	6	—
GPU shading units	384	—
GPU base clock	351 MHz	—
GPU boost clock	720 MHz	—
GPU FP32 floating point	553 GFLOPS	—
Socket	FM2+	LGA1156
Compatible motherboard	—	Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	71. 3°C	72.7°C
Crypto engine	Advanced Encryption Standard instructions	—
Security	Enhanced Virus Protection	—
CPU-Z single thread	208	229
CPU-Z multi thread	696	1.273
Cinebench R15 single thread	84	97
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	291	549
PassMark single thread	1.425	1.310
PassMark CPU Mark	3. 197	2.851
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core	2.246	2.513
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core	5.812	8.111
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	53,86 GFLOPS	64,6 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	89 pts / W	85 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A8-7600 is greater, that the PDT of AMD A8-7600 is lower. The AMD A8-7600 was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-860	229 1. 273
AMD A8-7600	208 696

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 83%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-860	97 549
AMD A8-7600	84 291

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 89%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD A8-7600	1.425 3.197
Intel Core i7-860	1.310 2.851

In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i7-860	2.513 8.111
AMD A8-7600	2.246 5.812

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 40%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i7-860	2. 771 7.423
AMD A8-7600	2.236 5.713

In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 30%.

On Mac OS X:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
Intel Core i7-860	2.312 7.485
AMD A8-7600	2.084 5.502

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.

This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD A8-7600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-860 AMD equivalent

Intel Core i7 8700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D:

performance comparison

Intel Core i7 8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i7 8700K at 3.7 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with 8 cores at 3.4 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

Overview
Differences
Performance
Features
Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single-threaded performance

Single core benchmark rating

Core i7 8700K

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

9 0002 Multi-threaded performance

All-core benchmarks

Core i7 8700K

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Energy Efficiency

Chip Energy Efficiency

Core i7 8700K

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

NanoReview Rating

Final Processor Score

Core i7 8700K 900 03

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Key differences

What are the main differences between 5800X3D and 8700K

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700K

Unlocked multiplier
Integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
More than 10°C higher maximum operating temperature
4% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4 . 7 GHz vs. 4.5 GHz)

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Has 86016 KB more L3 cache
Launched 4 years and 6 months later than rival
More modern process technology — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
Has 2 more physical cores
New PCI Express standard — 4.0
31% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1633 and 1242 points
On 6.0 8 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i7 8700K

1206

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+20%

1450

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i7 8700K

8820

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+68%

14783

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i7 8700K

2730

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+17%

3186

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i7 8700K

13683

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+102%

27708

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i7 8700K

1230

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+32%

1624

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i7 8700K

6581

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
+76%

11562

Add your Cinebench R23 results

Specifications

List of full specifications for Intel Core i7 8700K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

General information

Manufacturer	Intel	AMD
Release date	October 5, 2017	March 15, 2022
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Instruction set architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Coffee Lake	Zen 3 (Vermeer)
Model number	i7-8700K	—
Integrated graphics	UHD Graphics 630	No

Processor

Performance cores
Cores	6	8
threads	12	16
Frequency	3. 7 GHz	3.4 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost	4.7 GHz	4.5 GHz

General
Number of cores	6	8
Number of threads	12	16
Bus frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	37x	34x
Tire speed	8 GT/s	—
Level 1 cache	64KB (per core)	64KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	256KB (per core)	512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	12MB (shared)	96MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Process	14 nanometers	7 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP)	95W	105W
Socket	LGA-1151	AM4
Critical temperature	100°C	90°C

Integrated graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630	—
GPU frequency	350 MHz	—
Boost GPU frequency	1200 MHz	—
Shader blocks	192	—
TMUs	24	—
ROPs	3	—
Computing units	24	—
TGP	15W	—
Max. resolution	4096×2304 — 60Hz	—

iGPU FLOPS

Core i7 8700K

0.38 teraflops

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

n/a

90 002

Memory support

Memory type	— DDR4-2666	— DDR4-3200 — DDR4-2933 — DDR4-2667
Max. size	128 GB	128 GB
Number of channels	2	2
Max. bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	47.68 GB/s
ECC support	No	Yes

Other

website

Official site	Site Intel Core i7 8700K	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
PCI Express Version	3.0	4.0
Max. PCI Express lanes	16	20
Extended instructions	SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2	—

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i7 8700K

4 (21.1%)

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

15 (78.9%)

Total votes: 19

Competitors

1.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

2.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

3.
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

4.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

5.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

6.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

7.
Intel Core i5 13600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

8.
Intel Core i7 13700K and i7 8700K

9.
Intel Core i5 12600K and i7 8700K

10.
Intel Core i5 12400F and i7 8700K

Compare other CPUs (540+)

Intel Core i7 11800H vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X:

performance comparison

Intel Core i7 11800H

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Which is better: an 8-core laptop Intel Core i7 11800H at 1. 9-2.3 GHz or a desktop AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 12 cores at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

Overview
Differences
Performance
Features
Comments