Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a8-7410-vs-pentium-n3700%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a8-7410-vs-pentium-n3700%23technologies
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
AMD A8-4500M APU or Intel Pentium N3700
- Come
- >
- Processors
- >
- Comparison
- >
- A8-4500M APU VS Intel Pentium N3700
45555m APU
Compare
Family
- Pentium N3710
Compare
Speed in games
A8-4500M APU
34.1 (+63%)
Pentium N3700 N3700 N37000035
20.9
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Office speed
A8-4500M APU
36.9 (+68%)
Pentium N3700
21.
9
Performance in daily activities such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CAD programs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
A8-4500M APU
17.2 (+56%)
Pentium N3700
11
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
A8-4500M APU 27.4 (+57%) Pentium N3700 17.4 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
A8-4500M APU 9.2 (+39%) Pentium N3700 6.6 |
Extreme |
|
A8-4500M APU 1.8 (+38%) Pentium N3700 1.3 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS. nine0035
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads. nine0035
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum).
A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. nine0035
Passmark
AMD A8-4500M APU
1645 (+32%)
Intel Pentium N3700
1246
Characteristics The main
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | 4 | |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 | 4 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. nine0089 | Missing | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in case of corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. |
1.9 GHz | |
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 35 W | 6W |
Cache and RAM
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. nine0089 | DDR3-1600 MHz Dual-channel |
DDR3L-1600 |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. nine0089
| Radeon HD 7640G | Intel® HD Graphics |
PCI
| PCI-E PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | Gen 2 | 1×4/2×2/1×2 + 2×1/4×1 |
Detailed information
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Trinity | Braswell |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied. |
32 nm |
Which is better
AMD A8-4500M APU
- On average, gaming performance is 63% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 39%.
- Faster in complex multi-threaded applications and outperforms by 38%.
- The base frequency is 0.3 GHz higher.
Intel Pentium N3700
- TDP is 83% lower
What are the similarities of
- The number of physical cores is equal.
- The number of threads is equal.
Comparison of Intel Pentium N3700 and AMD A8 Pro-7150B
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium N3700 and AMD A8 Pro-7150B processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
nine0035
Intel Pentium N3700
versus
AMD A8 Pro-7150B
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium N3700
- Newer processor, 9 month(s) difference in production dates
- allows for a newer manufacturing process with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16.
7 times less power consumption: 6 Watt vs 100 Watt - CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2x better performance: 11.663 vs 5.746
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 17% better performance : 0.127 vs 0.109
- About 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.51 vs 0.308
| Release date | 1 April 2015 vs 4 June 2014 |
| Process | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.663 vs 5.746 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0. 127 vs 0.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.51 vs 0.308 |
Reasons to choose AMD A8 Pro-7150B
- Approximately 33% more clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.40 GHz
- 2x larger L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- PassMark — Single thread mark about 26% faster: 797 vs 634
- PassMark — CPU mark about 27% better: 1567 vs 1238
- Geekbench 4 — Single Core about 28 % more: 271 vs 212
- About 2% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 700 vs 686
- About 8% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 2.83 vs 2.632
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 29% higher: 2.205 vs 1.706
| Max frequency | 3. 2 GHz vs 2.40 GHz |
| Level 2 cache | 4MB vs 2MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1567 vs 1238 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 271 vs 212 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 700 vs 686 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.83 vs 2.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.205 vs 1.706 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium N3700
CPU 2: AMD A8 Pro-7150B
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
nine0089 | ||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
nine0084 | |||
| CPU 1 | ||||
| CPU 2 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
nine0086
| 11.663 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
nine0089
5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
nine0086
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
| Name | Intel Pentium N3700 | AMD A8 Pro-7150B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 634 | 797 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1238 | 1567 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 212 | 271 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 686 | 700 |
| CompuBench 1. |
2.632 | 2.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.663 | 5.746 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.127 | 0.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.51 | 0.308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.706 | 2.205 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 569 | |
| GFXBench 4. |
1298 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2070 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 569 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1298 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2070 |
Feature comparison
| Intel Pentium N3700 | AMD A8 Pro-7150B | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Braswell | Kaveri |
| Production date | April 1, 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
| Price at first issue date | $161 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2393 | 2861 |
| Price now | $444. |
|
| Processor Number | N3700 | |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 1.22 | |
| Applicability | Mobile | Laptop |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AM715BECh54JA | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1. |
1.9 GHz |
| Level 2 cache | 2MB | 4MB |
| Process | 14nm | 28nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Crystal area | 245mm | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3 / DDR3L-1600 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
| Number of execution units | 16 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 400MHz | |
| Maximum GPU clock | 700MHz | 533MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Video memory size | 8GB | |
| Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Enduro | ||
| Number of iGPU cores | 384 | |
| Number of shaders | 384 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | nine0086 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | |
| WiDi support | ||
| DirectX | Yes | 12 |
| OpenGL | Yes | |
| Vulcan | ||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors per configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4W | |
| Supported sockets | FP3 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Number of PCI Express lanes | ||
| Maximum number of SATA 6 Gb/s ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2. |
3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1×4/2×2/1×2 + 2×1/4×1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | nine0090 | |
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | nine0090 | |
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | nine0086 | |
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | nine0086 | |
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | nine0086 | |
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | nine0090 | |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2. |